{"id":"CVE-2017-2623","aliases":["EUVD-2017-11784","GHSA-v473-h83f-x76x","RHSA-2017:0444"],"status":"published","title":"It was discovered that rpm-ostree and rpm-ostree-client before 2017.3 fail to properly check GPG...","description":"It was discovered that rpm-ostree and rpm-ostree-client before 2017.3 fail to properly check GPG signatures on packages when doing layering. Packages with unsigned or badly signed content could fail to be rejected as expected. This issue is partially mitigated on RHEL Atomic Host, where certificate pinning is used by default.","severity":{"version":"3.0","score":5.3,"vector":"CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N","level":"medium","assessor":"cna","from":"cve"},"epss":{"day":"2026-11-07","score":0.01013,"percentile":0.63438,"model":"v2026.06.15"},"facts":{"in_kev":false,"known_exploited":false,"public_exploit":false,"fix_available":true},"cwes":["CWE-295"],"published":"2018-07-27T18:00:00Z","modified":"2026-07-01T10:01:55Z","fixes":[{"ecosystem":"Red Hat:rhel_atomic:7","package":"rpm-ostree","fixed_in":["0:2017.1-5.atomic.el7"],"sources":["osv"]},{"ecosystem":"Red Hat:rhel_atomic:7","package":"rpm-ostree-client","fixed_in":["0:2017.1-6.atomic.el7"],"sources":["osv"]},{"ecosystem":"Red Hat:rhel_atomic:7","package":"rpm-ostree-client-debuginfo","fixed_in":["0:2017.1-6.atomic.el7"],"sources":["osv"]},{"ecosystem":"Red Hat:rhel_atomic:7","package":"rpm-ostree-debuginfo","fixed_in":["0:2017.1-5.atomic.el7"],"sources":["osv"]}],"affected":[{"source":"osv","ecosystem":"Red Hat:rhel_atomic:7","package":"rpm-ostree","ranges":[{"type":"ECOSYSTEM","events":[{"introduced":"0"},{"fixed":"0:2017.1-5.atomic.el7"}]}]},{"source":"osv","ecosystem":"Red Hat:rhel_atomic:7","package":"rpm-ostree-client","ranges":[{"type":"ECOSYSTEM","events":[{"introduced":"0"},{"fixed":"0:2017.1-6.atomic.el7"}]}]},{"source":"osv","ecosystem":"Red Hat:rhel_atomic:7","package":"rpm-ostree-client-debuginfo","ranges":[{"type":"ECOSYSTEM","events":[{"introduced":"0"},{"fixed":"0:2017.1-6.atomic.el7"}]}]},{"source":"osv","ecosystem":"Red Hat:rhel_atomic:7","package":"rpm-ostree-debuginfo","ranges":[{"type":"ECOSYSTEM","events":[{"introduced":"0"},{"fixed":"0:2017.1-5.atomic.el7"}]}]}],"products":[{"vendor":"project atomic","product":"rpm-ostree,"},{"vendor":"redhat","product":"enterprise_linux"},{"vendor":"rpm-ostree","product":"rpm-ostree"},{"vendor":"rpm-ostree","product":"rpm-ostree-client"}],"references":[{"url":"https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=CVE-2017-2623","tags":["x_refsource_CONFIRM","x_transferred","Issue Tracking","Third Party Advisory"]},{"url":"https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2017:0444","tags":["vendor-advisory","x_refsource_REDHAT","x_transferred","Third Party Advisory","advisory"]},{"url":"http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/96558","tags":["vdb-entry","x_refsource_BID","x_transferred","Third Party Advisory","VDB Entry"]},{"url":"https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2017-2623","tags":["advisory"]},{"url":"https://github.com/advisories/GHSA-v473-h83f-x76x"},{"url":"https://access.redhat.com/security/updates/classification/#moderate","tags":["article"]},{"url":"https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1416089","tags":["report"]},{"url":"https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1421781","tags":["report"]},{"url":"https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1421867","tags":["report"]},{"url":"https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1422157","tags":["report"]},{"url":"https://security.access.redhat.com/data/csaf/v2/advisories/2017/rhsa-2017_0444.json","tags":["advisory"]},{"url":"https://access.redhat.com/security/cve/CVE-2017-2623","tags":["report"]},{"url":"https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2017-2623","tags":["advisory"]}],"sources":{"cve":[{"id":"CVE-2017-2623","description":"It