{"id":"CVE-2025-24371","aliases":["EUVD-2025-0216","GHSA-22qq-3xwm-r5x4","GO-2025-3442","SUSE-SU-2025:0429-1","openSUSE-SU-2025:14732-1"],"status":"published","title":"Malicious peer can make node stuck in blocksync in github.com/cometbft/cometbft","description":"CometBFT is a distributed, Byzantine fault-tolerant, deterministic state machine replication engine. In the `blocksync` protocol peers send their `base` and `latest` heights when they connect to a new node (`A`), which is syncing to the tip of a network. `base` acts as a lower ground and informs `A` that the peer only has blocks starting from height `base`. `latest` height informs `A` about the latest block in a network. Normally, nodes would only report increasing heights. If `B` fails to provide the latest block, `B` is removed and the `latest` height (target height) is recalculated based on other nodes `latest` heights. The existing code however doesn't check for the case where `B` first reports `latest` height `X` and immediately after height `Y`, where `X \u003e Y`. `A` will be trying to catch up to 2000 indefinitely. This condition requires the introduction of malicious code in the full node first reporting some non-existing `latest` height, then reporting lower `latest` height and nodes which are syncing using `blocksync` protocol. This issue has been patched in versions 1.0.1 and 0.38.17 and all users are advised to upgrade. Operators may attempt to ban malicious peers from the network as a workaround.","severity":{"version":"4.0","score":7.1,"vector":"CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N","level":"high","assessor":"cna","from":"cve"},"epss":{"day":"2026-11-11","score":0.00484,"percentile":0.42145,"model":"v2026.06.15"},"facts":{"in_kev":false,"known_exploited":false,"public_exploit":false,"fix_available":true},"cwes":["CWE-703"],"published":"2025-02-03T15:55:28Z","modified":"2026-10-28T02:30:38Z","fixes":[{"ecosystem":"Go","package":"github.com/cometbft/cometbft","fixed_in":["1.0.1","0.38.17"],"sources":["ghsa","osv"]}],"affected":[{"source":"ghsa","ecosystem":"Go","package":"github.com/cometbft/cometbft","ranges":[{"type":"ECOSYSTEM","events":[{"introduced":"1.0.0-alpha.1"},{"fixed":"1.0.1"}]}]},{"source":"ghsa","ecosystem":"Go","package":"github.com/cometbft/cometbft","ranges":[{"type":"ECOSYSTEM","events":[{"introduced":"0"},{"fixed":"0.38.17"}]}]},{"source":"osv","ecosystem":"Go","package":"github.com/cometbft/cometbft","ranges":[{"type":"SEMVER","events":[{"introduced":"1.0.0-alpha.1"},{"fixed":"1.0.1"}]}]},{"source":"osv","ecosystem":"Go","package":"github.com/cometbft/cometbft","ranges":[{"type":"SEMVER","events":[{"introduced":"0"},{"fixed":"0.38.17"}]}]},{"source":"osv","ecosystem":"Go","package":"github.com/cometbft/cometbft","ranges":[{"type":"SEMVER","events":[{"introduced":"0"},{"fixed":"0.38.17"}]}]},{"source":"osv","ecosystem":"Go","package":"github.com/cometbft/cometbft","ranges":[{"type":"SEMVER","events":[{"introduced":"0"},{"fixed":"1.0.1"}]}]},{"source":"osv","ecosystem":"SUSE:Linux Enterprise Module for Package Hub 15 SP6","package":"govulncheck-vulndb","ranges":[{"type":"ECOSYSTEM","events":[{"introduced":"0"},{"fixed":"0.0.20250207T224745-150000.1.32.1"}]}],"bundled":28},{"source":"osv","ecosystem":"openSUSE:Leap 15.6","package":"govulncheck-vulndb","ranges":[{"type":"ECOSYSTEM","events":[{"introduced":"0"},{"fixed":"0.0.20250207T224745-150000.1.32.1"}]}],"bundled":28},{"source":"osv","ecosystem":"openSUSE:Tumbleweed","package":"govulncheck-vulndb","ranges":[{"type":"ECOSYSTEM","events":[{"introduced":"0"},{"fixed":"0.0.20250204T220613-1.1"}]}],"bundled":9}],"products":[{"vendor":"cometbft","product":"cometbft"}],"references":[{"url":"https://github.com/cometbft/cometbft/security/advisories/GHSA-22qq-3xwm-r5x4","tags":["x_refsource_CONFIRM","advisory","web"]},{"url":"https://github.com/cometbft/cometbft/releases/tag/v0.38.17","tags":["x_refsource_MISC","web"]},{"url":"https://github.com/cometbft/cometbft/releases/tag/v1.0.1","tags":["x_refsource_MISC","web"]},{"url":"https://github.com/cometbft/cometbft/commit/0ee80cd609c7ae9fe856bdd1c6d38553fdae90ce","tags":["web","fix"]},{"url":"https://github.com/cometbft/cometbft/commit/2cebfde06ae5073c0b296a9d2ca6ab4b95397ea5","tags":["web