{"id":"CVE-2026-22779","aliases":["EUVD-2026-2451","GHSA-6pw3-h7xf-x4gp","PYSEC-2026-1222"],"status":"published","title":"BlackSheep ClientSession is vulnerable to CRLF injection","description":"BlackSheep is an asynchronous web framework to build event based web applications with Python. Prior to 2.4.6, the HTTP Client implementation in BlackSheep is vulnerable to CRLF injection. Missing headers validation makes it possible for an attacker to modify the HTTP requests (e.g. insert a new header) or even create a new HTTP request. Exploitation requires developers to pass unsanitized user input directly into headers.The server part is not affected because BlackSheep delegates to an underlying ASGI server handling of response headers. This vulnerability is fixed in 2.4.6.","severity":{"version":"4.0","score":6.3,"vector":"CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:L/SI:L/SA:N","level":"medium","assessor":"cna","from":"cve"},"epss":{"day":"2026-11-10","score":0.00368,"percentile":0.30886,"model":"v2026.06.15"},"facts":{"in_kev":false,"known_exploited":false,"public_exploit":false,"fix_available":true},"cwes":["CWE-113","CWE-93"],"published":"2026-01-14T16:49:34Z","modified":"2026-10-28T02:31:11Z","fixes":[{"ecosystem":"PyPI","package":"blacksheep","fixed_in":["2.4.6"],"sources":["ghsa","osv"]}],"affected":[{"source":"ghsa","ecosystem":"PyPI","package":"blacksheep","ranges":[{"type":"ECOSYSTEM","events":[{"introduced":"0"},{"fixed":"2.4.6"}]}]},{"source":"osv","ecosystem":"PyPI","package":"blacksheep","ranges":[{"type":"ECOSYSTEM","events":[{"introduced":"0"},{"fixed":"2.4.6"}]}],"versions":["0.0.1","0.0.2","0.0.4","0.0.5","0.0.6","0.0.7","0.0.9","0.1.0","0.1.1","0.1.2","0.1.3","0.1.4","0.1.5","0.1.6","0.1.7","0.1.8","0.1.9","0.2.0","0.2.1","0.2.2","0.2.3","0.2.4","0.2.5","0.2.6","0.2.7","0.2.8","0.2.9","0.3.0","0.3.1","0.3.2","1.0.0","1.0.1","1.0.2","1.0.3","1.0.4","1.0.5","1.0.6","1.0.7","1.0.8","1.0.9","1.1.0","1.2.0","1.2.1","1.2.10","1.2.11","1.2.12","1.2.13","1.2.14","1.2.15","1.2.16","1.2.17","1.2.18","1.2.19","1.2.2","1.2.20","1.2.3","1.2.4","1.2.5","1.2.6","1.2.7","1.2.8","1.2.9","2.0.0","2.0.1","2.0.2","2.0.3","2.0.4","2.0.5","2.0.6","2.0.7","2.0.8","2.0a0","2.0a1","2.0a10","2.0a11","2.0a12","2.0a2","2.0a3","2.0a4","2.0a5","2.0a6","2.0a7","2.0a8","2.0a9","2.1.0","2.2.0","2.3.0","2.3.1","2.3.1a1","2.3.2","2.4.0","2.4.1","2.4.2","2.4.3","2.4.4","2.4.4a0","2.4.4a2","2.4.5"]},{"source":"osv","ecosystem":"PyPI","package":"blacksheep","ranges":[{"type":"ECOSYSTEM","events":[{"introduced":"0"},{"fixed":"2.4.6"}]}],"versions":["0.0.1","0.0.2","0.0.4","0.0.5","0.0.6","0.0.7","0.0.9","0.1.0","0.1.1","0.1.2","0.1.3","0.1.4","0.1.5","0.1.6","0.1.7","0.1.8","0.1.9","0.2.0","0.2.1","0.2.2","0.2.3","0.2.4","0.2.5","0.2.6","0.2.7","0.2.8","0.2.9","0.3.0","0.3.1","0.3.2","1.0.0","1.0.1","1.0.2","1.0.3","1.0.4","1.0.5","1.0.6","1.0.7","1.0.8","1.0.9","1.1.0","1.2.0","1.2.1","1.2.10","1.2.11","1.2.12","1.2.13","1.2.14","1.2.15","1.2.16","1.2.17","1.2.18","1.2.19","1.2.2","1.2.20","1.2.3","1.2.4","1.2.5","1.2.6","1.2.7","1.2.8","1.2.9","2.0.0","2.0.1","2.0.2","2.0.3","2.0.4","2.0.5","2.0.6","2.0.7","2.0.8","2.0a0","2.0a1","2.0a10","2.0a11","2.0a12","2.0a2","2.0a3","2.0a4","2.0a5","2.0a6","2.0a7","2.0a8","2.0a9","2.1.0","2.2.0","2.3.0","2.3.1","2.3.1a1","2.3.2","2.4.0","2.4.1","2.4.2","2.4.3","2.4.4","2.4.4a0","2.4.4a2","2.4.5"]}],"products":[{"vendor":"neoteroi","product":"blacksheep"}],"references":[{"url":"https://github.com/Neoteroi/BlackSheep/security/advisories/GHSA-6pw3-h7xf-x4gp","tags":["x_refsource_CONFIRM","Third Party Advisory","advisory","web"]},{"url":"https://github.com/Neoteroi/BlackSheep/commit/bd4ecb9542b5d52442276b5a6907931b90f38d12","tags":["x_refsource_MISC","Patch","fix","web"]},{"url":"https://github.com/Neoteroi/BlackSheep/releases/tag/v2.4.6","tags":["x_refsource_MISC","Release