{"id":"CVE-2025-59437","aliases":["DEBIAN-CVE-2025-59437","EUVD-2025-29356","GHSA-vvh3-7x7m-53xf","UBUNTU-CVE-2025-59437"],"status":"published","title":"The ip (aka node-ip) package through 2.0.1 (in NPM) might allow SSRF because the IP address value...","description":"The ip (aka node-ip) package through 2.0.1 (in NPM) might allow SSRF because the IP address value 0 is improperly categorized as globally routable via isPublic. NOTE: this issue exists because of an incomplete fix for CVE-2024-29415. NOTE: in current versions of several applications, connection attempts to the IP address 0 (interpreted as 0.0.0.0) are blocked with error messages such as net::ERR_ADDRESS_INVALID. However, in some situations that depend on both application version and operating system, connection attempts to 0 and 0.0.0.0 are considered connection attempts to 127.0.0.1 (and, for this reason, a false value of isPublic would be preferable).","severity":{"version":"3.1","score":3.2,"vector":"CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:N/I:L/A:N","level":"low","assessor":"cna","from":"cve"},"epss":{"day":"2026-11-10","score":0.00124,"percentile":0.02133,"model":"v2026.06.15"},"facts":{"in_kev":false,"known_exploited":false,"public_exploit":false,"fix_available":false},"cwes":["CWE-918"],"published":"2025-09-16T00:00:00Z","modified":"2026-10-28T02:30:54Z","affected":[{"source":"osv","ecosystem":"Debian:13","package":"node-ip","ranges":[{"type":"ECOSYSTEM","events":[{"introduced":"0"}]}],"versions":["2.0.1+~1.1.3-3"]},{"source":"osv","ecosystem":"Debian:14","package":"node-ip","ranges":[{"type":"ECOSYSTEM","events":[{"introduced":"0"}]}],"versions":["2.0.1+~1.1.3-3"]},{"source":"osv","ecosystem":"Ubuntu:Pro:18.04:LTS","package":"node-ip","ranges":[{"type":"ECOSYSTEM","events":[{"introduced":"0"}]}],"versions":["1.1.5-1","1.1.5-1ubuntu0.1~esm1"]},{"source":"osv","ecosystem":"Ubuntu:Pro:20.04:LTS","package":"node-ip","ranges":[{"type":"ECOSYSTEM","events":[{"introduced":"0"}]}],"versions":["1.1.5-3","1.1.5-5","1.1.5-5ubuntu0.1~esm1"]},{"source":"osv","ecosystem":"Ubuntu:Pro:22.04:LTS","package":"node-ip","ranges":[{"type":"ECOSYSTEM","events":[{"introduced":"0"}]}],"versions":["1.1.5-5","1.1.5+~1.1.0-1","1.1.5+~1.1.0-1ubuntu0.1~esm1"]},{"source":"osv","ecosystem":"Ubuntu:24.04:LTS","package":"node-ip","ranges":[{"type":"ECOSYSTEM","events":[{"introduced":"0"}]}],"versions":["2.0.0+~1.1.0-1","2.0.0+~1.1.0-1ubuntu1"]},{"source":"osv","ecosystem":"Ubuntu:25.10","package":"node-ip","ranges":[{"type":"ECOSYSTEM","events":[{"introduced":"0"}]}],"versions":["2.0.1+~1.1.3-1","2.0.1+~1.1.3-3"]},{"source":"osv","ecosystem":"Ubuntu:26.10","package":"node-ip","ranges":[{"type":"ECOSYSTEM","events":[{"introduced":"0"}]}],"versions":["2.0.1+~1.1.3-3"]},{"source":"osv","ecosystem":"Ubuntu:26.04:LTS","package":"node-ip","ranges":[{"type":"ECOSYSTEM","events":[{"introduced":"0"}]}],"versions":["2.0.1+~1.1.3-3"]}],"products":[{"vendor":"fedorindutny","product":"ip"},{"vendor":"th30d4y","product":"ip"}],"references":[{"url":"https://cosmosofcyberspace.github.io/CVE-Application-Document.html","tags":["web"]},{"url":"https://github.com/indutny/node-ip/tags","tags":["web"]},{"url":"https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2025-59437","tags":["advisory"]},{"url":"https://github.com/advisories/GHSA-vvh3-7x7m-53xf"},{"url":"https://github.com/CVEProject/cvelistV5/tree/main/cves/2025/59xxx/CVE-2025-59437.json","tags":["advisory"]},{"url":"https://security-tracker.debian.org/tracker/CVE-2025-59437","tags":["advisory"]},{"url":"https://ubuntu.com/security/CVE-2025-59437","tags":["report"]},{"url":"https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-59437","tags":["report"]}],"sources":{"cve":[{"id":"CVE-2025-59437","description":"The