{"id":"CVE-2026-42769","aliases":["ALPINE-CVE-2026-42769","ALSA-2026:25237","ALSA-2026:25239","AZL-92840","BELL-CVE-2026-42769","CLSA-2026-1782386492","DEBIAN-CVE-2026-42769","EUVD-2026-35486","GHSA-rpj2-p5pj-r33v","JLSEC-2026-1141","MGASA-2026-0253","RHSA-2026:25237","RHSA-2026:25239","RHSA-2026:42825","RHSA-2026:55543","RHSA-2026:59635","RHSA-2026:59641","RHSA-2026:62562","RHSA-2026:62563","RHSA-2026:62790","RHSA-2026:67551","RLSA-2026:25237","RLSA-2026:25239","SUSE-SU-2026:22251-1","SUSE-SU-2026:22315-1","SUSE-SU-2026:2648-1","UBUNTU-CVE-2026-42769","openSUSE-SU-2026:11023-1","openSUSE-SU-2026:21005-1"],"status":"published","title":"Trust-Anchor Substitution via cert/issuer Typo in CMP rootCaKeyUpdate","description":"Issue Summary: An error in the callback used to verify the certificate\nprovided in a Root CA key update Certificate Management Protocol (CMP)\nmessage response rendered the certificate validation ineffectual, which\ncould lead to escalation of credentials from the Registration Authority (RA)\nlevel to the root Certification Authority (root CA) level.\n\nImpact Summary: The Registration Autority could replace the root CA\ncertificate for the CMP clients with an arbitrary root CA certificate.\n\nOne of the parts of the Certificate Management Protocol (CMP), specified in\nRFC 9810, is Root Certification Authority (root CA) key Rollover,\nwhich is sent by the server in a message with type 'id-it-rootCaKeyUpdate'.\nAs part of these messages, 'newWithOld' certificate, the new root CA\ncertificate signed with the old root CA key, is provided, and verifying its\nsignature is crucial for transferring the trust from the old CA key to the\nnew one.\n\nThe 'id-it-rootCaKeyUpdate' messages are expected to be processed with\nOSSL_CMP_get1_rootCaKeyUpdate(), that is expected to verify the 'newWithOld'\ncertificate.  A typo in the certificate chain building code led to adding\nan incorrect certificate ('newWithOld' instead of 'oldRoot') to the\ncertificate chain, rendering the certificate verification process ineffectual\n(only the issuer name and the algorithm OIDs were verified by other parts\nof the verification code).\n\nAn attacker who already has credentials that satisfy the CMP message\nprotection checks can generate a new key pair and use a crafted self-signed\ncertificate in its 'id-it-rootCaKeyUpdate' CMP messages which affected CMP\nclients would accept as a new trust anchor.\n\nSignificant preconditions for the attack (having valid RA-level credentials)\nare the reason the issue was assigned Low severity.\n\nThe FIPS modules are not affected by this issue, as the affected code is\noutside the OpenSSL FIPS module boundary.","severity":{"version":"3.1","score":5.3,"vector":"CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N","level":"medium","assessor":"adp","from":"cve"},"epss":{"day":"2026-11-10","score":0.00544,"percentile":0.46008,"model":"v2026.06.15"},"facts":{"in_kev":false,"known_exploited":false,"public_exploit":false,"fix_available":true},"cwes":["CWE-295"],"published":"2026-06-09T00:00:00Z","modified":"2026-10-29T11:32:34Z","fixes":[{"ecosystem":"Alpine:v3.22","package":"openssl","fixed_in":["3.5.7-r0"],"sources":["osv"]},{"ecosystem":"Alpine:v3.23","package":"openssl","fixed_in":["3.5.7-r0"],"sources":["osv"]},{"ecosystem":"Alpine:v3.24","package":"openssl","fixed_in":["3.5.7-r0"],"sources":["osv"]},{"ecosystem":"Azure Linux:3","package":"openssl","fixed_in":["3.3.7-4"],"sources":["osv"]},{"ecosystem":"Alpaquita:25","package":"openssl","fixed_in":["3.5.7-r0"],"sources":["osv"]},{"ecosystem":"Alpaquita:stream","package":"openssl","fixed_in":["3.5.7-r0"],"sources":["osv"]},{"ecosystem":"BellSoft Hardened Containers:25","package":"openssl","fixed_in":["3.5.7-r0"],"sources":["osv"]},{"ecosystem":"BellSoft Hardened Containers:stream","package":"openssl","fixed_in":["3.5.7-r0"],"sources":["osv"]},{"ecosystem":"TuxCare:AlmaLinux:9.6","package":"openssl","fixed_in":["1:3.2.2-7.el9_6.tuxcare.1.els7"],"sources":["osv"]},{"ecosystem":"TuxCare:AlmaLinux:9.6","package":"openssl-devel","fixed_in":["1:3.2.2-7.el9_6.tuxcare.1.els7"],"sources":["osv"]},{"ecosystem":"TuxCare:AlmaLinux:9.6","package":"openssl-libs","fixed_in":["1:3.2.2-7.el9_6.tuxcare.1.els7"],"sources":["osv"]},{"ecosystem":"TuxCare:AlmaLinux:9.6","package":"openssl-perl","fixed_in":["1:3.2.2-7.el9_6.tuxcare.1.els7"],"sources":["osv"]},{"ecosystem":"Debian:13","package":"openssl","fixed_in":["3.5.6-1~deb13u2"],"sources":["osv"]},{"ecosystem":"Debian:14","package":"openssl","fixed_in":["3.6.3-1"],"sources":["osv"]},{"ecosystem":"Julia","package":"AppBundler","fixed_in":["1.0.1"],"sources":["osv"]},{"ecosystem":"Julia","package":"OpenSSL_jll","fixed_in":["3.5.7+0"],"sources":["osv"]},{"ecosystem":"Ubuntu:25.10","package":"openssl","fixed_in":["3.5.3-1ubuntu3.4"],"sources":["osv"]},{"ecosystem":"Ubuntu:26.04:LTS","package":"openssl","fixed_in":["3.5.5-1ubuntu3.2"],"sources":["osv"]}],"affected":[{"source":"osv","ecosystem":"Alpine:v3.22","package":"openssl","ranges":[{"type":"ECOSYSTEM","events":[{"introduced":"3.4.0"},{"fixed":"3.5.7-r0"}]}]},{"source":"osv","ecosystem":"Alpine:v3.23","package":"openssl","ranges":[{"type":"ECOSYSTEM","events":[{"introduced":"3.4.0"},{"fixed":"3.5.7-r0"}]}]},{"source":"osv","ecosystem":"Alpine:v3.24","package":"openssl","ranges":[{"type":"ECOSYSTEM","events":[{"introduced":"3.4.0"},{"fixed":"3.5.7-r0"}]}]},{"source":"osv","ecosystem":"AlmaLinux:10","package":"openssl","ranges":[{"type":"ECOSYSTEM","events":[{"introduced":"0"},{"fixed":"1:3.5.5-4.el10_2.alma.1"}]}],"bundled":15},{"source":"osv","ecosystem":"AlmaLinux:10","package":"openssl-devel","ranges":[{"type":"ECOSYSTEM","events":[{"introduced":"0"},{"fixed":"1:3.5.5-4.el10_2.alma.1"}]}],"bundled":15},{"source":"osv","ecosystem":"AlmaLinux:10","package":"openssl-libs","ranges":[{"type":"ECOSYSTEM","events":[{"introduced":"0"},{"fixed":"1:3.5.5-4.el10_2.alma.1"}]}],"bundled":15},{"source":"osv","ecosystem":"AlmaLinux:10","package":"openssl-perl","ranges":[{"type":"ECOSYSTEM","events":[{"introduced":"0"},{"fixed":"1:3.5.5-4.el10_2.alma.1"}]}],"bundled":15},{"source":"osv","ecosystem":"AlmaLinux:9","package":"openssl","ranges":[{"type":"ECOSYSTEM","events":[{"introduced":"0"},{"fixed":"1:3.5.5-4.el9_8"}]}],"bundled":15},{"source":"osv","ecosystem":"AlmaLinux:9","package":"openssl-devel","ranges":[{"type":"ECOSYSTEM","events":[{"introduced":"0"},{"fixed":"1:3.5.5-4.el9_8"}]}],"bundled":15},{"source":"osv","ecosystem":"AlmaLinux:9","package":"openssl-libs","ranges":[{"type":"ECOSYSTEM","events":[{"introduced":"0"},{"fixed":"1:3.5.5-4.el9_8"}]}],"bundled":15},{"source":"osv","ecosystem":"AlmaLinux:9","package":"openssl-perl","ranges":[{"type":"ECOSYSTEM","events":[{"introduced":"0"},{"fixed":"1:3.5.5-4.el9_8"}]}],"bundled":15},{"source":"osv","ecosystem":"Azure Linux:3","package":"openssl","ranges":[{"type":"ECOSYSTEM","events":[{"introduced":"0"},{"fixed":"3.3.7-4"}]}]},{"source":"osv","ecosystem":"Alpaquita:25","package":"openssl","ranges":[{"type":"ECOSYSTEM","events":[{"introduced":"3.5.0-r0"},{"fixed":"3.5.7-r0"}]}]},{"source":"osv","ecosystem":"Alpaquita:stream","package":"openssl","ranges":[{"type":"ECOSYSTEM","events":[{"introduced":"3.1.1-r1"},{"fixed":"3.5.7-r0"}]}]},{"source":"osv","ecosystem":"BellSoft Hardened Containers:25","package":"openssl","ranges":[{"type":"ECOSYSTEM","events":[{"introduced":"3.5.0-r0"},{"fixed":"3.5.7-r0"}]}]},{"source":"osv","ecosystem":"BellSoft Hardened Containers:stream","package":"openssl","ranges":[{"type":"ECOSYSTEM","events":[{"introduced":"3.1.1-r1"},{"fixed":"3.5.7-r0"}]}]},{"source":"osv","ecosystem":"TuxCare:AlmaLinux:9.6","package":"openssl","ranges":[{"type":"ECOSYSTEM","events":[{"introduced":"0"},{"fixed":"1:3.2.2-7.el9_6.tuxcare.1.els7"}]}]},{"source":"osv","ecosystem":"TuxCare:AlmaLinux:9.6","package":"openssl-devel","ranges":[{"type":"ECOSYSTEM","events":[{"introduced":"0"},{"fixed":"1:3.2.2-7.el9_6.tuxcare.1.els7"}]}]},{"source":"osv","ecosystem":"TuxCare:AlmaLinux:9.6","package":"openssl-libs","ranges":[{"type":"ECOSYSTEM","events":[{"introduced":"0"},{"fixed":"1:3.2.2-7.el9_6.tuxcare.1.els7"}]}]},{"source":"osv","ecosystem":"TuxCare:AlmaLinux:9.6","package":"openssl-perl","ranges":[{"type":"ECOSYSTEM","events":[{"introduced":"0"},{"fixed":"1:3.2.2-7.el9_6.tuxcare.1.els7"}]}]},{"source":"osv","ecosystem":"Debian:13","package":"openssl","ranges":[{"type":"ECOSYSTEM","events":[{"introduced":"0"},{"fixed":"3.5.6-1~deb13u2"}]}],"versions":["3.5.1-1","3.5.1-1+deb13u1","3.5.2-1","3.5.3-1","3.5.4-1","3.5.4-1~deb13u1","3.5.4-1~deb13u2","3.5.5-1","3.5.5-1~deb13u1","3.5.5-1~deb13u2","3.5.6-1~deb13u1"]},{"source":"osv","ecosystem":"Debian:14","package":"openssl","ranges":[{"type":"ECOSYSTEM","events":[{"introduced":"0"},{"fixed":"3.6.3-1"}]}],"versions":["3.5.1-1","3.5.2-1","3.5.3-1","3.5.4-1","3.5.4-1~deb13u1","3.5.4-1~deb13u2","3.5.5-1","3.5.5-1~deb13u1","3.5.5-1~deb13u2","3.5.6-1~deb13u1","3.5.6-1~deb13u2","3.5.7-1~deb13u1","3.5.7-1~deb13u2","3.5.7-1~deb13u3","3.6.0-1","3.6.0-2","3.6.0~~alpha1-1","3.6.0~~beta1-1","3.6.1-1","3.6.1-2","3.6.1-3","3.6.2-1"]},{"source":"osv","ecosystem":"Julia","package":"AppBundler","ranges":[{"type":"SEMVER","events":[{"introduced":"1.0.0"},{"fixed":"1.0.1"}]}]},{"source":"osv","ecosystem":"Julia","package":"OpenSSL_jll","ranges":[{"type":"SEMVER","events":[{"introduced":"3.5.0+0"},{"fixed":"3.5.7+0"}]}]},{"source":"osv","ecosystem":"Julia","package":"Openresty_jll","ranges":[{"type":"SEMVER","events":[{"introduced":"1.29.203+0"}]}]},{"source":"osv","ecosystem":"Mageia:10","package":"openssl","ranges":[{"type":"ECOSYSTEM","events":[{"introduced":"0"},{"fixed":"3.5.7-1.mga10"}]}],"bundled":15},{"source":"osv","ecosystem":"Mageia:9","package":"openssl","ranges":[{"type":"ECOSYSTEM","events":[{"introduced":"0"},{"fixed":"3.0.21-1.mga9"}]}],"bundled":15},{"source":"osv","ecosystem":"Red Hat:enterprise_linux:10.2","package":"openssl-debuginfo","ranges":[{"type":"ECOSYSTEM","events":[{"introduced":"0"},{"fixed":"1:3.5.5-4.el10_2"}]}],"bundled":15},{"source":"osv","ecosystem":"Red Hat:enterprise_linux:10.2","package":"openssl-debugsource","ranges":[{"type":"ECOSYSTEM","events":[{"introduced":"0"},{"fixed":"1:3.5.5-4.el10_2"}]}],"bundled":15},{"source":"osv","ecosystem":"Red Hat:enterprise_linux:10.2","package":"openssl-devel","ranges":[{"type":"ECOSYSTEM","events":[{"introduced":"0"},{"fixed":"1:3.5.5-4.el10_2"}]}],"bundled":15},{"source":"osv","ecosystem":"Red Hat:enterprise_linux:10.2","package":"openssl-libs-debuginfo","ranges":[{"type":"ECOSYSTEM","events":[{"introduced":"0"},{"fixed":"1:3.5.5-4.el10_2"}]}],"bundled":15},{"source":"osv","ecosystem":"Red Hat:enterprise_linux:10.2","package":"openssl-perl","ranges":[{"type":"ECOSYSTEM","events":[{"introduced":"0"},{"fixed":"1:3.5.5-4.el10_2"}]}],"bundled":15},{"source":"osv","ecosystem":"Red Hat:enterprise_linux:10.2","package":"openssl","ranges":[{"type":"ECOSYSTEM","events":[{"introduced":"0"},{"fixed":"1:3.5.5-4.el10_2"}]}],"bundled":15},{"source":"osv","ecosystem":"Red Hat:enterprise_linux:10.2","package":"openssl-libs","ranges":[{"type":"ECOSYSTEM","events":[{"introduced":"0"},{"fixed":"1:3.5.5-4.el10_2"}]}],"bundled":15},{"source":"osv","ecosystem":"Red Hat:enterprise_linux:9::appstream","package":"openssl-debuginfo","ranges":[{"type":"ECOSYSTEM","events":[{"introduced":"0"},{"fixed":"1:3.5.5-4.el9_8"}]}],"bundled":15},{"source":"osv","ecosystem":"Red Hat:enterprise_linux:9::appstream","package":"openssl-debugsource","ranges":[{"type":"ECOSYSTEM","events":[{"introduced":"0"},{"fixed":"1:3.5.5-4.el9_8"}]}],"bundled":15},{"source":"osv","ecosystem":"Red Hat:enterprise_linux:9::appstream","package":"openssl-devel","ranges":[{"type":"ECOSYSTEM","events":[{"introduced":"0"},{"fixed":"1:3.5.5-4.el9_8"}]}],"bundled":15},{"source":"osv","ecosystem":"Red Hat:enterprise_linux:9::appstream","package":"openssl-libs-debuginfo","ranges":[{"type":"ECOSYSTEM","events":[{"introduced":"0"},{"fixed":"1:3.5.5-4.el9_8"}]}],"bundled":15},{"source":"osv","ecosystem":"Red Hat:enterprise_linux:9::appstream","package":"openssl-perl","ranges":[{"type":"ECOSYSTEM","events":[{"introduced":"0"},{"fixed":"1:3.5.5-4.el9_8"}]}],"bundled":15},{"source":"osv","ecosystem":"Red Hat:enterprise_linux:9::baseos","package":"openssl","ranges":[{"type":"ECOSYSTEM","events":[{"introduced":"0"},{"fixed":"1:3.5.5-4.el9_8"}]}],"bundled":15},{"source":"osv","ecosystem":"Red