{"id":"CVE-2022-3294","aliases":["DEBIAN-CVE-2022-3294","EUVD-2023-1049","GHSA-jh36-q97c-9928","GO-2023-1629","OESA-2023-1413","OESA-2023-1414","OESA-2023-1415","OESA-2023-1416","RHBA-2023:0452","SUSE-SU-2023:2292-1","UBUNTU-CVE-2022-3294","openSUSE-SU-2024:12737-1","openSUSE-SU-2024:12780-1","openSUSE-SU-2024:12781-1","openSUSE-SU-2024:12810-1","openSUSE-SU-2025:15424-1"],"status":"published","title":"Node address isn't always verified when proxying","description":"Users may have access to secure endpoints in the control plane network. Kubernetes clusters are only affected if an untrusted user can modify Node objects and send proxy requests to them. Kubernetes supports node proxying, which allows clients of kube-apiserver to access endpoints of a Kubelet to establish connections to Pods, retrieve container logs, and more. While Kubernetes already validates the proxying address for Nodes, a bug in kube-apiserver made it possible to bypass this validation. Bypassing this validation could allow authenticated requests destined for Nodes to to the API server's private network.","severity":{"version":"3.1","score":6.6,"vector":"CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H","level":"medium","assessor":"cna","from":"cve"},"epss":{"day":"2026-11-09","score":0.01618,"percentile":0.7622,"model":"v2026.06.15"},"facts":{"in_kev":false,"known_exploited":false,"public_exploit":true,"fix_available":true},"cwes":["CWE-20"],"published":"2023-03-01T00:00:00Z","modified":"2026-11-03T08:01:21Z","exploits":[{"source":"pocgithub","id":"arbaaz29/CVE-2022-3294","title":"arbaaz29/CVE-2022-3294","date":"2026-01-14","url":"https://github.com/arbaaz29/CVE-2022-3294"}],"fixes":[{"ecosystem":"Go","package":"github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes","fixed_in":["1.25.4","1.22.16","1.24.8","1.23.14"],"sources":["ghsa","osv"]},{"ecosystem":"Debian:12","package":"kubernetes","fixed_in":["1.20.5+really1.20.2-1"],"sources":["osv"]},{"ecosystem":"Debian:13","package":"kubernetes","fixed_in":["1.20.5+really1.20.2-1"],"sources":["osv"]},{"ecosystem":"Debian:14","package":"kubernetes","fixed_in":["1.20.5+really1.20.2-1"],"sources":["osv"]},{"ecosystem":"Go","package":"k8s.io/kubernetes","fixed_in":["1.22.16","1.23.14","1.24.8","1.25.4"],"sources":["osv"]},{"ecosystem":"Red Hat:openshift:4.12::el8","package":"microshift","fixed_in":["0:4.12.1-202301261525.p0.g3db9e81.assembly.4.12.1.el8"],"sources":["osv"]}],"affected":[{"source":"ghsa","ecosystem":"Go","package":"github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes","ranges":[{"type":"ECOSYSTEM","events":[{"introduced":"1.25.0"},{"fixed":"1.25.4"}]}]},{"source":"ghsa","ecosystem":"Go","package":"github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes","ranges":[{"type":"ECOSYSTEM","events":[{"introduced":"1.22.0"},{"fixed":"1.22.16"}]}]},{"source":"ghsa","ecosystem":"Go","package":"github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes","ranges":[{"type":"ECOSYSTEM","events":[{"introduced":"1.24.0"},{"fixed":"1.24.8"}]}]},{"source":"ghsa","ecosystem":"Go","package":"github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes","ranges":[{"type":"ECOSYSTEM","events":[{"introduced":"1.23.0"},{"fixed":"1.23.14"}]}]},{"source":"osv","ecosystem":"Debian:12","package":"kubernetes","ranges":[{"type":"ECOSYSTEM","events":[{"introduced":"0"},{"fixed":"1.20.5+really1.20.2-1"}]}]},{"source":"osv","ecosystem":"Debian:13","package":"kubernetes","ranges":[{"type":"ECOSYSTEM","events":[{"introduced":"0"},{"fixed":"1.20.5+really1.20.2-1"}]}]},{"source":"osv","ecosystem":"Debian:14","package":"kubernetes","ranges":[{"type":"ECOSYSTEM","events":[{"introduced":"0"},{"fixed":"1.20.5+really1.20.2-1"}]}]},{"source":"osv","ecosystem":"Go","package":"github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes","ranges":[{"type":"SEMVER","events":[{"introduced":"1.25.0"},{"fixed":"1.25.4"}]}]},{"source":"osv","ecosystem":"Go","package":"github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes","ranges":[{"type":"SEMVER","events":[{"introduced":"1.24.0"},{"fixed":"1.24.8"}]}]},{"source":"osv","ecosystem":"Go","package":"github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes","ranges":[{"type":"SEMVER","events":[{"introduced":"1.23.0"},{"fixed":"1.23.14"}]}]},{"source":"osv","ecosystem":"Go","package":"github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes","ranges":[{"type":"SEMVER","events":[{"introduced":"1.22.0"},{"fixed":"1.22.16"}]}]},{"source":"osv","ecosystem":"Go","package":"k8s.io/kubernetes","ranges":[{"type":"SEMVER","events":[{"introduced":"1.22.0"},{"fixed":"1.22.16"},{"introduced":"1.23.0"},{"fixed":"1.23.14"},{"introduced":"1.24.0"},{"fixed":"1.24.8"},{"introduced":"1.25.0"},{"fixed":"1.25.4"}]}]},{"source":"osv","ecosystem":"openEuler:20.03-LTS-SP3","package":"kubernetes","ranges":[{"type":"ECOSYSTEM","events":[{"introduced":"0"},{"fixed":"1.20.2-20.oe1"}]}],"bundled":5},{"source":"osv","ecosystem":"openEuler:22.03-LTS","package":"kubernetes","ranges":[{"type":"ECOSYSTEM","events":[{"introduced":"0"},{"fixed":"1.20.2-20.oe2203"}]}],"bundled":5},{"source":"osv","ecosystem":"openEuler:22.03-LTS-SP1","package":"kubernetes","ranges":[{"type":"ECOSYSTEM","events":[{"introduced":"0"},{"fixed":"1.20.2-20.oe2203sp1"}]}],"bundled":5},{"source":"osv","ecosystem":"openEuler:22.03-LTS-SP2","package":"kubernetes","ranges":[{"type":"ECOSYSTEM","events":[{"introduced":"0"},{"fixed":"1.20.2-20.oe2203sp2"}]}],"bundled":5},{"source":"osv","ecosystem":"Red