{"id":"CVE-2017-5999","aliases":["EUVD-2017-15067","GHSA-v4m6-phwc-pmmj"],"status":"published","title":"An issue was discovered in sysPass 2.x before 2.1, in which an algorithm was never sufficiently...","description":"An issue was discovered in sysPass 2.x before 2.1, in which an algorithm was never sufficiently reviewed by cryptographers. The fact that inc/SP/Core/Crypt.class is using the MCRYPT_RIJNDAEL_256() function (the 256-bit block version of Rijndael, not AES) instead of MCRYPT_RIJNDAEL_128 (real AES) could help an attacker to create unknown havoc in the remote system.","severity":{"version":"3.0","score":7.5,"vector":"CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N","level":"high","assessor":"primary","from":"nvd"},"epss":{"day":"2026-11-08","score":0.01137,"percentile":0.66756,"model":"v2026.06.15"},"facts":{"in_kev":false,"known_exploited":false,"public_exploit":false,"fix_available":false},"cwes":["CWE-326"],"published":"2017-03-06T06:11:00Z","modified":"2026-10-20T10:48:14Z","products":[{"vendor":"syspass","product":"syspass"}],"references":[{"url":"https://cxsecurity.com/issue/WLB-2017020196","tags":["x_refsource_MISC","x_transferred","Third Party Advisory","advisory"]},{"url":"https://github.com/nuxsmin/sysPass/commit/a0e2c485e53b370a7cc6d833e192c3c5bfd70e1f","tags":["x_refsource_CONFIRM","x_transferred","Patch","fix"]},{"url":"http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/96562","tags":["vdb-entry","x_refsource_BID","x_transferred","Third Party Advisory","VDB Entry","advisory"]},{"url":"https://github.com/nuxsmin/sysPass/releases/tag/2.1.0.17022601","tags":["x_refsource_CONFIRM","x_transferred","Patch","Release Notes","fix"]},{"url":"https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2017-5999"},{"url":"https://github.com/advisories/GHSA-v4m6-phwc-pmmj"}],"sources":{"cve":[{"id":"CVE-2017-5999","description":"An issue was discovered in sysPass 2.x before 2.1, in which an algorithm was never sufficiently reviewed by cryptographers. The fact that inc/SP/Core/Crypt.class is using the MCRYPT_RIJNDAEL_256() function (the 256-bit block version of Rijndael, not AES) instead of MCRYPT_RIJNDAEL_128 (real AES) could help an attacker to create unknown havoc in the remote system.","status":"published","published":"2017-03-06T06:11:00Z","modified":"2024-08-05T15:18:49.391Z","updated_at":"2026-11-02T14:33:12.599234Z"}],"euvd":[{"id":"EUVD-2017-15067","description":"An issue was discovered in sysPass 2.x before 2.1, in which an algorithm was never sufficiently reviewed by cryptographers. The fact that inc/SP/Core/Crypt.class is using the MCRYPT_RIJNDAEL_256() function (the 256-bit block version of Rijndael, not AES) instead of MCRYPT_RIJNDAEL_128 (real AES) could help an attacker to create unknown havoc in the remote system.","status":"published","published":"2017-03-06T06:11:00Z","modified":"2024-08-05T15:18:49Z","updated_at":"2026-11-03T02:39:13.436112Z"}],"ghsa":[{"id":"GHSA-v4m6-phwc-pmmj","title":"An issue was discovered in sysPass 2.x before 2.1, in which an algorithm was never sufficiently...","description":"An issue was discovered in sysPass 2.x before 2.1, in which an algorithm was never sufficiently reviewed by cryptographers. The fact that inc/SP/Core/Crypt.class is using the MCRYPT_RIJNDAEL_256() function (the 256-bit block version of Rijndael, not AES) instead of MCRYPT_RIJNDAEL_128 (real AES) could help an attacker to create unknown havoc in the remote system.","status":"published","published":"2022-05-17T02:55:24Z","modified":"2023-01-27T05:06:13Z","cvss":[{"version":"3.0","score":7.5,"vector":"CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N","level":"high"}],"cwes":["CWE-326"],"updated_at":"2026-11-02T14:42:51.492706Z"}],"nvd":[{"id":"CVE-2017-5999","description":"An issue was discovered in sysPass 2.x before 2.1, in which an algorithm was never sufficiently reviewed by cryptographers. The fact that inc/SP/Core/Crypt.class is using the MCRYPT_RIJNDAEL_256() function (the 256-bit block version of Rijndael, not AES) instead of MCRYPT_RIJNDAEL_128 (real AES) could help an attacker to create unknown havoc in the remote system.","status":"published","published":"2017-03-06T06:59:00.287Z","modified":"2026-06-17T01:21:35.9Z","cvss":[{"version":"3.0","score":7.5,"vector":"CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N","level":"high","assessor":"primary"},{"version":"2.0","score":5,"vector":"AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:P/I:N/A:N","level":"medium","assessor":"primary"}],"cwes":["CWE-326"],"updated_at":"2026-11-02T14:03:43.325192Z"}],"osv":[{"id":"CVE-2017-5999","description":"An issue was discovered in sysPass 2.x before 2.1, in which an algorithm was never sufficiently reviewed by cryptographers. The fact that inc/SP/Core/Crypt.class is using the MCRYPT_RIJNDAEL_256() function (the 256-bit block version of Rijndael, not AES) instead of MCRYPT_RIJNDAEL_128 (real AES) could help an attacker to create unknown havoc in the remote system.","status":"published","published":"2017-03-06T06:59:00.287Z","modified":"2026-10-20T10:48:14.959694197Z","cvss":[{"version":"3.0","score":7.5,"vector":"CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N","level":"high"}],"updated_at":"2026-11-02T15:44:06.029968Z"}]}}