{"id":"CVE-2024-12797","aliases":["ALPINE-CVE-2024-12797","ALSA-2025:1330","AZL-56723","AZL-56761","AZL-56774","AZL-78591","BELL-CVE-2024-12797","CLSA-2025-1750637629","CLSA-2025-1750637631","CLSA-2025-1751550314","CLSA-2025-1752624830","CLSA-2025-1759277628","CLSA-2026-1772151044","DEBIAN-CVE-2024-12797","EUVD-2024-51115","GHSA-79v4-65xg-pq4g","GHSA-h4gh-qq45-vh27","PYSEC-2026-1284","RHBA-2025:6314","RHSA-2025:1330","RLSA-2025:1330","ROOT-APP-PYPI-CVE-2024-12797","ROOT-OS-ALPINE-318-CVE-2024-12797","SUSE-SU-2025:02042-1","UBUNTU-CVE-2024-12797","openSUSE-SU-2025:14802-1"],"status":"published","title":"RFC7250 handshakes with unauthenticated servers don't abort as expected","description":"Issue summary: Clients using RFC7250 Raw Public Keys (RPKs) to authenticate a\nserver may fail to notice that the server was not authenticated, because\nhandshakes don't abort as expected when the SSL_VERIFY_PEER verification mode\nis set.\n\nImpact summary: TLS and DTLS connections using raw public keys may be\nvulnerable to man-in-middle attacks when server authentication failure is not\ndetected by clients.\n\nRPKs are disabled by default in both TLS clients and TLS servers.  The issue\nonly arises when TLS clients explicitly enable RPK use by the server, and the\nserver, likewise, enables sending of an RPK instead of an X.509 certificate\nchain.  The affected clients are those that then rely on the handshake to\nfail when the server's RPK fails to match one of the expected public keys,\nby setting the verification mode to SSL_VERIFY_PEER.\n\nClients that enable server-side raw public keys can still find out that raw\npublic key verification failed by calling SSL_get_verify_result(), and those\nthat do, and take appropriate action, are not affected.  This issue was\nintroduced in the initial implementation of RPK support in OpenSSL 3.2.\n\nThe FIPS modules in 3.4, 3.3, 3.2, 3.1 and 3.0 are not affected by this issue.","severity":{"version":"3.1","score":7.4,"vector":"CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N","level":"high","assessor":"adp","from":"cve"},"epss":{"day":"2026-11-10","score":0.01857,"percentile":0.79374,"model":"v2026.06.15"},"facts":{"in_kev":false,"known_exploited":false,"public_exploit":false,"fix_available":true},"cwes":["CWE-1395","CWE-392"],"published":"2024-09-03T21:59:48Z","modified":"2026-11-07T09:30:02Z","fixes":[{"ecosystem":"PyPI","package":"cryptography","fixed_in":["44.0.1","43.0.1"],"sources":["ghsa","osv"]},{"ecosystem":"Alpine:v3.20","package":"openssl","fixed_in":["3.3.3-r0"],"sources":["osv"]},{"ecosystem":"Alpine:v3.21","package":"openssl","fixed_in":["3.3.3-r0"],"sources":["osv"]},{"ecosystem":"Alpine:v3.22","package":"openssl","fixed_in":["3.3.3-r0"],"sources":["osv"]},{"ecosystem":"Alpine:v3.23","package":"openssl","fixed_in":["3.3.3-r0"],"sources":["osv"]},{"ecosystem":"Alpine:v3.24","package":"openssl","fixed_in":["3.3.3-r0"],"sources":["osv"]},{"ecosystem":"AlmaLinux:9","package":"openssl","fixed_in":["1:3.2.2-6.el9_5.1"],"sources":["osv"]},{"ecosystem":"AlmaLinux:9","package":"openssl-devel","fixed_in":["1:3.2.2-6.el9_5.1"],"sources":["osv"]},{"ecosystem":"AlmaLinux:9","package":"openssl-libs","fixed_in":["1:3.2.2-6.el9_5.1"],"sources":["osv"]},{"ecosystem":"AlmaLinux:9","package":"openssl-perl","fixed_in":["1:3.2.2-6.el9_5.1"],"sources":["osv"]},{"ecosystem":"Azure Linux:2","package":"cloud-hypervisor-cvm","fixed_in":["38.0.72.2-5"],"sources":["osv"]},{"ecosystem":"Azure Linux:3","package":"openssl","fixed_in":["3.3.3-1"],"sources":["osv"]},{"ecosystem":"Alpaquita:stream","package":"openssl","fixed_in":["3.3.3-r0"],"sources":["osv"]},{"ecosystem":"BellSoft Hardened Containers:stream","package":"openssl","fixed_in":["3.3.3-r0"],"sources":["osv"]},{"ecosystem":"TuxCare:PyPI","package":"cryptography","fixed_in":["42.0.8.post1+tuxcare","43.0.3.post1+tuxcare","43.0.1.post1+tuxcare","3.4.8.post3+tuxcare"],"sources":["osv"]},{"ecosystem":"TuxCare:AlmaLinux:9.6","package":"openssl","fixed_in":["1:3.2.2-6.el9_6.1.tuxcare.6"],"sources":["osv"]},{"ecosystem":"TuxCare:AlmaLinux:9.6","package":"openssl-devel","fixed_in":["1:3.2.2-6.el9_6.1.tuxcare.6"],"sources":["osv"]},{"ecosystem":"TuxCare:AlmaLinux:9.6","package":"openssl-libs","fixed_in":["1:3.2.2-6.el9_6.1.tuxcare.6"],"sources":["osv"]},{"ecosystem":"TuxCare:AlmaLinux:9.6","package":"openssl-perl","fixed_in":["1:3.2.2-6.el9_6.1.tuxcare.6"],"sources":["osv"]},{"ecosystem":"Debian:13","package":"openssl","fixed_in":["3.4.1-1"],"sources":["osv"]},{"ecosystem":"Debian:14","package":"openssl","fixed_in":["3.4.1-1"],"sources":["osv"]},{"ecosystem":"Red Hat:enterprise_linux:10.0","package":"openssl-debuginfo","fixed_in":["1:3.2.2-16.el10"],"sources":["osv"]},{"ecosystem":"Red Hat:enterprise_linux:10.0","package":"openssl-debugsource","fixed_in":["1:3.2.2-16.el10"],"sources":["osv"]},{"ecosystem":"Red Hat:enterprise_linux:10.0","package":"openssl-devel","fixed_in":["1:3.2.2-16.el10"],"sources":["osv"]},{"ecosystem":"Red Hat:enterprise_linux:10.0","package":"openssl-libs-debuginfo","fixed_in":["1:3.2.2-16.el10"],"sources":["osv"]},{"ecosystem":"Red Hat:enterprise_linux:10.0","package":"openssl-perl","fixed_in":["1:3.2.2-16.el10"],"sources":["osv"]},{"ecosystem":"Red Hat:enterprise_linux:10.0","package":"openssl","fixed_in":["1:3.2.2-16.el10"],"sources":["osv"]},{"ecosystem":"Red Hat:enterprise_linux:10.0","package":"openssl-libs","fixed_in":["1:3.2.2-16.el10"],"sources":["osv"]},{"ecosystem":"Red Hat:enterprise_linux:9::appstream","package":"openssl-debuginfo","fixed_in":["1:3.2.2-6.el9_5.1"],"sources":["osv"]},{"ecosystem":"Red Hat:enterprise_linux:9::appstream","package":"openssl-debugsource","fixed_in":["1:3.2.2-6.el9_5.1"],"sources":["osv"]},{"ecosystem":"Red Hat:enterprise_linux:9::appstream","package":"openssl-devel","fixed_in":["1:3.2.2-6.el9_5.1"],"sources":["osv"]},{"ecosystem":"Red Hat:enterprise_linux:9::appstream","package":"openssl-libs-debuginfo","fixed_in":["1:3.2.2-6.el9_5.1"],"sources":["osv"]},{"ecosystem":"Red Hat:enterprise_linux:9::appstream","package":"openssl-perl","fixed_in":["1:3.2.2-6.el9_5.1"],"sources":["osv"]},{"ecosystem":"Red