Hat:enterprise_linux:9::baseos","package":"openssl-debuginfo","ranges":[{"type":"ECOSYSTEM","events":[{"introduced":"0"},{"fixed":"1:3.5.5-4.el9_8"}]}],"bundled":15},{"source":"osv","ecosystem":"Red Hat:enterprise_linux:9::baseos","package":"openssl-debugsource","ranges":[{"type":"ECOSYSTEM","events":[{"introduced":"0"},{"fixed":"1:3.5.5-4.el9_8"}]}],"bundled":15},{"source":"osv","ecosystem":"Red Hat:enterprise_linux:9::baseos","package":"openssl-libs","ranges":[{"type":"ECOSYSTEM","events":[{"introduced":"0"},{"fixed":"1:3.5.5-4.el9_8"}]}],"bundled":15},{"source":"osv","ecosystem":"Red Hat:enterprise_linux:9::baseos","package":"openssl-libs-debuginfo","ranges":[{"type":"ECOSYSTEM","events":[{"introduced":"0"},{"fixed":"1:3.5.5-4.el9_8"}]}],"bundled":15},{"source":"osv","ecosystem":"Red Hat:hummingbird:1","package":"chunkah","ranges":[{"type":"ECOSYSTEM","events":[{"introduced":"0"},{"fixed":"0:0.6.0-3.hum1"}]}],"bundled":21},{"source":"osv","ecosystem":"Red Hat:hummingbird:1","package":"python-cryptography","ranges":[{"type":"ECOSYSTEM","events":[{"introduced":"0"},{"fixed":"0:50.0.0-1.hum1"}]}],"bundled":24},{"source":"osv","ecosystem":"Red Hat:hummingbird:1","package":"python3-cryptography","ranges":[{"type":"ECOSYSTEM","events":[{"introduced":"0"},{"fixed":"0:50.0.0-1.hum1"}]}],"bundled":24},{"source":"osv","ecosystem":"Red Hat:hummingbird:1","package":"openssl3","ranges":[{"type":"ECOSYSTEM","events":[{"introduced":"0"},{"fixed":"0:3.5.8-0.1.hum1"}]}],"bundled":27},{"source":"osv","ecosystem":"Red Hat:hummingbird:1","package":"openssl3-devel","ranges":[{"type":"ECOSYSTEM","events":[{"introduced":"0"},{"fixed":"0:3.5.8-0.1.hum1"}]}],"bundled":27},{"source":"osv","ecosystem":"Red Hat:hummingbird:1","package":"openssl3-devel-engine","ranges":[{"type":"ECOSYSTEM","events":[{"introduced":"0"},{"fixed":"0:3.5.8-0.1.hum1"}]}],"bundled":27},{"source":"osv","ecosystem":"Red Hat:hummingbird:1","package":"openssl3-libs","ranges":[{"type":"ECOSYSTEM","events":[{"introduced":"0"},{"fixed":"0:3.5.8-0.1.hum1"}]}],"bundled":27},{"source":"osv","ecosystem":"Red Hat:hummingbird:1","package":"openssl","ranges":[{"type":"ECOSYSTEM","events":[{"introduced":"0"},{"fixed":"0:3.5.8-0.1.hum1"}]}],"bundled":28},{"source":"osv","ecosystem":"Red Hat:hummingbird:1","package":"openssl-config-fips","ranges":[{"type":"ECOSYSTEM","events":[{"introduced":"0"},{"fixed":"0:3.5.8-0.1.hum1"}]}],"bundled":28},{"source":"osv","ecosystem":"Red Hat:hummingbird:1","package":"openssl-devel","ranges":[{"type":"ECOSYSTEM","events":[{"introduced":"0"},{"fixed":"0:3.5.8-0.1.hum1"}]}],"bundled":28},{"source":"osv","ecosystem":"Red Hat:hummingbird:1","package":"openssl-devel-engine","ranges":[{"type":"ECOSYSTEM","events":[{"introduced":"0"},{"fixed":"0:3.5.8-0.1.hum1"}]}],"bundled":28},{"source":"osv","ecosystem":"Red Hat:hummingbird:1","package":"openssl-fips-provider-upstream","ranges":[{"type":"ECOSYSTEM","events":[{"introduced":"0"},{"fixed":"0:3.5.8-0.1.hum1"}]}],"bundled":28},{"source":"osv","ecosystem":"Red Hat:hummingbird:1","package":"openssl-libs","ranges":[{"type":"ECOSYSTEM","events":[{"introduced":"0"},{"fixed":"0:3.5.8-0.1.hum1"}]}],"bundled":28},{"source":"osv","ecosystem":"Red Hat:hummingbird:1","package":"openssl-perl","ranges":[{"type":"ECOSYSTEM","events":[{"introduced":"0"},{"fixed":"0:3.5.8-0.1.hum1"}]}],"bundled":28},{"source":"osv","ecosystem":"Red Hat:hummingbird:1","package":"ruby3.3","ranges":[{"type":"ECOSYSTEM","events":[{"introduced":"0"},{"fixed":"0:3.3.10-23.6.hum1"}]}],"bundled":22},{"source":"osv","ecosystem":"Red Hat:hummingbird:1","package":"ruby3.3-bundled-gems","ranges":[{"type":"ECOSYSTEM","events":[{"introduced":"0"},{"fixed":"0:3.3.10-23.6.hum1"}]}],"bundled":22},{"source":"osv","ecosystem":"Red Hat:hummingbird:1","package":"ruby3.3-default-gems","ranges":[{"type":"ECOSYSTEM","events":[{"introduced":"0"},{"fixed":"0:3.3.10-23.6.hum1"}]}],"bundled":22},{"source":"osv","ecosystem":"Red Hat:hummingbird:1","package":"ruby3.3-devel","ranges":[{"type":"ECOSYSTEM","events":[{"introduced":"0"},{"fixed":"0:3.3.10-23.6.hum1"}]}],"bundled":22},{"source":"osv","ecosystem":"Red Hat:hummingbird:1","package":"ruby3.3-doc","ranges":[{"type":"ECOSYSTEM","events":[{"introduced":"0"},{"fixed":"0:3.3.10-23.6.hum1"}]}],"bundled":22},{"source":"osv","ecosystem":"Red Hat:hummingbird:1","package":"ruby3.3-libs","ranges":[{"type":"ECOSYSTEM","events":[{"introduced":"0"},{"fixed":"0:3.3.10-23.6.hum1"}]}],"bundled":22},{"source":"osv","ecosystem":"Red Hat:hummingbird:1","package":"rubygem3.3-bigdecimal","ranges":[{"type":"ECOSYSTEM","events":[{"introduced":"0"},{"fixed":"0:3.1.5-23.6.hum1"}]}],"bundled":22},{"source":"osv","ecosystem":"Red Hat:hummingbird:1","package":"rubygem3.3-bundler","ranges":[{"type":"ECOSYSTEM","events":[{"introduced":"0"},{"fixed":"0:2.5.22-23.6.hum1"}]}],"bundled":22},{"source":"osv","ecosystem":"Red Hat:hummingbird:1","package":"rubygem3.3-devel","ranges":[{"type":"ECOSYSTEM","events":[{"introduced":"0"},{"fixed":"0:3.5.22-23.6.hum1"}]}],"bundled":22},{"source":"osv","ecosystem":"Red Hat:hummingbird:1","package":"rubygem3.3-io-console","ranges":[{"type":"ECOSYSTEM","events":[{"introduced":"0"},{"fixed":"0:0.7.1-23.6.hum1"}]}],"bundled":22},{"source":"osv","ecosystem":"Red Hat:hummingbird:1","package":"rubygem3.3-irb","ranges":[{"type":"ECOSYSTEM","events":[{"introduced":"0"},{"fixed":"0:1.13.1-23.6.hum1"}]}],"bundled":22},{"source":"osv","ecosystem":"Red Hat:hummingbird:1","package":"rubygem3.3-json","ranges":[{"type":"ECOSYSTEM","events":[{"introduced":"0"},{"fixed":"0:2.7.2-23.6.hum1"}]}],"bundled":22},{"source":"osv","ecosystem":"Red Hat:hummingbird:1","package":"rubygem3.3-minitest","ranges":[{"type":"ECOSYSTEM","events":[{"introduced":"0"},{"fixed":"0:5.20.0-23.6.hum1"}]}],"bundled":22},{"source":"osv","ecosystem":"Red Hat:hummingbird:1","package":"rubygem3.3-power_assert","ranges":[{"type":"ECOSYSTEM","events":[{"introduced":"0"},{"fixed":"0:2.0.3-23.6.hum1"}]}],"bundled":22},{"source":"osv","ecosystem":"Red Hat:hummingbird:1","package":"rubygem3.3-psych","ranges":[{"type":"ECOSYSTEM","events":[{"introduced":"0"},{"fixed":"0:5.1.2-23.6.hum1"}]}],"bundled":22},{"source":"osv","ecosystem":"Red Hat:hummingbird:1","package":"rubygem3.3-racc","ranges":[{"type":"ECOSYSTEM","events":[{"introduced":"0"},{"fixed":"0:1.7.3-23.6.hum1"}]}],"bundled":22},{"source":"osv","ecosystem":"Red Hat:hummingbird:1","package":"rubygem3.3-rake","ranges":[{"type":"ECOSYSTEM","events":[{"introduced":"0"},{"fixed":"0:13.1.0-23.6.hum1"}]}],"bundled":22},{"source":"osv","ecosystem":"Red Hat:hummingbird:1","package":"rubygem3.3-rbs","ranges":[{"type":"ECOSYSTEM","events":[{"introduced":"0"},{"fixed":"0:3.4.0-23.6.hum1"}]}],"bundled":22},{"source":"osv","ecosystem":"Red Hat:hummingbird:1","package":"rubygem3.3-rdoc","ranges":[{"type":"ECOSYSTEM","events":[{"introduced":"0"},{"fixed":"0:6.6.3.1-23.6.hum1"}]}],"bundled":22},{"source":"osv","ecosystem":"Red Hat:hummingbird:1","package":"rubygem3.3-rexml","ranges":[{"type":"ECOSYSTEM","events":[{"introduced":"0"},{"fixed":"0:3.4.4-23.6.hum1"}]}],"bundled":22},{"source":"osv","ecosystem":"Red Hat:hummingbird:1","package":"rubygem3.3-rss","ranges":[{"type":"ECOSYSTEM","events":[{"introduced":"0"},{"fixed":"0:0.3.1-23.6.hum1"}]}],"bundled":22},{"source":"osv","ecosystem":"Red Hat:hummingbird:1","package":"rubygem3.3-rubygems","ranges":[{"type":"ECOSYSTEM","events":[{"introduced":"0"},{"fixed":"0:3.5.22-23.6.hum1"}]}],"bundled":22},{"source":"osv","ecosystem":"Red Hat:hummingbird:1","package":"rubygem3.3-test-unit","ranges":[{"type":"ECOSYSTEM","events":[{"introduced":"0"},{"fixed":"0:3.6.1-23.6.hum1"}]}],"bundled":22},{"source":"osv","ecosystem":"Red Hat:hummingbird:1","package":"rubygem3.3-typeprof","ranges":[{"type":"ECOSYSTEM","events":[{"introduced":"0"},{"fixed":"0:0.21.9-23.6.hum1"}]}],"bundled":22},{"source":"osv","ecosystem":"Red Hat:hummingbird:1","package":"ruby4.0","ranges":[{"type":"ECOSYSTEM","events":[{"introduced":"0"},{"fixed":"0:4.0.6-37.3.hum1"}]}],"bundled":21},{"source":"osv","ecosystem":"Red Hat:hummingbird:1","package":"ruby4.0-bundled-gems","ranges":[{"type":"ECOSYSTEM","events":[{"introduced":"0"},{"fixed":"0:4.0.6-37.3.hum1"}]}],"bundled":21},{"source":"osv","ecosystem":"Red Hat:hummingbird:1","package":"ruby4.0-default-gems","ranges":[{"type":"ECOSYSTEM","events":[{"introduced":"0"},{"fixed":"0:4.0.6-37.3.hum1"}]}],"bundled":21},{"source":"osv","ecosystem":"Red Hat:hummingbird:1","package":"ruby4.0-devel","ranges":[{"type":"ECOSYSTEM","events":[{"introduced":"0"},{"fixed":"0:4.0.6-37.3.hum1"}]}],"bundled":21},{"source":"osv","ecosystem":"Red Hat:hummingbird:1","package":"ruby4.0-doc","ranges":[{"type":"ECOSYSTEM","events":[{"introduced":"0"},{"fixed":"0:4.0.6-37.3.hum1"}]}],"bundled":21},{"source":"osv","ecosystem":"Red Hat:hummingbird:1","package":"ruby4.0-libs","ranges":[{"type":"ECOSYSTEM","events":[{"introduced":"0"},{"fixed":"0:4.0.6-37.3.hum1"}]}],"bundled":21},{"source":"osv","ecosystem":"Red Hat:hummingbird:1","package":"rubygem4.0-bigdecimal","ranges":[{"type":"ECOSYSTEM","events":[{"introduced":"0"},{"fixed":"0:4.0.1-37.3.hum1"}]}],"bundled":21},{"source":"osv","ecosystem":"Red Hat:hummingbird:1","package":"rubygem4.0-bundler","ranges":[{"type":"ECOSYSTEM","events":[{"introduced":"0"},{"fixed":"0:4.0.16-37.3.hum1"}]}],"bundled":21},{"source":"osv","ecosystem":"Red Hat:hummingbird:1","package":"rubygem4.0-devel","ranges":[{"type":"ECOSYSTEM","events":[{"introduced":"0"},{"fixed":"0:4.0.16-37.3.hum1"}]}],"bundled":21},{"source":"osv","ecosystem":"Red Hat:hummingbird:1","package":"rubygem4.0-io-console","ranges":[{"type":"ECOSYSTEM","events":[{"introduced":"0"},{"fixed":"0:0.8.2-37.3.hum1"}]}],"bundled":21},{"source":"osv","ecosystem":"Red Hat:hummingbird:1","package":"rubygem4.0-irb","ranges":[{"type":"ECOSYSTEM","events":[{"introduced":"0"},{"fixed":"0:1.16.0-37.3.hum1"}]}],"bundled":21},{"source":"osv","ecosystem":"Red Hat:hummingbird:1","package":"rubygem4.0-json","ranges":[{"type":"ECOSYSTEM","events":[{"introduced":"0"},{"fixed":"0:2.18.0-37.3.hum1"}]}],"bundled":21},{"source":"osv","ecosystem":"Red Hat:hummingbird:1","package":"rubygem4.0-minitest","ranges":[{"type":"ECOSYSTEM","events":[{"introduced":"0"},{"fixed":"0:6.0.0-37.3.hum1"}]}],"bundled":21},{"source":"osv","ecosystem":"Red Hat:hummingbird:1","package":"rubygem4.0-power_assert","ranges":[{"type":"ECOSYSTEM","events":[{"introduced":"0"},{"fixed":"0:3.0.1-37.3.hum1"}]}],"bundled":21},{"source":"osv","ecosystem":"Red Hat:hummingbird:1","package":"rubygem4.0-psych","ranges":[{"type":"ECOSYSTEM","events":[{"introduced":"0"},{"fixed":"0:5.3.1-37.3.hum1"}]}],"bundled":21},{"source":"osv","ecosystem":"Red Hat:hummingbird:1","package":"rubygem4.0-racc","ranges":[{"type":"ECOSYSTEM","events":[{"introduced":"0"},{"fixed":"0:1.8.1-37.3.hum1"}]}],"bundled":21},{"source":"osv","ecosystem":"Red Hat:hummingbird:1","package":"rubygem4.0-rake","ranges":[{"type":"ECOSYSTEM","events":[{"introduced":"0"},{"fixed":"0:13.3.1-37.3.hum1"}]}],"bundled":21},{"source":"osv","ecosystem":"Red Hat:hummingbird:1","package":"rubygem4.0-rbs","ranges":[{"type":"ECOSYSTEM","events":[{"introduced":"0"},{"fixed":"0:3.10.0-37.3.hum1"}]}],"bundled":21},{"source":"osv","ecosystem":"Red Hat:hummingbird:1","package":"rubygem4.0-rdoc","ranges":[{"type":"ECOSYSTEM","events":[{"introduced":"0"},{"fixed":"0:7.0.4-37.3.hum1"}]}],"bundled":21},{"source":"osv","ecosystem":"Red Hat:hummingbird:1","package":"rubygem4.0-rexml","ranges":[{"type":"ECOSYSTEM","events":[{"introduced":"0"},{"fixed":"0:3.4.4-37.3.hum1"}]}],"bundled":21},{"source":"osv","ecosystem":"Red Hat:hummingbird:1","package":"rubygem4.0-rss","ranges":[{"type":"ECOSYSTEM","events":[{"introduced":"0"},{"fixed":"0:0.3.2-37.3.hum1"}]}],"bundled":21},{"source":"osv","ecosystem":"Red Hat:hummingbird:1","package":"rubygem4.0-rubygems","ranges":[{"type":"ECOSYSTEM","events":[{"introduced":"0"},{"fixed":"0:4.0.16-37.3.hum1"}]}],"bundled":21},{"source":"osv","ecosystem":"Red Hat:hummingbird:1","package":"rubygem4.0-test-unit","ranges":[{"type":"ECOSYSTEM","events":[{"introduced":"0"},{"fixed":"0:3.7.5-37.3.hum1"}]}],"bundled":21},{"source":"osv","ecosystem":"Red Hat:hummingbird:1","package":"rubygem4.0-typeprof","ranges":[{"type":"ECOSYSTEM","events":[{"introduced":"0"},{"fixed":"0:0.31.1-37.3.hum1"}]}],"bundled":21},{"source":"osv","ecosystem":"Red Hat:hummingbird:1","package":"ruby3.4","ranges":[{"type":"ECOSYSTEM","events":[{"introduced":"0"},{"fixed":"0:3.4.10-31.7.hum1"}]}],"bundled":19},{"source":"osv","ecosystem":"Red