{"id":"CVE-2010-3192","aliases":["EUVD-2010-3192","GHSA-388x-h72v-g58j","UBUNTU-CVE-2010-3192","openSUSE-SU-2024:10792-1"],"status":"published","title":"Certain run-time memory protection mechanisms in the GNU C Library (aka glibc or libc6) print...","description":"Certain run-time memory protection mechanisms in the GNU C Library (aka glibc or libc6) print argv[0] and backtrace information, which might allow context-dependent attackers to obtain sensitive information from process memory by executing an incorrect program, as demonstrated by a setuid program that contains a stack-based buffer overflow error, related to the __fortify_fail function in debug/fortify_fail.c, and the __stack_chk_fail (aka stack protection) and __chk_fail (aka FORTIFY_SOURCE) implementations.","severity":{"version":"2.0","score":5,"vector":"AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:P/I:N/A:N","level":"medium","assessor":"primary","from":"nvd"},"epss":{"day":"2026-11-09","score":0.01606,"percentile":0.76052,"model":"v2026.06.15"},"facts":{"in_kev":false,"known_exploited":false,"public_exploit":false,"fix_available":false},"cwes":["CWE-200"],"published":"2010-10-12T21:00:00Z","modified":"2026-06-16T23:22:20Z","affected":[{"source":"osv","ecosystem":"Ubuntu:Pro:14.04:LTS","package":"eglibc","ranges":[{"type":"ECOSYSTEM","events":[{"introduced":"0"}]}],"versions":["2.17-93ubuntu4","2.18-0ubuntu1","2.18-0ubuntu2","2.18-0ubuntu4","2.18-0ubuntu5","2.18-0ubuntu6","2.18-0ubuntu7","2.19-0ubuntu2","2.19-0ubuntu3","2.19-0ubuntu4","2.19-0ubuntu5","2.19-0ubuntu6","2.19-0ubuntu6.1","2.19-0ubuntu6.3","2.19-0ubuntu6.4","2.19-0ubuntu6.5","2.19-0ubuntu6.6","2.19-0ubuntu6.7","2.19-0ubuntu6.8","2.19-0ubuntu6.9","2.19-0ubuntu6.10","2.19-0ubuntu6.11","2.19-0ubuntu6.13","2.19-0ubuntu6.14","2.19-0ubuntu6.15","2.19-0ubuntu6.15+esm1","2.19-0ubuntu6.15+esm2","2.19-0ubuntu6.15+esm3","2.19-0ubuntu6.15+esm4"]},{"source":"osv","ecosystem":"Ubuntu:Pro:16.04:LTS","package":"glibc","ranges":[{"type":"ECOSYSTEM","events":[{"introduced":"0"}]}],"versions":["2.21-0ubuntu4","2.21-0ubuntu5","2.21-0ubuntu6","2.23-0ubuntu1","2.23-0ubuntu2","2.23-0ubuntu3","2.23-0ubuntu4","2.23-0ubuntu5","2.23-0ubuntu6","2.23-0ubuntu7","2.23-0ubuntu9","2.23-0ubuntu10","2.23-0ubuntu11","2.23-0ubuntu11.2","2.23-0ubuntu11.3","2.23-0ubuntu11.3+esm1","2.23-0ubuntu11.3+esm2","2.23-0ubuntu11.3+esm3","2.23-0ubuntu11.3+esm5","2.23-0ubuntu11.3+esm6","2.23-0ubuntu11.3+esm7","2.23-0ubuntu11.3+esm8","2.23-0ubuntu11.3+esm9"]},{"source":"osv","ecosystem":"openSUSE:Tumbleweed","package":"glibc","ranges":[{"type":"ECOSYSTEM","events":[{"introduced":"0"},{"fixed":"2.34-1.2"}]}],"bundled":34}],"products":[{"vendor":"gnu","product":"glibc"}],"references":[{"url":"http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2010/09/02/3","tags":["mailing-list","x_refsource_MLIST","x_transferred","Mailing List"]},{"url":"http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2010/09/02/5","tags":["mailing-list","x_refsource_MLIST","x_transferred","Mailing List"]},{"url":"http://seclists.org/fulldisclosure/2010/Apr/399","tags":["mailing-list","x_refsource_FULLDISC","x_transferred","Mailing List","Third Party Advisory","report"]},{"url":"http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2010/09/02/2","tags":["mailing-list","x_refsource_MLIST","x_transferred","Mailing List"]},{"url":"http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2010/08/31/7","tags":["mailing-list","x_refsource_MLIST","x_transferred","Mailing List"]},{"url":"http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2010/09/02/4","tags":["mailing-list","x_refsource_MLIST","x_transferred","Mailing List"]},{"url":"http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2010/08/31/6","tags":["mailing-list","x_refsource_MLIST","x_transferred","Mailing List"]},{"url":"http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2010/08/25/8","tags":["mailing-list","x_refsource_MLIST","x_transferred","Mailing List"]},{"url":"https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2010-3192"},{"url":"https://github.com/advisories/GHSA-388x-h72v-g58j"},{"url":"https://ubuntu.com/security/CVE-2010-3192","tags":["report"]},{"url":"https://sourceware.org/ml/libc-alpha/2017-08/msg00010.html","tags":["report"]},{"url":"https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2010-3192","tags":["report"]},{"url":"","tags":["advisory"]},{"url":"https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2009-5064","tags":["web"]},{"url":"https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2009-5155","tags":["web"]},{"url":"https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2010-3192","tags":["web"]},{"url":"https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2015-5180","tags":["web"]},{"url":"https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2016-10228","tags":["web"]},{"url":"https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2016-10739","tags":["web"]},{"url":"https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2016-6261","tags":["web"]},{"url":"https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2016-6323","tags":["web"]},{"url":"https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2017-1000366","tags":["web"]},{"url":"https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2017-1000408","tags":["web"]},{"url":"https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2017-12132","tags":["web"]},{"url":"https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2017-12133","tags":["web"]},{"url":"https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2017-15670","tags":["web"]},{"url":"https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2017-16997","tags":["web"]},{"url":"https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2017-17426","tags":["web"]},{"url":"https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