Hat:enterprise_linux:9::baseos","package":"openssl","fixed_in":["1:3.2.2-6.el9_5.1"],"sources":["osv"]},{"ecosystem":"Red Hat:enterprise_linux:9::baseos","package":"openssl-debuginfo","fixed_in":["1:3.2.2-6.el9_5.1"],"sources":["osv"]},{"ecosystem":"Red Hat:enterprise_linux:9::baseos","package":"openssl-debugsource","fixed_in":["1:3.2.2-6.el9_5.1"],"sources":["osv"]},{"ecosystem":"Red Hat:enterprise_linux:9::baseos","package":"openssl-libs","fixed_in":["1:3.2.2-6.el9_5.1"],"sources":["osv"]},{"ecosystem":"Red Hat:enterprise_linux:9::baseos","package":"openssl-libs-debuginfo","fixed_in":["1:3.2.2-6.el9_5.1"],"sources":["osv"]},{"ecosystem":"Rocky Linux:9","package":"openssl","fixed_in":["1:3.2.2-6.el9_5.1"],"sources":["osv"]},{"ecosystem":"Root:PyPI","package":"cryptography","fixed_in":["43.0.1+aikido.7","43.0.1+aikido.3","43.0.1+aikido.8","43.0.1+aikido.4","43.0.1+aikido.5","43.0.1+aikido.6","43.0.1+aikido.9"],"sources":["osv"]},{"ecosystem":"Root:Alpine:3.18","package":"openssl","fixed_in":["3.1.8-r00072","3.1.8-r00071","3.1.8-r00073","3.1.8-r00074"],"sources":["osv"]},{"ecosystem":"Root:Alpine:3.18","package":"rootio-openssl","fixed_in":["3.1.8-r00072","3.1.8-r00071","3.1.8-r00073","3.1.8-r00074"],"sources":["osv"]},{"ecosystem":"openSUSE:Tumbleweed","package":"openssl-3","fixed_in":["3.2.4-1.1"],"sources":["osv"]}],"affected":[{"source":"ghsa","ecosystem":"PyPI","package":"cryptography","ranges":[{"type":"ECOSYSTEM","events":[{"introduced":"42.0.0"},{"fixed":"44.0.1"}]}]},{"source":"ghsa","ecosystem":"PyPI","package":"cryptography","ranges":[{"type":"ECOSYSTEM","events":[{"introduced":"37.0.0"},{"fixed":"43.0.1"}]}]},{"source":"osv","ecosystem":"Alpine:v3.20","package":"openssl","ranges":[{"type":"ECOSYSTEM","events":[{"introduced":"3.2.0"},{"fixed":"3.3.3-r0"}]}]},{"source":"osv","ecosystem":"Alpine:v3.21","package":"openssl","ranges":[{"type":"ECOSYSTEM","events":[{"introduced":"3.2.0"},{"fixed":"3.3.3-r0"}]}]},{"source":"osv","ecosystem":"Alpine:v3.22","package":"openssl","ranges":[{"type":"ECOSYSTEM","events":[{"introduced":"3.2.0"},{"fixed":"3.3.3-r0"}]}]},{"source":"osv","ecosystem":"Alpine:v3.23","package":"openssl","ranges":[{"type":"ECOSYSTEM","events":[{"introduced":"3.2.0"},{"fixed":"3.3.3-r0"}]}]},{"source":"osv","ecosystem":"Alpine:v3.24","package":"openssl","ranges":[{"type":"ECOSYSTEM","events":[{"introduced":"3.2.0"},{"fixed":"3.3.3-r0"}]}]},{"source":"osv","ecosystem":"AlmaLinux:9","package":"openssl","ranges":[{"type":"ECOSYSTEM","events":[{"introduced":"0"},{"fixed":"1:3.2.2-6.el9_5.1"}]}]},{"source":"osv","ecosystem":"AlmaLinux:9","package":"openssl-devel","ranges":[{"type":"ECOSYSTEM","events":[{"introduced":"0"},{"fixed":"1:3.2.2-6.el9_5.1"}]}]},{"source":"osv","ecosystem":"AlmaLinux:9","package":"openssl-libs","ranges":[{"type":"ECOSYSTEM","events":[{"introduced":"0"},{"fixed":"1:3.2.2-6.el9_5.1"}]}]},{"source":"osv","ecosystem":"AlmaLinux:9","package":"openssl-perl","ranges":[{"type":"ECOSYSTEM","events":[{"introduced":"0"},{"fixed":"1:3.2.2-6.el9_5.1"}]}]},{"source":"osv","ecosystem":"Azure Linux:2","package":"cloud-hypervisor-cvm","ranges":[{"type":"ECOSYSTEM","events":[{"introduced":"0"},{"fixed":"38.0.72.2-5"}]}]},{"source":"osv","ecosystem":"Azure Linux:3","package":"openssl","ranges":[{"type":"ECOSYSTEM","events":[{"introduced":"0"},{"fixed":"3.3.3-1"}]}]},{"source":"osv","ecosystem":"Azure Linux:3","package":"openssl-fips-provider","ranges":[{"type":"ECOSYSTEM","events":[{"introduced":"0"},{"last_affected":"3.1.2-2"}]}]},{"source":"osv","ecosystem":"Alpaquita:stream","package":"openssl","ranges":[{"type":"ECOSYSTEM","events":[{"introduced":"3.2.1-r0"},{"fixed":"3.3.3-r0"}]}]},{"source":"osv","ecosystem":"BellSoft Hardened Containers:stream","package":"openssl","ranges":[{"type":"ECOSYSTEM","events":[{"introduced":"3.2.1-r0"},{"fixed":"3.3.3-r0"}]}]},{"source":"osv","ecosystem":"TuxCare:PyPI","package":"cryptography","ranges":[{"type":"ECOSYSTEM","events":[{"introduced":"42.0.8"},{"fixed":"42.0.8.post1+tuxcare"}]}],"versions":["42.0.8"]},{"source":"osv","ecosystem":"TuxCare:PyPI","package":"cryptography","ranges":[{"type":"ECOSYSTEM","events":[{"introduced":"43.0.3"},{"fixed":"43.0.3.post1+tuxcare"}]}],"versions":["43.0.3"]},{"source":"osv","ecosystem":"TuxCare:AlmaLinux:9.6","package":"openssl","ranges":[{"type":"ECOSYSTEM","events":[{"introduced":"0"},{"fixed":"1:3.2.2-6.el9_6.1.tuxcare.6"}]}]},{"source":"osv","ecosystem":"TuxCare:AlmaLinux:9.6","package":"openssl-devel","ranges":[{"type":"ECOSYSTEM","events":[{"introduced":"0"},{"fixed":"1:3.2.2-6.el9_6.1.tuxcare.6"}]}]},{"source":"osv","ecosystem":"TuxCare:AlmaLinux:9.6","package":"openssl-libs","ranges":[{"type":"ECOSYSTEM","events":[{"introduced":"0"},{"fixed":"1:3.2.2-6.el9_6.1.tuxcare.6"}]}]},{"source":"osv","ecosystem":"TuxCare:AlmaLinux:9.6","package":"openssl-perl","ranges":[{"type":"ECOSYSTEM","events":[{"introduced":"0"},{"fixed":"1:3.2.2-6.el9_6.1.tuxcare.6"}]}]},{"source":"osv","ecosystem":"TuxCare:PyPI","package":"cryptography","ranges":[{"type":"ECOSYSTEM","events":[{"introduced":"43.0.1"},{"fixed":"43.0.1.post1+tuxcare"}]}],"versions":["43.0.1"]},{"source":"osv","ecosystem":"TuxCare:PyPI","package":"cryptography","ranges":[{"type":"ECOSYSTEM","events":[{"introduced":"42.0.0"},{"fixed":"42.0.0.post1+tuxcare"}]}],"versions":["42.0.0"],"bundled":2},{"source":"osv","ecosystem":"TuxCare:PyPI","package":"cryptography","ranges":[{"type":"ECOSYSTEM","events":[{"introduced":"3.4.8"},{"fixed":"3.4.8.post3+tuxcare"}]}],"versions":["3.4.8","3.4.8.post1+tuxcare","3.4.8.post2+tuxcare"]},{"source":"osv","ecosystem":"Debian:13","package":"openssl","ranges":[{"type":"ECOSYSTEM","events":[{"introduced":"0"},{"fixed":"3.4.1-1"}]}]},{"source":"osv","ecosystem":"Debian:14","package":"openssl","ranges":[{"type":"ECOSYSTEM","events":[{"introduced":"0"},{"fixed":"3.4.1-1"}]}]},{"source":"osv","ecosystem":"PyPI","package":"cryptography","ranges":[{"type":"ECOSYSTEM","events":[{"introduced":"42.0.0"},{"fixed":"44.0.1"}]}],"versions":["42.0.0","42.0.1","42.0.2","42.0.3","42.0.4","42.0.5","42.0.6","42.0.7","42.0.8","43.0.0","43.0.1","43.0.3","44.0.0"]},{"source":"osv","ecosystem":"PyPI","package":"cryptography","ranges":[{"type":"ECOSYSTEM","events":[{"introduced":"37.0.0"},{"fixed":"43.0.1"}]}],"versions":["37.0.0","37.0.1","37.0.2","37.0.3","37.0.4","38.0.0","38.0.1","38.0.2","38.0.3","38.0.4","39.0.0","39.0.1","39.0.2","40.0.0","40.0.1","40.0.2","41.0.0","41.0.1","41.0.2","41.0.3","41.0.4","41.0.5","41.0.6","41.0.7","42.0.0","42.0.1","42.0.2","42.0.3","42.0.4","42.0.5","42.0.6","42.0.7","42.0.8","43.0.0"]},{"source":"osv","ecosystem":"PyPI","package":"cryptography","ranges":[{"type":"ECOSYSTEM","events":[{"introduced":"42.0.0"},{"fixed":"44.0.1"}]}],"versions":["42.0.0","42.0.1","42.0.2","42.0.3","42.0.4","42.0.5","42.0.6","42.0.7","42.0.8","43.0.0","43.0.1","43.0.3","44.0.0"]},{"source":"osv","ecosystem":"Red