{"id":"CVE-2025-24376","aliases":["EUVD-2025-0156","GHSA-fc89-jghx-8pvg","GO-2025-3434","SUSE-SU-2025:0429-1","openSUSE-SU-2025:14732-1"],"status":"published","title":"The kubewarden-controller AdmissionPolicy and AdmissionPolicyGroup policies can be used to alter PolicyReport resources","description":"kubewarden-controller is a Kubernetes controller that allows you to dynamically register Kubewarden admission policies. By design, AdmissionPolicy and AdmissionPolicyGroup can evaluate only namespaced resources. The resources to be evaluated are determined by the rules provided by the user when defining the policy. There might be Kubernetes namespaced resources that should not be validated by AdmissionPolicy and by the AdmissionPolicyGroup policies because of their sensitive nature. For example, PolicyReport are namespaced resources that contain the list of non compliant objects found inside of a namespace. An attacker can use either an AdmissionPolicy or an AdmissionPolicyGroup to prevent the creation and update of PolicyReport objects to hide non-compliant resources. Moreover, the same attacker might use a mutating AdmissionPolicy to alter the contents of the PolicyReport created inside of the namespace. Starting from the 1.21.0 release, the validation rules applied to AdmissionPolicy and AdmissionPolicyGroup have been tightened to prevent them from validating sensitive types of namespaced resources.","severity":{"version":"3.1","score":6.5,"vector":"CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:L","level":"medium","assessor":"cna","from":"cve"},"epss":{"day":"2026-11-10","score":0.00345,"percentile":0.28342,"model":"v2026.06.15"},"facts":{"in_kev":false,"known_exploited":false,"public_exploit":false,"fix_available":true},"cwes":["CWE-155","CWE-285"],"published":"2025-01-30T15:51:46Z","modified":"2026-10-28T02:30:55Z","fixes":[{"ecosystem":"Go","package":"github.com/kubewarden/kubewarden-controller","fixed_in":["1.21.0"],"sources":["ghsa","osv"]}],"affected":[{"source":"ghsa","ecosystem":"Go","package":"github.com/kubewarden/kubewarden-controller","ranges":[{"type":"ECOSYSTEM","events":[{"introduced":"1.7.0"},{"fixed":"1.21.0"}]}]},{"source":"osv","ecosystem":"Go","package":"github.com/kubewarden/kubewarden-controller","ranges":[{"type":"SEMVER","events":[{"introduced":"1.7.0"},{"fixed":"1.21.0"}]}]},{"source":"osv","ecosystem":"Go","package":"github.com/kubewarden/kubewarden-controller","ranges":[{"type":"SEMVER","events":[{"introduced":"1.7.0"},{"fixed":"1.21.0"}]}]},{"source":"osv","ecosystem":"SUSE:Linux Enterprise Module for Package Hub 15 SP6","package":"govulncheck-vulndb","ranges":[{"type":"ECOSYSTEM","events":[{"introduced":"0"},{"fixed":"0.0.20250207T224745-150000.1.32.1"}]}],"bundled":28},{"source":"osv","ecosystem":"openSUSE:Leap 15.6","package":"govulncheck-vulndb","ranges":[{"type":"ECOSYSTEM","events":[{"introduced":"0"},{"fixed":"0.0.20250207T224745-150000.1.32.1"}]}],"bundled":28},{"source":"osv","ecosystem":"openSUSE:Tumbleweed","package":"govulncheck-vulndb","ranges":[{"type":"ECOSYSTEM","events":[{"introduced":"0"},{"fixed":"0.0.20250204T220613-1.1"}]}],"bundled":9}],"products":[{"vendor":"kubewarden","product":"kubewarden-controller"}],"references":[{"url":"https://github.com/kubewarden/kubewarden-controller/security/advisories/GHSA-fc89-jghx-8pvg","tags":["x_refsource_CONFIRM","advisory","web"]},{"url":"https://github.com/kubewarden/kubewarden-controller/commit/8124039b5f0c955d0ee8c8ca12d4415282f02d2c","tags":["x_refsource_MISC","fix","web"]},{"url":"https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2025-24376","tags":["advisory"]},{"url":"https://pkg.go.dev/vuln/GO-2025-3434","tags":["web"]},{"url":"https://github.com/advisories/GHSA-fc89-jghx-8pvg"},{"url":"https://github.com/CVEProject/cvelistV5/tree/main/cves/2025/24xxx/CVE-2025-24376.json","tags":["advisory"]},{"url":"https://github.com/kubewarden/kubewarden-controller","tags":["package"]},{"url":"https://www.suse.com/support/update/announcement/2025/suse-su-20250429-1/","tags":["advisory"]},{"url":"https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