{"id":"CVE-2024-24567","aliases":["EUVD-2024-0178","GHSA-x2c2-q32w-4w6m","PYSEC-2024-151"],"status":"published","title":"raw_call `value=` kwargs not disabled for static and delegate calls","description":"Vyper is a pythonic Smart Contract Language for the ethereum virtual machine. Vyper compiler allows passing a value in builtin raw_call even if the call is a delegatecall or a staticcall. But in the context of delegatecall and staticcall the handling of value is not possible due to the semantics of the respective opcodes, and vyper will silently ignore the value= argument. If the semantics of the EVM are unknown to the developer, he could suspect that by specifying the `value` kwarg, exactly the given amount will be sent along to the target. This vulnerability affects 0.3.10 and earlier versions.","severity":{"version":"3.1","score":4.8,"vector":"CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:L","level":"medium","assessor":"cna","from":"cve"},"epss":{"day":"2026-11-10","score":0.00485,"percentile":0.42068,"model":"v2026.06.15"},"facts":{"in_kev":false,"known_exploited":false,"public_exploit":false,"fix_available":true},"cwes":["CWE-754"],"published":"2024-01-30T18:42:28Z","modified":"2026-10-28T02:30:53Z","fixes":[{"ecosystem":"PyPI","package":"vyper","fixed_in":["0.4.0","0.4.0b1"],"sources":["ghsa","osv"]}],"affected":[{"source":"ghsa","ecosystem":"PyPI","package":"vyper","ranges":[{"type":"ECOSYSTEM","events":[{"introduced":"0"},{"fixed":"0.4.0"}]}]},{"source":"osv","ecosystem":"PyPI","package":"vyper","ranges":[{"type":"ECOSYSTEM","events":[{"introduced":"0"},{"fixed":"0.4.0"}]}],"versions":["0.1.0b1","0.1.0b10","0.1.0b11","0.1.0b12","0.1.0b13","0.1.0b14","0.1.0b15","0.1.0b16","0.1.0b17","0.1.0b2","0.1.0b3","0.1.0b4","0.1.0b5","0.1.0b6","0.1.0b7","0.1.0b8","0.1.0b9","0.2.1","0.2.10","0.2.11","0.2.12","0.2.13","0.2.14","0.2.15","0.2.16","0.2.2","0.2.3","0.2.4","0.2.5","0.2.6","0.2.7","0.2.8","0.2.9","0.3.0","0.3.1","0.3.10","0.3.10rc1","0.3.10rc2","0.3.10rc3","0.3.10rc4","0.3.10rc5","0.3.2","0.3.3","0.3.4","0.3.5","0.3.6","0.3.7","0.3.8","0.3.9","0.4.0b1","0.4.0b2","0.4.0b3","0.4.0b4","0.4.0b5","0.4.0b6","0.4.0rc1","0.4.0rc2","0.4.0rc3","0.4.0rc4","0.4.0rc5","0.4.0rc6"]},{"source":"osv","ecosystem":"PyPI","package":"vyper","ranges":[{"type":"ECOSYSTEM","events":[{"introduced":"0"},{"fixed":"0.4.0b1"}]}],"versions":["0.1.0b1","0.1.0b10","0.1.0b11","0.1.0b12","0.1.0b13","0.1.0b14","0.1.0b15","0.1.0b16","0.1.0b17","0.1.0b2","0.1.0b3","0.1.0b4","0.1.0b5","0.1.0b6","0.1.0b7","0.1.0b8","0.1.0b9","0.2.1","0.2.10","0.2.11","0.2.12","0.2.13","0.2.14","0.2.15","0.2.16","0.2.2","0.2.3","0.2.4","0.2.5","0.2.6","0.2.7","0.2.8","0.2.9","0.3.0","0.3.1","0.3.10","0.3.10rc1","0.3.10rc2","0.3.10rc3","0.3.10rc4","0.3.10rc5","0.3.2","0.3.3","0.3.4","0.3.5","0.3.6","0.3.7","0.3.8","0.3.9"]}],"products":[{"vendor":"vyperlang","product":"vyper"}],"references":[{"url":"https://github.com/vyperlang/vyper/security/advisories/GHSA-x2c2-q32w-4w6m","tags":["x_refsource_CONFIRM","x_transferred","Exploit","Vendor Advisory","advisory","web"]},{"url":"https://github.com/vyperlang/vyper/blob/9136169468f317a53b4e7448389aa315f90b95ba/vyper/builtins/functions.py#L1100","tags":["x_refsource_MISC","x_transferred","Exploit","web","evidence"]},{"url":"https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-24567","tags":["advisory"]},{"url":"https://github.com/vyperlang/vyper/pull/3755","tags":["web"]},{"url":"https://github.com/vyperlang/vyper/commit/a2df08888c318713742c57f71465f32a1c27ed72","tags":["web"]},{"url":"https://github.com/pypa/advisory-database/tree/main/vulns/vyper/PYSEC-2024-151.yaml","tags":["web"]},{"url":"https://github.com/advisories/GHSA-x2c2-q32w-4w6m"},{"url":"https://github.com/CVEProject/cvelistV5/tree/main/cves/2024/24xxx/CVE-2024-24567.json","tags":["advisory"]},{"url":"https://github.com/vyperlang/vyper","tags":["package"]}],"sources":{"cve":[{"id":"CVE-2024-24567","title":"raw_call `value=` kwargs not disabled for static and delegate calls","description":"Vyper is a pythonic Smart Contract Language for the ethereum virtual machine. Vyper compiler allows passing a value in builtin raw_call even if the call is a delegatecall or a staticcall. But in the context of delegatecall and staticcall the handling of value is not possible due to the semantics of the respective opcodes, and vyper will silently ignore the value= argument. If the semantics of the EVM are unknown to the developer, he could suspect that by specifying the `value` kwarg, exactly the given amount will be sent along to the target. This vulnerability affects 0.3.10 and earlier versions.","status":"published","published":"2024-01-30T20:17:53.955Z","modified":"2025-06-16T18:48:26.606Z","cvss":[{"version":"3.1","score":4.8,"vector":"CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:L","level":"medium","assessor":"cna"}],"cwes":["CWE-754"],"updated_at":"2026-11-02T14:34:13.991836Z"}],"euvd":[{"id":"EUVD-2024-0178","description":"Vyper is a pythonic Smart Contract Language for the ethereum virtual machine. Vyper compiler allows passing a value in builtin raw_call even if the call is a delegatecall or a staticcall. But in the context of delegatecall and staticcall the handling of value is not possible due to the semantics of the respective opcodes, and vyper will silently ignore the value= argument. If the semantics of the EVM are unknown to the developer, he could suspect that by specifying the `value` kwarg, exactly the given amount will be sent along to the target. This vulnerability affects 0.3.10 and earlier versions.","status":"published","published":"2024-01-30T20:17:53Z","modified":"2025-06-16T18:48:26Z","cvss":[{"version":"3.1","score":4.8,"vector":"CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:L","level":"medium"}],"updated_at":"2026-11-02T20:32:23.224988Z"}],"ghsa":[{"id":"GHSA-x2c2-q32w-4w6m","title":"Vyper's raw_call `value=` kwargs not disabled for static and delegate calls","description":"### Summary\nVyper compiler allows passing a value in builtin `raw_call` even if the call is a `delegatecall` or a `staticcall`. But in the context of `delegatecall` and `staticcall` the handling of value is not possible due to the semantics of the respective opcodes, and vyper will silently ignore the `value=` argument.\n\nA contract search was performed and no vulnerable contracts were found in production.\n\n### Details\nThe IR for `raw_call` is built in the `RawCall` class:\nhttps://github.com/vyperlang/vyper/blob/9136169468f317a53b4e7448389aa315f90b95ba/vyper/builtins/functions.py#L1100\n\nHowever, the compiler doesn't validate that if either `delegatecall` or `staticall` are provided as kwargs, that `value` wasn't set. For example, the following compiles without errors:\n```python\nraw_call(self, call_data2, max_outsize=255, is_delegate_call=True, value=msg.value/2)\n```\n\n### Impact\nIf the semantics of the EVM are unknown to the developer, he could suspect that by specifying the `value` kwarg, exactly the given amount will be sent along to the target. However in fact, no `value` will be sent.