{"id":"CVE-2025-9604","aliases":["EUVD-2025-26161","GHSA-966j-x6rp-f492"],"status":"published","title":"coze-studio aes.go hard-coded key","description":"A vulnerability was identified in coze-studio up to 0.2.4. The impacted element is an unknown function of the file backend/domain/plugin/encrypt/aes.go. The manipulation of the argument AuthSecretKey/StateSecretKey/OAuthTokenSecretKey leads to use of hard-coded cryptographic key\r . It is possible to initiate the attack remotely. The attack is considered to have high complexity. The exploitability is regarded as difficult. To fix this issue, it is recommended to deploy a patch. The vendor replied to the GitHub issue (translated from simplified Chinese): \"For scenarios requiring encryption, we will implement user-defined key management through configuration and optimize the use of encryption tools, such as random salt.\"","severity":{"version":"4.0","score":6.3,"vector":"CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:H/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X","level":"medium","assessor":"cna","from":"cve"},"epss":{"day":"2026-11-08","score":0.00252,"percentile":0.16767,"model":"v2026.06.15"},"facts":{"in_kev":false,"known_exploited":false,"public_exploit":false,"fix_available":false},"cwes":["CWE-320","CWE-321"],"published":"2025-08-29T01:32:09Z","modified":"2026-10-28T02:30:50Z","products":[{"vendor":"bytedance","product":"coze-studio"}],"references":[{"url":"https://vuldb.com/?id.321780","tags":["vdb-entry","technical-description","advisory"]},{"url":"https://vuldb.com/?ctiid.321780","tags":["signature","permissions-required","report"]},{"url":"https://vuldb.com/?submit.636417","tags":["third-party-advisory","advisory"]},{"url":"https://github.com/coze-dev/coze-studio/issues/505","tags":["issue-tracking","report"]},{"url":"https://github.com/coze-dev/coze-studio/issues/505#issuecomment-3148568862","tags":["issue-tracking","report"]},{"url":"https://github.com/coze-dev/coze-studio/pull/533","tags":["issue-tracking","patch","fix"]},{"url":"https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2025-9604","tags":["advisory"]},{"url":"https://github.com/advisories/GHSA-966j-x6rp-f492"},{"url":"https://github.com/CVEProject/cvelistV5/tree/main/cves/2025/9xxx/CVE-2025-9604.json","tags":["advisory"]}],"sources":{"cve":[{"id":"CVE-2025-9604","title":"coze-studio aes.go hard-coded key","description":"A vulnerability was identified in coze-studio up to 0.2.4. The impacted element is an unknown function of the file backend/domain/plugin/encrypt/aes.go. The manipulation of the argument AuthSecretKey/StateSecretKey/OAuthTokenSecretKey leads to use of hard-coded cryptographic key\r . It is possible to initiate the attack remotely. The attack is considered to have high complexity. The exploitability is regarded as difficult. To fix this issue, it is recommended to deploy a patch. The vendor replied to the GitHub issue (translated from simplified Chinese): \"For scenarios requiring encryption, we will implement user-defined key management through configuration and optimize the use of encryption tools, such as random salt.\"","status":"published","published":"2025-08-29T01:32:09.045Z","modified":"2025-08-29T13:36:16.125Z","cvss":[{"version":"4.0","score":6.3,"vector":"CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:H/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X","level":"medium","assessor":"cna"},{"version":"3.1","score":3.7,"vector":"CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N/E:X/RL:O/RC:C","level":"low","assessor":"cna"},{"version":"3.0","score":3.7,"vector":"CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N/E:X/RL:O/RC:C","level":"low","assessor":"cna"},{"version":"2.0","score":2.6,"vector":"AV:N/AC:H/Au:N/C:P/I:N/A:N/E:ND/RL:OF/RC:C","assessor":"cna"}],"cwes":["CWE-321","CWE-320"],"updated_at":"2026-11-02T14:32:33.755525Z"}],"euvd":[{"id":"EUVD-2025-26161","description":"A vulnerability was identified in coze-studio up to 0.2.4. The impacted element is an unknown function of the file backend/domain/plugin/encrypt/aes.go. The manipulation of the argument AuthSecretKey/StateSecretKey/OAuthTokenSecretKey leads to use of hard-coded cryptographic key\r . It is possible to initiate the attack remotely. The attack is considered to have high complexity. The exploitability is regarded as difficult. To fix this issue, it is recommended to deploy a patch. The vendor replied to the GitHub issue (translated from simplified Chinese): \"For scenarios requiring encryption, we will implement user-defined key management through configuration and optimize the use of encryption tools, such as random salt.