Notes","web"]},{"url":"https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-22779","tags":["advisory"]},{"url":"https://github.com/advisories/GHSA-6pw3-h7xf-x4gp","tags":["advisory"]},{"url":"https://github.com/CVEProject/cvelistV5/tree/main/cves/2026/22xxx/CVE-2026-22779.json","tags":["advisory"]},{"url":"https://github.com/Neoteroi/BlackSheep","tags":["package"]},{"url":"https://pypi.org/project/blacksheep","tags":["package"]}],"sources":{"cve":[{"id":"CVE-2026-22779","title":"BlackSheep ClientSession is vulnerable to CRLF injection","description":"BlackSheep is an asynchronous web framework to build event based web applications with Python. Prior to 2.4.6, the HTTP Client implementation in BlackSheep is vulnerable to CRLF injection. Missing headers validation makes it possible for an attacker to modify the HTTP requests (e.g. insert a new header) or even create a new HTTP request. Exploitation requires developers to pass unsanitized user input directly into headers.The server part is not affected because BlackSheep delegates to an underlying ASGI server handling of response headers. This vulnerability is fixed in 2.4.6.","status":"published","published":"2026-01-14T16:49:34.202Z","modified":"2026-01-14T21:01:52.743Z","cvss":[{"version":"4.0","score":6.3,"vector":"CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:L/SI:L/SA:N","level":"medium","assessor":"cna"}],"cwes":["CWE-113"],"updated_at":"2026-11-02T13:39:16.730222Z"}],"euvd":[{"id":"EUVD-2026-2451","description":"BlackSheep is an asynchronous web framework to build event based web applications with Python. Prior to 2.4.6, the HTTP Client implementation in BlackSheep is vulnerable to CRLF injection. Missing headers validation makes it possible for an attacker to modify the HTTP requests (e.g. insert a new header) or even create a new HTTP request. Exploitation requires developers to pass unsanitized user input directly into headers.The server part is not affected because BlackSheep delegates to an underlying ASGI server handling of response headers. This vulnerability is fixed in 2.4.6.","status":"published","published":"2026-01-14T16:49:34Z","modified":"2026-01-14T21:01:52Z","cvss":[{"version":"4.0","score":6.3,"vector":"CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:L/SI:L/SA:N","level":"medium"}],"updated_at":"2026-11-02T19:48:51.744142Z"}],"ghsa":[{"id":"GHSA-6pw3-h7xf-x4gp","title":"BlackSheep's ClientSession is vulnerable to CRLF injection","description":"### Impact\nThe HTTP Client implementation in BlackSheep is vulnerable to CRLF injection. Missing headers validation makes it possible for an attacker to modify the HTTP requests (e.g. insert a new header) or even create a new HTTP request.\nExploitation requires developers to pass unsanitized user input directly into headers.\nThe server part is not affected because BlackSheep delegates to an underlying ASGI server handling of response headers.\n\n**Attack vector:** Applications using user input in HTTP client requests (method, URL, headers).\n\n### Patches\nUsers who use the HTTP Client in BlackSheep should upgrade to `2.4.6`.\n\n### Workarounds\nIf users handle headers from untrusted parties, they might reject values for header names and values that contain carriage returns.\n\n### References\nhttps://owasp.org/www-community/vulnerabilities/CRLF_Injection","status":"published","published":"2026-01-14T16:52:53Z","modified":"2026-01-14T19:50:41Z","cvss":[{"version":"4.0","score":6.3,"vector":"CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:L/SI:L/SA:N","level":"medium"}],"cwes":["CWE-93","CWE-113"],"updated_at":"2026-11-02T14:39:17.333958Z"}],"nvd":[{"id":"CVE-2026-22779","description":"BlackSheep is an asynchronous web framework to build event based web applications with Python. Prior to 2.4.6, the HTTP Client implementation in BlackSheep is vulnerable to CRLF injection. Missing headers validation makes it possible for an attacker to modify the HTTP requests (e.g. insert a new header) or even create a new HTTP request. Exploitation requires developers to pass unsanitized user input directly into headers.The server part is not affected because BlackSheep delegates to an underlying ASGI server handling of response headers. This vulnerability is fixed