Hat:openshift:4.12::el8","package":"microshift","ranges":[{"type":"ECOSYSTEM","events":[{"introduced":"0"},{"fixed":"0:4.12.1-202301261525.p0.g3db9e81.assembly.4.12.1.el8"}]}]},{"source":"osv","ecosystem":"SUSE:Linux Enterprise Module for Containers 15 SP4","package":"kubernetes1.23","ranges":[{"type":"ECOSYSTEM","events":[{"introduced":"0"},{"fixed":"1.23.17-150300.7.6.1"}]}],"bundled":3},{"source":"osv","ecosystem":"SUSE:Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 15 SP3-ESPOS","package":"kubernetes1.23","ranges":[{"type":"ECOSYSTEM","events":[{"introduced":"0"},{"fixed":"1.23.17-150300.7.6.1"}]}],"bundled":3},{"source":"osv","ecosystem":"SUSE:Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 15 SP3-LTSS","package":"kubernetes1.23","ranges":[{"type":"ECOSYSTEM","events":[{"introduced":"0"},{"fixed":"1.23.17-150300.7.6.1"}]}],"bundled":3},{"source":"osv","ecosystem":"SUSE:Linux Enterprise Server 15 SP3-LTSS","package":"kubernetes1.23","ranges":[{"type":"ECOSYSTEM","events":[{"introduced":"0"},{"fixed":"1.23.17-150300.7.6.1"}]}],"bundled":3},{"source":"osv","ecosystem":"SUSE:Linux Enterprise Server for SAP Applications 15 SP3","package":"kubernetes1.23","ranges":[{"type":"ECOSYSTEM","events":[{"introduced":"0"},{"fixed":"1.23.17-150300.7.6.1"}]}],"bundled":3},{"source":"osv","ecosystem":"SUSE:Enterprise Storage 7.1","package":"kubernetes1.23","ranges":[{"type":"ECOSYSTEM","events":[{"introduced":"0"},{"fixed":"1.23.17-150300.7.6.1"}]}],"bundled":3},{"source":"osv","ecosystem":"openSUSE:Tumbleweed","package":"kubernetes1.25","ranges":[{"type":"ECOSYSTEM","events":[{"introduced":"0"},{"fixed":"1.25.7-1.1"}]}],"bundled":3},{"source":"osv","ecosystem":"openSUSE:Tumbleweed","package":"govulncheck-vulndb","ranges":[{"type":"ECOSYSTEM","events":[{"introduced":"0"},{"fixed":"0.0.20250807T150727-1.1"}]}],"bundled":44}],"products":[{"vendor":"kubernetes","product":"kubernetes"}],"references":[{"url":"https://groups.google.com/g/kubernetes-security-announce/c/VyPOxF7CIbA","tags":["x_transferred","Mailing List","Third Party Advisory","web"]},{"url":"https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/issues/113757","tags":["x_transferred","Patch","Vendor Advisory","report","web","article"]},{"url":"https://security.netapp.com/advisory/ntap-20230505-0007/","tags":["x_transferred","advisory"]},{"url":"https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2022-3294","tags":["advisory"]},{"url":"https://github.com/advisories/GHSA-jh36-q97c-9928","tags":["advisory"]},{"url":"https://github.com/CVEProject/cvelistV5/tree/main/cves/2022/3xxx/CVE-2022-3294.json","tags":["advisory"]},{"url":"https://security-tracker.debian.org/tracker/CVE-2022-3294","tags":["advisory"]},{"url":"https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes","tags":["package"]},{"url":"https://security.netapp.com/advisory/ntap-20230505-0007","tags":["web"]},{"url":"https://www.openeuler.org/en/security/safety-bulletin/detail.html?id=openEuler-SA-2023-1413","tags":["advisory"]},{"url":"https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2022-3162","tags":["advisory"]},{"url":"https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2023-2431","tags":["advisory"]},{"url":"https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2023-2727","tags":["advisory"]},{"url":"https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2023-2728","tags":["advisory"]},{"url":"https://www.openeuler.org/en/security/safety-bulletin/detail.html?id=openEuler-SA-2023-1414","tags":["advisory"]},{"url":"https://www.openeuler.org/en/security/safety-bulletin/detail.html?id=openEuler-SA-2023-1415","tags":["advisory"]},{"url":"https://www.openeuler.org/en/security/safety-bulletin/detail.html?id=openEuler-SA-2023-1416","tags":["advisory"]},{"url":"https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2023:0452","tags":["advisory"]},{"url":"https://issues.redhat.com/browse/OCPBUGS-4983","tags":["article"]},{"url":"https://issues.redhat.com/browse/OCPBUGS-5549","tags":["article"]},{"url":"https://issues.redhat.com/browse/OCPBUGS-5859","tags":["article"]},{"url":"https://security.access.redhat.com/data/csaf/v2/advisories/2023/rhba-2023_0452.json","tags":["advisory"]},{"url":"https://access.redhat.com/security/cve/CVE-2022-3294","tags":["report"]},{"url":"https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2136675","tags":["report"]},{"url":"https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-3294","tags":["advisory","report"]},{"url":"https://www.suse.com/support/update/announcement/2023/suse-su-20232292-1/","tags":["advisory"]},{"url":"https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2021-25749","tags":["web"]},{"url":"https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2022-3162","tags":["web"]},{"url":"https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2022-3294","tags":["web"]},{"url":"https://ubuntu.com/security/CVE-2022-3294","tags":["report"]},{"url":"","tags":["advisory"]},{"url":"https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2022-27664","tags":["web"]},{"url":"https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2015-7561","tags":["web"]},{"url":"https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2016-9962","tags":["web"]},{"url":"https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2017-1000056","tags":["web"]},{"url":"https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2017-1002102","tags":["web"]},{"url":"https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2018-1002100","tags":["web"]},{"url":"https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2018-1002101","tags":["web"]},{"url":"https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2018-16733","tags":["web"]},{"url":"https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2018-19184","tags":["web"]},{"url":"https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2019-1002100","tags":["web"]},{"url":"https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2019-1002101","tags":["web"]},{"url":"https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2019-11245","tags":["web"]},{"url":"https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2019-11251","tags":["web"]},{"url":"https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2019-11253","tags":["web"]},{"url":"https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2020-26240","tags":["web"]},{"url":"https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2020-26241","tags":["web"]},{"url":"https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2020-8551","tags":["web"]},{"url":"https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2020-8555","tags":["web"]},{"url":"https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2020-8557","tags":["web"]},{"url":"https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2020-8558","tags":["web"]},{"url":"https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2020-8562","tags":["web"]},{"url":"https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2020-8563","tags":["web"]},{"url":"https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2020-8566","tags":["web"]},{"url":"https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2021-25735","tags":["web"]},{"url":"https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2021-25736","tags":["web"]},{"url":"https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2021-25737","tags":["web"]},{"url":"https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2021-25741","tags":["web"]},{"url":"https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2021-25743","tags":["web"]},{"url":"https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2021-30465","tags":["web"]},{"url":"https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2022-29162","tags":["web"]},{"url":"https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2022-29177","tags":["web"]},{"url":"https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2023-2431","tags":["web"]},{"url":"https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2023-25809","tags":["web"]},{"url":"https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2023-2727","tags":["web"]},{"url":"https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2023-2728","tags":["web"]},{"url":"https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2023-27561","tags":["web"]},{"url":"https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2023-28642","tags":["web"]},{"url":"https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2023-5528","tags":["web"]},{"url":"https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2024-45310","tags":["web"]},{"url":"https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2024-5321","tags":["web"]},{"url":"https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2025-3445","tags":["web"]},{"url":"https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2025-47907","tags":["web"]},{"url":"https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2025-47908","tags":["web"]}],"sources":{"cve":[{"id":"CVE-2022-3294","title":"Node