{"id":"CVE-2009-0835","aliases":["DSA-1800-1","EUVD-2009-0832","GHSA-x75x-89gj-wfcm","RHSA-2009:0451"],"status":"published","title":"The __secure_computing function in kernel/seccomp.c in the seccomp subsystem in the Linux kernel...","description":"The __secure_computing function in kernel/seccomp.c in the seccomp subsystem in the Linux kernel 2.6.28.7 and earlier on the x86_64 platform, when CONFIG_SECCOMP is enabled, does not properly handle (1) a 32-bit process making a 64-bit syscall or (2) a 64-bit process making a 32-bit syscall, which allows local users to bypass intended access restrictions via crafted syscalls that are misinterpreted as (a) stat or (b) chmod, a related issue to CVE-2009-0342 and CVE-2009-0343.","severity":{"version":"2.0","score":3.6,"vector":"AV:L/AC:L/Au:N/C:P/I:P/A:N","level":"low","assessor":"primary","from":"nvd"},"epss":{"day":"2026-11-07","score":0.00928,"percentile":0.60734,"model":"v2026.06.15"},"facts":{"in_kev":false,"known_exploited":false,"public_exploit":true,"fix_available":false},"cwes":["CWE-264"],"published":"2009-03-06T11:00:00Z","modified":"2026-06-16T23:05:54Z","exploits":[{"source":"exploitdb","id":"EDB-32829","title":"Linux Kernel 2.6.x - 'seccomp' System Call Security Bypass","type":"local","platform":"linux","date":"2009-03-02","verified":true,"url":"https://www.exploit-db.com/exploits/32829"}],"affected":[{"source":"osv","ecosystem":"Debian:5.0","package":"linux-2.6","ranges":[{"type":"ECOSYSTEM","events":[{"introduced":"0"},{"fixed":"2.6.26-15lenny2"}]}],"versions":["2.6.26-13","2.6.26-13lenny2","2.6.26-13lenny2~bpo40+1","2.6.26-14","2.6.26-15","2.6.26-15lenny1","2.6.26-15~bpo40+1","2.6.26-15~bpo40+2"],"bundled":13},{"source":"osv","ecosystem":"Debian:5.0","package":"user-mode-linux","ranges":[{"type":"ECOSYSTEM","events":[{"introduced":"0"},{"fixed":"2.6.26-1um-2+15lenny2"}]}],"versions":["2.6.26-1um-2","2.6.26-1um-2+15"],"bundled":13},{"source":"osv","ecosystem":"Red Hat:enterprise_mrg:1::el5","package":"kernel-rt","ranges":[{"type":"ECOSYSTEM","events":[{"introduced":"0"},{"fixed":"0:2.6.24.7-111.el5rt"}]}],"bundled":6},{"source":"osv","ecosystem":"Red Hat:enterprise_mrg:1::el5","package":"kernel-rt-debug","ranges":[{"type":"ECOSYSTEM","events":[{"introduced":"0"},{"fixed":"0:2.6.24.7-111.el5rt"}]}],"bundled":6},{"source":"osv","ecosystem":"Red Hat:enterprise_mrg:1::el5","package":"kernel-rt-debug-debuginfo","ranges":[{"type":"ECOSYSTEM","events":[{"introduced":"0"},{"fixed":"0:2.6.24.7-111.el5rt"}]}],"bundled":6},{"source":"osv","ecosystem":"Red Hat:enterprise_mrg:1::el5","package":"kernel-rt-debug-devel","ranges":[{"type":"ECOSYSTEM","events":[{"introduced":"0"},{"fixed":"0:2.6.24.7-111.el5rt"}]}],"bundled":6},{"source":"osv","ecosystem":"Red Hat:enterprise_mrg:1::el5","package":"kernel-rt-debuginfo","ranges":[{"type":"ECOSYSTEM","events":[{"introduced":"0"},{"fixed":"0:2.6.24.7-111.el5rt"}]}],"bundled":6},{"source":"osv","ecosystem":"Red Hat:enterprise_mrg:1::el5","package":"kernel-rt-debuginfo-common","ranges":[{"type":"ECOSYSTEM","events":[{"introduced":"0"},{"fixed":"0:2.6.24.7-111.el5rt"}]}],"bundled":6},{"source":"osv","ecosystem":"Red Hat:enterprise_mrg:1::el5","package":"kernel-rt-devel","ranges":[{"type":"ECOSYSTEM","events":[{"introduced":"0"},{"fixed":"0:2.6.24.7-111.el5rt"}]}],"bundled":6},{"source":"osv","ecosystem":"Red Hat:enterprise_mrg:1::el5","package":"kernel-rt-doc","ranges":[{"type":"ECOSYSTEM","events":[{"introduced":"0"},{"fixed":"0:2.6.24.7-111.el5rt"}]}],"bundled":6},{"source":"osv","ecosystem":"Red