Hat:enterprise_linux:10.0","package":"openssl-debuginfo","ranges":[{"type":"ECOSYSTEM","events":[{"introduced":"0"},{"fixed":"1:3.2.2-16.el10"}]}]},{"source":"osv","ecosystem":"Red Hat:enterprise_linux:10.0","package":"openssl-debugsource","ranges":[{"type":"ECOSYSTEM","events":[{"introduced":"0"},{"fixed":"1:3.2.2-16.el10"}]}]},{"source":"osv","ecosystem":"Red Hat:enterprise_linux:10.0","package":"openssl-devel","ranges":[{"type":"ECOSYSTEM","events":[{"introduced":"0"},{"fixed":"1:3.2.2-16.el10"}]}]},{"source":"osv","ecosystem":"Red Hat:enterprise_linux:10.0","package":"openssl-libs-debuginfo","ranges":[{"type":"ECOSYSTEM","events":[{"introduced":"0"},{"fixed":"1:3.2.2-16.el10"}]}]},{"source":"osv","ecosystem":"Red Hat:enterprise_linux:10.0","package":"openssl-perl","ranges":[{"type":"ECOSYSTEM","events":[{"introduced":"0"},{"fixed":"1:3.2.2-16.el10"}]}]},{"source":"osv","ecosystem":"Red Hat:enterprise_linux:10.0","package":"openssl","ranges":[{"type":"ECOSYSTEM","events":[{"introduced":"0"},{"fixed":"1:3.2.2-16.el10"}]}]},{"source":"osv","ecosystem":"Red Hat:enterprise_linux:10.0","package":"openssl-libs","ranges":[{"type":"ECOSYSTEM","events":[{"introduced":"0"},{"fixed":"1:3.2.2-16.el10"}]}]},{"source":"osv","ecosystem":"Red Hat:enterprise_linux:9::appstream","package":"openssl-debuginfo","ranges":[{"type":"ECOSYSTEM","events":[{"introduced":"0"},{"fixed":"1:3.2.2-6.el9_5.1"}]}]},{"source":"osv","ecosystem":"Red Hat:enterprise_linux:9::appstream","package":"openssl-debugsource","ranges":[{"type":"ECOSYSTEM","events":[{"introduced":"0"},{"fixed":"1:3.2.2-6.el9_5.1"}]}]},{"source":"osv","ecosystem":"Red Hat:enterprise_linux:9::appstream","package":"openssl-devel","ranges":[{"type":"ECOSYSTEM","events":[{"introduced":"0"},{"fixed":"1:3.2.2-6.el9_5.1"}]}]},{"source":"osv","ecosystem":"Red Hat:enterprise_linux:9::appstream","package":"openssl-libs-debuginfo","ranges":[{"type":"ECOSYSTEM","events":[{"introduced":"0"},{"fixed":"1:3.2.2-6.el9_5.1"}]}]},{"source":"osv","ecosystem":"Red Hat:enterprise_linux:9::appstream","package":"openssl-perl","ranges":[{"type":"ECOSYSTEM","events":[{"introduced":"0"},{"fixed":"1:3.2.2-6.el9_5.1"}]}]},{"source":"osv","ecosystem":"Red Hat:enterprise_linux:9::baseos","package":"openssl","ranges":[{"type":"ECOSYSTEM","events":[{"introduced":"0"},{"fixed":"1:3.2.2-6.el9_5.1"}]}]},{"source":"osv","ecosystem":"Red Hat:enterprise_linux:9::baseos","package":"openssl-debuginfo","ranges":[{"type":"ECOSYSTEM","events":[{"introduced":"0"},{"fixed":"1:3.2.2-6.el9_5.1"}]}]},{"source":"osv","ecosystem":"Red Hat:enterprise_linux:9::baseos","package":"openssl-debugsource","ranges":[{"type":"ECOSYSTEM","events":[{"introduced":"0"},{"fixed":"1:3.2.2-6.el9_5.1"}]}]},{"source":"osv","ecosystem":"Red Hat:enterprise_linux:9::baseos","package":"openssl-libs","ranges":[{"type":"ECOSYSTEM","events":[{"introduced":"0"},{"fixed":"1:3.2.2-6.el9_5.1"}]}]},{"source":"osv","ecosystem":"Red Hat:enterprise_linux:9::baseos","package":"openssl-libs-debuginfo","ranges":[{"type":"ECOSYSTEM","events":[{"introduced":"0"},{"fixed":"1:3.2.2-6.el9_5.1"}]}]},{"source":"osv","ecosystem":"Rocky Linux:9","package":"openssl","ranges":[{"type":"ECOSYSTEM","events":[{"introduced":"0"},{"fixed":"1:3.2.2-6.el9_5.1"}]}]},{"source":"osv","ecosystem":"Root:PyPI","package":"cryptography","ranges":[{"type":"ECOSYSTEM","events":[{"introduced":"0"},{"fixed":"43.0.1+aikido.7"},{"fixed":"43.0.1+aikido.3"},{"fixed":"43.0.1+aikido.8"},{"fixed":"43.0.1+aikido.4"},{"fixed":"43.0.1+aikido.5"},{"fixed":"43.0.1+aikido.6"},{"fixed":"43.0.1+aikido.9"}]}]},{"source":"osv","ecosystem":"Root:Alpine:3.18","package":"openssl","ranges":[{"type":"ECOSYSTEM","events":[{"introduced":"0"},{"fixed":"3.1.8-r00072"},{"fixed":"3.1.8-r00071"},{"fixed":"3.1.8-r00073"},{"fixed":"3.1.8-r00074"}]}]},{"source":"osv","ecosystem":"Root:Alpine:3.18","package":"rootio-openssl","ranges":[{"type":"ECOSYSTEM","events":[{"introduced":"0"},{"fixed":"3.1.8-r00072"},{"fixed":"3.1.8-r00071"},{"fixed":"3.1.8-r00073"},{"fixed":"3.1.8-r00074"}]}]},{"source":"osv","ecosystem":"SUSE:Linux Enterprise Module for Basesystem 15 SP7","package":"openssl-3","ranges":[{"type":"ECOSYSTEM","events":[{"introduced":"0"},{"fixed":"3.2.3-150700.5.5.1"}]}],"bundled":3},{"source":"osv","ecosystem":"openSUSE:Tumbleweed","package":"openssl-3","ranges":[{"type":"ECOSYSTEM","events":[{"introduced":"0"},{"fixed":"3.2.4-1.1"}]}]}],"products":[{"vendor":"netapp","product":"bootstrap_os"},{"vendor":"netapp","product":"brocade_fabric_operating_system"},{"vendor":"netapp","product":"h300s_firmware"},{"vendor":"netapp","product":"h410c_firmware"},{"vendor":"netapp","product":"h410s_firmware"},{"vendor":"netapp","product":"h500s_firmware"},{"vendor":"netapp","product":"h610c_firmware"},{"vendor":"netapp","product":"h610s_firmware"},{"vendor":"netapp","product":"h615c_firmware"},{"vendor":"netapp","product":"h700s_firmware"},{"vendor":"netapp","product":"snapmanager"},{"vendor":"openssl","product":"openssl"}],"references":[{"url":"https://openssl-library.org/news/secadv/20250211.txt","tags":["vendor-advisory","Vendor