{"id":"CVE-2017-14343","aliases":["DEBIAN-CVE-2017-14343","EUVD-2017-5846","GHSA-gqrj-6wmm-3f3c","SUSE-SU-2018:0017-1","SUSE-SU-2018:0043-1","SUSE-SU-2018:0197-1","SUSE-SU-2018:0864-1","SUSE-SU-2018:0880-1","UBUNTU-CVE-2017-14343","USN-3681-1"],"status":"published","title":"ImageMagick 7.0.6-6 has a memory leak vulnerability in ReadXCFImage in coders/xcf.c via a crafted...","description":"ImageMagick 7.0.6-6 has a memory leak vulnerability in ReadXCFImage in coders/xcf.c via a crafted xcf image file.","severity":{"version":"3.0","score":6.5,"vector":"CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H","level":"medium","assessor":"primary","from":"nvd"},"epss":{"day":"2026-11-08","score":0.01388,"percentile":0.72444,"model":"v2026.06.15"},"facts":{"in_kev":false,"known_exploited":false,"public_exploit":false,"fix_available":true},"cwes":["CWE-772"],"published":"2017-09-12T00:00:00Z","modified":"2026-10-24T10:49:17Z","fixes":[{"ecosystem":"Debian:12","package":"imagemagick","fixed_in":["8:6.9.9.34+dfsg-3"],"sources":["osv"]},{"ecosystem":"Debian:13","package":"imagemagick","fixed_in":["8:6.9.9.34+dfsg-3"],"sources":["osv"]},{"ecosystem":"Debian:14","package":"imagemagick","fixed_in":["8:6.9.9.34+dfsg-3"],"sources":["osv"]},{"ecosystem":"Ubuntu:14.04:LTS","package":"imagemagick","fixed_in":["8:6.7.7.10-6ubuntu3.11"],"sources":["osv"]},{"ecosystem":"Ubuntu:16.04:LTS","package":"imagemagick","fixed_in":["8:6.8.9.9-7ubuntu5.11"],"sources":["osv"]},{"ecosystem":"Ubuntu:18.04:LTS","package":"imagemagick","fixed_in":["8:6.9.7.4+dfsg-16ubuntu6.2"],"sources":["osv"]}],"affected":[{"source":"osv","ecosystem":"Debian:12","package":"imagemagick","ranges":[{"type":"ECOSYSTEM","events":[{"introduced":"0"},{"fixed":"8:6.9.9.34+dfsg-3"}]}]},{"source":"osv","ecosystem":"Debian:13","package":"imagemagick","ranges":[{"type":"ECOSYSTEM","events":[{"introduced":"0"},{"fixed":"8:6.9.9.34+dfsg-3"}]}]},{"source":"osv","ecosystem":"Debian:14","package":"imagemagick","ranges":[{"type":"ECOSYSTEM","events":[{"introduced":"0"},{"fixed":"8:6.9.9.34+dfsg-3"}]}]},{"source":"osv","ecosystem":"SUSE:Linux Enterprise Desktop 12 SP2","package":"ImageMagick","ranges":[{"type":"ECOSYSTEM","events":[{"introduced":"0"},{"fixed":"6.8.8.1-71.20.1"}]}],"bundled":9},{"source":"osv","ecosystem":"SUSE:Linux Enterprise Desktop 12 SP3","package":"ImageMagick","ranges":[{"type":"ECOSYSTEM","events":[{"introduced":"0"},{"fixed":"6.8.8.1-71.20.1"}]}],"bundled":9},{"source":"osv","ecosystem":"SUSE:Linux Enterprise Server for Raspberry Pi 12 SP2","package":"ImageMagick","ranges":[{"type":"ECOSYSTEM","events":[{"introduced":"0"},{"fixed":"6.8.8.1-71.20.1"}]}],"bundled":9},{"source":"osv","ecosystem":"SUSE:Linux Enterprise Software Development Kit 12 SP2","package":"ImageMagick","ranges":[{"type":"ECOSYSTEM","events":[{"introduced":"0"},{"fixed":"6.8.8.1-71.20.1"}]}],"bundled":9},{"source":"osv","ecosystem":"SUSE:Linux Enterprise Software Development Kit 12 SP3","package":"ImageMagick","ranges":[{"type":"ECOSYSTEM","events":[{"introduced":"0"},{"fixed":"6.8.8.1-71.20.1"}]}],"bundled":9},{"source":"osv","ecosystem":"SUSE:Linux Enterprise Server 12 SP2","package":"ImageMagick","ranges":[{"type":"ECOSYSTEM","events":[{"introduced":"0"},{"fixed":"6.8.8.1-71.20.1"}]}],"bundled":9},{"source":"osv","ecosystem":"SUSE:Linux Enterprise Server for SAP Applications 12 SP2","package":"ImageMagick","ranges":[{"type":"ECOSYSTEM","events":[{"introduced":"0"},{"fixed":"6.8.8.1-71.20.1"}]}],"bundled":9},{"source":"osv","ecosystem":"SUSE:Linux Enterprise Server 12 SP3","package":"ImageMagick","ranges":[{"type":"ECOSYSTEM","events":[{"introduced":"0"},{"fixed":"6.8.8.1-71.20.1"}]}],"bundled":9},{"source":"osv","ecosystem":"SUSE:Linux Enterprise Server for SAP Applications 12 SP3","package":"ImageMagick","ranges":[{"type":"ECOSYSTEM","events":[{"introduced":"0"},{"fixed":"6.8.8.1-71.20.1"}]}],"bundled":9},{"source":"osv","ecosystem":"SUSE:Linux Enterprise Workstation Extension 12 SP2","package":"ImageMagick","ranges":[{"type":"ECOSYSTEM","events":[{"introduced":"0"},{"fixed":"6.8.8.1-71.20.1"}]}],"bundled":9},{"source":"osv","ecosystem":"SUSE:Linux Enterprise Workstation Extension 12 SP3","package":"ImageMagick","ranges":[{"type":"ECOSYSTEM","events":[{"introduced":"0"},{"fixed":"6.8.8.1-71.20.1"}]}],"bundled":9},{"source":"osv","ecosystem":"SUSE:Linux Enterprise Software Development Kit 11 SP4","package":"ImageMagick","ranges":[{"type":"ECOSYSTEM","events":[{"introduced":"0"},{"fixed":"6.4.3.6-7.78.17.1"}]}],"bundled":9},{"source":"osv","ecosystem":"SUSE:Linux Enterprise Server 11 SP4","package":"ImageMagick","ranges":[{"type":"ECOSYSTEM","events":[{"introduced":"0"},{"fixed":"6.4.3.6-7.78.17.1"}]}],"bundled":9},{"source":"osv","ecosystem":"SUSE:Linux Enterprise Server for SAP Applications 11 SP4","package":"ImageMagick","ranges":[{"type":"ECOSYSTEM","events":[{"introduced":"0"},{"fixed":"6.4.3.6-7.78.17.1"}]}],"bundled":9},{"source":"osv","ecosystem":"SUSE:Linux Enterprise Software Development Kit 11 SP4","package":"GraphicsMagick","ranges":[{"type":"ECOSYSTEM","events":[{"introduced":"0"},{"fixed":"1.2.5-4.78.28.2"}]}],"bundled":23},{"source":"osv","ecosystem":"SUSE:Studio Onsite 1.3","package":"GraphicsMagick","ranges":[{"type":"ECOSYSTEM","events":[{"introduced":"0"},{"fixed":"1.2.5-4.78.28.2"}]}],"bundled":23},{"source":"osv","ecosystem":"SUSE:Linux Enterprise Software Development Kit 11 SP4","package":"GraphicsMagick","ranges":[{"type":"ECOSYSTEM","events":[{"introduced":"0"},{"fixed":"1.2.5-78.44.1"}]}],"bundled":13},{"source":"osv","ecosystem":"SUSE:Studio Onsite 1.3","package":"GraphicsMagick","ranges":[{"type":"ECOSYSTEM","events":[{"introduced":"0"},{"fixed":"1.2.5-78.44.1"}]}],"bundled":13},{"source":"osv","ecosystem":"SUSE:Linux