{"id":"CVE-2023-0465","aliases":["ALPINE-CVE-2023-0465","ALSA-2023:3722","AZL-25937","AZL-27241","AZL-31145","AZL-34663","AZL-37716","BELL-CVE-2023-0465","DEBIAN-CVE-2023-0465","DLA-3449-1","DSA-5417-1","EUVD-2023-12519","GHSA-77f3-6546-6rj7","JLSEC-2026-236","MGASA-2023-0130","OESA-2023-1207","OESA-2024-1134","OESA-2024-1135","OESA-2024-1136","OESA-2024-1137","OESA-2024-1138","OESA-2024-1168","OESA-2024-1222","OESA-2024-1223","OESA-2024-1224","OESA-2024-1225","OESA-2024-1226","OESA-2024-1227","OESA-2024-1238","RHSA-2023:3722","RHSA-2023:7622","RHSA-2023:7625","SUSE-SU-2023:1790-1","SUSE-SU-2023:1794-1","SUSE-SU-2023:1898-1","SUSE-SU-2023:1907-1","SUSE-SU-2023:1908-1","SUSE-SU-2023:1911-1","SUSE-SU-2023:1912-1","SUSE-SU-2023:1914-1","SUSE-SU-2023:1922-1","SUSE-SU-2023:1926-1","SUSE-SU-2023:1960-1","UBUNTU-CVE-2023-0465","USN-7894-1","openSUSE-SU-2024:12837-1","openSUSE-SU-2024:12842-1","openSUSE-SU-2024:12969-1"],"status":"published","title":"Invalid certificate policies in leaf certificates are silently ignored","description":"Applications that use a non-default option when verifying certificates may be\nvulnerable to an attack from a malicious CA to circumvent certain checks.\n\nInvalid certificate policies in leaf certificates are silently ignored by\nOpenSSL and other certificate policy checks are skipped for that certificate.\nA malicious CA could use this to deliberately assert invalid certificate policies\nin order to circumvent policy checking on the certificate altogether.\n\nPolicy processing is disabled by default but can be enabled by passing\nthe `-policy' argument to the command line utilities or by calling the\n`X509_VERIFY_PARAM_set1_policies()' function.","severity":{"version":"3.1","score":5.3,"vector":"CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N","level":"medium","assessor":"primary","from":"nvd"},"epss":{"day":"2026-11-10","score":0.01772,"percentile":0.78335,"model":"v2026.06.15"},"facts":{"in_kev":false,"known_exploited":false,"public_exploit":false,"fix_available":true},"cwes":["CWE-295"],"published":"2023-03-28T14:30:39Z","modified":"2026-11-03T06:32:39Z","fixes":[{"ecosystem":"Alpine:v3.14","package":"openssl","fixed_in":["1.1.1t-r2"],"sources":["osv"]},{"ecosystem":"Alpine:v3.15","package":"openssl","fixed_in":["1.1.1t-r2"],"sources":["osv"]},{"ecosystem":"Alpine:v3.16","package":"openssl","fixed_in":["1.1.1t-r2"],"sources":["osv"]},{"ecosystem":"Alpine:v3.17","package":"openssl","fixed_in":["3.0.8-r2"],"sources":["osv"]},{"ecosystem":"Alpine:v3.18","package":"openssl","fixed_in":["3.1.0-r2"],"sources":["osv"]},{"ecosystem":"Alpine:v3.19","package":"openssl","fixed_in":["3.1.0-r2"],"sources":["osv"]},{"ecosystem":"Alpine:v3.20","package":"openssl","fixed_in":["3.1.0-r2"],"sources":["osv"]},{"ecosystem":"Alpine:v3.21","package":"openssl","fixed_in":["3.1.0-r2"],"sources":["osv"]},{"ecosystem":"Alpine:v3.22","package":"openssl","fixed_in":["3.1.0-r2"],"sources":["osv"]},{"ecosystem":"Alpine:v3.23","package":"openssl","fixed_in":["3.1.0-r2"],"sources":["osv"]},{"ecosystem":"Alpine:v3.24","package":"openssl","fixed_in":["3.1.0-r2"],"sources":["osv"]},{"ecosystem":"Alpine:v3.17","package":"openssl1.1-compat","fixed_in":["1.1.1t-r2"],"sources":["osv"]},{"ecosystem":"Alpine:v3.18","package":"openssl1.1-compat","fixed_in":["1.1.1t-r2"],"sources":["osv"]},{"ecosystem":"Alpine:v3.15","package":"openssl3","fixed_in":["3.0.8-r2"],"sources":["osv"]},{"ecosystem":"Alpine:v3.16","package":"openssl3","fixed_in":["3.0.8-r2"],"sources":["osv"]},{"ecosystem":"Azure Linux:2","package":"openssl","fixed_in":["1.1.1k-23"],"sources":["osv"]},{"ecosystem":"Azure Linux:2","package":"kata-containers-cc","fixed_in":["0.4.1-2"],"sources":["osv"]},{"ecosystem":"Azure Linux:2","package":"edk2","fixed_in":["20230301gitf80f052277c8-37"],"sources":["osv"]},{"ecosystem":"Azure Linux:3","package":"edk2","fixed_in":["20230301gitf80f052277c8-37"],"sources":["osv"]},{"ecosystem":"Azure Linux:2","package":"hvloader","fixed_in":["1.0.1-9"],"sources":["osv"]},{"ecosystem":"Debian:12","package":"openssl","fixed_in":["3.0.9-1"],"sources":["osv"]},{"ecosystem":"Debian:13","package":"openssl","fixed_in":["3.0.9-1"],"sources":["osv"]},{"ecosystem":"Debian:14","package":"openssl","fixed_in":["3.0.9-1"],"sources":["osv"]},{"ecosystem":"Julia","package":"OpenSSL_jll","fixed_in":["1.1.21+0","3.0.9+0"],"sources":["osv"]},{"ecosystem":"Julia","package":"Openresty_jll","fixed_in":["1.27.1+0"],"sources":["osv"]},{"ecosystem":"SUSE:Linux Enterprise Module for Legacy 12","package":"compat-openssl098","fixed_in":["0.9.8j-106.48.1"],"sources":["osv"]},{"ecosystem":"SUSE:Linux Enterprise Server for SAP Applications 12 SP4","package":"compat-openssl098","fixed_in":["0.9.8j-106.48.1"],"sources":["osv"]},{"ecosystem":"SUSE:Linux Enterprise Server for SAP Applications 12 SP5","package":"compat-openssl098","fixed_in":["0.9.8j-106.48.1"],"sources":["osv"]},{"ecosystem":"SUSE:Linux Enterprise Server 11 SP4 LTSS EXTREME CORE","package":"openssl","fixed_in":["0.9.8j-0.106.66.1"],"sources":["osv"]},{"ecosystem":"Ubuntu:Pro:14.04:LTS","package":"openssl","fixed_in":["1.0.1f-1ubuntu2.27+esm7"],"sources":["osv"]},{"ecosystem":"Ubuntu:Pro:16.04:LTS","package":"openssl","fixed_in":["1.0.2g-1ubuntu4.20+esm7"],"sources":["osv"]},{"ecosystem":"Ubuntu:Pro:FIPS-updates:16.04:LTS","package":"openssl","fixed_in":["1.0.2g-1ubuntu4.fips.4.20.7"],"sources":["osv"]},{"ecosystem":"Ubuntu:18.04:LTS","package":"openssl","fixed_in":["1.1.1-1ubuntu2.1~18.04.22"],"sources":["osv"]},{"ecosystem":"Ubuntu:18.04:LTS","package":"openssl1.0","fixed_in":["1.0.2n-1ubuntu5.12"],"sources":["osv"]},{"ecosystem":"Ubuntu:Pro:FIPS-updates:18.04:LTS","package":"openssl","fixed_in":["1.1.1-1ubuntu2.fips.2.1~18.04.22"],"sources":["osv"]},{"ecosystem":"Ubuntu:20.04:LTS","package":"openssl","fixed_in":["1.1.1f-1ubuntu2.18"],"sources":["osv"]},{"ecosystem":"Ubuntu:Pro:FIPS-updates:20.04:LTS","package":"openssl","fixed_in":["1.1.1f-1ubuntu2.fips.18"],"sources":["osv"]},{"ecosystem":"Ubuntu:22.04:LTS","package":"edk2","fixed_in":["2022.02-3ubuntu0.22.04.4"],"sources":["osv"]},{"ecosystem":"Ubuntu:22.04:LTS","package":"openssl","fixed_in":["3.0.2-0ubuntu1.9"],"sources":["osv"]}],"affected":[{"source":"osv","ecosystem":"Alpine:v3.14","package":"openssl","ranges":[{"type":"ECOSYSTEM","events":[{"introduced":"1.0.2"},{"fixed":"1.1.1t-r2"}]}]},{"source":"osv","ecosystem":"Alpine:v3.15","package":"openssl","ranges":[{"type":"ECOSYSTEM","events":[{"introduced":"1.0.2"},{"fixed":"1.1.1t-r2"}]}]},{"source":"osv","ecosystem":"Alpine:v3.16","package":"openssl","ranges":[{"type":"ECOSYSTEM","events":[{"introduced":"1.0.2"},{"fixed":"1.1.1t-r2"}]}]},{"source":"osv","ecosystem":"Alpine:v3.17","package":"openssl","ranges":[{"type":"ECOSYSTEM","events":[{"introduced":"1.0.2"},{"fixed":"3.0.8-r2"}]}]},{"source":"osv","ecosystem":"Alpine:v3.18","package":"openssl","ranges":[{"type":"ECOSYSTEM","events":[{"introduced":"1.0.2"},{"fixed":"3.1.0-r2"}]}]},{"source":"osv","ecosystem":"Alpine:v3.19","package":"openssl","ranges":[{"type":"ECOSYSTEM","events":[{"introduced":"1.0.2"},{"fixed":"3.1.0-r2"}]}]},{"source":"osv","ecosystem":"Alpine:v3.20","package":"openssl","ranges":[{"type":"ECOSYSTEM","events":[{"introduced":"1.0.2"},{"fixed":"3.1.0-r2"}]}]},{"source":"osv","ecosystem":"Alpine:v3.21","package":"openssl","ranges":[{"type":"ECOSYSTEM","events":[{"introduced":"1.0.2"},{"fixed":"3.1.0-r2"}]}]},{"source":"osv","ecosystem":"Alpine:v3.22","package":"openssl","ranges":[{"type":"ECOSYSTEM","events":[{"introduced":"1.0.2"},{"fixed":"3.1.0-r2"}]}]},{"source":"osv","ecosystem":"Alpine:v3.23","package":"openssl","ranges":[{"type":"ECOSYSTEM","events":[{"introduced":"1.0.2"},{"fixed":"3.1.0-r2"}]}]},{"source":"osv","ecosystem":"Alpine:v3.24","package":"openssl","ranges":[{"type":"ECOSYSTEM","events":[{"introduced":"1.0.2"},{"fixed":"3.1.0-r2"}]}]},{"source":"osv","ecosystem":"Alpine:v3.17","package":"openssl1.1-compat","ranges":[{"type":"ECOSYSTEM","events":[{"introduced":"0"},{"fixed":"1.1.1t-r2"}]}]},{"source":"osv","ecosystem":"Alpine:v3.18","package":"openssl1.1-compat","ranges":[{"type":"ECOSYSTEM","events":[{"introduced":"0"},{"fixed":"1.1.1t-r2"}]}]},{"source":"osv","ecosystem":"Alpine:v3.15","package":"openssl3","ranges":[{"type":"ECOSYSTEM","events":[{"introduced":"0"},{"fixed":"3.0.8-r2"}]}]},{"source":"osv","ecosystem":"Alpine:v3.16","package":"openssl3","ranges":[{"type":"ECOSYSTEM","events":[{"introduced":"0"},{"fixed":"3.0.8-r2"}]}]},{"source":"osv","ecosystem":"AlmaLinux:9","package":"openssl","ranges":[{"type":"ECOSYSTEM","events":[{"introduced":"0"},{"fixed":"1:3.0.7-16.el9_2"}]}],"bundled":5},{"source":"osv","ecosystem":"AlmaLinux:9","package":"openssl-devel","ranges":[{"type":"ECOSYSTEM","events":[{"introduced":"0"},{"fixed":"1:3.0.7-16.el9_2"}]}],"bundled":5},{"source":"osv","ecosystem":"AlmaLinux:9","package":"openssl-libs","ranges":[{"type":"ECOSYSTEM","events":[{"introduced":"0"},{"fixed":"1:3.0.7-16.el9_2"}]}],"bundled":5},{"source":"osv","ecosystem":"AlmaLinux:9","package":"openssl-perl","ranges":[{"type":"ECOSYSTEM","events":[{"introduced":"0"},{"fixed":"1:3.0.7-16.el9_2"}]}],"bundled":5},{"source":"osv","ecosystem":"Azure Linux:2","package":"openssl","ranges":[{"type":"ECOSYSTEM","events":[{"introduced":"0"},{"fixed":"1.1.1k-23"}]}]},{"source":"osv","ecosystem":"Azure Linux:2","package":"kata-containers-cc","ranges":[{"type":"ECOSYSTEM","events":[{"introduced":"0"},{"fixed":"0.4.1-2"}]}]},{"source":"osv","ecosystem":"Azure Linux:2","package":"edk2","ranges":[{"type":"ECOSYSTEM","events":[{"introduced":"0"},{"fixed":"20230301gitf80f052277c8-37"}]}]},{"source":"osv","ecosystem":"Azure Linux:3","package":"edk2","ranges":[{"type":"ECOSYSTEM","events":[{"introduced":"0"},{"fixed":"20230301gitf80f052277c8-37"}]}]},{"source":"osv","ecosystem":"Azure Linux:2","package":"hvloader","ranges":[{"type":"ECOSYSTEM","events":[{"introduced":"0"},{"fixed":"1.0.1-9"}]}]},{"source":"osv","ecosystem":"Debian:12","package":"openssl","ranges":[{"type":"ECOSYSTEM","events":[{"introduced":"0"},{"fixed":"3.0.9-1"}]}]},{"source":"osv","ecosystem":"Debian:13","package":"openssl","ranges":[{"type":"ECOSYSTEM","events":[{"introduced":"0"},{"fixed":"3.0.9-1"}]}]},{"source":"osv","ecosystem":"Debian:14","package":"openssl","ranges":[{"type":"ECOSYSTEM","events":[{"introduced":"0"},{"fixed":"3.0.9-1"}]}]},{"source":"osv","ecosystem":"Debian:10","package":"openssl","ranges":[{"type":"ECOSYSTEM","events":[{"introduced":"0"},{"fixed":"1.1.1n-0+deb10u5"}]}],"versions":["1.1.1c-1","1.1.1d-0+deb10u1","1.1.1d-0+deb10u2","1.1.1d-0+deb10u3","1.1.1d-0+deb10u4","1.1.1d-0+deb10u5","1.1.1d-0+deb10u6","1.1.1d-0+deb10u7","1.1.1d-0+deb10u8","1.1.1d-1","1.1.1d-2","1.1.1e-1","1.1.1f-1","1.1.1g-1","1.1.1h-1","1.1.1i-1","1.1.1i-2","1.1.1i-3","1.1.1j-1","1.1.1k-1","1.1.1l-1","1.1.1m-1","1.1.1n-0+deb10u1","1.1.1n-0+deb10u2","1.1.1n-0+deb10u3","1.1.1n-0+deb10u4"],"bundled":4},{"source":"osv","ecosystem":"Debian:11","package":"openssl","ranges":[{"type":"ECOSYSTEM","events":[{"introduced":"0"},{"fixed":"1.1.1n-0+deb11u5"}]}],"versions":["1.1.1k-1","1.1.1k-1+deb11u1","1.1.1k-1+deb11u2","1.1.1l-1","1.1.1m-0+deb11u1","1.1.1m-1","1.1.1n-0+deb11u1","1.1.1n-0+deb11u2","1.1.1n-0+deb11u3","1.1.1n-0+deb11u4"],"bundled":4},{"source":"osv","ecosystem":"Julia","package":"OpenSSL_jll","ranges":[{"type":"SEMVER","events":[{"introduced":"0"},{"fixed":"1.1.21+0"},{"introduced":"3.0.8+0"},{"fixed":"3.0.9+0"}]}]},{"source":"osv","ecosystem":"Julia","package":"Openresty_jll","ranges":[{"type":"SEMVER","events":[{"introduced":"0"},{"fixed":"1.27.1+0"}]}]},{"source":"osv","ecosystem":"Mageia:8","package":"openssl","ranges":[{"type":"ECOSYSTEM","events":[{"introduced":"0"},{"fixed":"1.1.1t-1.mga8"}]}],"bundled":11},{"source":"osv","ecosystem":"openEuler:20.03-LTS-SP1","package":"openssl","ranges":[{"type":"ECOSYSTEM","events":[{"introduced":"0"},{"fixed":"1.1.1f-23.oe1"}]}],"bundled":3},{"source":"osv","ecosystem":"openEuler:20.03-LTS-SP3","package":"openssl","ranges":[{"type":"ECOSYSTEM","events":[{"introduced":"0"},{"fixed":"1.1.1f-23.oe1"}]}],"bundled":3},{"source":"osv","ecosystem":"openEuler:22.03-LTS","package":"openssl","ranges":[{"type":"ECOSYSTEM","events":[{"introduced":"0"},{"fixed":"1.1.1m-20.oe2203sp1"}]}],"bundled":3},{"source":"osv","ecosystem":"openEuler:22.03-LTS-SP1","package":"openssl","ranges":[{"type":"ECOSYSTEM","events":[{"introduced":"0"},{"fixed":"1.1.1m-20.oe2203sp1"}]}],"bundled":3},{"source":"osv","ecosystem":"openEuler:20.03-LTS-SP1","package":"nodejs","ranges":[{"type":"ECOSYSTEM","events":[{"introduced":"0"},{"fixed":"12.22.11-7.oe1"}]}],"bundled":2},{"source":"osv","ecosystem":"openEuler:20.03-LTS-SP4","package":"nodejs","ranges":[{"type":"ECOSYSTEM","events":[{"introduced":"0"},{"fixed":"12.22.11-7.oe2003sp4"}]}],"bundled":2},{"source":"osv","ecosystem":"openEuler:22.03-LTS","package":"nodejs","ranges":[{"type":"ECOSYSTEM","events":[{"introduced":"0"},{"fixed":"12.22.11-9.oe2203"}]}],"bundled":2},{"source":"osv","ecosystem":"openEuler:22.03-LTS-SP1","package":"nodejs","ranges":[{"type":"ECOSYSTEM","events":[{"introduced":"0"},{"fixed":"12.22.11-9.oe2203sp1"}]}],"bundled":2},{"source":"osv","ecosystem":"openEuler:22.03-LTS-SP2","package":"nodejs","ranges":[{"type":"ECOSYSTEM","events":[{"introduced":"0"},{"fixed":"12.22.11-9.oe2203sp2"}]}],"bundled":2},{"source":"osv","ecosystem":"openEuler:22.03-LTS-SP3","package":"nodejs","ranges":[{"type":"ECOSYSTEM","events":[{"introduced":"0"},{"fixed":"12.22.11-9.oe2203sp3"}]}],"bundled":3},{"source":"osv","ecosystem":"openEuler:20.03-LTS-SP4","package":"shim","ranges":[{"type":"ECOSYSTEM","events":[{"introduced":"0"},{"fixed":"15-35.oe2003sp4"}]}],"bundled":3},{"source":"osv","ecosystem":"openEuler:22.03-LTS","package":"shim","ranges":[{"type":"ECOSYSTEM","events":[{"introduced":"0"},{"fixed":"15.4-14.oe2203"}]}],"bundled":4},{"source":"osv","ecosystem":"openEuler:22.03-LTS-SP1","package":"shim","ranges":[{"type":"ECOSYSTEM","events":[{"introduced":"0"},{"fixed":"15.6-17.oe2203sp1"}]}],"bundled":4},{"source":"osv","ecosystem":"openEuler:22.03-LTS-SP2","package":"shim","ranges":[{"type":"ECOSYSTEM","events":[{"introduced":"0"},{"fixed":"15.6-18.oe2203sp2"}]}],"bundled":4},{"source":"osv","ecosystem":"openEuler:22.03-LTS-SP3","package":"shim","ranges":[{"type":"ECOSYSTEM","events":[{"introduced":"0"},{"fixed":"15.6-20.oe2203sp3"}]}],"bundled":3},{"source":"osv","ecosystem":"openEuler:20.03-LTS-SP1","package":"shim","ranges":[{"type":"ECOSYSTEM","events":[{"introduced":"0"},{"fixed":"15-29.oe1"}]}],"bundled":3},{"source":"osv","ecosystem":"openEuler:20.03-LTS-SP1","package":"edk2","ranges":[{"type":"ECOSYSTEM","events":[{"introduced":"0"},{"fixed":"202002-18.oe1"}]}],"bundled":6},{"source":"osv","ecosystem":"openEuler:20.03-LTS-SP4","package":"edk2","ranges":[{"type":"ECOSYSTEM","events":[{"introduced":"0"},{"fixed":"202002-18.oe2003sp4"}]}],"bundled":6},{"source":"osv","ecosystem":"openEuler:22.03-LTS","package":"edk2","ranges":[{"type":"ECOSYSTEM","events":[{"introduced":"0"},{"fixed":"202011-14.oe2203sp3"}]}],"bundled":6},{"source":"osv","ecosystem":"openEuler:22.03-LTS-SP1","package":"edk2","ranges":[{"type":"ECOSYSTEM","events":[{"introduced":"0"},{"fixed":"202011-14.oe2203sp1"}]}],"bundled":6},{"source":"osv","ecosystem":"openEuler:22.03-LTS-SP2","package":"edk2","ranges":[{"type":"ECOSYSTEM","events":[{"introduced":"0"},{"fixed":"202011-14.oe2203sp2"}]}],"bundled":6},{"source":"osv","ecosystem":"openEuler:22.03-LTS-SP3","package":"edk2","ranges":[{"type":"ECOSYSTEM","events":[{"introduced":"0"},{"fixed":"202011-14.oe2203sp3"}]}],"bundled":6},{"source":"osv","ecosystem":"Red Hat:enterprise_linux:9::appstream","package":"openssl-debuginfo","ranges":[{"type":"ECOSYSTEM","events":[{"introduced":"0"},{"fixed":"1:3.0.7-16.el9_2"}]}],"bundled":5},{"source":"osv","ecosystem":"Red Hat:enterprise_linux:9::appstream","package":"openssl-debugsource","ranges":[{"type":"ECOSYSTEM","events":[{"introduced":"0"},{"fixed":"1:3.0.7-16.el9_2"}]}],"bundled":5},{"source":"osv","ecosystem":"Red Hat:enterprise_linux:9::appstream","package":"openssl-devel","ranges":[{"type":"ECOSYSTEM","events":[{"introduced":"0"},{"fixed":"1:3.0.7-16.el9_2"}]}],"bundled":5},{"source":"osv","ecosystem":"Red Hat:enterprise_linux:9::appstream","package":"openssl-libs-debuginfo","ranges":[{"type":"ECOSYSTEM","events":[{"introduced":"0"},{"fixed":"1:3.0.7-16.el9_2"}]}],"bundled":5},{"source":"osv","ecosystem":"Red Hat:enterprise_linux:9::appstream","package":"openssl-perl","ranges":[{"type":"ECOSYSTEM","events":[{"introduced":"0"},{"fixed":"1:3.0.7-16.el9_2"}]}],"bundled":5},{"source":"osv","ecosystem":"Red Hat:enterprise_linux:9::baseos","package":"openssl","ranges":[{"type":"ECOSYSTEM","events":[{"introduced":"0"},{"fixed":"1:3.0.7-16.el9_2"}]}],"bundled":5},{"source":"osv","ecosystem":"Red Hat:enterprise_linux:9::baseos","package":"openssl-debuginfo","ranges":[{"type":"ECOSYSTEM","events":[{"introduced":"0"},{"fixed":"1:3.0.7-16.el9_2"}]}],"bundled":5},{"source":"osv","ecosystem":"Red Hat:enterprise_linux:9::baseos","package":"openssl-debugsource","ranges":[{"type":"ECOSYSTEM","events":[{"introduced":"0"},{"fixed":"1:3.0.7-16.el9_2"}]}],"bundled":5},{"source":"osv","ecosystem":"Red Hat:enterprise_linux:9::baseos","package":"openssl-libs","ranges":[{"type":"ECOSYSTEM","events":[{"introduced":"0"},{"fixed":"1:3.0.7-16.el9_2"}]}],"bundled":5},{"source":"osv","ecosystem":"Red Hat:enterprise_linux:9::baseos","package":"openssl-libs-debuginfo","ranges":[{"type":"ECOSYSTEM","events":[{"introduced":"0"},{"fixed":"1:3.0.7-16.el9_2"}]}],"bundled":5},{"source":"osv","ecosystem":"Red Hat:jboss_enterprise_web_server:5.7::el7","package":"jws5-tomcat-native","ranges":[{"type":"ECOSYSTEM","events":[{"introduced":"0"},{"fixed":"0:1.2.31-16.redhat_16.el7jws"}]}],"bundled":7},{"source":"osv","ecosystem":"Red Hat:jboss_enterprise_web_server:5.7::el7","package":"jws5-tomcat-native-debuginfo","ranges":[{"type":"ECOSYSTEM","events":[{"introduced":"0"},{"fixed":"0:1.2.31-16.redhat_16.el7jws"}]}],"bundled":7},{"source":"osv","ecosystem":"Red Hat:jboss_enterprise_web_server:5.7::el8","package":"jws5-tomcat-native","ranges":[{"type":"ECOSYSTEM","events":[{"introduced":"0"},{"fixed":"0:1.2.31-16.redhat_16.el8jws"}]}],"bundled":7},{"source":"osv","ecosystem":"Red Hat:jboss_enterprise_web_server:5.7::el8","package":"jws5-tomcat-native-debuginfo","ranges":[{"type":"ECOSYSTEM","events":[{"introduced":"0"},{"fixed":"0:1.2.31-16.redhat_16.el8jws"}]}],"bundled":7},{"source":"osv","ecosystem":"Red Hat:jboss_enterprise_web_server:5.7::el9","package":"jws5-tomcat-native","ranges":[{"type":"ECOSYSTEM","events":[{"introduced":"0"},{"fixed":"0:1.2.31-16.redhat_16.el9jws"}]}],"bundled":7},{"source":"osv","ecosystem":"Red Hat:jboss_enterprise_web_server:5.7::el9","package":"jws5-tomcat-native-debuginfo","ranges":[{"type":"ECOSYSTEM","events":[{"introduced":"0"},{"fixed":"0:1.2.31-16.redhat_16.el9jws"}]}],"bundled":7},{"source":"osv","ecosystem":"Red Hat:jboss_enterprise_web_server:5.7::el7","package":"jws5-tomcat","ranges":[{"type":"ECOSYSTEM","events":[{"introduced":"0"},{"fixed":"0:9.0.62-19.redhat_00017.1.el7jws"}]}],"bundled":7},{"source":"osv","ecosystem":"Red Hat:jboss_enterprise_web_server:5.7::el7","package":"jws5-tomcat-admin-webapps","ranges":[{"type":"ECOSYSTEM","events":[{"introduced":"0"},{"fixed":"0:9.0.62-19.redhat_00017.1.el7jws"}]}],"bundled":7},{"source":"osv","ecosystem":"Red Hat:jboss_enterprise_web_server:5.7::el7","package":"jws5-tomcat-docs-webapp","ranges":[{"type":"ECOSYSTEM","events":[{"introduced":"0"},{"fixed":"0:9.0.62-19.redhat_00017.1.el7jws"}]}],"bundled":7},{"source":"osv","ecosystem":"Red Hat:jboss_enterprise_web_server:5.7::el7","package":"jws5-tomcat-el-3.0-api","ranges":[{"type":"ECOSYSTEM","events":[{"introduced":"0"},{"fixed":"0:9.0.62-19.redhat_00017.1.el7jws"}]}],"bundled":7},{"source":"osv","ecosystem":"Red Hat:jboss_enterprise_web_server:5.7::el7","package":"jws5-tomcat-java-jdk11","ranges":[{"type":"ECOSYSTEM","events":[{"introduced":"0"},{"fixed":"0:9.0.62-19.redhat_00017.1.el7jws"}]}],"bundled":7},{"source":"osv","ecosystem":"Red Hat:jboss_enterprise_web_server:5.7::el7","package":"jws5-tomcat-java-jdk8","ranges":[{"type":"ECOSYSTEM","events":[{"introduced":"0"},{"fixed":"0:9.0.62-19.redhat_00017.1.el7jws"}]}],"bundled":7},{"source":"osv","ecosystem":"Red Hat:jboss_enterprise_web_server:5.7::el7","package":"jws5-tomcat-javadoc","ranges":[{"type":"ECOSYSTEM","events":[{"introduced":"0"},{"fixed":"0:9.0.62-19.redhat_00017.1.el7jws"}]}],"bundled":7},{"source":"osv","ecosystem":"Red Hat:jboss_enterprise_web_server:5.7::el7","package":"jws5-tomcat-jsp-2.3-api","ranges":[{"type":"ECOSYSTEM","events":[{"introduced":"0"},{"fixed":"0:9.0.62-19.redhat_00017.1.el7jws"}]}],"bundled":7},{"source":"osv","ecosystem":"Red Hat:jboss_enterprise_web_server:5.7::el7","package":"jws5-tomcat-lib","ranges":[{"type":"ECOSYSTEM","events":[{"introduced":"0"},{"fixed":"0:9.0.62-19.redhat_00017.1.el7jws"}]}],"bundled":7},{"source":"osv","ecosystem":"Red