{"id":"CVE-2024-47534","aliases":["EUVD-2024-2931","GHSA-4f8r-qqr9-fq8j","GO-2024-3166","SUSE-SU-2024:3911-1","UBUNTU-CVE-2024-47534","openSUSE-SU-2024:0350-1","openSUSE-SU-2024:14447-1"],"status":"published","title":"Incorrect delegation lookups can make go-tuf download the wrong artifact","description":"go-tuf is a Go implementation of The Update Framework (TUF). The go-tuf client inconsistently traces the delegations. For example, if targets delegate to \"A\", and to \"B\", and \"B\" delegates to \"C\", then the client should trace the delegations in the order \"A\" then \"B\" then \"C\" but it may incorrectly trace the delegations \"B\"-\u003e\"C\"-\u003e\"A\". This vulnerability is fixed in 2.0.1.","severity":{"version":"4.0","score":8.2,"vector":"CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:H/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N","level":"high","assessor":"cna","from":"cve"},"epss":{"day":"2026-11-10","score":0.00507,"percentile":0.43604,"model":"v2026.06.15"},"facts":{"in_kev":false,"known_exploited":false,"public_exploit":false,"fix_available":true},"cwes":["CWE-362"],"published":"2024-10-01T15:17:47Z","modified":"2026-10-28T02:30:22Z","fixes":[{"ecosystem":"Go","package":"github.com/theupdateframework/go-tuf/v2","fixed_in":["2.0.1"],"sources":["ghsa","osv"]}],"affected":[{"source":"ghsa","ecosystem":"Go","package":"github.com/theupdateframework/go-tuf/v2","ranges":[{"type":"ECOSYSTEM","events":[{"introduced":"0"},{"fixed":"2.0.1"}]}]},{"source":"osv","ecosystem":"Go","package":"github.com/theupdateframework/go-tuf/v2","ranges":[{"type":"SEMVER","events":[{"introduced":"0"},{"fixed":"2.0.1"}]}]},{"source":"osv","ecosystem":"Go","package":"github.com/theupdateframework/go-tuf/v2","ranges":[{"type":"SEMVER","events":[{"introduced":"0"},{"fixed":"2.0.1"}]}]},{"source":"osv","ecosystem":"SUSE:Linux Enterprise Module for Package Hub 15 SP5","package":"govulncheck-vulndb","ranges":[{"type":"ECOSYSTEM","events":[{"introduced":"0"},{"fixed":"0.0.20241030T212825-150000.1.9.1"}]}],"bundled":44},{"source":"osv","ecosystem":"SUSE:Linux Enterprise Module for Package Hub 15 SP6","package":"govulncheck-vulndb","ranges":[{"type":"ECOSYSTEM","events":[{"introduced":"0"},{"fixed":"0.0.20241030T212825-150000.1.9.1"}]}],"bundled":44},{"source":"osv","ecosystem":"openSUSE:Leap 15.5","package":"govulncheck-vulndb","ranges":[{"type":"ECOSYSTEM","events":[{"introduced":"0"},{"fixed":"0.0.20241030T212825-150000.1.9.1"}]}],"bundled":44},{"source":"osv","ecosystem":"openSUSE:Leap 15.6","package":"govulncheck-vulndb","ranges":[{"type":"ECOSYSTEM","events":[{"introduced":"0"},{"fixed":"0.0.20241030T212825-150000.1.9.1"}]}],"bundled":44},{"source":"osv","ecosystem":"Ubuntu:16.04:LTS","package":"golang-github-endophage-gotuf","ranges":[{"type":"ECOSYSTEM","events":[{"introduced":"0"}]}],"versions":["0.0~git20150904.0.9bcdad0-1","0.0~git20151020.0.2df1c8e-1"]},{"source":"osv","ecosystem":"Ubuntu:18.04:LTS","package":"golang-github-endophage-gotuf","ranges":[{"type":"ECOSYSTEM","events":[{"introduced":"0"}]}],"versions":["0.0~git20151020.0.2df1c8e-1"]},{"source":"osv","ecosystem":"SUSE:Package Hub 