Enterprise Software Development Kit 11 SP4","package":"ImageMagick","ranges":[{"type":"ECOSYSTEM","events":[{"introduced":"0"},{"fixed":"6.4.3.6-78.40.1"}]}],"bundled":16},{"source":"osv","ecosystem":"SUSE:Linux Enterprise Server 11 SP4","package":"ImageMagick","ranges":[{"type":"ECOSYSTEM","events":[{"introduced":"0"},{"fixed":"6.4.3.6-78.40.1"}]}],"bundled":16},{"source":"osv","ecosystem":"SUSE:Linux Enterprise Server for SAP Applications 11 SP4","package":"ImageMagick","ranges":[{"type":"ECOSYSTEM","events":[{"introduced":"0"},{"fixed":"6.4.3.6-78.40.1"}]}],"bundled":16},{"source":"osv","ecosystem":"Ubuntu:14.04:LTS","package":"imagemagick","ranges":[{"type":"ECOSYSTEM","events":[{"introduced":"0"},{"fixed":"8:6.7.7.10-6ubuntu3.11"}]}],"versions":["8:6.7.7.10-5ubuntu3","8:6.7.7.10-5ubuntu4","8:6.7.7.10-6ubuntu1","8:6.7.7.10-6ubuntu2","8:6.7.7.10-6ubuntu3","8:6.7.7.10-6ubuntu3.1","8:6.7.7.10-6ubuntu3.2","8:6.7.7.10-6ubuntu3.3","8:6.7.7.10-6ubuntu3.4","8:6.7.7.10-6ubuntu3.5","8:6.7.7.10-6ubuntu3.6","8:6.7.7.10-6ubuntu3.7","8:6.7.7.10-6ubuntu3.8","8:6.7.7.10-6ubuntu3.9"]},{"source":"osv","ecosystem":"Ubuntu:16.04:LTS","package":"imagemagick","ranges":[{"type":"ECOSYSTEM","events":[{"introduced":"0"},{"fixed":"8:6.8.9.9-7ubuntu5.11"}]}],"versions":["8:6.8.9.9-5ubuntu2","8:6.8.9.9-6","8:6.8.9.9-6build1","8:6.8.9.9-7","8:6.8.9.9-7ubuntu1","8:6.8.9.9-7ubuntu2","8:6.8.9.9-7ubuntu3","8:6.8.9.9-7ubuntu4","8:6.8.9.9-7ubuntu5","8:6.8.9.9-7ubuntu5.1","8:6.8.9.9-7ubuntu5.2","8:6.8.9.9-7ubuntu5.3","8:6.8.9.9-7ubuntu5.4","8:6.8.9.9-7ubuntu5.5","8:6.8.9.9-7ubuntu5.6","8:6.8.9.9-7ubuntu5.7","8:6.8.9.9-7ubuntu5.8","8:6.8.9.9-7ubuntu5.9"]},{"source":"osv","ecosystem":"Ubuntu:18.04:LTS","package":"imagemagick","ranges":[{"type":"ECOSYSTEM","events":[{"introduced":"0"},{"fixed":"8:6.9.7.4+dfsg-16ubuntu6.2"}]}],"versions":["8:6.9.7.4+dfsg-16ubuntu2","8:6.9.7.4+dfsg-16ubuntu3","8:6.9.7.4+dfsg-16ubuntu4","8:6.9.7.4+dfsg-16ubuntu5","8:6.9.7.4+dfsg-16ubuntu6"]},{"source":"osv","ecosystem":"Ubuntu:14.04:LTS","package":"imagemagick","ranges":[{"type":"ECOSYSTEM","events":[{"introduced":"0"},{"fixed":"8:6.7.7.10-6ubuntu3.11"}]}],"versions":["8:6.7.7.10-5ubuntu3","8:6.7.7.10-5ubuntu4","8:6.7.7.10-6ubuntu1","8:6.7.7.10-6ubuntu2","8:6.7.7.10-6ubuntu3","8:6.7.7.10-6ubuntu3.1","8:6.7.7.10-6ubuntu3.2","8:6.7.7.10-6ubuntu3.3","8:6.7.7.10-6ubuntu3.4","8:6.7.7.10-6ubuntu3.5","8:6.7.7.10-6ubuntu3.6","8:6.7.7.10-6ubuntu3.7","8:6.7.7.10-6ubuntu3.8","8:6.7.7.10-6ubuntu3.9"],"bundled":124},{"source":"osv","ecosystem":"Ubuntu:16.04:LTS","package":"imagemagick","ranges":[{"type":"ECOSYSTEM","events":[{"introduced":"0"},{"fixed":"8:6.8.9.9-7ubuntu5.11"}]}],"versions":["8:6.8.9.9-5ubuntu2","8:6.8.9.9-6","8:6.8.9.9-6build1","8:6.8.9.9-7","8:6.8.9.9-7ubuntu1","8:6.8.9.9-7ubuntu2","8:6.8.9.9-7ubuntu3","8:6.8.9.9-7ubuntu4","8:6.8.9.9-7ubuntu5","8:6.8.9.9-7ubuntu5.1","8:6.8.9.9-7ubuntu5.2","8:6.8.9.9-7ubuntu5.3","8:6.8.9.9-7ubuntu5.4","8:6.8.9.9-7ubuntu5.5","8:6.8.9.9-7ubuntu5.6","8:6.8.9.9-7ubuntu5.7","8:6.8.9.9-7ubuntu5.8","8:6.8.9.9-7ubuntu5.9"],"bundled":124},{"source":"osv","ecosystem":"Ubuntu:18.04:LTS","package":"imagemagick","ranges":[{"type":"ECOSYSTEM","events":[{"introduced":"0"},{"fixed":"8:6.9.7.4+dfsg-16ubuntu6.2"}]}],"versions":["8:6.9.7.4+dfsg-16ubuntu2","8:6.9.7.4+dfsg-16ubuntu3","8:6.9.7.4+dfsg-16ubuntu4","8:6.9.7.4+dfsg-16ubuntu5","8:6.9.7.4+dfsg-16ubuntu6"],"bundled":124}],"products":[{"vendor":"canonical","product":"ubuntu_linux"},{"vendor":"imagemagick","product":"imagemagick"}],"references":[{"url":"https://usn.ubuntu.com/3681-1/","tags":["vendor-advisory","x_refsource_UBUNTU","x_transferred","Third Party Advisory","advisory"]},{"url":"https://github.com/ImageMagick/ImageMagick/issues/649","tags":["x_refsource_CONFIRM","x_transferred","Exploit","Patch","Third Party Advisory","fix"]},{"url":"https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2017-14343"},{"url":"https://usn.ubuntu.com/3681-1"},{"url":"https://github.com/advisories/GHSA-gqrj-6wmm-3f3c"},{"url":"https://security-tracker.debian.org/tracker/CVE-2017-14343","tags":["advisory"]},{"url":"https://www.suse.com/support/update/announcement/2018/suse-su-20180017-1/","tags":["advisory"]},{"url":"https://bugzilla.suse.com/1052460","tags":["report"]},{"url":"https://bugzilla.suse.com/1055053","tags":["report"]},{"url":"https://bugzilla.suse.com/1055063","tags":["report"]},{"url":"https://bugzilla.suse.com/1056550","tags":["report"]},{"url":"https://bugzilla.suse.com/1057723","tags":["report"]},{"url":"https://bugzilla.suse.com/1058422","tags":["report"]},{"url":"https://bugzilla.suse.com/1063049","tags":["report"]},{"url":"https://bugzilla.suse.com/1063050","tags":["report"]},{"url":"https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2017-12563","tags":["web"]},{"url":"https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2017-12691","tags":["web"]},{"url":"https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2017-13061","tags":["web"]},{"url":"https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2017-13062","tags":["web"]},{"url":"https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2017-14042","tags":["web"]},{"url":"https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2017-14174","tags":["web"]},{"url":"https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2017-14343","tags":["web"]},{"url":"https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2017-15277","tags":["web"]},{"url":"https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2017-15281","tags":["web"]},{"url":"https://www.suse.com/support/update/announcement/2018/suse-su-20180043-1/","tags":["advisory"]},{"url":"https://www