Hat:jboss_enterprise_web_server:5.7::el7","package":"jws5-tomcat-selinux","ranges":[{"type":"ECOSYSTEM","events":[{"introduced":"0"},{"fixed":"0:9.0.62-19.redhat_00017.1.el7jws"}]}],"bundled":7},{"source":"osv","ecosystem":"Red Hat:jboss_enterprise_web_server:5.7::el7","package":"jws5-tomcat-servlet-4.0-api","ranges":[{"type":"ECOSYSTEM","events":[{"introduced":"0"},{"fixed":"0:9.0.62-19.redhat_00017.1.el7jws"}]}],"bundled":7},{"source":"osv","ecosystem":"Red Hat:jboss_enterprise_web_server:5.7::el7","package":"jws5-tomcat-webapps","ranges":[{"type":"ECOSYSTEM","events":[{"introduced":"0"},{"fixed":"0:9.0.62-19.redhat_00017.1.el7jws"}]}],"bundled":7},{"source":"osv","ecosystem":"Red Hat:jboss_enterprise_web_server:5.7::el8","package":"jws5-tomcat","ranges":[{"type":"ECOSYSTEM","events":[{"introduced":"0"},{"fixed":"0:9.0.62-19.redhat_00017.1.el8jws"}]}],"bundled":7},{"source":"osv","ecosystem":"Red Hat:jboss_enterprise_web_server:5.7::el8","package":"jws5-tomcat-admin-webapps","ranges":[{"type":"ECOSYSTEM","events":[{"introduced":"0"},{"fixed":"0:9.0.62-19.redhat_00017.1.el8jws"}]}],"bundled":7},{"source":"osv","ecosystem":"Red Hat:jboss_enterprise_web_server:5.7::el8","package":"jws5-tomcat-docs-webapp","ranges":[{"type":"ECOSYSTEM","events":[{"introduced":"0"},{"fixed":"0:9.0.62-19.redhat_00017.1.el8jws"}]}],"bundled":7},{"source":"osv","ecosystem":"Red Hat:jboss_enterprise_web_server:5.7::el8","package":"jws5-tomcat-el-3.0-api","ranges":[{"type":"ECOSYSTEM","events":[{"introduced":"0"},{"fixed":"0:9.0.62-19.redhat_00017.1.el8jws"}]}],"bundled":7},{"source":"osv","ecosystem":"Red Hat:jboss_enterprise_web_server:5.7::el8","package":"jws5-tomcat-javadoc","ranges":[{"type":"ECOSYSTEM","events":[{"introduced":"0"},{"fixed":"0:9.0.62-19.redhat_00017.1.el8jws"}]}],"bundled":7},{"source":"osv","ecosystem":"Red Hat:jboss_enterprise_web_server:5.7::el8","package":"jws5-tomcat-jsp-2.3-api","ranges":[{"type":"ECOSYSTEM","events":[{"introduced":"0"},{"fixed":"0:9.0.62-19.redhat_00017.1.el8jws"}]}],"bundled":7},{"source":"osv","ecosystem":"Red Hat:jboss_enterprise_web_server:5.7::el8","package":"jws5-tomcat-lib","ranges":[{"type":"ECOSYSTEM","events":[{"introduced":"0"},{"fixed":"0:9.0.62-19.redhat_00017.1.el8jws"}]}],"bundled":7},{"source":"osv","ecosystem":"Red Hat:jboss_enterprise_web_server:5.7::el8","package":"jws5-tomcat-selinux","ranges":[{"type":"ECOSYSTEM","events":[{"introduced":"0"},{"fixed":"0:9.0.62-19.redhat_00017.1.el8jws"}]}],"bundled":7},{"source":"osv","ecosystem":"Red Hat:jboss_enterprise_web_server:5.7::el8","package":"jws5-tomcat-servlet-4.0-api","ranges":[{"type":"ECOSYSTEM","events":[{"introduced":"0"},{"fixed":"0:9.0.62-19.redhat_00017.1.el8jws"}]}],"bundled":7},{"source":"osv","ecosystem":"Red Hat:jboss_enterprise_web_server:5.7::el8","package":"jws5-tomcat-webapps","ranges":[{"type":"ECOSYSTEM","events":[{"introduced":"0"},{"fixed":"0:9.0.62-19.redhat_00017.1.el8jws"}]}],"bundled":7},{"source":"osv","ecosystem":"Red Hat:jboss_enterprise_web_server:5.7::el9","package":"jws5-tomcat","ranges":[{"type":"ECOSYSTEM","events":[{"introduced":"0"},{"fixed":"0:9.0.62-19.redhat_00017.1.el9jws"}]}],"bundled":7},{"source":"osv","ecosystem":"Red Hat:jboss_enterprise_web_server:5.7::el9","package":"jws5-tomcat-admin-webapps","ranges":[{"type":"ECOSYSTEM","events":[{"introduced":"0"},{"fixed":"0:9.0.62-19.redhat_00017.1.el9jws"}]}],"bundled":7},{"source":"osv","ecosystem":"Red Hat:jboss_enterprise_web_server:5.7::el9","package":"jws5-tomcat-docs-webapp","ranges":[{"type":"ECOSYSTEM","events":[{"introduced":"0"},{"fixed":"0:9.0.62-19.redhat_00017.1.el9jws"}]}],"bundled":7},{"source":"osv","ecosystem":"Red Hat:jboss_enterprise_web_server:5.7::el9","package":"jws5-tomcat-el-3.0-api","ranges":[{"type":"ECOSYSTEM","events":[{"introduced":"0"},{"fixed":"0:9.0.62-19.redhat_00017.1.el9jws"}]}],"bundled":7},{"source":"osv","ecosystem":"Red Hat:jboss_enterprise_web_server:5.7::el9","package":"jws5-tomcat-javadoc","ranges":[{"type":"ECOSYSTEM","events":[{"introduced":"0"},{"fixed":"0:9.0.62-19.redhat_00017.1.el9jws"}]}],"bundled":7},{"source":"osv","ecosystem":"Red Hat:jboss_enterprise_web_server:5.7::el9","package":"jws5-tomcat-jsp-2.3-api","ranges":[{"type":"ECOSYSTEM","events":[{"introduced":"0"},{"fixed":"0:9.0.62-19.redhat_00017.1.el9jws"}]}],"bundled":7},{"source":"osv","ecosystem":"Red Hat:jboss_enterprise_web_server:5.7::el9","package":"jws5-tomcat-lib","ranges":[{"type":"ECOSYSTEM","events":[{"introduced":"0"},{"fixed":"0:9.0.62-19.redhat_00017.1.el9jws"}]}],"bundled":7},{"source":"osv","ecosystem":"Red Hat:jboss_enterprise_web_server:5.7::el9","package":"jws5-tomcat-selinux","ranges":[{"type":"ECOSYSTEM","events":[{"introduced":"0"},{"fixed":"0:9.0.62-19.redhat_00017.1.el9jws"}]}],"bundled":7},{"source":"osv","ecosystem":"Red Hat:jboss_enterprise_web_server:5.7::el9","package":"jws5-tomcat-servlet-4.0-api","ranges":[{"type":"ECOSYSTEM","events":[{"introduced":"0"},{"fixed":"0:9.0.62-19.redhat_00017.1.el9jws"}]}],"bundled":7},{"source":"osv","ecosystem":"Red Hat:jboss_enterprise_web_server:5.7::el9","package":"jws5-tomcat-webapps","ranges":[{"type":"ECOSYSTEM","events":[{"introduced":"0"},{"fixed":"0:9.0.62-19.redhat_00017.1.el9jws"}]}],"bundled":7},{"source":"osv","ecosystem":"Red Hat:jboss_core_services:1::el7","package":"jbcs-httpd24-openssl","ranges":[{"type":"ECOSYSTEM","events":[{"introduced":"0"},{"fixed":"1:1.1.1k-16.el7jbcs"}]}],"bundled":11},{"source":"osv","ecosystem":"Red Hat:jboss_core_services:1::el7","package":"jbcs-httpd24-openssl-debuginfo","ranges":[{"type":"ECOSYSTEM","events":[{"introduced":"0"},{"fixed":"1:1.1.1k-16.el7jbcs"}]}],"bundled":11},{"source":"osv","ecosystem":"Red Hat:jboss_core_services:1::el7","package":"jbcs-httpd24-openssl-devel","ranges":[{"type":"ECOSYSTEM","events":[{"introduced":"0"},{"fixed":"1:1.1.1k-16.el7jbcs"}]}],"bundled":11},{"source":"osv","ecosystem":"Red Hat:jboss_core_services:1::el7","package":"jbcs-httpd24-openssl-libs","ranges":[{"type":"ECOSYSTEM","events":[{"introduced":"0"},{"fixed":"1:1.1.1k-16.el7jbcs"}]}],"bundled":11},{"source":"osv","ecosystem":"Red Hat:jboss_core_services:1::el7","package":"jbcs-httpd24-openssl-perl","ranges":[{"type":"ECOSYSTEM","events":[{"introduced":"0"},{"fixed":"1:1.1.1k-16.el7jbcs"}]}],"bundled":11},{"source":"osv","ecosystem":"Red Hat:jboss_core_services:1::el7","package":"jbcs-httpd24-openssl-static","ranges":[{"type":"ECOSYSTEM","events":[{"introduced":"0"},{"fixed":"1:1.1.1k-16.el7jbcs"}]}],"bundled":11},{"source":"osv","ecosystem":"Red Hat:jboss_core_services:1::el8","package":"jbcs-httpd24-openssl","ranges":[{"type":"ECOSYSTEM","events":[{"introduced":"0"},{"fixed":"1:1.1.1k-16.el8jbcs"}]}],"bundled":11},{"source":"osv","ecosystem":"Red Hat:jboss_core_services:1::el8","package":"jbcs-httpd24-openssl-debuginfo","ranges":[{"type":"ECOSYSTEM","events":[{"introduced":"0"},{"fixed":"1:1.1.1k-16.el8jbcs"}]}],"bundled":11},{"source":"osv","ecosystem":"Red Hat:jboss_core_services:1::el8","package":"jbcs-httpd24-openssl-devel","ranges":[{"type":"ECOSYSTEM","events":[{"introduced":"0"},{"fixed":"1:1.1.1k-16.el8jbcs"}]}],"bundled":11},{"source":"osv","ecosystem":"Red Hat:jboss_core_services:1::el8","package":"jbcs-httpd24-openssl-libs","ranges":[{"type":"ECOSYSTEM","events":[{"introduced":"0"},{"fixed":"1:1.1.1k-16.el8jbcs"}]}],"bundled":11},{"source":"osv","ecosystem":"Red Hat:jboss_core_services:1::el8","package":"jbcs-httpd24-openssl-libs-debuginfo","ranges":[{"type":"ECOSYSTEM","events":[{"introduced":"0"},{"fixed":"1:1.1.1k-16.el8jbcs"}]}],"bundled":11},{"source":"osv","ecosystem":"Red Hat:jboss_core_services:1::el8","package":"jbcs-httpd24-openssl-perl","ranges":[{"type":"ECOSYSTEM","events":[{"introduced":"0"},{"fixed":"1:1.1.1k-16.el8jbcs"}]}],"bundled":11},{"source":"osv","ecosystem":"Red Hat:jboss_core_services:1::el8","package":"jbcs-httpd24-openssl-static","ranges":[{"type":"ECOSYSTEM","events":[{"introduced":"0"},{"fixed":"1:1.1.1k-16.el8jbcs"}]}],"bundled":11},{"source":"osv","ecosystem":"Red Hat:jboss_core_services:1::el7","package":"jbcs-httpd24-curl","ranges":[{"type":"ECOSYSTEM","events":[{"introduced":"0"},{"fixed":"0:8.4.0-2.el7jbcs"}]}],"bundled":11},{"source":"osv","ecosystem":"Red Hat:jboss_core_services:1::el7","package":"jbcs-httpd24-curl-debuginfo","ranges":[{"type":"ECOSYSTEM","events":[{"introduced":"0"},{"fixed":"0:8.4.0-2.el7jbcs"}]}],"bundled":11},{"source":"osv","ecosystem":"Red Hat:jboss_core_services:1::el7","package":"jbcs-httpd24-libcurl","ranges":[{"type":"ECOSYSTEM","events":[{"introduced":"0"},{"fixed":"0:8.4.0-2.el7jbcs"}]}],"bundled":11},{"source":"osv","ecosystem":"Red Hat:jboss_core_services:1::el7","package":"jbcs-httpd24-libcurl-devel","ranges":[{"type":"ECOSYSTEM","events":[{"introduced":"0"},{"fixed":"0:8.4.0-2.el7jbcs"}]}],"bundled":11},{"source":"osv","ecosystem":"Red Hat:jboss_core_services:1::el8","package":"jbcs-httpd24-curl","ranges":[{"type":"ECOSYSTEM","events":[{"introduced":"0"},{"fixed":"0:8.4.0-2.el8jbcs"}]}],"bundled":11},{"source":"osv","ecosystem":"Red Hat:jboss_core_services:1::el8","package":"jbcs-httpd24-curl-debuginfo","ranges":[{"type":"ECOSYSTEM","events":[{"introduced":"0"},{"fixed":"0:8.4.0-2.el8jbcs"}]}],"bundled":11},{"source":"osv","ecosystem":"Red Hat:jboss_core_services:1::el8","package":"jbcs-httpd24-libcurl","ranges":[{"type":"ECOSYSTEM","events":[{"introduced":"0"},{"fixed":"0:8.4.0-2.el8jbcs"}]}],"bundled":11},{"source":"osv","ecosystem":"Red Hat:jboss_core_services:1::el8","package":"jbcs-httpd24-libcurl-debuginfo","ranges":[{"type":"ECOSYSTEM","events":[{"introduced":"0"},{"fixed":"0:8.4.0-2.el8jbcs"}]}],"bundled":11},{"source":"osv","ecosystem":"Red Hat:jboss_core_services:1::el8","package":"jbcs-httpd24-libcurl-devel","ranges":[{"type":"ECOSYSTEM","events":[{"introduced":"0"},{"fixed":"0:8.4.0-2.el8jbcs"}]}],"bundled":11},{"source":"osv","ecosystem":"Red Hat:jboss_core_services:1::el7","package":"jbcs-httpd24-mod_jk","ranges":[{"type":"ECOSYSTEM","events":[{"introduced":"0"},{"fixed":"0:1.2.49-1.redhat_1.el7jbcs"}]}],"bundled":11},{"source":"osv","ecosystem":"Red Hat:jboss_core_services:1::el7","package":"jbcs-httpd24-mod_jk-ap24","ranges":[{"type":"ECOSYSTEM","events":[{"introduced":"0"},{"fixed":"0:1.2.49-1.redhat_1.el7jbcs"}]}],"bundled":11},{"source":"osv","ecosystem":"Red Hat:jboss_core_services:1::el7","package":"jbcs-httpd24-mod_jk-debuginfo","ranges":[{"type":"ECOSYSTEM","events":[{"introduced":"0"},{"fixed":"0:1.2.49-1.redhat_1.el7jbcs"}]}],"bundled":11},{"source":"osv","ecosystem":"Red Hat:jboss_core_services:1::el8","package":"jbcs-httpd24-mod_jk","ranges":[{"type":"ECOSYSTEM","events":[{"introduced":"0"},{"fixed":"0:1.2.49-1.redhat_1.el8jbcs"}]}],"bundled":11},{"source":"osv","ecosystem":"Red Hat:jboss_core_services:1::el8","package":"jbcs-httpd24-mod_jk-ap24","ranges":[{"type":"ECOSYSTEM","events":[{"introduced":"0"},{"fixed":"0:1.2.49-1.redhat_1.el8jbcs"}]}],"bundled":11},{"source":"osv","ecosystem":"Red Hat:jboss_core_services:1::el8","package":"jbcs-httpd24-mod_jk-ap24-debuginfo","ranges":[{"type":"ECOSYSTEM","events":[{"introduced":"0"},{"fixed":"0:1.2.49-1.redhat_1.el8jbcs"}]}],"bundled":11},{"source":"osv","ecosystem":"Red Hat:jboss_core_services:1::el7","package":"jbcs-httpd24-mod_http2","ranges":[{"type":"ECOSYSTEM","events":[{"introduced":"0"},{"fixed":"0:1.15.19-32.el7jbcs"}]}],"bundled":11},{"source":"osv","ecosystem":"Red Hat:jboss_core_services:1::el7","package":"jbcs-httpd24-mod_http2-debuginfo","ranges":[{"type":"ECOSYSTEM","events":[{"introduced":"0"},{"fixed":"0:1.15.19-32.el7jbcs"}]}],"bundled":11},{"source":"osv","ecosystem":"Red Hat:jboss_core_services:1::el8","package":"jbcs-httpd24-mod_http2","ranges":[{"type":"ECOSYSTEM","events":[{"introduced":"0"},{"fixed":"0:1.15.19-32.el8jbcs"}]}],"bundled":11},{"source":"osv","ecosystem":"Red Hat:jboss_core_services:1::el8","package":"jbcs-httpd24-mod_http2-debuginfo","ranges":[{"type":"ECOSYSTEM","events":[{"introduced":"0"},{"fixed":"0:1.15.19-32.el8jbcs"}]}],"bundled":11},{"source":"osv","ecosystem":"SUSE:Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 15 SP2-LTSS","package":"openssl-1_1","ranges":[{"type":"ECOSYSTEM","events":[{"introduced":"0"},{"fixed":"1.1.1d-150200.11.62.1"}]}],"bundled":3},{"source":"osv","ecosystem":"SUSE:Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 15 SP3-ESPOS","package":"openssl-1_1","ranges":[{"type":"ECOSYSTEM","events":[{"introduced":"0"},{"fixed":"1.1.1d-150200.11.62.1"}]}],"bundled":3},{"source":"osv","ecosystem":"SUSE:Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 15 SP3-LTSS","package":"openssl-1_1","ranges":[{"type":"ECOSYSTEM","events":[{"introduced":"0"},{"fixed":"1.1.1d-150200.11.62.1"}]}],"bundled":3},{"source":"osv","ecosystem":"SUSE:Linux Enterprise Real Time 15 SP3","package":"openssl-1_1","ranges":[{"type":"ECOSYSTEM","events":[{"introduced":"0"},{"fixed":"1.1.1d-150200.11.62.1"}]}],"bundled":3},{"source":"osv","ecosystem":"SUSE:Linux Enterprise Server 15 SP2-LTSS","package":"openssl-1_1","ranges":[{"type":"ECOSYSTEM","events":[{"introduced":"0"},{"fixed":"1.1.1d-150200.11.62.1"}]}],"bundled":3},{"source":"osv","ecosystem":"SUSE:Linux Enterprise Server 15 SP3-LTSS","package":"openssl-1_1","ranges":[{"type":"ECOSYSTEM","events":[{"introduced":"0"},{"fixed":"1.1.1d-150200.11.62.1"}]}],"bundled":3},{"source":"osv","ecosystem":"SUSE:Linux Enterprise Server for SAP Applications 15 SP2","package":"openssl-1_1","ranges":[{"type":"ECOSYSTEM","events":[{"introduced":"0"},{"fixed":"1.1.1d-150200.11.62.1"}]}],"bundled":3},{"source":"osv","ecosystem":"SUSE:Linux Enterprise Server for SAP Applications 15 SP3","package":"openssl-1_1","ranges":[{"type":"ECOSYSTEM","events":[{"introduced":"0"},{"fixed":"1.1.1d-150200.11.62.1"}]}],"bundled":3},{"source":"osv","ecosystem":"SUSE:Manager Proxy 4.2","package":"openssl-1_1","ranges":[{"type":"ECOSYSTEM","events":[{"introduced":"0"},{"fixed":"1.1.1d-150200.11.62.1"}]}],"bundled":3},{"source":"osv","ecosystem":"SUSE:Manager Server 4.2","package":"openssl-1_1","ranges":[{"type":"ECOSYSTEM","events":[{"introduced":"0"},{"fixed":"1.1.1d-150200.11.62.1"}]}],"bundled":3},{"source":"osv","ecosystem":"SUSE:Linux Enterprise Micro 5.1","package":"openssl-1_1","ranges":[{"type":"ECOSYSTEM","events":[{"introduced":"0"},{"fixed":"1.1.1d-150200.11.62.1"}]}],"bundled":3},{"source":"osv","ecosystem":"SUSE:Linux Enterprise Micro 5.2","package":"openssl-1_1","ranges":[{"type":"ECOSYSTEM","events":[{"introduced":"0"},{"fixed":"1.1.1d-150200.11.62.1"}]}],"bundled":3},{"source":"osv","ecosystem":"SUSE:Enterprise Storage 7","package":"openssl-1_1","ranges":[{"type":"ECOSYSTEM","events":[{"introduced":"0"},{"fixed":"1.1.1d-150200.11.62.1"}]}],"bundled":3},{"source":"osv","ecosystem":"SUSE:Enterprise Storage 7.1","package":"openssl-1_1","ranges":[{"type":"ECOSYSTEM","events":[{"introduced":"0"},{"fixed":"1.1.1d-150200.11.62.1"}]}],"bundled":3},{"source":"osv","ecosystem":"SUSE:OpenStack Cloud 9","package":"openssl-1_1","ranges":[{"type":"ECOSYSTEM","events":[{"introduced":"0"},{"fixed":"1.1.1d-2.81.1"}]}],"bundled":2},{"source":"osv","ecosystem":"SUSE:OpenStack Cloud Crowbar 9","package":"openssl-1_1","ranges":[{"type":"ECOSYSTEM","events":[{"introduced":"0"},{"fixed":"1.1.1d-2.81.1"}]}],"bundled":2},{"source":"osv","ecosystem":"SUSE:Linux Enterprise Server for SAP Applications 12 SP4","package":"openssl-1_1","ranges":[{"type":"ECOSYSTEM","events":[{"introduced":"0"},{"fixed":"1.1.1d-2.81.1"}]}],"bundled":2},{"source":"osv","ecosystem":"SUSE:Linux Enterprise Software Development Kit 12 SP5","package":"openssl-1_1","ranges":[{"type":"ECOSYSTEM","events":[{"introduced":"0"},{"fixed":"1.1.1d-2.81.1"}]}],"bundled":2},{"source":"osv","ecosystem":"SUSE:Linux Enterprise Server 12 SP4-ESPOS","package":"openssl-1_1","ranges":[{"type":"ECOSYSTEM","events":[{"introduced":"0"},{"fixed":"1.1.1d-2.81.1"}]}],"bundled":2},{"source":"osv","ecosystem":"SUSE:Linux Enterprise Server 12 SP4-LTSS","package":"openssl-1_1","ranges":[{"type":"ECOSYSTEM","events":[{"introduced":"0"},{"fixed":"1.1.1d-2.81.1"}]}],"bundled":2},{"source":"osv","ecosystem":"SUSE:Linux Enterprise Server 12 SP5","package":"openssl-1_1","ranges":[{"type":"ECOSYSTEM","events":[{"introduced":"0"},{"fixed":"1.1.1d-2.81.1"}]}],"bundled":2},{"source":"osv","ecosystem":"SUSE:Linux Enterprise Server for SAP Applications 12 SP5","package":"openssl-1_1","ranges":[{"type":"ECOSYSTEM","events":[{"introduced":"0"},{"fixed":"1.1.1d-2.81.1"}]}],"bundled":2},{"source":"osv","ecosystem":"SUSE:Linux Enterprise Module for Basesystem 15 SP4","package":"openssl-3","ranges":[{"type":"ECOSYSTEM","events":[{"introduced":"0"},{"fixed":"3.0.1-150400.4.23.1"}]}],"bundled":2},{"source":"osv","ecosystem":"openSUSE:Leap 15.4","package":"openssl-3","ranges":[{"type":"ECOSYSTEM","events":[{"introduced":"0"},{"fixed":"3.0.1-150400.4.23.1"}]}],"bundled":2},{"source":"osv","ecosystem":"SUSE:Linux Enterprise Server 12 SP2-BCL","package":"openssl","ranges":[{"type":"ECOSYSTEM","events":[{"introduced":"0"},{"fixed":"1.0.2j-60.92.1"}]}],"bundled":2},{"source":"osv","ecosystem":"SUSE:Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 15 SP1-LTSS","package":"openssl-1_1","ranges":[{"type":"ECOSYSTEM","events":[{"introduced":"0"},{"fixed":"1.1.0i-150100.14.48.1"}]}],"bundled":2},{"source":"osv","ecosystem":"SUSE:Linux Enterprise Server 15 SP1-LTSS","package":"openssl-1_1","ranges":[{"type":"ECOSYSTEM","events":[{"introduced":"0"},{"fixed":"1.1.0i-150100.14.48.1"}]}],"bundled":2},{"source":"osv","ecosystem":"SUSE:Linux Enterprise Server for SAP Applications 15 SP1","package":"openssl-1_1","ranges":[{"type":"ECOSYSTEM","events":[{"introduced":"0"},{"fixed":"1.1.0i-150100.14.48.1"}]}],"bundled":2},{"source":"osv","ecosystem":"SUSE:Linux Enterprise Micro 5.3","package":"openssl-1_1","ranges":[{"type":"ECOSYSTEM","events":[{"introduced":"0"},{"fixed":"1.1.1l-150400.7.34.1"}]}],"bundled":2},{"source":"osv","ecosystem":"SUSE:Linux Enterprise Micro 5.4","package":"openssl-1_1","ranges":[{"type":"ECOSYSTEM","events":[{"introduced":"0"},{"fixed":"1.1.1l-150400.7.34.1"}]}],"bundled":2},{"source":"osv","ecosystem":"SUSE:Linux Enterprise Module for Basesystem 15 SP4","package":"openssl-1_1","ranges":[{"type":"ECOSYSTEM","events":[{"introduced":"0"},{"fixed":"1.1.1l-150400.7.34.1"}]}],"bundled":2},{"source":"osv","ecosystem":"openSUSE:Leap Micro 5.3","package":"openssl-1_1","ranges":[{"type":"ECOSYSTEM","events":[{"introduced":"0"},{"fixed":"1.1.1l-150400.7.34.1"}]}],"bundled":2},{"source":"osv","ecosystem":"openSUSE:Leap 15.4","package":"openssl-1_1","ranges":[{"type":"ECOSYSTEM","events":[{"introduced":"0"},{"fixed":"1.1.1l-150400.7.34.1"}]}],"bundled":2},{"source":"osv","ecosystem":"SUSE:Linux Enterprise Module for Legacy 12","package":"compat-openssl098","ranges":[{"type":"ECOSYSTEM","events":[{"introduced":"0"},{"fixed":"0.9.8j-106.48.1"}]}]},{"source":"osv","ecosystem":"SUSE:Linux Enterprise Server for SAP Applications 12 SP4","package":"compat-openssl098","ranges":[{"type":"ECOSYSTEM","events":[{"introduced":"0"},{"fixed":"0.9.8j-106.48.1"}]}]},{"source":"osv","ecosystem":"SUSE:Linux Enterprise Server for SAP Applications 12 SP5","package":"compat-openssl098","ranges":[{"type":"ECOSYSTEM","events":[{"introduced":"0"},{"fixed":"0.9.8j-106.48.1"}]}]},{"source":"osv","ecosystem":"SUSE:OpenStack Cloud 9","package":"openssl-1_0_0","ranges":[{"type":"ECOSYSTEM","events":[{"introduced":"0"},{"fixed":"1.0.2p-3.72.1"}]}],"bundled":2},{"source":"osv","ecosystem":"SUSE:OpenStack Cloud Crowbar 9","package":"openssl-1_0_0","ranges":[{"type":"ECOSYSTEM","events":[{"introduced":"0"},{"fixed":"1.0.2p-3.72.1"}]}],"bundled":2},{"source":"osv","ecosystem":"SUSE:Linux Enterprise Server for SAP Applications 12 SP4","package":"openssl-1_0_0","ranges":[{"type":"ECOSYSTEM","events":[{"introduced":"0"},{"fixed":"1.0.2p-3.72.1"}]}],"bundled":2},{"source":"osv","ecosystem":"SUSE:Linux Enterprise Software Development Kit 12 SP5","package":"openssl-1_0_0","ranges":[{"type":"ECOSYSTEM","events":[{"introduced":"0"},{"fixed":"1.0.2p-3.72.1"}]}],"bundled":2},{"source":"osv","ecosystem":"SUSE:Linux Enterprise Server 12 SP4-ESPOS","package":"openssl-1_0_0","ranges":[{"type":"ECOSYSTEM","events":[{"introduced":"0"},{"fixed":"1.0.2p-3.72.1"}]}],"bundled":2},{"source":"osv","ecosystem":"SUSE:Linux Enterprise Server 12 SP4-LTSS","package":"openssl-1_0_0","ranges":[{"type":"ECOSYSTEM","events":[{"introduced":"0"},{"fixed":"1.0.2p-3.72.1"}]}],"bundled":2},{"source":"osv","ecosystem":"SUSE:Linux Enterprise Server 12 SP5","package":"openssl-1_0_0","ranges":[{"type":"ECOSYSTEM","events":[{"introduced":"0"},{"fixed":"1.0.2p-3.72.1"}]}],"bundled":2},{"source":"osv","ecosystem":"SUSE:Linux Enterprise Server for SAP Applications 12 SP5","package":"openssl-1_0_0","ranges":[{"type":"ECOSYSTEM","events":[{"introduced":"0"},{"fixed":"1.0.2p-3.72.1"}]}],"bundled":2},{"source":"osv","ecosystem":"SUSE:Linux Enterprise Module for Legacy 15 