{"id":"CVE-2024-41597","aliases":["EUVD-2024-2411","GHSA-r9vw-cjf9-xh4x"],"status":"disputed","title":"ProcessWire Cross Site Request Forgery vulnerability","description":"Cross Site Request Forgery vulnerability in ProcessWire v.3.0.229 allows a remote attacker to insert a comment. NOTE: this is disputed by the Supplier because the product intentionally accepts anonymous, unauthenticated comments and thus there are fewer situations in which CSRF would be a useful attack technique. Also, the submitted comments are, by default, held for moderator review.","severity":{"version":"3.1","score":4.2,"vector":"CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N","level":"medium","assessor":"adp","from":"cve"},"epss":{"day":"2026-11-09","score":0.00212,"percentile":0.11584,"model":"v2026.06.15"},"facts":{"in_kev":false,"known_exploited":false,"public_exploit":false,"fix_available":false},"cwes":["CWE-352"],"published":"2024-07-19T00:00:00Z","modified":"2026-07-09T14:16:25Z","affected":[{"source":"ghsa","ecosystem":"Packagist","package":"processwire/processwire","ranges":[{"type":"ECOSYSTEM","events":[{"introduced":"0"},{"last_affected":"3.0.229"}]}]},{"source":"osv","ecosystem":"Packagist","package":"processwire/processwire","ranges":[{"type":"ECOSYSTEM","events":[{"introduced":"0"},{"last_affected":"3.0.229"}]}],"versions":["3.0.123","3.0.148","3.0.164","3.0.165","3.0.184","3.0.200","3.0.210","3.0.226","3.0.227","3.0.34","3.0.35","3.0.36","3.0.39","3.0.41","3.0.42","3.0.61","3.0.62","3.0.96","3.0.98"]}],"products":[{"vendor":"processwire","product":"processwire"}],"references":[{"url":"https://gist.github.com/DefensiumDevelopers/608be4d10b016dce0566925368a8b08c#file-cve-2024-41597-md","tags":["x_transferred","Exploit","Third Party Advisory","web"]},{"url":"https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-41597","tags":["advisory"]},{"url":"https://github.com/advisories/GHSA-r9vw-cjf9-xh4x"},{"url":"https://github.com/processwire/processwire","tags":["package"]}],"sources":{"cve":[{"id":"CVE-2024-41597","description":"Cross Site Request Forgery vulnerability in ProcessWire v.3.0.229 allows a remote attacker to insert a comment. NOTE: this is disputed by the Supplier because the product intentionally accepts anonymous, unauthenticated comments and thus there are fewer situations in which CSRF would be a useful attack technique. Also, the submitted comments are, by default, held for moderator review.","status":"disputed","published":"2024-07-19T00:00:00Z","modified":"2026-07-09T12:42:26.873Z","cvss":[{"version":"3.1","score":4.2,"vector":"CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N","level":"medium","assessor":"adp"}],"cwes":["CWE-352"],"updated_at":"2026-11-02T14:34:04.00829Z"}],"euvd":[{"id":"EUVD-2024-2411","description":"Cross Site Request Forgery vulnerability in ProcessWire v.3.0.229 allows a remote attacker to insert a comment. NOTE: this is disputed by the Supplier because the product intentionally accepts anonymous, unauthenticated comments and thus there are fewer situations in which CSRF would be a useful attack technique. Also, the submitted comments are, by default, held for moderator review.","status":"published","published":"2024-07-19T00:00:00Z","modified":"2026-07-09T12:42:26Z","cvss":[{"version":"3.1","score":4.2,"vector":"CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N","level":"medium"}],"updated_at":"2026-11-02T18:20:04.895477Z"}],"ghsa":[{"id":"GHSA-r9vw-cjf9-xh4x","title":"ProcessWire Cross Site Request Forgery vulnerability","description":"Cross Site Request Forgery vulnerability in ProcessWire v.3.0.229 allows a remote attacker to execute arbitrary code via a crafted HTML file to the comments functionality.","status":"published","published":"2024-07-19T21:31:11Z","modified":"2024-11-18T16:26:55Z","cvss":[{"version":"4.0","score":2.1,"vector":"CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:A/VC:L/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N","level":"low"},{"version":"3.1","score":4.2,"vector":"CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N","level":"medium"}],"cwes":["CWE-352"],"updated_at":"2026-11-02T14:38:20.012356Z"}],"nvd":[{"id":"CVE-2024-41597","description":"Cross Site Request Forgery vulnerability in ProcessWire v.3.0.229 allows a remote attacker to insert a comment. NOTE: this is disputed by the Supplier because the product intentionally accepts anonymous, unauthenticated comments and thus there are fewer situations in which CSRF would be a useful attack technique. Also, the submitted comments are, by default, held for moderator review.","status":"disputed","published":"2024-07-19T20:15:08.993Z","modified":"2026-07-09T14:16:25.2Z","cvss":[{"version":"3.1","score":4.2,"vector":"CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N","level":"medium","assessor":"secondary"}],"cwes":["CWE-352"],"updated_at":"2026-11-02T14:10:13.413515Z"}],"osv":[{"id":"GHSA-r9vw-cjf9-xh4x","title":"ProcessWire Cross Site Request Forgery vulnerability","description":"Cross Site Request Forgery vulnerability in ProcessWire v.3.0.229 allows a remote attacker to execute arbitrary code via a crafted HTML file to the comments functionality.","status":"published","published":"2024-07-19T21:31:11Z","modified":"2024-11-27T05:54:32.527411Z","cvss":[{"version":"3.1","score":4.2,"vector":"CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N","level":"medium"},{"version":"4.0","score":2.1,"vector":"CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:A/VC:L/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N","level":"low"}],"cwes":["CWE-352"],"updated_at":"2026-11-02T15:46:55.877614Z"}]}}