{"id":"CVE-2016-5672","aliases":["EUVD-2016-6616","GHSA-hv57-2phm-3w47"],"status":"published","title":"Intel Crosswalk before 19.49.514.5, 20.x before 20.50.533.11, 21.x before 21.51.546.0, and 22.x...","description":"Intel Crosswalk before 19.49.514.5, 20.x before 20.50.533.11, 21.x before 21.51.546.0, and 22.x before 22.51.549.0 interprets a user's acceptance of one invalid X.509 certificate to mean that all invalid X.509 certificates should be accepted without prompting, which makes it easier for man-in-the-middle attackers to spoof SSL servers and obtain sensitive information via a crafted certificate.","severity":{"version":"3.0","score":8.1,"vector":"CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N","level":"high","assessor":"primary","from":"nvd"},"epss":{"day":"2026-11-08","score":0.01736,"percentile":0.7784,"model":"v2026.06.15"},"facts":{"in_kev":false,"known_exploited":false,"public_exploit":false,"fix_available":false},"cwes":["CWE-20","CWE-310"],"published":"2016-08-01T01:00:00Z","modified":"2026-06-17T00:49:50Z","products":[{"vendor":"intel","product":"crosswalk"}],"references":[{"url":"https://blogs.intel.com/evangelists/2016/07/28/crosswalk-security-vulnerability/","tags":["x_refsource_CONFIRM","x_transferred","Vendor Advisory"]},{"url":"http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/92199","tags":["vdb-entry","x_refsource_BID","x_transferred","Third Party Advisory","VDB Entry"]},{"url":"https://wwws.nightwatchcybersecurity.com/2016/07/29/advisory-intel-crosswalk-ssl-prompt-issue","tags":["x_refsource_MISC","x_transferred","Third Party Advisory"]},{"url":"https://crosswalk-project.org/jira/browse/XWALK-6986","tags":["x_refsource_MISC","x_transferred","Permissions Required","Technical Description"]},{"url":"http://packetstormsecurity.com/files/138107/Intel-Crosswalk-Project-Man-In-The-Middle.html","tags":["x_refsource_MISC","x_transferred","Third Party Advisory","VDB Entry"]},{"url":"https://lists.crosswalk-project.org/pipermail/crosswalk-help/2016-July/002167.html","tags":["mailing-list","x_refsource_MLIST","x_transferred","Vendor Advisory"]},{"url":"http://www.securityfocus.com/archive/1/539051/100/0/threaded","tags":["mailing-list","x_refsource_BUGTRAQ","x_transferred"]},{"url":"http://www.kb.cert.org/vuls/id/217871","tags":["third-party-advisory","x_refsource_CERT-VN","x_transferred","Third Party Advisory","US Government Resource"]},{"url":"https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2016-5672"},{"url":"https://blogs.intel.com/evangelists/2016/07/28/crosswalk-security-vulnerability"},{"url":"https://github.com/advisories/GHSA-hv57-2phm-3w47"}],"sources":{"cve":[{"id":"CVE-2016-5672","description":"Intel Crosswalk before 19.49.514.5, 20.x before 20.50.533.11, 21.x before 21.51.546.0, and 22.x before 22.51.549.0 interprets a user's acceptance of one invalid X.509 certificate to mean that all invalid X.509 certificates should be accepted without prompting, which makes it easier for man-in-the-middle attackers to spoof SSL servers and obtain sensitive information via a crafted certificate.","status":"published","published":"2016-08-01T01:00:00Z","modified":"2024-08-06T01:08:00.524Z","updated_at":"2026-11-02T14:33:30.767029Z"}],"euvd":[{"id":"EUVD-2016-6616","description":"Intel Crosswalk before 19.49.514.5, 20.x before 20.50.533.11, 21.x before 21.51.546.0, and 22.x before 22.51.549.0 interprets a user's acceptance of one invalid X.509 certificate to mean that all invalid X.509 certificates should be accepted without prompting, which makes it easier for man-in-the-middle attackers to spoof SSL servers and obtain sensitive information via a crafted certificate.","status":"published","published":"2016-08-01T01:00:00Z","modified":"2024-08-06T01:08:00Z","updated_at":"2026-11-03T02:22:42.006781Z"}],"ghsa":[{"id":"GHSA-hv57-2phm-3w47","title":"Intel Crosswalk before 19.49.514.5, 20.x before 20.50.533.11, 21.x before 21.51.546.0, and 22.x...","description":"Intel Crosswalk before 19.49.514.5, 20.x before 20.50.533.11, 21.x before 21.51.546.0, and 22.x before 22.51.549.0 interprets a user's acceptance of one invalid X.509 certificate to mean that all invalid X.509 certificates should be accepted without prompting, which makes it easier for man-in-the-middle attackers to spoof SSL servers and obtain sensitive information via a crafted certificate.","status":"published","published":"2022-05-14T02:46:13Z","modified":"2025-04-12T13:02:57Z","cvss":[{"version":"3.0","score":8.1,"vector":"CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N","level":"high"}],"cwes":["CWE-20"],"updated_at":"2026-11-02T15:01:28.663035Z"}],"nvd":[{"id":"CVE-2016-5672","description":"Intel Crosswalk before 19.49.514.5, 20.x before 20.50.533.11, 21.x before 21.51.546.0, and 22.x before 22.51.549.0 interprets a user's acceptance of one invalid X.509 certificate to mean that all invalid X.509 certificates should be accepted without prompting, which makes it easier for man-in-the-middle attackers to spoof SSL servers and obtain sensitive information via a crafted certificate.","status":"published","published":"2016-08-01T02:59:17.87Z","modified":"2026-06-17T00:49:50.933Z","cvss":[{"version":"3.0","score":8.1,"vector":"CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N","level":"high","assessor":"primary"},{"version":"2.0","score":5.8,"vector":"AV:N/AC:M/Au:N/C:P/I:P/A:N","level":"medium","assessor":"primary"}],"cwes":["CWE-20","CWE-310"],"updated_at":"2026-11-02T14:03:28.854267Z"}]}}