2022-47930","tags":["web"]},{"url":"https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2024-10846","tags":["web"]},{"url":"https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2024-11741","tags":["web"]},{"url":"https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2024-13484","tags":["web"]},{"url":"https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2024-35177","tags":["web"]},{"url":"https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2024-3727","tags":["web"]},{"url":"https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2024-45336","tags":["web"]},{"url":"https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2024-45339","tags":["web"]},{"url":"https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2024-45340","tags":["web"]},{"url":"https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2024-45341","tags":["web"]},{"url":"https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2024-47770","tags":["web"]},{"url":"https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2024-50354","tags":["web"]},{"url":"https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2024-9312","tags":["web"]},{"url":"https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2024-9313","tags":["web"]},{"url":"https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2025-0750","tags":["web"]},{"url":"https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2025-22865","tags":["web"]},{"url":"https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2025-22866","tags":["web"]},{"url":"https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2025-22867","tags":["web"]},{"url":"https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2025-23216","tags":["web"]},{"url":"https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2025-24366","tags":["web"]},{"url":"https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2025-24369","tags":["web"]},{"url":"https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2025-24371","tags":["web"]},{"url":"https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2025-24376","tags":["web"]},{"url":"https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2025-24784","tags":["web"]},{"url":"https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2025-24786","tags":["web"]},{"url":"https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2025-24787","tags":["web"]},{"url":"https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2025-24883","tags":["web"]},{"url":"https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2025-24884","tags":["web"]},{"url":"","tags":["advisory"]}],"sources":{"cve":[{"id":"CVE-2025-24376","title":"The kubewarden-controller AdmissionPolicy and AdmissionPolicyGroup policies can be used to alter PolicyReport resources","description":"kubewarden-controller is a Kubernetes controller that allows you to dynamically register Kubewarden admission policies. By design, AdmissionPolicy and AdmissionPolicyGroup can evaluate only namespaced resources. The resources to be evaluated are determined by the rules provided by the user when defining the policy. There might be Kubernetes namespaced resources that should not be validated by AdmissionPolicy and by the AdmissionPolicyGroup policies because of their sensitive nature. For example, PolicyReport are namespaced resources that contain the list of non compliant objects found inside of a namespace. An attacker can use either an AdmissionPolicy or an AdmissionPolicyGroup to prevent the creation and update of PolicyReport objects to hide non-compliant resources. Moreover, the same attacker might use a mutating AdmissionPolicy to alter the contents of the PolicyReport created inside of the namespace. Starting from the 1.21.0 release, the validation rules applied to AdmissionPolicy and AdmissionPolicyGroup have been tightened to prevent them from validating sensitive types of namespaced resources.","status":"published","published":"2025-01-30T15:51:46.184Z","modified":"2025-02-12T19:51:11.773Z","cvss":[{"version":"3.1","score":6.5,"vector":"CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:L","level":"medium","assessor":"cna"}],"cwes":["CWE-285","CWE-155"],"updated_at":"2026-11-02T14:32:44.11109Z"}],"euvd":[{"id":"EUVD-2025-0156","description":"kubewarden-controller