address isn't always verified when proxying","description":"Users may have access to secure endpoints in the control plane network. Kubernetes clusters are only affected if an untrusted user can modify Node objects and send proxy requests to them. Kubernetes supports node proxying, which allows clients of kube-apiserver to access endpoints of a Kubelet to establish connections to Pods, retrieve container logs, and more. While Kubernetes already validates the proxying address for Nodes, a bug in kube-apiserver made it possible to bypass this validation. Bypassing this validation could allow authenticated requests destined for Nodes to to the API server's private network.","status":"published","published":"2023-03-01T00:00:00Z","modified":"2025-03-07T18:34:22.358Z","cvss":[{"version":"3.1","score":6.6,"vector":"CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H","level":"medium","assessor":"cna"}],"cwes":["CWE-20"],"updated_at":"2026-11-02T14:34:33.24035Z"}],"euvd":[{"id":"EUVD-2023-1049","description":"Users may have access to secure endpoints in the control plane network. Kubernetes clusters are only affected if an untrusted user can modify Node objects and send proxy requests to them. Kubernetes supports node proxying, which allows clients of kube-apiserver to access endpoints of a Kubelet to establish connections to Pods, retrieve container logs, and more. While Kubernetes already validates the proxying address for Nodes, a bug in kube-apiserver made it possible to bypass this validation. Bypassing this validation could allow authenticated requests destined for Nodes to to the API server's private network.","status":"published","published":"2023-03-01T00:00:00Z","modified":"2025-03-07T18:34:22Z","cvss":[{"version":"3.1","score":6.6,"vector":"CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H","level":"medium"}],"updated_at":"2026-11-02T20:53:10.22972Z"}],"ghsa":[{"id":"GHSA-jh36-q97c-9928","title":"Kubernetes vulnerable to validation bypass","description":"Users may have access to secure endpoints in the control plane network. Kubernetes clusters are only affected if an untrusted user can modify Node objects and send proxy requests to them. Kubernetes supports node proxying, which allows clients of kube-apiserver to access endpoints of a Kubelet to establish connections to Pods, retrieve container logs, and more. While Kubernetes already validates the proxying address for Nodes, a bug in kube-apiserver made it possible to bypass this validation. Bypassing this validation could allow authenticated requests destined for Nodes to to the API server's private network.","status":"published","published":"2023-03-01T21:30:18Z","modified":"2023-05-05T21:40:20Z","cvss":[{"version":"3.1","score":8.8,"vector":"CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H","level":"high"}],"cwes":["CWE-20"],"updated_at":"2026-11-02T14:36:52.310293Z"}],"nvd":[{"id":"CVE-2022-3294","description":"Users may have access to secure endpoints in the control plane network. Kubernetes clusters are only affected if an untrusted user can modify Node objects and send proxy requests to them. Kubernetes supports node proxying, which allows clients of kube-apiserver to access endpoints of a Kubelet to establish connections to Pods, retrieve container logs, and more. While Kubernetes already validates the proxying address for Nodes, a bug in kube-apiserver made it possible to bypass this validation. Bypassing this validation could allow authenticated requests destined for Nodes to to the API server's private network.","status":"published","published":"2023-03-01T19:15:25.57Z","modified":"2026-06-17T04:59:14.747Z","cvss":[{"version":"3.1","score":6.6,"vector":"CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H","level":"medium","assessor":"secondary"},{"version":"3.1","score":8.8,"vector":"CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H","level":"high","assessor":"primary"}],"cwes":["CWE-20"],"updated_at":"2026-11-02T14:07:36.601381Z"}],"osv":[{"id":"CVE-2022-3294","title":"Node address isn't always verified when proxying","description":"Users may have access to secure endpoints in the control plane network. Kubernetes clusters are only affected if an untrusted user can modify Node objects and send proxy requests to them. Kubernetes supports node proxying, which allows clients of kube-apiserver to access endpoints of a Kubelet to establish connections to Pods, retrieve container logs, and more. While Kubernetes already validates the proxying address for Nodes, a bug in kube-apiserver made it possible to bypass this validation. Bypassing this validation could allow authenticated requests destined for Nodes to to the API server's private