was discovered that rpm-ostree and rpm-ostree-client before 2017.3 fail to properly check GPG signatures on packages when doing layering. Packages with unsigned or badly signed content could fail to be rejected as expected. This issue is partially mitigated on RHEL Atomic Host, where certificate pinning is used by default.","status":"published","published":"2018-07-27T18:00:00Z","modified":"2024-08-05T14:02:07.178Z","cvss":[{"version":"3.0","score":5.3,"vector":"CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N","level":"medium","assessor":"cna"}],"cwes":["CWE-295"],"updated_at":"2026-11-02T14:33:15.887816Z"}],"euvd":[{"id":"EUVD-2017-11784","description":"It was discovered that rpm-ostree and rpm-ostree-client before 2017.3 fail to properly check GPG signatures on packages when doing layering. Packages with unsigned or badly signed content could fail to be rejected as expected. This issue is partially mitigated on RHEL Atomic Host, where certificate pinning is used by default.","status":"published","published":"2018-07-27T18:00:00Z","modified":"2024-08-05T14:02:07Z","cvss":[{"version":"3.0","score":5.3,"vector":"CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N","level":"medium"}],"updated_at":"2026-11-03T02:39:20.035866Z"}],"ghsa":[{"id":"GHSA-v473-h83f-x76x","title":"It was discovered that rpm-ostree and rpm-ostree-client before 2017.3 fail to properly check GPG...","description":"It was discovered that rpm-ostree and rpm-ostree-client before 2017.3 fail to properly check GPG signatures on packages when doing layering. Packages with unsigned or badly signed content could fail to be rejected as expected. This issue is partially mitigated on RHEL Atomic Host, where certificate pinning is used by default.","status":"published","published":"2022-05-13T01:36:52Z","modified":"2023-02-01T05:09:02Z","cvss":[{"version":"3.0","score":5.3,"vector":"CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N","level":"medium"}],"cwes":["CWE-295"],"updated_at":"2026-11-02T14:50:54.417127Z"}],"nvd":[{"id":"CVE-2017-2623","description":"It was discovered that rpm-ostree and rpm-ostree-client before 2017.3 fail to properly check GPG signatures on packages when doing layering. Packages with unsigned or badly signed content could fail to be rejected as expected. This issue is partially mitigated on RHEL Atomic Host, where certificate pinning is used by default.","status":"published","published":"2018-07-27T18:29:00.767Z","modified":"2026-06-17T01:16:31.983Z","cvss":[{"version":"3.0","score":5.3,"vector":"CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N","level":"medium","assessor":"secondary"},{"version":"3.0","score":5.3,"vector":"CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N","level":"medium","assessor":"primary"},{"version":"2.0","score":4.3,"vector":"AV:N/AC:M/Au:N/C:N/I:P/A:N","level":"medium","assessor":"primary"}],"cwes":["CWE-295"],"updated_at":"2026-11-02T14:04:18.679411Z"}],"osv":[{"id":"RHSA-2017:0444","title":"Red Hat Security Advisory: rpm-ostree and rpm-ostree-client security, bug fix, and enhancement update","status":"published","published":"2024-09-16T00:03:59Z","modified":"2026-07-01T10:01:55Z","cvss":[{"version":"3.0","score":5.3,"vector":"CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N","level":"medium"}],"updated_at":"2026-11-02T15:53:04.262457Z"}]}}