12","package":"govulncheck-vulndb","ranges":[{"type":"ECOSYSTEM","events":[{"introduced":"0"},{"fixed":"0.0.20241104T154416-5.1"}]}],"bundled":56},{"source":"osv","ecosystem":"openSUSE:Tumbleweed","package":"govulncheck-vulndb","ranges":[{"type":"ECOSYSTEM","events":[{"introduced":"0"},{"fixed":"0.0.20241030T212825-1.1"}]}],"bundled":44}],"products":[{"vendor":"theupdateframework","product":"go-tuf"}],"references":[{"url":"https://github.com/theupdateframework/go-tuf/security/advisories/GHSA-4f8r-qqr9-fq8j","tags":["x_refsource_CONFIRM","advisory","web","report"]},{"url":"https://github.com/theupdateframework/tuf-conformance/pull/115","tags":["x_refsource_MISC","fix","web","report"]},{"url":"https://github.com/theupdateframework/go-tuf/commit/edc30b474f5afd4cc603e17149704d5aa605151d","tags":["x_refsource_MISC","fix","web"]},{"url":"https://github.com/theupdateframework/go-tuf/commit/f36420caba9edbfdfd64f95a9554c0836d9cf819","tags":["x_refsource_MISC","fix","web","report"]},{"url":"https://github.com/theupdateframework/go-tuf/blob/f95222bdd22d2ac4e5b8ed6fe912b645e213c3b5/metadata/metadata.go#L565-L580","tags":["x_refsource_MISC","web","report"]},{"url":"https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-47534","tags":["advisory"]},{"url":"https://pkg.go.dev/vuln/GO-2024-3166","tags":["web"]},{"url":"https://github.com/advisories/GHSA-4f8r-qqr9-fq8j"},{"url":"https://github.com/CVEProject/cvelistV5/tree/main/cves/2024/47xxx/CVE-2024-47534.json","tags":["advisory"]},{"url":"https://github.com/theupdateframework/go-tuf","tags":["package"]},{"url":"https://www.suse.com/support/update/announcement/2024/suse-su-20243911-1/","tags":["advisory"]},{"url":"https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2022-45157","tags":["web"]},{"url":"https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2023-22644","tags":["web"]},{"url":"https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2023-32197","tags":["web"]},{"url":"https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2024-10214","tags":["web"]},{"url":"https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2024-10241","tags":["web"]},{"url":"https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2024-22030","tags":["web"]},{"url":"https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2024-22036","tags":["web"]},{"url":"https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2024-33662","tags":["web"]},{"url":"https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2024-36814","tags":["web"]},{"url":"https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2024-38365","tags":["web"]},{"url":"https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2024-39223","tags":["web"]},{"url":"https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2024-47003","tags":["web"]},{"url":"https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2024-47067","tags":["web"]},{"url":"https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2024-47182","tags":["web"]},{"url":"https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2024-47534","tags":["web"]},{"url":"https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2024-47616","tags":["web"]},{"url":"https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2024-47825","tags":["web"]},{"url":"https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2024-47827","tags":["web"]},{"url":"https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2024-47832","tags":["web"]},{"url":"https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2024-47877","tags":["web"]},{"url":"https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2024-48909","tags":["web"]},{"url":"https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2024-48921","tags":["web"]},{"url":"https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2024-49380","tags":["web"]},{"url":"https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2024-49381","tags":["web"]},{"url":"https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