Advisory","advisory","web","article","report"]},{"url":"https://github.com/openssl/openssl/commit/738d4f9fdeaad57660dcba50a619fafced3fd5e9","tags":["patch","Patch","fix","web"]},{"url":"https://github.com/openssl/openssl/commit/87ebd203feffcf92ad5889df92f90bb0ee10a699","tags":["patch","Patch","fix","web"]},{"url":"https://github.com/openssl/openssl/commit/798779d43494549b611233f92652f0da5328fbe7","tags":["patch","Patch","fix","web"]},{"url":"http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2025/02/11/3","tags":["Mailing List","Third Party Advisory","web"]},{"url":"http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2025/02/11/4","tags":["Mailing List","Third Party Advisory","web"]},{"url":"https://security.netapp.com/advisory/ntap-20250214-0001/","tags":["Third Party Advisory","advisory"]},{"url":"https://github.com/pyca/cryptography/security/advisories/GHSA-79v4-65xg-pq4g","tags":["web"]},{"url":"https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-12797","tags":["web","advisory"]},{"url":"https://github.com/advisories/GHSA-79v4-65xg-pq4g","tags":["advisory"]},{"url":"https://github.com/pyca/cryptography/security/advisories/GHSA-h4gh-qq45-vh27","tags":["web"]},{"url":"https://openssl-library.org/news/secadv/20240903.txt","tags":["web"]},{"url":"https://github.com/advisories/GHSA-h4gh-qq45-vh27"},{"url":"https://security.alpinelinux.org/vuln/CVE-2024-12797","tags":["advisory"]},{"url":"https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2025:1330","tags":["advisory"]},{"url":"https://access.redhat.com/security/cve/CVE-2024-12797","tags":["report"]},{"url":"https://bugzilla.redhat.com/2342757","tags":["report"]},{"url":"https://errata.almalinux.org/9/ALSA-2025-1330.html","tags":["advisory"]},{"url":"https://docs.bell-sw.com/security/cves/CVE-2024-12797","tags":["advisory"]},{"url":"https://errata.tuxcare.com/els_os/tuxcare9.6esu/CLSA-2025-1751550314.html","tags":["advisory"]},{"url":"https://github.com/CVEProject/cvelistV5/tree/main/cves/2024/12xxx/CVE-2024-12797.json","tags":["advisory"]},{"url":"https://security-tracker.debian.org/tracker/CVE-2024-12797","tags":["advisory"]},{"url":"https://github.com/pyca/cryptography","tags":["package"]},{"url":"https://pypi.org/project/cryptography","tags":["package"]},{"url":"https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2025:6314","tags":["advisory"]},{"url":"https://docs.redhat.com/en/documentation/red_hat_enterprise_linux/10/html/10.0_release_notes/index","tags":["article"]},{"url":"https://issues.redhat.com/browse/RHEL-58178","tags":["article"]},{"url":"https://issues.redhat.com/browse/RHEL-66163","tags":["article"]},{"url":"https://issues.redhat.com/browse/RHEL-71132","tags":["article"]},{"url":"https://issues.redhat.com/browse/RHEL-71903","tags":["article"]},{"url":"https://issues.redhat.com/browse/RHEL-73170","tags":["article"]},{"url":"https://issues.redhat.com/browse/RHEL-76182","tags":["article"]},{"url":"https://issues.redhat.com/browse/RHEL-79045","tags":["article"]},{"url":"https://security.access.redhat.com/data/csaf/v2/advisories/2025/rhba-2025_6314.json","tags":["advisory"]},{"url":"https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2342757","tags":["report"]},{"url":"https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-12797","tags":["advisory","report"]},{"url":"https://access.redhat.com/security/updates/classification/#important","tags":["article"]},{"url":"https://security.access.redhat.com/data/csaf/v2/advisories/2025/rhsa-2025_1330.json","tags":["advisory"]},{"url":"https://errata.rockylinux.org/RLSA-2025:1330","tags":["advisory"]},{"url":"https://www.suse.com/support/update/announcement/2025/suse-su-202502042-1/","tags":["advisory"]},{"url":"https://bugzilla.suse.com/1236136","tags":["report"]},{"url":"https://bugzilla.suse.com/1236599","tags":["report"]},{"url":"https://bugzilla.suse.com/1243459","tags":["report"]},{"url":"https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2024-12797","tags":["web"]},{"url":"https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2024-13176","tags":["web"]},{"url":"https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2025-27587","tags":["web"]},{"url":"https://ubuntu.com/security/CVE-2024-12797","tags":["report"]},{"url":"https://ubuntu.com/security/notices/USN-7264-1","tags":["advisory"]},{"url":"","tags":["advisory"]}],"sources":{"cve":[{"id":"CVE-2024-12797","title":"RFC7250 handshakes with unauthenticated servers don't abort as expected","description":"Issue summary: Clients using RFC7250 Raw Public Keys (RPKs) to authenticate a\nserver may fail to notice that the server was not authenticated, because\nhandshakes don't abort as expected when the SSL_VERIFY_PEER verification mode\nis set.\n\nImpact summary: TLS and DTLS connections using raw public keys may be\nvulnerable to man-in-middle attacks when server authentication failure is not\ndetected by clients.\n\nRPKs are disabled by default in both TLS clients and TLS servers.  The issue\nonly arises when TLS clients explicitly enable RPK use by the server, and the\nserver, likewise, enables sending of an RPK instead of an X.509 certificate\nchain.  The affected clients are those that then rely on the handshake to\nfail when the server's RPK fails to match one of the expected public keys,\nby setting the verification mode to SSL_VERIFY_PEER.\n\nClients that enable server-side raw public keys can still find out that raw\npublic key verification failed by calling SSL_get_verify_result(), and those\nthat do, and take appropriate action, are not affected.  This issue was\nintroduced in the initial implementation of RPK support in OpenSSL 3.2.\n\nThe FIPS modules in 3.4, 3.3, 3.2, 3.1 and 3.0 are not affected by this issue.","status":"published","published":"2025-02-11T15:59:36.719Z","modified":"2026-11-06T21:37:19.575Z","cvss":[{"version":"3.1","score":7.4,"vector":"CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N","level":"high","assessor":"adp"}],"cwes":["CWE-392"],"updated_at":"2026-11-06T22:31:26.121Z"}],"euvd":[{"id":"EUVD-2024-51115","description":"Issue summary: Clients using RFC7250 Raw Public Keys (RPKs) to authenticate a\nserver may fail to notice that the server was not authenticated, because\nhandshakes don't abort as expected when the SSL_VERIFY_PEER verification mode\nis set.