Hat:hummingbird:1","package":"ruby3.4-bundled-gems","ranges":[{"type":"ECOSYSTEM","events":[{"introduced":"0"},{"fixed":"0:3.4.10-31.7.hum1"}]}],"bundled":19},{"source":"osv","ecosystem":"Red Hat:hummingbird:1","package":"ruby3.4-default-gems","ranges":[{"type":"ECOSYSTEM","events":[{"introduced":"0"},{"fixed":"0:3.4.10-31.7.hum1"}]}],"bundled":19},{"source":"osv","ecosystem":"Red Hat:hummingbird:1","package":"ruby3.4-devel","ranges":[{"type":"ECOSYSTEM","events":[{"introduced":"0"},{"fixed":"0:3.4.10-31.7.hum1"}]}],"bundled":19},{"source":"osv","ecosystem":"Red Hat:hummingbird:1","package":"ruby3.4-doc","ranges":[{"type":"ECOSYSTEM","events":[{"introduced":"0"},{"fixed":"0:3.4.10-31.7.hum1"}]}],"bundled":19},{"source":"osv","ecosystem":"Red Hat:hummingbird:1","package":"ruby3.4-libs","ranges":[{"type":"ECOSYSTEM","events":[{"introduced":"0"},{"fixed":"0:3.4.10-31.7.hum1"}]}],"bundled":19},{"source":"osv","ecosystem":"Red Hat:hummingbird:1","package":"bootupd","ranges":[{"type":"ECOSYSTEM","events":[{"introduced":"0"},{"fixed":"0:0.3.2-1.hum1"}]}],"bundled":19},{"source":"osv","ecosystem":"Red Hat:hummingbird:1","package":"rust-bootupd","ranges":[{"type":"ECOSYSTEM","events":[{"introduced":"0"},{"fixed":"0:0.3.2-1.hum1"}]}],"bundled":19},{"source":"osv","ecosystem":"Rocky Linux:10","package":"openssl","ranges":[{"type":"ECOSYSTEM","events":[{"introduced":"0"},{"fixed":"1:3.5.5-4.el10_2"}]}],"bundled":15},{"source":"osv","ecosystem":"Rocky Linux:9","package":"openssl","ranges":[{"type":"ECOSYSTEM","events":[{"introduced":"0"},{"fixed":"1:3.5.5-4.el9_8"}]}],"bundled":15},{"source":"osv","ecosystem":"SUSE:Linux Micro 6.2","package":"openssl-3","ranges":[{"type":"ECOSYSTEM","events":[{"introduced":"0"},{"fixed":"3.5.0-160000.8.1"}]}],"bundled":15},{"source":"osv","ecosystem":"SUSE:Linux Enterprise Server 16.0","package":"openssl-3","ranges":[{"type":"ECOSYSTEM","events":[{"introduced":"0"},{"fixed":"3.5.0-160000.8.1"}]}],"bundled":15},{"source":"osv","ecosystem":"SUSE:Linux Enterprise Server for SAP applications 16.0","package":"openssl-3","ranges":[{"type":"ECOSYSTEM","events":[{"introduced":"0"},{"fixed":"3.5.0-160000.8.1"}]}],"bundled":15},{"source":"osv","ecosystem":"SUSE:Linux Enterprise Module for Basesystem 15 SP7","package":"openssl-3","ranges":[{"type":"ECOSYSTEM","events":[{"introduced":"0"},{"fixed":"3.2.3-150700.5.36.1"}]}],"bundled":13},{"source":"osv","ecosystem":"Ubuntu:Pro:22.04:LTS","package":"nodejs","ranges":[{"type":"ECOSYSTEM","events":[{"introduced":"0"}]}],"versions":["12.22.5~dfsg-5ubuntu1","12.22.7~dfsg-2ubuntu1","12.22.7~dfsg-2ubuntu3","12.22.9~dfsg-1ubuntu2","12.22.9~dfsg-1ubuntu3","12.22.9~dfsg-1ubuntu3.1","12.22.9~dfsg-1ubuntu3.2","12.22.9~dfsg-1ubuntu3.3","12.22.9~dfsg-1ubuntu3.4","12.22.9~dfsg-1ubuntu3.5","12.22.9~dfsg-1ubuntu3.6","12.22.9~dfsg-1ubuntu3.6+esm2"]},{"source":"osv","ecosystem":"Ubuntu:25.10","package":"edk2","ranges":[{"type":"ECOSYSTEM","events":[{"introduced":"0"}]}],"versions":["2025.02-3ubuntu2","2025.02-8","2025.02-8ubuntu1","2025.02-8ubuntu2","2025.02-8ubuntu3","2025.02-8ubuntu3.1","2025.02-8ubuntu3.2"]},{"source":"osv","ecosystem":"Ubuntu:25.10","package":"openssl","ranges":[{"type":"ECOSYSTEM","events":[{"introduced":"0"},{"fixed":"3.5.3-1ubuntu3.4"}]}],"versions":["3.4.1-1ubuntu3","3.5.0-2ubuntu1","3.5.2-1ubuntu1","3.5.3-1ubuntu2","3.5.3-1ubuntu3","3.5.3-1ubuntu3.3"]},{"source":"osv","ecosystem":"Ubuntu:26.10","package":"edk2","ranges":[{"type":"ECOSYSTEM","events":[{"introduced":"0"}]}],"versions":["2025.11-3ubuntu7","2025.11-3ubuntu8","2026.05-2ubuntu1","2026.05-2ubuntu2","2026.05-2ubuntu3"]},{"source":"osv","ecosystem":"Ubuntu:26.10","package":"edk2-hwe","ranges":[{"type":"ECOSYSTEM","events":[{"introduced":"0"}]}],"versions":["2025.11-3ubuntu8","2025.11-3ubuntu9","2026.05-2ubuntu1","2026.05-2ubuntu2","2026.05-2ubuntu3"]},{"source":"osv","ecosystem":"Ubuntu:26.04:LTS","package":"edk2","ranges":[{"type":"ECOSYSTEM","events":[{"introduced":"0"}]}],"versions":["2025.02-8ubuntu3","2025.11-3ubuntu6","2025.11-3ubuntu7","2025.11-3ubuntu7.2","2025.11-3ubuntu7.3"]},{"source":"osv","ecosystem":"Ubuntu:26.04:LTS","package":"edk2-hwe","ranges":[{"type":"ECOSYSTEM","events":[{"introduced":"0"}]}],"versions":["2025.11-3ubuntu6","2025.11-3ubuntu8","2025.11-3ubuntu8.2"]},{"source":"osv","ecosystem":"Ubuntu:26.04:LTS","package":"openssl","ranges":[{"type":"ECOSYSTEM","events":[{"introduced":"0"},{"fixed":"3.5.5-1ubuntu3.2"}]}],"versions":["3.5.3-1ubuntu2","3.5.5-1ubuntu1","3.5.5-1ubuntu3"]},{"source":"osv","ecosystem":"openSUSE:Tumbleweed","package":"openssl-3","ranges":[{"type":"ECOSYSTEM","events":[{"introduced":"0"},{"fixed":"3.5.3-6.1"}]}],"bundled":14},{"source":"osv","ecosystem":"openSUSE:Leap 16.0","package":"openssl-3","ranges":[{"type":"ECOSYSTEM","events":[{"introduced":"0"},{"fixed":"3.5.0-160000.8.1"}]}],"bundled":15}],"products":[{"vendor":"openssl","product":"openssl"}],"references":[{"url":"https://openssl-library.org/news/secadv/20260609.txt","tags":["vendor-advisory","Vendor Advisory","advisory","web","report"]},{"url":"https://github.com/openssl/openssl/commit/d531f21c0fe99067a66fc0ff1161ef127f9cd70b","tags":["patch","Patch","fix","web"]},{"url":"https://github.com/openssl/openssl/commit/d35cd473a271bf3ce7bf3d32af53217fb83ae92c","tags":["patch","Patch","fix","web"]},{"url":"https://github.com/openssl/openssl/commit/54d0989997e5fc26057009a9782c3441ce3842fb","tags":["patch","Patch","fix","web"]},{"url":"https://github.com/openssl/openssl/commit/777b363b16fcf2153bb3ded39dc3838713667c44","tags":["patch","Patch","fix","web"]},{"url":"https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-42769","tags":["web","advisory"]},{"url":"https://github.com/openssl/security/commit/54d0989997e5fc26057009a9782c3441ce3842fb","tags":["web"]},{"url":"https://github.com/openssl/security/commit/777b363b16fcf2153bb3ded39dc3838713667c44","tags":["web"]},{"url":"https://github.com/openssl/security/commit/d35cd473a271bf3ce7bf3d32af53217fb83ae92c","tags":["web"]},{"url":"https://github.com/openssl/security/commit/d531f21c0fe99067a66fc0ff1161ef127f9cd70b","tags":["web"]},{"url":"https://github.com/advisories/GHSA-rpj2-p5pj-r33v","tags":["web"]},{"url":"https://security.alpinelinux.org/vuln/CVE-2026-42769","tags":["advisory"]},{"url":"https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:25237","tags":["advisory"]},{"url":"https://access.redhat.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-34180","tags":["report"]},{"url":"https://access.redhat.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-34181","tags":["report"]},{"url":"https://access.redhat.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-34182","tags":["report"]},{"url":"https://access.redhat.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-34183","tags":["report"]},{"url":"https://access.redhat.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-42764","tags":["report"]},{"url":"https://access.redhat.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-42766","tags":["report"]},{"url":"https://access.redhat.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-42767","tags":["report"]},{"url":"https://access.redhat.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-42768","tags":["report"]},{"url":"https://access.redhat.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-42769","tags":["report"]},{"url":"https://access.redhat.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-42770","tags":["report"]},{"url":"https://access.redhat.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-45445","tags":["report"]},{"url":"https://access.redhat.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-45446","tags":["report"]},{"url":"https://access.redhat.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-45447","tags":["report"]},{"url":"https://access.redhat.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-7383","tags":["report"]},{"url":"https://access.redhat.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-9076","tags":["report"]},{"url":"https://bugzilla.redhat.com/2481879","tags":["report"]},{"url":"https://bugzilla.redhat.com/2481880","tags":["report"]},{"url":"https://bugzilla.redhat.com/2481881","tags":["report"]},{"url":"https://bugzilla.redhat.com/2481882","tags":["report"]},{"url":"https://bugzilla.redhat.com/2481884","tags":["report"]},{"url":"https://bugzilla.redhat.com/2481885","tags":["report"]},{"url":"https://bugzilla.redhat.com/2481887","tags":["report"]},{"url":"https://bugzilla.redhat.com/2481890","tags":["report"]},{"url":"https://bugzilla.redhat.com/2481891","tags":["report"]},{"url":"https://bugzilla.redhat.com/2481892","tags":["report"]},{"url":"https://bugzilla.redhat.com/2481893","tags":["report"]},{"url":"https://bugzilla.redhat.com/2481894","tags":["report"]},{"url":"https://bugzilla.redhat.com/2481896","tags":["report"]},{"url":"https://bugzilla.redhat.com/2481897","tags":["report"]},{"url":"https://bugzilla.redhat.com/2481898","tags":["report"]},{"url":"https://errata.almalinux.org/10/ALSA-2026-25237.html","tags":["advisory"]},{"url":"https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:25239","tags":["advisory"]},{"url":"https://errata.almalinux.org/9/ALSA-2026-25239.html","tags":["advisory"]},{"url":"https://docs.bell-sw.com/security/cves/CVE-2026-42769","tags":["advisory"]},{"url":"https://errata.tuxcare.com/els_os/tuxcare9.6esu/CLSA-2026-1782386492.html","tags":["advisory"]},{"url":"https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-34180","tags":["advisory"]},{"url":"https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-34182","tags":["advisory"]},{"url":"https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-34183","tags":["advisory"]},{"url":"https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-42766","tags":["advisory"]},{"url":"https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-42767","tags":["advisory"]},{"url":"https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-42768","tags":["advisory"]},{"url":"https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-42770","tags":["advisory"]},{"url":"https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-45445","tags":["advisory"]},{"url":"https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-45446","tags":["advisory"]},{"url":"https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-45447","tags":["advisory"]},{"url":"https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-7383","tags":["advisory"]},{"url":"https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-9076","tags":["advisory"]},{"url":"https://github.com/CVEProject/cvelistV5/tree/main/cves/2026/42xxx/CVE-2026-42769.json","tags":["advisory"]},{"url":"https://security-tracker.debian.org/tracker/CVE-2026-42769","tags":["advisory"]},{"url":"https://advisories.mageia.org/MGASA-2026-0253.html","tags":["advisory"]},{"url":"https://bugs.mageia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=35662","tags":["report"]},{"url":"https://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2026/06/09/15","tags":["web"]},{"url":"https://ubuntu.com/security/notices/USN-8414-1","tags":["advisory"]},{"url":"https://lists.debian.org/debian-security-announce/2026/msg00245.html","tags":["web"]},{"url":"https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-announce@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/M6FSVWKLYXUHNRSEKJHJA6OVPW64N45U/","tags":["web"]},{"url":"https://lists.opensuse.org/archives/list/security-announce@lists.opensuse.org/message/YTQ27HDP33LD6AS24REY2JEVD6LKVTQQ/","tags":["web"]},{"url":"https://access.redhat.com/security/updates/classification/#important","tags":["article"]},{"url":"https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2481879","tags":["report"]},{"url":"https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2481880","tags":["report"]},{"url":"https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2481881","tags":["report"]},{"url":"https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2481882","tags":["report"]},{"url":"https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2481884","tags":["report"]},{"url":"https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2481885","tags":["report"]},{"url":"https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2481887","tags":["report"]},{"url":"https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2481890","tags":["report"]},{"url":"https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2481891","tags":["report"]},{"url":"https