2024-49753","tags":["web"]},{"url":"https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2024-49757","tags":["web"]},{"url":"https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2024-50312","tags":["web"]},{"url":"https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2024-7558","tags":["web"]},{"url":"https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2024-7594","tags":["web"]},{"url":"https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2024-8037","tags":["web"]},{"url":"https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2024-8038","tags":["web"]},{"url":"https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2024-8901","tags":["web"]},{"url":"https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2024-8975","tags":["web"]},{"url":"https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2024-8996","tags":["web"]},{"url":"https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2024-9180","tags":["web"]},{"url":"https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2024-9264","tags":["web"]},{"url":"https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2024-9312","tags":["web"]},{"url":"https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2024-9313","tags":["web"]},{"url":"https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2024-9341","tags":["web"]},{"url":"https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2024-9355","tags":["web"]},{"url":"https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2024-9407","tags":["web"]},{"url":"https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2024-9486","tags":["web"]},{"url":"https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2024-9594","tags":["web"]},{"url":"https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2024-9675","tags":["web"]},{"url":"https://ubuntu.com/security/CVE-2024-47534","tags":["report"]},{"url":"https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-47534","tags":["report"]},{"url":"https://lists.opensuse.org/archives/list/security-announce@lists.opensuse.org/thread/3GBL6IN35EDC2YQIKBPTX7XQQ67KRPAM/","tags":["advisory"]},{"url":"https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2024-0132","tags":["web"]},{"url":"https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2024-0133","tags":["web"]},{"url":"https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2024-10005","tags":["web"]},{"url":"https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2024-10006","tags":["web"]},{"url":"https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2024-10086","tags":["web"]},{"url":"https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2024-10452","tags":["web"]},{"url":"https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2024-39720","tags":["web"]},{"url":"https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2024-46872","tags":["web"]},{"url":"https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2024-47401","tags":["web"]},{"url":"https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2024-50052","tags":["web"]},{"url":"https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2024-50354","tags":["web"]},{"url":"https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2024-8185","tags":["web"]},{"url":"https://lists.opensuse.org/archives/list/security-announce@lists.opensuse.org/thread/XTEQAM75LF5DZCFX3MOH4IT3DWP5ZTL6/","tags":["advisory"]}],"sources":{"cve":[{"id":"CVE-2024-47534","title":"Incorrect delegation lookups can make go-tuf download the wrong artifact","description":"go-tuf is a Go