.suse.com/support/update/announcement/2018/suse-su-20180197-1/","tags":["advisory"]},{"url":"https://bugzilla.suse.com/1047044","tags":["report"]},{"url":"https://bugzilla.suse.com/1047054","tags":["report"]},{"url":"https://bugzilla.suse.com/1048457","tags":["report"]},{"url":"https://bugzilla.suse.com/1049373","tags":["report"]},{"url":"https://bugzilla.suse.com/1050129","tags":["report"]},{"url":"https://bugzilla.suse.com/1051412","tags":["report"]},{"url":"https://bugzilla.suse.com/1051847","tags":["report"]},{"url":"https://bugzilla.suse.com/1052252","tags":["report"]},{"url":"https://bugzilla.suse.com/1052758","tags":["report"]},{"url":"https://bugzilla.suse.com/1052764","tags":["report"]},{"url":"https://bugzilla.suse.com/1052771","tags":["report"]},{"url":"https://bugzilla.suse.com/1058082","tags":["report"]},{"url":"https://bugzilla.suse.com/1060577","tags":["report"]},{"url":"https://bugzilla.suse.com/1061587","tags":["report"]},{"url":"https://bugzilla.suse.com/1067177","tags":["report"]},{"url":"https://bugzilla.suse.com/1074969","tags":["report"]},{"url":"https://bugzilla.suse.com/1074975","tags":["report"]},{"url":"https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2017-10799","tags":["web"]},{"url":"https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2017-10800","tags":["web"]},{"url":"https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2017-11188","tags":["web"]},{"url":"https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2017-11449","tags":["web"]},{"url":"https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2017-11532","tags":["web"]},{"url":"https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2017-12140","tags":["web"]},{"url":"https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2017-12430","tags":["web"]},{"url":"https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2017-12642","tags":["web"]},{"url":"https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2017-12644","tags":["web"]},{"url":"https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2017-12662","tags":["web"]},{"url":"https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2017-14249","tags":["web"]},{"url":"https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2017-14733","tags":["web"]},{"url":"https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2017-14994","tags":["web"]},{"url":"https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2017-16547","tags":["web"]},{"url":"https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2017-18022","tags":["web"]},{"url":"https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2018-5247","tags":["web"]},{"url":"https://www.suse.com/support/update/announcement/2018/suse-su-20180864-1/","tags":["advisory"]},{"url":"https://bugzilla.suse.com/1050087","tags":["report"]},{"url":"https://bugzilla.suse.com/1058630","tags":["report"]},{"url":"https://bugzilla.suse.com/1059735","tags":["report"]},{"url":"https://bugzilla.suse.com/1066168","tags":["report"]},{"url":"https://bugzilla.suse.com/1066170","tags":["report"]},{"url":"https://bugzilla.suse.com/1082283","tags":["report"]},{"url":"https://bugzilla.suse.com/1082291","tags":["report"]},{"url":"https://bugzilla.suse.com/1082348","tags":["report"]},{"url":"https://bugzilla.suse.com/1084060","tags":["report"]},{"url":"https://bugzilla.suse.com/1084062","tags":["report"]},{"url":"https://bugzilla.suse.com/1085233","tags":["report"]},{"url":"https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2017-11524","tags":["web"]},{"url":"https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2017-12693","tags":["web"]},{"url":"https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2017-14314","tags":["web"]},{"url":"https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2017-14505","tags":["web"]},{"url":"https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2017-15016","tags":["web"]},{"url":"https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2017-15017","tags":["web"]},{"url":"https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2017-16352","tags":["web"]},{"url":"https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2017-16353","tags":["web"]},{"url":"https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2017-18219","tags":["web"]},{"url":"https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2017-18220","tags":["web"]},{"url":"https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2017-18230","tags":["web"]},{"url":"https://www.suse.com/support/update/announcement/2018/suse-su-20180880-1/","tags":["advisory"]},{"url":"https://bugzilla.suse.com/1043290","tags":["report"]},{"url":"https://bugzilla.suse.com/1056434","tags":["report"]},{"url":"https://bugzilla.suse.com/1082362","tags":["report"]},{"url":"https://bugzilla.suse.com/1082792","tags":["report"]},{"url":"https://bugzilla.suse.com/1086011","tags":["report"]},{"url":"https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2017-12692","tags":["web"]},{"url":"https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2017-13768","tags":["web"]},{"url":"https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2017-9500","tags":["web"]},{"url":"https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2018-7443","tags":["web"]},{"url":"https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2018-8804","tags":["web"]},{"url":"https://ubuntu.com/security/CVE-2017-14343","tags":["report"]},{"url":"https://ubuntu.com/security/notices/USN-3681-1","tags":["advisory"]},{"url":"https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2017-14343","tags":["report"]},{"url":"https://ubuntu.com/security/CVE-2017-10995","tags":["report"]},{"url":"https://ubuntu.com/security/CVE-2017-11352","tags":["