SP4","package":"openssl-1_0_0","ranges":[{"type":"ECOSYSTEM","events":[{"introduced":"0"},{"fixed":"1.0.2p-150000.3.73.1"}]}],"bundled":2},{"source":"osv","ecosystem":"SUSE:Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 15 SP3-ESPOS","package":"openssl-1_0_0","ranges":[{"type":"ECOSYSTEM","events":[{"introduced":"0"},{"fixed":"1.0.2p-150000.3.73.1"}]}],"bundled":2},{"source":"osv","ecosystem":"SUSE:Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 15 SP3-LTSS","package":"openssl-1_0_0","ranges":[{"type":"ECOSYSTEM","events":[{"introduced":"0"},{"fixed":"1.0.2p-150000.3.73.1"}]}],"bundled":2},{"source":"osv","ecosystem":"SUSE:Linux Enterprise Server 15 SP1-LTSS","package":"openssl-1_0_0","ranges":[{"type":"ECOSYSTEM","events":[{"introduced":"0"},{"fixed":"1.0.2p-150000.3.73.1"}]}],"bundled":2},{"source":"osv","ecosystem":"SUSE:Linux Enterprise Server 15 SP2-LTSS","package":"openssl-1_0_0","ranges":[{"type":"ECOSYSTEM","events":[{"introduced":"0"},{"fixed":"1.0.2p-150000.3.73.1"}]}],"bundled":2},{"source":"osv","ecosystem":"SUSE:Linux Enterprise Server 15 SP3-LTSS","package":"openssl-1_0_0","ranges":[{"type":"ECOSYSTEM","events":[{"introduced":"0"},{"fixed":"1.0.2p-150000.3.73.1"}]}],"bundled":2},{"source":"osv","ecosystem":"SUSE:Linux Enterprise Server for SAP Applications 15 SP1","package":"openssl-1_0_0","ranges":[{"type":"ECOSYSTEM","events":[{"introduced":"0"},{"fixed":"1.0.2p-150000.3.73.1"}]}],"bundled":2},{"source":"osv","ecosystem":"SUSE:Linux Enterprise Server for SAP Applications 15 SP2","package":"openssl-1_0_0","ranges":[{"type":"ECOSYSTEM","events":[{"introduced":"0"},{"fixed":"1.0.2p-150000.3.73.1"}]}],"bundled":2},{"source":"osv","ecosystem":"SUSE:Linux Enterprise Server for SAP Applications 15 SP3","package":"openssl-1_0_0","ranges":[{"type":"ECOSYSTEM","events":[{"introduced":"0"},{"fixed":"1.0.2p-150000.3.73.1"}]}],"bundled":2},{"source":"osv","ecosystem":"SUSE:Enterprise Storage 7","package":"openssl-1_0_0","ranges":[{"type":"ECOSYSTEM","events":[{"introduced":"0"},{"fixed":"1.0.2p-150000.3.73.1"}]}],"bundled":2},{"source":"osv","ecosystem":"SUSE:Enterprise Storage 7.1","package":"openssl-1_0_0","ranges":[{"type":"ECOSYSTEM","events":[{"introduced":"0"},{"fixed":"1.0.2p-150000.3.73.1"}]}],"bundled":2},{"source":"osv","ecosystem":"openSUSE:Leap 15.4","package":"openssl-1_0_0","ranges":[{"type":"ECOSYSTEM","events":[{"introduced":"0"},{"fixed":"1.0.2p-150000.3.73.1"}]}],"bundled":2},{"source":"osv","ecosystem":"SUSE:Linux Enterprise Server 11 SP4 LTSS EXTREME CORE","package":"openssl1","ranges":[{"type":"ECOSYSTEM","events":[{"introduced":"0"},{"fixed":"1.0.1g-0.58.62.1"}]}],"bundled":2},{"source":"osv","ecosystem":"SUSE:Linux Enterprise Server 11 SP4 LTSS EXTREME CORE","package":"openssl","ranges":[{"type":"ECOSYSTEM","events":[{"introduced":"0"},{"fixed":"0.9.8j-0.106.66.1"}]}]},{"source":"osv","ecosystem":"Ubuntu:Pro:14.04:LTS","package":"openssl","ranges":[{"type":"ECOSYSTEM","events":[{"introduced":"0"},{"fixed":"1.0.1f-1ubuntu2.27+esm7"}]}],"versions":["1.0.1e-3ubuntu1","1.0.1e-4ubuntu1","1.0.1e-4ubuntu2","1.0.1e-4ubuntu3","1.0.1e-4ubuntu4","1.0.1f-1ubuntu1","1.0.1f-1ubuntu2","1.0.1f-1ubuntu2.1","1.0.1f-1ubuntu2.2","1.0.1f-1ubuntu2.3","1.0.1f-1ubuntu2.4","1.0.1f-1ubuntu2.5","1.0.1f-1ubuntu2.7","1.0.1f-1ubuntu2.8","1.0.1f-1ubuntu2.11","1.0.1f-1ubuntu2.12","1.0.1f-1ubuntu2.15","1.0.1f-1ubuntu2.16","1.0.1f-1ubuntu2.17","1.0.1f-1ubuntu2.18","1.0.1f-1ubuntu2.19","1.0.1f-1ubuntu2.20","1.0.1f-1ubuntu2.21","1.0.1f-1ubuntu2.22","1.0.1f-1ubuntu2.23","1.0.1f-1ubuntu2.24","1.0.1f-1ubuntu2.25","1.0.1f-1ubuntu2.26","1.0.1f-1ubuntu2.27","1.0.1f-1ubuntu2.27+esm1","1.0.1f-1ubuntu2.27+esm2","1.0.1f-1ubuntu2.27+esm3","1.0.1f-1ubuntu2.27+esm4","1.0.1f-1ubuntu2.27+esm5","1.0.1f-1ubuntu2.27+esm6"]},{"source":"osv","ecosystem":"Ubuntu:Pro:16.04:LTS","package":"openssl","ranges":[{"type":"ECOSYSTEM","events":[{"introduced":"0"},{"fixed":"1.0.2g-1ubuntu4.20+esm7"}]}],"versions":["1.0.2d-0ubuntu1","1.0.2d-0ubuntu2","1.0.2e-1ubuntu1","1.0.2f-2ubuntu1","1.0.2g-1ubuntu2","1.0.2g-1ubuntu3","1.0.2g-1ubuntu4","1.0.2g-1ubuntu4.1","1.0.2g-1ubuntu4.2","1.0.2g-1ubuntu4.4","1.0.2g-1ubuntu4.5","1.0.2g-1ubuntu4.6","1.0.2g-1ubuntu4.8","1.0.2g-1ubuntu4.9","1.0.2g-1ubuntu4.10","1.0.2g-1ubuntu4.11","1.0.2g-1ubuntu4.12","1.0.2g-1ubuntu4.13","1.0.2g-1ubuntu4.14","1.0.2g-1ubuntu4.15","1.0.2g-1ubuntu4.16","1.0.2g-1ubuntu4.17","1.0.2g-1ubuntu4.18","1.0.2g-1ubuntu4.19","1.0.2g-1ubuntu4.20","1.0.2g-1ubuntu4.20+esm1","1.0.2g-1ubuntu4.20+esm2","1.0.2g-1ubuntu4.20+esm3","1.0.2g-1ubuntu4.20+esm4","1.0.2g-1ubuntu4.20+esm5","1.0.2g-1ubuntu4.20+esm6"]},{"source":"osv","ecosystem":"Ubuntu:Pro:16.04:LTS","package":"edk2","ranges":[{"type":"ECOSYSTEM","events":[{"introduced":"0"}]}],"versions":["0~20150106.5c2d456b-2","0~20160104.c2a892d7-1","0~20160408.ffea0a2c-2","0~20160408.ffea0a2c-2ubuntu0.1","0~20160408.ffea0a2c-2ubuntu0.2","0~20160408.ffea0a2c-2ubuntu0.2+esm1","0~20160408.ffea0a2c-2ubuntu0.2+esm3","0~20160408.ffea0a2c-2ubuntu0.2+esm4"]},{"source":"osv","ecosystem":"Ubuntu:Pro:FIPS-updates:16.04:LTS","package":"openssl","ranges":[{"type":"ECOSYSTEM","events":[{"introduced":"0"},{"fixed":"1.0.2g-1ubuntu4.fips.4.20.7"}]}],"versions":["1.0.2g-1ubuntu4.fips.4.9.1","1.0.2g-1ubuntu4.fips.4.13.1","1.0.2g-1ubuntu4.fips.4.15.1","1.0.2g-1ubuntu4.fips.4.16.1","1.0.2g-1ubuntu4.fips.4.17.1","1.0.2g-1ubuntu4.fips.4.18.1","1.0.2g-1ubuntu4.fips.4.19.3","1.0.2g-1ubuntu4.fips.4.20.1","1.0.2g-1ubuntu4.fips.4.20.2","1.0.2g-1ubuntu4.fips.4.20.3","1.0.2g-1ubuntu4.fips.4.20.6"]},{"source":"osv","ecosystem":"Ubuntu:Pro:FIPS:16.04:LTS","package":"openssl","ranges":[{"type":"ECOSYSTEM","events":[{"introduced":"0"}]}],"versions":["1.0.2g-1ubuntu4.fips.4.6~ppa1","1.0.2g-1ubuntu4.fips.4.6~ppa2","1.0.2g-1ubuntu4.fips.4.6~ppa3","1.0.2g-1ubuntu4.fips.4.6","1.0.2g-1ubuntu4.fips.4.6.1","1.0.2g-1ubuntu4.fips.4.6.2","1.0.2g-1ubuntu4.fips.4.6.3"]},{"source":"osv","ecosystem":"Ubuntu:18.04:LTS","package":"openssl","ranges":[{"type":"ECOSYSTEM","events":[{"introduced":"0"},{"fixed":"1.1.1-1ubuntu2.1~18.04.22"}]}],"versions":["1.0.2g-1ubuntu13","1.0.2g-1ubuntu14","1.0.2n-1ubuntu1","1.1.0g-2ubuntu1","1.1.0g-2ubuntu2","1.1.0g-2ubuntu3","1.1.0g-2ubuntu4","1.1.0g-2ubuntu4.1","1.1.0g-2ubuntu4.3","1.1.1-1ubuntu2.1~18.04.1","1.1.1-1ubuntu2.1~18.04.2","1.1.1-1ubuntu2.1~18.04.3","1.1.1-1ubuntu2.1~18.04.4","1.1.1-1ubuntu2.1~18.04.5","1.1.1-1ubuntu2.1~18.04.6","1.1.1-1ubuntu2.1~18.04.7","1.1.1-1ubuntu2.1~18.04.8","1.1.1-1ubuntu2.1~18.04.9","1.1.1-1ubuntu2.1~18.04.10","1.1.1-1ubuntu2.1~18.04.13","1.1.1-1ubuntu2.1~18.04.14","1.1.1-1ubuntu2.1~18.04.15","1.1.1-1ubuntu2.1~18.04.17","1.1.1-1ubuntu2.1~18.04.19","1.1.1-1ubuntu2.1~18.04.20","1.1.1-1ubuntu2.1~18.04.21"]},{"source":"osv","ecosystem":"Ubuntu:18.04:LTS","package":"openssl1.0","ranges":[{"type":"ECOSYSTEM","events":[{"introduced":"0"},{"fixed":"1.0.2n-1ubuntu5.12"}]}],"versions":["1.0.2n-1ubuntu2","1.0.2n-1ubuntu3","1.0.2n-1ubuntu4","1.0.2n-1ubuntu5","1.0.2n-1ubuntu5.1","1.0.2n-1ubuntu5.2","1.0.2n-1ubuntu5.3","1.0.2n-1ubuntu5.4","1.0.2n-1ubuntu5.5","1.0.2n-1ubuntu5.6","1.0.2n-1ubuntu5.7","1.0.2n-1ubuntu5.8","1.0.2n-1ubuntu5.9","1.0.2n-1ubuntu5.10","1.0.2n-1ubuntu5.11"]},{"source":"osv","ecosystem":"Ubuntu:Pro:18.04:LTS","package":"edk2","ranges":[{"type":"ECOSYSTEM","events":[{"introduced":"0"}]}],"versions":["0~20170911.5dfba97c-1","0~20171010.234dbcef-1","0~20171027.76fd5a66-1","0~20171205.a9212288-1","0~20180105.0bc94c74-1","0~20180205.c0d9813c-1","0~20180205.c0d9813c-2","0~20180205.c0d9813c-2ubuntu0.1","0~20180205.c0d9813c-2ubuntu0.2","0~20180205.c0d9813c-2ubuntu0.3","0~20180205.c0d9813c-2ubuntu0.3+esm1","0~20180205.c0d9813c-2ubuntu0.3+esm2","0~20180205.c0d9813c-2ubuntu0.3+esm3"]},{"source":"osv","ecosystem":"Ubuntu:Pro:FIPS-updates:18.04:LTS","package":"openssl","ranges":[{"type":"ECOSYSTEM","events":[{"introduced":"0"},{"fixed":"1.1.1-1ubuntu2.fips.2.1~18.04.22"}]}],"versions":["1.1.1-1ubuntu2.fips.2.1~18.04.5.1","1.1.1-1ubuntu2.fips.2.1~18.04.6.1","1.1.1-1ubuntu2.fips.2.1~18.04.7.1","1.1.1-1ubuntu2.fips.2.1~18.04.9.1","1.1.1-1ubuntu2.fips.2.1~18.04.9.2","1.1.1-1ubuntu2.fips.2.1~18.04.9.3","1.1.1-1ubuntu2.fips.2.1~18.04.13.2","1.1.1-1ubuntu2.fips.2.1~18.04.15","1.1.1-1ubuntu2.fips.2.1~18.04.15.1","1.1.1-1ubuntu2.fips.2.1~18.04.15.2","1.1.1-1ubuntu2.fips.2.1~18.04.17","1.1.1-1ubuntu2.fips.2.1~18.04.20","1.1.1-1ubuntu2.fips.2.1~18.04.21"]},{"source":"osv","ecosystem":"Ubuntu:Pro:FIPS:18.04:LTS","package":"openssl","ranges":[{"type":"ECOSYSTEM","events":[{"introduced":"0"}]}],"versions":["1.1.1-1ubuntu2.fips.2.1~18.04.3.1","1.1.1-1ubuntu2.fips.2.1~18.04.15.2"]},{"source":"osv","ecosystem":"Ubuntu:20.04:LTS","package":"openssl","ranges":[{"type":"ECOSYSTEM","events":[{"introduced":"0"},{"fixed":"1.1.1f-1ubuntu2.18"}]}],"versions":["1.1.1c-1ubuntu4","1.1.1d-2ubuntu3","1.1.1d-2ubuntu6","1.1.1f-1ubuntu1","1.1.1f-1ubuntu2","1.1.1f-1ubuntu2.1","1.1.1f-1ubuntu2.2","1.1.1f-1ubuntu2.3","1.1.1f-1ubuntu2.4","1.1.1f-1ubuntu2.5","1.1.1f-1ubuntu2.8","1.1.1f-1ubuntu2.9","1.1.1f-1ubuntu2.10","1.1.1f-1ubuntu2.11","1.1.1f-1ubuntu2.12","1.1.1f-1ubuntu2.13","1.1.1f-1ubuntu2.15","1.1.1f-1ubuntu2.16","1.1.1f-1ubuntu2.17"]},{"source":"osv","ecosystem":"Ubuntu:Pro:20.04:LTS","package":"edk2","ranges":[{"type":"ECOSYSTEM","events":[{"introduced":"0"}]}],"versions":["0~20190606.20d2e5a1-2ubuntu1","0~20190828.37eef910-3","0~20190828.37eef910-4","0~20191122.bd85bf54-1","0~20191122.bd85bf54-1ubuntu1","0~20191122.bd85bf54-2","0~20191122.bd85bf54-2ubuntu1","0~20191122.bd85bf54-2ubuntu2","0~20191122.bd85bf54-2ubuntu3","0~20191122.bd85bf54-2ubuntu3.1","0~20191122.bd85bf54-2ubuntu3.2","0~20191122.bd85bf54-2ubuntu3.3","0~20191122.bd85bf54-2ubuntu3.4","0~20191122.bd85bf54-2ubuntu3.5","0~20191122.bd85bf54-2ubuntu3.6","0~20191122.bd85bf54-2ubuntu3.6+esm1"]},{"source":"osv","ecosystem":"Ubuntu:Pro:FIPS-updates:20.04:LTS","package":"openssl","ranges":[{"type":"ECOSYSTEM","events":[{"introduced":"0"},{"fixed":"1.1.1f-1ubuntu2.fips.18"}]}],"versions":["1.1.1f-1ubuntu2.fips.7","1.1.1f-1ubuntu2.fips.7.2","1.1.1f-1ubuntu2.fips.12","1.1.1f-1ubuntu2.fips.13","1.1.1f-1ubuntu2.fips.13.1","1.1.1f-1ubuntu2.fips.16","1.1.1f-1ubuntu2.fips.17"]},{"source":"osv","ecosystem":"Ubuntu:Pro:FIPS:20.04:LTS","package":"openssl","ranges":[{"type":"ECOSYSTEM","events":[{"introduced":"0"}]}],"versions":["1.1.1f-1ubuntu2.fips.2.8","1.1.1f-1ubuntu2.fips.7.1"]},{"source":"osv","ecosystem":"Ubuntu:22.04:LTS","package":"edk2","ranges":[{"type":"ECOSYSTEM","events":[{"introduced":"0"},{"fixed":"2022.02-3ubuntu0.22.04.4"}]}],"versions":["2021.08~rc0-2","2021.08-3","2021.11~rc1-1","2021.11-1","2021.11-2","2022.02~rc1-1","2022.02~rc1-1ubuntu1","2022.02-1","2022.02-2","2022.02-3","2022.02-3ubuntu0.22.04.1","2022.02-3ubuntu0.22.04.2","2022.02-3ubuntu0.22.04.3"]},{"source":"osv","ecosystem":"Ubuntu:22.04:LTS","package":"openssl","ranges":[{"type":"ECOSYSTEM","events":[{"introduced":"0"},{"fixed":"3.0.2-0ubuntu1.9"}]}],"versions":["1.1.1l-1ubuntu1","3.0.0-1ubuntu1","3.0.1-0ubuntu1","3.0.2-0ubuntu1","3.0.2-0ubuntu1.1","3.0.2-0ubuntu1.2","3.0.2-0ubuntu1.4","3.0.2-0ubuntu1.5","3.0.2-0ubuntu1.6","3.0.2-0ubuntu1.7","3.0.2-0ubuntu1.8"]},{"source":"osv","ecosystem":"Ubuntu:Pro:22.04:LTS","package":"nodejs","ranges":[{"type":"ECOSYSTEM","events":[{"introduced":"0"}]}],"versions":["12.22.5~dfsg-5ubuntu1","12.22.7~dfsg-2ubuntu1","12.22.7~dfsg-2ubuntu3","12.22.9~dfsg-1ubuntu2","12.22.9~dfsg-1ubuntu3","12.22.9~dfsg-1ubuntu3.1","12.22.9~dfsg-1ubuntu3.2","12.22.9~dfsg-1ubuntu3.3","12.22.9~dfsg-1ubuntu3.4","12.22.9~dfsg-1ubuntu3.5","12.22.9~dfsg-1ubuntu3.6","12.22.9~dfsg-1ubuntu3.6+esm2"]},{"source":"osv","ecosystem":"Ubuntu:22.04:LTS","package":"edk2","ranges":[{"type":"ECOSYSTEM","events":[{"introduced":"0"},{"fixed":"2022.02-3ubuntu0.22.04.4"}]}],"versions":["2021.08~rc0-2","2021.08-3","2021.11~rc1-1","2021.11-1","2021.11-2","2022.02~rc1-1","2022.02~rc1-1ubuntu1","2022.02-1","2022.02-2","2022.02-3","2022.02-3ubuntu0.22.04.1","2022.02-3ubuntu0.22.04.2","2022.02-3ubuntu0.22.04.3"],"bundled":30},{"source":"osv","ecosystem":"Ubuntu:24.04:LTS","package":"edk2","ranges":[{"type":"ECOSYSTEM","events":[{"introduced":"0"},{"fixed":"2024.02-2ubuntu0.6"}]}],"versions":["2023.05-2","2023.11-2","2023.11-3","2023.11-4","2023.11-5","2023.11-6","2023.11-8","2024.02-1","2024.02-2","2024.02-2ubuntu0.1","2024.02-2ubuntu0.3","2024.02-2ubuntu0.4","2024.02-2ubuntu0.5"],"bundled":30},{"source":"osv","ecosystem":"openSUSE:Tumbleweed","package":"openssl-1_0_0","ranges":[{"type":"ECOSYSTEM","events":[{"introduced":"0"},{"fixed":"1.0.2u-15.1"}]}],"bundled":2},{"source":"osv","ecosystem":"openSUSE:Tumbleweed","package":"openssl-1_1","ranges":[{"type":"ECOSYSTEM","events":[{"introduced":"0"},{"fixed":"1.1.1t-3.1"}]}],"bundled":2},{"source":"osv","ecosystem":"openSUSE:Tumbleweed","package":"openssl-3","ranges":[{"type":"ECOSYSTEM","events":[{"introduced":"0"},{"fixed":"3.1.1-1.1"}]}],"bundled":5}],"products":[{"vendor":"openssl","product":"openssl"},{"vendor":"siemens","product":"simatic s7-1500 cpu 1518-4 pn/dp mfp"},{"vendor":"siemens","product":"simatic s7-1500 cpu 1518f-4 pn/dp mfp"},{"vendor":"siemens","product":"simatic s7-1500 tm mfp - gnu/linux subsystem"},{"vendor":"siemens","product":"siplus s7-1500 cpu 1518-4 pn/dp mfp"}],"references":[{"url":"https://www.openssl.org/news/secadv/20230328.txt","tags":["vendor-advisory","x_transferred","Vendor Advisory","advisory","web","article","report"]},{"url":"https://git.openssl.org/gitweb/?p=openssl.git;a=commitdiff;h=facfb1ab745646e97a1920977ae4a9965ea61d5c","tags":["patch","x_transferred","Mailing List","Patch","fix","web"]},{"url":"https://git.openssl.org/gitweb/?p=openssl.git;a=commitdiff;h=1dd43e0709fece299b15208f36cc7c76209ba0bb","tags":["patch","x_transferred","Mailing List","Patch","fix","web"]},{"url":"https://git.openssl.org/gitweb/?p=openssl.git;a=commitdiff;h=b013765abfa80036dc779dd0e50602c57bb3bf95","tags":["patch","x_transferred","Mailing List","Patch","fix","web"]},{"url":"https://git.openssl.org/gitweb/?p=openssl.git;a=commitdiff;h=10325176f3d3e98c6e2b3bf5ab1e3b334de6947a","tags":["patch","x_transferred","Broken Link","fix","web"]},{"url":"https://security.netapp.com/advisory/ntap-20230414-0001/","tags":["x_transferred","advisory","web"]},{"url":"https://www.debian.org/security/2023/dsa-5417","tags":["x_transferred","advisory","web"]},{"url":"https://lists.debian.org/debian-lts-announce/2023/06/msg00011.html","tags":["x_transferred","web"]},{"url":"https://security.gentoo.org/glsa/202402-08","tags":["x_transferred","advisory","web"]},{"url":"https://cert-portal.siemens.com/productcert/html/ssa-794697.html","tags":["web"]},{"url":"https://cert-portal.siemens.com/productcert/html/ssa-398330.html","tags":["web"]},{"url":"https://cert-portal.siemens.com/productcert/html/ssa-556635.html","tags":["web"]},{"url":"https://cert-portal.siemens.com/productcert/html/ssa-879734.html","tags":["web"]},{"url":"https://cert-portal.siemens.com/productcert/html/ssa-625862.html","tags":["web"]},{"url":"https://cert-portal.siemens.com/productcert/html/ssa-337522.html","tags":["web"]},{"url":"https://cert-portal.siemens.com/productcert/html/ssa-341067.html","tags":["web"]},{"url":"https://cert-portal.siemens.com/productcert/html/ssa-769027.html","tags":["web"]},{"url":"https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2023-0465","tags":["web","advisory"]},{"url":"https://security.netapp.com/advisory/ntap-20230414-0001","tags":["web"]},{"url":"https://github.com/advisories/GHSA-77f3-6546-6rj7","tags":["web"]},{"url":"https://security.alpinelinux.org/vuln/CVE-2023-0465","tags":["advisory"]},{"url":"https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2023:3722","tags":["advisory"]},{"url":"https://access.redhat.com/security/cve/CVE-2023-0464","tags":["report"]},{"url":"https://access.redhat.com/security/cve/CVE-2023-0465","tags":["report"]},{"url":"https://access.redhat.com/security/cve/CVE-2023-0466","tags":["report"]},{"url":"https://access.redhat.com/security/cve/CVE-2023-1255","tags":["report"]},{"url":"https://access.redhat.com/security/cve/CVE-2023-2650","tags":["report"]},{"url":"https://bugzilla.redhat.com/2181082","tags":["report"]},{"url":"https://bugzilla.redhat.com/2182561","tags":["report"]},{"url":"https://bugzilla.redhat.com/2182565","tags":["report"]},{"url":"https://bugzilla.redhat.com/2188461","tags":["report"]},{"url":"https://bugzilla.redhat.com/2207947","tags":["report"]},{"url":"https://errata.almalinux.org/9/ALSA-2023-3722.html","tags":["advisory"]},{"url":"https://docs.bell-sw.com/security/cves/CVE-2023-0465","tags":["advisory"]},{"url":"https://github.com/CVEProject/cvelistV5/tree/main/cves/2023/0xxx/CVE-2023-0465.json","tags":["advisory"]},{"url":"https://security-tracker.debian.org/tracker/CVE-2023-0465","tags":["advisory"]},{"url":"https://advisories.mageia.org/MGASA-2023-0130.html","tags":["advisory"]},{"url":"https://bugs.mageia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=31526","tags":["report"]},{"url":"https://www.openssl.org/news/secadv/20230207.txt","tags":["web"]},{"url":"https://www.debian.org/security/2023/dsa-5343","tags":["web"]},{"url":"https://ubuntu.com/security/notices/USN-5844-1","tags":["advisory"]},{"url":"https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-announce@lists.fedoraproject.org/thread/RGMDA2QI6RIJSJF3FDWES76ORE53ELXX/","tags":["web"]},{"url":"https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-announce@lists.fedoraproject.org/thread/MGJS3DWIQT3W4V6WXNE2IHFLOKIFL22G/","tags":["web"]},{"url":"https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2023:1405","tags":["web"]},{"url":"https://www.openssl.org/news/secadv/20230322.txt","tags":["web","article"]},{"url":"https://www.openeuler.org/en/security/safety-bulletin/detail.html?id=openEuler-SA-2023-1207","tags":["advisory"]},{"url":"https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2023-0464","tags":["advisory"]},{"url":"https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2023-0466","tags":["advisory"]},{"url":"https://www.openeuler.org/en/security/safety-bulletin/detail.html?id=openEuler-SA-2024-1134","tags":["advisory"]},{"url":"https://www.openeuler.org/en/security/safety-bulletin/detail.html?id=openEuler-SA-2024-1135","tags":["advisory"]},{"url":"https://www.openeuler.org/en/security/safety-bulletin/detail.html?id=openEuler-SA-2024-1136","tags":["advisory"]},{"url":"https://www.openeuler.org/en/security/safety-bulletin/detail.html?id=openEuler-SA-2024-1137","tags":["advisory"]},{"url":"https://www.openeuler.org/en/security/safety-bulletin/detail.html?id=openEuler-SA-2024-1138","tags":["advisory"]},{"url":"https://www.openeuler.org/en/security/safety-bulletin/detail.html?id=openEuler-SA-2024-1168","tags":["advisory"]},{"url":"https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2023-44487","tags":["advisory"]},{"url":"https://www.openeuler.org/en/security/safety-bulletin/detail.html?id=openEuler-SA-2024-1222","tags":["advisory"]},{"url":"https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2023-2650","tags":["advisory"]},{"url":"https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2023-3446","tags":["advisory"]},{"url":"https://www.openeuler.org/en/security/safety-bulletin/detail.html?id=openEuler-SA-2024-1223","tags":["advisory"]},{"url":"https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-0727","tags":["advisory"]},{"url":"https://www.openeuler.org/en/security/safety-bulletin/detail.html?id=openEuler-SA-2024-1224","tags":["advisory"]},{"url":"https://www.openeuler.org/en/security/safety-bulletin/detail.html?id=openEuler-SA-2024-1225","tags":["advisory"]},{"url":"https://www.openeuler.org/en/security/safety-bulletin/detail.html?id=openEuler-SA-2024-1226","tags":["advisory"]},{"url":"https://www.openeuler.org/en/security/safety-bulletin/detail.html?id=openEuler-SA-2024-1227","tags":["advisory"]},{"url":"https://www.openeuler.org/en/security/safety-bulletin/detail.html?id=openEuler-SA-2024-1238","tags":["advisory"]},{"url":"https://access.redhat.com/security/updates/classification/#moderate","tags":["article"]},{"url":"https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2175860","tags":["report"]},{"url":"https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2175864","tags":["report"]},{"url":"https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2175868","tags":["report"]},{"url":"https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2175873","tags":["report"]},{"url":"https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2178029","tags":["report"]},{"url":"https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2178030","tags":["report"]},{"url":"https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2178034","tags":["report"]},{"url":"https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2178039","tags":["report"]},{"url":"https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2178137","tags":["report"]},{"url":"https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2179379","tags":["report"]},{"url":"https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2181082","tags":["report"]},{"url":"https