","fix"]},{"url":"https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2025-24371","tags":["advisory"]},{"url":"https://pkg.go.dev/vuln/GO-2025-3442","tags":["web"]},{"url":"https://github.com/advisories/GHSA-22qq-3xwm-r5x4"},{"url":"https://github.com/CVEProject/cvelistV5/tree/main/cves/2025/24xxx/CVE-2025-24371.json","tags":["advisory"]},{"url":"https://github.com/cometbft/cometbft","tags":["package"]},{"url":"https://www.suse.com/support/update/announcement/2025/suse-su-20250429-1/","tags":["advisory"]},{"url":"https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2022-47930","tags":["web"]},{"url":"https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2024-10846","tags":["web"]},{"url":"https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2024-11741","tags":["web"]},{"url":"https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2024-13484","tags":["web"]},{"url":"https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2024-35177","tags":["web"]},{"url":"https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2024-3727","tags":["web"]},{"url":"https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2024-45336","tags":["web"]},{"url":"https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2024-45339","tags":["web"]},{"url":"https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2024-45340","tags":["web"]},{"url":"https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2024-45341","tags":["web"]},{"url":"https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2024-47770","tags":["web"]},{"url":"https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2024-50354","tags":["web"]},{"url":"https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2024-9312","tags":["web"]},{"url":"https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2024-9313","tags":["web"]},{"url":"https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2025-0750","tags":["web"]},{"url":"https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2025-22865","tags":["web"]},{"url":"https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2025-22866","tags":["web"]},{"url":"https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2025-22867","tags":["web"]},{"url":"https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2025-23216","tags":["web"]},{"url":"https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2025-24366","tags":["web"]},{"url":"https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2025-24369","tags":["web"]},{"url":"https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2025-24371","tags":["web"]},{"url":"https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2025-24376","tags":["web"]},{"url":"https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2025-24784","tags":["web"]},{"url":"https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2025-24786","tags":["web"]},{"url":"https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2025-24787","tags":["web"]},{"url":"https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2025-24883","tags":["web"]},{"url":"https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2025-24884","tags":["web"]},{"url":"","tags":["advisory"]}],"sources":{"cve":[{"id":"CVE-2025-24371","title":"Malicious peer can make node stuck in blocksync in github.com/cometbft/cometbft","description":"CometBFT is a distributed, Byzantine fault-tolerant, deterministic state machine replication engine. In the `blocksync` protocol peers send their `base` and `latest` heights when they connect to a new node (`A`), which is syncing to the tip of a network. `base` acts as a lower ground and informs `A` that the peer only has blocks starting from height `base`. `latest` height informs `A` about the latest block in a network. Normally, nodes would only report increasing heights. If `B` fails to provide the latest block, `B` is removed and the `latest` height (target height) is recalculated based on other nodes `latest` heights. The existing code however doesn't check for the case where `B` first reports `latest` height `X` and immediately after height `Y`, where `X \u003e Y`. `A` will be trying to catch up to 2000 indefinitely. This condition requires the introduction of malicious code in the full node first reporting some non-existing `latest` height, then reporting lower `latest` height and nodes which are syncing using `blocksync` protocol. This issue has been patched in versions 1.0.1 and 0.38.17 and all users are advised to upgrade. Operators may attempt to ban malicious peers from the network as a workaround.","status":"published","published":"2025-02-03T21:20:56.024Z","modified":"2025-02-04T19:16:21.174Z","cvss":[{"version":"4.0","score":7.1,"vector":"CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N","level":"high","assessor":"cna"}],"cwes":["CWE-703"],"updated_at":"2026-11-02T14:32:43.770144Z"}],"euvd":[{"id":"EUVD-2025-0216","description":"CometBFT is a distributed, Byzantine fault-tolerant, deterministic state machine replication engine. In the `blocksync` protocol peers send their `base` and `latest` heights when they connect to a new node (`A`), which is syncing to the tip of a network. `base` acts as a lower ground and informs `A` that the peer only has blocks starting from height `base`. `latest` height informs `A` about the latest block in a network. Normally, nodes would only report increasing heights. If `B` fails to provide the latest block, `B` is removed and the `latest` height (target height) is recalculated based on other nodes `latest` heights. The existing code however doesn't check for the case where `B` first reports `latest` height `X` and immediately after height `Y`, where `X \u003e Y`. `A` will be trying to catch up to 2000 indefinitely. This condition requires the introduction of malicious code in the full node first reporting some non-existing `latest` height, then reporting lower `latest` height and nodes which are syncing using `blocksync` protocol. This issue has been patched in versions 1.0.1 and 0.38.17 and all users are advised to upgrade. Operators may attempt to ban malicious peers from the network as a workaround.","status":"published","published":"2025-02-03T21:20:56Z","modified":"2025-02-04T19:16:21Z","cvss":[{"version":"4.0","score":7.1,"vector":"CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N","level":"high"}],"updated_at":"2026-11-03T00:04:05.9572Z"}],"ghsa":[{"id":"GHSA-22qq-3xwm-r5x4","title":"CometBFT allows a malicious peer to make node stuck in blocksync","description":"Name: ASA-2025-001: Malicious peer can disrupt node's ability to sync via blocksync\nComponent: CometBFT\n[OUTDATED] Criticality: Medium (Considerable Impact; Possible Likelihood per [ACMv1.2](https://github.com/interchainio/security/blob/main/resources/CLASSIFICATION_MATRIX.md))\n**Update of Criticality on 2026-03-06**: We've made a mistake and over-rated the criticality of this bug in our initial triage. We have calibrated our vulnerability rating internally and updated the criticality of this bug to be Informational (Negligible Impact, Possible Likelihood)\nAffected versions: \u003c= v0.38.16, v1.0.0\nAffected users: Validators, Full nodes\n\n### Impact\n\nA malicious peer may be able to interfere with a node's ability to sync blocks with peers via the blocksync mechanism. \n\nIn the `blocksync` protocol peers send their `base` and `latest` heights when they connect to a new node (`A`), which is syncing to the tip of a network. `base` acts as a lower ground and informs `A` that the peer only has blocks starting from height `base`. `latest` height informs `A` about the latest block in a network. Normally, nodes would only report increasing heights:\n\n```\nB: {base: 100, latest: 1000}\nB: {base: 100, latest: 1001}\nB: {base: 100, latest: 1002}\n...\n```\n\nIf `B` fails to provide the latest block, `B` is removed and the `latest` height (target height) is recalculated based on other nodes `latest` heights.\n\nThe existing code hovewer doesn't check for the case where `B` first reports `latest` height `X` and immediately after height `Y`, where `X \u003e Y`. For example:\n\n```\nB: {base: 100, latest: 2000}\nB: {base: 100, latest: 1001}\nB: {base: 100, latest: 1002}\n...\n```\n\n`A` will be trying to catch up to 2000 indefinitely. Even if `B` disconnects, the `latest` height (target height) won't be recalculated because `A` \"doesn't know where 2000\" came from per see.