\n\nImpact summary: TLS and DTLS connections using raw public keys may be\nvulnerable to man-in-middle attacks when server authentication failure is not\ndetected by clients.\n\nRPKs are disabled by default in both TLS clients and TLS servers.  The issue\nonly arises when TLS clients explicitly enable RPK use by the server, and the\nserver, likewise, enables sending of an RPK instead of an X.509 certificate\nchain.  The affected clients are those that then rely on the handshake to\nfail when the server's RPK fails to match one of the expected public keys,\nby setting the verification mode to SSL_VERIFY_PEER.\n\nClients that enable server-side raw public keys can still find out that raw\npublic key verification failed by calling SSL_get_verify_result(), and those\nthat do, and take appropriate action, are not affected.  This issue was\nintroduced in the initial implementation of RPK support in OpenSSL 3.2.\n\nThe FIPS modules in 3.4, 3.3, 3.2, 3.1 and 3.0 are not affected by this issue.","status":"published","published":"2025-02-11T15:59:36Z","modified":"2026-11-06T21:37:19Z","cvss":[{"version":"3.1","score":7.4,"vector":"CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N","level":"high"}],"updated_at":"2026-11-06T23:07:29.923788Z"}],"ghsa":[{"id":"GHSA-79v4-65xg-pq4g","title":"Vulnerable OpenSSL included in cryptography wheels","description":"pyca/cryptography's wheels include a statically linked copy of OpenSSL. The versions of OpenSSL included in cryptography 42.0.0-44.0.0 are vulnerable to a security issue. More details about the vulnerability itself can be found in https://openssl-library.org/news/secadv/20250211.txt.\n\nIf you are building cryptography source (\"sdist\") then you are responsible for upgrading your copy of OpenSSL. Only users installing from wheels built by the cryptography project (i.e., those distributed on PyPI) need to update their cryptography versions.","status":"published","published":"2025-02-11T18:06:42Z","modified":"2025-02-12T18:20:08Z","cwes":["CWE-392","CWE-1395"],"updated_at":"2026-11-02T14:38:30.754382Z"},{"id":"GHSA-h4gh-qq45-vh27","title":"pyca/cryptography has a vulnerable OpenSSL included in cryptography wheels","description":"pyca/cryptography's wheels include a statically linked copy of OpenSSL. The versions of OpenSSL included in cryptography 37.0.0-43.0.0 are vulnerable to a security issue. More details about the vulnerability itself can be found in https://openssl-library.org/news/secadv/20240903.txt.\n\nIf you are building cryptography source (\"sdist\") then you are responsible for upgrading your copy of OpenSSL. Only users installing from wheels built by the cryptography project (i.e., those distributed on PyPI) need to update their cryptography versions.\n","status":"published","published":"2024-09-03T21:59:48Z","modified":"2024-09-03T21:59:48Z","cwes":["CWE-1395"],"updated_at":"2026-11-02T14:38:00.257632Z"}],"nvd":[{"id":"CVE-2024-12797","description":"Issue summary: Clients using RFC7250 Raw Public Keys (RPKs) to authenticate a\nserver may fail to notice that the server was not authenticated, because\nhandshakes don't abort as expected when the SSL_VERIFY_PEER verification mode\nis set.\n\nImpact summary: TLS and DTLS connections using raw public keys may be\nvulnerable to man-in-middle attacks when server authentication failure is not\ndetected by clients.\n\nRPKs are disabled by default in both TLS clients and TLS servers.  The issue\nonly arises when TLS clients explicitly enable RPK use by the server, and the\nserver, likewise, enables sending of an RPK instead of an X.509 certificate\nchain.  The affected clients are those that then rely on the handshake to\nfail when the server's RPK fails to match one of the expected public keys,\nby setting the verification mode to SSL_VERIFY_PEER.\n\nClients that enable server-side raw public keys can still find out that raw\npublic key verification failed by calling SSL_get_verify_result(), and those\nthat do, and take appropriate action, are not affected.  This issue was\nintroduced in the initial implementation of RPK support in OpenSSL 3.2.\n\nThe FIPS modules in 3.4, 3.3, 3.2, 3.1 and 3.0 are not affected by this issue.","status":"published","published":"2025-02-11T16:15:38.827Z","modified":"2026-11-06T22:18:41.713Z","cvss":[{"version":"3.1","score":7.4,"vector":"CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N","level":"high","assessor":"secondary"}],"cwes":["CWE-392"],"updated_at":"2026-11-07T00:02:30.5596Z"}],"osv":[{"id":"ALPINE-CVE-2024-12797","description":"Issue summary: Clients using RFC7250 Raw Public Keys (RPKs) to authenticate a\nserver may fail to notice that the server was not authenticated, because\nhandshakes don't abort as expected when the SSL_VERIFY_PEER verification mode\nis set.\n\nImpact summary: TLS and DTLS connections using raw public keys may be\nvulnerable to man-in-middle attacks when server authentication failure is not\ndetected by clients.\n\nRPKs are disabled by default in both TLS clients and TLS servers.  The issue\nonly arises when TLS clients explicitly enable RPK use by the server, and the\nserver, likewise, enables sending of an RPK instead of an X.509 certificate\nchain.  The affected clients are those that then rely on the handshake to\nfail when the server's RPK fails to match one of the expected public keys,\nby setting the verification mode to SSL_VERIFY_PEER.\n\nClients that enable server-side raw public keys can still find out that raw\npublic key verification failed by calling SSL_get_verify_result(), and those\nthat do, and take appropriate action, are not affected.  This issue was\nintroduced in the initial implementation of RPK support in OpenSSL 3.2.