report"]},{"url":"https://ubuntu.com/security/CVE-2017-11533","tags":["report"]},{"url":"https://ubuntu.com/security/CVE-2017-11535","tags":["report"]},{"url":"https://ubuntu.com/security/CVE-2017-11537","tags":["report"]},{"url":"https://ubuntu.com/security/CVE-2017-11639","tags":["report"]},{"url":"https://ubuntu.com/security/CVE-2017-11640","tags":["report"]},{"url":"https://ubuntu.com/security/CVE-2017-12140","tags":["report"]},{"url":"https://ubuntu.com/security/CVE-2017-12418","tags":["report"]},{"url":"https://ubuntu.com/security/CVE-2017-12429","tags":["report"]},{"url":"https://ubuntu.com/security/CVE-2017-12430","tags":["report"]},{"url":"https://ubuntu.com/security/CVE-2017-12431","tags":["report"]},{"url":"https://ubuntu.com/security/CVE-2017-12432","tags":["report"]},{"url":"https://ubuntu.com/security/CVE-2017-12433","tags":["report"]},{"url":"https://ubuntu.com/security/CVE-2017-12435","tags":["report"]},{"url":"https://ubuntu.com/security/CVE-2017-12563","tags":["report"]},{"url":"https://ubuntu.com/security/CVE-2017-12587","tags":["report"]},{"url":"https://ubuntu.com/security/CVE-2017-12640","tags":["report"]},{"url":"https://ubuntu.com/security/CVE-2017-12643","tags":["report"]},{"url":"https://ubuntu.com/security/CVE-2017-12644","tags":["report"]},{"url":"https://ubuntu.com/security/CVE-2017-12670","tags":["report"]},{"url":"https://ubuntu.com/security/CVE-2017-12674","tags":["report"]},{"url":"https://ubuntu.com/security/CVE-2017-12691","tags":["report"]},{"url":"https://ubuntu.com/security/CVE-2017-12692","tags":["report"]},{"url":"https://ubuntu.com/security/CVE-2017-12693","tags":["report"]},{"url":"https://ubuntu.com/security/CVE-2017-12875","tags":["report"]},{"url":"https://ubuntu.com/security/CVE-2017-12877","tags":["report"]},{"url":"https://ubuntu.com/security/CVE-2017-12983","tags":["report"]},{"url":"https://ubuntu.com/security/CVE-2017-13058","tags":["report"]},{"url":"https://ubuntu.com/security/CVE-2017-13059","tags":["report"]},{"url":"https://ubuntu.com/security/CVE-2017-13060","tags":["report"]},{"url":"https://ubuntu.com/security/CVE-2017-13061","tags":["report"]},{"url":"https://ubuntu.com/security/CVE-2017-13062","tags":["report"]},{"url":"https://ubuntu.com/security/CVE-2017-13131","tags":["report"]},{"url":"https://ubuntu.com/security/CVE-2017-13134","tags":["report"]},{"url":"https://ubuntu.com/security/CVE-2017-13139","tags":["report"]},{"url":"https://ubuntu.com/security/CVE-2017-13142","tags":["report"]},{"url":"https://ubuntu.com/security/CVE-2017-13143","tags":["report"]},{"url":"https://ubuntu.com/security/CVE-2017-13144","tags":["report"]},{"url":"https://ubuntu.com/security/CVE-2017-13145","tags":["report"]},{"url":"https://ubuntu.com/security/CVE-2017-13758","tags":["report"]},{"url":"https://ubuntu.com/security/CVE-2017-13768","tags":["report"]},{"url":"https://ubuntu.com/security/CVE-2017-13769","tags":["report"]},{"url":"https://ubuntu.com/security/CVE-2017-14060","tags":["report"]},{"url":"https://ubuntu.com/security/CVE-2017-14172","tags":["report"]},{"url":"https://ubuntu.com/security/CVE-2017-14173","tags":["report"]},{"url":"https://ubuntu.com/security/CVE-2017-14174","tags":["report"]},{"url":"https://ubuntu.com/security/CVE-2017-14175","tags":["report"]},{"url":"https://ubuntu.com/security/CVE-2017-14224","tags":["report"]},{"url":"https://ubuntu.com/security/CVE-2017-14249","tags":["report"]},{"url":"https://ubuntu.com/security/CVE-2017-14325","tags":["report"]},{"url":"https://ubuntu.com/security/CVE-2017-14326","tags":["report"]},{"url":"https://ubuntu.com/security/CVE-2017-14341","tags":["report"]},{"url":"https://ubuntu.com/security/CVE-2017-14342","tags":["report"]},{"url":"https://ubuntu.com/security/CVE-2017-14400","tags":["report"]},{"url":"https://ubuntu.com/security/CVE-2017-14505","tags":["report"]},{"url":"https://ubuntu.com/security/CVE-2017-14531","tags":["report"]},{"url":"https://ubuntu.com/security/CVE-2017-14532","tags":["report"]},{"url":"https://ubuntu.com/security/CVE-2017-14533","tags":["report"]},{"url":"https://ubuntu.com/security/CVE-2017-14607","tags":["report"]},{"url":"https://ubuntu.com/security/CVE-2017-14624","tags":["report"]},{"url":"https://ubuntu.com/security/CVE-2017-14625","tags":["report"]},{"url":"https://ubuntu.com/security/CVE-2017-14626","tags":["report"]},{"url":"https://ubuntu.com/security/CVE-2017-14682","tags":["report"]},{"url":"https://ubuntu.com/security/CVE-2017-14684","tags":["report"]},{"url":"https://ubuntu.com/security/CVE-2017-14739","tags":["report"]},{"url":"https://ubuntu.com/security/CVE-2017-14741","tags":["report"]},{"url":"https://ubuntu.com/security/CVE-2017-14989","tags":["report"]},{"url":"https://ubuntu.com/security/CVE-2017-15015","tags":["report"]},{"url":"https://ubuntu.com/security/CVE-2017-15016","tags":["report"]},{"url":"https://ubuntu.com/security/CVE-2017-15017","tags":["report"]},{"url":"https://ubuntu.com/security/CVE-2017-15032","tags":["report"]},{"url":"https://ubuntu.com/security/CVE-2017-15033","tags":["report"]},{"url":"https://ubuntu.com/security/CVE-2017-15217","tags":["report"]},{"url":"https://ubuntu.com/security/CVE-2017-15218","tags":["report"]},{"url":"https://ubuntu.com/security/CVE-2017-15277","tags":["report"]},{"url":"https://ubuntu.com/security/CVE-2017-15281","tags":["report"]},{"url":"https://ubuntu.com/security/CVE-2017-16546","tags":["report"]},{"url":"https://ubuntu.com/security/CVE-2017-17499","tags":["report"]},{"url":"https://ubuntu.com/security/CVE-2017-17504","tags":["report"]},{"url":"https://ubuntu.com/security/CVE-2017-17680","tags":["report"]},{"url":"https://ubuntu.com/security/CVE-2017-17681","tags":["report"]},{"url":"https://ubuntu.com/security