{"id":"CVE-2017-6507","aliases":["DEBIAN-CVE-2017-6507","EUVD-2017-15563","GHSA-44p8-9hqx-3rqg","SUSE-SU-2017:1151-1","SUSE-SU-2017:2699-1","SUSE-SU-2017:2700-1","UBUNTU-CVE-2017-6507","USN-3247-1","openSUSE-SU-2024:10627-1"],"status":"published","title":"An issue was discovered in AppArmor before 2.12. Incorrect handling of unknown AppArmor profiles...","description":"An issue was discovered in AppArmor before 2.12. Incorrect handling of unknown AppArmor profiles in AppArmor init scripts, upstart jobs, and/or systemd unit files allows an attacker to possibly have increased attack surfaces of processes that were intended to be confined by AppArmor. This is due to the common logic to handle 'restart' operations removing AppArmor profiles that aren't found in the typical filesystem locations, such as /etc/apparmor.d/. Userspace projects that manage their own AppArmor profiles in atypical directories, such as what's done by LXD and Docker, are affected by this flaw in the AppArmor init script logic.","severity":{"version":"3.0","score":5.9,"vector":"CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N","level":"medium","assessor":"primary","from":"nvd"},"epss":{"day":"2026-11-08","score":0.01589,"percentile":0.7581,"model":"v2026.06.15"},"facts":{"in_kev":false,"known_exploited":false,"public_exploit":false,"fix_available":true},"cwes":["CWE-269"],"published":"2017-03-24T00:00:00Z","modified":"2026-09-01T20:03:49Z","fixes":[{"ecosystem":"Debian:12","package":"apparmor","fixed_in":["2.11.0-3"],"sources":["osv"]},{"ecosystem":"Debian:13","package":"apparmor","fixed_in":["2.11.0-3"],"sources":["osv"]},{"ecosystem":"Debian:14","package":"apparmor","fixed_in":["2.11.0-3"],"sources":["osv"]},{"ecosystem":"SUSE:Linux Enterprise Desktop 12 SP1","package":"apparmor","fixed_in":["2.8.2-54.1"],"sources":["osv"]},{"ecosystem":"SUSE:Linux Enterprise Desktop 12 SP2","package":"apparmor","fixed_in":["2.8.2-54.1"],"sources":["osv"]},{"ecosystem":"SUSE:Linux Enterprise Server for Raspberry Pi 12 SP2","package":"apparmor","fixed_in":["2.8.2-54.1"],"sources":["osv"]},{"ecosystem":"SUSE:Linux Enterprise Software Development Kit 12 SP1","package":"apparmor","fixed_in":["2.8.2-54.1"],"sources":["osv"]},{"ecosystem":"SUSE:Linux Enterprise Software Development Kit 12 SP2","package":"apparmor","fixed_in":["2.8.2-54.1"],"sources":["osv"]},{"ecosystem":"SUSE:Linux Enterprise Server 12 SP1","package":"apparmor","fixed_in":["2.8.2-54.1"],"sources":["osv"]},{"ecosystem":"SUSE:Linux Enterprise Server for SAP Applications 12 SP1","package":"apparmor","fixed_in":["2.8.2-54.1"],"sources":["osv"]},{"ecosystem":"SUSE:Linux Enterprise Server 12 SP2","package":"apparmor","fixed_in":["2.8.2-54.1"],"sources":["osv"]},{"ecosystem":"SUSE:Linux Enterprise Server for SAP Applications 12 SP2","package":"apparmor","fixed_in":["2.8.2-54.1"],"sources":["osv"]},{"ecosystem":"Ubuntu:14.04:LTS","package":"apparmor","fixed_in":["2.10.95-0ubuntu2.6~14.04.1"],"sources":["osv"]},{"ecosystem":"Ubuntu:16.04:LTS","package":"apparmor","fixed_in":["2.10.95-0ubuntu2.6"],"sources":["osv"]}],"affected":[{"source":"osv","ecosystem":"Debian:12","package":"apparmor","ranges":[{"type":"ECOSYSTEM","events":[{"introduced":"0"},{"fixed":"2.11.0-3"}]}]},{"source":"osv","ecosystem":"Debian:13","package":"apparmor","ranges":[{"type":"ECOSYSTEM","events":[{"introduced":"0"},{"fixed":"2.11.0-3"}]}]},{"source":"osv","ecosystem":"Debian:14","package":"apparmor","ranges":[{"type":"ECOSYSTEM","events":[{"introduced":"0"},{"fixed":"2.11.0-3"}]}]},{"source":"osv","ecosystem":"SUSE:Linux Enterprise Desktop 12 SP1","package":"apparmor","ranges":[{"type":"ECOSYSTEM","events":[{"introduced":"0"},{"fixed":"2.8.2-54.1"}]}]},{"source":"osv","ecosystem":"SUSE:Linux Enterprise Desktop 12 SP2","package":"apparmor","ranges":[{"type":"ECOSYSTEM","events":[{"introduced":"0"},{"fixed":"2.8.2-54.1"}]}]},{"source":"osv","ecosystem":"SUSE:Linux Enterprise Server for Raspberry Pi 12 SP2","package":"apparmor","ranges":[{"type":"ECOSYSTEM","events":[{"introduced":"0"},{"fixed":"2.8.2-54.1"}]}]},{"source":"osv","ecosystem":"SUSE:Linux Enterprise Software Development Kit 12 SP1","package":"apparmor","ranges":[{"type":"ECOSYSTEM","events":[{"introduced":"0"},{"fixed":"2.8.2-54.1"}]}]},{"source":"osv","ecosystem":"SUSE:Linux Enterprise Software Development Kit 12 SP2","package":"apparmor","ranges":[{"type":"ECOSYSTEM","events":[{"introduced":"0"},{"fixed":"2.8.2-54.1"}]}]},{"source":"osv","ecosystem":"SUSE:Linux Enterprise Server 12 SP1","package":"apparmor","ranges":[{"type":"ECOSYSTEM","events":[{"introduced":"0"},{"fixed":"2.8.2-54.1"}]}]},{"source":"osv","ecosystem":"SUSE:Linux Enterprise Server for SAP Applications 12 SP1","package":"apparmor","ranges":[{"type":"ECOSYSTEM","events":[{"introduced":"0"},{"fixed":"2.8.2-54.1"}]}]},{"source":"osv","ecosystem":"SUSE:Linux