implementation of The Update Framework (TUF). The go-tuf client inconsistently traces the delegations. For example, if targets delegate to \"A\", and to \"B\", and \"B\" delegates to \"C\", then the client should trace the delegations in the order \"A\" then \"B\" then \"C\" but it may incorrectly trace the delegations \"B\"-\u003e\"C\"-\u003e\"A\". This vulnerability is fixed in 2.0.1.","status":"published","published":"2024-10-01T15:17:47.363Z","modified":"2024-11-21T16:56:38.062Z","cvss":[{"version":"4.0","score":8.2,"vector":"CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:H/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N","level":"high","assessor":"cna"}],"cwes":["CWE-362"],"updated_at":"2026-11-02T14:33:57.302325Z"}],"euvd":[{"id":"EUVD-2024-2931","description":"go-tuf is a Go implementation of The Update Framework (TUF). The go-tuf client inconsistently traces the delegations. For example, if targets delegate to \"A\", and to \"B\", and \"B\" delegates to \"C\", then the client should trace the delegations in the order \"A\" then \"B\" then \"C\" but it may incorrectly trace the delegations \"B\"-\u003e\"C\"-\u003e\"A\". This vulnerability is fixed in 2.0.1.","status":"published","published":"2024-10-01T15:17:47Z","modified":"2024-11-21T16:56:38Z","cvss":[{"version":"4.0","score":8.2,"vector":"CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:H/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N","level":"high"}],"updated_at":"2026-11-03T00:04:52.521149Z"}],"ghsa":[{"id":"GHSA-4f8r-qqr9-fq8j","title":"Incorrect delegation lookups can make go-tuf download the wrong artifact","description":"During the ongoing work on the TUF conformance test suite, we have come across a test that reveals what we believe is a bug in go-tuf with security implications. The bug exists in go-tuf delegation tracing and could result in downloading the wrong artifact. \n\nWe have come across this issue in the test in this PR: https://github.com/theupdateframework/tuf-conformance/pull/115.\n\nThe test - `test_graph_traversal` - sets up a repository with a series of delegations, invokes the clients `refresh()` and then checks the order in which the client traced the delegations. The test shows that the go-tuf client inconsistently traces the delegations in a wrong way. For example, [during one CI run](https://github.com/theupdateframework/tuf-conformance/pull/115#issuecomment-2275625542), the `two-level-delegations` test case triggered a wrong order. The delegations in this look as such:\n\n```python\n\"two-level-delegations\": DelegationsTestCase(\n        delegations=[\n            DelegationTester(\"targets\", \"A\"),\n            DelegationTester(\"targets\", \"B\"),\n            DelegationTester(\"B\", \"C\"),\n        ],\n        visited_order=[\"A\", \"B\", \"C\"],\n    ),\n```\n\nHere, `targets` delegate to `\"A\"`, and to `\"B\"`, and `\"B\"` delegates to `\"C\"`. The client should trace the delegations in the order `\"A\"` then `\"B\"` then `\"C\"` but in this particular CI run, go-tuf traced the delegations `\"B\"-\u003e\"C\"-\u003e\"A\"`.\n\nIn a subsequent CI run, this test case did not fail, but [another one did](https://github.com/theupdateframework/tuf-conformance/pull/115#issuecomment-2275640487).