\n\nThe FIPS modules in 3.4, 3.3, 3.2, 3.1 and 3.0 are not affected by this issue.","status":"published","published":"2025-02-11T16:15:38.827Z","modified":"2026-11-07T09:30:02.883780957Z","cvss":[{"version":"3.1","score":7.4,"vector":"CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N","level":"high"}],"updated_at":"2026-11-07T09:42:35.936113Z"},{"id":"BELL-CVE-2024-12797","status":"published","published":"2025-02-12T05:57:11.276653Z","modified":"2026-11-08T07:15:02.281452062Z","cvss":[{"version":"3.1","score":7.4,"vector":"CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N","level":"high"}],"updated_at":"2026-11-08T07:31:51.445015Z"},{"id":"CVE-2024-12797","title":"RFC7250 handshakes with unauthenticated servers don't abort as expected","description":"Issue summary: Clients using RFC7250 Raw Public Keys (RPKs) to authenticate a\nserver may fail to notice that the server was not authenticated, because\nhandshakes don't abort as expected when the SSL_VERIFY_PEER verification mode\nis set.\n\nImpact summary: TLS and DTLS connections using raw public keys may be\nvulnerable to man-in-middle attacks when server authentication failure is not\ndetected by clients.\n\nRPKs are disabled by default in both TLS clients and TLS servers.  The issue\nonly arises when TLS clients explicitly enable RPK use by the server, and the\nserver, likewise, enables sending of an RPK instead of an X.509 certificate\nchain.  The affected clients are those that then rely on the handshake to\nfail when the server's RPK fails to match one of the expected public keys,\nby setting the verification mode to SSL_VERIFY_PEER.\n\nClients that enable server-side raw public keys can still find out that raw\npublic key verification failed by calling SSL_get_verify_result(), and those\nthat do, and take appropriate action, are not affected.  This issue was\nintroduced in the initial implementation of RPK support in OpenSSL 3.2.\n\nThe FIPS modules in 3.4, 3.3, 3.2, 3.1 and 3.0 are not affected by this issue.","status":"published","published":"2025-02-11T15:59:36.719Z","modified":"2026-11-11T13:28:54.586389664Z","cvss":[{"version":"3.1","score":7.4,"vector":"CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N","level":"high"}],"cwes":["CWE-392"],"updated_at":"2026-11-07T11:15:38.581573Z"},{"id":"DEBIAN-CVE-2024-12797","description":"Issue summary: Clients using RFC7250 Raw Public Keys (RPKs) to authenticate a server may fail to notice that the server was not authenticated, because handshakes don't abort as expected when the SSL_VERIFY_PEER verification mode is set.  Impact summary: TLS and DTLS connections using raw public keys may be vulnerable to man-in-middle attacks when server authentication failure is not detected by clients.  RPKs are disabled by default in both TLS clients and TLS servers.  The issue only arises when TLS clients explicitly enable RPK use by the server, and the server, likewise, enables sending of an RPK instead of an X.509 certificate chain.  The affected clients are those that then rely on the handshake to fail when the server's RPK fails to match one of the expected public keys, by setting the verification mode to SSL_VERIFY_PEER.  Clients that enable server-side raw public keys can still find out that raw public key verification failed by calling SSL_get_verify_result(), and those that do, and take appropriate action, are not affected.  This issue was introduced in the initial implementation of RPK support in OpenSSL 3.2.  The FIPS modules in 3.4, 3.3, 3.2, 3.1 and 3.0 are not affected by this issue.","status":"published","published":"2025-02-11T16:15:38.827Z","modified":"2026-11-07T10:00:09.228559443Z","cvss":[{"version":"3.1","score":7.4,"vector":"CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N","level":"high"}],"updated_at":"2026-11-07T10:14:19.880839Z"},{"id":"RHBA-2025:6314","title":"Red Hat Bug Fix Advisory: openssl bug fix and enhancement update","status":"published","published":"2025-07-30T10:02:23Z","modified":"2026-09-06T10:02:45Z","cvss":[{"version":"3.1","score":7.4,"vector":"CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N","level":"high"}],"updated_at":"2026-11-02T15:52:58.636919Z"},{"id":"RHSA-2025:1330","title":"Red Hat Security Advisory: openssl security update","status":"published","published":"2025-02-12T10:04:16Z","modified":"2026-09-06T10:03:44Z","cvss":[{"version":"3.1","score":7.4,"vector":"CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N","level":"high"}],"updated_at":"2026-11-02T15:53:15.599955Z"},{"id":"RLSA-2025:1330","title":"Important: openssl security update","description":"OpenSSL is a toolkit that implements the Secure Sockets Layer (SSL) and Transport Layer Security (TLS) protocols, as well as a full-strength general-purpose cryptography library.\n\nSecurity Fix(es):\n\n* openssl: RFC7250 handshakes with unauthenticated servers don't abort as expected (CVE-2024-12797)\n\nFor more details about the security issue(s), including the impact, a CVSS score, acknowledgments, and other related information, refer to the CVE page(s) listed in the References section.","status":"published","published":"2025-03-17T20:16:43.608626Z","modified":"2025-10-09T06:18:54.253357Z","cvss":[{"version":"3.1","score":7.4,"vector":"CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N","level":"high"}],"updated_at":"2026-11-02T15:53:24.923365Z"},{"id":"UBUNTU-CVE-2024-12797","description":"Issue summary: Clients using RFC7250 Raw Public Keys (RPKs) to authenticate a server may fail to notice that the server was not authenticated, because handshakes don't abort as expected when the SSL_VERIFY_PEER verification mode is set. Impact summary: TLS and DTLS connections using raw public keys may be vulnerable to man-in-middle attacks when server authentication failure is not detected by clients. RPKs are disabled by default in both TLS clients and TLS servers.  The issue only arises when TLS clients explicitly enable RPK use by the server, and the server, likewise, enables sending of an RPK instead of an X.509 certificate chain.  The affected clients are those that then rely on the handshake to fail when the server's RPK fails to match one of the expected public keys, by setting the verification mode to SSL_VERIFY_PEER. Clients that enable server-side raw public keys can still find out that raw public key verification failed by calling SSL_get_verify_result(), and those that do, and take appropriate action, are not affected.  