\n\n#### Impact Qualification\n\nThis condition requires the introduction of malicious code in the full node first reporting a non-existing `latest` height, then reporting lower `latest` height and nodes which are syncing using `blocksync` protocol.\n\n### Patches\n\nThe new CometBFT releases [v1.0.1](https://github.com/cometbft/cometbft/releases/tag/v1.0.1) and [v0.38.17](https://github.com/cometbft/cometbft/releases/tag/v0.38.17) fix this issue.\n\nUnreleased code in the main is patched as well.\n\n### Workarounds\n\nWhen the operator notices `blocksync` is stuck, they can identify the peer from which that message with \"invalid\" height was received. This may require increasing the logging level of the `blocksync` module. This peer can then be subsequently banned at the p2p layer as a temporary mitigation.\n\n### References\n\nIf you have questions about Interchain security efforts, please reach out to our official communication channel at [security@interchain.io](mailto:security@interchain.io).  For more information about the Interchain Foundation’s engagement with Amulet, and to sign up for security notification emails, please see https://github.com/interchainio/security.  \n\nA Github Security Advisory for this issue is available in the CometBFT [repository](https://github.com/cometbft/cometbft/security/advisories/GHSA-22qq-3xwm-r5x4). For more information about CometBFT, see https://docs.cometbft.com/.\n\nEDIT:\n\nPlease notice that this has been updated to be `informational` severity.  This can be avoided by ensuring that one is not connected to a malicious peer during blocksync.","status":"published","published":"2025-02-03T15:55:28Z","modified":"2026-03-09T20:46:44Z","cvss":[{"version":"4.0","score":6.9,"vector":"CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N","level":"medium"}],"cwes":["CWE-703"],"updated_at":"2026-11-02T14:39:33.538417Z"}],"nvd":[{"id":"CVE-2025-24371","description":"CometBFT is a distributed, Byzantine fault-tolerant, deterministic state machine replication engine. In the `blocksync` protocol peers send their `base` and `latest` heights when they connect to a new node (`A`), which is syncing to the tip of a network. `base` acts as a lower ground and informs `A` that the peer only has blocks starting from height `base`. `latest` height informs `A` about the latest block in a network. Normally, nodes would only report increasing heights. If `B` fails to provide the latest block, `B` is removed and the `latest` height (target height) is recalculated based on other nodes `latest` heights. The existing code however doesn't check for the case where `B` first reports `latest` height `X` and immediately after height `Y`, where `X \u003e Y`. `A` will be trying to catch up to 2000 indefinitely. This condition requires the introduction of malicious code in the full node first reporting some non-existing `latest` height, then reporting lower `latest` height and nodes which are syncing using `blocksync` protocol. This issue has been patched in versions 1.0.1 and 0.38.17 and all users are advised to upgrade. Operators may attempt to ban malicious peers from the network as a workaround.","status":"published","published":"2025-02-03T22:15:28.46Z","modified":"2026-06-17T08:58:55.26Z","cvss":[{"version":"4.0","score":7.1,"vector":"CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X","level":"high","assessor":"secondary"}],"cwes":["CWE-703"],"updated_at":"2026-11-02T14:10:49.841519Z"}],"osv":[{"id":"CVE-2025-24371","title":"Malicious peer can make node stuck in blocksync in github.com/cometbft/cometbft","description":"CometBFT is a distributed, Byzantine fault-tolerant, deterministic state machine replication engine. In the `blocksync` protocol peers send their `base` and `latest` heights when they connect to a new node (`A`), which is syncing to the tip of a network. `base` acts as a lower ground and informs `A` that the peer only has blocks starting from height `base`. `latest` height informs `A` about the latest block in a network. Normally, nodes would only report increasing heights. If `B` fails to provide the latest block, `B` is removed and the `latest` height (target height) is recalculated based on other nodes `latest` heights. The existing code however doesn't check for the case where `B` first reports `latest` height `X` and immediately after height `Y`, where `X \u003e Y`. `A` will be trying to catch up to 2000 indefinitely. This condition requires the introduction of malicious code in the full node first reporting some non-existing `latest` height, then reporting lower `latest` height and nodes which are syncing using `blocksync` protocol. This issue has been patched in versions 1.0.1 and 0.38.17 and all users are advised to upgrade. Operators may attempt to ban malicious peers from the network as a workaround.","status":"published","published":"2025-02-03T21:20:56.024Z","modified":"2026-10-28T02:30:38.499004834Z","cvss":[{"version":"4.0","score":7.1,"vector":"CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N","level":"high"}],"cwes":["CWE-703"],"updated_at":"2026-11-02T15:44:47.009967Z"},{"id":"GHSA-22qq-3xwm-r5x4","title":"CometBFT allows a malicious peer to make node stuck in blocksync","description":"Name: ASA-2025-001: Malicious peer can disrupt node's ability to sync via blocksync\nComponent: CometBFT\n[OUTDATED] Criticality: Medium (Considerable Impact; Possible Likelihood per [ACMv1.2](https://github.com/interchainio/security/blob/main/resources/CLASSIFICATION_MATRIX.md))\n**Update of Criticality on 2026-03-06**: We've made a mistake and over-rated the criticality of this bug in our initial triage. We have calibrated our vulnerability rating internally and updated the criticality of this bug to be Informational (Negligible Impact, Possible Likelihood)\nAffected versions: \u003c= v0.38.16, v1.0.0\nAffected users: Validators, Full nodes\n\n### Impact\n\nA malicious peer may be able to interfere with a node's ability to sync blocks with peers via the blocksync mechanism. \n\nIn the `blocksync` protocol peers send their `base` and `latest` heights when they connect to a new node (`A`), which is syncing to the tip of a network. `base` acts as a lower ground and informs `A` that the peer only has blocks starting from height `base`. `latest` height informs `A` about the latest block in a network. Normally, nodes would only report increasing heights:\n\n```\nB: {base: 100, latest: 1000}\nB: {base: 100, latest: 1001}\nB: {base: 100, latest: 1002}\n...\n```\n\nIf `B` fails to provide the latest block, `B` is removed and the `latest` height (target height) is recalculated based on other nodes `latest` heights.\n\nThe existing code hovewer doesn't check for the case where `B` first reports `latest` height `X` and immediately after height `Y`, where `X \u003e Y`. For example:\n\n```\nB: {base: 100, latest: 2000}\nB: {base: 100, latest: 1001}\nB: {base: 100, latest: 1002}\n...\n```\n\n`A` will be trying to catch up to 2000 indefinitely. Even if `B` disconnects, the `latest` height (target height) won't be recalculated because `A` \"doesn't know where 2000\" came from per see.\n\n#### Impact Qualification\n\nThis condition requires the introduction of malicious code in the full node first reporting a non-existing `latest` height, then reporting lower `latest` height and nodes which are syncing using `blocksync` protocol.\n\n### Patches\n\nThe new CometBFT releases [v1.0.1](https://github.com/cometbft/cometbft/releases/tag/v1.0.1) and [v0.38.17](https://github.com/cometbft/cometbft/releases/tag/v0.38.17) fix this issue.\n\nUnreleased code in the main is patched as well.\n\n### Workarounds\n\nWhen the operator notices `blocksync` is stuck, they can identify the peer from which that message with \"invalid\" height was received. This may require increasing the logging level of the `blocksync` module. This peer can then be subsequently banned at the p2p layer as a temporary mitigation.\n\n### References\n\nIf you have questions about Interchain security efforts, please reach out to our official communication channel at [security@interchain.io](mailto:security@interchain.io).  For more information about the Interchain Foundation’s engagement with Amulet, and to sign up for security notification emails, please see https://github.com/interchainio/security.  \n\nA Github Security Advisory for this issue is available in the CometBFT [repository](https://github.com/cometbft/cometbft/security/advisories/GHSA-22qq-3xwm-r5x4). For more information about CometBFT, see https://docs.cometbft.com/.\n\nEDIT:\n\nPlease notice that this has been updated to be `informational` severity.  