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2182561","tags":["report"]},{"url":"https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2182565","tags":["report"]},{"url":"https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2188046","tags":["report"]},{"url":"https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2188052","tags":["report"]},{"url":"https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2188461","tags":["report"]},{"url":"https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2207947","tags":["report"]},{"url":"https://security.access.redhat.com/data/csaf/v2/advisories/2023/rhsa-2023_3722.json","tags":["advisory"]},{"url":"https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-0464","tags":["advisory"]},{"url":"https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-0465","tags":["advisory","report"]},{"url":"https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-0466","tags":["advisory"]},{"url":"https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-1255","tags":["advisory"]},{"url":"https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2023-1255","tags":["advisory"]},{"url":"https://www.openssl.org/news/secadv/20230420.txt","tags":["article"]},{"url":"https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-2650","tags":["advisory"]},{"url":"https://www.openssl.org/news/secadv/20230530.txt","tags":["article"]},{"url":"https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2023:7622","tags":["advisory"]},{"url":"https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2224962","tags":["report"]},{"url":"https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2227852","tags":["report"]},{"url":"https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2235370","tags":["report"]},{"url":"https://security.access.redhat.com/data/csaf/v2/advisories/2023/rhsa-2023_7622.json","tags":["advisory"]},{"url":"https://access.redhat.com/security/cve/CVE-2023-3446","tags":["report"]},{"url":"https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-3446","tags":["advisory"]},{"url":"https://www.openssl.org/news/secadv/20230719.txt","tags":["article"]},{"url":"https://access.redhat.com/security/cve/CVE-2023-3817","tags":["report"]},{"url":"https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-3817","tags":["advisory"]},{"url":"https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2023-3817","tags":["advisory"]},{"url":"https://www.openssl.org/news/secadv/20230731.txt","tags":["article"]},{"url":"https://access.redhat.com/security/cve/CVE-2023-41080","tags":["report"]},{"url":"https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-41080","tags":["advisory"]},{"url":"https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2023-41080","tags":["advisory"]},{"url":"https://lists.apache.org/thread/71wvwprtx2j2m54fovq9zr7gbm2wow2f","tags":["article"]},{"url":"https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2023:7625","tags":["advisory"]},{"url":"https://access.redhat.com/security/updates/classification/#important","tags":["article"]},{"url":"https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2238847","tags":["report"]},{"url":"https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2239135","tags":["report"]},{"url":"https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2241933","tags":["report"]},{"url":"https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2241938","tags":["report"]},{"url":"https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2243877","tags":["report"]},{"url":"https://security.access.redhat.com/data/csaf/v2/advisories/2023/rhsa-2023_7625.json","tags":["advisory"]},{"url":"https://access.redhat.com/security/cve/CVE-2023-38039","tags":["report"]},{"url":"https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-38039","tags":["advisory"]},{"url":"https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2023-38039","tags":["advisory"]},{"url":"https://curl.se/docs/CVE-2023-38039.html","tags":["article"]},{"url":"https://access.redhat.com/security/cve/CVE-2023-38545","tags":["report"]},{"url":"https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-38545","tags":["advisory"]},{"url":"https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2023-38545","tags":["advisory"]},{"url":"https://curl.se/docs/CVE-2023-38545.html","tags":["article"]},{"url":"https://access.redhat.com/security/cve/CVE-2023-38546","tags":["report"]},{"url":"https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2024:2101","tags":["article"]},{"url":"https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-38546","tags":["advisory"]},{"url":"https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2023-38546","tags":["advisory"]},{"url":"https://curl.se/docs/CVE-2023-38546.html","tags":["article"]},{"url":"https://access.redhat.com/security/cve/CVE-2023-41081","tags":["report"]},{"url":"https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-41081","tags":["advisory"]},{"url":"https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2023-41081","tags":["advisory"]},{"url":"https://lists.apache.org/thread/rd1r26w7271jyqgzr4492tooyt583d8b","tags":["article"]},{"url":"https://access.redhat.com/security/cve/CVE-2023-45802","tags":["report"]},{"url":"https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-45802","tags":["advisory"]},{"url":"https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2023-45802","tags":["advisory"]},{"url":"https://httpd.apache.org/security/vulnerabilities_24.html","tags":["article"]},{"url":"https://www.suse.com/support/update/announcement/2023/suse-su-20231790-1/","tags":["advisory"]},{"url":"https://bugzilla.suse.com/1209624","tags":["report"]},{"url":"https://bugzilla.suse.com/1209873","tags":["report"]},{"url":"https://bugzilla.suse.com/1209878","tags":["report"]},{"url":"https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2023-0464","tags":["web"]},{"url":"https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2023-0465","tags":["web"]},{"url":"https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2023-0466","tags":["web"]},{"url":"https://www.suse.com/support/update/announcement/2023/suse-su-20231794-1/","tags":["advisory"]},{"url":"https://www.suse.com/support/update/announcement/2023/suse-su-20231898-1/","tags":["advisory"]},{"url":"https://bugzilla.suse.com/1210060","tags":["report"]},{"url":"https://www.suse.com/support/update/announcement/2023/suse-su-20231907-1/","tags":["advisory"]},{"url":"https://www.suse.com/support/update/announcement/2023/suse-su-20231908-1/","tags":["advisory"]},{"url":"https://www.suse.com/support/update/announcement/2023/suse-su-20231911-1/","tags":["advisory"]},{"url":"https://www.suse.com/support/update/announcement/2023/suse-su-20231912-1/","tags":["advisory"]},{"url":"https://www.suse.com/support/update/announcement/2023/suse-su-20231914-1/","tags":["advisory"]},{"url":"https://www.suse.com/support/update/announcement/2023/suse-su-20231922-1/","tags":["advisory"]},{"url":"https://www.suse.com/support/update/announcement/2023/suse-su-20231926-1/","tags":["advisory"]},{"url":"https://www.suse.com/support/update/announcement/2023/suse-su-20231960-1/","tags":["advisory"]},{"url":"https://ubuntu.com/security/CVE-2023-0465","tags":["report"]},{"url":"https://ubuntu.com/security/notices/USN-6039-1","tags":["advisory"]},{"url":"https://ubuntu.com/security/notices/USN-7894-1","tags":["advisory"]},{"url":"https://ubuntu.com/security/CVE-2021-3712","tags":["report"]},{"url":"https://ubuntu.com/security/CVE-2022-0778","tags":["report"]},{"url":"https://ubuntu.com/security/CVE-2022-4304","tags":["report"]},{"url":"https://ubuntu.com/security/CVE-2022-4450","tags":["report"]},{"url":"https://ubuntu.com/security/CVE-2023-0215","tags":["report"]},{"url":"https://ubuntu.com/security/CVE-2023-0286","tags":["report"]},{"url":"https://ubuntu.com/security/CVE-2023-0464","tags":["report"]},{"url":"https://ubuntu.com/security/CVE-2023-0466","tags":["report"]},{"url":"https://ubuntu.com/security/CVE-2023-2650","tags":["report"]},{"url":"https://ubuntu.com/security/CVE-2023-3446","tags":["report"]},{"url":"https://ubuntu.com/security/CVE-2023-3817","tags":["report"]},{"url":"https://ubuntu.com/security/CVE-2023-5678","tags":["report"]},{"url":"https://ubuntu.com/security/CVE-2023-6237","tags":["report"]},{"url":"https://ubuntu.com/security/CVE-2023-45236","tags":["report"]},{"url":"https://ubuntu.com/security/CVE-2023-45237","tags":["report"]},{"url":"https://ubuntu.com/security/CVE-2024-0727","tags":["report"]},{"url":"https://ubuntu.com/security/CVE-2024-1298","tags":["report"]},{"url":"https://ubuntu.com/security/CVE-2024-2511","tags":["report"]},{"url":"https://ubuntu.com/security/CVE-2024-4741","tags":["report"]},{"url":"https://ubuntu.com/security/CVE-2024-5535","tags":["report"]},{"url":"https://ubuntu.com/security/CVE-2024-6119","tags":["report"]},{"url":"https://ubuntu.com/security/CVE-2024-9143","tags":["report"]},{"url":"https://ubuntu.com/security/CVE-2024-13176","tags":["report"]},{"url":"https://ubuntu.com/security/CVE-2024-38796","tags":["report"]},{"url":"https://ubuntu.com/security/CVE-2024-38797","tags":["report"]},{"url":"https://ubuntu.com/security/CVE-2024-38805","tags":["report"]},{"url":"https://ubuntu.com/security/CVE-2025-2295","tags":["report"]},{"url":"https://ubuntu.com/security/CVE-2025-3770","tags":["report"]},{"url":"https://ubuntu.com/security/CVE-2025-9232","tags":["report"]},{"url":"","tags":["advisory"]},{"url":"https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2023-1255","tags":["web"]},{"url":"https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2023-2650","tags":["web"]}],"sources":{"cve":[{"id":"CVE-2023-0465","title":"Invalid certificate policies in leaf certificates are silently ignored","description":"Applications that use a non-default option when verifying certificates may be\nvulnerable to an attack from a malicious CA to circumvent certain checks.\n\nInvalid certificate policies in leaf certificates are silently ignored by\nOpenSSL and other certificate policy checks are skipped for that certificate.\nA malicious CA could use this to deliberately assert invalid certificate policies\nin order to circumvent policy checking on the certificate altogether.\n\nPolicy processing is disabled by default but can be enabled by passing\nthe `-policy' argument to the command line utilities or by calling the\n`X509_VERIFY_PARAM_set1_policies()' function.","status":"published","published":"2023-03-28T14:30:39.707Z","modified":"2026-10-14T19:54:20.864Z","cvss":[{"version":"3.1","score":5.3,"vector":"CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N","level":"medium","assessor":"adp"}],"cwes":["CWE-295"],"updated_at":"2026-11-02T14:35:34.923818Z"}],"euvd":[{"id":"EUVD-2023-12519","description":"Applications that use a non-default option when verifying certificates may be\nvulnerable to an attack from a malicious CA to circumvent certain checks.\n\nInvalid certificate policies in leaf certificates are silently ignored by\nOpenSSL and other certificate policy checks are skipped for that certificate.\nA malicious CA could use this to deliberately assert invalid certificate policies\nin order to circumvent policy checking on the certificate altogether.\n\nPolicy processing is disabled by default but can be enabled by passing\nthe `-policy' argument to the command line utilities or by calling the\n`X509_VERIFY_PARAM_set1_policies()' function.","status":"published","published":"2023-03-28T14:30:39Z","modified":"2026-10-14T19:54:20Z","cvss":[{"version":"3.1","score":5.3,"vector":"CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N","level":"medium"}],"updated_at":"2026-11-02T17:27:12.80866Z"}],"ghsa":[{"id":"GHSA-77f3-6546-6rj7","title":"Applications that use a non-default option when verifying certificates may be vulnerable to an...","description":"Applications that use a non-default option when verifying certificates may be vulnerable to an attack from a malicious CA to circumvent certain checks. Invalid certificate policies in leaf certificates are silently ignored by OpenSSL and other certificate policy checks are skipped for that certificate. A malicious CA could use this to deliberately assert invalid certificate policies in order to circumvent policy checking on the certificate altogether. Policy processing is disabled by default but can be enabled by passing the `-policy' argument to the command line utilities or by calling the `X509_VERIFY_PARAM_set1_policies()' function.","status":"published","published":"2023-03-28T15:30:16Z","modified":"2026-10-14T21:31:40Z","cvss":[{"version":"3.1","score":5.3,"vector":"CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N","level":"medium"}],"cwes":["CWE-295"],"updated_at":"2026-11-02T15:13:28.606179Z"}],"nvd":[{"id":"CVE-2023-0465","description":"Applications that use a non-default option when verifying certificates may be\nvulnerable to an attack from a malicious CA to circumvent certain checks.\n\nInvalid certificate policies in leaf certificates are silently ignored by\nOpenSSL and other certificate policy checks are skipped for that certificate.\nA malicious CA could use this to deliberately assert invalid certificate policies\nin order to circumvent policy checking on the certificate altogether.\n\nPolicy processing is disabled by default but can be enabled by passing\nthe `-policy' argument to the command line utilities or by calling the\n`X509_VERIFY_PARAM_set1_policies()' function.","status":"published","published":"2023-03-28T15:15:06.82Z","modified":"2026-10-14T20:17:23.747Z","cvss":[{"version":"3.1","score":5.3,"vector":"CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N","level":"medium","assessor":"primary"},{"version":"3.1","score":5.3,"vector":"CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N","level":"medium","assessor":"secondary"}],"cwes":["CWE-295"],"updated_at":"2026-11-02T14:07:51.883939Z"}],"osv":[{"id":"ALPINE-CVE-2023-0465","description":"Applications that use a non-default option when verifying certificates may be\nvulnerable to an attack from a malicious CA to circumvent certain checks.\n\nInvalid certificate policies in leaf certificates are silently ignored by\nOpenSSL and other certificate policy checks are skipped for that certificate.\nA malicious CA could use this to deliberately assert invalid certificate policies\nin order to circumvent policy checking on the certificate altogether.\n\nPolicy processing is disabled by default but can be enabled by passing\nthe `-policy' argument to the command line utilities or by calling the\n`X509_VERIFY_PARAM_set1_policies()' function.","status":"published","published":"2023-03-28T15:15:06.82Z","modified":"2026-11-03T06:32:39.852867717Z","cvss":[{"version":"3.1","score":5.3,"vector":"CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N","level":"medium"}],"updated_at":"2026-11-03T07:17:02.90744Z"},{"id":"AZL-25937","title":"CVE-2023-0465 affecting package openssl for versions less than 1.1.1k-23","description":"Applications that use a non-default option when verifying certificates may be\nvulnerable to an attack from a malicious CA to circumvent certain checks.\n\nInvalid certificate policies in leaf certificates are silently ignored by\nOpenSSL and other certificate policy checks are skipped for that certificate.\nA malicious CA could use this to deliberately assert invalid certificate policies\nin order to circumvent policy checking on the certificate altogether.\n\nPolicy processing is disabled by default but can be enabled by passing\nthe `-policy' argument to the command line utilities or by calling the\n`X509_VERIFY_PARAM_set1_policies()' function.","status":"published","published":"2023-03-28T15:15:06Z","modified":"2026-04-21T04:23:23.129498Z","cvss":[{"version":"3.1","score":5.3,"vector":"CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N","level":"medium"}],"updated_at":"2026-11-02T15:28:03.093433Z"},{"id":"AZL-27241","title":"CVE-2023-0465 affecting package kata-containers-cc for versions less than 0.4.1-2","description":"Applications that use a non-default option when verifying certificates may be\nvulnerable to an attack from a malicious CA to circumvent certain checks.\n\nInvalid certificate policies in leaf certificates are silently ignored by\nOpenSSL and other certificate policy checks are skipped for that certificate.\nA malicious CA could use this to deliberately assert invalid certificate policies\nin order to circumvent policy checking on the certificate altogether.\n\nPolicy processing is disabled by default but can be enabled by passing\nthe `-policy' argument to the command line utilities or by calling the\n`X509_VERIFY_PARAM_set1_policies()' function.","status":"published","published":"2023-03-28T15:15:06Z","modified":"2026-04-21T04:24:09.409205Z","cvss":[{"version":"3.1","score":5.3,"vector":"CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N","level":"medium"}],"updated_at":"2026-11-02T15:28:03.093433Z"},{"id":"AZL-31145","title":"CVE-2023-0465 affecting package edk2 for versions less than 20230301gitf80f052277c8-37","description":"Applications that use a non-default option when verifying certificates may be\nvulnerable to an attack from a malicious CA to circumvent certain checks.\n\nInvalid certificate policies in leaf certificates are silently ignored by\nOpenSSL and other certificate policy checks are skipped for that certificate.\nA malicious CA could use this to deliberately assert invalid certificate policies\nin order to circumvent policy checking on the certificate altogether.\n\nPolicy processing is disabled by default but can be enabled by passing\nthe `-policy' argument to the command line utilities or by calling the\n`X509_VERIFY_PARAM_set1_policies()' function.","status":"published","published":"2023-03-28T15:15:06Z","modified":"2026-04-21T04:26:06.454698Z","cvss":[{"version":"3.1","score":5.3,"vector":"CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N","level":"medium"}],"updated_at":"2026-11-02T15:28:03.46006Z"},{"id":"AZL-34663","title":"CVE-2023-0465 affecting package edk2 for versions less than 20230301gitf80f052277c8-37","description":"Applications that use a non-default option when verifying certificates may be\nvulnerable to an attack from a malicious CA to circumvent certain checks.\n\nInvalid certificate policies in leaf certificates are silently ignored by\nOpenSSL and other certificate policy checks are skipped for that certificate.\nA malicious CA could use this to deliberately assert invalid certificate policies\nin order to circumvent policy checking on the certificate altogether.\n\nPolicy processing is disabled by default but can be enabled by passing\nthe `-policy' argument to the command line utilities or by calling the\n`X509_VERIFY_PARAM_set1_policies()' function.","status":"published","published":"2023-03-28T15:15:06Z","modified":"2026-04-21T04:34:18.68672Z","cvss":[{"version":"3.1","score":5.3,"vector":"CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N","level":"medium"}],"updated_at":"2026-11-02T15:28:03.821827Z"},{"id":"AZL-37716","title":"CVE-2023-0465 affecting package hvloader for versions less than 1.0.1-9","description":"Applications that use a non-default option when verifying certificates may be\nvulnerable to an attack from a malicious CA to circumvent certain checks.\n\nInvalid certificate policies in leaf certificates are silently ignored by\nOpenSSL and other certificate policy checks are skipped for that certificate.\nA malicious CA could use this to deliberately assert invalid certificate policies\nin order to circumvent policy checking on the certificate altogether.\n\nPolicy processing is disabled by default but can be enabled by passing\nthe `-policy' argument to the command line utilities or by calling the\n`X509_VERIFY_PARAM_set1_policies()' function.","status":"published","published":"2023-03-28T15:15:06Z","modified":"2026-04-21T04:28:23.359584Z","cvss":[{"version":"3.1","score":5.3,"vector":"CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N","level":"medium"}],"updated_at":"2026-11-02T15:28:04.608733Z"},{"id":"BELL-CVE-2023-0465","title":"CVE-2023-0465 does not affect BellSoft software","status":"withdrawn","published":"2023-08-31T12:15:30.725303Z","modified":"2026-01-26T09:48:22.290065Z","cvss":[{"version":"3.1","score":5.3,"vector":"CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N","level":"medium"}],"updated_at":"2026-11-02T15:28:17.151188Z"},{"id":"CVE-2023-0465","title":"Invalid certificate policies in leaf certificates are silently ignored","description":"Applications that use a non-default option when verifying certificates may be\nvulnerable to an attack from a malicious CA to circumvent certain checks.\n\nInvalid certificate policies in leaf certificates are silently ignored by\nOpenSSL and other certificate policy checks are skipped for that certificate.\nA malicious CA could use this to deliberately assert invalid certificate policies\nin order to circumvent policy checking on the certificate altogether.