is a Kubernetes controller that allows you to dynamically register Kubewarden admission policies. By design, AdmissionPolicy and AdmissionPolicyGroup can evaluate only namespaced resources. The resources to be evaluated are determined by the rules provided by the user when defining the policy. There might be Kubernetes namespaced resources that should not be validated by AdmissionPolicy and by the AdmissionPolicyGroup policies because of their sensitive nature. For example, PolicyReport are namespaced resources that contain the list of non compliant objects found inside of a namespace. An attacker can use either an AdmissionPolicy or an AdmissionPolicyGroup to prevent the creation and update of PolicyReport objects to hide non-compliant resources. Moreover, the same attacker might use a mutating AdmissionPolicy to alter the contents of the PolicyReport created inside of the namespace. Starting from the 1.21.0 release, the validation rules applied to AdmissionPolicy and AdmissionPolicyGroup have been tightened to prevent them from validating sensitive types of namespaced resources.","status":"published","published":"2025-01-30T15:51:46Z","modified":"2025-02-12T19:51:11Z","cvss":[{"version":"3.1","score":6.5,"vector":"CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:L","level":"medium"}],"updated_at":"2026-11-03T00:03:56.967798Z"}],"ghsa":[{"id":"GHSA-fc89-jghx-8pvg","title":"KubeWarden's AdmissionPolicy and AdmissionPolicyGroup policies can be used to alter PolicyReport resources","description":"### Impact\n\nBy design, AdmissionPolicy and AdmissionPolicyGroup can evaluate only namespaced resources. The resources to be evaluated are determined by the rules provided by the user when defining the policy.\nThere might be Kubernetes namespaced resources that should not be validated by AdmissionPolicy and by the AdmissionPolicyGroup policies because of their sensitive nature.\nFor example, PolicyReport are namespaced resources that contain the list of non compliant objects found inside of a namespace. See [this section](https://docs.kubewarden.io/explanations/audit-scanner/policy-reports) of Kubewarden’s documentation for more details about PolicyReport resources.\nAn attacker can use either an AdmissionPolicy or an AdmissionPolicyGroup to prevent the creation and update of PolicyReport objects to hide non-compliant resources.\nMoreover, the same attacker might use a mutating AdmissionPolicy to alter the contents of the PolicyReport created inside of the namespace.\n\n### Patches\n\nStarting from the 1.21.0 release, the validation rules applied to AdmissionPolicy and AdmissionPolicyGroup have been tightened to prevent them from validating sensitive types of namespaced resources.\nThe new validation will also restrict the usage of wildcards when defining apiGroups and resources rules for AdmissionPolicy and AdmissionPolicyGroup objects.\n\n### Workarounds\n\nOn clusters running Kubewarden \u003c 1.21.0, the following Kubewarden policy can be applied to prevent the creation of AdmissionPolicy and AdmissionPolicyGroup resources that interact with PolicyReport resources:\n\n```yaml\napiVersion: policies.kubewarden.io/v1\nkind: ClusterAdmissionPolicy\nmetadata:\n  name: \"deny-interaction-with-policyreport\"\nspec:\n  module: registry://ghcr.io/kubewarden/policies/cel-policy:latest\n  settings:\n    variables:\n      - name: hasWildcardInsideOfApiGroup\n        expression: \"object.spec.rules.exists(r, r.apiGroups.exists(ag, ag == '*'))\"\n      - name: hasWildcardInsideOfResources\n        expression: \"object.spec.rules.exists(r, r.resources.exists(ag, ag == '*' || ag == '*/*' || ag == 'policyreports/*'))\"\n      - name: dealsWithPolicyReportApiGroup\n        expression: \"object.spec.rules.exists(r, r.apiGroups.exists(ag, ag == 'wgpolicyk8s.io'))\"\n      - name: dealsWithPolicyReportResource\n        expression: \"object.spec.rules.exists(r, r.resources.exists(ag, ag == 'policyreports' || ag == 'policyreports/'))\"\n      - name: isPendingDeletion\n        expression: \"has(object.metadata.deletionTimestamp)\"\n    validations:\n      - expression: |\n          !