\n\nHere is an example of an potentially problematic implementation of multicall utilizing the `raw_call` built-in:\n```python\nvalue_accumulator: uint256 = empty(uint256)\n    results: DynArray[Result, max_value(uint8)] = []\n    return_data: Bytes[max_value(uint8)] = b\"\"\n    success: bool = empty(bool)\n    for batch in data:\n        msg_value: uint256 = batch.value\n        value_accumulator = unsafe_add(value_accumulator, msg_value)\n        if (batch.allow_failure == False):\n            return_data = raw_call(self, batch.call_data, max_outsize=255, value=msg_value, is_delegate_call=True)\n            success = True\n            results.append(Result({success: success, return_data: return_data}))\n        else:\n            success, return_data = \\\n                raw_call(self, batch.call_data, max_outsize=255, value=msg_value, is_delegate_call=True, revert_on_failure=False)\n            results.append(Result({success: success, return_data: return_data}))\n    assert msg.value == value_accumulator, \"Multicall: value mismatch\"\n    return results\n```\n\n### Patches\nFixed in https://github.com/vyperlang/vyper/pull/3755\n### Workarounds\n_Is there a way for users to fix or remediate the vulnerability without upgrading?_\n\n### References\n_Are there any links users can visit to find out more?_\n","status":"published","published":"2024-01-30T18:42:28Z","modified":"2024-11-22T20:46:33Z","cvss":[{"version":"3.1","score":4.8,"vector":"CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:L","level":"medium"}],"cwes":["CWE-754"],"updated_at":"2026-11-02T14:38:22.774145Z"}],"nvd":[{"id":"CVE-2024-24567","description":"Vyper is a pythonic Smart Contract Language for the ethereum virtual machine. Vyper compiler allows passing a value in builtin raw_call even if the call is a delegatecall or a staticcall. But in the context of delegatecall and staticcall the handling of value is not possible due to the semantics of the respective opcodes, and vyper will silently ignore the value= argument. If the semantics of the EVM are unknown to the developer, he could suspect that by specifying the `value` kwarg, exactly the given amount will be sent along to the target. This vulnerability affects 0.3.10 and earlier versions.","status":"published","published":"2024-01-30T21:15:08.607Z","modified":"2026-06-17T07:14:37.34Z","cvss":[{"version":"3.1","score":4.8,"vector":"CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:L","level":"medium","assessor":"secondary"},{"version":"3.1","score":5.3,"vector":"CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N","level":"medium","assessor":"primary"}],"cwes":["CWE-754"],"updated_at":"2026-11-02T14:09:34.891666Z"}],"osv":[{"id":"CVE-2024-24567","title":"raw_call `value=` kwargs not disabled for static and delegate calls","description":"Vyper is a pythonic Smart Contract Language for the ethereum virtual machine. Vyper compiler allows passing a value in builtin raw_call even if the call is a delegatecall or a staticcall. But in the context of delegatecall and staticcall the handling of value is not possible due to the semantics of the respective opcodes, and vyper will silently ignore the value= argument. If the semantics of the EVM are unknown to the developer, he could suspect that by specifying the `value` kwarg, exactly the given amount will be sent along to the target. This vulnerability affects 0.3.10 and earlier versions.","status":"published","published":"2024-01-30T20:17:53.955Z","modified":"2026-10-28T02:30:53.168133501Z","cvss":[{"version":"3.1","score":4.8,"vector":"CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:L","level":"medium"}],"cwes":["CWE-754"],"updated_at":"2026-11-02T15:44:38.897406Z"},{"id":"GHSA-x2c2-q32w-4w6m","title":"Vyper's raw_call `value=` kwargs not disabled for static and delegate calls","description":"### Summary\nVyper compiler allows passing a value in builtin `raw_call` even if the call is a `delegatecall` or a `staticcall`. But in the context of `delegatecall` and `staticcall` the handling of value is not possible due to the semantics of the respective opcodes, and vyper will silently ignore the `value=` argument.