\n\n@jku has done a bit of debugging and believes that the returned map of `GetRolesForTarget` returns a map that causes this behavior:\n\nhttps://github.com/theupdateframework/go-tuf/blob/f95222bdd22d2ac4e5b8ed6fe912b645e213c3b5/metadata/metadata.go#L565-L580\n\nWe believe that this map should be an ordered list instead of a map.","status":"published","published":"2024-10-01T18:13:25Z","modified":"2024-10-11T14:23:05Z","cvss":[{"version":"4.0","score":8.7,"vector":"CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:H/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N","level":"high"},{"version":"3.1","score":7.5,"vector":"CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N","level":"high"}],"cwes":["CWE-362"],"updated_at":"2026-11-02T14:38:09.785133Z"}],"nvd":[{"id":"CVE-2024-47534","description":"go-tuf is a Go implementation of The Update Framework (TUF). The go-tuf client inconsistently traces the delegations. For example, if targets delegate to \"A\", and to \"B\", and \"B\" delegates to \"C\", then the client should trace the delegations in the order \"A\" then \"B\" then \"C\" but it may incorrectly trace the delegations \"B\"-\u003e\"C\"-\u003e\"A\". This vulnerability is fixed in 2.0.1.","status":"published","published":"2024-10-01T16:15:09.857Z","modified":"2026-06-17T07:57:15.433Z","cvss":[{"version":"4.0","score":8.2,"vector":"CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:H/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X","level":"high","assessor":"secondary"}],"cwes":["CWE-362"],"updated_at":"2026-11-02T14:10:30.673028Z"}],"osv":[{"id":"CVE-2024-47534","title":"Incorrect delegation lookups can make go-tuf download the wrong artifact","description":"go-tuf is a Go implementation of The Update Framework (TUF). The go-tuf client inconsistently traces the delegations. For example, if targets delegate to \"A\", and to \"B\", and \"B\" delegates to \"C\", then the client should trace the delegations in the order \"A\" then \"B\" then \"C\" but it may incorrectly trace the delegations \"B\"-\u003e\"C\"-\u003e\"A\". This vulnerability is fixed in 2.0.1.","status":"published","published":"2024-10-01T15:17:47.363Z","modified":"2026-10-28T02:30:22.410472055Z","cvss":[{"version":"4.0","score":8.2,"vector":"CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:H/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N","level":"high"}],"cwes":["CWE-362"],"updated_at":"2026-11-02T15:44:43.253252Z"},{"id":"GHSA-4f8r-qqr9-fq8j","title":"Incorrect delegation lookups can make go-tuf download the wrong artifact","description":"During the ongoing work on the TUF conformance test suite, we have come across a test that reveals what we believe is a bug in go-tuf with security implications. The bug exists in go-tuf delegation tracing and could result in downloading the wrong artifact. \n\nWe have come across this issue in the test in this PR: https://github.com/theupdateframework/tuf-conformance/pull/115.\n\nThe test - `test_graph_traversal` - sets up a repository with a series of delegations, invokes the clients `refresh()` and then checks the order in which the client traced the delegations. The test shows that the go-tuf client inconsistently traces the delegations in a wrong way. For example, [during one CI run](https://github.com/theupdateframework/tuf-conformance/pull/115#issuecomment-2275625542), the `two-level-delegations` test case triggered a wrong order. The delegations in this look as such:\n\n```python\n\"two-level-delegations\": DelegationsTestCase(\n        delegations=[\n            DelegationTester(\"targets\", \"A\"),\n            DelegationTester(\"targets\", \"B\"),\n            DelegationTester(\"B\", \"C\"),\n        ],\n        visited_order=[\"A\", \"B\", \"C\"],\n    ),\n```\n\nHere, `targets` delegate to `\"A\"`, and to `\"B\"`, and `\"B\"` delegates to `\"C\"`. The client should trace the delegations in the order `\"A\"` then `\"B\"` then `\"C\"` but in this particular CI run, go-tuf traced the delegations `\"B\"-\u003e\"C\"-\u003e\"A\"`.