This issue was introduced in the initial implementation of RPK support in OpenSSL 3.2. The FIPS modules in 3.4, 3.3, 3.2, 3.1 and 3.0 are not affected by this issue.","status":"withdrawn","published":"2025-02-11T00:00:00Z","modified":"2026-02-04T04:19:16.734256Z","cvss":[{"version":"3.1","score":6.3,"vector":"CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L","level":"medium"}],"updated_at":"2026-11-02T16:54:41.555387Z"},{"id":"ALSA-2025:1330","title":"Important: openssl security update","description":"OpenSSL is a toolkit that implements the Secure Sockets Layer (SSL) and Transport Layer Security (TLS) protocols, as well as a full-strength general-purpose cryptography library.  \n\nSecurity Fix(es):  \n\n  * openssl: RFC7250 handshakes with unauthenticated servers don't abort as expected (CVE-2024-12797)\n\n\nFor more details about the security issue(s), including the impact, a CVSS score, acknowledgments, and other related information, refer to the CVE page(s) listed in the References section.\n","status":"published","published":"2025-02-11T00:00:00Z","modified":"2026-10-29T11:32:27.512476454Z","updated_at":"2026-11-02T15:27:53.030731Z"},{"id":"AZL-56723","title":"CVE-2024-12797 for package cloud-hypervisor-cvm is not applicable","description":"This CVE either no longer is or was never applicable.","status":"withdrawn","published":"2026-04-21T04:36:12.84616Z","modified":"2026-04-21T04:47:13.262236Z","updated_at":"2026-11-02T15:28:07.209678Z"},{"id":"AZL-56761","title":"CVE-2024-12797 affecting package cloud-hypervisor-cvm for versions less than 38.0.72.2-5","description":"Issue summary: Clients using RFC7250 Raw Public Keys (RPKs) to authenticate a\nserver may fail to notice that the server was not authenticated, because\nhandshakes don't abort as expected when the SSL_VERIFY_PEER verification mode\nis set.\n\nImpact summary: TLS and DTLS connections using raw public keys may be\nvulnerable to man-in-middle attacks when server authentication failure is not\ndetected by clients.\n\nRPKs are disabled by default in both TLS clients and TLS servers.  The issue\nonly arises when TLS clients explicitly enable RPK use by the server, and the\nserver, likewise, enables sending of an RPK instead of an X.509 certificate\nchain.  The affected clients are those that then rely on the handshake to\nfail when the server's RPK fails to match one of the expected public keys,\nby setting the verification mode to SSL_VERIFY_PEER.\n\nClients that enable server-side raw public keys can still find out that raw\npublic key verification failed by calling SSL_get_verify_result(), and those\nthat do, and take appropriate action, are not affected.  This issue was\nintroduced in the initial implementation of RPK support in OpenSSL 3.2.\n\nThe FIPS modules in 3.4, 3.3, 3.2, 3.1 and 3.0 are not affected by this issue.","status":"published","published":"2025-02-11T16:15:38Z","modified":"2026-04-21T04:36:13.168579Z","updated_at":"2026-11-02T15:28:07.209678Z"},{"id":"AZL-56774","title":"CVE-2024-12797 affecting package openssl for versions less than 3.3.3-1","description":"Issue summary: Clients using RFC7250 Raw Public Keys (RPKs) to authenticate a\nserver may fail to notice that the server was not authenticated, because\nhandshakes don't abort as expected when the SSL_VERIFY_PEER verification mode\nis set.\n\nImpact summary: TLS and DTLS connections using raw public keys may be\nvulnerable to man-in-middle attacks when server authentication failure is not\ndetected by clients.\n\nRPKs are disabled by default in both TLS clients and TLS servers.  The issue\nonly arises when TLS clients explicitly enable RPK use by the server, and the\nserver, likewise, enables sending of an RPK instead of an X.509 certificate\nchain.  The affected clients are those that then rely on the handshake to\nfail when the server's RPK fails to match one of the expected public keys,\nby setting the verification mode to SSL_VERIFY_PEER.\n\nClients that enable server-side raw public keys can still find out that raw\npublic key verification failed by calling SSL_get_verify_result(), and those\nthat do, and take appropriate action, are not affected.  This issue was\nintroduced in the initial implementation of RPK support in OpenSSL 3.2.\n\nThe FIPS modules in 3.4, 3.3, 3.2, 3.1 and 3.0 are not affected by this issue.","status":"published","published":"2025-02-11T16:15:38Z","modified":"2026-06-27T05:26:09Z","updated_at":"2026-11-02T15:28:07.209678Z"},{"id":"AZL-78591","title":"CVE-2024-12797 affecting package openssl-fips-provider 3.1.2-2","description":"Issue summary: Clients using RFC7250 Raw Public Keys (RPKs) to authenticate a\nserver may fail to notice that the server was not authenticated, because\nhandshakes don't abort as expected when the SSL_VERIFY_PEER verification mode\nis set.\n\nImpact summary: TLS and DTLS connections using raw public keys may be\nvulnerable to man-in-middle attacks when server authentication failure is not\ndetected by clients.\n\nRPKs are disabled by default in both TLS clients and TLS servers.  The issue\nonly arises when TLS clients explicitly enable RPK use by the server, and the\nserver, likewise, enables sending of an RPK instead of an X.509 certificate\nchain.  The affected clients are those that then rely on the handshake to\nfail when the server's RPK fails to match one of the expected public keys,\nby setting the verification mode to SSL_VERIFY_PEER.\n\nClients that enable server-side raw public keys can still find out that raw\npublic key verification failed by calling SSL_get_verify_result(), and those\nthat do, and take appropriate action, are not affected.  This issue was\nintroduced in the initial implementation of RPK support in OpenSSL 3.2.