\n\nPolicy processing is disabled by default but can be enabled by passing\nthe `-policy' argument to the command line utilities or by calling the\n`X509_VERIFY_PARAM_set1_policies()' function.","status":"published","published":"2023-03-28T14:30:39.707Z","modified":"2026-11-11T13:28:44.298261742Z","cvss":[{"version":"3.1","score":5.3,"vector":"CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N","level":"medium"}],"updated_at":"2026-11-11T11:06:23.720473Z"},{"id":"DEBIAN-CVE-2023-0465","description":"Applications that use a non-default option when verifying certificates may be vulnerable to an attack from a malicious CA to circumvent certain checks.  Invalid certificate policies in leaf certificates are silently ignored by OpenSSL and other certificate policy checks are skipped for that certificate. A malicious CA could use this to deliberately assert invalid certificate policies in order to circumvent policy checking on the certificate altogether.  Policy processing is disabled by default but can be enabled by passing the `-policy' argument to the command line utilities or by calling the `X509_VERIFY_PARAM_set1_policies()' function.","status":"published","published":"2023-03-28T15:15:06.82Z","modified":"2026-10-26T18:01:18.029396258Z","cvss":[{"version":"3.1","score":5.3,"vector":"CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N","level":"medium"}],"updated_at":"2026-11-02T15:45:39.029012Z"},{"id":"JLSEC-2026-236","title":"Applications that use a non-default option when verifying certificates may be vulnerable to an...","description":"Applications that use a non-default option when verifying certificates may be\nvulnerable to an attack from a malicious CA to circumvent certain checks.\n\nInvalid certificate policies in leaf certificates are silently ignored by\nOpenSSL and other certificate policy checks are skipped for that certificate.\nA malicious CA could use this to deliberately assert invalid certificate policies\nin order to circumvent policy checking on the certificate altogether.\n\nPolicy processing is disabled by default but can be enabled by passing\nthe `-policy` argument to the command line utilities or by calling the `X509_VERIFY_PARAM_set1_policies()` function.","status":"published","published":"2026-04-27T18:33:55.942Z","modified":"2026-07-25T18:24:07.817371356Z","cvss":[{"version":"3.1","score":5.3,"vector":"CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N","level":"medium"}],"updated_at":"2026-11-02T15:47:18.573531Z"},{"id":"OESA-2023-1207","title":"openssl security update","description":"OpenSSL is a robust, commercial-grade, and full-featured toolkit for the Transport Layer Security (TLS) and Secure Sockets Layer (SSL) protocols.\r\n\r\nSecurity Fix(es):\r\n\r\nA security vulnerability has been identified in all supported versions of OpenSSL related to the verification of X.509 certificate chains that include policy constraints. Attackers may be able to exploit this vulnerability by creating a malicious certificate chain that triggers exponential use of computational resources, leading to a denial-of-service (DoS) attack on affected systems. Policy processing is disabled by default but can be enabled by passing the `-policy\u0026apos; argument to the command line utilities or by calling the `X509_VERIFY_PARAM_set1_policies()\u0026apos; function.(CVE-2023-0464)\r\n\r\nApplications that use a non-default option when verifying certificates may be vulnerable to an attack from a malicious CA to circumvent certain checks. Invalid certificate policies in leaf certificates are silently ignored by OpenSSL and other certificate policy checks are skipped for that certificate. A malicious CA could use this to deliberately assert invalid certificate policies in order to circumvent policy checking on the certificate altogether. Policy processing is disabled by default but can be enabled by passing the `-policy\u0026apos; argument to the command line utilities or by calling the `X509_VERIFY_PARAM_set1_policies()\u0026apos; function.(CVE-2023-0465)\r\n\r\nThe function X509_VERIFY_PARAM_add0_policy() is documented to implicitly enable the certificate policy check when doing certificate verification. However the implementation of the function does not enable the check which allows certificates with invalid or incorrect policies to pass the certificate verification. As suddenly enabling the policy check could break existing deployments it was decided to keep the existing behavior of the X509_VERIFY_PARAM_add0_policy() function. Instead the applications that require OpenSSL to perform certificate policy check need to use X509_VERIFY_PARAM_set1_policies() or explicitly enable the policy check by calling X509_VERIFY_PARAM_set_flags() with the X509_V_FLAG_POLICY_CHECK flag argument. Certificate policy checks are disabled by default in OpenSSL and are not commonly used by applications.(CVE-2023-0466)","status":"published","published":"2023-04-11T11:05:40Z","modified":"2026-08-18T01:17:39.097943691Z","cvss":[{"version":"3.1","score":7.5,"vector":"CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H","level":"high"}],"updated_at":"2026-11-02T15:52:39.934788Z"},{"id":"OESA-2024-1134","title":"nodejs security update","description":"Node.js is an open-source, cross-platform, JavaScript runtime environment, it executes JavaScript code outside of a browser.\r\n\r\nSecurity Fix(es):\r\n\r\nA security vulnerability has been identified in all supported versions\r\n\r\nof OpenSSL related to the verification of X.509 certificate chains\nthat include policy constraints.  Attackers may be able to exploit this\nvulnerability by creating a malicious certificate chain that triggers\nexponential use of computational resources, leading to a denial-of-service\n(DoS) attack on affected systems.\r\n\r\nPolicy processing is disabled by default but can be enabled by passing\nthe `-policy\u0026apos; argument to the command line utilities or by calling the\n`X509_VERIFY_PARAM_set1_policies()\u0026apos; function.(CVE-2023-0464)\r\n\r\nApplications that use a non-default option when verifying certificates may be\nvulnerable to an attack from a malicious CA to circumvent certain checks.\r\n\r\nInvalid certificate policies in leaf certificates are silently ignored by\nOpenSSL and other certificate policy checks are skipped for that certificate.\nA malicious CA could use this to deliberately assert invalid certificate policies\nin order to circumvent policy checking on the certificate altogether.\r\n\r\nPolicy processing is disabled by default but can be enabled by passing\nthe `-policy\u0026apos; argument to the command line utilities or by calling the\n`X509_VERIFY_PARAM_set1_policies()\u0026apos; function.(CVE-2023-0465)","status":"published","published":"2024-02-08T11:06:35Z","modified":"2026-08-18T01:18:14.918970556Z","cvss":[{"version":"3.1","score":7.5,"vector":"CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H","level":"high"}],"updated_at":"2026-11-02T15:52:40.71472Z"},{"id":"OESA-2024-1135","title":"nodejs security update","description":"Node.js is an open-source, cross-platform, JavaScript runtime environment, it executes JavaScript code outside of a browser.\r\n\r\nSecurity Fix(es):\r\n\r\nA security vulnerability has been identified in all supported versions\r\n\r\nof OpenSSL related to the verification of X.509 certificate chains\nthat include policy constraints.  Attackers may be able to exploit this\nvulnerability by creating a malicious certificate chain that triggers\nexponential use of computational resources, leading to a denial-of-service\n(DoS) attack on affected systems.\r\n\r\nPolicy processing is disabled by default but can be enabled by passing\nthe `-policy\u0026apos; argument to the command line utilities or by calling the\n`X509_VERIFY_PARAM_set1_policies()\u0026apos; function.(CVE-2023-0464)\r\n\r\nApplications that use a non-default option when verifying certificates may be\nvulnerable to an attack from a malicious CA to circumvent certain checks.\r\n\r\nInvalid certificate policies in leaf certificates are silently ignored by\nOpenSSL and other certificate policy checks are skipped for that certificate.\nA malicious CA could use this to deliberately assert invalid certificate policies\nin order to circumvent policy checking on the certificate altogether.\r\n\r\nPolicy processing is disabled by default but can be enabled by passing\nthe `-policy\u0026apos; argument to the command line utilities or by calling the\n`X509_VERIFY_PARAM_set1_policies()\u0026apos; function.(CVE-2023-0465)","status":"published","published":"2024-02-08T11:06:35Z","modified":"2026-08-18T01:18:14.93561336Z","cvss":[{"version":"3.1","score":7.5,"vector":"CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H","level":"high"}],"updated_at":"2026-11-02T15:52:40.71472Z"},{"id":"OESA-2024-1136","title":"nodejs security update","description":"Node.js is an open-source, cross-platform, JavaScript runtime environment, it executes JavaScript code outside of a browser.\r\n\r\nSecurity Fix(es):\r\n\r\nA security vulnerability has been identified in all supported versions\r\n\r\nof OpenSSL related to the verification of X.509 certificate chains\nthat include policy constraints.  Attackers may be able to exploit this\nvulnerability by creating a malicious certificate chain that triggers\nexponential use of computational resources, leading to a denial-of-service\n(DoS) attack on affected systems.\r\n\r\nPolicy processing is disabled by default but can be enabled by passing\nthe `-policy\u0026apos; argument to the command line utilities or by calling the\n`X509_VERIFY_PARAM_set1_policies()\u0026apos; function.(CVE-2023-0464)\r\n\r\nApplications that use a non-default option when verifying certificates may be\nvulnerable to an attack from a malicious CA to circumvent certain checks.\r\n\r\nInvalid certificate policies in leaf certificates are silently ignored by\nOpenSSL and other certificate policy checks are skipped for that certificate.\nA malicious CA could use this to deliberately assert invalid certificate policies\nin order to circumvent policy checking on the certificate altogether.\r\n\r\nPolicy processing is disabled by default but can be enabled by passing\nthe `-policy\u0026apos; argument to the command line utilities or by calling the\n`X509_VERIFY_PARAM_set1_policies()\u0026apos; function.(CVE-2023-0465)","status":"published","published":"2024-02-08T11:06:35Z","modified":"2026-08-18T01:18:15.085861273Z","cvss":[{"version":"3.1","score":7.5,"vector":"CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H","level":"high"}],"updated_at":"2026-11-02T15:52:40.71472Z"},{"id":"OESA-2024-1137","title":"nodejs security update","description":"Node.js is an open-source, cross-platform, JavaScript runtime environment, it executes JavaScript code outside of a browser.\r\n\r\nSecurity Fix(es):\r\n\r\nA security vulnerability has been identified in all supported versions\r\n\r\nof OpenSSL related to the verification of X.509 certificate chains\nthat include policy constraints.  Attackers may be able to exploit this\nvulnerability by creating a malicious certificate chain that triggers\nexponential use of computational resources, leading to a denial-of-service\n(DoS) attack on affected systems.\r\n\r\nPolicy processing is disabled by default but can be enabled by passing\nthe `-policy\u0026apos; argument to the command line utilities or by calling the\n`X509_VERIFY_PARAM_set1_policies()\u0026apos; function.(CVE-2023-0464)\r\n\r\nApplications that use a non-default option when verifying certificates may be\nvulnerable to an attack from a malicious CA to circumvent certain checks.\r\n\r\nInvalid certificate policies in leaf certificates are silently ignored by\nOpenSSL and other certificate policy checks are skipped for that certificate.\nA malicious CA could use this to deliberately assert invalid certificate policies\nin order to circumvent policy checking on the certificate altogether.\r\n\r\nPolicy processing is disabled by default but can be enabled by passing\nthe `-policy\u0026apos; argument to the command line utilities or by calling the\n`X509_VERIFY_PARAM_set1_policies()\u0026apos; function.(CVE-2023-0465)","status":"published","published":"2024-02-08T11:06:35Z","modified":"2026-08-18T01:18:14.822244284Z","cvss":[{"version":"3.1","score":7.5,"vector":"CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H","level":"high"}],"updated_at":"2026-11-02T15:52:40.71472Z"},{"id":"OESA-2024-1138","title":"nodejs security update","description":"Node.js is an open-source, cross-platform, JavaScript runtime environment, it executes JavaScript code outside of a browser.\r\n\r\nSecurity Fix(es):\r\n\r\nA security vulnerability has been identified in all supported versions\r\n\r\nof OpenSSL related to the verification of X.509 certificate chains\nthat include policy constraints.  Attackers may be able to exploit this\nvulnerability by creating a malicious certificate chain that triggers\nexponential use of computational resources, leading to a denial-of-service\n(DoS) attack on affected systems.\r\n\r\nPolicy processing is disabled by default but can be enabled by passing\nthe `-policy\u0026apos; argument to the command line utilities or by calling the\n`X509_VERIFY_PARAM_set1_policies()\u0026apos; function.(CVE-2023-0464)\r\n\r\nApplications that use a non-default option when verifying certificates may be\nvulnerable to an attack from a malicious CA to circumvent certain checks.\r\n\r\nInvalid certificate policies in leaf certificates are silently ignored by\nOpenSSL and other certificate policy checks are skipped for that certificate.\nA malicious CA could use this to deliberately assert invalid certificate policies\nin order to circumvent policy checking on the certificate altogether.\r\n\r\nPolicy processing is disabled by default but can be enabled by passing\nthe `-policy\u0026apos; argument to the command line utilities or by calling the\n`X509_VERIFY_PARAM_set1_policies()\u0026apos; function.(CVE-2023-0465)","status":"published","published":"2024-02-08T11:06:35Z","modified":"2026-08-18T01:18:15.535940927Z","cvss":[{"version":"3.1","score":7.5,"vector":"CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H","level":"high"}],"updated_at":"2026-11-02T15:52:40.71472Z"},{"id":"OESA-2024-1168","title":"nodejs security update","description":"Node.js is an open-source, cross-platform, JavaScript runtime environment, it executes JavaScript code outside of a browser.\r\n\r\nSecurity Fix(es):\r\n\r\nA security vulnerability has been identified in all supported versions\r\n\r\nof OpenSSL related to the verification of X.509 certificate chains\nthat include policy constraints.  Attackers may be able to exploit this\nvulnerability by creating a malicious certificate chain that triggers\nexponential use of computational resources, leading to a denial-of-service\n(DoS) attack on affected systems.\r\n\r\nPolicy processing is disabled by default but can be enabled by passing\nthe `-policy\u0026apos; argument to the command line utilities or by calling the\n`X509_VERIFY_PARAM_set1_policies()\u0026apos; function.(CVE-2023-0464)\r\n\r\nApplications that use a non-default option when verifying certificates may be\nvulnerable to an attack from a malicious CA to circumvent certain checks.\r\n\r\nInvalid certificate policies in leaf certificates are silently ignored by\nOpenSSL and other certificate policy checks are skipped for that certificate.\nA malicious CA could use this to deliberately assert invalid certificate policies\nin order to circumvent policy checking on the certificate altogether.\r\n\r\nPolicy processing is disabled by default but can be enabled by passing\nthe `-policy\u0026apos; argument to the command line utilities or by calling the\n`X509_VERIFY_PARAM_set1_policies()\u0026apos; function.(CVE-2023-0465)\r\n\r\nThe HTTP/2 protocol allows a denial of service (server resource consumption) because request cancellation can reset many streams quickly, as exploited in the wild in August through October 2023.(CVE-2023-44487)","status":"published","published":"2024-02-23T11:06:37Z","modified":"2026-08-18T01:18:15.087905378Z","cvss":[{"version":"3.1","score":7.5,"vector":"CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H","level":"high"}],"updated_at":"2026-11-02T15:52:40.71472Z"},{"id":"OESA-2024-1222","title":"shim security update","description":"Initial UEFI bootloader that handles chaining to a trusted full \\ bootloader under secure boot environments.\r\n\r\nSecurity Fix(es):\r\n\r\nApplications that use a non-default option when verifying certificates may be\nvulnerable to an attack from a malicious CA to circumvent certain checks.\r\n\r\nInvalid certificate policies in leaf certificates are silently ignored by\nOpenSSL and other certificate policy checks are skipped for that certificate.\nA malicious CA could use this to deliberately assert invalid certificate policies\nin order to circumvent policy checking on the certificate altogether.\r\n\r\nPolicy processing is disabled by default but can be enabled by passing\nthe `-policy\u0026apos; argument to the command line utilities or by calling the\n`X509_VERIFY_PARAM_set1_policies()\u0026apos; function.(CVE-2023-0465)\r\n\r\nIssue summary: Processing some specially crafted ASN.1 object identifiers or\ndata containing them may be very slow.\r\n\r\nImpact summary: Applications that use OBJ_obj2txt() directly, or use any of\nthe OpenSSL subsystems OCSP, PKCS7/SMIME, CMS, CMP/CRMF or TS with no message\nsize limit may experience notable to very long delays when processing those\nmessages, which may lead to a Denial of Service.\r\n\r\nAn OBJECT IDENTIFIER is composed of a series of numbers - sub-identifiers -\nmost of which have no size limit.  OBJ_obj2txt() may be used to translate\nan ASN.1 OBJECT IDENTIFIER given in DER encoding form (using the OpenSSL\ntype ASN1_OBJECT) to its canonical numeric text form, which are the\nsub-identifiers of the OBJECT IDENTIFIER in decimal form, separated by\nperiods.\r\n\r\nWhen one of the sub-identifiers in the OBJECT IDENTIFIER is very large\n(these are sizes that are seen as absurdly large, taking up tens or hundreds\nof KiBs), the translation to a decimal number in text may take a very long\ntime.  The time complexity is O(n^2) with \u0026apos;n\u0026apos; being the size of the\nsub-identifiers in bytes (*).\r\n\r\nWith OpenSSL 3.0, support to fetch cryptographic algorithms using names /\nidentifiers in string form was introduced.  This includes using OBJECT\nIDENTIFIERs in canonical numeric text form as identifiers for fetching\nalgorithms.\r\n\r\nSuch OBJECT IDENTIFIERs may be received through the ASN.1 structure\nAlgorithmIdentifier, which is commonly used in multiple protocols to specify\nwhat cryptographic algorithm should be used to sign or verify, encrypt or\ndecrypt, or digest passed data.\r\n\r\nApplications that call OBJ_obj2txt() directly with untrusted data are\naffected, with any version of OpenSSL.  If the use is for the mere purpose\nof display, the severity is considered low.\r\n\r\nIn OpenSSL 3.0 and newer, this affects the subsystems OCSP, PKCS7/SMIME,\nCMS, CMP/CRMF or TS.  It also impacts anything that processes X.509\ncertificates, including simple things like verifying its signature.\r\n\r\nThe impact on TLS is relatively low, because all versions of OpenSSL have a\n100KiB limit on the peer\u0026apos;s certificate chain.  Additionally, this only\nimpacts clients, or servers that have explicitly enabled client\nauthentication.\r\n\r\nIn OpenSSL 1.1.1 and 1.0.2, this only affects displaying diverse objects,\nsuch as X.509 certificates.  This is assumed to not happen in such a way\nthat it would cause a Denial of Service, so these versions are considered\nnot affected by this issue in such a way that it would be cause for concern,\nand the severity is therefore considered low.(CVE-2023-2650)\r\n\r\nIssue summary: Checking excessively long DH keys or parameters may be very slow.\r\n\r\nImpact summary: Applications that use the functions DH_check(), DH_check_ex()\nor EVP_PKEY_param_check() to check a DH key or DH parameters may experience long\ndelays. Where the key or parameters that are being checked have been obtained\nfrom an untrusted source this may lead to a Denial of Service.\r\n\r\nThe function DH_check() performs various checks on DH parameters. One of those\nchecks confirms that the modulus (\u0026apos;p\u0026apos; parameter) is not too large. Trying to use\na very large modulus is slow and OpenSSL will not normally use a modulus which\nis over 10,000 bits in length.\r\n\r\nHowever the DH_check() function checks numerous aspects of the key or parameters\nthat have been supplied. Some of those checks use the supplied modulus value\neven if it has already been found to be too large.\r\n\r\nAn application that calls DH_check() and supplies a key or parameters obtained\nfrom an untrusted source could be vulernable to a Denial of Service attack.\r\n\r\nThe function DH_check() is itself called by a number of other OpenSSL functions.