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2481892","tags":["report"]},{"url":"https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2481893","tags":["report"]},{"url":"https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2481894","tags":["report"]},{"url":"https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2481896","tags":["report"]},{"url":"https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2481897","tags":["report"]},{"url":"https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2481898","tags":["report"]},{"url":"https://security.access.redhat.com/data/csaf/v2/advisories/2026/rhsa-2026_25237.json","tags":["advisory"]},{"url":"https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-7383","tags":["advisory"]},{"url":"https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-9076","tags":["advisory"]},{"url":"https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-34180","tags":["advisory"]},{"url":"https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-34181","tags":["advisory"]},{"url":"https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-34181","tags":["advisory"]},{"url":"https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-34182","tags":["advisory"]},{"url":"https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-34183","tags":["advisory"]},{"url":"https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-42764","tags":["advisory"]},{"url":"https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-42764","tags":["advisory"]},{"url":"https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-42766","tags":["advisory"]},{"url":"https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-42767","tags":["advisory"]},{"url":"https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-42768","tags":["advisory"]},{"url":"https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-42769","tags":["advisory","report"]},{"url":"https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-42770","tags":["advisory"]},{"url":"https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-45445","tags":["advisory"]},{"url":"https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-45446","tags":["advisory"]},{"url":"https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-45447","tags":["advisory"]},{"url":"https://security.access.redhat.com/data/csaf/v2/advisories/2026/rhsa-2026_25239.json","tags":["advisory"]},{"url":"https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:42825","tags":["advisory"]},{"url":"https://images.redhat.com/","tags":["article"]},{"url":"https://access.redhat.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-54876","tags":["report"]},{"url":"https://access.redhat.com/security/updates/classification/","tags":["article"]},{"url":"https://access.redhat.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-75803","tags":["report"]},{"url":"https://access.redhat.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-42765","tags":["report"]},{"url":"https://access.redhat.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-42771","tags":["report"]},{"url":"https://access.redhat.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-35188","tags":["report"]},{"url":"https://access.redhat.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-93599","tags":["report"]},{"url":"https://security.access.redhat.com/data/csaf/v2/advisories/2026/rhsa-2026_42825.json","tags":["advisory"]},{"url":"https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2481886","tags":["report"]},{"url":"https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-35188","tags":["advisory"]},{"url":"https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-35188","tags":["advisory"]},{"url":"https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2481889","tags":["report"]},{"url":"https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-42765","tags":["advisory"]},{"url":"https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-42765","tags":["advisory"]},{"url":"https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2481895","tags":["report"]},{"url":"https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-42771","tags":["advisory"]},{"url":"https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-42771","tags":["advisory"]},{"url":"https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2511600","tags":["report"]},{"url":"https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-54876","tags":["advisory"]},{"url":"https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-54876","tags":["advisory"]},{"url":"https://github.com/openssl/openssl/commit/155b5fe0f93365e6df1c56ee3606b121080c6c12","tags":["article"]},{"url":"https://github.com/openssl/openssl/commit/d8c51048ac037a21bae0f41cad7a3920dc7f3638","tags":["article"]},{"url":"https://openssl-library.org/news/secadv/20260805.txt","tags":["article"]},{"url":"https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2523425","tags":["report"]},{"url":"https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-75803","tags":["advisory"]},{"url":"https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-75803","tags":["advisory"]},{"url":"https://github.com/openssl/openssl/commit/119ab9555dc62275bbd71f6f49529b1a44feba42","tags":["article"]},{"url":"https://github.com/openssl/openssl/commit/3621257986e27e540bf96a11570929a6e5a9e05b","tags":["article"]},{"url":"https://github.com/openssl/openssl/commit/6c7aa6f8f6449b7fe0137ee8be65fcd239bd7d6a","tags":["article"]},{"url":"https://github.com/openssl/openssl/commit/bdeb0cd994d915342787f117ee75044f0dc36f34","tags":["article"]},{"url":"https://github.com/openssl/openssl/commit/bf95f5f772e9362f87b25cfa2f8cb15d984865b9","tags":["article"]},{"url":"https://openssl-library.org/news/secadv/20260825.txt","tags":["article"]},{"url":"https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2538431","tags":["report"]},{"url":"https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-93599","tags":["advisory"]},{"url":"https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-93599","tags":["advisory"]},{"url":"https://github.com/rustls/webpki/security/advisories/GHSA-82j2-j2ch-gfr8","tags":["article"]},{"url":"https://www.vulncheck.com/advisories/rustls-webpki-before-0.103.13-panic-via-empty-bit-string","tags":["article"]},{"url":"https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:55543","tags":["advisory"]},{"url":"https://access.redhat.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-69248","tags":["report"]},{"url":"https://access.redhat.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-69249","tags":["report"]},{"url":"https://access.redhat.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-69247","tags":["report"]},{"url":"https://access.redhat.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-84782","tags":["report"]},{"url":"https://security.access.redhat.com/data/csaf/v2/advisories/2026/rhsa-2026_55543.json","tags":["advisory"]},{"url":"https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2510835","tags":["report"]},{"url":"https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-69247","tags":["advisory"]},{"url":"https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-69247","tags":["advisory"]},{"url":"https://github.com/pyca/cryptography/commit/53fccd93413a8d7f07d6d8999681f27b75cffa3f","tags":["article"]},{"url":"https://github.com/pyca/cryptography/pull/15369","tags":["article"]},{"url":"https://github.com/pyca/cryptography/security/advisories/GHSA-g6cj-pr64-35w5","tags":["article"]},{"url":"https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2510830","tags":["report"]},{"url":"https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-69248","tags":["advisory"]},{"url":"https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-69248","tags":["advisory"]},{"url":"https://github.com/pyca/cryptography/commit/4d035a4225965edeffd312079a510ef25fcfdcb2","tags":["article"]},{"url":"https://github.com/pyca/cryptography/pull/14888","tags":["article"]},{"url":"https://github.com/pyca/cryptography/security/advisories/GHSA-m2h6-j472-rp4c","tags":["article"]},{"url":"https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2510815","tags":["report"]},{"url":"https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-69249","tags":["advisory"]},{"url":"https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-69249","tags":["advisory"]},{"url":"https://github.com/pyca/cryptography/commit/4a12cf49675a184e47f912b00b04f3a629283582","tags":["article"]},{"url":"https://github.com/pyca/cryptography/pull/14960","tags":["article"]},{"url":"https://github.com/pyca/cryptography/security/advisories/GHSA-jwv3-5hgf-82ww","tags":["article"]},{"url":"https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2537080","tags":["report"]},{"url":"https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-84782","tags":["advisory"]},{"url":"https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-84782","tags":["advisory"]},{"url":"https://openssl-library.org/news/vulnerabilities/#CVE-2026-84782","tags":["article"]},{"url":"https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:59635","tags":["advisory"]},{"url":"https://access.redhat.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-63074","tags":["report"]},{"url":"https://access.redhat.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-63073","tags":["report"]},{"url":"https://access.redhat.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-14457","tags":["report"]},{"url":"https://access.redhat.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-63076","tags":["report"]},{"url":"https://access.redhat.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-63075","tags":["report"]},{"url":"https://access.redhat.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-63072","tags":["report"]},{"url":"https://access.redhat.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-54874","tags":["report"]},{"url":"https://access.redhat.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-18798","tags":["report"]},{"url":"https://security.access.redhat.com/data/csaf/v2/advisories/2026/rhsa-2026_59635.json","tags":["advisory"]},{"url":"https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2517562","tags":["report"]},{"url":"https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-14457","tags":["advisory"]},{"url":"https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-14457","tags":["advisory"]},{"url":"https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2517559","tags":["report"]},{"url":"https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-18798","tags":["advisory"]},{"url":"https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-18798","tags":["advisory"]},{"url":"https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2517564","tags":["report"]},{"url":"https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-54874","tags":["advisory"]},{"url":"https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-54874","tags":["advisory"]},{"url":"https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2517560","tags":["report"]},{"url":"https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-63072","tags":["advisory"]},{"url":"https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-63072","tags":["advisory"]},{"url":"https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2517565","tags":["report"]},{"url":"https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-63073","tags":["advisory"]},{"url":"https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-63073","tags":["advisory"]},{"url":"https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2517566","tags":["report"]},{"url":"https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-63074","tags":["advisory"]},{"url":"https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-63074","tags":["advisory"]},{"url":"https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2517570","tags":["report"]},{"url":"https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-63075","tags":["advisory"]},{"url":"https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-63075","tags":["advisory"]},{"url":"https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2517561","tags":["report"]},{"url":"https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-63076","tags":["advisory"]},{"url":"https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-63076","tags":["advisory"]},{"url":"https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:59641","tags":["advisory"]},{"url":"https://access.redhat.