\n\nThe FIPS modules in 3.4, 3.3, 3.2, 3.1 and 3.0 are not affected by this issue.","status":"published","published":"2025-02-11T16:15:38Z","modified":"2026-11-05T05:36:30Z","updated_at":"2026-11-05T16:41:24.800038Z"},{"id":"CLSA-2025-1750637629","title":"TuxCare security update for cryptography (2 CVEs)","description":"TuxCare rebuilt cryptography to address 2 CVEs. Fixed in 42.0.8.post1+tuxcare.","status":"published","published":"2026-08-04T14:52:10Z","modified":"2026-10-20T13:45:18.466681559Z","updated_at":"2026-11-02T15:43:41.66212Z"},{"id":"CLSA-2025-1750637631","title":"TuxCare security update for cryptography (1 CVE)","description":"TuxCare rebuilt cryptography to address 1 CVE. Fixed in 43.0.3.post1+tuxcare.","status":"published","published":"2026-08-04T14:52:11Z","modified":"2026-10-20T13:45:18.468090722Z","updated_at":"2026-11-02T15:43:41.66212Z"},{"id":"CLSA-2025-1751550314","title":"openssl: Fix of CVE-2024-12797","description":"- RFC7250 handshakes with unauthenticated servers don't abort as expected (CVE-2024-12797)\n  Resolves: RHEL-76755","status":"published","published":"2026-05-08T10:36:29Z","modified":"2026-06-01T00:32:35.034658896Z","updated_at":"2026-11-02T15:43:41.66212Z"},{"id":"CLSA-2025-1752624830","title":"TuxCare security update for cryptography (1 CVE)","description":"TuxCare rebuilt cryptography to address 1 CVE. Fixed in 43.0.1.post1+tuxcare.","status":"published","published":"2026-08-04T14:52:10Z","modified":"2026-10-20T13:45:18.51429619Z","updated_at":"2026-11-02T15:43:42.025438Z"},{"id":"CLSA-2025-1759277628","title":"TuxCare security update for cryptography (2 CVEs)","description":"TuxCare rebuilt cryptography to address 2 CVEs. Fixed in 42.0.0.post1+tuxcare.","status":"published","published":"2026-08-04T14:52:10Z","modified":"2026-10-20T13:58:25.964762739Z","updated_at":"2026-11-02T15:43:42.427288Z"},{"id":"CLSA-2026-1772151044","title":"TuxCare security update for cryptography (1 CVE)","description":"TuxCare rebuilt cryptography to address 1 CVE. Fixed in 3.4.8.post3+tuxcare.","status":"published","published":"2026-08-04T14:52:08Z","modified":"2026-10-15T09:47:41.999365004Z","updated_at":"2026-11-02T15:43:43.249928Z"},{"id":"GHSA-79v4-65xg-pq4g","title":"Vulnerable OpenSSL included in cryptography wheels","description":"pyca/cryptography's wheels include a statically linked copy of OpenSSL. The versions of OpenSSL included in cryptography 42.0.0-44.0.0 are vulnerable to a security issue. More details about the vulnerability itself can be found in https://openssl-library.org/news/secadv/20250211.txt.\n\nIf you are building cryptography source (\"sdist\") then you are responsible for upgrading your copy of OpenSSL. Only users installing from wheels built by the cryptography project (i.e., those distributed on PyPI) need to update their cryptography versions.","status":"published","published":"2025-02-11T18:06:42Z","modified":"2026-09-10T03:50:22.501671988Z","cwes":["CWE-1395","CWE-392"],"updated_at":"2026-11-02T15:46:41.002603Z"},{"id":"GHSA-h4gh-qq45-vh27","title":"pyca/cryptography has a vulnerable OpenSSL included in cryptography wheels","description":"pyca/cryptography's wheels include a statically linked copy of OpenSSL. The versions of OpenSSL included in cryptography 37.0.0-43.0.0 are vulnerable to a security issue. More details about the vulnerability itself can be found in https://openssl-library.org/news/secadv/20240903.txt.\n\nIf you are building cryptography source (\"sdist\") then you are responsible for upgrading your copy of OpenSSL. Only users installing from wheels built by the cryptography project (i.e., those distributed on PyPI) need to update their cryptography versions.\n","status":"published","published":"2024-09-03T21:59:48Z","modified":"2026-09-10T03:50:18.241644273Z","cwes":["CWE-1395"],"updated_at":"2026-11-02T15:46:48.546324Z"},{"id":"openSUSE-SU-2025:14802-1","title":"libopenssl-3-devel-3.2.4-1.1 on GA media","description":"These are all security issues fixed in the libopenssl-3-devel-3.2.4-1.1 package on the GA media of openSUSE Tumbleweed.","status":"published","published":"2025-02-12T00:00:00Z","modified":"2026-02-04T02:34:56.600077Z","updated_at":"2026-11-02T16:58:37.399567Z"},{"id":"PYSEC-2026-1284","title":"Vulnerable OpenSSL included in cryptography wheels","description":"pyca/cryptography's wheels include a statically linked copy of OpenSSL. The versions of OpenSSL included in cryptography 42.0.0-44.0.0 are vulnerable to a security issue. More details about the vulnerability itself can be found in https://openssl-library.org/news/secadv/20250211.txt.\n\nIf you are building cryptography source (\"sdist\") then you are responsible for upgrading your copy of OpenSSL. Only users installing from wheels built by the cryptography project (i.e., those distributed on PyPI) need to update their cryptography versions.","status":"published","published":"2026-07-07T14:34:49.574389Z","modified":"2026-07-07T17:47:34.798935568Z","updated_at":"2026-11-02T15:52:54.622769Z"},{"id":"ROOT-APP-PYPI-CVE-2024-12797","title":"CVE-2024-12797 in cryptography - Patched by Root","description":"Root has patched CVE-2024-12797 in the cryptography package for Root:PyPI. Multiple fixed versions available.","status":"published","published":"2026-10-05T17:24:37Z","modified":"2026-10-05T18:15:03.244726118Z","updated_at":"2026-11-02T15:53:27.940619Z"},{"id":"ROOT-OS-ALPINE-318-CVE-2024-12797","title":"CVE-2024-12797 in openssl - Patched by Root","description":"Root has patched CVE-2024-12797 in the openssl package for Root:Alpine:3.18. Multiple fixed versions available.","status":"published","published":"2026-09-29T10:19:54Z","modified":"2026-09-29T11:15:10.106263977Z","updated_at":"2026-11-02T15:53:28.259095Z"},{"id":"SUSE-SU-2025:02042-1","title":"Security update for openssl-3","description":"This update for openssl-3 fixes the following issues:\n\n- CVE-2025-27587: timing side-channel vulnerability in the P-384 implementation when used with ECDSA (bsc#1243459).\n- CVE-2024-12797: Fixed that RFC7250 handshakes with unauthenticated servers don't abort as expected. (bsc#1236599)\n- CVE-2024-13176: Fixed timing side-channel in ECDSA signature computation (bsc#1236136)\n","status":"published","published":"2025-06-20T10:38:46Z","modified":"2026-03-23T04:49:33.848739Z","updated_at":"2026-11-02T15:53:56.647031Z"}]}}