Hat:enterprise_mrg:1::el5","package":"kernel-rt-trace","ranges":[{"type":"ECOSYSTEM","events":[{"introduced":"0"},{"fixed":"0:2.6.24.7-111.el5rt"}]}],"bundled":6},{"source":"osv","ecosystem":"Red Hat:enterprise_mrg:1::el5","package":"kernel-rt-trace-debuginfo","ranges":[{"type":"ECOSYSTEM","events":[{"introduced":"0"},{"fixed":"0:2.6.24.7-111.el5rt"}]}],"bundled":6},{"source":"osv","ecosystem":"Red Hat:enterprise_mrg:1::el5","package":"kernel-rt-trace-devel","ranges":[{"type":"ECOSYSTEM","events":[{"introduced":"0"},{"fixed":"0:2.6.24.7-111.el5rt"}]}],"bundled":6},{"source":"osv","ecosystem":"Red Hat:enterprise_mrg:1::el5","package":"kernel-rt-vanilla","ranges":[{"type":"ECOSYSTEM","events":[{"introduced":"0"},{"fixed":"0:2.6.24.7-111.el5rt"}]}],"bundled":6},{"source":"osv","ecosystem":"Red Hat:enterprise_mrg:1::el5","package":"kernel-rt-vanilla-debuginfo","ranges":[{"type":"ECOSYSTEM","events":[{"introduced":"0"},{"fixed":"0:2.6.24.7-111.el5rt"}]}],"bundled":6},{"source":"osv","ecosystem":"Red Hat:enterprise_mrg:1::el5","package":"kernel-rt-vanilla-devel","ranges":[{"type":"ECOSYSTEM","events":[{"introduced":"0"},{"fixed":"0:2.6.24.7-111.el5rt"}]}],"bundled":6}],"products":[{"vendor":"linux","product":"linux_kernel"}],"references":[{"url":"http://secunia.com/advisories/35390","tags":["third-party-advisory","x_refsource_SECUNIA","x_transferred","Vendor Advisory"]},{"url":"http://scarybeastsecurity.blogspot.com/2009/02/linux-kernel-minor-seccomp.html","tags":["x_refsource_MISC","x_transferred"]},{"url":"http://secunia.com/advisories/34786","tags":["third-party-advisory","x_refsource_SECUNIA","x_transferred"]},{"url":"http://www.mandriva.com/security/advisories?name=MDVSA-2009:118","tags":["vendor-advisory","x_refsource_MANDRIVA","x_transferred"]},{"url":"http://marc.info/?l=oss-security\u0026m=123597627132485\u0026w=2","tags":["mailing-list","x_refsource_MLIST","x_transferred"]},{"url":"http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2009-05/msg00002.html","tags":["vendor-advisory","x_refsource_SUSE","x_transferred"]},{"url":"http://scary.beasts.org/security/CESA-2009-001.html","tags":["x_refsource_MISC","x_transferred","Exploit"]},{"url":"http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2009-06/msg00000.html","tags":["vendor-advisory","x_refsource_SUSE","x_transferred"]},{"url":"http://www.ubuntu.com/usn/usn-751-1","tags":["vendor-advisory","x_refsource_UBUNTU","x_transferred"]},{"url":"http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/33948","tags":["vdb-entry","x_refsource_BID","x_transferred"]},{"url":"http://secunia.com/advisories/35185","tags":["third-party-advisory","x_refsource_SECUNIA","x_transferred","Vendor Advisory"]},{"url":"http://lkml.org/lkml/2009/2/28/23","tags":["mailing-list","x_refsource_MLIST","x_transferred"]},{"url":"http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2009-06/msg00001.html","tags":["vendor-advisory","x_refsource_SUSE","x_transferred"]},{"url":"http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2009-04/msg00007.html","tags":["vendor-advisory","x_refsource_SUSE","x_transferred"]},{"url":"http://secunia.com/advisories/34084","tags":["third-party-advisory","x_refsource_SECUNIA","x_transferred","Vendor Advisory"]},{"url":"http://www.debian.org/security/2009/dsa-1800","tags":["vendor-advisory","x_refsource_DEBIAN","x_transferred"]},{"url":"http://secunia.com/advisories/34917","tags":["third-party-advisory","x_refsource_SECUNIA","x_transferred","Vendor