Enterprise Server 12 SP2","package":"apparmor","ranges":[{"type":"ECOSYSTEM","events":[{"introduced":"0"},{"fixed":"2.8.2-54.1"}]}]},{"source":"osv","ecosystem":"SUSE:Linux Enterprise Server for SAP Applications 12 SP2","package":"apparmor","ranges":[{"type":"ECOSYSTEM","events":[{"introduced":"0"},{"fixed":"2.8.2-54.1"}]}]},{"source":"osv","ecosystem":"Ubuntu:14.04:LTS","package":"apparmor","ranges":[{"type":"ECOSYSTEM","events":[{"introduced":"0"},{"fixed":"2.10.95-0ubuntu2.6~14.04.1"}]}],"versions":["2.8.0-0ubuntu31","2.8.0-0ubuntu32","2.8.0-0ubuntu33","2.8.0-0ubuntu34","2.8.0-0ubuntu35","2.8.0-0ubuntu37","2.8.0-0ubuntu38","2.8.95~2430-0ubuntu1","2.8.95~2430-0ubuntu2","2.8.95~2430-0ubuntu3","2.8.95~2430-0ubuntu5","2.8.95~2430-0ubuntu5.1","2.8.95~2430-0ubuntu5.2","2.8.95~2430-0ubuntu5.3","2.10.95-0ubuntu2.5~14.04.1"]},{"source":"osv","ecosystem":"Ubuntu:16.04:LTS","package":"apparmor","ranges":[{"type":"ECOSYSTEM","events":[{"introduced":"0"},{"fixed":"2.10.95-0ubuntu2.6"}]}],"versions":["2.10-0ubuntu6","2.10-0ubuntu7","2.10-0ubuntu8","2.10-0ubuntu10","2.10-0ubuntu11","2.10-0ubuntu12","2.10-3ubuntu1","2.10-3ubuntu2","2.10.95-0ubuntu1","2.10.95-0ubuntu2","2.10.95-0ubuntu2.2","2.10.95-0ubuntu2.5"]},{"source":"osv","ecosystem":"Ubuntu:14.04:LTS","package":"apparmor","ranges":[{"type":"ECOSYSTEM","events":[{"introduced":"0"},{"fixed":"2.10.95-0ubuntu2.6~14.04.1"}]}],"versions":["2.8.0-0ubuntu31","2.8.0-0ubuntu32","2.8.0-0ubuntu33","2.8.0-0ubuntu34","2.8.0-0ubuntu35","2.8.0-0ubuntu37","2.8.0-0ubuntu38","2.8.95~2430-0ubuntu1","2.8.95~2430-0ubuntu2","2.8.95~2430-0ubuntu3","2.8.95~2430-0ubuntu5","2.8.95~2430-0ubuntu5.1","2.8.95~2430-0ubuntu5.2","2.8.95~2430-0ubuntu5.3","2.10.95-0ubuntu2.5~14.04.1"]},{"source":"osv","ecosystem":"Ubuntu:16.04:LTS","package":"apparmor","ranges":[{"type":"ECOSYSTEM","events":[{"introduced":"0"},{"fixed":"2.10.95-0ubuntu2.6"}]}],"versions":["2.10-0ubuntu6","2.10-0ubuntu7","2.10-0ubuntu8","2.10-0ubuntu10","2.10-0ubuntu11","2.10-0ubuntu12","2.10-3ubuntu1","2.10-3ubuntu2","2.10.95-0ubuntu1","2.10.95-0ubuntu2","2.10.95-0ubuntu2.2","2.10.95-0ubuntu2.5"]}],"products":[{"vendor":"apparmor","product":"apparmor"},{"vendor":"canonical","product":"ubuntu_core"},{"vendor":"canonical","product":"ubuntu_touch"}],"references":[{"url":"http://bazaar.launchpad.net/~apparmor-dev/apparmor/master/revision/3648","tags":["x_refsource_CONFIRM","x_transferred","Issue Tracking","Patch","Third Party Advisory","fix"]},{"url":"http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/97223","tags":["vdb-entry","x_refsource_BID","x_transferred","web"]},{"url":"https://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-security/cve/2017/CVE-2017-6507.html","tags":["x_refsource_CONFIRM","x_transferred","Third Party Advisory","advisory"]},{"url":"https://bugs.launchpad.net/apparmor/+bug/1668892","tags":["x_refsource_CONFIRM","x_transferred","Issue Tracking","Patch","Third Party Advisory","fix"]},{"url":"http://bazaar.launchpad.net/~apparmor-dev/apparmor/master/revision/3647","tags":["x_refsource_CONFIRM","x_transferred","Issue Tracking","Patch","Third Party Advisory","fix"]},{"url":"https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2017-6507"},{"url":"https://github.com/advisories/GHSA-44p8-9hqx-3rqg"},{"url":"https://security-tracker.debian.org/tracker/CVE-2017-6507","tags":["advisory"]},{"url":"https://www.suse.com/support/update/announcement/2017/suse-su-20171151-1/","tags":["advisory"]},{"url":"https://bugzilla.suse.com/1000201","tags":["report"]},{"url":"https://bugzilla.suse.com/1016259","tags":["report"]},{"url":"https://bugzilla.suse.com/1022610","tags":["report"]},{"url":"https://bugzilla.suse.com/1029696","tags":["report"]},{"url":"https://bugzilla.suse.com/1031529","tags":["report"]},{"url":"https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2017-6507","tags":["web"]},{"url":"https://www.suse.com/support/update/announcement/2017/suse-su-20172699-1/","tags":["advisory"]},{"url":"https://bugzilla.suse.com/1056193","tags":["report"]},{"url":"https://bugzilla.suse.com/975726","tags":["report"]},{"url":"https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2012-6702","tags":["web"]},{"url":"https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2014-0191","tags":["web"]},{"url":"https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2014-6271","tags":["web"]},{"url":"https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2014-6277","tags":["web"]},{"url":"https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2014-6278","tags":["web"]},{"url":"https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2014-7169","tags":["web"]},{"url":"https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2014-7187","tags":["web"]},{"url":"https