network.","status":"published","published":"2023-03-01T00:00:00Z","modified":"2026-10-28T02:30:55.596260661Z","cvss":[{"version":"3.1","score":6.6,"vector":"CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H","level":"medium"}],"cwes":["CWE-20"],"updated_at":"2026-11-02T15:44:25.860945Z"},{"id":"DEBIAN-CVE-2022-3294","description":"Users may have access to secure endpoints in the control plane network. Kubernetes clusters are only affected if an untrusted user can modify Node objects and send proxy requests to them. Kubernetes supports node proxying, which allows clients of kube-apiserver to access endpoints of a Kubelet to establish connections to Pods, retrieve container logs, and more. While Kubernetes already validates the proxying address for Nodes, a bug in kube-apiserver made it possible to bypass this validation. Bypassing this validation could allow authenticated requests destined for Nodes to to the API server's private network.","status":"published","published":"2023-03-01T19:15:25.57Z","modified":"2026-11-03T08:01:21.817164069Z","cvss":[{"version":"3.1","score":8.8,"vector":"CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H","level":"high"}],"updated_at":"2026-11-03T08:25:01.007408Z"},{"id":"GHSA-jh36-q97c-9928","title":"Kubernetes vulnerable to validation bypass","description":"Users may have access to secure endpoints in the control plane network. Kubernetes clusters are only affected if an untrusted user can modify Node objects and send proxy requests to them. Kubernetes supports node proxying, which allows clients of kube-apiserver to access endpoints of a Kubelet to establish connections to Pods, retrieve container logs, and more. While Kubernetes already validates the proxying address for Nodes, a bug in kube-apiserver made it possible to bypass this validation. Bypassing this validation could allow authenticated requests destined for Nodes to to the API server's private network.","status":"published","published":"2023-03-01T21:30:18Z","modified":"2024-08-20T20:58:32.682867Z","cvss":[{"version":"3.1","score":8.8,"vector":"CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H","level":"high"}],"cwes":["CWE-20"],"updated_at":"2026-11-02T15:46:50.336262Z"},{"id":"OESA-2023-1413","title":"kubernetes security update","description":"Container cluster management.\n\nSecurity Fix(es):\n\nUsers authorized to list or watch one type of namespaced custom resource cluster-wide can read custom resources of a different type in the same API group without authorization. Clusters are impacted by this vulnerability if all of the following are true: 1. There are 2+ CustomResourceDefinitions sharing the same API group 2. Users have cluster-wide list or watch authorization on one of those custom resources. 3. The same users are not authorized to read another custom resource in the same API group.(CVE-2022-3162)\n\nUsers may have access to secure endpoints in the control plane network. Kubernetes clusters are only affected if an untrusted user can modify Node objects and send proxy requests to them. Kubernetes supports node proxying, which allows clients of kube-apiserver to access endpoints of a Kubelet to establish connections to Pods, retrieve container logs, and more. While Kubernetes already validates the proxying address for Nodes, a bug in kube-apiserver made it possible to bypass this validation. Bypassing this validation could allow authenticated requests destined for Nodes to to the API server\u0026apos;s private network.(CVE-2022-3294)\n\nA security issue was discovered in Kubelet that allows pods to bypass the seccomp profile enforcement. Pods that use localhost type for seccomp profile but specify an empty profile field, are affected by this issue. In this scenario, this vulnerability allows the pod to run in unconfined (seccomp disabled) mode. This bug affects Kubelet.(CVE-2023-2431)\n\nUsers may be able to launch containers using images that are restricted by ImagePolicyWebhook when using ephemeral containers. Kubernetes clusters are only affected if the ImagePolicyWebhook admission plugin is used together with ephemeral containers.\n\n(CVE-2023-2727)\n\nUsers may be able to launch containers that bypass the mountable secrets policy enforced by the ServiceAccount admission plugin when using ephemeral containers. The policy ensures pods running with a service account may only reference secrets specified in the service account’s secrets field. Kubernetes clusters are only affected if the ServiceAccount admission plugin and the `kubernetes.io/enforce-mountable-secrets` annotation are used together with ephemeral containers.\n\n(CVE-2023-2728)","status":"published","published":"2023-07-08T11:05:52Z","modified":"2026-08-18T01:16:42.685184191Z","cvss":[{"version":"3.1","score":8.8,"vector":"CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H","level":"high"}],"updated_at":"2026-11-02T15:52:40.328856Z"},{"id":"OESA-2023-1414","title":"kubernetes security update","description":"Container cluster management.