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-84783","tags":["report"]},{"url":"https://security.access.redhat.com/data/csaf/v2/advisories/2026/rhsa-2026_59641.json","tags":["advisory"]},{"url":"https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2543243","tags":["report"]},{"url":"https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-84783","tags":["advisory"]},{"url":"https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-84783","tags":["advisory"]},{"url":"https://github.com/openssl/openssl/commit/de97a1a54f43edefd43b5084ecac54ecadb33081","tags":["article"]},{"url":"https://openssl-library.org/news/secadv/20260929.txt","tags":["article"]},{"url":"https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:62562","tags":["advisory"]},{"url":"https://access.redhat.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-80212","tags":["report"]},{"url":"https://access.redhat.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-80213","tags":["report"]},{"url":"https://security.access.redhat.com/data/csaf/v2/advisories/2026/rhsa-2026_62562.json","tags":["advisory"]},{"url":"https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2525066","tags":["report"]},{"url":"https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-80212","tags":["advisory"]},{"url":"https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-80212","tags":["advisory"]},{"url":"https://github.com/ruby/resolv/commit/6393c628b224d0234ef915813c0977e11ebe57ea","tags":["article"]},{"url":"https://www.ruby-lang.org/en/news/2026/08/27/multiple-vulnerabilities-in-resolv/","tags":["article"]},{"url":"https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2525014","tags":["report"]},{"url":"https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-80213","tags":["advisory"]},{"url":"https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-80213","tags":["advisory"]},{"url":"https://github.com/ruby/resolv/commit/b336e42d6a3e2a824308f7b47fa26a968641b366","tags":["article"]},{"url":"https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:62563","tags":["advisory"]},{"url":"https://security.access.redhat.com/data/csaf/v2/advisories/2026/rhsa-2026_62563.json","tags":["advisory"]},{"url":"https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:62790","tags":["advisory"]},{"url":"https://security.access.redhat.com/data/csaf/v2/advisories/2026/rhsa-2026_62790.json","tags":["advisory"]},{"url":"https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:67551","tags":["advisory"]},{"url":"https://security.access.redhat.com/data/csaf/v2/advisories/2026/rhsa-2026_67551.json","tags":["advisory"]},{"url":"https://errata.rockylinux.org/RLSA-2026:25237","tags":["advisory"]},{"url":"https://errata.rockylinux.org/RLSA-2026:25239","tags":["advisory"]},{"url":"https://www.suse.com/support/update/announcement/2026/suse-su-202622251-1/","tags":["advisory"]},{"url":"https://bugzilla.suse.com/1259652","tags":["report"]},{"url":"https://bugzilla.suse.com/1266340","tags":["report"]},{"url":"https://bugzilla.suse.com/1266341","tags":["report"]},{"url":"https://bugzilla.suse.com/1266342","tags":["report"]},{"url":"https://bugzilla.suse.com/1266344","tags":["report"]},{"url":"https://bugzilla.suse.com/1266345","tags":["report"]},{"url":"https://bugzilla.suse.com/1266347","tags":["report"]},{"url":"https://bugzilla.suse.com/1266349","tags":["report"]},{"url":"https://bugzilla.suse.com/1266350","tags":["report"]},{"url":"https://bugzilla.suse.com/1266351","tags":["report"]},{"url":"https://bugzilla.suse.com/1266352","tags":["report"]},{"url":"https://bugzilla.suse.com/1266353","tags":["report"]},{"url":"https://bugzilla.suse.com/1266355","tags":["report"]},{"url":"https://bugzilla.suse.com/1266356","tags":["report"]},{"url":"https://bugzilla.suse.com/1266357","tags":["report"]},{"url":"https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-2673","tags":["web"]},{"url":"https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-34180","tags":["web"]},{"url":"https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-34182","tags":["web"]},{"url":"https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-34183","tags":["web"]},{"url":"https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-42764","tags":["web"]},{"url":"https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-42766","tags":["web"]},{"url":"https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-42767","tags":["web"]},{"url":"https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-42768","tags":["web"]},{"url":"https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-42769","tags":["web"]},{"url":"https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-42770","tags":["web"]},{"url":"https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-45445","tags":["web"]},{"url":"https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-45446","tags":["web"]},{"url":"https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-45447","tags":["web"]},{"url":"https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-7383","tags":["web"]},{"url":"https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-9076","tags":["web"]},{"url":"https://www.suse.com/support/update/announcement/2026/suse-su-202622315-1/","tags":["advisory"]},{"url":"https://www.suse.com/support/update/announcement/2026/suse-su-20262648-1/","tags":["advisory"]},{"url":"https://bugzilla.suse.com/1266343","tags":["report"]},{"url":"https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-34181","tags":["web"]},{"url":"https://ubuntu.com/security/CVE-2026-42769","tags":["report"]},{"url":"","tags":["advisory"]}],"sources":{"cve":[{"id":"CVE-2026-42769","title":"Trust-Anchor Substitution via cert/issuer Typo in CMP rootCaKeyUpdate","description":"Issue Summary: An error in the callback used to verify the certificate\nprovided in a Root CA key update Certificate Management Protocol (CMP)\nmessage response rendered the certificate validation ineffectual, which\ncould lead to escalation of credentials from the Registration Authority (RA)\nlevel to the root Certification Authority (root CA) level.\n\nImpact Summary: The Registration Autority could replace the root CA\ncertificate for the CMP clients with an arbitrary root CA certificate.\n\nOne of the parts of the Certificate Management Protocol (CMP), specified in\nRFC 9810, is Root Certification Authority (root CA) key Rollover,\nwhich is sent by the server in a message with type 'id-it-rootCaKeyUpdate'.\nAs part of these messages, 'newWithOld' certificate, the new root CA\ncertificate signed with the old root CA key, is provided, and verifying its\nsignature is crucial for transferring the trust from the old CA key to the\nnew one.\n\nThe 'id-it-rootCaKeyUpdate' messages are expected to be processed with\nOSSL_CMP_get1_rootCaKeyUpdate(), that is expected to verify the 'newWithOld'\ncertificate.  A typo in the certificate chain building code led to adding\nan incorrect certificate ('newWithOld' instead of 'oldRoot') to the\ncertificate chain, rendering the certificate verification process ineffectual\n(only the issuer name and the algorithm OIDs were verified by other parts\nof the verification code).\n\nAn attacker who already has credentials that satisfy the CMP message\nprotection checks can generate a new key pair and use a crafted self-signed\ncertificate in its 'id-it-rootCaKeyUpdate' CMP messages which affected CMP\nclients would accept as a new trust anchor.\n\nSignificant preconditions for the attack (having valid RA-level credentials)\nare the reason the issue was assigned Low severity.\n\nThe FIPS modules are not affected by this issue, as the affected code is\noutside the OpenSSL FIPS module boundary.","status":"published","published":"2026-06-09T16:03:28.999Z","modified":"2026-06-10T07:48:06.084Z","cvss":[{"version":"3.1","score":5.3,"vector":"CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N","level":"medium","assessor":"adp"}],"cwes":["CWE-295"],"updated_at":"2026-11-02T13:40:35.004553Z"}],"euvd":[{"id":"EUVD-2026-35486","description":"Issue Summary: An error in the callback used to verify the certificate\nprovided in a Root CA key update Certificate Management Protocol (CMP)\nmessage response rendered the certificate validation ineffectual, which\ncould lead to escalation of credentials from the Registration Authority (RA)\nlevel to the root Certification Authority (root CA) level.\n\nImpact Summary: The Registration Autority could replace the root CA\ncertificate for the CMP clients with an arbitrary root CA certificate.\n\nOne of the parts of the Certificate Management Protocol (CMP), specified in\nRFC 9810, is Root Certification Authority (root CA) key Rollover,\nwhich is sent by the server in a message with type 'id-it-rootCaKeyUpdate'.\nAs part of these messages, 'newWithOld' certificate, the new root CA\ncertificate signed with the old root CA key, is provided, and verifying its\nsignature is crucial for transferring the trust from the old CA key to the\nnew one.\n\nThe 'id-it-rootCaKeyUpdate' messages are expected to be processed with\nOSSL_CMP_get1_rootCaKeyUpdate(), that is expected to verify the 'newWithOld'\ncertificate.  A typo in the certificate chain building code led to adding\nan incorrect certificate ('newWithOld' instead of 'oldRoot') to the\ncertificate chain, rendering the certificate verification process ineffectual\n(only the issuer name and the algorithm OIDs were verified by other parts\nof the verification code).\n\nAn attacker who already has credentials that satisfy the CMP message\nprotection checks can generate a new key pair and use a crafted self-signed\ncertificate in its 'id-it-rootCaKeyUpdate' CMP messages which affected CMP\nclients would accept as a new trust anchor.\n\nSignificant preconditions for the attack (having valid RA-level credentials)\nare the reason the issue was assigned Low severity.\n\nThe FIPS modules are not affected by this issue, as the affected code is\noutside the OpenSSL FIPS module boundary.","status":"published","published":"2026-06-09T16:03:28Z","modified":"2026-06-10T07:48:06Z","cvss":[{"version":"3.1","score":5.3,"vector":"CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N","level":"medium"}],"updated_at":"2026-11-02T18:20:45.803611Z"}],"ghsa":[{"id":"GHSA-rpj2-p5pj-r33v","title":"Issue Summary: An error in the callback used to verify the certificate\nprovided in a Root CA key...","description":"Issue Summary: An error in the callback used to verify the certificate\nprovided in a Root CA key update Certificate Management Protocol (CMP)\nmessage response rendered the certificate validation ineffectual, which\ncould lead to escalation of credentials from the Registration Authority (RA)\nlevel to the root Certification Authority (root CA) level.\n\nImpact Summary: The Registration Autority could replace the root CA\ncertificate for the CMP clients with an arbitrary root CA certificate.\n\nOne of the parts of the Certificate Management Protocol (CMP), specified in\nRFC 9810, is Root Certification Authority (root CA) key Rollover,\nwhich is sent by the server in a message with type 'id-it-rootCaKeyUpdate'.\nAs part of these messages, 'newWithOld' certificate, the new root CA\ncertificate signed with the old root CA key, is provided, and verifying its\nsignature is crucial for transferring the trust from the old CA key to the\nnew one.\n\nThe 'id-it-rootCaKeyUpdate' messages are expected to be processed with\nOSSL_CMP_get1_rootCaKeyUpdate(), that is expected to verify the 'newWithOld'\ncertificate.  A typo in the certificate chain building code led to adding\nan incorrect certificate ('newWithOld' instead of 'oldRoot') to the\ncertificate chain, rendering the certificate verification process ineffectual\n(only the issuer name and the algorithm OIDs were verified by other parts\nof the verification code).\n\nAn attacker who already has credentials that satisfy the CMP message\nprotection checks can generate a new key pair and use a crafted self-signed\ncertificate in its 'id-it-rootCaKeyUpdate' CMP messages which affected CMP\nclients would accept as a new trust anchor.\n\nSignificant preconditions for the attack (having valid RA-level credentials)\nare the reason the issue was assigned Low severity.