\nAn application calling any of those other functions may similarly be affected.\nThe other functions affected by this are DH_check_ex() and\nEVP_PKEY_param_check().\r\n\r\nAlso vulnerable are the OpenSSL dhparam and pkeyparam command line applications\nwhen using the \u0026apos;-check\u0026apos; option.\r\n\r\nThe OpenSSL SSL/TLS implementation is not affected by this issue.\nThe OpenSSL 3.0 and 3.1 FIPS providers are not affected by this issue.(CVE-2023-3446)","status":"published","published":"2024-03-01T11:06:40Z","modified":"2026-08-18T01:18:17.530365265Z","cvss":[{"version":"3.1","score":6.5,"vector":"CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H","level":"medium"}],"updated_at":"2026-11-02T15:52:40.71472Z"},{"id":"OESA-2024-1223","title":"shim security update","description":"Initial UEFI bootloader that handles chaining to a trusted full \\ bootloader under secure boot environments.\r\n\r\nSecurity Fix(es):\r\n\r\nApplications that use a non-default option when verifying certificates may be\nvulnerable to an attack from a malicious CA to circumvent certain checks.\r\n\r\nInvalid certificate policies in leaf certificates are silently ignored by\nOpenSSL and other certificate policy checks are skipped for that certificate.\nA malicious CA could use this to deliberately assert invalid certificate policies\nin order to circumvent policy checking on the certificate altogether.\r\n\r\nPolicy processing is disabled by default but can be enabled by passing\nthe `-policy\u0026apos; argument to the command line utilities or by calling the\n`X509_VERIFY_PARAM_set1_policies()\u0026apos; function.(CVE-2023-0465)\r\n\r\nIssue summary: Processing some specially crafted ASN.1 object identifiers or\ndata containing them may be very slow.\r\n\r\nImpact summary: Applications that use OBJ_obj2txt() directly, or use any of\nthe OpenSSL subsystems OCSP, PKCS7/SMIME, CMS, CMP/CRMF or TS with no message\nsize limit may experience notable to very long delays when processing those\nmessages, which may lead to a Denial of Service.\r\n\r\nAn OBJECT IDENTIFIER is composed of a series of numbers - sub-identifiers -\nmost of which have no size limit.  OBJ_obj2txt() may be used to translate\nan ASN.1 OBJECT IDENTIFIER given in DER encoding form (using the OpenSSL\ntype ASN1_OBJECT) to its canonical numeric text form, which are the\nsub-identifiers of the OBJECT IDENTIFIER in decimal form, separated by\nperiods.\r\n\r\nWhen one of the sub-identifiers in the OBJECT IDENTIFIER is very large\n(these are sizes that are seen as absurdly large, taking up tens or hundreds\nof KiBs), the translation to a decimal number in text may take a very long\ntime.  The time complexity is O(n^2) with \u0026apos;n\u0026apos; being the size of the\nsub-identifiers in bytes (*).\r\n\r\nWith OpenSSL 3.0, support to fetch cryptographic algorithms using names /\nidentifiers in string form was introduced.  This includes using OBJECT\nIDENTIFIERs in canonical numeric text form as identifiers for fetching\nalgorithms.\r\n\r\nSuch OBJECT IDENTIFIERs may be received through the ASN.1 structure\nAlgorithmIdentifier, which is commonly used in multiple protocols to specify\nwhat cryptographic algorithm should be used to sign or verify, encrypt or\ndecrypt, or digest passed data.\r\n\r\nApplications that call OBJ_obj2txt() directly with untrusted data are\naffected, with any version of OpenSSL.  If the use is for the mere purpose\nof display, the severity is considered low.\r\n\r\nIn OpenSSL 3.0 and newer, this affects the subsystems OCSP, PKCS7/SMIME,\nCMS, CMP/CRMF or TS.  It also impacts anything that processes X.509\ncertificates, including simple things like verifying its signature.\r\n\r\nThe impact on TLS is relatively low, because all versions of OpenSSL have a\n100KiB limit on the peer\u0026apos;s certificate chain.  Additionally, this only\nimpacts clients, or servers that have explicitly enabled client\nauthentication.\r\n\r\nIn OpenSSL 1.1.1 and 1.0.2, this only affects displaying diverse objects,\nsuch as X.509 certificates.  This is assumed to not happen in such a way\nthat it would cause a Denial of Service, so these versions are considered\nnot affected by this issue in such a way that it would be cause for concern,\nand the severity is therefore considered low.(CVE-2023-2650)\r\n\r\nIssue summary: Checking excessively long DH keys or parameters may be very slow.\r\n\r\nImpact summary: Applications that use the functions DH_check(), DH_check_ex()\nor EVP_PKEY_param_check() to check a DH key or DH parameters may experience long\ndelays. Where the key or parameters that are being checked have been obtained\nfrom an untrusted source this may lead to a Denial of Service.\r\n\r\nThe function DH_check() performs various checks on DH parameters. One of those\nchecks confirms that the modulus (\u0026apos;p\u0026apos; parameter) is not too large. Trying to use\na very large modulus is slow and OpenSSL will not normally use a modulus which\nis over 10,000 bits in length.\r\n\r\nHowever the DH_check() function checks numerous aspects of the key or parameters\nthat have been supplied. Some of those checks use the supplied modulus value\neven if it has already been found to be too large.\r\n\r\nAn application that calls DH_check() and supplies a key or parameters obtained\nfrom an untrusted source could be vulernable to a Denial of Service attack.\r\n\r\nThe function DH_check() is itself called by a number of other OpenSSL functions.\nAn application calling any of those other functions may similarly be affected.\nThe other functions affected by this are DH_check_ex() and\nEVP_PKEY_param_check().\r\n\r\nAlso vulnerable are the OpenSSL dhparam and pkeyparam command line applications\nwhen using the \u0026apos;-check\u0026apos; option.\r\n\r\nThe OpenSSL SSL/TLS implementation is not affected by this issue.\nThe OpenSSL 3.0 and 3.1 FIPS providers are not affected by this issue.(CVE-2023-3446)\r\n\r\nIssue summary: Processing a maliciously formatted PKCS12 file may lead OpenSSL\nto crash leading to a potential Denial of Service attack\r\n\r\nImpact summary: Applications loading files in the PKCS12 format from untrusted\nsources might terminate abruptly.\r\n\r\nA file in PKCS12 format can contain certificates and keys and may come from an\nuntrusted source. The PKCS12 specification allows certain fields to be NULL, but\nOpenSSL does not correctly check for this case. This can lead to a NULL pointer\ndereference that results in OpenSSL crashing. If an application processes PKCS12\nfiles from an untrusted source using the OpenSSL APIs then that application will\nbe vulnerable to this issue.\r\n\r\nOpenSSL APIs that are vulnerable to this are: PKCS12_parse(),\nPKCS12_unpack_p7data(), PKCS12_unpack_p7encdata(), PKCS12_unpack_authsafes()\nand PKCS12_newpass().\r\n\r\nWe have also fixed a similar issue in SMIME_write_PKCS7(). However since this\nfunction is related to writing data we do not consider it security significant.\r\n\r\nThe FIPS modules in 3.2, 3.1 and 3.0 are not affected by this issue.(CVE-2024-0727)","status":"published","published":"2024-03-01T11:06:40Z","modified":"2026-08-18T01:18:17.550458993Z","cvss":[{"version":"3.1","score":6.5,"vector":"CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H","level":"medium"}],"updated_at":"2026-11-02T15:52:40.71472Z"},{"id":"OESA-2024-1224","title":"shim security update","description":"Initial UEFI bootloader that handles chaining to a trusted full \\ bootloader under secure boot environments.\r\n\r\nSecurity Fix(es):\r\n\r\nApplications that use a non-default option when verifying certificates may be\nvulnerable to an attack from a malicious CA to circumvent certain checks.\r\n\r\nInvalid certificate policies in leaf certificates are silently ignored by\nOpenSSL and other certificate policy checks are skipped for that certificate.\nA malicious CA could use this to deliberately assert invalid certificate policies\nin order to circumvent policy checking on the certificate altogether.\r\n\r\nPolicy processing is disabled by default but can be enabled by passing\nthe `-policy\u0026apos; argument to the command line utilities or by calling the\n`X509_VERIFY_PARAM_set1_policies()\u0026apos; function.(CVE-2023-0465)\r\n\r\nIssue summary: Processing some specially crafted ASN.1 object identifiers or\ndata containing them may be very slow.\r\n\r\nImpact summary: Applications that use OBJ_obj2txt() directly, or use any of\nthe OpenSSL subsystems OCSP, PKCS7/SMIME, CMS, CMP/CRMF or TS with no message\nsize limit may experience notable to very long delays when processing those\nmessages, which may lead to a Denial of Service.\r\n\r\nAn OBJECT IDENTIFIER is composed of a series of numbers - sub-identifiers -\nmost of which have no size limit.  OBJ_obj2txt() may be used to translate\nan ASN.1 OBJECT IDENTIFIER given in DER encoding form (using the OpenSSL\ntype ASN1_OBJECT) to its canonical numeric text form, which are the\nsub-identifiers of the OBJECT IDENTIFIER in decimal form, separated by\nperiods.\r\n\r\nWhen one of the sub-identifiers in the OBJECT IDENTIFIER is very large\n(these are sizes that are seen as absurdly large, taking up tens or hundreds\nof KiBs), the translation to a decimal number in text may take a very long\ntime.  The time complexity is O(n^2) with \u0026apos;n\u0026apos; being the size of the\nsub-identifiers in bytes (*).\r\n\r\nWith OpenSSL 3.0, support to fetch cryptographic algorithms using names /\nidentifiers in string form was introduced.  This includes using OBJECT\nIDENTIFIERs in canonical numeric text form as identifiers for fetching\nalgorithms.\r\n\r\nSuch OBJECT IDENTIFIERs may be received through the ASN.1 structure\nAlgorithmIdentifier, which is commonly used in multiple protocols to specify\nwhat cryptographic algorithm should be used to sign or verify, encrypt or\ndecrypt, or digest passed data.\r\n\r\nApplications that call OBJ_obj2txt() directly with untrusted data are\naffected, with any version of OpenSSL.  If the use is for the mere purpose\nof display, the severity is considered low.\r\n\r\nIn OpenSSL 3.0 and newer, this affects the subsystems OCSP, PKCS7/SMIME,\nCMS, CMP/CRMF or TS.  It also impacts anything that processes X.509\ncertificates, including simple things like verifying its signature.\r\n\r\nThe impact on TLS is relatively low, because all versions of OpenSSL have a\n100KiB limit on the peer\u0026apos;s certificate chain.  Additionally, this only\nimpacts clients, or servers that have explicitly enabled client\nauthentication.\r\n\r\nIn OpenSSL 1.1.1 and 1.0.2, this only affects displaying diverse objects,\nsuch as X.509 certificates.  This is assumed to not happen in such a way\nthat it would cause a Denial of Service, so these versions are considered\nnot affected by this issue in such a way that it would be cause for concern,\nand the severity is therefore considered low.(CVE-2023-2650)\r\n\r\nIssue summary: Checking excessively long DH keys or parameters may be very slow.\r\n\r\nImpact summary: Applications that use the functions DH_check(), DH_check_ex()\nor EVP_PKEY_param_check() to check a DH key or DH parameters may experience long\ndelays. Where the key or parameters that are being checked have been obtained\nfrom an untrusted source this may lead to a Denial of Service.\r\n\r\nThe function DH_check() performs various checks on DH parameters. One of those\nchecks confirms that the modulus (\u0026apos;p\u0026apos; parameter) is not too large. Trying to use\na very large modulus is slow and OpenSSL will not normally use a modulus which\nis over 10,000 bits in length.\r\n\r\nHowever the DH_check() function checks numerous aspects of the key or parameters\nthat have been supplied. Some of those checks use the supplied modulus value\neven if it has already been found to be too large.\r\n\r\nAn application that calls DH_check() and supplies a key or parameters obtained\nfrom an untrusted source could be vulernable to a Denial of Service attack.\r\n\r\nThe function DH_check() is itself called by a number of other OpenSSL functions.\nAn application calling any of those other functions may similarly be affected.\nThe other functions affected by this are DH_check_ex() and\nEVP_PKEY_param_check().\r\n\r\nAlso vulnerable are the OpenSSL dhparam and pkeyparam command line applications\nwhen using the \u0026apos;-check\u0026apos; option.\r\n\r\nThe OpenSSL SSL/TLS implementation is not affected by this issue.\nThe OpenSSL 3.0 and 3.1 FIPS providers are not affected by this issue.(CVE-2023-3446)\r\n\r\nIssue summary: Processing a maliciously formatted PKCS12 file may lead OpenSSL\nto crash leading to a potential Denial of Service attack\r\n\r\nImpact summary: Applications loading files in the PKCS12 format from untrusted\nsources might terminate abruptly.\r\n\r\nA file in PKCS12 format can contain certificates and keys and may come from an\nuntrusted source. The PKCS12 specification allows certain fields to be NULL, but\nOpenSSL does not correctly check for this case. This can lead to a NULL pointer\ndereference that results in OpenSSL crashing. If an application processes PKCS12\nfiles from an untrusted source using the OpenSSL APIs then that application will\nbe vulnerable to this issue.\r\n\r\nOpenSSL APIs that are vulnerable to this are: PKCS12_parse(),\nPKCS12_unpack_p7data(), PKCS12_unpack_p7encdata(), PKCS12_unpack_authsafes()\nand PKCS12_newpass().\r\n\r\nWe have also fixed a similar issue in SMIME_write_PKCS7(). However since this\nfunction is related to writing data we do not consider it security significant.\r\n\r\nThe FIPS modules in 3.2, 3.1 and 3.0 are not affected by this issue.(CVE-2024-0727)","status":"published","published":"2024-03-01T11:06:40Z","modified":"2026-08-18T01:18:17.589753457Z","cvss":[{"version":"3.1","score":6.5,"vector":"CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H","level":"medium"}],"updated_at":"2026-11-02T15:52:40.71472Z"},{"id":"OESA-2024-1225","title":"shim security update","description":"Initial UEFI bootloader that handles chaining to a trusted full \\ bootloader under secure boot environments.\r\n\r\nSecurity Fix(es):\r\n\r\nApplications that use a non-default option when verifying certificates may be\nvulnerable to an attack from a malicious CA to circumvent certain checks.\r\n\r\nInvalid certificate policies in leaf certificates are silently ignored by\nOpenSSL and other certificate policy checks are skipped for that certificate.\nA malicious CA could use this to deliberately assert invalid certificate policies\nin order to circumvent policy checking on the certificate altogether.\r\n\r\nPolicy processing is disabled by default but can be enabled by passing\nthe `-policy\u0026apos; argument to the command line utilities or by calling the\n`X509_VERIFY_PARAM_set1_policies()\u0026apos; function.(CVE-2023-0465)\r\n\r\nIssue summary: Processing some specially crafted ASN.1 object identifiers or\ndata containing them may be very slow.\r\n\r\nImpact summary: Applications that use OBJ_obj2txt() directly, or use any of\nthe OpenSSL subsystems OCSP, PKCS7/SMIME, CMS, CMP/CRMF or TS with no message\nsize limit may experience notable to very long delays when processing those\nmessages, which may lead to a Denial of Service.\r\n\r\nAn OBJECT IDENTIFIER is composed of a series of numbers - sub-identifiers -\nmost of which have no size limit.  OBJ_obj2txt() may be used to translate\nan ASN.1 OBJECT IDENTIFIER given in DER encoding form (using the OpenSSL\ntype ASN1_OBJECT) to its canonical numeric text form, which are the\nsub-identifiers of the OBJECT IDENTIFIER in decimal form, separated by\nperiods.\r\n\r\nWhen one of the sub-identifiers in the OBJECT IDENTIFIER is very large\n(these are sizes that are seen as absurdly large, taking up tens or hundreds\nof KiBs), the translation to a decimal number in text may take a very long\ntime.  The time complexity is O(n^2) with \u0026apos;n\u0026apos; being the size of the\nsub-identifiers in bytes (*).\r\n\r\nWith OpenSSL 3.0, support to fetch cryptographic algorithms using names /\nidentifiers in string form was introduced.  This includes using OBJECT\nIDENTIFIERs in canonical numeric text form as identifiers for fetching\nalgorithms.\r\n\r\nSuch OBJECT IDENTIFIERs may be received through the ASN.1 structure\nAlgorithmIdentifier, which is commonly used in multiple protocols to specify\nwhat cryptographic algorithm should be used to sign or verify, encrypt or\ndecrypt, or digest passed data.\r\n\r\nApplications that call OBJ_obj2txt() directly with untrusted data are\naffected, with any version of OpenSSL.  If the use is for the mere purpose\nof display, the severity is considered low.\r\n\r\nIn OpenSSL 3.0 and newer, this affects the subsystems OCSP, PKCS7/SMIME,\nCMS, CMP/CRMF or TS.  It also impacts anything that processes X.509\ncertificates, including simple things like verifying its signature.\r\n\r\nThe impact on TLS is relatively low, because all versions of OpenSSL have a\n100KiB limit on the peer\u0026apos;s certificate chain.  Additionally, this only\nimpacts clients, or servers that have explicitly enabled client\nauthentication.\r\n\r\nIn OpenSSL 1.1.1 and 1.0.2, this only affects displaying diverse objects,\nsuch as X.509 certificates.  This is assumed to not happen in such a way\nthat it would cause a Denial of Service, so these versions are considered\nnot affected by this issue in such a way that it would be cause for concern,\nand the severity is therefore considered low.(CVE-2023-2650)\r\n\r\nIssue summary: Checking excessively long DH keys or parameters may be very slow.\r\n\r\nImpact summary: Applications that use the functions DH_check(), DH_check_ex()\nor EVP_PKEY_param_check() to check a DH key or DH parameters may experience long\ndelays. Where the key or parameters that are being checked have been obtained\nfrom an untrusted source this may lead to a Denial of Service.\r\n\r\nThe function DH_check() performs various checks on DH parameters. One of those\nchecks confirms that the modulus (\u0026apos;p\u0026apos; parameter) is not too large. Trying to use\na very large modulus is slow and OpenSSL will not normally use a modulus which\nis over 10,000 bits in length.\r\n\r\nHowever the DH_check() function checks numerous aspects of the key or parameters\nthat have been supplied. Some of those checks use the supplied modulus value\neven if it has already been found to be too large.\r\n\r\nAn application that calls DH_check() and supplies a key or parameters obtained\nfrom an untrusted source could be vulernable to a Denial of Service attack.\r\n\r\nThe function DH_check() is itself called by a number of other OpenSSL functions.\nAn application calling any of those other functions may similarly be affected.\nThe other functions affected by this are DH_check_ex() and\nEVP_PKEY_param_check().\r\n\r\nAlso vulnerable are the OpenSSL dhparam and pkeyparam command line applications\nwhen using the \u0026apos;-check\u0026apos; option.\r\n\r\nThe OpenSSL SSL/TLS implementation is not affected by this issue.\nThe OpenSSL 3.0 and 3.1 FIPS providers are not affected by this issue.(CVE-2023-3446)\r\n\r\nIssue summary: Processing a maliciously formatted PKCS12 file may lead OpenSSL\nto crash leading to a potential Denial of Service attack\r\n\r\nImpact summary: Applications loading files in the PKCS12 format from untrusted\nsources might terminate abruptly.\r\n\r\nA file in PKCS12 format can contain certificates and keys and may come from an\nuntrusted source. The PKCS12 specification allows certain fields to be NULL, but\nOpenSSL does not correctly check for this case. This can lead to a NULL pointer\ndereference that results in OpenSSL crashing. If an application processes PKCS12\nfiles from an untrusted source using the OpenSSL APIs then that application will\nbe vulnerable to this issue.\r\n\r\nOpenSSL APIs that are vulnerable to this are: PKCS12_parse(),\nPKCS12_unpack_p7data(), PKCS12_unpack_p7encdata(), PKCS12_unpack_authsafes()\nand PKCS12_newpass().\r\n\r\nWe have also fixed a similar issue in SMIME_write_PKCS7(). However since this\nfunction is related to writing data we do not consider it security significant.\r\n\r\nThe FIPS modules in 3.2, 3.1 and 3.0 are not affected by this issue.(CVE-2024-0727)","status":"published","published":"2024-03-01T11:06:40Z","modified":"2026-08-18T01:18:17.567594433Z","cvss":[{"version":"3.1","score":6.5,"vector":"CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H","level":"medium"}],"updated_at":"2026-11-02T15:52:40.71472Z"},{"id":"OESA-2024-1226","title":"shim security update","description":"Initial UEFI bootloader that handles chaining to a trusted full \\ bootloader under secure boot environments.\r\n\r\nSecurity Fix(es):\r\n\r\nApplications that use a non-default option when verifying certificates may be\nvulnerable to an attack from a malicious CA to circumvent certain checks.\r\n\r\nInvalid certificate policies in leaf certificates are silently ignored by\nOpenSSL and other certificate policy checks are skipped for that certificate.