/CVE-2017-17682","tags":["report"]},{"url":"https://ubuntu.com/security/CVE-2017-17879","tags":["report"]},{"url":"https://ubuntu.com/security/CVE-2017-17881","tags":["report"]},{"url":"https://ubuntu.com/security/CVE-2017-17882","tags":["report"]},{"url":"https://ubuntu.com/security/CVE-2017-17884","tags":["report"]},{"url":"https://ubuntu.com/security/CVE-2017-17885","tags":["report"]},{"url":"https://ubuntu.com/security/CVE-2017-17886","tags":["report"]},{"url":"https://ubuntu.com/security/CVE-2017-17887","tags":["report"]},{"url":"https://ubuntu.com/security/CVE-2017-17914","tags":["report"]},{"url":"https://ubuntu.com/security/CVE-2017-17934","tags":["report"]},{"url":"https://ubuntu.com/security/CVE-2017-18008","tags":["report"]},{"url":"https://ubuntu.com/security/CVE-2017-18022","tags":["report"]},{"url":"https://ubuntu.com/security/CVE-2017-18027","tags":["report"]},{"url":"https://ubuntu.com/security/CVE-2017-18028","tags":["report"]},{"url":"https://ubuntu.com/security/CVE-2017-18029","tags":["report"]},{"url":"https://ubuntu.com/security/CVE-2017-18209","tags":["report"]},{"url":"https://ubuntu.com/security/CVE-2017-18211","tags":["report"]},{"url":"https://ubuntu.com/security/CVE-2017-18251","tags":["report"]},{"url":"https://ubuntu.com/security/CVE-2017-18252","tags":["report"]},{"url":"https://ubuntu.com/security/CVE-2017-18254","tags":["report"]},{"url":"https://ubuntu.com/security/CVE-2017-18271","tags":["report"]},{"url":"https://ubuntu.com/security/CVE-2017-18273","tags":["report"]},{"url":"https://ubuntu.com/security/CVE-2017-1000445","tags":["report"]},{"url":"https://ubuntu.com/security/CVE-2017-1000476","tags":["report"]},{"url":"https://ubuntu.com/security/CVE-2018-5246","tags":["report"]},{"url":"https://ubuntu.com/security/CVE-2018-5247","tags":["report"]},{"url":"https://ubuntu.com/security/CVE-2018-5248","tags":["report"]},{"url":"https://ubuntu.com/security/CVE-2018-5357","tags":["report"]},{"url":"https://ubuntu.com/security/CVE-2018-5358","tags":["report"]},{"url":"https://ubuntu.com/security/CVE-2018-6405","tags":["report"]},{"url":"https://ubuntu.com/security/CVE-2018-7443","tags":["report"]},{"url":"https://ubuntu.com/security/CVE-2018-8804","tags":["report"]},{"url":"https://ubuntu.com/security/CVE-2018-8960","tags":["report"]},{"url":"https://ubuntu.com/security/CVE-2018-9133","tags":["report"]},{"url":"https://ubuntu.com/security/CVE-2018-10177","tags":["report"]},{"url":"https://ubuntu.com/security/CVE-2018-10804","tags":["report"]},{"url":"https://ubuntu.com/security/CVE-2018-10805","tags":["report"]},{"url":"https://ubuntu.com/security/CVE-2018-11251","tags":["report"]},{"url":"https://ubuntu.com/security/CVE-2018-11625","tags":["report"]},{"url":"https://ubuntu.com/security/CVE-2018-11655","tags":["report"]},{"url":"https://ubuntu.com/security/CVE-2018-11656","tags":["report"]}],"sources":{"cve":[{"id":"CVE-2017-14343","description":"ImageMagick 7.0.6-6 has a memory leak vulnerability in ReadXCFImage in coders/xcf.c via a crafted xcf image file.","status":"published","published":"2017-09-12T17:00:00Z","modified":"2024-08-05T19:20:41.651Z","updated_at":"2026-11-02T14:33:12.267141Z"}],"euvd":[{"id":"EUVD-2017-5846","description":"ImageMagick 7.0.6-6 has a memory leak vulnerability in ReadXCFImage in coders/xcf.c via a crafted xcf image file.","status":"published","published":"2017-09-12T17:00:00Z","modified":"2024-08-05T19:20:41Z","updated_at":"2026-11-03T02:23:17.130971Z"}],"ghsa":[{"id":"GHSA-gqrj-6wmm-3f3c","title":"ImageMagick 7.0.6-6 has a memory leak vulnerability in ReadXCFImage in coders/xcf.c via a crafted...","description":"ImageMagick 7.0.6-6 has a memory leak vulnerability in ReadXCFImage in coders/xcf.c via a crafted xcf image file.","status":"published","published":"2022-05-13T01:43:23Z","modified":"2025-04-20T03:45:49Z","cvss":[{"version":"3.0","score":6.5,"vector":"CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H","level":"medium"}],"cwes":["CWE-772"],"updated_at":"2026-11-02T15:01:52.186588Z"}],"nvd":[{"id":"CVE-2017-14343","description":"ImageMagick 7.0.6-6 has a memory leak vulnerability in ReadXCFImage in coders/xcf.c via a crafted xcf image file.","status":"published","published":"2017-09-12T17:29:00.337Z","modified":"2026-06-17T01:05:59.397Z","cvss":[{"version":"3.0","score":6.5,"vector":"CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H","level":"medium","assessor":"primary"},{"version":"2.0","score":4.3,"vector":"AV:N/AC:M/Au:N/C:N/I:N/A:P","level":"medium","assessor":"primary"}],"cwes":["CWE-772"],"updated_at":"2026-11-02T14:03:58.85945Z"}],"osv":[{"id":"CVE-2017-14343","description":"ImageMagick 7.0.6-6 has a memory leak vulnerability in ReadXCFImage in coders/xcf.c via a crafted xcf image file.","status":"published","published":"2017-09-12T17:29:00.337Z","modified":"2026-10-24T10:49:17.873055411Z","cvss":[{"version":"3.0","score":6.5,"vector":"CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H","level":"medium"}],"updated_at":"2026-11-02T15:44:04.572713Z"},{"id":"DEBIAN-CVE-2017-14343","description":"ImageMagick 7.0.6-6 has a memory leak vulnerability in ReadXCFImage in coders/xcf.c via a crafted xcf image file.","status":"published","published":"2017-09-12T17:29:00.337Z","modified":"2026-09-01T20:03:43.862560632Z","cvss":[{"version":"3.0","score":6.5,"vector":"CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H","level":"medium"}],"updated_at":"2026-11-02T15:45:28.801885Z"},{"id":"UBUNTU-CVE-2017-14343","description":"ImageMagick 7.0.6-6 has a memory leak vulnerability in ReadXCFImage in coders/xcf.c via a crafted xcf image file.","status":"published","published":"2017-09-12T00:00:00Z","modified":"2026-04-22T11:16:51.118725Z","cvss":[{"version":"3.0","score":6.5,"vector":"CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H","level":"medium"}],"updated_at":"2026-11-02T15:54:14.122973Z"},{"id":"SUSE-SU-2018:0017-1","title":"Security update for ImageMagick","description":"This update for ImageMagick fixes the following issues:\n\n- security update (xcf.c):\n  * CVE-2017-14343: Memory leak vulnerability in ReadXCFImage could lead to denial of service via a crafted file.