Advisory"]},{"url":"http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel\u0026m=123579056530191\u0026w=2","tags":["mailing-list","x_refsource_MLIST","x_transferred"]},{"url":"http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel\u0026m=123579069630311\u0026w=2","tags":["mailing-list","x_refsource_MLIST","x_transferred","Exploit"]},{"url":"http://scary.beasts.org/security/CESA-2009-004.html","tags":["x_refsource_MISC","x_transferred"]},{"url":"https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=487255","tags":["x_refsource_MISC","x_transferred","Exploit","report"]},{"url":"http://www.redhat.com/support/errata/RHSA-2009-0451.html","tags":["vendor-advisory","x_refsource_REDHAT","x_transferred"]},{"url":"http://secunia.com/advisories/35121","tags":["third-party-advisory","x_refsource_SECUNIA","x_transferred","Vendor Advisory"]},{"url":"http://secunia.com/advisories/35394","tags":["third-party-advisory","x_refsource_SECUNIA","x_transferred","Vendor Advisory"]},{"url":"https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2009-0835","tags":["advisory"]},{"url":"https://github.com/advisories/GHSA-x75x-89gj-wfcm"},{"url":"https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2009:0451","tags":["advisory"]},{"url":"https://access.redhat.com/security/updates/classification/#important","tags":["article"]},{"url":"https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=456282","tags":["report"]},{"url":"https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479932","tags":["report"]},{"url":"https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=487990","tags":["report"]},{"url":"https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=491787","tags":["report"]},{"url":"https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=493771","tags":["report"]},{"url":"https://security.access.redhat.com/data/csaf/v2/advisories/2009/rhsa-2009_0451.json","tags":["advisory"]},{"url":"https://access.redhat.com/security/cve/CVE-2008-4307","tags":["report"]},{"url":"https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2008-4307","tags":["advisory"]},{"url":"https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2008-4307","tags":["advisory"]},{"url":"https://access.redhat.com/security/cve/CVE-2009-0028","tags":["report"]},{"url":"https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2009-0028","tags":["advisory"]},{"url":"https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2009-0028","tags":["advisory"]},{"url":"https://access.redhat.com/security/cve/CVE-2009-0834","tags":["report"]},{"url":"https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2009-0834","tags":["advisory"]},{"url":"https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2009-0834","tags":["advisory"]},{"url":"https://access.redhat.com/security/cve/CVE-2009-0835","tags":["report"]},{"url":"https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2009-0835","tags":["advisory"]},{"url":"https://access.redhat.com/security/cve/CVE-2009-1046","tags":["report"]},{"url":"https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2009-1046","tags":["advisory"]},{"url":"https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2009-1046","tags":["advisory"]},{"url":"https://access.redhat.com/security/cve/CVE-2009-1337","tags":["report"]},{"url":"https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2009-1337","tags":["advisory"]},{"url":"https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2009-1337","tags":["advisory"]}],"sources":{"cve":[{"id":"CVE-2009-0835","description":"The __secure_computing function in kernel/seccomp.c in the seccomp subsystem in the Linux kernel 2.6.28.7 and earlier on the x86_64 platform, when CONFIG_SECCOMP is enabled, does not properly handle (1) a 32-bit process making a 64-bit syscall or (2) a 64-bit process making a 32-bit syscall, which allows local users to bypass intended access restrictions via crafted syscalls that are misinterpreted as (a) stat or (b) chmod, a related issue to CVE-2009-0342 and CVE-2009-0343.","status":"published","published":"2009-03-06T11:00:00Z","modified":"2024-08-07T04:48:52.37Z","updated_at":"2026-11-02T14:33:25.896677Z"}],"euvd":[{"id":"EUVD-2009-0832","description":"The __secure_computing function in kernel/seccomp.c in the seccomp subsystem in the Linux kernel 2.6.28.7 and earlier on the x86_64 platform, when CONFIG_SECCOMP is enabled, does not properly handle (1) a 32-bit process making a 64-bit syscall or (2) a 64-bit process making a 32-bit syscall, which allows local users to bypass intended access restrictions via crafted syscalls that are misinterpreted as (a) stat or (b) chmod, a related issue to CVE-2009-0342 and CVE-2009-0343.","status":"published","published":"2009-03-06T11:00:00Z","modified":"2024-08-07T04:48:52Z","updated_at":"2026-11-03T01:39:24.312317Z"}],"ghsa":[{"id":"GHSA-x75x-89gj-wfcm","title":"The __secure_computing function in kernel/seccomp.c in the seccomp subsystem in the Linux kernel...","description":"The __secure_computing function in kernel/seccomp.c in the seccomp subsystem in the Linux kernel 2.6.28.7 and earlier on the x86_64 platform, when CONFIG_SECCOMP is enabled, does not properly handle (1) a 32-bit process making a 64-bit syscall or (2) a 64-bit process making a 32-bit syscall, which allows local users to bypass intended access restrictions via crafted syscalls that are misinterpreted as (a) stat or (b) chmod, a related issue to CVE-2009-0342 and CVE-2009-0343.","status":"published","published":"2022-05-02T03:18:39Z","modified":"2023-01-31T05:06:55Z","updated_at":"2026-11-02T14:49:07.319467Z"}],"nvd":[{"id":"CVE-2009-0835","description":"The __secure_computing function in kernel/seccomp.c in the seccomp subsystem in the Linux kernel 2.6.28.7 and earlier on the x86_64 platform, when CONFIG_SECCOMP is enabled, does not properly handle (1) a 32-bit process making a 64-bit syscall or (2) a 64-bit process making a 32-bit syscall, which allows local users to bypass intended access restrictions via crafted syscalls that are misinterpreted as (a) stat or (b) chmod, a related issue to CVE-2009-0342 and CVE-2009-0343.","status":"published","published":"2009-03-06T11:30:02.657Z","modified":"2026-06-16T23:05:54.7Z","cvss":[{"version":"2.0","score":3.6,"vector":"AV:L/AC:L/Au:N/C:P/I:P/A:N","level":"low","assessor":"primary"}],"cwes":["CWE-264"],"updated_at":"2026-11-02T14:01:34.44527Z"}],"osv":[{"id":"DSA-1800-1","title":"linux-2.6 user-mode-linux - several vulnerabilities","status":"published","published":"2009-05-15T00:00:00Z","modified":"2026-03-09T01:19:08.249263Z","updated_at":"2026-11-02T15:46:14.734124Z"},{"id":"RHSA-2009:0451","title":"Red Hat Security Advisory: kernel-rt security and bug fix update","status":"published","published":"2024-09-13T06:45:05Z","modified":"2025-11-22T10:20:36Z","updated_at":"2026-11-02T15:53:00.468834Z"}]}}