\n\nThe FIPS modules are not affected by this issue, as the affected code is\noutside the OpenSSL FIPS module boundary.","status":"published","published":"2026-06-09T18:30:43Z","modified":"2026-06-10T09:32:58Z","cvss":[{"version":"3.1","score":5.3,"vector":"CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N","level":"medium"}],"cwes":["CWE-295"],"updated_at":"2026-11-02T15:08:43.417477Z"}],"nvd":[{"id":"CVE-2026-42769","description":"Issue Summary: An error in the callback used to verify the certificate\nprovided in a Root CA key update Certificate Management Protocol (CMP)\nmessage response rendered the certificate validation ineffectual, which\ncould lead to escalation of credentials from the Registration Authority (RA)\nlevel to the root Certification Authority (root CA) level.\n\nImpact Summary: The Registration Autority could replace the root CA\ncertificate for the CMP clients with an arbitrary root CA certificate.\n\nOne of the parts of the Certificate Management Protocol (CMP), specified in\nRFC 9810, is Root Certification Authority (root CA) key Rollover,\nwhich is sent by the server in a message with type 'id-it-rootCaKeyUpdate'.\nAs part of these messages, 'newWithOld' certificate, the new root CA\ncertificate signed with the old root CA key, is provided, and verifying its\nsignature is crucial for transferring the trust from the old CA key to the\nnew one.\n\nThe 'id-it-rootCaKeyUpdate' messages are expected to be processed with\nOSSL_CMP_get1_rootCaKeyUpdate(), that is expected to verify the 'newWithOld'\ncertificate.  A typo in the certificate chain building code led to adding\nan incorrect certificate ('newWithOld' instead of 'oldRoot') to the\ncertificate chain, rendering the certificate verification process ineffectual\n(only the issuer name and the algorithm OIDs were verified by other parts\nof the verification code).\n\nAn attacker who already has credentials that satisfy the CMP message\nprotection checks can generate a new key pair and use a crafted self-signed\ncertificate in its 'id-it-rootCaKeyUpdate' CMP messages which affected CMP\nclients would accept as a new trust anchor.\n\nSignificant preconditions for the attack (having valid RA-level credentials)\nare the reason the issue was assigned Low severity.\n\nThe FIPS modules are not affected by this issue, as the affected code is\noutside the OpenSSL FIPS module boundary.","status":"published","published":"2026-06-09T17:17:08.377Z","modified":"2026-07-23T08:10:00.137Z","cvss":[{"version":"3.1","score":5.3,"vector":"CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N","level":"medium","assessor":"secondary"}],"cwes":["CWE-295"],"updated_at":"2026-11-02T14:12:23.109705Z"}],"osv":[{"id":"ALPINE-CVE-2026-42769","description":"Issue Summary: An error in the callback used to verify the certificate\nprovided in a Root CA key update Certificate Management Protocol (CMP)\nmessage response rendered the certificate validation ineffectual, which\ncould lead to escalation of credentials from the Registration Authority (RA)\nlevel to the root Certification Authority (root CA) level.\n\nImpact Summary: The Registration Autority could replace the root CA\ncertificate for the CMP clients with an arbitrary root CA certificate.\n\nOne of the parts of the Certificate Management Protocol (CMP), specified in\nRFC 9810, is Root Certification Authority (root CA) key Rollover,\nwhich is sent by the server in a message with type 'id-it-rootCaKeyUpdate'.\nAs part of these messages, 'newWithOld' certificate, the new root CA\ncertificate signed with the old root CA key, is provided, and verifying its\nsignature is crucial for transferring the trust from the old CA key to the\nnew one.\n\nThe 'id-it-rootCaKeyUpdate' messages are expected to be processed with\nOSSL_CMP_get1_rootCaKeyUpdate(), that is expected to verify the 'newWithOld'\ncertificate.  A typo in the certificate chain building code led to adding\nan incorrect certificate ('newWithOld' instead of 'oldRoot') to the\ncertificate chain, rendering the certificate verification process ineffectual\n(only the issuer name and the algorithm OIDs were verified by other parts\nof the verification code).\n\nAn attacker who already has credentials that satisfy the CMP message\nprotection checks can generate a new key pair and use a crafted self-signed\ncertificate in its 'id-it-rootCaKeyUpdate' CMP messages which affected CMP\nclients would accept as a new trust anchor.\n\nSignificant preconditions for the attack (having valid RA-level credentials)\nare the reason the issue was assigned Low severity.\n\nThe FIPS modules are not affected by this issue, as the affected code is\noutside the OpenSSL FIPS module boundary.","status":"published","published":"2026-06-09T17:17:08.377Z","modified":"2026-10-01T02:17:49.297679357Z","cvss":[{"version":"3.1","score":5.3,"vector":"CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N","level":"medium"}],"updated_at":"2026-11-02T15:27:50.764331Z"},{"id":"BELL-CVE-2026-42769","status":"published","published":"2026-06-10T13:01:32.111747Z","modified":"2026-06-11T07:15:07.631740033Z","cvss":[{"version":"3.1","score":5.3,"vector":"CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N","level":"medium"}],"updated_at":"2026-11-02T15:28:23.844435Z"},{"id":"CVE-2026-42769","title":"Trust-Anchor Substitution via cert/issuer Typo in CMP rootCaKeyUpdate","description":"Issue Summary: An error in the callback used to verify the certificate\nprovided in a Root CA key update Certificate Management Protocol (CMP)\nmessage response rendered the certificate validation ineffectual, which\ncould lead to escalation of credentials from the Registration Authority (RA)\nlevel to the root Certification Authority (root CA) level.\n\nImpact Summary: The Registration Autority could replace the root CA\ncertificate for the CMP clients with an arbitrary root CA certificate.\n\nOne of the parts of the Certificate Management Protocol (CMP), specified in\nRFC 9810, is Root Certification Authority (root CA) key Rollover,\nwhich is sent by the server in a message with type 'id-it-rootCaKeyUpdate'.\nAs part of these messages, 'newWithOld' certificate, the new root CA\ncertificate signed with the old root CA key, is provided, and verifying its\nsignature is crucial for transferring the trust from the old CA key to the\nnew one.\n\nThe 'id-it-rootCaKeyUpdate' messages are expected to be processed with\nOSSL_CMP_get1_rootCaKeyUpdate(), that is expected to verify the 'newWithOld'\ncertificate.  A typo in the certificate chain building code led to adding\nan incorrect certificate ('newWithOld' instead of 'oldRoot') to the\ncertificate chain, rendering the certificate verification process ineffectual\n(only the issuer name and the algorithm OIDs were verified by other parts\nof the verification code).\n\nAn attacker who already has credentials that satisfy the CMP message\nprotection checks can generate a new key pair and use a crafted self-signed\ncertificate in its 'id-it-rootCaKeyUpdate' CMP messages which affected CMP\nclients would accept as a new trust anchor.\n\nSignificant preconditions for the attack (having valid RA-level credentials)\nare the reason the issue was assigned Low severity.\n\nThe FIPS modules are not affected by this issue, as the affected code is\noutside the OpenSSL FIPS module boundary.","status":"published","published":"2026-06-09T16:03:28.999Z","modified":"2026-10-28T11:13:32.581283561Z","cvss":[{"version":"3.1","score":5.3,"vector":"CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N","level":"medium"}],"cwes":["CWE-295"],"updated_at":"2026-11-02T15:45:04.117819Z"},{"id":"DEBIAN-CVE-2026-42769","description":"Issue Summary: An error in the callback used to verify the certificate provided in a Root CA key update Certificate Management Protocol (CMP) message response rendered the certificate validation ineffectual, which could lead to escalation of credentials from the Registration Authority (RA) level to the root Certification Authority (root CA) level.  Impact Summary: The Registration Autority could replace the root CA certificate for the CMP clients with an arbitrary root CA certificate.  One of the parts of the Certificate Management Protocol (CMP), specified in RFC 9810, is Root Certification Authority (root CA) key Rollover, which is sent by the server in a message with type 'id-it-rootCaKeyUpdate'. As part of these messages, 'newWithOld' certificate, the new root CA certificate signed with the old root CA key, is provided, and verifying its signature is crucial for transferring the trust from the old CA key to the new one.  The 'id-it-rootCaKeyUpdate' messages are expected to be processed with OSSL_CMP_get1_rootCaKeyUpdate(), that is expected to verify the 'newWithOld' certificate.  A typo in the certificate chain building code led to adding an incorrect certificate ('newWithOld' instead of 'oldRoot') to the certificate chain, rendering the certificate verification process ineffectual (only the issuer name and the algorithm OIDs were verified by other parts of the verification code).  An attacker who already has credentials that satisfy the CMP message protection checks can generate a new key pair and use a crafted self-signed certificate in its 'id-it-rootCaKeyUpdate' CMP messages which affected CMP clients would accept as a new trust anchor.  Significant preconditions for the attack (having valid RA-level credentials) are the reason the issue was assigned Low severity.  The FIPS modules are not affected by this issue, as the affected code is outside the OpenSSL FIPS module boundary.","status":"published","published":"2026-06-09T17:17:08.377Z","modified":"2026-10-01T03:03:22.98805592Z","cvss":[{"version":"3.1","score":5.3,"vector":"CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N","level":"medium"}],"updated_at":"2026-11-02T15:45:55.251751Z"},{"id":"JLSEC-2026-1141","title":"Issue Summary: An error in the callback used to verify the certificate provided in a Root CA key...","description":"Issue Summary: An error in the callback used to verify the certificate\nprovided in a Root CA key update Certificate Management Protocol (CMP)\nmessage response rendered the certificate validation ineffectual, which\ncould lead to escalation of credentials from the Registration Authority (RA)\nlevel to the root Certification Authority (root CA) level.\n\nImpact Summary: The Registration Autority could replace the root CA\ncertificate for the CMP clients with an arbitrary root CA certificate.\n\nOne of the parts of the Certificate Management Protocol (CMP), specified in\nRFC 9810, is Root Certification Authority (root CA) key Rollover,\nwhich is sent by the server in a message with type 'id-it-rootCaKeyUpdate'.\nAs part of these messages, 'newWithOld' certificate, the new root CA\ncertificate signed with the old root CA key, is provided, and verifying its\nsignature is crucial for transferring the trust from the old CA key to the\nnew one.\n\nThe 'id-it-rootCaKeyUpdate' messages are expected to be processed with\n`OSSL_CMP_get1_rootCaKeyUpdate()`, that is expected to verify the 'newWithOld'\ncertificate.  A typo in the certificate chain building code led to adding\nan incorrect certificate ('newWithOld' instead of 'oldRoot') to the\ncertificate chain, rendering the certificate verification process ineffectual\n(only the issuer name and the algorithm OIDs were verified by other parts\nof the verification code).\n\nAn attacker who already has credentials that satisfy the CMP message\nprotection checks can generate a new key pair and use a crafted self-signed\ncertificate in its 'id-it-rootCaKeyUpdate' CMP messages which affected CMP\nclients would accept as a new trust anchor.\n\nSignificant preconditions for the attack (having valid RA-level credentials)\nare the reason the issue was assigned Low severity.