\n\nSecurity Fix(es):\n\nUsers authorized to list or watch one type of namespaced custom resource cluster-wide can read custom resources of a different type in the same API group without authorization. Clusters are impacted by this vulnerability if all of the following are true: 1. There are 2+ CustomResourceDefinitions sharing the same API group 2. Users have cluster-wide list or watch authorization on one of those custom resources. 3. The same users are not authorized to read another custom resource in the same API group.(CVE-2022-3162)\n\nUsers may have access to secure endpoints in the control plane network. Kubernetes clusters are only affected if an untrusted user can modify Node objects and send proxy requests to them. Kubernetes supports node proxying, which allows clients of kube-apiserver to access endpoints of a Kubelet to establish connections to Pods, retrieve container logs, and more. While Kubernetes already validates the proxying address for Nodes, a bug in kube-apiserver made it possible to bypass this validation. Bypassing this validation could allow authenticated requests destined for Nodes to to the API server\u0026apos;s private network.(CVE-2022-3294)\n\nA security issue was discovered in Kubelet that allows pods to bypass the seccomp profile enforcement. Pods that use localhost type for seccomp profile but specify an empty profile field, are affected by this issue. In this scenario, this vulnerability allows the pod to run in unconfined (seccomp disabled) mode. This bug affects Kubelet.(CVE-2023-2431)\n\nUsers may be able to launch containers using images that are restricted by ImagePolicyWebhook when using ephemeral containers. Kubernetes clusters are only affected if the ImagePolicyWebhook admission plugin is used together with ephemeral containers.\n\n(CVE-2023-2727)\n\nUsers may be able to launch containers that bypass the mountable secrets policy enforced by the ServiceAccount admission plugin when using ephemeral containers. The policy ensures pods running with a service account may only reference secrets specified in the service account’s secrets field. Kubernetes clusters are only affected if the ServiceAccount admission plugin and the `kubernetes.io/enforce-mountable-secrets` annotation are used together with ephemeral containers.\n\n(CVE-2023-2728)","status":"published","published":"2023-07-08T11:05:52Z","modified":"2026-08-18T01:17:45.510101367Z","cvss":[{"version":"3.1","score":8.8,"vector":"CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H","level":"high"}],"updated_at":"2026-11-02T15:52:40.328856Z"},{"id":"OESA-2023-1415","title":"kubernetes security update","description":"Container cluster management.\n\nSecurity Fix(es):\n\nUsers authorized to list or watch one type of namespaced custom resource cluster-wide can read custom resources of a different type in the same API group without authorization. Clusters are impacted by this vulnerability if all of the following are true: 1. There are 2+ CustomResourceDefinitions sharing the same API group 2. Users have cluster-wide list or watch authorization on one of those custom resources. 3. The same users are not authorized to read another custom resource in the same API group.(CVE-2022-3162)\n\nUsers may have access to secure endpoints in the control plane network. Kubernetes clusters are only affected if an untrusted user can modify Node objects and send proxy requests to them. Kubernetes supports node proxying, which allows clients of kube-apiserver to access endpoints of a Kubelet to establish connections to Pods, retrieve container logs, and more. While Kubernetes already validates the proxying address for Nodes, a bug in kube-apiserver made it possible to bypass this validation. Bypassing this validation could allow authenticated requests destined for Nodes to to the API server\u0026apos;s private network.(CVE-2022-3294)\n\nA security issue was discovered in Kubelet that allows pods to bypass the seccomp profile enforcement. Pods that use localhost type for seccomp profile but specify an empty profile field, are affected by this issue. In this scenario, this vulnerability allows the pod to run in unconfined (seccomp disabled) mode. This bug affects Kubelet.(CVE-2023-2431)\n\nUsers may be able to launch containers using images that are restricted by ImagePolicyWebhook when using ephemeral containers. Kubernetes clusters are only affected if the ImagePolicyWebhook admission plugin is used together with ephemeral containers.