{"id":"CVE-2025-32874","aliases":["EUVD-2025-21707","GHSA-fm6w-39g9-r4vh"],"status":"published","title":"An issue was discovered in Kaseya Rapid Fire Tools Network Detective through 2.0.16.0. A...","description":"An issue was discovered in Kaseya Rapid Fire Tools Network Detective through 2.0.16.0. A vulnerability exists in the EncryptionUtil class because symmetric encryption is implemented in a deterministic and non-randomized fashion. The method Encrypt(byte[] clearData) derives both the encryption key and the IV from a fixed, hardcoded input by using a static salt value. As a result, identical plaintext inputs always produce identical ciphertext outputs. This is true for both FIPS and non-FIPS generated passwords. In other words, there is a cryptographic implementation flaw in the password encryption mechanism. Although there are multiple encryption methods grouped under FIPS and non-FIPS classifications, the logic consistently results in predictable and reversible encrypted outputs due to the lack of per-operation randomness and encryption authentication.","severity":{"version":"3.1","score":7.5,"vector":"CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:L/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H","level":"high","assessor":"adp","from":"cve"},"epss":{"day":"2026-11-10","score":0.00085,"percentile":0.0026,"model":"v2026.06.15"},"facts":{"in_kev":false,"known_exploited":false,"public_exploit":false,"fix_available":false},"cwes":["CWE-311","CWE-326"],"published":"2025-07-16T00:00:00Z","modified":"2026-06-17T09:12:43Z","references":[{"url":"https://galacticadvisors.com"},{"url":"https://codykretsinger.com"},{"url":"https://www.galacticadvisors.com/release/critical-vulnerabilities-in-network-detective/"},{"url":"https://www.galacticadvisors.com/release/cve/"},{"url":"https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2025-32874"},{"url":"https://www.galacticadvisors.com/release/critical-vulnerabilities-in-network-detective"},{"url":"https://www.galacticadvisors.com/release/cve"},{"url":"https://github.com/advisories/GHSA-fm6w-39g9-r4vh"}],"sources":{"cve":[{"id":"CVE-2025-32874","description":"An issue was discovered in Kaseya Rapid Fire Tools Network Detective through 2.0.16.0. A vulnerability exists in the EncryptionUtil class because symmetric encryption is implemented in a deterministic and non-randomized fashion. The method Encrypt(byte[] clearData) derives both the encryption key and the IV from a fixed, hardcoded input by using a static salt value. As a result, identical plaintext inputs always produce identical ciphertext outputs. This is true for both FIPS and non-FIPS generated passwords. In other words, there is a cryptographic implementation flaw in the password encryption mechanism. Although there are multiple encryption methods grouped under FIPS and non-FIPS classifications, the logic consistently results in predictable and reversible encrypted outputs due to the lack of per-operation randomness and encryption authentication.","status":"published","published":"2025-07-16T00:00:00Z","modified":"2025-11-24T15:25:43.122Z","cvss":[{"version":"3.1","score":7.5,"vector":"CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:L/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H","level":"high","assessor":"adp"}],"cwes":["CWE-326"],"updated_at":"2026-11-02T14:32:46.109993Z"}],"euvd":[{"id":"EUVD-2025-21707","description":"An issue was discovered in Kaseya Rapid Fire Tools Network Detective through 2.0.16.0. A vulnerability exists in the EncryptionUtil class because symmetric encryption is implemented in a deterministic and non-randomized fashion. The method Encrypt(byte[] clearData) derives both the encryption key and the IV from a fixed, hardcoded input by using a static salt value. As a result, identical plaintext inputs always produce identical ciphertext outputs. This is true for both FIPS and non-FIPS generated passwords. In other words, there is a cryptographic implementation flaw in the password encryption mechanism. Although there are multiple encryption methods grouped under FIPS and non-FIPS classifications, the logic consistently results in predictable and reversible encrypted outputs due to the lack of per-operation randomness and encryption authentication.","status":"published","published":"2025-07-16T00:00:00Z","modified":"2025-11-24T15:25:43Z","cvss":[{"version":"3.1","score":7.5,"vector":"CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:L/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H","level":"high"}],"updated_at":"2026-11-02T19:49:13.187271Z"}],"ghsa":[{"id":"GHSA-fm6w-39g9-r4vh","title":"An issue was discovered in Kaseya Rapid Fire Tools Network Detective through 2.0.16.0. A...","description":"An issue was discovered in Kaseya Rapid Fire Tools Network Detective through 2.0.16.0. A vulnerability exists in the EncryptionUtil class because symmetric encryption is implemented in a deterministic and non-randomized fashion. The method Encrypt(byte[] clearData) derives both the encryption key and the IV from a fixed, hardcoded input by using a static salt value. As a result, identical plaintext inputs always produce identical ciphertext outputs. This is true for both FIPS and non-FIPS generated passwords. In other words, there is a cryptographic implementation flaw in the password encryption mechanism. Although there are multiple encryption methods grouped under FIPS and non-FIPS classifications, the logic consistently results in predictable and reversible encrypted outputs due to the lack of per-operation randomness and encryption authentication.","status":"published","published":"2025-07-16T15:32:33Z","modified":"2025-11-24T18:32:09Z","cvss":[{"version":"3.1","score":7.4,"vector":"CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N","level":"high"}],"cwes":["CWE-311","CWE-326"],"updated_at":"2026-11-02T15:04:55.899096Z"}],"nvd":[{"id":"CVE-2025-32874","description":"An issue was discovered in Kaseya Rapid Fire Tools Network Detective through 2.0.16.0. A vulnerability exists in the EncryptionUtil class because symmetric encryption is implemented in a deterministic and non-randomized fashion. The method Encrypt(byte[] clearData) derives both the encryption key and the IV from a fixed, hardcoded input by using a static salt value. As a result, identical plaintext inputs always produce identical ciphertext outputs. This is true for both FIPS and non-FIPS generated passwords. In other words, there is a cryptographic implementation flaw in the password encryption mechanism. Although there are multiple encryption methods grouped under FIPS and non-FIPS classifications, the logic consistently results in predictable and reversible encrypted outputs due to the lack of per-operation randomness and encryption authentication.","status":"published","published":"2025-07-16T15:15:26.29Z","modified":"2026-06-17T09:12:43.89Z","cvss":[{"version":"3.1","score":7.5,"vector":"CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:L/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H","level":"high","assessor":"secondary"}],"cwes":["CWE-326"],"updated_at":"2026-11-02T14:11:18.782156Z"}]}}