\nA malicious CA could use this to deliberately assert invalid certificate policies\nin order to circumvent policy checking on the certificate altogether.\r\n\r\nPolicy processing is disabled by default but can be enabled by passing\nthe `-policy\u0026apos; argument to the command line utilities or by calling the\n`X509_VERIFY_PARAM_set1_policies()\u0026apos; function.(CVE-2023-0465)\r\n\r\nIssue summary: Processing some specially crafted ASN.1 object identifiers or\ndata containing them may be very slow.\r\n\r\nImpact summary: Applications that use OBJ_obj2txt() directly, or use any of\nthe OpenSSL subsystems OCSP, PKCS7/SMIME, CMS, CMP/CRMF or TS with no message\nsize limit may experience notable to very long delays when processing those\nmessages, which may lead to a Denial of Service.\r\n\r\nAn OBJECT IDENTIFIER is composed of a series of numbers - sub-identifiers -\nmost of which have no size limit.  OBJ_obj2txt() may be used to translate\nan ASN.1 OBJECT IDENTIFIER given in DER encoding form (using the OpenSSL\ntype ASN1_OBJECT) to its canonical numeric text form, which are the\nsub-identifiers of the OBJECT IDENTIFIER in decimal form, separated by\nperiods.\r\n\r\nWhen one of the sub-identifiers in the OBJECT IDENTIFIER is very large\n(these are sizes that are seen as absurdly large, taking up tens or hundreds\nof KiBs), the translation to a decimal number in text may take a very long\ntime.  The time complexity is O(n^2) with \u0026apos;n\u0026apos; being the size of the\nsub-identifiers in bytes (*).\r\n\r\nWith OpenSSL 3.0, support to fetch cryptographic algorithms using names /\nidentifiers in string form was introduced.  This includes using OBJECT\nIDENTIFIERs in canonical numeric text form as identifiers for fetching\nalgorithms.\r\n\r\nSuch OBJECT IDENTIFIERs may be received through the ASN.1 structure\nAlgorithmIdentifier, which is commonly used in multiple protocols to specify\nwhat cryptographic algorithm should be used to sign or verify, encrypt or\ndecrypt, or digest passed data.\r\n\r\nApplications that call OBJ_obj2txt() directly with untrusted data are\naffected, with any version of OpenSSL.  If the use is for the mere purpose\nof display, the severity is considered low.\r\n\r\nIn OpenSSL 3.0 and newer, this affects the subsystems OCSP, PKCS7/SMIME,\nCMS, CMP/CRMF or TS.  It also impacts anything that processes X.509\ncertificates, including simple things like verifying its signature.\r\n\r\nThe impact on TLS is relatively low, because all versions of OpenSSL have a\n100KiB limit on the peer\u0026apos;s certificate chain.  Additionally, this only\nimpacts clients, or servers that have explicitly enabled client\nauthentication.\r\n\r\nIn OpenSSL 1.1.1 and 1.0.2, this only affects displaying diverse objects,\nsuch as X.509 certificates.  This is assumed to not happen in such a way\nthat it would cause a Denial of Service, so these versions are considered\nnot affected by this issue in such a way that it would be cause for concern,\nand the severity is therefore considered low.(CVE-2023-2650)\r\n\r\nIssue summary: Processing a maliciously formatted PKCS12 file may lead OpenSSL\nto crash leading to a potential Denial of Service attack\r\n\r\nImpact summary: Applications loading files in the PKCS12 format from untrusted\nsources might terminate abruptly.\r\n\r\nA file in PKCS12 format can contain certificates and keys and may come from an\nuntrusted source. The PKCS12 specification allows certain fields to be NULL, but\nOpenSSL does not correctly check for this case. This can lead to a NULL pointer\ndereference that results in OpenSSL crashing. If an application processes PKCS12\nfiles from an untrusted source using the OpenSSL APIs then that application will\nbe vulnerable to this issue.\r\n\r\nOpenSSL APIs that are vulnerable to this are: PKCS12_parse(),\nPKCS12_unpack_p7data(), PKCS12_unpack_p7encdata(), PKCS12_unpack_authsafes()\nand PKCS12_newpass().\r\n\r\nWe have also fixed a similar issue in SMIME_write_PKCS7(). However since this\nfunction is related to writing data we do not consider it security significant.\r\n\r\nThe FIPS modules in 3.2, 3.1 and 3.0 are not affected by this issue.(CVE-2024-0727)","status":"published","published":"2024-03-01T11:06:40Z","modified":"2026-08-18T01:18:17.58243158Z","cvss":[{"version":"3.1","score":6.5,"vector":"CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H","level":"medium"}],"updated_at":"2026-11-02T15:52:40.71472Z"},{"id":"OESA-2024-1227","title":"shim security update","description":"Initial UEFI bootloader that handles chaining to a trusted full \\ bootloader under secure boot environments.\r\n\r\nSecurity Fix(es):\r\n\r\nApplications that use a non-default option when verifying certificates may be\nvulnerable to an attack from a malicious CA to circumvent certain checks.\r\n\r\nInvalid certificate policies in leaf certificates are silently ignored by\nOpenSSL and other certificate policy checks are skipped for that certificate.\nA malicious CA could use this to deliberately assert invalid certificate policies\nin order to circumvent policy checking on the certificate altogether.\r\n\r\nPolicy processing is disabled by default but can be enabled by passing\nthe `-policy\u0026apos; argument to the command line utilities or by calling the\n`X509_VERIFY_PARAM_set1_policies()\u0026apos; function.(CVE-2023-0465)\r\n\r\nIssue summary: Processing some specially crafted ASN.1 object identifiers or\ndata containing them may be very slow.\r\n\r\nImpact summary: Applications that use OBJ_obj2txt() directly, or use any of\nthe OpenSSL subsystems OCSP, PKCS7/SMIME, CMS, CMP/CRMF or TS with no message\nsize limit may experience notable to very long delays when processing those\nmessages, which may lead to a Denial of Service.\r\n\r\nAn OBJECT IDENTIFIER is composed of a series of numbers - sub-identifiers -\nmost of which have no size limit.  OBJ_obj2txt() may be used to translate\nan ASN.1 OBJECT IDENTIFIER given in DER encoding form (using the OpenSSL\ntype ASN1_OBJECT) to its canonical numeric text form, which are the\nsub-identifiers of the OBJECT IDENTIFIER in decimal form, separated by\nperiods.\r\n\r\nWhen one of the sub-identifiers in the OBJECT IDENTIFIER is very large\n(these are sizes that are seen as absurdly large, taking up tens or hundreds\nof KiBs), the translation to a decimal number in text may take a very long\ntime.  The time complexity is O(n^2) with \u0026apos;n\u0026apos; being the size of the\nsub-identifiers in bytes (*).\r\n\r\nWith OpenSSL 3.0, support to fetch cryptographic algorithms using names /\nidentifiers in string form was introduced.  This includes using OBJECT\nIDENTIFIERs in canonical numeric text form as identifiers for fetching\nalgorithms.\r\n\r\nSuch OBJECT IDENTIFIERs may be received through the ASN.1 structure\nAlgorithmIdentifier, which is commonly used in multiple protocols to specify\nwhat cryptographic algorithm should be used to sign or verify, encrypt or\ndecrypt, or digest passed data.\r\n\r\nApplications that call OBJ_obj2txt() directly with untrusted data are\naffected, with any version of OpenSSL.  If the use is for the mere purpose\nof display, the severity is considered low.\r\n\r\nIn OpenSSL 3.0 and newer, this affects the subsystems OCSP, PKCS7/SMIME,\nCMS, CMP/CRMF or TS.  It also impacts anything that processes X.509\ncertificates, including simple things like verifying its signature.\r\n\r\nThe impact on TLS is relatively low, because all versions of OpenSSL have a\n100KiB limit on the peer\u0026apos;s certificate chain.  Additionally, this only\nimpacts clients, or servers that have explicitly enabled client\nauthentication.\r\n\r\nIn OpenSSL 1.1.1 and 1.0.2, this only affects displaying diverse objects,\nsuch as X.509 certificates.  This is assumed to not happen in such a way\nthat it would cause a Denial of Service, so these versions are considered\nnot affected by this issue in such a way that it would be cause for concern,\nand the severity is therefore considered low.(CVE-2023-2650)\r\n\r\nIssue summary: Checking excessively long DH keys or parameters may be very slow.\r\n\r\nImpact summary: Applications that use the functions DH_check(), DH_check_ex()\nor EVP_PKEY_param_check() to check a DH key or DH parameters may experience long\ndelays. Where the key or parameters that are being checked have been obtained\nfrom an untrusted source this may lead to a Denial of Service.\r\n\r\nThe function DH_check() performs various checks on DH parameters. One of those\nchecks confirms that the modulus (\u0026apos;p\u0026apos; parameter) is not too large. Trying to use\na very large modulus is slow and OpenSSL will not normally use a modulus which\nis over 10,000 bits in length.\r\n\r\nHowever the DH_check() function checks numerous aspects of the key or parameters\nthat have been supplied. Some of those checks use the supplied modulus value\neven if it has already been found to be too large.\r\n\r\nAn application that calls DH_check() and supplies a key or parameters obtained\nfrom an untrusted source could be vulernable to a Denial of Service attack.\r\n\r\nThe function DH_check() is itself called by a number of other OpenSSL functions.\nAn application calling any of those other functions may similarly be affected.\nThe other functions affected by this are DH_check_ex() and\nEVP_PKEY_param_check().\r\n\r\nAlso vulnerable are the OpenSSL dhparam and pkeyparam command line applications\nwhen using the \u0026apos;-check\u0026apos; option.\r\n\r\nThe OpenSSL SSL/TLS implementation is not affected by this issue.\nThe OpenSSL 3.0 and 3.1 FIPS providers are not affected by this issue.(CVE-2023-3446)","status":"published","published":"2024-03-01T11:06:40Z","modified":"2026-08-18T01:18:17.612282905Z","cvss":[{"version":"3.1","score":6.5,"vector":"CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H","level":"medium"}],"updated_at":"2026-11-02T15:52:40.71472Z"},{"id":"OESA-2024-1238","title":"edk2 security update","description":"EDK II is a modern, feature-rich, cross-platform firmware development environment for the UEFI and PI specifications.\r\n\r\nSecurity Fix(es):\r\n\r\nA security vulnerability has been identified in all supported versions\r\n\r\nof OpenSSL related to the verification of X.509 certificate chains\nthat include policy constraints.  Attackers may be able to exploit this\nvulnerability by creating a malicious certificate chain that triggers\nexponential use of computational resources, leading to a denial-of-service\n(DoS) attack on affected systems.\r\n\r\nPolicy processing is disabled by default but can be enabled by passing\nthe `-policy\u0026apos; argument to the command line utilities or by calling the\n`X509_VERIFY_PARAM_set1_policies()\u0026apos; function.(CVE-2023-0464)\r\n\r\nApplications that use a non-default option when verifying certificates may be\nvulnerable to an attack from a malicious CA to circumvent certain checks.\r\n\r\nInvalid certificate policies in leaf certificates are silently ignored by\nOpenSSL and other certificate policy checks are skipped for that certificate.\nA malicious CA could use this to deliberately assert invalid certificate policies\nin order to circumvent policy checking on the certificate altogether.\r\n\r\nPolicy processing is disabled by default but can be enabled by passing\nthe `-policy\u0026apos; argument to the command line utilities or by calling the\n`X509_VERIFY_PARAM_set1_policies()\u0026apos; function.(CVE-2023-0465)\r\n\r\nThe function X509_VERIFY_PARAM_add0_policy() is documented to\nimplicitly enable the certificate policy check when doing certificate\nverification. However the implementation of the function does not\nenable the check which allows certificates with invalid or incorrect\npolicies to pass the certificate verification.\r\n\r\nAs suddenly enabling the policy check could break existing deployments it was\ndecided to keep the existing behavior of the X509_VERIFY_PARAM_add0_policy()\nfunction.\r\n\r\nInstead the applications that require OpenSSL to perform certificate\npolicy check need to use X509_VERIFY_PARAM_set1_policies() or explicitly\nenable the policy check by calling X509_VERIFY_PARAM_set_flags() with\nthe X509_V_FLAG_POLICY_CHECK flag argument.\r\n\r\nCertificate policy checks are disabled by default in OpenSSL and are not\ncommonly used by applications.(CVE-2023-0466)\r\n\r\nIssue summary: Processing some specially crafted ASN.1 object identifiers or\ndata containing them may be very slow.\r\n\r\nImpact summary: Applications that use OBJ_obj2txt() directly, or use any of\nthe OpenSSL subsystems OCSP, PKCS7/SMIME, CMS, CMP/CRMF or TS with no message\nsize limit may experience notable to very long delays when processing those\nmessages, which may lead to a Denial of Service.\r\n\r\nAn OBJECT IDENTIFIER is composed of a series of numbers - sub-identifiers -\nmost of which have no size limit.  OBJ_obj2txt() may be used to translate\nan ASN.1 OBJECT IDENTIFIER given in DER encoding form (using the OpenSSL\ntype ASN1_OBJECT) to its canonical numeric text form, which are the\nsub-identifiers of the OBJECT IDENTIFIER in decimal form, separated by\nperiods.\r\n\r\nWhen one of the sub-identifiers in the OBJECT IDENTIFIER is very large\n(these are sizes that are seen as absurdly large, taking up tens or hundreds\nof KiBs), the translation to a decimal number in text may take a very long\ntime.  The time complexity is O(n^2) with \u0026apos;n\u0026apos; being the size of the\nsub-identifiers in bytes (*).\r\n\r\nWith OpenSSL 3.0, support to fetch cryptographic algorithms using names /\nidentifiers in string form was introduced.  This includes using OBJECT\nIDENTIFIERs in canonical numeric text form as identifiers for fetching\nalgorithms.\r\n\r\nSuch OBJECT IDENTIFIERs may be received through the ASN.1 structure\nAlgorithmIdentifier, which is commonly used in multiple protocols to specify\nwhat cryptographic algorithm should be used to sign or verify, encrypt or\ndecrypt, or digest passed data.\r\n\r\nApplications that call OBJ_obj2txt() directly with untrusted data are\naffected, with any version of OpenSSL.  If the use is for the mere purpose\nof display, the severity is considered low.\r\n\r\nIn OpenSSL 3.0 and newer, this affects the subsystems OCSP, PKCS7/SMIME,\nCMS, CMP/CRMF or TS.  It also impacts anything that processes X.509\ncertificates, including simple things like verifying its signature.\r\n\r\nThe impact on TLS is relatively low, because all versions of OpenSSL have a\n100KiB limit on the peer\u0026apos;s certificate chain.  Additionally, this only\nimpacts clients, or servers that have explicitly enabled client\nauthentication.\r\n\r\nIn OpenSSL 1.1.1 and 1.0.2, this only affects displaying diverse objects,\nsuch as X.509 certificates.  This is assumed to not happen in such a way\nthat it would cause a Denial of Service, so these versions are considered\nnot affected by this issue in such a way that it would be cause for concern,\nand the severity is therefore considered low.(CVE-2023-2650)\r\n\r\nIssue summary: Checking excessively long DH keys or parameters may be very slow.\r\n\r\nImpact summary: Applications that use the functions DH_check(), DH_check_ex()\nor EVP_PKEY_param_check() to check a DH key or DH parameters may experience long\ndelays. Where the key or parameters that are being checked have been obtained\nfrom an untrusted source this may lead to a Denial of Service.\r\n\r\nThe function DH_check() performs various checks on DH parameters. One of those\nchecks confirms that the modulus (\u0026apos;p\u0026apos; parameter) is not too large. Trying to use\na very large modulus is slow and OpenSSL will not normally use a modulus which\nis over 10,000 bits in length.\r\n\r\nHowever the DH_check() function checks numerous aspects of the key or parameters\nthat have been supplied. Some of those checks use the supplied modulus value\neven if it has already been found to be too large.\r\n\r\nAn application that calls DH_check() and supplies a key or parameters obtained\nfrom an untrusted source could be vulernable to a Denial of Service attack.\r\n\r\nThe function DH_check() is itself called by a number of other OpenSSL functions.\nAn application calling any of those other functions may similarly be affected.\nThe other functions affected by this are DH_check_ex() and\nEVP_PKEY_param_check().\r\n\r\nAlso vulnerable are the OpenSSL dhparam and pkeyparam command line applications\nwhen using the \u0026apos;-check\u0026apos; option.\r\n\r\nThe OpenSSL SSL/TLS implementation is not affected by this issue.\nThe OpenSSL 3.0 and 3.1 FIPS providers are not affected by this issue.(CVE-2023-3446)\r\n\r\nIssue summary: Processing a maliciously formatted PKCS12 file may lead OpenSSL\nto crash leading to a potential Denial of Service attack\r\n\r\nImpact summary: Applications loading files in the PKCS12 format from untrusted\nsources might terminate abruptly.\r\n\r\nA file in PKCS12 format can contain certificates and keys and may come from an\nuntrusted source. The PKCS12 specification allows certain fields to be NULL, but\nOpenSSL does not correctly check for this case. This can lead to a NULL pointer\ndereference that results in OpenSSL crashing. If an application processes PKCS12\nfiles from an untrusted source using the OpenSSL APIs then that application will\nbe vulnerable to this issue.\r\n\r\nOpenSSL APIs that are vulnerable to this are: PKCS12_parse(),\nPKCS12_unpack_p7data(), PKCS12_unpack_p7encdata(), PKCS12_unpack_authsafes()\nand PKCS12_newpass().\r\n\r\nWe have also fixed a similar issue in SMIME_write_PKCS7(). However since this\nfunction is related to writing data we do not consider it security significant.\r\n\r\nThe FIPS modules in 3.2, 3.1 and 3.0 are not affected by this issue.(CVE-2024-0727)","status":"published","published":"2024-03-01T11:06:41Z","modified":"2026-08-18T01:18:17.787806738Z","cvss":[{"version":"3.1","score":7.5,"vector":"CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H","level":"high"}],"updated_at":"2026-11-02T15:52:40.71472Z"},{"id":"RHSA-2023:3722","title":"Red Hat Security Advisory: openssl security and bug fix update","status":"published","published":"2024-09-16T11:07:20Z","modified":"2026-10-15T10:04:28Z","cvss":[{"version":"3.1","score":6.5,"vector":"CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H","level":"medium"}],"updated_at":"2026-11-02T15:53:11.154197Z"},{"id":"RHSA-2023:7622","title":"Red Hat Security Advisory: Red Hat JBoss Web Server 5.7.7 release and security update","status":"published","published":"2024-09-13T21:18:55Z","modified":"2026-10-15T10:06:17Z","cvss":[{"version":"3.1","score":6.5,"vector":"CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H","level":"medium"}],"updated_at":"2026-11-02T15:53:12.270484Z"},{"id":"RHSA-2023:7625","title":"Red Hat Security Advisory: Red Hat JBoss Core Services Apache HTTP Server 2.4.57 SP2 security update","status":"published","published":"2024-09-13T21:19:05Z","modified":"2026-10-15T10:06:18Z","cvss":[{"version":"3.1","score":8.1,"vector":"CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H","level":"high"}],"updated_at":"2026-11-02T15:53:12.270484Z"},{"id":"UBUNTU-CVE-2023-0465","description":"Applications that use a non-default option when verifying certificates may be vulnerable to an attack from a malicious CA to circumvent certain checks. Invalid certificate policies in leaf certificates are silently ignored by OpenSSL and other certificate policy checks are skipped for that certificate. A malicious CA could use this to deliberately assert invalid certificate policies in order to circumvent policy checking on the certificate altogether. Policy processing is disabled by default but can be enabled by passing the `-policy' argument to the command line utilities or by calling the `X509_VERIFY_PARAM_set1_policies()' function.","status":"published","published":"2023-03-28T15:15:00Z","modified":"2026-10-05T19:20:36.516910623Z","cvss":[{"version":"3.1","score":5.3,"vector":"CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N","level":"medium"},{"version":"3.1","score":5.3,"vector":"CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N","level":"medium"}],"updated_at":"2026-11-02T16:54:18.756095Z"},{"id":"ALSA-2023:3722","title":"Moderate: openssl security and bug fix update","description":"OpenSSL is a toolkit that implements the Secure Sockets Layer (SSL) and Transport Layer Security (TLS) protocols, as well as a full-strength general-purpose cryptography library.\n\nSecurity Fix(es):\n\n* openssl: Possible DoS translating ASN.1 object identifiers (CVE-2023-2650)\n* openssl: Denial of service by excessive resource usage in verifying X509 policy constraints (CVE-2023-0464)\n* openssl: Invalid certificate policies in leaf certificates are silently ignored (CVE-2023-0465)\n* openssl: Certificate policy check not enabled (CVE-2023-0466)\n* openssl: Input buffer over-read in AES-XTS implementation on 64 bit ARM (CVE-2023-1255)\n\nFor more details about the security issue(s), including the impact, a CVSS score, acknowledgments, and other related information, refer to the CVE page(s) listed in the References section.