ip (aka node-ip) package through 2.0.1 (in NPM) might allow SSRF because the IP address value 0 is improperly categorized as globally routable via isPublic. NOTE: this issue exists because of an incomplete fix for CVE-2024-29415. NOTE: in current versions of several applications, connection attempts to the IP address 0 (interpreted as 0.0.0.0) are blocked with error messages such as net::ERR_ADDRESS_INVALID. However, in some situations that depend on both application version and operating system, connection attempts to 0 and 0.0.0.0 are considered connection attempts to 127.0.0.1 (and, for this reason, a false value of isPublic would be preferable).","status":"published","published":"2025-09-16T00:00:00Z","modified":"2025-09-16T19:14:07.798Z","cvss":[{"version":"3.1","score":3.2,"vector":"CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:N/I:L/A:N","level":"low","assessor":"cna"}],"cwes":["CWE-918"],"updated_at":"2026-11-02T14:32:48.167635Z"}],"euvd":[{"id":"EUVD-2025-29356","description":"The ip (aka node-ip) package through 2.0.1 (in NPM) might allow SSRF because the IP address value 0 is improperly categorized as globally routable via isPublic. NOTE: this issue exists because of an incomplete fix for CVE-2024-29415. NOTE: in current versions of several applications, connection attempts to the IP address 0 (interpreted as 0.0.0.0) are blocked with error messages such as net::ERR_ADDRESS_INVALID. However, in some situations that depend on both application version and operating system, connection attempts to 0 and 0.0.0.0 are considered connection attempts to 127.0.0.1 (and, for this reason, a false value of isPublic would be preferable).","status":"published","published":"2025-09-16T00:00:00Z","modified":"2025-09-16T19:14:07Z","cvss":[{"version":"3.1","score":3.2,"vector":"CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:N/I:L/A:N","level":"low"}],"updated_at":"2026-11-02T20:31:42.601992Z"}],"ghsa":[{"id":"GHSA-vvh3-7x7m-53xf","title":"The ip (aka node-ip) package through 2.0.1 (in NPM) might allow SSRF because the IP address value...","description":"The ip (aka node-ip) package through 2.0.1 (in NPM) might allow SSRF because the IP address value 0 is improperly categorized as globally routable via isPublic. NOTE: this issue exists because of an incomplete fix for CVE-2024-29415. NOTE: in current versions of several applications, connection attempts to the IP address 0 (interpreted as 0.0.0.0) are blocked with error messages such as net::ERR_ADDRESS_INVALID. However, in some situations that depend on both application version and operating system, connection attempts to 0 and 0.0.0.0 are considered connection attempts to 127.0.0.1 (and, for this reason, a false value of isPublic would be preferable).","status":"published","published":"2025-09-16T15:32:31Z","modified":"2025-09-16T15:32:32Z","cvss":[{"version":"3.1","score":3.2,"vector":"CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:N/I:L/A:N","level":"low"}],"cwes":["CWE-918"],"updated_at":"2026-11-02T15:03:37.643927Z"}],"nvd":[{"id":"CVE-2025-59437","description":"The ip (aka node-ip) package through 2.0.1 (in NPM) might allow SSRF because the IP address value 0 is improperly categorized as globally routable via isPublic. NOTE: this issue exists because of an incomplete fix for CVE-2024-29415. NOTE: in current versions of several applications, connection attempts to the IP address 0 (interpreted