\n\n(CVE-2023-2727)\n\nUsers may be able to launch containers that bypass the mountable secrets policy enforced by the ServiceAccount admission plugin when using ephemeral containers. The policy ensures pods running with a service account may only reference secrets specified in the service account’s secrets field. Kubernetes clusters are only affected if the ServiceAccount admission plugin and the `kubernetes.io/enforce-mountable-secrets` annotation are used together with ephemeral containers.\n\n(CVE-2023-2728)","status":"published","published":"2023-07-08T11:05:52Z","modified":"2026-08-18T01:17:45.535525862Z","cvss":[{"version":"3.1","score":8.8,"vector":"CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H","level":"high"}],"updated_at":"2026-11-02T15:52:40.328856Z"},{"id":"OESA-2023-1416","title":"kubernetes security update","description":"Container cluster management.\n\nSecurity Fix(es):\n\nUsers authorized to list or watch one type of namespaced custom resource cluster-wide can read custom resources of a different type in the same API group without authorization. Clusters are impacted by this vulnerability if all of the following are true: 1. There are 2+ CustomResourceDefinitions sharing the same API group 2. Users have cluster-wide list or watch authorization on one of those custom resources. 3. The same users are not authorized to read another custom resource in the same API group.(CVE-2022-3162)\n\nUsers may have access to secure endpoints in the control plane network. Kubernetes clusters are only affected if an untrusted user can modify Node objects and send proxy requests to them. Kubernetes supports node proxying, which allows clients of kube-apiserver to access endpoints of a Kubelet to establish connections to Pods, retrieve container logs, and more. While Kubernetes already validates the proxying address for Nodes, a bug in kube-apiserver made it possible to bypass this validation. Bypassing this validation could allow authenticated requests destined for Nodes to to the API server\u0026apos;s private network.(CVE-2022-3294)\n\nA security issue was discovered in Kubelet that allows pods to bypass the seccomp profile enforcement. Pods that use localhost type for seccomp profile but specify an empty profile field, are affected by this issue. In this scenario, this vulnerability allows the pod to run in unconfined (seccomp disabled) mode. This bug affects Kubelet.(CVE-2023-2431)\n\nUsers may be able to launch containers using images that are restricted by ImagePolicyWebhook when using ephemeral containers. Kubernetes clusters are only affected if the ImagePolicyWebhook admission plugin is used together with ephemeral containers.\n\n(CVE-2023-2727)\n\nUsers may be able to launch containers that bypass the mountable secrets policy enforced by the ServiceAccount admission plugin when using ephemeral containers. The policy ensures pods running with a service account may only reference secrets specified in the service account’s secrets field. Kubernetes clusters are only affected if the ServiceAccount admission plugin and the `kubernetes.io/enforce-mountable-secrets` annotation are used together with ephemeral containers.\n\n(CVE-2023-2728)","status":"published","published":"2023-07-08T11:05:52Z","modified":"2026-08-18T01:17:45.540646447Z","cvss":[{"version":"3.1","score":8.8,"vector":"CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H","level":"high"}],"updated_at":"2026-11-02T15:52:40.328856Z"},{"id":"RHBA-2023:0452","title":"Red Hat Bug Fix Advisory: rpm","status":"published","published":"2024-09-16T10:33:23Z","modified":"2026-08-14T10:02:07Z","cvss":[{"version":"3.1","score":8.8,"vector":"CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H","level":"high"}],"updated_at":"2026-11-02T15:52:58.636919Z"},{"id":"UBUNTU-CVE-2022-3294","description":"Users may have access to secure endpoints in the control plane network. Kubernetes clusters are only affected if an untrusted user can modify Node objects and send proxy requests to them. Kubernetes supports node proxying, which allows clients of kube-apiserver to access endpoints of a Kubelet to establish connections to Pods, retrieve container logs, and more. While Kubernetes already validates the proxying address for Nodes, a bug in kube-apiserver made it possible to bypass this validation. Bypassing this validation could allow authenticated requests destined for Nodes to to the API server's private network.","status":"withdrawn","published":"2023-03-01T19:15:00Z","modified":"2025-07-14T06:35:01.133667Z","cvss":[{"version":"3.1","score":6.6,"vector":"CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H","level":"medium"},{"version":"3.1","score":8.8,"vector":"CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H","level":"high"}],"updated_at":"2026-11-02T16:53:54.697021Z"},{"id":"GO-2023-1629","title":"Kubernetes vulnerable to validation bypass in k8s.io/kubernetes","description":"Kubernetes vulnerable to validation bypass in