\n\nIn a subsequent CI run, this test case did not fail, but [another one did](https://github.com/theupdateframework/tuf-conformance/pull/115#issuecomment-2275640487).\n\n@jku has done a bit of debugging and believes that the returned map of `GetRolesForTarget` returns a map that causes this behavior:\n\nhttps://github.com/theupdateframework/go-tuf/blob/f95222bdd22d2ac4e5b8ed6fe912b645e213c3b5/metadata/metadata.go#L565-L580\n\nWe believe that this map should be an ordered list instead of a map.","status":"published","published":"2024-10-01T18:13:25Z","modified":"2026-09-10T03:50:19.201447374Z","cvss":[{"version":"3.1","score":7.5,"vector":"CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N","level":"high"},{"version":"4.0","score":8.7,"vector":"CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:H/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N","level":"high"}],"cwes":["CWE-362"],"updated_at":"2026-11-02T15:46:36.782754Z"},{"id":"UBUNTU-CVE-2024-47534","description":"go-tuf is a Go implementation of The Update Framework (TUF). The go-tuf client inconsistently traces the delegations. For example, if targets delegate to \"A\", and to \"B\", and \"B\" delegates to \"C\", then the client should trace the delegations in the order \"A\" then \"B\" then \"C\" but it may incorrectly trace the delegations \"B\"-\u003e\"C\"-\u003e\"A\". This vulnerability is fixed in 2.0.1.","status":"published","published":"2024-10-01T16:15:00Z","modified":"2025-10-24T05:12:57Z","cvss":[{"version":"4.0","score":8.2,"vector":"CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:H/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N","level":"high"}],"updated_at":"2026-11-02T16:55:02.636559Z"},{"id":"GO-2024-3166","title":"Incorrect delegation lookups can make go-tuf download the wrong artifact in github.com/theupdateframework/go-tuf","description":"Incorrect delegation lookups can make go-tuf download the wrong artifact in github.com/theupdateframework/go-tuf","status":"published","published":"2024-10-09T20:29:23Z","modified":"2026-02-04T03:36:06.873801Z","updated_at":"2026-11-02T15:47:01.453823Z"},{"id":"openSUSE-SU-2024:0350-1","title":"Security update for govulncheck-vulndb","description":"This update for govulncheck-vulndb fixes the following issues:\n\n- Update to version 0.0.20241104T154416 2024-11-04T15:44:16Z.\n  Refs jsc#PED-11136\n  Go CVE Numbering Authority IDs added or updated with aliases:\n  * GO-2024-3233 CVE-2024-46872 GHSA-762g-9p7f-mrww\n  * GO-2024-3234 CVE-2024-47401 GHSA-762v-rq7q-ff97\n  * GO-2024-3235 CVE-2024-50052 GHSA-g376-m3h3-mj4r\n  * GO-2024-3237 CVE-2024-0133 GHSA-f748-7hpg-88ch\n  * GO-2024-3239 CVE-2024-0132 GHSA-mjjw-553x-87pq\n  * GO-2024-3240 CVE-2024-10452 GHSA-66c4-2g2v-54qw\n  * GO-2024-3241 CVE-2024-10006 GHSA-5c4w-8hhh-3c3h\n  * GO-2024-3242 CVE-2024-10086 GHSA-99wr-c2px-grmh\n  * GO-2024-3243 CVE-2024-10005 GHSA-chgm-7r52-whjj\n\n- Update to version 0.0.20241101T215616 2024-11-01T21:56:16Z.\n  Refs jsc#PED-11136\n  Go CVE Numbering Authority IDs added or updated with aliases:\n  * GO-2024-3244 CVE-2024-50354 GHSA-cph5-3pgr-c82g\n  * GO-2024-3245 CVE-2024-39720\n  * GO-2024-3246 CVE-2024-8185 GHSA-g233-2p4r-3q7v\n\n- Update to version 0.0.20241030T212825 2024-10-30T21:28:25Z.