( variables.hasWildcardInsideOfApiGroup ||\n             variables.hasWildcardInsideOfResources ||\n             variables.dealsWithPolicyReportResource ||\n             variables.dealsWithPolicyReportApiGroup\n          ) || variables.isPendingDeletion\n        message: \"cannot target PolicyReport resources or use wildcards in apiGroups or resources\"\n  rules:\n    - apiGroups: [\"policies.kubewarden.io\"]\n      apiVersions: [\"v1\"]\n      operations: [\"CREATE\", \"UPDATE\"]\n      resources: [\"admissionpolicies\", \"admissionpolicygroups\"]\n  mutating: false\n  backgroundAudit: true\n```\n\n### For more information\n\nIf you have any questions or comments about this advisory you can contact the Kubewarden team using the procedures described under the “[security disclosure](https://docs.kubewarden.io/disclosure)“ guidelines of the Kubewarden project.","status":"published","published":"2025-01-30T17:52:37Z","modified":"2025-02-05T16:24:00Z","cvss":[{"version":"3.1","score":6.5,"vector":"CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:L","level":"medium"}],"cwes":["CWE-155"],"updated_at":"2026-11-02T14:38:29.866763Z"}],"nvd":[{"id":"CVE-2025-24376","description":"kubewarden-controller is a Kubernetes controller that allows you to dynamically register Kubewarden admission policies. By design, AdmissionPolicy and AdmissionPolicyGroup can evaluate only namespaced resources. The resources to be evaluated are determined by the rules provided by the user when defining the policy. There might be Kubernetes namespaced resources that should not be validated by AdmissionPolicy and by the AdmissionPolicyGroup policies because of their sensitive nature. For example, PolicyReport are namespaced resources that contain the list of non compliant objects found inside of a namespace. An attacker can use either an AdmissionPolicy or an AdmissionPolicyGroup to prevent the creation and update of PolicyReport objects to hide non-compliant resources. Moreover, the same attacker might use a mutating AdmissionPolicy to alter the contents of the PolicyReport created inside of the namespace. Starting from the 1.21.0 release, the validation rules applied to AdmissionPolicy and AdmissionPolicyGroup have been tightened to prevent them from validating sensitive types of namespaced resources.","status":"published","published":"2025-01-30T16:15:31.63Z","modified":"2026-06-17T08:58:55.797Z","cvss":[{"version":"3.1","score":6.5,"vector":"CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:L","level":"medium","assessor":"secondary"}],"cwes":["CWE-155","CWE-285"],"updated_at":"2026-11-02T14:10:49.841519Z"}],"osv":[{"id":"CVE-2025-24376","title":"The kubewarden-controller AdmissionPolicy and AdmissionPolicyGroup policies can be used to alter PolicyReport resources","description":"kubewarden-controller is a Kubernetes controller that allows you to dynamically register Kubewarden admission policies. By design, AdmissionPolicy and AdmissionPolicyGroup can evaluate only namespaced resources. The resources to be evaluated are determined by the rules provided by the user when defining the policy. There might be Kubernetes namespaced resources that should not be validated by AdmissionPolicy and by the AdmissionPolicyGroup policies because of their sensitive nature. For example, PolicyReport are namespaced resources that contain the list of non compliant objects found inside of a namespace. An attacker can use either an AdmissionPolicy or an AdmissionPolicyGroup to prevent the creation and update of PolicyReport objects to hide non-compliant resources. Moreover, the same attacker might use a mutating AdmissionPolicy to alter the contents of the PolicyReport created inside of the namespace. Starting from the 1.21.0 release, the validation rules applied to AdmissionPolicy and AdmissionPolicyGroup have been tightened to prevent them from validating sensitive types of