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2014-7824","tags":["web"]},{"url":"https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2014-8964","tags":["web"]},{"url":"https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2014-9770","tags":["web"]},{"url":"https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2015-0245","tags":["web"]},{"url":"https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2015-1283","tags":["web"]},{"url":"https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2015-2059","tags":["web"]},{"url":"https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2015-2325","tags":["web"]},{"url":"https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2015-2327","tags":["web"]},{"url":"https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2015-2328","tags":["web"]},{"url":"https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2015-3210","tags":["web"]},{"url":"https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2015-3217","tags":["web"]},{"url":"https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2015-3238","tags":["web"]},{"url":"https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2015-3622","tags":["web"]},{"url":"https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2015-5073","tags":["web"]},{"url":"https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2015-5218","tags":["web"]},{"url":"https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2015-5276","tags":["web"]},{"url":"https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2015-7511","tags":["web"]},{"url":"https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2015-8380","tags":["web"]},{"url":"https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2015-8381","tags":["web"]},{"url":"https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2015-8382","tags":["web"]},{"url":"https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2015-8383","tags":["web"]},{"url":"https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2015-8384","tags":["web"]},{"url":"https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2015-8385","tags":["web"]},{"url":"https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2015-8386","tags":["web"]},{"url":"https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2015-8387","tags":["web"]},{"url":"https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2015-8388","tags":["web"]},{"url":"https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2015-8389","tags":["web"]},{"url":"https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2015-8390","tags":["web"]},{"url":"https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2015-8391","tags":["web"]},{"url":"https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2015-8392","tags":["web"]},{"url":"https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2015-8393","tags":["web"]},{"url":"https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2015-8394","tags":["web"]},{"url":"https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2015-8395","tags":["web"]},{"url":"https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2015-8806","tags":["web"]},{"url":"https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2015-8842","tags":["web"]},{"url":"https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2015-8853","tags":["web"]},{"url":"https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2015-8948","tags":["web"]},{"url":"https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2016-0634","tags":["web"]},{"url":"https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2016-0718","tags":["web"]},{"url":"https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2016-0787","tags":["web"]},{"url":"https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2016-1234","tags":["web"]},{"url":"https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2016-1238","tags":["web"]},{"url":"https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2016-1283","tags":["web"]},{"url":"https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2016-1762","tags":["web"]},{"url":"https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2016-1833","tags":["web"]},{"url":"https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2016-1834","tags":["web"]},{"url":"https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2016-1835","tags":["web"]},{"url":"https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2016-1837","tags":["web"]},{"url":"https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2016-1838","tags":["web"]},{"url":"https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2016-1839","tags":["web"]},{"url":"https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2016-1840","tags":["web"]},{"url":"https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2016-2037","tags":["web