as 0.0.0.0) are blocked with error messages such as net::ERR_ADDRESS_INVALID. However, in some situations that depend on both application version and operating system, connection attempts to 0 and 0.0.0.0 are considered connection attempts to 127.0.0.1 (and, for this reason, a false value of isPublic would be preferable).","status":"published","published":"2025-09-16T06:16:05.997Z","modified":"2026-06-17T09:46:09.917Z","cvss":[{"version":"3.1","score":3.2,"vector":"CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:N/I:L/A:N","level":"low","assessor":"secondary"}],"cwes":["CWE-918"],"updated_at":"2026-11-02T14:11:29.650057Z"}],"osv":[{"id":"CVE-2025-59437","description":"The ip (aka node-ip) package through 2.0.1 (in NPM) might allow SSRF because the IP address value 0 is improperly categorized as globally routable via isPublic. NOTE: this issue exists because of an incomplete fix for CVE-2024-29415. NOTE: in current versions of several applications, connection attempts to the IP address 0 (interpreted as 0.0.0.0) are blocked with error messages such as net::ERR_ADDRESS_INVALID. However, in some situations that depend on both application version and operating system, connection attempts to 0 and 0.0.0.0 are considered connection attempts to 127.0.0.1 (and, for this reason, a false value of isPublic would be preferable).","status":"published","published":"2025-09-16T00:00:00Z","modified":"2026-10-28T02:30:54.147545326Z","cvss":[{"version":"3.1","score":3.2,"vector":"CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:N/I:L/A:N","level":"low"}],"cwes":["CWE-918"],"updated_at":"2026-11-02T15:44:51.190588Z"},{"id":"DEBIAN-CVE-2025-59437","description":"The ip (aka node-ip) package through 2.0.1 (in NPM) might allow SSRF because the IP address value 0 is improperly categorized as globally routable via isPublic. NOTE: this issue exists because of an incomplete fix for CVE-2024-29415. NOTE: in current versions of several applications, connection attempts to the IP address 0 (interpreted as 0.0.0.0) are blocked with error messages such as net::ERR_ADDRESS_INVALID. However, in some situations that depend on both application version and operating system, connection attempts to 0 and 0.0.0.0 are considered connection attempts to 127.0.0.1 (and, for this reason, a false value of isPublic would be preferable).","status":"published","published":"2025-09-16T06:16:05.997Z","modified":"2026-09-01T20:05:54.686901634Z","cvss":[{"version":"3.1","score":3.2,"vector":"CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:N/I:L/A:N","level":"low"}],"updated_at":"2026-11-02T15:45:47.697959Z"},{"id":"UBUNTU-CVE-2025-59437","description":"The ip (aka node-ip) package through 2.0.1 (in NPM) might allow SSRF because the IP address value 0 is improperly categorized as globally routable via isPublic. NOTE: this issue exists because of an incomplete fix for CVE-2024-29415. NOTE: in current versions of several applications, connection attempts to the IP address 0 (interpreted as 0.0.0.0) are blocked with error messages such as net::ERR_ADDRESS_INVALID. However, in some situations that depend on both application version and operating system, connection attempts to 0 and 0.0.0.0 are considered connection attempts to 127.0.0.1 (and, for this reason, a false value of isPublic would be preferable).","status":"published","published":"2025-09-16T06:16:00Z","modified":"2026-10-17T12:57:09.73088132Z","cvss":[{"version":"3.1","score":3.2,"vector":"CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:N/I:L/A:N","level":"low"}],"updated_at":"2026-11-02T16:55:50.817402Z"}]}}