This can be avoided by ensuring that one is not connected to a malicious peer during blocksync.","status":"published","published":"2025-02-03T15:55:28Z","modified":"2026-03-09T21:01:24.97777Z","cvss":[{"version":"4.0","score":6.9,"vector":"CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N","level":"medium"}],"cwes":["CWE-703"],"updated_at":"2026-11-02T15:46:33.520522Z"},{"id":"GO-2025-3442","title":"CometBFT allows a malicious peer to make node stuck in blocksync in github.com/cometbft/cometbft","description":"CometBFT allows a malicious peer to make node stuck in blocksync in github.com/cometbft/cometbft","status":"published","published":"2025-02-04T22:06:13Z","modified":"2025-11-18T15:33:53Z","updated_at":"2026-11-02T15:47:01.728182Z"},{"id":"openSUSE-SU-2025:14732-1","title":"govulncheck-vulndb-0.0.20250204T220613-1.1 on GA media","description":"These are all security issues fixed in the govulncheck-vulndb-0.0.20250204T220613-1.1 package on the GA media of openSUSE Tumbleweed.","status":"published","published":"2025-02-05T00:00:00Z","modified":"2026-02-04T03:11:09.515111Z","updated_at":"2026-11-02T16:58:36.976155Z"},{"id":"SUSE-SU-2025:0429-1","title":"Security update for govulncheck-vulndb","description":"This update for govulncheck-vulndb fixes the following issues:\n\n- Update to version 0.0.20250207T224745 2025-02-07T22:47:45Z.\n  Refs jsc#PED-11136\n  Go CVE Numbering Authority IDs added or updated with aliases:\n  * GO-2025-3456 CVE-2025-24786 GHSA-9r4c-jwx3-3j76\n  * GO-2025-3457 CVE-2025-24787 GHSA-c7w4-9wv8-7x7c\n  * GO-2025-3458 CVE-2025-24366 GHSA-vj7w-3m8c-6vpx\n\n- Update to version 0.0.20250206T175003 2025-02-06T17:50:03Z.\n  Refs jsc#PED-11136\n  Go CVE Numbering Authority IDs added or updated with aliases:\n  * GO-2023-1867 CVE-2022-47930 GHSA-c58h-qv6g-fw74\n  * GO-2024-3244 CVE-2024-50354 GHSA-cph5-3pgr-c82g\n\n- Update to version 0.0.20250206T165438 2025-02-06T16:54:38Z.\n  Refs jsc#PED-11136\n  Go CVE Numbering Authority IDs added or updated with aliases:\n  * GO-2025-3428 CVE-2025-22867\n  * GO-2025-3447 CVE-2025-22866\n\n- Update to version 0.0.20250205T232745 2025-02-05T23:27:45Z.\n  Refs jsc#PED-11136\n  Go CVE Numbering Authority IDs added or updated with aliases:\n  * GO-2025-3408\n  * GO-2025-3448 GHSA-23qp-3c2m-xx6w\n  * GO-2025-3449 GHSA-mx2j-7cmv-353c\n  * GO-2025-3450 GHSA-w7wm-2425-7p2h\n  * GO-2025-3454 GHSA-mj4v-hp69-27x5\n  * GO-2025-3455 GHSA-vqv5-385r-2hf8\n\n- Update to version 0.0.20250205T003520 2025-02-05T00:35:20Z.\n  Refs jsc#PED-11136\n  Go CVE Numbering Authority IDs added or updated with aliases:\n  * GO-2025-3451\n\n- Update to version 0.0.20250204T220613 2025-02-04T22:06:13Z.\n  Refs jsc#PED-11136\n  Go CVE Numbering Authority IDs added or updated with aliases:\n  * GO-2025-3431 CVE-2025-24884 GHSA-hcr5-wv4p-h2g2\n  * GO-2025-3433 CVE-2025-23216 GHSA-47g2-qmh2-749v\n  * GO-2025-3434 CVE-2025-24376 GHSA-fc89-jghx-8pvg\n  * GO-2025-3435 CVE-2025-24784 GHSA-756x-m4mj-q96c\n  * GO-2025-3436 CVE-2025-24883 GHSA-q26p-9cq4-7fc2\n  * GO-2025-3437 GHSA-274v-mgcv-cm8j\n  * GO-2025-3438 CVE-2024-11741 GHSA-wxcc-2f3q-4h58\n  * GO-2025-3442 CVE-2025-24371 GHSA-22qq-3xwm-r5x4\n  * GO-2025-3443 GHSA-r3r4-g7hq-pq4f\n  * GO-2025-3444 CVE-2024-35177\n  * GO-2025-3445 CVE-2024-47770\n\n- Use standard RPM macros to unpack the source and populate a\n  working directory. Fixes build with RPM 4.20.\n\n- Update to version 0.0.20250130T185858 2025-01-30T18:58:58Z.\n  Refs jsc#PED-11136\n  Go CVE Numbering Authority IDs added or updated with aliases:\n  * GO-2024-2842 CVE-2024-3727 GHSA-6wvf-f2vw-3425\n  * GO-2024-3181 CVE-2024-9313 GHSA-x5q3-c8rm-w787\n  * GO-2024-3188 CVE-2024-9312 GHSA-4gfw-wf7c-w6g2\n  * GO-2025-3372 CVE-2024-45339 GHSA-6wxm-mpqj-6jpf\n  * GO-2025-3373 CVE-2024-45341\n  * GO-2025-3383 CVE-2024-45340\n  * GO-2025-3408\n  * GO-2025-3412 CVE-2024-10846 GHSA-36gq-35j3-p9r9\n  * GO-2025-3420 CVE-2024-45336\n  * GO-2025-3421 CVE-2025-22865\n  * GO-2025-3424 CVE-2025-24369\n  * GO-2025-3426 CVE-2025-0750 GHSA-hp5j-2585-qx6g\n  * GO-2025-3427 CVE-2024-13484 GHSA-58fx-7v9q-3g56\n","status":"published","published":"2025-02-11T14:12:30Z","modified":"2026-02-05T00:10:56.097493Z","updated_at":"2026-11-02T15:53:58.883365Z"}]}}