in 2.4.6.","status":"published","published":"2026-01-14T17:16:09.15Z","modified":"2026-06-17T10:20:24.68Z","cvss":[{"version":"4.0","score":6.3,"vector":"CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:L/SI:L/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X","level":"medium","assessor":"secondary"},{"version":"3.1","score":5.3,"vector":"CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N","level":"medium","assessor":"primary"}],"cwes":["CWE-113"],"updated_at":"2026-11-02T14:12:04.066712Z"}],"osv":[{"id":"CVE-2026-22779","title":"BlackSheep ClientSession is vulnerable to CRLF injection","description":"BlackSheep is an asynchronous web framework to build event based web applications with Python. Prior to 2.4.6, the HTTP Client implementation in BlackSheep is vulnerable to CRLF injection. Missing headers validation makes it possible for an attacker to modify the HTTP requests (e.g. insert a new header) or even create a new HTTP request. Exploitation requires developers to pass unsanitized user input directly into headers.The server part is not affected because BlackSheep delegates to an underlying ASGI server handling of response headers. This vulnerability is fixed in 2.4.6.","status":"published","published":"2026-01-14T16:49:34.202Z","modified":"2026-10-28T02:31:11.113897392Z","cvss":[{"version":"4.0","score":6.3,"vector":"CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:L/SI:L/SA:N","level":"medium"}],"cwes":["CWE-113"],"updated_at":"2026-11-02T15:44:58.42038Z"},{"id":"GHSA-6pw3-h7xf-x4gp","title":"BlackSheep's ClientSession is vulnerable to CRLF injection","description":"### Impact\nThe HTTP Client implementation in BlackSheep is vulnerable to CRLF injection. Missing headers validation makes it possible for an attacker to modify the HTTP requests (e.g. insert a new header) or even create a new HTTP request.\nExploitation requires developers to pass unsanitized user input directly into headers.\nThe server part is not affected because BlackSheep delegates to an underlying ASGI server handling of response headers.\n\n**Attack vector:** Applications using user input in HTTP client requests (method, URL, headers).\n\n### Patches\nUsers who use the HTTP Client in BlackSheep should upgrade to `2.4.6`.\n\n### Workarounds\nIf users handle headers from untrusted parties, they might reject values for header names and values that contain carriage returns.\n\n### References\nhttps://owasp.org/www-community/vulnerabilities/CRLF_Injection","status":"published","published":"2026-01-14T16:52:53Z","modified":"2026-07-07T17:57:21.550642283Z","cvss":[{"version":"4.0","score":6.3,"vector":"CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:L/SI:L/SA:N","level":"medium"}],"cwes":["CWE-113","CWE-93"],"updated_at":"2026-11-02T15:46:39.965326Z"},{"id":"PYSEC-2026-1222","title":"BlackSheep's ClientSession is vulnerable to CRLF injection","description":"### Impact\nThe HTTP Client implementation in BlackSheep is vulnerable to CRLF injection. Missing headers validation makes it possible for an attacker to modify the HTTP requests (e.g. insert a new header) or even create a new HTTP request.\nExploitation requires developers to pass unsanitized user input directly into headers.\nThe server part is not affected because BlackSheep delegates to an underlying ASGI server handling of response headers.\n\n**Attack vector:** Applications using user input in HTTP client requests (method, URL, headers).\n\n### Patches\nUsers who use the HTTP Client in BlackSheep should upgrade to `2.4.6`.\n\n### Workarounds\nIf users handle headers from untrusted parties, they might reject values for header names and values that contain carriage returns.\n\n### References\nhttps://owasp.org/www-community/vulnerabilities/CRLF_Injection","status":"published","published":"2026-07-07T16:03:18.908634Z","modified":"2026-07-07T17:47:32.644648259Z","cvss":[{"version":"4.0","score":6.3,"vector":"CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:L/SI:L/SA:N","level":"medium"}],"updated_at":"2026-11-02T15:52:54.622769Z"}]}}