\n  Refs jsc#PED-11136\n  Go CVE Numbering Authority IDs added or updated with aliases:\n  * GO-2024-3230 CVE-2024-48921 GHSA-qjvc-p88j-j9rm\n  * GO-2024-3232 CVE-2024-10241 GHSA-6mvp-gh77-7vwh\n\n- Update to version 0.0.20241030T160108 2024-10-30T16:01:08Z.\n  Refs jsc#PED-11136\n  Go CVE Numbering Authority IDs added or updated with aliases:\n  * GO-2024-3226 CVE-2024-47827 GHSA-ghjw-32xw-ffwr\n  * GO-2024-3227 CVE-2024-10214 GHSA-hm57-h27x-599c\n  * GO-2024-3228 GHSA-wcx9-ccpj-hx3c\n- Packaging improvments:\n  * Backfill CVE aliases in recent changelog entries\n\n- Update to version 0.0.20241028T152002 2024-10-28T15:20:02Z.\n  Refs jsc#PED-11136\n  Go CVE Numbering Authority IDs added or updated with aliases:\n  * GO-2024-3207 GHSA-p5wf-cmr4-xrwr\n  * GO-2024-3208 CVE-2024-47825 GHSA-3wwx-63fv-pfq6\n  * GO-2024-3210 CVE-2024-8901\n  * GO-2024-3211 CVE-2024-50312\n  * GO-2024-3212 GHSA-rjfv-pjvx-mjgv\n  * GO-2024-3213 CVE-2024-49380\n  * GO-2024-3214 CVE-2024-49381\n  * GO-2024-3215 CVE-2024-9264 GHSA-q99m-qcv4-fpm7\n  * GO-2024-3216 CVE-2024-49753 GHSA-6cf5-w9h3-4rqv\n  * GO-2024-3217 CVE-2024-49757 GHSA-3rmw-76m6-4gjc\n  * GO-2024-3219 GHSA-7h65-4p22-39j6\n  * GO-2024-3220 CVE-2023-32197 GHSA-7h8m-pvw3-5gh4\n  * GO-2024-3221 CVE-2024-22036 GHSA-h99m-6755-rgwc\n  * GO-2024-3222 GHSA-x7xj-jvwp-97rv\n  * GO-2024-3223 CVE-2022-45157 GHSA-xj7w-r753-vj8v\n  * GO-2024-3224 CVE-2024-39223 GHSA-8wxx-35qc-vp6r\n\n- Update to version 0.0.20241017T153730 date 2024-10-17T15:37:30Z.\n  Refs jsc#PED-11136\n  Go CVE Numbering Authority IDs added or updated with aliases:\n  * GO-2024-3189 CVE-2024-38365 GHSA-27vh-h6mc-q6g8\n  * GO-2024-3203 CVE-2024-9486\n  * GO-2024-3204 CVE-2024-9594\n\n  Go CVE Numbering Authority IDs added or updated with aliases:\n  * GO-2024-3189 CVE-2024-38365 GHSA-27vh-h6mc-q6g8\n  * GO-2024-3196 CVE-2024-47877 GHSA-8rm2-93mq-jqhc\n  * GO-2024-3199 GHSA-vv6c-69r6-chg9\n  * GO-2024-3200 CVE-2024-48909 GHSA-3c32-4hq9-6wgj\n  * GO-2024-3201 CVE-2023-22644\n  Go CVE Numbering Authority IDs added or updated with aliases:\n  * GO-2024-3166 CVE-2024-47534 GHSA-4f8r-qqr9-fq8j\n  * GO-2024-3171 CVE-2024-9341 GHSA-mc76-5925-c5p6\n  Go CVE Numbering Authority IDs added or updated with aliases:\n  * GO-2024-3161 CVE-2024-22030 GHSA-h4h5-9833-v2p4\n  * GO-2024-3162 CVE-2024-7594 GHSA-jg74-mwgw-v6x3\n  * GO-2024-3163 CVE-2024-47182\n  * GO-2024-3164 CVE-2024-47003 GHSA-59hf-mpf8-pqjh\n  * GO-2024-3166 CVE-2024-47534 GHSA-4f8r-qqr9-fq8j\n  * GO-2024-3167 CVE-2024-9355 GHSA-3h3x-2hwv-hr52\n  * GO-2024-3168 CVE-2024-8975 GHSA-chqx-36rm-rf8h\n  * GO-2024-3169 CVE-2024-9407 GHSA-fhqq-8f65-5xfc\n  * GO-2024-3170 CVE-2024-8996 GHSA-m5gv-m5f9-wgv4\n  * GO-2024-3172 CVE-2024-33662 GHSA-9mjw-79r6-c9m8\n  * GO-2024-3173 CVE-2024-7558 GHSA-mh98-763h-m9v4\n  * GO-2024-3174 CVE-2024-8037 GHSA-8v4w-f4r9-7h6x\n  * GO-2024-3175 CVE-2024-8038 GHSA-xwgj-vpm9-q2rq\n  * GO-2024-3179 CVE-2024-47616 GHSA-r7rh-jww5-5fjr\n  * GO-2024-3181 CVE-2024-9313 GHSA-x5q3-c8rm-w787\n  * GO-2024-3182 GHSA-wpr2-j6gr-pjw9\n  * GO-2024-3184 CVE-2024-36814 GHSA-9cp9-8gw2-8v7m\n  * GO-2024-3185 CVE-2024-47832\n  * GO-2024-3186 CVE-2024-9675 GHSA-586p-749j-fhwp\n  * GO-2024-3188 CVE-2024-9312 GHSA-4gfw-wf7c-w6g2\n  * GO-2024-3190 CVE-2024-47067 GHSA-8pph-gfhp-w226\n  * GO-2024-3191 CVE-2024-9180 GHSA-rr8j-7w34-xp5j","status":"published","published":"2024-11-05T14:52:20Z","modified":"2026-02-04T12:23:04.839834Z","updated_at":"2026-11-02T16:58:33.135986Z"},{"id":"openSUSE-SU-2024:14447-1","title":"govulncheck-vulndb-0.0.20241030T212825-1.1 on GA media","description":"These are all security issues fixed in the govulncheck-vulndb-0.0.20241030T212825-1.1 