namespaced resources.","status":"published","published":"2025-01-30T15:51:46.184Z","modified":"2026-10-28T02:30:55.429449344Z","cvss":[{"version":"3.1","score":6.5,"vector":"CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:L","level":"medium"}],"cwes":["CWE-155","CWE-285"],"updated_at":"2026-11-02T15:44:47.009967Z"},{"id":"GHSA-fc89-jghx-8pvg","title":"KubeWarden's AdmissionPolicy and AdmissionPolicyGroup policies can be used to alter PolicyReport resources","description":"### Impact\n\nBy design, AdmissionPolicy and AdmissionPolicyGroup can evaluate only namespaced resources. The resources to be evaluated are determined by the rules provided by the user when defining the policy.\nThere might be Kubernetes namespaced resources that should not be validated by AdmissionPolicy and by the AdmissionPolicyGroup policies because of their sensitive nature.\nFor example, PolicyReport are namespaced resources that contain the list of non compliant objects found inside of a namespace. See [this section](https://docs.kubewarden.io/explanations/audit-scanner/policy-reports) of Kubewarden’s documentation for more details about PolicyReport resources.\nAn attacker can use either an AdmissionPolicy or an AdmissionPolicyGroup to prevent the creation and update of PolicyReport objects to hide non-compliant resources.\nMoreover, the same attacker might use a mutating AdmissionPolicy to alter the contents of the PolicyReport created inside of the namespace.\n\n### Patches\n\nStarting from the 1.21.0 release, the validation rules applied to AdmissionPolicy and AdmissionPolicyGroup have been tightened to prevent them from validating sensitive types of namespaced resources.\nThe new validation will also restrict the usage of wildcards when defining apiGroups and resources rules for AdmissionPolicy and AdmissionPolicyGroup objects.\n\n### Workarounds\n\nOn clusters running Kubewarden \u003c 1.21.0, the following Kubewarden policy can be applied to prevent the creation of AdmissionPolicy and AdmissionPolicyGroup resources that interact with PolicyReport resources:\n\n```yaml\napiVersion: policies.kubewarden.io/v1\nkind: ClusterAdmissionPolicy\nmetadata:\n  name: \"deny-interaction-with-policyreport\"\nspec:\n  module: registry://ghcr.io/kubewarden/policies/cel-policy:latest\n  settings:\n    variables:\n      - name: hasWildcardInsideOfApiGroup\n        expression: \"object.spec.rules.exists(r, r.apiGroups.exists(ag, ag == '*'))\"\n      - name: hasWildcardInsideOfResources\n        expression: \"object.spec.rules.exists(r, r.resources.exists(ag, ag == '*' || ag == '*/*' || ag == 'policyreports/*'))\"\n      - name: dealsWithPolicyReportApiGroup\n        expression: \"object.spec.rules.exists(r, r.apiGroups.exists(ag, ag == 'wgpolicyk8s.io'))\"\n      - name: dealsWithPolicyReportResource\n        expression: \"object.spec.rules.exists(r, r.resources.exists(ag, ag == 'policyreports' || ag == 'policyreports/'))\"\n      - name: isPendingDeletion\n        expression: \"has(object.metadata.deletionTimestamp)\"\n    validations:\n      - expression: |\n          !( variables.hasWildcardInsideOfApiGroup ||\n             variables.hasWildcardInsideOfResources ||\n             variables.dealsWithPolicyReportResource ||\n             variables.dealsWithPolicyReportApiGroup\n          ) || variables.isPendingDeletion\n        message: \"cannot target PolicyReport resources or use wildcards in apiGroups or resources\"\n  rules:\n    - apiGroups: [\"policies.kubewarden.io\"]\n      apiVersions: [\"v1\"]\n      operations: [\"CREATE\", \"UPDATE\"]\n      resources: [\"admissionpolicies\", \"admissionpolicygroups\"]\n  mutating: false\n  backgroundAudit: true\n```\n\n### For more information\n\nIf you have any questions or comments about this advisory you can contact the Kubewarden team using the procedures described under the “[security disclosure](https://docs.kubewarden.io/disclosure)“ guidelines of the Kubewarden