2017-18269","tags":["web"]},{"url":"https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2018-1000001","tags":["web"]},{"url":"https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2018-11236","tags":["web"]},{"url":"https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2018-11237","tags":["web"]},{"url":"https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2018-19591","tags":["web"]},{"url":"https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2018-6485","tags":["web"]},{"url":"https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2019-19126","tags":["web"]},{"url":"https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2019-25013","tags":["web"]},{"url":"https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2019-7309","tags":["web"]},{"url":"https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2019-9169","tags":["web"]},{"url":"https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2020-10029","tags":["web"]},{"url":"https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2020-1752","tags":["web"]},{"url":"https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2020-27618","tags":["web"]},{"url":"https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2020-29562","tags":["web"]},{"url":"https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2020-29573","tags":["web"]},{"url":"https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2020-6096","tags":["web"]},{"url":"https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2021-27645","tags":["web"]},{"url":"https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2021-3326","tags":["web"]},{"url":"https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2021-33574","tags":["web"]}],"sources":{"cve":[{"id":"CVE-2010-3192","description":"Certain run-time memory protection mechanisms in the GNU C Library (aka glibc or libc6) print argv[0] and backtrace information, which might allow context-dependent attackers to obtain sensitive information from process memory by executing an incorrect program, as demonstrated by a setuid program that contains a stack-based buffer overflow error, related to the __fortify_fail function in debug/fortify_fail.c, and the __stack_chk_fail (aka stack protection) and __chk_fail (aka FORTIFY_SOURCE) implementations.","status":"published","published":"2010-10-12T21:00:00Z","modified":"2024-09-16T16:17:25.715Z","updated_at":"2026-11-02T14:33:27.354104Z"}],"euvd":[{"id":"EUVD-2010-3192","description":"Certain run-time memory protection mechanisms in the GNU C Library (aka glibc or libc6) print argv[0] and backtrace information, which might allow context-dependent attackers to obtain sensitive information from process memory by executing an incorrect program, as demonstrated by a setuid program that contains a stack-based buffer overflow error, related to the __fortify_fail function in debug/fortify_fail.c, and the __stack_chk_fail (aka stack protection) and __chk_fail (aka FORTIFY_SOURCE) implementations.","status":"published","published":"2010-10-12T21:00:00Z","modified":"2024-09-16T16:17:25Z","updated_at":"2026-11-03T00:55:53.554412Z"}],"ghsa":[{"id":"GHSA-388x-h72v-g58j","title":"Certain run-time memory protection mechanisms in the GNU C Library (aka glibc or libc6) print...","description":"Certain run-time memory protection mechanisms in the GNU C Library (aka glibc or libc6) print argv[0] and backtrace information, which might allow context-dependent attackers to obtain sensitive information from process memory by executing an incorrect program, as demonstrated by a setuid program that contains a stack-based buffer overflow error, related to the __fortify_fail function in debug/fortify_fail.c, and the __stack_chk_fail (aka stack protection) and __chk_fail (aka FORTIFY_SOURCE) implementations.","status":"published","published":"2022-05-13T01:27:30Z","modified":"2023-02-01T05:07:55Z","cwes":["CWE-200"],"updated_at":"2026-11-02T14:50:38.356016Z"}],"nvd":[{"id":"CVE-2010-3192","description":"Certain run-time memory protection mechanisms in the GNU C Library (aka glibc or libc6) print argv[0] and backtrace information, which might allow context-dependent attackers to obtain sensitive information from process memory by executing an incorrect program, as demonstrated by a setuid program that contains a stack-based buffer overflow error, related to the __fortify_fail function in debug/fortify_fail.c, and the __stack_chk_fail (aka stack protection) and __chk_fail (aka FORTIFY_SOURCE) implementations.","status":"published","published":"2010-10-14T05:58:06.833Z","modified":"2026-06-16T23:22:20.71Z","cvss":[{"version":"2.0","score":5,"vector":"AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:P/I:N/A:N","level":"medium","assessor":"primary"}],"cwes":["CWE-200"],"updated_at":"2026-11-02T14:01:57.065463Z"}],"osv":[{"id":"openSUSE-SU-2024:10792-1","title":"glibc-2.34-1.2 on GA media","description":"These are all security issues fixed in the glibc-2.34-1.2 package on the GA media of openSUSE Tumbleweed.","status":"published","published":"2024-06-15T00:00:00Z","modified":"2026-02-04T03:52:58.912445Z","updated_at":"2026-11-02T16:58:34.487567Z"},{"id":"UBUNTU-CVE-2010-3192","description":"Certain run-time memory protection mechanisms in the GNU C Library (aka glibc or libc6) print argv[0] and backtrace information, which might allow context-dependent attackers to obtain sensitive information from process memory by executing an incorrect program, as demonstrated by a setuid program that contains a stack-based buffer overflow error, related to the __fortify_fail function in debug/fortify_fail.c, and the __stack_chk_fail (aka stack protection) and __chk_fail (aka FORTIFY_SOURCE) implementations.","status":"published","published":"2010-10-14T05:58:00Z","modified":"2026-04-22T08:43:30.97669Z","updated_at":"2026-11-02T15:54:05.838224Z"}]}}