\n\nBug Fix(es):\n\n* In FIPS mode, openssl KDFs should only allow selected hash algorithms (BZ#2175860)\n* In FIPS mode, openssl should reject short KDF input or output keys or provide an indicator (BZ#2175864)\n* In FIPS mode, openssl should provide an indicator for AES-GCM to query whether the IV was generated internally or provided externally (BZ#2175868)\n* openssl FIPS mode self-test should zeroize `out` in `verify_integrity` in providers/fips/self_test.c (BZ#2175873)\n* In FIPS mode, openssl should not support RSA encryption or decryption without padding (outside of RSASVE) or provide an indicator (BZ#2178029)\n* In FIPS mode, openssl should reject EVP_PKEY_fromdata() for short DHX keys, or provide an indicator (BZ#2178030)\n* In FIPS mode, openssl should not use the legacy ECDSA_do_sign(), RSA_public_encrypt(), RSA_private_decrypt() functions for pairwise consistency tests (BZ#2178034)\n* In FIPS mode, openssl should enter error state when DH PCT fails (BZ#2178039)\n* In FIPS mode, openssl should always run the PBKDF2 lower bounds checks or provide an indicator when the pkcs5 parameter is set to 1 (BZ#2178137)\n* Support requiring EMS in TLS 1.2, default to it when in FIPS mode (BZ#2188046)\n* OpenSSL rsa_verify_recover doesn't use the same key checks as rsa_verify in FIPS mode (BZ#2188052)\n* AlmaLinux9.0 - sshd dumps core when ibmca engine is configured with default_algorithms = CIPHERS or ALL (openssl) (BZ#2211396)","status":"published","published":"2023-06-21T00:00:00Z","modified":"2026-10-29T11:31:26.222998471Z","updated_at":"2026-11-02T15:27:52.091404Z"},{"id":"DLA-3449-1","title":"openssl - security update","status":"published","published":"2023-06-08T00:00:00Z","modified":"2026-03-09T01:22:47.322805Z","updated_at":"2026-11-02T15:46:11.734021Z"},{"id":"DSA-5417-1","title":"openssl - security update","status":"published","published":"2023-05-31T00:00:00Z","modified":"2026-03-09T02:09:39.950679Z","updated_at":"2026-11-02T15:46:17.543497Z"},{"id":"MGASA-2023-0130","title":"Updated openssl packages fix security vulnerability","description":"A read buffer overrun can be triggered in X.509 certificate verification,\nspecifically in name constraint checking. Note that this occurs after\ncertificate chain signature verification and requires either a CA to have\nsigned the malicious certificate or for the application to continue\ncertificate verification despite failure to construct a path to a trusted\nissuer. The read buffer overrun might result in a crash which could lead\nto a denial of service attack. In theory it could also result in the\ndisclosure of private memory contents (such as private keys, or sensitive\nplaintext) although we are not aware of any working exploit leading to\nmemory contents disclosure as of the time of release of this advisory. In\na TLS client, this can be triggered by connecting to a malicious server.\nIn a TLS server, this can be triggered if the server requests client\nauthentication and a malicious client connects. (CVE-2022-4203)\n\nA timing based side channel exists in the OpenSSL RSA Decryption\nimplementation which could be sufficient to recover a plaintext across a\nnetwork in a Bleichenbacher style attack. To achieve a successful\ndecryption an attacker would have to be able to send a very large number\nof trial messages for decryption. The vulnerability affects all RSA\npadding modes: PKCS#1 v1.5, RSA-OEAP and RSASVE. For example, in a TLS\nconnection, RSA is commonly used by a client to send an encrypted\npre-master secret to the server. An attacker that had observed a genuine\nconnection between a client and a server could use this flaw to send trial\nmessages to the server and record the time taken to process them. After a\nsufficiently large number of messages the attacker could recover the\npre-master secret used for the original connection and thus be able to\ndecrypt the application data sent over that connection. (CVE-2022-4304)\n\nThe function PEM_read_bio_ex() reads a PEM file from a BIO and parses and\ndecodes the \"name\" (e.g. \"CERTIFICATE\"), any header data and the payload\ndata. If the function succeeds then the \"name_out\", \"header\" and \"data\"\narguments are populated with pointers to buffers containing the relevant\ndecoded data. The caller is responsible for freeing those buffers. It is\npossible to construct a PEM file that results in 0 bytes of payload data.\nIn this case PEM_read_bio_ex() will return a failure code but will\npopulate the header argument with a pointer to a buffer that has already\nbeen freed. If the caller also frees this buffer then a double free will\noccur. This will most likely lead to a crash. This could be exploited by\nan attacker who has the ability to supply malicious PEM files for parsing\nto achieve a denial of service attack. The functions PEM_read_bio() and\nPEM_read() are simple wrappers around PEM_read_bio_ex() and therefore\nthese functions are also directly affected. These functions are also\ncalled indirectly by a number of other OpenSSL functions including\nPEM_X509_INFO_read_bio_ex() and SSL_CTX_use_serverinfo_file() which are\nalso vulnerable. Some OpenSSL internal uses of these functions are not\nvulnerable because the caller does not free the header argument if\nPEM_read_bio_ex() returns a failure code. These locations include the\nPEM_read_bio_TYPE() functions as well as the decoders introduced in\nOpenSSL 3.0. The OpenSSL asn1parse command line application is also\nimpacted by this issue. (CVE-2022-4450)\n\nThe public API function BIO_new_NDEF is a helper function used for\nstreaming ASN.1 data via a BIO. It is primarily used internally to OpenSSL\nto support the SMIME, CMS and PKCS7 streaming capabilities, but may also\nbe called directly by end user applications. The function receives a BIO\nfrom the caller, prepends a new BIO_f_asn1 filter BIO onto the front of it\nto form a BIO chain, and then returns the new head of the BIO chain to the\ncaller. Under certain conditions, for example if a CMS recipient public\nkey is invalid, the new filter BIO is freed and the function returns a\nNULL result indicating a failure. However, in this case, the BIO chain is\nnot properly cleaned up and the BIO passed by the caller still retains\ninternal pointers to the previously freed filter BIO. If the caller then\ngoes on to call BIO_pop() on the BIO then a use-after-free will occur.\nThis will most likely result in a crash. This scenario occurs directly in\nthe internal function B64_write_ASN1() which may cause BIO_new_NDEF() to\nbe called and will subsequently call BIO_pop() on the BIO. This internal\nfunction is in turn called by the public API functions\nPEM_write_bio_ASN1_stream, PEM_write_bio_CMS_stream,\nPEM_write_bio_PKCS7_stream, SMIME_write_ASN1, SMIME_write_CMS and\nSMIME_write_PKCS7. Other public API functions that may be impacted by this\ninclude i2d_ASN1_bio_stream, BIO_new_CMS, BIO_new_PKCS7,\ni2d_CMS_bio_stream and i2d_PKCS7_bio_stream. The OpenSSL cms and smime\ncommand line applications are similarly affected. (CVE-2023-0215)\n\nAn invalid pointer dereference on read can be triggered when an\napplication tries to load malformed PKCS7 data with the d2i_PKCS7(),\nd2i_PKCS7_bio() or d2i_PKCS7_fp() functions. The result of the dereference\nis an application crash which could lead to a denial of service attack.\nThe TLS implementation in OpenSSL does not call this function however\nthird party applications might call these functions on untrusted data.\n(CVE-2023-0216)\n\nAn invalid pointer dereference on read can be triggered when an\napplication tries to check a malformed DSA public key by the\nEVP_PKEY_public_check() function. This will most likely lead to an\napplication crash. This function can be called on public keys supplied\nfrom untrusted sources which could allow an attacker to cause a denial of\nservice attack. The TLS implementation in OpenSSL does not call this\nfunction but applications might call the function if there are additional\nsecurity requirements imposed by standards such as FIPS 140-3.\n(CVE-2023-0217)\n\nThere is a type confusion vulnerability relating to X.400 address\nprocessing inside an X.509 GeneralName. X.400 addresses were parsed as an\nASN1_STRING but the public structure definition for GENERAL_NAME\nincorrectly specified the type of the x400Address field as ASN1_TYPE. This\nfield is subsequently interpreted by the OpenSSL function GENERAL_NAME_cmp\nas an ASN1_TYPE rather than an ASN1_STRING. When CRL checking is enabled\n(i.e. the application sets the X509_V_FLAG_CRL_CHECK flag), this\nvulnerability may allow an attacker to pass arbitrary pointers to a memcmp\ncall, enabling them to read memory contents or enact a denial of service.\nIn most cases, the attack requires the attacker to provide both the\ncertificate chain and CRL, neither of which need to have a valid\nsignature. If the attacker only controls one of these inputs, the other\ninput must already contain an X.400 address as a CRL distribution point,\nwhich is uncommon. As such, this vulnerability is most likely to only\naffect applications which have implemented their own functionality for\nretrieving CRLs over a network. (CVE-2023-0286)\n\nA NULL pointer can be dereferenced when signatures are being verified on\nPKCS7 signed or signedAndEnveloped data. In case the hash algorithm used\nfor the signature is known to the OpenSSL library but the implementation\nof the hash algorithm is not available the digest initialization will\nfail. There is a missing check for the return value from the\ninitialization function which later leads to invalid usage of the digest\nAPI most likely leading to a crash. The unavailability of an algorithm can\nbe caused by using FIPS enabled configuration of providers or more\ncommonly by not loading the legacy provider. PKCS7 data is processed by\nthe SMIME library calls and also by the time stamp (TS) library calls. The\nTLS implementation in OpenSSL does not call these functions however third\nparty applications would be affected if they call these functions to\nverify signatures on untrusted data. (CVE-2023-0401)\n\nA security vulnerability has been identified in all supported versions of\nOpenSSL related to the verification of X.509 certificate chains that\ninclude policy constraints. Attackers may be able to exploit this\nvulnerability by creating a malicious certificate chain that triggers\nexponential use of computational resources, leading to a denial-of-service\n(DoS) attack on affected systems. Policy processing is disabled by default\nbut can be enabled by passing the `-policy' argument to the command line\nutilities or by calling the `X509_VERIFY_PARAM_set1_policies()' function.\n(CVE-2023-0464)\n\nApplications that use a non-default option when verifying certificates may\nbe vulnerable to an attack from a malicious CA to circumvent certain\nchecks. Invalid certificate policies in leaf certificates are silently\nignored by OpenSSL and other certificate policy checks are skipped for\nthat certificate. A malicious CA could use this to deliberately assert\ninvalid certificate policies in order to circumvent policy checking on the\ncertificate altogether. Policy processing is disabled by default but can\nbe enabled by passing the `-policy' argument to the command line utilities\nor by calling the `X509_VERIFY_PARAM_set1_policies()' function. (CVE-2023-0465)\n\nThe function X509_VERIFY_PARAM_add0_policy() is documented to implicitly\nenable the certificate policy check when doing certificate verification.\nHowever the implementation of the function does not enable the check which\nallows certificates with invalid or incorrect policies to pass the\ncertificate verification. As suddenly enabling the policy check could\nbreak existing deployments it was decided to keep the existing behavior of\nthe X509_VERIFY_PARAM_add0_policy() function. Instead the applications\nthat require OpenSSL to perform certificate policy check need to use\nX509_VERIFY_PARAM_set1_policies() or explicitly enable the policy check by\ncalling X509_VERIFY_PARAM_set_flags() with the X509_V_FLAG_POLICY_CHECK\nflag argument. Certificate policy checks are disabled by default in\nOpenSSL and are not commonly used by applications. (CVE-2023-0466)\n","status":"published","published":"2023-04-11T19:02:20Z","modified":"2026-04-16T04:40:45.664071043Z","updated_at":"2026-11-02T15:49:42.263076Z"},{"id":"openSUSE-SU-2024:12837-1","title":"libopenssl-1_0_0-devel-1.0.2u-15.1 on GA media","description":"These are all security issues fixed in the libopenssl-1_0_0-devel-1.0.2u-15.1 package on the GA media of openSUSE Tumbleweed.","status":"published","published":"2024-06-15T00:00:00Z","modified":"2026-02-04T03:56:11.585521Z","updated_at":"2026-11-02T16:58:36.025801Z"},{"id":"openSUSE-SU-2024:12842-1","title":"libopenssl-1_1-devel-1.1.1t-3.1 on GA media","description":"These are all security issues fixed in the libopenssl-1_1-devel-1.1.1t-3.1 package on the GA media of openSUSE Tumbleweed.","status":"published","published":"2024-06-15T00:00:00Z","modified":"2026-02-04T03:16:17.53918Z","updated_at":"2026-11-02T16:58:36.025801Z"},{"id":"openSUSE-SU-2024:12969-1","title":"libopenssl-3-devel-3.1.1-1.1 on GA media","description":"These are all security issues fixed in the libopenssl-3-devel-3.1.1-1.1 package on the GA media of openSUSE Tumbleweed.","status":"published","published":"2024-06-15T00:00:00Z","modified":"2026-02-04T03:29:36.257627Z","updated_at":"2026-11-02T16:58:36.025801Z"},{"id":"SUSE-SU-2023:1790-1","title":"Security update for openssl-1_1","description":"This update for openssl-1_1 fixes the following issues:\n\n- CVE-2023-0464: Fixed excessive Resource Usage Verifying X.509 Policy Constraints (bsc#1209624).\n- CVE-2023-0465: Invalid certificate policies in leaf certificates were silently ignored (bsc#1209878).\n- CVE-2023-0466: Certificate policy check were not enabled (bsc#1209873).\n","status":"published","published":"2023-04-06T13:36:45Z","modified":"2026-02-04T04:39:21.301141Z","updated_at":"2026-11-02T15:53:52.350754Z"},{"id":"SUSE-SU-2023:1794-1","title":"Security update for openssl-1_1","description":"This update for openssl-1_1 fixes the following issues:\n\n- CVE-2023-0465: Invalid certificate policies in leaf certificates were silently ignored (bsc#1209878).\n- CVE-2023-0466: Certificate policy check were not enabled (bsc#1209873).\n","status":"published","published":"2023-04-07T09:06:07Z","modified":"2026-02-04T04:19:29.965971Z","updated_at":"2026-11-02T15:53:52.350754Z"},{"id":"SUSE-SU-2023:1898-1","title":"Security update for openssl-3","description":"This update for openssl-3 fixes the following issues:\n\n- CVE-2023-0465: Invalid certificate policies in leaf certificates were silently ignored (bsc#1209878).\n- CVE-2023-0466: Certificate policy check were not enabled (bsc#1209873).\n- Update further expiring certificates that affect tests (bsc#1210060)\n","status":"published","published":"2023-04-18T11:11:27Z","modified":"2026-02-04T02:34:58.442347Z","updated_at":"2026-11-02T15:53:52.350754Z"},{"id":"SUSE-SU-2023:1907-1","title":"Security update for openssl","description":"This update for openssl fixes the following issues:\n\n- CVE-2023-0465: Invalid certificate policies in leaf certificates were silently ignored (bsc#1209878).\n- CVE-2023-0466: Certificate policy check were not enabled (bsc#1209873).\n","status":"published","published":"2023-04-19T06:38:03Z","modified":"2026-02-04T02:28:31.390668Z","updated_at":"2026-11-02T15:53:52.350754Z"},{"id":"SUSE-SU-2023:1908-1","title":"Security update for openssl-1_1","description":"This update for openssl-1_1 fixes the following issues:\n\n- CVE-2023-0465: Fixed ignored invalid certificate policies in leaf certificates (bsc#1209878).\n- CVE-2023-0466: Fixed disabled certificate policy check (bsc#1209873).\n","status":"published","published":"2023-04-19T06:39:00Z","modified":"2026-02-04T03:56:45.456026Z","updated_at":"2026-11-02T15:53:52.350754Z"},{"id":"SUSE-SU-2023:1911-1","title":"Security update for openssl-1_1","description":"This update for openssl-1_1 fixes the following issues:\n\n- CVE-2023-0465: Invalid certificate policies in leaf certificates were silently ignored (bsc#1209878).\n- CVE-2023-0466: Certificate policy check were not enabled (bsc#1209873).\n","status":"published","published":"2023-04-19T11:02:42Z","modified":"2026-02-04T04:32:01.720673Z","updated_at":"2026-11-02T15:53:52.350754Z"},{"id":"SUSE-SU-2023:1912-1","title":"Security update for compat-openssl098","description":"This update for compat-openssl098 fixes the following issues:\n\n- CVE-2023-0465: Invalid certificate policies in leaf certificates were silently ignored (bsc#1209878).\n","status":"published","published":"2023-04-19T11:24:59Z","modified":"2026-02-04T04:33:09.057292Z","updated_at":"2026-11-02T15:53:52.350754Z"},{"id":"SUSE-SU-2023:1914-1","title":"Security update for openssl-1_0_0","description":"This update for openssl-1_0_0 fixes the following issues:\n\n- CVE-2023-0465: Invalid certificate policies in leaf certificates were silently ignored (bsc#1209878).\n- CVE-2023-0466: Certificate policy check were not enabled (bsc#1209873).\n","status":"published","published":"2023-04-19T12:24:32Z","modified":"2026-02-04T04:26:49.362857Z","updated_at":"2026-11-02T15:53:52.350754Z"},{"id":"SUSE-SU-2023:1922-1","title":"Security update for openssl-1_0_0","description":"This update for openssl-1_0_0 fixes the following issues:\n\n- CVE-2023-0465: Invalid certificate policies in leaf certificates were silently ignored (bsc#1209878).\n- CVE-2023-0466: Certificate policy check were not enabled (bsc#1209873).\n","status":"published","published":"2023-04-19T17:54:57Z","modified":"2026-02-04T02:28:54.731074Z","updated_at":"2026-11-02T15:53:52.350754Z"},{"id":"SUSE-SU-2023:1926-1","title":"Security update for openssl1","description":"This update for openssl1 fixes the following issues:\n\n- CVE-2023-0465: Invalid certificate policies in leaf certificates were silently ignored (bsc#1209878).\n- CVE-2023-0466: Certificate policy check were not enabled (bsc#1209873).\n","status":"published","published":"2023-04-20T07:01:56Z","modified":"2026-02-04T04:21:35.232075Z","updated_at":"2026-11-02T15:53:52.350754Z"},{"id":"SUSE-SU-2023:1960-1","title":"Security update for openssl","description":"This update for openssl fixes the following issues:\n\n- CVE-2023-0465: Invalid certificate policies in leaf certificates were silently ignored (bsc#1209878).\n","status":"published","published":"2023-04-24T11:41:58Z","modified":"2026-02-04T04:05:47.454625Z","updated_at":"2026-11-02T15:53:52.350754Z"},{"id":"USN-7894-1","title":"edk2 vulnerabilities","description":"It was discovered that EDK II was susceptible to a predictable TCP Initial\nSequence Number. An attacker could possibly use this issue to gain\nunauthorized access. This issue only affected Ubuntu 22.04 LTS, and Ubuntu\n24.04 LTS. (CVE-2023-45236, CVE-2023-45237)\n\nIt was discovered that EDK II incorrectly handled S3 sleep. An attacker\ncould possibly use this issue to cause a denial of service. This issue only\naffected Ubuntu 22.04 LTS, and Ubuntu 24.04 LTS. (CVE-2024-1298)\n\nIt was discovered that the EDK II PE/COFF loader incorrectly handled\ncertain memory operations. An attacker could possibly use this issue to\ncause a denial of service, obtain sensitive information, or execute\narbitrary code. This issue only affected Ubuntu 22.04 LTS, and Ubuntu\n24.04 LTS. (CVE-2024-38796)\n\nIt was discovered that the EDK II PE image hashing function incorrectly\nhandled certain memory operations. An attacker could possibly use this\nissue to cause a denial of service, or execute arbitrary code.\n(CVE-2024-38797)\n\nIt was discovered that the EDK II BIOS incorrectly handled certain memory\noperations. An attacker could possibly use this issue to cause a denial of\nservice. (CVE-2024-38805, CVE-2025-2295)\n\nIt was discovered that EDK II incorrectly handled the enabling of MCE. An\nattacker could possibly use this issue to cause a denial of service, or\nexecute arbitrary code. (CVE-2025-3770)\n\nIt was discovered that the OpenSSL library embedded in EDK II contained\nmultiple vulnerabilties. An attacker could possibly use these issues to\ncause a denial of service, obtain sensitive information, or execute\narbitrary code. (CVE-2021-3712, CVE-2022-0778, CVE-2022-4304,\nCVE-2022-4450, CVE-2023-0215, CVE-2023-0286, CVE-2023-0464, CVE-2023-0465,\nCVE-2023-0466, CVE-2023-2650, CVE-2023-3446, CVE-2023-3817, CVE-2023-5678,\nCVE-2023-6237, CVE-2024-0727, CVE-2024-13176, CVE-2024-2511,\nCVE-2024-41996, CVE-2024-4741, CVE-2024-5535, CVE-2024-6119, CVE-2024-9143,\nCVE-2025-9232)","status":"published","published":"2025-11-26T15:05:43Z","modified":"2026-11-09T12:46:35.954753636Z","updated_at":"2026-11-09T12:55:09.79476Z"}]}}