"]},{"url":"https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2016-2073","tags":["web"]},{"url":"https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2016-2105","tags":["web"]},{"url":"https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2016-2106","tags":["web"]},{"url":"https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2016-2107","tags":["web"]},{"url":"https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2016-2108","tags":["web"]},{"url":"https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2016-2109","tags":["web"]},{"url":"https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2016-2177","tags":["web"]},{"url":"https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2016-2178","tags":["web"]},{"url":"https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2016-2179","tags":["web"]},{"url":"https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2016-2180","tags":["web"]},{"url":"https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2016-2181","tags":["web"]},{"url":"https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2016-2182","tags":["web"]},{"url":"https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2016-2183","tags":["web"]},{"url":"https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2016-2381","tags":["web"]},{"url":"https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2016-3075","tags":["web"]},{"url":"https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2016-3191","tags":["web"]},{"url":"https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2016-3627","tags":["web"]},{"url":"https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2016-3705","tags":["web"]},{"url":"https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2016-3706","tags":["web"]},{"url":"https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2016-4008","tags":["web"]},{"url":"https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2016-4429","tags":["web"]},{"url":"https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2016-4447","tags":["web"]},{"url":"https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2016-4448","tags":["web"]},{"url":"https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2016-4449","tags":["web"]},{"url":"https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2016-4483","tags":["web"]},{"url":"https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2016-4574","tags":["web"]},{"url":"https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2016-4579","tags":["web"]},{"url":"https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2016-4658","tags":["web"]},{"url":"https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2016-5011","tags":["web"]},{"url":"https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2016-5300","tags":["web"]},{"url":"https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2016-5419","tags":["web"]},{"url":"https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2016-5420","tags":["web"]},{"url":"https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2016-5421","tags":["web"]},{"url":"https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2016-6185","tags":["web"]},{"url":"https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2016-6261","tags":["web"]},{"url":"https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2016-6262","tags":["web"]},{"url":"https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2016-6263","tags":["web"]},{"url":"https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2016-6302","tags":["web"]},{"url":"https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2016-6303","tags":["web"]},{"url":"https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2016-6304","tags":["web"]},{"url":"https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2016-6306","tags":["web"]},{"url":"https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2016-6313","tags":["web"]},{"url":"https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2016-6318","tags":["web"]},{"url":"https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2016-7141","tags":["web"]},{"url":"https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2016-7167","tags":["web"]},{"url":"https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2016-7543","tags":["web"]},{"url":"https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2016-7796","tags":["web"]},{"url":"https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2016-8615","tags":["web"]},{"url":"https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2016-8616","tags":["web"]},{"url":"https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2016-8617","tags":["web"]},{"url":"https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2016-8618","tags":["web"]},{"url":"https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