\n\nThe FIPS modules are not affected by this issue, as the affected code is\noutside the OpenSSL FIPS module boundary.","status":"published","published":"2026-08-03T19:08:57.739Z","modified":"2026-08-13T13:00:04.851557367Z","cvss":[{"version":"3.1","score":5.3,"vector":"CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N","level":"medium"}],"updated_at":"2026-11-02T15:47:18.159338Z"},{"id":"RHSA-2026:25237","title":"Red Hat Security Advisory: openssl security update","status":"published","published":"2026-06-12T10:07:07Z","modified":"2026-10-20T10:06:34Z","cvss":[{"version":"3.1","score":9.1,"vector":"CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N","level":"critical"}],"updated_at":"2026-11-02T15:53:19.449341Z"},{"id":"RHSA-2026:25239","title":"Red Hat Security Advisory: openssl security update","status":"published","published":"2026-06-12T10:07:08Z","modified":"2026-10-20T10:06:35Z","cvss":[{"version":"3.1","score":9.1,"vector":"CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N","level":"critical"}],"updated_at":"2026-11-02T15:53:19.449341Z"},{"id":"RHSA-2026:42825","title":"Red Hat Security Advisory: Red Hat Hardened Images RPMs bug fix and enhancement update","status":"published","published":"2026-08-29T10:05:47Z","modified":"2026-10-20T10:09:07Z","cvss":[{"version":"3.1","score":9.1,"vector":"CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N","level":"critical"}],"updated_at":"2026-11-02T15:53:20.491441Z"},{"id":"RHSA-2026:55543","title":"Red Hat Security Advisory: Red Hat Hardened Images RPMs bug fix and enhancement update","status":"published","published":"2026-08-29T10:06:17Z","modified":"2026-10-20T10:11:20Z","cvss":[{"version":"3.1","score":9.1,"vector":"CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N","level":"critical"}],"updated_at":"2026-11-02T15:53:21.457353Z"},{"id":"RHSA-2026:59635","title":"Red Hat Security Advisory: Red Hat Hardened Images RPMs bug fix and enhancement update","status":"published","published":"2026-08-27T10:15:54Z","modified":"2026-10-20T10:12:09Z","cvss":[{"version":"3.1","score":9.1,"vector":"CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N","level":"critical"}],"updated_at":"2026-11-02T15:53:21.91255Z"},{"id":"RHSA-2026:59641","title":"Red Hat Security Advisory: Red Hat Hardened Images RPMs bug fix and enhancement update","status":"published","published":"2026-08-27T10:15:54Z","modified":"2026-10-20T10:12:09Z","cvss":[{"version":"3.1","score":9.1,"vector":"CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N","level":"critical"}],"updated_at":"2026-11-02T15:53:21.91255Z"},{"id":"RHSA-2026:62562","title":"Red Hat Security Advisory: Red Hat Hardened Images RPMs Security Update","status":"published","published":"2026-09-03T10:14:27Z","modified":"2026-10-20T10:12:39Z","cvss":[{"version":"3.1","score":9.1,"vector":"CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N","level":"critical"}],"updated_at":"2026-11-02T15:53:21.91255Z"},{"id":"RHSA-2026:62563","title":"Red Hat Security Advisory: Red Hat Hardened Images RPMs Security Update","status":"published","published":"2026-09-03T10:14:28Z","modified":"2026-10-20T10:12:39Z","cvss":[{"version":"3.1","score":9.1,"vector":"CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N","level":"critical"}],"updated_at":"2026-11-02T15:53:21.91255Z"},{"id":"RHSA-2026:62790","title":"Red Hat Security Advisory: Red Hat Hardened Images RPMs bug fix and enhancement update","status":"published","published":"2026-09-22T10:17:08Z","modified":"2026-10-20T10:12:46Z","cvss":[{"version":"3.1","score":9.1,"vector":"CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N","level":"critical"}],"updated_at":"2026-11-02T15:53:21.91255Z"},{"id":"RHSA-2026:67551","title":"Red Hat Security Advisory: Red Hat Hardened Images RPMs bug fix and enhancement update","status":"published","published":"2026-09-22T10:18:42Z","modified":"2026-10-20T10:13:58Z","cvss":[{"version":"3.1","score":9.1,"vector":"CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N","level":"critical"}],"updated_at":"2026-11-02T15:53:22.406388Z"},{"id":"RLSA-2026:25237","title":"Important: openssl security update","description":"OpenSSL is a toolkit that implements the Secure Sockets Layer (SSL) and Transport Layer Security (TLS) protocols, as well as a full-strength general-purpose cryptography library.\n\nSecurity Fix(es):\n\n* openssl: OpenSSL: Heap buffer overflow due to signed integer overflow in Unicode output sizing (CVE-2026-7383)\n\n* openssl: OpenSSL: Denial of Service due to heap out-of-bounds read in CMS password-based decryption (CVE-2026-9076)\n\n* openssl: OpenSSL: Heap buffer over-read in ASN.1 decoding can lead to denial of service or information disclosure. (CVE-2026-34180)\n\n* openssl: PKCS#12 Files with PBMAC1 Are Accepted with Short HMAC Keys (CVE-2026-34181)\n\n* openssl: CMS AuthEnvelopedData Processing May Accept Forged Messages (CVE-2026-34182)\n\n* openssl: Unbounded Memory Growth in the QUIC PATH_CHALLENGE Handler (CVE-2026-34183)\n\n* openssl: NULL pointer dereference in QUIC server initial packet handling (CVE-2026-42764)\n\n* openssl: Possible NULL Dereference in Password-Based CMS Decryption (CVE-2026-42766)\n\n* openssl: NULL Pointer Dereference in CRMF EncryptedValue Decryption (CVE-2026-42767)\n\n* openssl: Multi-RecipientInfo Bleichenbacher Oracle in CMS_decrypt() and PKCS7_decrypt() (CVE-2026-42768)\n\n* openssl: Trust-Anchor Substitution via cert/issuer Typo in CMP rootCaKeyUpdate (CVE-2026-42769)\n\n* openssl: FFC-DH Peer Validation Uses Attacker-Supplied q (CVE-2026-42770)\n\n* openssl: AES-OCB IV Ignored on EVP_Cipher() Path (CVE-2026-45445)\n\n* openssl: Incorrect Tag Processing for Empty Messages in AES-GCM-SIV and AES-SIV modes (CVE-2026-45446)\n\n* openssl: Heap Use-After-Free in OpenSSL PKCS7_verify() (CVE-2026-45447)\n\nFor more details about the security issue(s), including the impact, a CVSS score, acknowledgments, and other related information, refer to the CVE page(s) listed in the References section.","status":"published","published":"2026-06-13T00:05:06.020189Z","modified":"2026-06-13T00:30:05.753476822Z","cvss":[{"version":"3.1","score":9.1,"vector":"CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N","level":"critical"}],"updated_at":"2026-11-02T15:53:25.804165Z"},{"id":"RLSA-2026:25239","title":"Important: openssl security update","description":"OpenSSL is a toolkit that implements the Secure Sockets Layer (SSL) and Transport Layer Security (TLS) protocols, as well as a full-strength general-purpose cryptography library.\n\nSecurity Fix(es):\n\n* openssl: OpenSSL: Heap buffer overflow due to signed integer overflow in Unicode output sizing (CVE-2026-7383)\n\n* openssl: OpenSSL: Denial of Service due to heap out-of-bounds read in CMS password-based decryption (CVE-2026-9076)\n\n* openssl: OpenSSL: Heap buffer over-read in ASN.1 decoding can lead to denial of service or information disclosure. (CVE-2026-34180)\n\n* openssl: PKCS#12 Files with PBMAC1 Are Accepted with Short HMAC Keys (CVE-2026-34181)\n\n* openssl: CMS AuthEnvelopedData Processing May Accept Forged Messages (CVE-2026-34182)\n\n* openssl: Unbounded Memory Growth in the QUIC PATH_CHALLENGE Handler (CVE-2026-34183)\n\n* openssl: NULL pointer dereference in QUIC server initial packet handling (CVE-2026-42764)\n\n* openssl: Possible NULL Dereference in Password-Based CMS Decryption (CVE-2026-42766)\n\n* openssl: NULL Pointer Dereference in CRMF EncryptedValue Decryption (CVE-2026-42767)\n\n* openssl: Multi-RecipientInfo Bleichenbacher Oracle in CMS_decrypt() and PKCS7_decrypt() (CVE-2026-42768)\n\n* openssl: Trust-Anchor Substitution via cert/issuer Typo in CMP rootCaKeyUpdate (CVE-2026-42769)\n\n* openssl: FFC-DH Peer Validation Uses Attacker-Supplied q (CVE-2026-42770)\n\n* openssl: AES-OCB IV Ignored on EVP_Cipher() Path (CVE-2026-45445)\n\n* openssl: Incorrect Tag Processing for Empty Messages in AES-GCM-SIV and AES-SIV modes (CVE-2026-45446)\n\n* openssl: Heap Use-After-Free in OpenSSL PKCS7_verify() (CVE-2026-45447)\n\nFor more details about the security issue(s), including the impact, a CVSS score, acknowledgments, and other related information, refer to the CVE page(s) listed in the References section.","status":"published","published":"2026-06-13T00:03:17.085789Z","modified":"2026-06-13T00:30:05.7593994Z","cvss":[{"version":"3.1","score":9.1,"vector":"CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N","level":"critical"}],"updated_at":"2026-11-02T15:53:25.804165Z"},{"id":"UBUNTU-CVE-2026-42769","description":"Issue Summary: An error in the callback used to verify the certificate provided in a Root CA key update Certificate Management Protocol (CMP) message response rendered the certificate validation ineffectual, which could lead to escalation of credentials from the Registration Authority (RA) level to the root Certification Authority (root CA) level. Impact Summary: The Registration Autority could replace the root CA certificate for the CMP clients with an arbitrary root CA certificate. One of the parts of the Certificate Management Protocol (CMP), specified in RFC 9810, is Root Certification Authority (root CA) key Rollover, which is sent by the server in a message with type 'id-it-rootCaKeyUpdate'. As part of these messages, 'newWithOld' certificate, the new root CA certificate signed with the old root CA key, is provided, and verifying its signature is crucial for transferring the trust from the old CA key to the new one. The 'id-it-rootCaKeyUpdate' messages are expected to be processed with OSSL_CMP_get1_rootCaKeyUpdate(), that is expected to verify the 'newWithOld' certificate.  A typo in the certificate chain building code led to adding an incorrect certificate ('newWithOld' instead of 'oldRoot') to the certificate chain, rendering the certificate verification process ineffectual (only the issuer name and the algorithm OIDs were verified by other parts of the verification code). An attacker who already has credentials that satisfy the CMP message protection checks can generate a new key pair and use a crafted self-signed certificate in its 'id-it-rootCaKeyUpdate' CMP messages which affected CMP clients would accept as a new trust anchor. Significant preconditions for the attack (having valid RA-level credentials) are the reason the issue was assigned Low severity. The FIPS modules are not affected by this issue, as the affected code is outside the OpenSSL FIPS module boundary.","status":"published","published":"2026-06-09T00:00:00Z","modified":"2026-10-17T12:58:17.095720305Z","cvss":[{"version":"3.1","score":5.3,"vector":"CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N","level":"medium"}],"updated_at":"2026-11-02T16:56:18.393417Z"},{"id":"ALSA-2026:25237","title":"Important: openssl security update","description":"OpenSSL is a toolkit that implements the Secure Sockets Layer (SSL) and Transport Layer Security (TLS) protocols, as well as a full-strength general-purpose cryptography library.  \n\nSecurity Fix(es):  \n\n  * openssl: OpenSSL: Heap buffer overflow due to signed integer overflow in Unicode output sizing (CVE-2026-7383)\n  * openssl: OpenSSL: Denial of Service due to heap out-of-bounds read in CMS password-based decryption (CVE-2026-9076)\n  * openssl: OpenSSL: Heap buffer over-read in ASN.1 decoding can lead to denial of service or information disclosure. (CVE-2026-34180)\n  * openssl: PKCS#12 Files with PBMAC1 Are Accepted with Short HMAC Keys (CVE-2026-34181)\n  * openssl: CMS AuthEnvelopedData Processing May Accept Forged Messages (CVE-2026-34182)\n  * openssl: Unbounded Memory Growth in the QUIC PATH_CHALLENGE Handler (CVE-2026-34183)\n  * openssl: NULL pointer dereference in QUIC server initial packet handling (CVE-2026-42764)\n  * openssl: Possible NULL Dereference in Password-Based CMS Decryption (CVE-2026-42766)\n  * openssl: NULL Pointer Dereference in CRMF EncryptedValue Decryption (CVE-2026-42767)\n  * openssl: Multi-RecipientInfo Bleichenbacher Oracle in CMS_decrypt() and PKCS7_decrypt() (CVE-2026-42768)\n  * openssl: Trust-Anchor Substitution via cert/issuer Typo in CMP rootCaKeyUpdate (CVE-2026-42769)\n  * openssl: FFC-DH Peer Validation Uses Attacker-Supplied q (CVE-2026-42770)\n  * openssl: AES-OCB IV Ignored on EVP_Cipher() Path (CVE-2026-45445)\n  * openssl: Incorrect Tag Processing for Empty Messages in AES-GCM-SIV and AES-SIV modes (CVE-2026-45446)\n  * openssl: Heap Use-After-Free in OpenSSL PKCS7_verify() (CVE-2026-45447)\n\n\nFor more details about the security issue(s), including the impact, a CVSS score, acknowledgments, and other related information, refer to the CVE page(s) listed in the References section.\n","status":"published","published":"2026-06-11T00:00:00Z","modified":"2026-10-29T11:30:19.406512767Z","updated_at":"2026-11-02T15:27:54.283654Z"},{"id":"ALSA-2026:25239","title":"Important: openssl security update","description":"OpenSSL is a toolkit that implements the Secure Sockets Layer (SSL) and Transport Layer Security (TLS) protocols, as well as a full-strength general-purpose cryptography library.  \n\nSecurity Fix(es):  \n\n  * openssl: OpenSSL: Heap buffer overflow due to signed integer overflow in Unicode output sizing (CVE-2026-7383)\n  * openssl: OpenSSL: Denial of Service due to heap out-of-bounds read in CMS password-based decryption (CVE-2026-9076)\n  * openssl: OpenSSL: Heap buffer over-read in ASN.1 decoding can lead to denial of service or information disclosure. (CVE-2026-34180)\n  * openssl: PKCS#12 Files with PBMAC1 Are Accepted with Short HMAC Keys (CVE-2026-34181)\n  * openssl: CMS AuthEnvelopedData Processing May Accept Forged Messages (CVE-2026-34182)\n  * openssl: Unbounded Memory Growth in the QUIC PATH_CHALLENGE Handler (CVE-2026-34183)\n  * openssl: NULL pointer dereference in QUIC server initial packet handling (CVE-2026-42764)\n  * openssl: Possible NULL Dereference in Password-Based CMS Decryption (CVE-2026-42766)\n  * openssl: NULL Pointer Dereference in CRMF EncryptedValue Decryption (CVE-2026-42767)\n  * openssl: Multi-RecipientInfo Bleichenbacher Oracle in CMS_decrypt() and PKCS7_decrypt() (CVE-2026-42768)\n  * openssl: Trust-Anchor Substitution via cert/issuer Typo in CMP rootCaKeyUpdate (CVE-2026-42769)\n  * openssl: FFC-DH Peer Validation Uses Attacker-Supplied q (CVE-2026-42770)\n  * openssl: AES-OCB IV Ignored on EVP_Cipher() Path (CVE-2026-45445)\n  * openssl: Incorrect Tag Processing for Empty Messages in AES-GCM-SIV and AES-SIV modes (CVE-2026-45446)\n  * openssl: Heap Use-After-Free in OpenSSL PKCS7_verify() (CVE-2026-45447)\n\n\nFor more details about the security issue(s), including the impact, a CVSS score, acknowledgments, and other related information, refer to the CVE page(s) listed in the References section.\n","status":"published","published":"2026-06-11T00:00:00Z","modified":"2026-10-29T11:32:34.006971149Z","updated_at":"2026-11-02T15:27:54.283654Z"},{"id":"AZL-92840","title":"CVE-2026-42769 affecting package openssl for versions less than 3.3.7-4","description":"Issue Summary: An error in the callback used to verify the certificate\nprovided in a Root CA key update Certificate Management Protocol (CMP)\nmessage response rendered the certificate validation ineffectual, which\ncould lead to escalation of credentials from the Registration Authority (RA)\nlevel to the root Certification Authority (root CA) level.\n\nImpact Summary: The Registration Autority could replace the root CA\ncertificate for the CMP clients with an arbitrary root CA certificate.\n\nOne of the parts of the Certificate Management Protocol (CMP), specified in\nRFC 9810, is Root Certification Authority (root CA) key Rollover,\nwhich is sent by the server in a message with type 'id-it-rootCaKeyUpdate'.\nAs part of these messages, 'newWithOld' certificate, the new root CA\ncertificate signed with the old root CA key, is provided, and verifying its\nsignature is crucial for transferring the trust from the old CA key to the\nnew one.\n\nThe 'id-it-rootCaKeyUpdate' messages are expected to be processed with\nOSSL_CMP_get1_rootCaKeyUpdate(), that is expected to verify the 'newWithOld'\ncertificate.  A typo in the certificate chain building code led to adding\nan incorrect certificate ('newWithOld' instead of 'oldRoot') to the\ncertificate chain, rendering the certificate verification process ineffectual\n(only the issuer name and the algorithm OIDs were verified by other parts\nof the verification code).\n\nAn attacker who already has credentials that satisfy the CMP message\nprotection checks can generate a new key pair and use a crafted self-signed\ncertificate in its 'id-it-rootCaKeyUpdate' CMP messages which affected CMP\nclients would accept as a new trust anchor.\n\nSignificant preconditions for the attack (having valid RA-level credentials)\nare the reason the issue was assigned Low severity.\n\nThe FIPS modules are not affected by this issue, as the affected code is\noutside the OpenSSL FIPS module boundary.","status":"published","published":"2026-06-09T17:17:08Z","modified":"2026-08-28T17:56:33.337621Z","updated_at":"2026-11-02T15:28:11.723718Z"},{"id":"CLSA-2026-1782386492","title":"openssl: Fix of 13 CVEs","description":"- CVE-2026-42769: fix CMP rootCaKeyUpdate trust-anchor substitution by adding\n  the correct issuer to the chain, enabling self-signed signature checking,\n  and guarding a NULL verify-param dereference","status":"published","published":"2026-06-25T11:22:03Z","modified":"2026-10-26T09:31:09.731619234Z","updated_at":"2026-11-02T15:43:45.794021Z"},{"id":"MGASA-2026-0253","title":"Updated openssl packages fix security vulnerabilities","description":"The updated packages fix security vulnerabilities:\nPossible Heap Buffer Overflow in ASN.1 Multibyte String Conversion.\n(CVE-2026-7383)\nOut-of-Bounds Read in CMS Password-Based Decryption. (CVE-2026-9076)\nHeap Buffer Over-read in ASN.1 Content Parsing. (CVE-2026-34180)\nPKCS#12 Files with PBMAC1 Are Accepted with Short HMAC Keys.\n(CVE-2026-34181)\nCMS AuthEnvelopedData Processing May Accept Forged Messages.\n(CVE-2026-34182)\nUnbounded Memory Growth in the QUIC PATH_CHALLENGE Handler.\n(CVE-2026-34183)\nNULL Pointer Dereference in QUIC Server Initial Packet Handling.\n(CVE-2026-42764)\nPossible NULL Dereference in Password-Based CMS Decryption.\n(CVE-2026-42766)\nNULL Pointer Dereference in CRMF EncryptedValue Decryption.\n(CVE-2026-42767)\nMulti-RecipientInfo Bleichenbacher Oracle in CMS_decrypt() and\nPKCS7_decrypt(). (CVE-2026-42768)\nTrust-Anchor Substitution via cert/issuer Typo in CMP rootCaKeyUpdate.\n(CVE-2026-42769)\nFFC-DH Peer Validation Uses Attacker-Supplied q. (CVE-2026-42770)\nAES-OCB IV Ignored on EVP_Cipher() Path. (CVE-2026-45445)\nIncorrect Tag Processing for Empty Messages in AES-GCM-SIV and AES-SIV\nmodes. (CVE-2026-45446)\nHeap Use-After-Free in the PKCS7_verify(). (CVE-2026-45447)\n","status":"published","published":"2026-07-15T17:33:12Z","modified":"2026-07-15T17:49:59.909323566Z","updated_at":"2026-11-02T15:49:43.795591Z"},{"id":"openSUSE-SU-2026:11023-1","title":"libopenssl-3-devel-3.5.3-6.1 on GA media","description":"These are all security issues fixed in the libopenssl-3-devel-3.5.3-6.1 package on the GA media of openSUSE Tumbleweed.","status":"published","published":"2026-06-13T00:00:00Z","modified":"2026-06-14T14:00:07.553225075Z","updated_at":"2026-11-02T16:58:38.95195Z"},{"id":"openSUSE-SU-2026:21005-1","title":"Security update for openssl-3","description":"This update for openssl-3 fixes the following issues\n\n- CVE-2026-2673: TLS 1.3 servers may choose unexpected key agreement group (bsc#1259652).\n- CVE-2026-7383: Possible Heap Buffer Overflow in ASN.1 Multibyte String Conversion (bsc#1266340).\n- CVE-2026-9076: Out-of-Bounds Read in CMS Password-Based Decryption (bsc#1266341).\n- CVE-2026-34180: Heap Buffer Over-read in ASN.1 Content Parsing (bsc#1266342).\n- CVE-2026-34182: CMS AuthEnvelopedData Processing May Accept Forged Messages (bsc#1266344).\n- CVE-2026-34183: Unbounded Memory Growth in the QUIC PATH_CHALLENGE Handler (bsc#1266345).\n- CVE-2026-42764: NULL pointer dereference in QUIC server initial packet handling (bsc#1266347).\n- CVE-2026-42766: Possible NULL Dereference in Password-Based CMS Decryption (bsc#1266349).\n- CVE-2026-42767: NULL Pointer Dereference in CRMF EncryptedValue Decryption (bsc#1266350).\n- CVE-2026-42768: Multi-RecipientInfo Bleichenbacher Oracle in CMS_decrypt() and PKCS7_decrypt() (bsc#1266351).\n- CVE-2026-42769: Trust-Anchor Substitution via cert/issuer Typo in CMP rootCaKeyUpdate (bsc#1266352).\n- CVE-2026-42770: FFC-DH Peer Validation Uses Attacker-Supplied q (bsc#1266353).\n- CVE-2026-45445: AES-OCB IV Ignored on EVP_Cipher() Path (bsc#1266355).\n- CVE-2026-45446: Incorrect Tag Processing for Empty Messages in AES-GCM-SIV and AES-SIV modes (bsc#1266356).\n- CVE-2026-45447: Heap Use-After-Free in OpenSSL PKCS7_verify() (bsc#1266357).\n","status":"published","published":"2026-06-22T12:26:17Z","modified":"2026-06-30T18:24:35.407904348Z","updated_at":"2026-11-02T16:58:41.885092Z"},{"id":"SUSE-SU-2026:22251-1","title":"Security update for openssl-3","description":"This update for openssl-3 fixes the following issues\n\n- CVE-2026-2673: TLS 1.3 servers may choose unexpected key agreement group (bsc#1259652).\n- CVE-2026-7383: Possible Heap Buffer Overflow in ASN.1 Multibyte String Conversion (bsc#1266340).\n- CVE-2026-9076: Out-of-Bounds Read in CMS Password-Based Decryption (bsc#1266341).\n- CVE-2026-34180: Heap Buffer Over-read in ASN.1 Content Parsing (bsc#1266342).\n- CVE-2026-34182: CMS AuthEnvelopedData Processing May Accept Forged Messages (bsc#1266344).\n- CVE-2026-34183: Unbounded Memory Growth in the QUIC PATH_CHALLENGE Handler (bsc#1266345).\n- CVE-2026-42764: NULL pointer dereference in QUIC server initial packet handling (bsc#1266347).\n- CVE-2026-42766: Possible NULL Dereference in Password-Based CMS Decryption (bsc#1266349).\n- CVE-2026-42767: NULL Pointer Dereference in CRMF EncryptedValue Decryption (bsc#1266350).\n- CVE-2026-42768: Multi-RecipientInfo Bleichenbacher Oracle in CMS_decrypt() and PKCS7_decrypt() (bsc#1266351).\n- CVE-2026-42769: Trust-Anchor Substitution via cert/issuer Typo in CMP rootCaKeyUpdate (bsc#1266352).\n- CVE-2026-42770: FFC-DH Peer Validation Uses Attacker-Supplied q (bsc#1266353).\n- CVE-2026-45445: AES-OCB IV Ignored on EVP_Cipher() Path (bsc#1266355).\n- CVE-2026-45446: Incorrect Tag Processing for Empty Messages in AES-GCM-SIV and AES-SIV modes (bsc#1266356).\n- CVE-2026-45447: Heap Use-After-Free in OpenSSL PKCS7_verify() (bsc#1266357).\n","status":"published","published":"2026-06-22T12:23:46Z","modified":"2026-06-30T18:24:26.161789581Z","updated_at":"2026-11-02T15:54:02.654057Z"},{"id":"SUSE-SU-2026:22315-1","title":"Security update for openssl-3","description":"This update for openssl-3 fixes the following issues\n\n- CVE-2026-2673: TLS 1.3 servers may choose unexpected key agreement group (bsc#1259652).\n- CVE-2026-7383: Possible Heap Buffer Overflow in ASN.1 Multibyte String Conversion (bsc#1266340).\n- CVE-2026-9076: Out-of-Bounds Read in CMS Password-Based Decryption (bsc#1266341).\n- CVE-2026-34180: Heap Buffer Over-read in ASN.1 Content Parsing (bsc#1266342).\n- CVE-2026-34182: CMS AuthEnvelopedData Processing May Accept Forged Messages (bsc#1266344).\n- CVE-2026-34183: Unbounded Memory Growth in the QUIC PATH_CHALLENGE Handler (bsc#1266345).\n- CVE-2026-42764: NULL pointer dereference in QUIC server initial packet handling (bsc#1266347).\n- CVE-2026-42766: Possible NULL Dereference in Password-Based CMS Decryption (bsc#1266349).\n- CVE-2026-42767: NULL Pointer Dereference in CRMF EncryptedValue Decryption (bsc#1266350).\n- CVE-2026-42768: Multi-RecipientInfo Bleichenbacher Oracle in CMS_decrypt() and PKCS7_decrypt() (bsc#1266351).\n- CVE-2026-42769: Trust-Anchor Substitution via cert/issuer Typo in CMP rootCaKeyUpdate (bsc#1266352).\n- CVE-2026-42770: FFC-DH Peer Validation Uses Attacker-Supplied q (bsc#1266353).\n- CVE-2026-45445: AES-OCB IV Ignored on EVP_Cipher() Path (bsc#1266355).\n- CVE-2026-45446: Incorrect Tag Processing for Empty Messages in AES-GCM-SIV and AES-SIV modes (bsc#1266356).\n- CVE-2026-45447: Heap Use-After-Free in OpenSSL PKCS7_verify() (bsc#1266357).\n","status":"published","published":"2026-06-22T12:23:46Z","modified":"2026-07-02T18:24:09.732592143Z","updated_at":"2026-11-02T15:54:03.080707Z"},{"id":"SUSE-SU-2026:2648-1","title":"Security update for openssl-3","description":"This update for openssl-3 fixes the following issues\n\n- CVE-2026-7383: Possible Heap Buffer Overflow in ASN.1 Multibyte String Conversion (bsc#1266340).\n- CVE-2026-9076: Out-of-Bounds Read in CMS Password-Based Decryption (bsc#1266341).\n- CVE-2026-34180: Heap Buffer Over-read in ASN.1 Content Parsing (bsc#1266342).\n- CVE-2026-34181: PKCS#12 Files with PBMAC1 Are Accepted with Short HMAC Keys (bsc#1266343).\n- CVE-2026-34183: Unbounded Memory Growth in the QUIC PATH_CHALLENGE Handler (bsc#1266345).\n- CVE-2026-42766: Possible NULL Dereference in Password-Based CMS Decryption (bsc#1266349).\n- CVE-2026-42767: NULL Pointer Dereference in CRMF EncryptedValue Decryption (bsc#1266350).\n- CVE-2026-42768: Multi-RecipientInfo Bleichenbacher Oracle in CMS_decrypt() and PKCS7_decrypt() (bsc#1266351).\n- CVE-2026-42769: Trust-Anchor Substitution via cert/issuer Typo in CMP rootCaKeyUpdate (bsc#1266352).\n- CVE-2026-42770: FFC-DH Peer Validation Uses Attacker-Supplied q (bsc#1266353).\n- CVE-2026-45445: AES-OCB IV Ignored on EVP_Cipher() Path (bsc#1266355).\n- CVE-2026-45446: Incorrect Tag Processing for Empty Messages in AES-GCM-SIV and AES-SIV modes (bsc#1266356).\n- CVE-2026-45447: Heap Use-After-Free in OpenSSL PKCS7_verify() (bsc#1266357).\n","status":"published","published":"2026-06-26T11:06:32Z","modified":"2026-06-27T08:45:05.198594059Z","updated_at":"2026-11-02T15:54:04.519245Z"}]}}