package on the GA media of openSUSE Tumbleweed.","status":"published","published":"2024-11-01T00:00:00Z","modified":"2026-02-04T03:23:32.319637Z","updated_at":"2026-11-02T16:58:36.976155Z"},{"id":"SUSE-SU-2024:3911-1","title":"Security update for govulncheck-vulndb","description":"This update for govulncheck-vulndb fixes the following issues:\n\nUpdate to version 0.0.20241030T212825 2024-10-30T21:28:25Z ( jsc#PED-11136 )\n\n- Go CVE Numbering Authority IDs added or updated with aliases:\n\n  * GO-2024-3230 CVE-2024-48921 GHSA-qjvc-p88j-j9rm\n  * GO-2024-3232 CVE-2024-10241 GHSA-6mvp-gh77-7vwh\n\n- Go CVE Numbering Authority IDs added or updated with aliases:\n\n  * GO-2024-3226 CVE-2024-47827 GHSA-ghjw-32xw-ffwr\n  * GO-2024-3227 CVE-2024-10214 GHSA-hm57-h27x-599c\n  * GO-2024-3228 GHSA-wcx9-ccpj-hx3c\n\n- Go CVE Numbering Authority IDs added or updated with aliases:\n\n  * GO-2024-3207 GHSA-p5wf-cmr4-xrwr\n  * GO-2024-3208 CVE-2024-47825 GHSA-3wwx-63fv-pfq6\n  * GO-2024-3210 CVE-2024-8901\n  * GO-2024-3211 CVE-2024-50312\n  * GO-2024-3212 GHSA-rjfv-pjvx-mjgv\n  * GO-2024-3213 CVE-2024-49380\n  * GO-2024-3214 CVE-2024-49381\n  * GO-2024-3215 CVE-2024-9264 GHSA-q99m-qcv4-fpm7\n  * GO-2024-3216 CVE-2024-49753 GHSA-6cf5-w9h3-4rqv\n  * GO-2024-3217 CVE-2024-49757 GHSA-3rmw-76m6-4gjc\n  * GO-2024-3219 GHSA-7h65-4p22-39j6\n  * GO-2024-3220 CVE-2023-32197 GHSA-7h8m-pvw3-5gh4\n  * GO-2024-3221 CVE-2024-22036 GHSA-h99m-6755-rgwc\n  * GO-2024-3222 GHSA-x7xj-jvwp-97rv\n  * GO-2024-3223 CVE-2022-45157 GHSA-xj7w-r753-vj8v\n  * GO-2024-3224 CVE-2024-39223 GHSA-8wxx-35qc-vp6r\n\n- Go CVE Numbering Authority IDs added or updated with aliases:\n\n  * GO-2024-3189 CVE-2024-38365 GHSA-27vh-h6mc-q6g8\n  * GO-2024-3203 CVE-2024-9486\n  * GO-2024-3204 CVE-2024-9594\n\n- Go CVE Numbering Authority IDs added or updated with aliases:\n\n  * GO-2024-3189 CVE-2024-38365 GHSA-27vh-h6mc-q6g8\n  * GO-2024-3196 CVE-2024-47877 GHSA-8rm2-93mq-jqhc\n  * GO-2024-3199 GHSA-vv6c-69r6-chg9\n  * GO-2024-3200 CVE-2024-48909 GHSA-3c32-4hq9-6wgj\n  * GO-2024-3201 CVE-2023-22644\n- Go CVE Numbering Authority IDs added or updated with aliases:\n\n  * GO-2024-3166 CVE-2024-47534 GHSA-4f8r-qqr9-fq8j\n  * GO-2024-3171 CVE-2024-9341 GHSA-mc76-5925-c5p6\n\n- Go CVE Numbering Authority IDs added or updated with aliases:\n\n  * GO-2024-3161 CVE-2024-22030 GHSA-h4h5-9833-v2p4\n  * GO-2024-3162 CVE-2024-7594 GHSA-jg74-mwgw-v6x3\n  * GO-2024-3163 CVE-2024-47182\n  * GO-2024-3164 CVE-2024-47003 GHSA-59hf-mpf8-pqjh\n  * GO-2024-3166 CVE-2024-47534 GHSA-4f8r-qqr9-fq8j\n  * GO-2024-3167 CVE-2024-9355 GHSA-3h3x-2hwv-hr52\n  * GO-2024-3168 CVE-2024-8975 GHSA-chqx-36rm-rf8h\n  * GO-2024-3169 CVE-2024-9407 GHSA-fhqq-8f65-5xfc\n  * GO-2024-3170 CVE-2024-8996 GHSA-m5gv-m5f9-wgv4\n  * GO-2024-3172 CVE-2024-33662 GHSA-9mjw-79r6-c9m8\n  * GO-2024-3173 CVE-2024-7558 GHSA-mh98-763h-m9v4\n  * GO-2024-3174 CVE-2024-8037 GHSA-8v4w-f4r9-7h6x\n  * GO-2024-3175 CVE-2024-8038 GHSA-xwgj-vpm9-q2rq\n  * GO-2024-3179 CVE-2024-47616 GHSA-r7rh-jww5-5fjr\n  * GO-2024-3181 CVE-2024-9313 GHSA-x5q3-c8rm-w787\n  * GO-2024-3182 GHSA-wpr2-j6gr-pjw9\n  * GO-2024-3184 CVE-2024-36814 GHSA-9cp9-8gw2-8v7m\n  * GO-2024-3185 CVE-2024-47832\n  * GO-2024-3186 CVE-2024-9675 GHSA-586p-749j-fhwp\n  * GO-2024-3188 CVE-2024-9312 GHSA-4gfw-wf7c-w6g2\n  * GO-2024-3190 CVE-2024-47067 GHSA-8pph-gfhp-w226\n  * GO-2024-3191 CVE-2024-9180 GHSA-rr8j-7w34-xp5j","status":"published","published":"2024-11-05T07:45:02Z","modified":"2026-02-05T08:02:05.10845Z","updated_at":"2026-11-02T15:53:55.639015Z"}]}}