\"","status":"published","published":"2025-08-29T01:32:09Z","modified":"2025-08-29T13:36:16Z","cvss":[{"version":"4.0","score":6.3,"vector":"CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:H/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X","level":"medium"}],"updated_at":"2026-11-02T20:31:49.600955Z"}],"ghsa":[{"id":"GHSA-966j-x6rp-f492","title":"A vulnerability was identified in coze-studio up to 0.2.4. The impacted element is an unknown...","description":"A vulnerability was identified in coze-studio up to 0.2.4. The impacted element is an unknown function of the file backend/domain/plugin/encrypt/aes.go. The manipulation of the argument AuthSecretKey/StateSecretKey/OAuthTokenSecretKey leads to use of hard-coded cryptographic key\n . It is possible to initiate the attack remotely. The attack is considered to have high complexity. The exploitability is regarded as difficult. To fix this issue, it is recommended to deploy a patch. The vendor replied to the GitHub issue (translated from simplified Chinese): \"For scenarios requiring encryption, we will implement user-defined key management through configuration and optimize the use of encryption tools, such as random salt.\"","status":"published","published":"2025-08-29T03:30:51Z","modified":"2025-08-29T03:30:57Z","cvss":[{"version":"3.1","score":3.7,"vector":"CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N","level":"low"},{"version":"4.0","score":6.3,"vector":"CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:H/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X","level":"medium"}],"updated_at":"2026-11-02T15:03:27.292795Z"}],"nvd":[{"id":"CVE-2025-9604","description":"A vulnerability was identified in coze-studio up to 0.2.4. The impacted element is an unknown function of the file backend/domain/plugin/encrypt/aes.go. The manipulation of the argument AuthSecretKey/StateSecretKey/OAuthTokenSecretKey leads to use of hard-coded cryptographic key\r . It is possible to initiate the attack remotely. The attack is considered to have high complexity. The exploitability is regarded as difficult. To fix this issue, it is recommended to deploy a patch. The vendor replied to the GitHub issue (translated from simplified Chinese): \"For scenarios requiring encryption, we will implement user-defined key management through configuration and optimize the use of encryption tools, such as random salt.\"","status":"published","published":"2025-08-29T02:15:32.73Z","modified":"2026-10-19T17:10:00.173Z","cvss":[{"version":"4.0","score":6.3,"vector":"CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:H/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X","level":"medium","assessor":"secondary"},{"version":"3.1","score":3.7,"vector":"CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N","level":"low","assessor":"secondary"},{"version":"2.0","score":2.6,"vector":"AV:N/AC:H/Au:N/C:P/I:N/A:N","level":"low","assessor":"secondary"}],"cwes":["CWE-320","CWE-321"],"updated_at":"2026-11-02T14:11:26.200344Z"}],"osv":[{"id":"CVE-2025-9604","title":"coze-studio aes.go hard-coded key","description":"A vulnerability was identified in coze-studio up to 0.2.4. The impacted element is an unknown function of the file backend/domain/plugin/encrypt/aes.go. The manipulation of the argument AuthSecretKey/StateSecretKey/OAuthTokenSecretKey leads to use of hard-coded cryptographic key\r . It is possible to initiate the attack remotely. The attack is considered to have high complexity. The exploitability is regarded as difficult. To fix this issue, it is recommended to deploy a patch. The vendor replied to the GitHub issue (translated from simplified Chinese): \"For scenarios requiring encryption, we will implement user-defined key management through configuration and optimize the use of encryption tools, such as random salt.\"","status":"published","published":"2025-08-29T01:32:09.045Z","modified":"2026-10-28T02:30:50.602112128Z","cvss":[{"version":"4.0","score":6.3,"vector":"CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:H/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X","level":"medium"}],"cwes":["CWE-320","CWE-321"],"updated_at":"2026-11-02T15:44:53.490346Z"}]}}