\n\nA contract search was performed and no vulnerable contracts were found in production.\n\n### Details\nThe IR for `raw_call` is built in the `RawCall` class:\nhttps://github.com/vyperlang/vyper/blob/9136169468f317a53b4e7448389aa315f90b95ba/vyper/builtins/functions.py#L1100\n\nHowever, the compiler doesn't validate that if either `delegatecall` or `staticall` are provided as kwargs, that `value` wasn't set. For example, the following compiles without errors:\n```python\nraw_call(self, call_data2, max_outsize=255, is_delegate_call=True, value=msg.value/2)\n```\n\n### Impact\nIf the semantics of the EVM are unknown to the developer, he could suspect that by specifying the `value` kwarg, exactly the given amount will be sent along to the target. However in fact, no `value` will be sent.\n\nHere is an example of an potentially problematic implementation of multicall utilizing the `raw_call` built-in:\n```python\nvalue_accumulator: uint256 = empty(uint256)\n    results: DynArray[Result, max_value(uint8)] = []\n    return_data: Bytes[max_value(uint8)] = b\"\"\n    success: bool = empty(bool)\n    for batch in data:\n        msg_value: uint256 = batch.value\n        value_accumulator = unsafe_add(value_accumulator, msg_value)\n        if (batch.allow_failure == False):\n            return_data = raw_call(self, batch.call_data, max_outsize=255, value=msg_value, is_delegate_call=True)\n            success = True\n            results.append(Result({success: success, return_data: return_data}))\n        else:\n            success, return_data = \\\n                raw_call(self, batch.call_data, max_outsize=255, value=msg_value, is_delegate_call=True, revert_on_failure=False)\n            results.append(Result({success: success, return_data: return_data}))\n    assert msg.value == value_accumulator, \"Multicall: value mismatch\"\n    return results\n```\n\n### Patches\nFixed in https://github.com/vyperlang/vyper/pull/3755\n### Workarounds\n_Is there a way for users to fix or remediate the vulnerability without upgrading?_\n\n### References\n_Are there any links users can visit to find out more?_\n","status":"published","published":"2024-01-30T18:42:28Z","modified":"2026-09-10T03:50:09.737044532Z","cvss":[{"version":"3.1","score":4.8,"vector":"CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:L","level":"medium"}],"cwes":["CWE-754"],"updated_at":"2026-11-02T15:46:59.131095Z"},{"id":"PYSEC-2024-151","description":"Vyper is a pythonic Smart Contract Language for the ethereum virtual machine. Vyper compiler allows passing a value in builtin raw_call even if the call is a delegatecall or a staticcall. But in the context of delegatecall and staticcall the handling of value is not possible due to the semantics of the respective opcodes, and vyper will silently ignore the value= argument. If the semantics of the EVM are unknown to the developer, he could suspect that by specifying the `value` kwarg, exactly the given amount will be sent along to the target. This vulnerability affects 0.3.10 and earlier versions.","status":"published","published":"2024-01-30T21:15:00Z","modified":"2024-11-21T14:57:10.515557Z","cvss":[{"version":"3.1","score":5.3,"vector":"CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N","level":"medium"}],"updated_at":"2026-11-02T15:52:53.837392Z"}]}}