2016-8619","tags":["web"]},{"url":"https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2016-8620","tags":["web"]},{"url":"https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2016-8621","tags":["web"]},{"url":"https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2016-8622","tags":["web"]},{"url":"https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2016-8623","tags":["web"]},{"url":"https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2016-8624","tags":["web"]},{"url":"https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2016-9063","tags":["web"]},{"url":"https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2016-9318","tags":["web"]},{"url":"https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2016-9586","tags":["web"]},{"url":"https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2016-9597","tags":["web"]},{"url":"https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2016-9840","tags":["web"]},{"url":"https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2016-9841","tags":["web"]},{"url":"https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2016-9842","tags":["web"]},{"url":"https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2016-9843","tags":["web"]},{"url":"https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2017-1000100","tags":["web"]},{"url":"https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2017-1000101","tags":["web"]},{"url":"https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2017-1000366","tags":["web"]},{"url":"https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2017-10684","tags":["web"]},{"url":"https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2017-10685","tags":["web"]},{"url":"https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2017-11112","tags":["web"]},{"url":"https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2017-11113","tags":["web"]},{"url":"https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2017-2616","tags":["web"]},{"url":"https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2017-7407","tags":["web"]},{"url":"https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2017-7526","tags":["web"]},{"url":"https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2017-9047","tags":["web"]},{"url":"https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2017-9048","tags":["web"]},{"url":"https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2017-9049","tags":["web"]},{"url":"https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2017-9050","tags":["web"]},{"url":"https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2017-9233","tags":["web"]},{"url":"https://www.suse.com/support/update/announcement/2017/suse-su-20172700-1/","tags":["advisory"]},{"url":"https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2015-0860","tags":["web"]},{"url":"https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2016-7056","tags":["web"]},{"url":"https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2016-8610","tags":["web"]},{"url":"https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2017-3731","tags":["web"]},{"url":"https://ubuntu.com/security/CVE-2017-6507","tags":["report"]},{"url":"https://ubuntu.com/security/notices/USN-3247-1","tags":["advisory"]},{"url":"https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2017-6507","tags":["report"]},{"url":"","tags":["advisory"]}],"sources":{"cve":[{"id":"CVE-2017-6507","description":"An issue was discovered in AppArmor before 2.12. Incorrect handling of unknown AppArmor profiles in AppArmor init scripts, upstart jobs, and/or systemd unit files allows an attacker to possibly have increased attack surfaces of processes that were intended to be confined by AppArmor. This is due to the common logic to handle 'restart' operations removing AppArmor profiles that aren't found in the typical filesystem locations, such as /etc/apparmor.d/. Userspace projects that manage their own AppArmor profiles in atypical directories, such as what's done by LXD and Docker, are affected by this flaw in the AppArmor init script logic.","status":"published","published":"2017-03-24T06:56:00Z","modified":"2024-08-05T15:33:20.013Z","updated_at":"2026-11-02T14:33:16.578111Z"}],"euvd":[{"id":"EUVD-2017-15563","description":"An issue was discovered in AppArmor before 2.12. Incorrect handling of unknown AppArmor profiles in AppArmor init scripts, upstart jobs, and/or systemd unit files allows an attacker to possibly have increased attack surfaces of processes that were intended to be confined by AppArmor. This is due to the common logic to handle 'restart' operations removing AppArmor profiles that aren't found in the typical filesystem locations, such as /etc/apparmor.d/. Userspace projects that manage their own AppArmor profiles in atypical