k8s.io/kubernetes","status":"published","published":"2024-08-20T20:29:14Z","modified":"2026-03-03T04:51:23.905801Z","updated_at":"2026-11-02T15:47:01.185262Z"},{"id":"openSUSE-SU-2024:12737-1","title":"kubernetes1.22-apiserver-1.22.17-1.1 on GA media","description":"These are all security issues fixed in the kubernetes1.22-apiserver-1.22.17-1.1 package on the GA media of openSUSE Tumbleweed.","status":"published","published":"2024-06-15T00:00:00Z","modified":"2026-02-04T02:43:56.843642Z","updated_at":"2026-11-02T16:58:35.751245Z"},{"id":"openSUSE-SU-2024:12780-1","title":"kubernetes1.23-apiserver-1.23.17-1.1 on GA media","description":"These are all security issues fixed in the kubernetes1.23-apiserver-1.23.17-1.1 package on the GA media of openSUSE Tumbleweed.","status":"published","published":"2024-06-15T00:00:00Z","modified":"2026-02-04T04:03:25.943867Z","updated_at":"2026-11-02T16:58:35.751245Z"},{"id":"openSUSE-SU-2024:12781-1","title":"kubernetes1.24-apiserver-1.24.11-1.1 on GA media","description":"These are all security issues fixed in the kubernetes1.24-apiserver-1.24.11-1.1 package on the GA media of openSUSE Tumbleweed.","status":"published","published":"2024-06-15T00:00:00Z","modified":"2026-02-04T02:53:24.9242Z","updated_at":"2026-11-02T16:58:35.751245Z"},{"id":"openSUSE-SU-2024:12810-1","title":"kubernetes1.25-apiserver-1.25.7-1.1 on GA media","description":"These are all security issues fixed in the kubernetes1.25-apiserver-1.25.7-1.1 package on the GA media of openSUSE Tumbleweed.","status":"published","published":"2024-06-15T00:00:00Z","modified":"2026-02-04T03:26:48.801815Z","updated_at":"2026-11-02T16:58:35.751245Z"},{"id":"openSUSE-SU-2025:15424-1","title":"govulncheck-vulndb-0.0.20250807T150727-1.1 on GA media","description":"These are all security issues fixed in the govulncheck-vulndb-0.0.20250807T150727-1.1 package on the GA media of openSUSE Tumbleweed.","status":"published","published":"2025-08-08T00:00:00Z","modified":"2026-03-23T04:53:45.821911Z","updated_at":"2026-11-02T16:58:37.810934Z"},{"id":"SUSE-SU-2023:2292-1","title":"Security update for kubernetes1.23","description":"This update for kubernetes1.23 fixes the following issues:\n\n- add kubernetes1.18-client-common as conflicts with kubernetes-client-bash-completion \n\n- Split individual completions into separate packages\n\nUpdate to version 1.23.17:\n\n  * releng: Update images, dependencies and version to Go 1.19.6\n  * Update golang.org/x/net to v0.7.0\n  * Pin golang.org/x/net to v0.4.0\n  * add scale test for probes\n  * use custom dialer for http probes\n  * use custom dialer for tcp probes\n  * add custom dialer optimized for probes\n  * egress_selector: prevent goroutines leak on connect() step.\n  * tls.Dial() validates hostname, no need to do that manually\n  * Fix issue that Audit Server could not correctly encode DeleteOption\n  * Do not include scheduler name in the preemption event message\n  * Do not leak cross namespace pod metadata in preemption events\n  * pkg/controller/job: re-honor exponential backoff\n  * releng: Update images, dependencies and version to Go 1.19.5\n  * Bump Konnectivity to v0.0.35\n  * Improve vendor verification works for each staging repo\n  * Update to go1.19\n  * Adjust for os/exec changes in 1.19\n  * Update golangci-lint to 1.46.2 and fix errors\n  * Match go1.17 defaults for SHA-1 and GC\n  * update golangci-lint to 1.45.0\n  * kubelet: make the image pull time more accurate in event\n  * change k8s.gcr.io/pause to registry.k8s.io/pause\n  * use etcd 3.5.6-0 after promotion\n  * changelog: CVE-2022-3294 and CVE-2022-3162 were fixed in v1.23.14\n  * Add CVE-2021-25749 to CHANGELOG-1.23.md\n  * Add CVE-2022-3294 to CHANGELOG-1.23.md\n  * kubeadm: use registry.k8s.io instead of k8s.gcr.io\n  * etcd: Updated to v3.5.5\n  * Bump konnectivity network proxy to v0.0.33. Includes a couple bug fixes for better handling of dial failures. [Agent \u0026 Server](https://github.com/kubernetes-sigs/apiserver-network-proxy/commits/v0.0.33) include numerous other fixes.\n  * kubeadm: allow RSA and ECDSA format keys in preflight check\n  * Fixes kubelet log compression on Windows\n  * Reduce default gzip compression level from 4 to 1 in apiserver\n  * exec auth: support TLS config caching\n  * Marshal MicroTime to json and proto at the same precision\n  * Windows: ensure runAsNonRoot does case-insensitive comparison on user name\n  * update structured-merge-diff to 4.2.3\n  * Add rate limiting when calling STS assume role API\n  * Fixing issue in generatePodSandboxWindowsConfig for hostProcess containers by where pod sandbox won't have HostProcess bit set if pod does not have a security context but containers specify HostProcess.\n","status":"published","published":"2023-05-25T07:21:44Z","modified":"2025-05-02T04:31:15.424968Z","updated_at":"2026-11-02T15:53:53.019382Z"}]}}