\n    CVE-2017-12691: The ReadOneLayer function in coders/xcf.c allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service \n    (memory consumption) via a crafted file.\n    [bsc#1058422]\n\n- security update (pnm.c):\n  * CVE-2017-14042: A memory allocation failure was discovered in the ReadPNMImage function in coders/pnm.c and \n    could lead to remote denial of service [bsc#1056550]\n\n- security update (psd.c):\n  * CVE-2017-15281: ReadPSDImage allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (application crash) or \n    possibly have unspecified other impact via a crafted file [bsc#1063049]\n  * CVE-2017-13061: A length-validation vulnerability was found in the function ReadPSDLayersInternal in coders/psd.c, \n    which allows attackers to cause a denial of service (ReadPSDImage memory exhaustion) via a crafted file. [bsc#1055063]\n  * CVE-2017-12563: A Memory exhaustion vulnerability was found in the function ReadPSDImage in coders/psd.c, \n    which allows attackers to cause a denial of service. [bsc#1052460]\n  * CVE-2017-14174: Due to a lack of an EOF check (End of File) in ReadPSDLayersInternal could cause huge CPU consumption, \n    when a crafted PSD file, which claims a large 'length' field in the header but does not contain sufficient backing data, \n    is provided, the loop over \\'length\\' would consume huge CPU resources, since there is no EOF check inside the loop.[bsc#1057723]\n\n- security update (meta.c):\n  * CVE-2017-13062: Amemory leak vulnerability was found in the function formatIPTC in coders/meta.c, \n    which allows attackers to cause a denial of service (WriteMETAImage memory consumption) via a crafted file [bsc#1055053]\n\n- security update (gif.c):\n  * CVE-2017-15277: ReadGIFImage in coders/gif.c leaves the palette uninitialized when processing a GIF file that has neither \n    a global nor local palette. If the affected product is used as a library loaded into a process that operates on interesting \n    data, this data sometimes can be leaked via the uninitialized palette.[bsc#1063050]\n","status":"published","published":"2018-01-04T08:59:18Z","modified":"2026-02-04T03:59:29.908486Z","updated_at":"2026-11-02T15:53:44.594517Z"},{"id":"SUSE-SU-2018:0043-1","title":"Security update for ImageMagick","description":"This update for ImageMagick fixes several issues.\n  \nThese security issues were fixed:\n\n- CVE-2017-14343: Fixed a memory leak vulnerability in ReadXCFImage in\n  coders/xcf.c via a crafted xcf image file (bsc#1058422).\n- CVE-2017-12691: The ReadOneLayer function in coders/xcf.c allowed remote\n  attackers to cause a denial of service (memory consumption) via a crafted file\n  (bsc#1058422).\n- CVE-2017-14042: Prevent memory allocation failure in the ReadPNMImage\n  function in coders/pnm.c. The vulnerability caused a big memory allocation,\n  which may have lead to remote denial of service in the MagickRealloc function\n  in magick/memory.c (bsc#1056550).\n- CVE-2017-15281: ReadPSDImage in coders/psd.c allowed remote attackers to\n  cause a denial of service (application crash) or possibly have unspecified\n  other impact via a crafted file (bsc#1063049).\n- CVE-2017-13061: A length-validation vulnerability in the function\n  ReadPSDLayersInternal in coders/psd.c allowed attackers to cause a denial of\n  service (ReadPSDImage memory exhaustion) via a crafted file (bsc#1055063).\n- CVE-2017-12563: A memory exhaustion vulnerability in the function\n  ReadPSDImage in coders/psd.c allowed attackers to cause a denial of service\n  (bsc#1052460).\n- CVE-2017-14174: coders/psd.c allowed for DoS in ReadPSDLayersInternal() due\n  to lack of an EOF (End of File) check might have caused huge CPU consumption.\n  When a crafted PSD file, which claims a large 'length' field in the header but\n  did not contain sufficient backing data, is provided, the loop over 'length'\n  would consume huge CPU resources, since there is no EOF check inside the loop\n  (bsc#1057723).\n- CVE-2017-13062: A memory leak vulnerability in the function formatIPTC in\n  coders/meta.c allowed attackers to cause a denial of service (WriteMETAImage\n  memory consumption) via a crafted file (bsc#1055053).\n- CVE-2017-15277: ReadGIFImage in coders/gif.c left the palette uninitialized\n  when processing a GIF file that has neither a global nor local palette. If this\n  functionality was used as a library loaded into a process that operates on\n  interesting data, this data sometimes could have been leaked via the\n  uninitialized palette (bsc#1063050).\n","status":"published","published":"2018-01-09T06:59:50Z","modified":"2026-02-04T02:34:22.003224Z","updated_at":"2026-11-02T15:53:44.594517Z"},{"id":"SUSE-SU-2018:0197-1","title":"Security update for GraphicsMagick","description":"This update for GraphicsMagick fixes several issues.