directories, such as what's done by LXD and Docker, are affected by this flaw in the AppArmor init script logic.","status":"published","published":"2017-03-24T06:56:00Z","modified":"2024-08-05T15:33:20Z","updated_at":"2026-11-03T02:39:12.023695Z"}],"ghsa":[{"id":"GHSA-44p8-9hqx-3rqg","title":"An issue was discovered in AppArmor before 2.12. Incorrect handling of unknown AppArmor profiles...","description":"An issue was discovered in AppArmor before 2.12. Incorrect handling of unknown AppArmor profiles in AppArmor init scripts, upstart jobs, and/or systemd unit files allows an attacker to possibly have increased attack surfaces of processes that were intended to be confined by AppArmor. This is due to the common logic to handle 'restart' operations removing AppArmor profiles that aren't found in the typical filesystem locations, such as /etc/apparmor.d/. Userspace projects that manage their own AppArmor profiles in atypical directories, such as what's done by LXD and Docker, are affected by this flaw in the AppArmor init script logic.","status":"published","published":"2022-05-13T01:46:36Z","modified":"2023-02-02T05:01:32Z","cvss":[{"version":"3.0","score":5.9,"vector":"CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N","level":"medium"}],"cwes":["CWE-269"],"updated_at":"2026-11-02T14:51:12.391632Z"}],"nvd":[{"id":"CVE-2017-6507","description":"An issue was discovered in AppArmor before 2.12. Incorrect handling of unknown AppArmor profiles in AppArmor init scripts, upstart jobs, and/or systemd unit files allows an attacker to possibly have increased attack surfaces of processes that were intended to be confined by AppArmor. This is due to the common logic to handle 'restart' operations removing AppArmor profiles that aren't found in the typical filesystem locations, such as /etc/apparmor.d/. Userspace projects that manage their own AppArmor profiles in atypical directories, such as what's done by LXD and Docker, are affected by this flaw in the AppArmor init script logic.","status":"published","published":"2017-03-24T07:59:00.233Z","modified":"2026-06-17T01:22:28.247Z","cvss":[{"version":"3.0","score":5.9,"vector":"CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N","level":"medium","assessor":"primary"},{"version":"2.0","score":4.3,"vector":"AV:N/AC:M/Au:N/C:N/I:P/A:N","level":"medium","assessor":"primary"}],"cwes":["CWE-269"],"updated_at":"2026-11-02T14:03:44.275273Z"}],"osv":[{"id":"CVE-2017-6507","description":"An issue was discovered in AppArmor before 2.12. Incorrect handling of unknown AppArmor profiles in AppArmor init scripts, upstart jobs, and/or systemd unit files allows an attacker to possibly have increased attack surfaces of processes that were intended to be confined by AppArmor. This is due to the common logic to handle 'restart' operations removing AppArmor profiles that aren't found in the typical filesystem locations, such as /etc/apparmor.d/. Userspace projects that manage their own AppArmor profiles in atypical directories, such as what's done by LXD and Docker, are affected by this flaw in the AppArmor init script logic.","status":"published","published":"2017-03-24T07:59:00.233Z","modified":"2026-03-15T22:17:39.480179Z","cvss":[{"version":"3.0","score":5.9,"vector":"CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N","level":"medium"}],"updated_at":"2026-11-02T15:44:06.412595Z"},{"id":"DEBIAN-CVE-2017-6507","description":"An issue was discovered in AppArmor before 2.12. Incorrect handling of unknown AppArmor profiles in AppArmor init scripts, upstart jobs, and/or systemd unit files allows an attacker to possibly have increased attack surfaces of processes that were intended to be confined by AppArmor. This is due to the common logic to handle 'restart' operations removing AppArmor profiles that aren't found in the typical filesystem locations, such as /etc/apparmor.d/. Userspace projects that manage their own AppArmor profiles in atypical directories, such as what's done by LXD and Docker, are affected by this flaw in the AppArmor init script logic.","status":"published","published":"2017-03-24T07:59:00.233Z","modified":"2026-09-01T20:03:49.313764676Z","cvss":[{"version":"3.0","score":5.9,"vector":"CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N","level":"medium"}],"updated_at":"2026-11-02T15:45:29.412243Z"},{"id":"UBUNTU-CVE-2017-6507","description":"An issue was discovered in AppArmor before 2.12. Incorrect handling of unknown AppArmor profiles in AppArmor init scripts, upstart jobs, and/or systemd unit files allows an attacker to possibly have increased attack surfaces of processes that were intended to be confined by AppArmor. This is due to the common logic to handle 'restart' operations removing AppArmor profiles that aren't found in the typical filesystem locations, such