{"id":"CVE-2026-105570","aliases":["EUVD-2026-95156","GHSA-q97m-w2f6-gjc6"],"status":"published","title":"Docker Sandboxes OAuth response masking could be bypassed with a case-variant token host","description":"Docker Sandboxes compared OAuth token-endpoint hostnames case-sensitively when deciding whether to mask managed credential responses, while request routing treated DNS hostnames case-insensitively. Untrusted code inside a sandbox could use a case-variant hostname to reach the genuine provider endpoint while bypassing response masking. If a user completed the OAuth flow, the provider's access and refresh tokens could be returned unmasked to the sandbox, exposing host-managed credentials.","severity":{"version":"4.0","score":6.7,"vector":"CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:A/VC:H/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N","level":"medium","assessor":"cna","from":"cve"},"epss":{"day":"2026-11-12","score":0.00127,"percentile":0.02401,"model":"v2026.06.15"},"facts":{"in_kev":false,"known_exploited":false,"public_exploit":false,"fix_available":false},"cwes":["CWE-178"],"published":"2026-10-08T18:46:05Z","modified":"2026-10-08T21:33:24Z","products":[{"vendor":"docker","product":"docker sandboxes"}],"references":[{"url":"https://docs.docker.com/ai/sandboxes/","tags":["product"]},{"url":"https://docs.docker.com/ai/sandboxes/configuration/credentials/#how-credential-injection-works","tags":["technical-description"]},{"url":"https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-105570"},{"url":"https://docs.docker.com/ai/sandboxes"},{"url":"https://github.com/advisories/GHSA-q97m-w2f6-gjc6"}],"sources":{"cve":[{"id":"CVE-2026-105570","title":"Docker Sandboxes OAuth response masking could be bypassed with a case-variant token host","description":"Docker Sandboxes compared OAuth token-endpoint hostnames case-sensitively when deciding whether to mask managed credential responses, while request routing treated DNS hostnames case-insensitively. Untrusted code inside a sandbox could use a case-variant hostname to reach the genuine provider endpoint while bypassing response masking. If a user completed the OAuth flow, the provider's access and refresh tokens could be returned unmasked to the sandbox, exposing host-managed credentials.","status":"published","published":"2026-10-08T18:46:05.122Z","modified":"2026-10-08T19:28:28.605Z","cvss":[{"version":"4.0","score":6.7,"vector":"CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:A/VC:H/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N","level":"medium","assessor":"cna"}],"cwes":["CWE-178"],"updated_at":"2026-11-02T14:19:56.755658Z"}],"euvd":[{"id":"EUVD-2026-95156","description":"Docker Sandboxes compared OAuth token-endpoint hostnames case-sensitively when deciding whether to mask managed credential responses, while request routing treated DNS hostnames case-insensitively. Untrusted code inside a sandbox could use a case-variant hostname to reach the genuine provider endpoint while bypassing response masking. If a user completed the OAuth flow, the provider's access and refresh tokens could be returned unmasked to the sandbox, exposing host-managed credentials.","status":"published","published":"2026-10-08T18:46:05Z","modified":"2026-10-08T19:28:28Z","cvss":[{"version":"4.0","score":6.7,"vector":"CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:A/VC:H/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N","level":"medium"}],"updated_at":"2026-11-02T17:27:27.72962Z"}],"ghsa":[{"id":"GHSA-q97m-w2f6-gjc6","title":"Docker Sandboxes compared OAuth token-endpoint hostnames case-sensitively when deciding whether...","description":"Docker Sandboxes compared OAuth token-endpoint hostnames case-sensitively when deciding whether to mask managed credential responses, while request routing treated DNS hostnames case-insensitively. Untrusted code inside a sandbox could use a case-variant hostname to reach the genuine provider endpoint while bypassing response masking. If a user completed the OAuth flow, the provider's access and refresh tokens could be returned unmasked to the sandbox, exposing host-managed credentials.","status":"published","published":"2026-10-08T21:33:24Z","modified":"2026-10-08T21:33:24Z","cvss":[{"version":"4.0","score":6.7,"vector":"CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:A/VC:H/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X","level":"medium"}],"cwes":["CWE-178"],"updated_at":"2026-11-02T15:12:57.86261Z"}],"nvd":[{"id":"CVE-2026-105570","description":"Docker Sandboxes compared OAuth token-endpoint hostnames case-sensitively when deciding whether to mask managed credential responses, while request routing treated DNS hostnames case-insensitively. Untrusted code inside a sandbox could use a case-variant hostname to reach the genuine provider endpoint while bypassing response masking. If a user completed the OAuth flow, the provider's access and refresh tokens could be returned unmasked to the sandbox, exposing host-managed credentials.","status":"published","published":"2026-10-08T19:16:57.133Z","modified":"2026-10-08T20:46:35.26Z","cvss":[{"version":"4.0","score":6.7,"vector":"CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:A/VC:H/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X","level":"medium","assessor":"secondary"}],"cwes":["CWE-178"],"updated_at":"2026-11-02T14:12:55.142936Z"}]}}