project.","status":"published","published":"2025-01-30T17:52:37Z","modified":"2025-02-05T16:23:59Z","cvss":[{"version":"3.1","score":6.5,"vector":"CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:L","level":"medium"}],"cwes":["CWE-155"],"updated_at":"2026-11-02T15:46:46.39441Z"},{"id":"GO-2025-3434","title":"KubeWarden's AdmissionPolicy and AdmissionPolicyGroup policies can be used to alter PolicyReport resources in github.com/kubewarden/kubewarden-controller","description":"KubeWarden's AdmissionPolicy and AdmissionPolicyGroup policies can be used to alter PolicyReport resources in github.com/kubewarden/kubewarden-controller","status":"published","published":"2025-02-04T22:06:11Z","modified":"2026-03-03T04:56:13.872087Z","updated_at":"2026-11-02T15:47:01.728182Z"},{"id":"openSUSE-SU-2025:14732-1","title":"govulncheck-vulndb-0.0.20250204T220613-1.1 on GA media","description":"These are all security issues fixed in the govulncheck-vulndb-0.0.20250204T220613-1.1 package on the GA media of openSUSE Tumbleweed.","status":"published","published":"2025-02-05T00:00:00Z","modified":"2026-02-04T03:11:09.515111Z","updated_at":"2026-11-02T16:58:36.976155Z"},{"id":"SUSE-SU-2025:0429-1","title":"Security update for govulncheck-vulndb","description":"This update for govulncheck-vulndb fixes the following issues:\n\n- Update to version 0.0.20250207T224745 2025-02-07T22:47:45Z.\n  Refs jsc#PED-11136\n  Go CVE Numbering Authority IDs added or updated with aliases:\n  * GO-2025-3456 CVE-2025-24786 GHSA-9r4c-jwx3-3j76\n  * GO-2025-3457 CVE-2025-24787 GHSA-c7w4-9wv8-7x7c\n  * GO-2025-3458 CVE-2025-24366 GHSA-vj7w-3m8c-6vpx\n\n- Update to version 0.0.20250206T175003 2025-02-06T17:50:03Z.\n  Refs jsc#PED-11136\n  Go CVE Numbering Authority IDs added or updated with aliases:\n  * GO-2023-1867 CVE-2022-47930 GHSA-c58h-qv6g-fw74\n  * GO-2024-3244 CVE-2024-50354 GHSA-cph5-3pgr-c82g\n\n- Update to version 0.0.20250206T165438 2025-02-06T16:54:38Z.\n  Refs jsc#PED-11136\n  Go CVE Numbering Authority IDs added or updated with aliases:\n  * GO-2025-3428 CVE-2025-22867\n  * GO-2025-3447 CVE-2025-22866\n\n- Update to version 0.0.20250205T232745 2025-02-05T23:27:45Z.\n  Refs jsc#PED-11136\n  Go CVE Numbering Authority IDs added or updated with aliases:\n  * GO-2025-3408\n  * GO-2025-3448 GHSA-23qp-3c2m-xx6w\n  * GO-2025-3449 GHSA-mx2j-7cmv-353c\n  * GO-2025-3450 GHSA-w7wm-2425-7p2h\n  * GO-2025-3454 GHSA-mj4v-hp69-27x5\n  * GO-2025-3455 GHSA-vqv5-385r-2hf8\n\n- Update to version 0.0.20250205T003520 2025-02-05T00:35:20Z.\n  Refs jsc#PED-11136\n  Go CVE Numbering Authority IDs added or updated with aliases:\n  * GO-2025-3451\n\n- Update to version 0.0.20250204T220613 2025-02-04T22:06:13Z.\n  Refs jsc#PED-11136\n  Go CVE Numbering Authority IDs added or updated with aliases:\n  * GO-2025-3431 CVE-2025-24884 GHSA-hcr5-wv4p-h2g2\n  * GO-2025-3433 CVE-2025-23216 GHSA-47g2-qmh2-749v\n  * GO-2025-3434 CVE-2025-24376 GHSA-fc89-jghx-8pvg\n  * GO-2025-3435 CVE-2025-24784 GHSA-756x-m4mj-q96c\n  * GO-2025-3436 CVE-2025-24883 GHSA-q26p-9cq4-7fc2\n  * GO-2025-3437 GHSA-274v-mgcv-cm8j\n  * GO-2025-3438 CVE-2024-11741 GHSA-wxcc-2f3q-4h58\n  * GO-2025-3442 CVE-2025-24371 GHSA-22qq-3xwm-r5x4\n  * GO-2025-3443 GHSA-r3r4-g7hq-pq4f\n  * GO-2025-3444 CVE-2024-35177\n  * GO-2025-3445 CVE-2024-47770\n\n- Use standard RPM macros to unpack the source and populate a\n  working directory. Fixes build with RPM 4.20.\n\n- Update to version 0.0.20250130T185858 2025-01-30T18:58:58Z.\n  Refs jsc#PED-11136\n  Go CVE Numbering Authority IDs added or updated with aliases:\n  * GO-2024-2842 CVE-2024-3727 GHSA-6wvf-f2vw-3425\n  * GO-2024-3181 CVE-2024-9313 GHSA-x5q3-c8rm-w787\n  * GO-2024-3188 CVE-2024-9312 GHSA-4gfw-wf7c-w6g2\n  * GO-2025-3372 CVE-2024-45339 GHSA-6wxm-mpqj-6jpf\n  * GO-2025-3373 CVE-2024-45341\n  * GO-2025-3383 CVE-2024-45340\n  * GO-2025-3408\n  * GO-2025-3412 CVE-2024-10846 GHSA-36gq-35j3-p9r9\n  * GO-2025-3420 CVE-2024-45336\n  * GO-2025-3421 CVE-2025-22865\n  * GO-2025-3424 CVE-2025-24369\n  * GO-2025-3426 CVE-2025-0750 GHSA-hp5j-2585-qx6g\n  * GO-2025-3427 CVE-2024-13484 GHSA-58fx-7v9q-3g56\n","status":"published","published":"2025-02-11T14:12:30Z","modified":"2026-02-05T00:10:56.097493Z","updated_at":"2026-11-02T15:53:58.883365Z"}]}}