as /etc/apparmor.d/. Userspace projects that manage their own AppArmor profiles in atypical directories, such as what's done by LXD and Docker, are affected by this flaw in the AppArmor init script logic.","status":"published","published":"2017-03-24T00:00:00Z","modified":"2026-04-22T11:29:10.117011Z","cvss":[{"version":"3.0","score":5.9,"vector":"CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N","level":"medium"}],"updated_at":"2026-11-02T15:54:15.773974Z"},{"id":"openSUSE-SU-2024:10627-1","title":"apache2-mod_apparmor-3.0.3-3.2 on GA media","description":"These are all security issues fixed in the apache2-mod_apparmor-3.0.3-3.2 package on the GA media of openSUSE Tumbleweed.","status":"published","published":"2024-06-15T00:00:00Z","modified":"2026-02-04T03:31:33.575892Z","updated_at":"2026-11-02T16:58:34.487567Z"},{"id":"SUSE-SU-2017:1151-1","title":"Security update for apparmor","description":"\nThis update for apparmor provides the following fixes:\n\nThis security issue was fixed:\n\n- CVE-2017-6507: Preserve unknown profiles when reloading apparmor.service (bsc#1029696)\n\nThese non-security issues were fixed:\n\n- Add tunables/kernelvars abstraction. (bsc#1031529)\n- Update flags of ntpd profile. (bsc#1022610)\n- Force AppArmor to start after /var/lib mounts. (bsc#1016259)\n- Update mlmmj profiles. (bsc#1000201)\n","status":"published","published":"2017-05-03T07:09:00Z","modified":"2026-02-04T02:20:30.406475Z","updated_at":"2026-11-02T15:53:43.83457Z"},{"id":"SUSE-SU-2017:2699-1","title":"Security update for SLES 12 Docker image","description":"The SUSE Linux Enterprise Server 12 container image has been updated to include\nsecurity and stability fixes.\n\nThe following issues related to building of the container images have been fixed:\n\n- Included krb5 package to avoid the inclusion of krb5-mini which gets selected as a\n  dependency by the Build Service solver. (bsc#1056193)\n- Do not install recommended packages when building container images. (bsc#975726)\n\nA number of security issues that have been already fixed by updates released for\nSUSE Linux Enterprise Server 12 are now included in the base image. A package/CVE\ncross-reference is available below.\n\npam:\n\n- CVE-2015-3238\n\nlibtasn1:\n\n- CVE-2015-3622\n- CVE-2016-4008\n\nlibidn:\n\n- CVE-2015-2059\n- CVE-2015-8948\n- CVE-2016-6261\n- CVE-2016-6262\n- CVE-2016-6263\n\nzlib:\n\n- CVE-2016-9840\n- CVE-2016-9841\n- CVE-2016-9842\n- CVE-2016-9843\n\ncurl:\n\n- CVE-2016-5419\n- CVE-2016-5420\n- CVE-2016-5421\n- CVE-2016-7141\n- CVE-2016-7167\n- CVE-2016-8615\n- CVE-2016-8616\n- CVE-2016-8617\n- CVE-2016-8618\n- CVE-2016-8619\n- CVE-2016-8620\n- CVE-2016-8621\n- CVE-2016-8622\n- CVE-2016-8623\n- CVE-2016-8624\n- CVE-2016-9586\n- CVE-2017-1000100\n- CVE-2017-1000101\n- CVE-2017-7407\n\nopenssl:\n\n- CVE-2016-2105\n- CVE-2016-2106\n- CVE-2016-2107\n- CVE-2016-2108\n- CVE-2016-2109\n- CVE-2016-2177\n- CVE-2016-2178\n- CVE-2016-2179\n- CVE-2016-2180\n- CVE-2016-2181\n- CVE-2016-2182\n- CVE-2016-2183\n- CVE-2016-6302\n- CVE-2016-6303\n- CVE-2016-6304\n- CVE-2016-6306\n\nlibxml2:\n\n- CVE-2014-0191\n- CVE-2015-8806\n- CVE-2016-1762\n- CVE-2016-1833\n- CVE-2016-1834\n- CVE-2016-1835\n- CVE-2016-1837\n- CVE-2016-1838\n- CVE-2016-1839\n- CVE-2016-1840\n- CVE-2016-2073\n- CVE-2016-3627\n- CVE-2016-3705\n- CVE-2016-4447\n- CVE-2016-4448\n- CVE-2016-4449\n- CVE-2016-4483\n- CVE-2016-4658\n- CVE-2016-9318\n- CVE-2016-9597\n- CVE-2017-9047\n- CVE-2017-9048\n- CVE-2017-9049\n- CVE-2017-9050\n\nutil-linux:\n\n- CVE-2015-5218\n- CVE-2016-5011\n- CVE-2017-2616\n\ncracklib:\n\n- CVE-2016-6318\n\nsystemd:\n\n- CVE-2014-9770\n- CVE-2015-8842\n- CVE-2016-7796\n\npcre:\n\n- CVE-2014-8964\n- CVE-2015-2325\n- CVE-2015-2327\n- CVE-2015-2328\n- CVE-2015-3210\n- CVE-2015-3217\n- CVE-2015-5073\n- CVE-2015-8380\n- CVE-2015-8381\n- CVE-2015-8382\n- CVE-2015-8383\n- CVE-2015-8384\n- CVE-2015-8385\n- CVE-2015-8386\n- CVE-2015-8387\n- CVE-2015-8388\n- CVE-2015-8389\n- CVE-2015-8390\n- CVE-2015-8391\n- CVE-2015-8392\n- CVE-2015-8393\n- CVE-2015-8394\n- CVE-2015-8395\n- CVE-2016-1283\n- CVE-2016-3191\n\nappamor:\n\n- CVE-2017-6507\n\nbash:\n\n- CVE-2014-6277\n- CVE-2014-6278\n- CVE-2016-0634\n- CVE-2016-7543\n\ncpio:\n\n- CVE-2016-2037\n\nglibc:\n\n- CVE-2016-1234\n- CVE-2016-3075\n- CVE-2016-3706\n- CVE-2016-4429\n- CVE-2017-1000366\n\nperl:\n\n- CVE-2015-8853\n- CVE-2016-1238\n- CVE-2016-2381\n- CVE-2016-6185\n\nlibssh2_org:\n\n- CVE-2016-0787\n\nexpat:\n\n- CVE-2012-6702\n- CVE-2015-1283\n- CVE-2016-0718\n- CVE-2016-5300\n- CVE-2016-9063\n- CVE-2017-9233\n\nncurses:\n\n- CVE-2017-10684\n- CVE-2017-10685\n- CVE-2017-11112\n- CVE-2017-11113\n\nlibksba:\n\n- CVE-2016-4574\n- CVE-2016-4579\n\nlibgcrypt:\n\n- CVE-2015-7511\n- CVE-2016-6313\n- CVE-2017-7526\n\ndbus-1:\n\n- CVE-2014-7824\n- CVE-2015-0245\n\nFinally, the