\n\nThese security issues were fixed:\n\n- CVE-2017-14343: Fixed a memory leak vulnerability in ReadXCFImage in\n  coders/xcf.c via a crafted xcf image file (bsc#1058422)\n- CVE-2017-12691: The ReadOneLayer function in coders/xcf.c allowed remote\n  attackers to cause a denial of service (memory consumption) via a\n  crafted file (bsc#1058422)\n- CVE-2017-14042: Prevent memory allocation failure in the ReadPNMImage\n  function in coders/pnm.c. The vulnerability caused a big memory\n  allocation, which may have lead to remote denial of service in the\n  MagickRealloc function in magick/memory.c (bsc#1056550)\n- CVE-2017-13061: A length-validation vulnerability in the function\n  ReadPSDLayersInternal in coders/psd.c allowed attackers to cause a\n  denial of service (ReadPSDImage memory exhaustion) via a crafted file\n  (bsc#1055063)\n- CVE-2017-12563: A memory exhaustion vulnerability in the function\n  ReadPSDImage in coders/psd.c allowed attackers to cause a denial of service\n  (bsc#1052460)\n- CVE-2017-14174: coders/psd.c allowed for DoS in ReadPSDLayersInternal() due\n  to lack of an EOF (End of File) check might have caused huge CPU\n  consumption. When a crafted PSD file, which claims a large 'length'\n  field in the header but did not contain sufficient backing data, is\n  provided, the loop over 'length' would consume huge CPU resources,\n  since there is no EOF check inside the loop (bsc#1057723)\n- CVE-2017-15277: ReadGIFImage in coders/gif.c left the palette uninitialized\n  when processing a GIF file that has neither a global nor local palette. If this\n  functionality was used as a library loaded into a process that operates on\n  interesting data, this data sometimes could have been leaked via the\n  uninitialized palette (bsc#1063050)\n- CVE-2017-14733: ReadRLEImage in coders/rle.c mishandled RLE headers that\n  specified too few colors, which allowed remote attackers to cause a denial of\n  service (heap-based buffer over-read and application crash) via a crafted file\n  (bsc#1060577).\n- CVE-2017-12662: Fixed a memory leak vulnerability in WritePDFImage in\n  coders/pdf.c (bsc#1052758).\n- CVE-2017-14994: ReadDCMImage in coders/dcm.c allowed remote attackers to\n  cause a denial of service (NULL pointer dereference) via a crafted DICOM image,\n  related to the ability of DCM_ReadNonNativeImages to yield an image list\n  with zero frames (bsc#1061587).\n- CVE-2017-12140: The ReadDCMImage function in coders\\dcm.c had an integer\n  signedness error leading to excessive memory consumption via a crafted DCM file\n  (bsc#1051847).\n- CVE-2017-12644: Fixed memory leak vulnerability in ReadDCMImage in\n  coders\\dcm.c (bsc#1052764).\n- CVE-2017-11188: The ReadDPXImage function in coders\\dpx.c had a large loop\n  vulnerability that can cause CPU exhaustion via a crafted DPX file, related to\n  lack of an EOF check (bsc#1048457).\n- CVE-2017-10799: When processing a DPX image (with metadata indicating a large\n  width) in coders/dpx.c, a denial of service (OOM) could have occurred in\n  ReadDPXImage() (bsc#1047054).\n- CVE-2017-11449: coders/mpc did not enable seekable streams and thus could not\n  validate blob sizes, which allowed remote attackers to cause a denial of\n  service (application crash) or possibly have unspecified other impact via an\n  image received from stdin (bsc#1049373).\n- CVE-2017-11532: Prevent a memory leak vulnerability in the WriteMPCImage()\n  function in coders/mpc.c via a crafted file allowing for DoS (bsc#1050129).\n- CVE-2017-12430: A memory exhaustion in the function ReadMPCImage in\n  coders/mpc.c allowed attackers to cause DoS (bsc#1052252).\n- CVE-2017-12642: Prevent a memory leak vulnerability in ReadMPCImage in\n  coders\\mpc.c via crafted file allowing for DoS (bsc#1052771).\n- CVE-2017-14249: A mishandled EOF check in ReadMPCImage in coders/mpc.c that\n  lead to a division by zero in GetPixelCacheTileSize in MagickCore/cache.c\n  allowed remote attackers to cause a denial of service via a crafted file\n  (bsc#1058082).\n- CVE-2017-16547: The DrawImage function in magick/render.c did not properly\n  look for pop keywords that are associated with push keywords, which allowed\n  remote attackers to cause a denial of service (negative strncpy and application\n  crash) or possibly have unspecified other impact via a crafted file\n  (bsc#1067177).\n- Prevent memory leak via crafted file in pwp.c allowing for DoS (bsc#1051412)\n- CVE-2017-10800: Processing MATLAB images in coders/mat.c could have lead to a\n  denial of service (OOM) in ReadMATImage() if the size specified for a MAT\n  Object was larger than the actual amount of data (bsc#1047044).\n- CVE-2017-18022: Fixed memory leak vulnerability in MontageImageCommand in\n  MagickWand/montage.c (bsc#1074975).\n- CVE-2018-5247: Fixed memory leak vulnerability in ReadRLAImage in\n  coders/rla.c (bsc#1074969).\n","status":"published","published":"2018-01-24T14:43:19Z","modified":"2026-02-04T04:20:41.306335Z","updated_at":"2026-11-02T15:53:44.594517Z"},{"id":"SUSE-SU-2018:0864-1","title":"Security update for GraphicsMagick","description":"This update for GraphicsMagick fixes several issues.\n\nThese security issues were fixed:\n\n- CVE-2017-11524: The WriteBlob function allowed remote attackers to cause a\n  denial of service (assertion failure and application exit) via a crafted file\n  (bsc#1050087)\n- CVE-2017-16353: Prevent memory information disclosure in the DescribeImage\n  function caused by a heap-based buffer over-read. The portion of the code\n  containing the vulnerability is responsible for printing the IPTC Profile\n  information contained in the image. This vulnerability can be triggered with a\n  specially crafted MIFF file. There is an out-of-bounds buffer dereference\n  because certain increments were never checked (bsc#1066170)\n- CVE-2017-16352: Prevent a heap-based buffer overflow in the 'Display visual\n  image directory' feature of the DescribeImage() function. One possible way to\n  trigger the vulnerability is to run the identify command on a specially crafted\n  MIFF format file with the verbose flag (bsc#1066168)\n- CVE-2017-14314: Prevent off-by-one error in the DrawImage function that\n  allowed remote attackers to cause a denial of service (DrawDashPolygon\n  heap-based buffer over-read and application crash) via a crafted file\n  (bsc#1058630)\n- CVE-2017-14505: Fixed handling of NULL arrays, which allowed attackers to\n  perform Denial of Service (NULL pointer dereference and application crash in\n  AcquireQuantumMemory within MagickCore/memory.c) by providing a crafted Image\n  File as input (bsc#1059735)\n- CVE-2017-15016: Prevent NULL pointer dereference vulnerability in\n  ReadEnhMetaFile allowing for denial of service (bsc#1082291)\n- CVE-2017-15017: Prevent NULL pointer dereference vulnerability in\n  ReadOneMNGImage allowing for denial of service (bsc#1082283)\n- CVE-2017-12693: The ReadBMPImage function allowed remote attackers to cause a\n  denial of service (memory consumption) via a crafted BMP file (bsc#1082348)\n- CVE-2017-18219: Prevent allocation failure in the function ReadOnePNGImage,\n  which allowed attackers to cause a denial of service via a crafted file that\n  triggers an attempt at a large png_pixels array allocation (bsc#1084060)\n- CVE-2017-18230: Prevent NULL pointer dereference in the function\n  ReadCINEONImage, which allowed attackers to cause a denial of service via a\n  crafted file (bsc#1085233).\n- CVE-2017-18220: The ReadOneJNGImage and ReadJNGImage functions allowed remote\n  attackers to cause a denial of service (magick/blob.c CloseBlob use-after-free)\n  or possibly have unspecified other impact via a crafted file (bsc#1084062).\n  ","status":"published","published":"2018-04-03T15:17:14Z","modified":"2026-02-04T03:36:06.932491Z","updated_at":"2026-11-02T15:53:44.594517Z"},{"id":"SUSE-SU-2018:0880-1","title":"Security update for ImageMagick","description":"This update for ImageMagick fixes several issues.\n\nThese security issues were fixed:\n\n- CVE-2018-8804: The WriteEPTImage function allowed remote attackers to cause a\n  denial of service (double free and application crash) or possibly have\n  unspecified other impact via a crafted file (bsc#1086011)\n- CVE-2017-11524: The WriteBlob function allowed remote attackers to cause a\n  denial of service (assertion failure and application exit) via a crafted file\n  (bsc#1050087)\n- CVE-2017-18219: Prevent allocation failure in the function ReadOnePNGImage,\n  which allowed attackers to cause a denial of service via a crafted file that\n  triggers an attempt at a large png_pixels array allocation (bsc#1084060).\n- CVE-2017-9500: Prevent assertion failure in the function\n  ResetImageProfileIterator, which allowed attackers to cause a denial of service\n  via a crafted file (bsc#1043290)\n- CVE-2017-16353: Prevent memory information disclosure in the DescribeImage\n  function caused by a heap-based buffer over-read. The portion of the code\n  containing the vulnerability is responsible for printing the IPTC Profile\n  information contained in the image. This vulnerability can be triggered with a\n  specially crafted MIFF file. There is an out-of-bounds buffer dereference\n  because certain increments were never checked (bsc#1066170)\n- CVE-2017-16352: Prevent a heap-based buffer overflow in the 'Display visual\n  image directory' feature of the DescribeImage() function. One possible way to\n  trigger the vulnerability is to run the identify command on a specially crafted\n  MIFF format file with the verbose flag (bsc#1066168)\n- CVE-2017-14314: Prevent off-by-one error in the DrawImage function that\n  allowed remote attackers to cause a denial of service (DrawDashPolygon\n  heap-based buffer over-read and application crash) via a crafted file\n  (bsc#1058630)\n- CVE-2017-13768: Prevent NULL pointer dereference in the IdentifyImage\n  function that allowed an attacker to perform denial of service by sending a\n  crafted image file (bsc#1056434)\n- CVE-2017-14505: Fixed handling of NULL arrays, which allowed attackers to\n  perform Denial of Service (NULL pointer dereference and application crash in\n  AcquireQuantumMemory within MagickCore/memory.c) by providing a crafted Image\n  File as input (bsc#1059735)\n- CVE-2018-7443: The ReadTIFFImage function did not properly validate the\n  amount of image data in a file, which allowed remote attackers to cause a\n  denial of service (memory allocation failure in the AcquireMagickMemory\n  function in MagickCore/memory.c) (bsc#1082792)\n- CVE-2017-15016: Prevent NULL pointer dereference vulnerability in\n  ReadEnhMetaFile allowing for denial of service (bsc#1082291)\n- CVE-2017-15017: Prevent NULL pointer dereference vulnerability in\n  ReadOneMNGImage allowing for denial of service (bsc#1082283)\n- CVE-2017-12692: The ReadVIFFImage function allowed remote attackers to cause\n  a denial of service (memory consumption) via a crafted VIFF file (bsc#1082362)\n- CVE-2017-12693: The ReadBMPImage function allowed remote attackers to cause a\n  denial of service (memory consumption) via a crafted BMP file (bsc#1082348)\n  ","status":"published","published":"2018-04-05T15:23:37Z","modified":"2026-02-04T04:07:45.421958Z","updated_at":"2026-11-02T15:53:44.594517Z"},{"id":"USN-3681-1","title":"imagemagick vulnerabilities","description":"It was discovered that ImageMagick incorrectly handled certain malformed\nimage files. If a user or automated system using ImageMagick were tricked\ninto opening a specially crafted image, an attacker could exploit this to\ncause a denial of service or possibly execute code with the privileges of\nthe user invoking the program.\n","status":"published","published":"2018-06-12T11:40:14Z","modified":"2026-04-22T09:46:51.738947Z","updated_at":"2026-11-02T16:58:13.496563Z"}]}}