following packages received non-security fixes:\n\n- augeas\n- bzip2\n- ca-certificates-mozilla\n- coreutils\n- cryptsetup\n- cyrus-sasl\n- dirmngr\n- e2fsprogs\n- findutils\n- gpg2\n- insserv-compat\n- kmod\n- libcap\n- libsolv\n- libzypp\n- openldap2\n- p11-kit\n- permissions\n- procps\n- rpm\n- sed\n- shadow\n- zypper\n","status":"published","published":"2017-10-10T19:37:24Z","modified":"2026-02-04T03:24:03.922844Z","updated_at":"2026-11-02T15:53:44.209561Z"},{"id":"SUSE-SU-2017:2700-1","title":"Security update for SLES 12-SP1 Docker image","description":"The SUSE Linux Enterprise Server 12 SP1 container image has been updated to include\nsecurity and stability fixes.\n\nThe following issues related to building of the container images have been fixed:\n\n- Included krb5 package to avoid the inclusion of krb5-mini which gets selected as a\n  dependency by the Build Service solver. (bsc#1056193)\n- Do not install recommended packages when building container images. (bsc#975726)\n\nA number of security issues that have been already fixed by updates released for\nSUSE Linux Enterprise Server 12 SP1 are now included in the base image. A package/CVE\ncross-reference is available below.\n\npam:\n\n- CVE-2015-3238\n\nlibtasn1:\n\n- CVE-2015-3622\n- CVE-2016-4008\n\nexpat:\n\nexpat:\n\n- CVE-2012-6702\n- CVE-2015-1283\n- CVE-2016-0718\n- CVE-2016-5300\n- CVE-2016-9063\n- CVE-2017-9233\n\nlibidn:\n\n- CVE-2015-2059\n- CVE-2015-8948\n- CVE-2016-6261\n- CVE-2016-6262\n- CVE-2016-6263\n\n\nzlib:\n\n- CVE-2016-9840\n- CVE-2016-9841\n- CVE-2016-9842\n- CVE-2016-9843\n\ncurl:\n\n- CVE-2016-5419\n- CVE-2016-5420\n- CVE-2016-5421\n- CVE-2016-7141\n- CVE-2016-7167\n- CVE-2016-8615\n- CVE-2016-8616\n- CVE-2016-8617\n- CVE-2016-8618\n- CVE-2016-8619\n- CVE-2016-8620\n- CVE-2016-8621\n- CVE-2016-8622\n- CVE-2016-8623\n- CVE-2016-8624\n- CVE-2016-9586\n- CVE-2017-1000100\n- CVE-2017-1000101\n- CVE-2017-7407\n\nopenssl:\n\n- CVE-2016-2105\n- CVE-2016-2106\n- CVE-2016-2107\n- CVE-2016-2108\n- CVE-2016-2109\n- CVE-2016-2177\n- CVE-2016-2178\n- CVE-2016-2179\n- CVE-2016-2180\n- CVE-2016-2181\n- CVE-2016-2182\n- CVE-2016-2183\n- CVE-2016-6302\n- CVE-2016-6303\n- CVE-2016-6304\n- CVE-2016-6306\n- CVE-2016-7056\n- CVE-2016-8610\n- CVE-2017-3731\n\ncracklib:\n\n- CVE-2016-6318\n\npcre:\n\n- CVE-2014-8964\n- CVE-2015-2325\n- CVE-2015-2327\n- CVE-2015-2328\n- CVE-2015-3210\n- CVE-2015-3217\n- CVE-2015-5073\n- CVE-2015-8380\n- CVE-2015-8381\n- CVE-2015-8382\n- CVE-2015-8383\n- CVE-2015-8384\n- CVE-2015-8385\n- CVE-2015-8386\n- CVE-2015-8387\n- CVE-2015-8388\n- CVE-2015-8389\n- CVE-2015-8390\n- CVE-2015-8391\n- CVE-2015-8392\n- CVE-2015-8393\n- CVE-2015-8394\n- CVE-2015-8395\n- CVE-2016-1283\n- CVE-2016-3191\n\nappamor:\n\n- CVE-2017-6507\n\nbash:\n\n- CVE-2014-6277\n- CVE-2014-6278\n- CVE-2016-0634\n- CVE-2016-7543\n\ncpio:\n\n- CVE-2016-2037\n\nglibc:\n\n- CVE-2016-1234\n- CVE-2016-3075\n- CVE-2016-3706\n- CVE-2016-4429\n- CVE-2017-1000366\n\nperl:\n\n- CVE-2015-8853\n- CVE-2016-1238\n- CVE-2016-2381\n- CVE-2016-6185\n\nlibssh2_org:\n\n- CVE-2016-0787\n\nutil-linux:\n\n- CVE-2016-5011\n- CVE-2017-2616\n\nncurses:\n\n- CVE-2017-10684\n- CVE-2017-10685\n- CVE-2017-11112\n- CVE-2017-11113\n\nlibksba:\n\n- CVE-2016-4574\n- CVE-2016-4579\n\nlibxml2:\n\n- CVE-2014-0191\n- CVE-2015-8806\n- CVE-2016-1762\n- CVE-2016-1833\n- CVE-2016-1834\n- CVE-2016-1835\n- CVE-2016-1837\n- CVE-2016-1838\n- CVE-2016-1839\n- CVE-2016-1840\n- CVE-2016-2073\n- CVE-2016-3627\n- CVE-2016-3705\n- CVE-2016-4447\n- CVE-2016-4448\n- CVE-2016-4449\n- CVE-2016-4483\n- CVE-2016-4658\n- CVE-2016-9318\n- CVE-2016-9597\n- CVE-2017-9047\n- CVE-2017-9048\n- CVE-2017-9049\n- CVE-2017-9050\n\nlibgcrypt:\n\n- CVE-2015-7511\n- CVE-2016-6313\n- CVE-2017-7526\n\nupdate-alternatives:\n\n- CVE-2015-0860\n\nsystemd:\n\n- CVE-2014-9770\n- CVE-2015-8842\n- CVE-2016-7796\n\ndbus-1:\n\n- CVE-2014-7824\n- CVE-2015-0245\n\nFinally, the following packages received non-security fixes:\n\n- augeas\n- bzip2\n- ca-certificates-mozilla\n- coreutils\n- cryptsetup\n- cyrus-sasl\n- dirmngr\n- e2fsprogs\n- findutils\n- gpg2\n- insserv-compat\n- kmod\n- libcap\n- libsolv\n- libzypp\n- lua51\n- lvm2\n- netcfg\n- p11-kit\n- permissions\n- procps\n- rpm\n- sed\n- sg3_utils\n- shadow\n- zypper\n","status":"published","published":"2017-10-10T19:37:36Z","modified":"2026-02-04T03:03:17.897778Z","updated_at":"2026-11-02T15:53:44.209561Z"},{"id":"USN-3247-1","title":"apparmor vulnerability","description":"Stéphane Graber discovered that AppArmor incorrectly unloaded some profiles\nwhen restarted or upgraded, contrary to expected behavior.\n","status":"published","published":"2017-03-28T19:11:09Z","modified":"2026-04-22T09:34:18.462068Z","updated_at":"2026-11-02T16:58:10.303275Z"}]}}