{"id":"CVE-2026-44509","aliases":["DEBIAN-CVE-2026-44509","EUVD-2026-46100","SUSE-SU-2026:23289-1","SUSE-SU-2026:23323-1","openSUSE-SU-2026:11869-1","openSUSE-SU-2026:21650-1"],"status":"rejected","title":"Security update for rsync","description":"** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2026-43619. Reason: This candidate is a duplicate of CVE-2026-43619. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2026-43619 instead of this candidate.","severity":{"version":"3.1","score":6.3,"vector":"CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N","level":"medium","from":"euvd"},"facts":{"in_kev":false,"known_exploited":false,"public_exploit":false,"fix_available":false},"published":"2026-07-20T20:27:21Z","modified":"2026-09-24T18:23:15Z","affected":[{"source":"osv","ecosystem":"SUSE:Linux Micro 6.2","package":"rsync","ranges":[{"type":"ECOSYSTEM","events":[{"introduced":"0"},{"fixed":"3.4.1-160000.6.1"}]}],"bundled":41},{"source":"osv","ecosystem":"SUSE:Linux Enterprise Server 16.0","package":"rsync","ranges":[{"type":"ECOSYSTEM","events":[{"introduced":"0"},{"fixed":"3.4.1-160000.6.1"}]}],"bundled":41},{"source":"osv","ecosystem":"SUSE:Linux Enterprise Server for SAP applications 16.0","package":"rsync","ranges":[{"type":"ECOSYSTEM","events":[{"introduced":"0"},{"fixed":"3.4.1-160000.6.1"}]}],"bundled":41},{"source":"osv","ecosystem":"openSUSE:Tumbleweed","package":"rsync","ranges":[{"type":"ECOSYSTEM","events":[{"introduced":"0"},{"fixed":"3.5.1-1.1"}]}],"bundled":37},{"source":"osv","ecosystem":"openSUSE:Leap 16.0","package":"rsync","ranges":[{"type":"ECOSYSTEM","events":[{"introduced":"0"},{"fixed":"3.4.1-160000.6.1"}]}],"bundled":41}],"references":[{"url":"https://security-tracker.debian.org/tracker/CVE-2026-44509","tags":["advisory"]},{"url":"https://www.suse.com/support/update/announcement/2026/suse-su-202623289-1/","tags":["advisory"]},{"url":"https://bugzilla.suse.com/1269039","tags":["report"]},{"url":"https://bugzilla.suse.com/1269040","tags":["report"]},{"url":"https://bugzilla.suse.com/1269041","tags":["report"]},{"url":"https://bugzilla.suse.com/1269042","tags":["report"]},{"url":"https://bugzilla.suse.com/1269043","tags":["report"]},{"url":"https://bugzilla.suse.com/1269044","tags":["report"]},{"url":"https://bugzilla.suse.com/1269045","tags":["report"]},{"url":"https://bugzilla.suse.com/1269046","tags":["report"]},{"url":"https://bugzilla.suse.com/1269047","tags":["report"]},{"url":"https://bugzilla.suse.com/1269048","tags":["report"]},{"url":"https://bugzilla.suse.com/1269049","tags":["report"]},{"url":"https://bugzilla.suse.com/1269050","tags":["report"]},{"url":"https://bugzilla.suse.com/1269051","tags":["report"]},{"url":"https://bugzilla.suse.com/1269052","tags":["report"]},{"url":"https://bugzilla.suse.com/1269053","tags":["report"]},{"url":"https://bugzilla.suse.com/1269054","tags":["report"]},{"url":"https://bugzilla.suse.com/1269055","tags":["report"]},{"url":"https://bugzilla.suse.com/1269056","tags":["report"]},{"url":"https://bugzilla.suse.com/1269057","tags":["report"]},{"url":"https://bugzilla.suse.com/1269058","tags":["report"]},{"url":"https://bugzilla.suse.com/1269060","tags":["report"]},{"url":"https://bugzilla.suse.com/1271931","tags":["report"]},{"url":"https://bugzilla.suse.com/1271932","tags":["report"]},{"url":"https://bugzilla.suse.com/1271933","tags":["report"]},{"url":"https://bugzilla.suse.com/1271934","tags":["report"]},{"url":"https://bugzilla.suse.com/1273429","tags":["report"]},{"url":"https://bugzilla.suse.com/1273430","tags":["report"]},{"url":"https://bugzilla.suse.com/1273431","tags":["report"]},{"url":"https://bugzilla.suse.com/1273432","tags":["report"]},{"url":"https://bugzilla.suse.com/1273433","tags":["report"]},{"url":"https://bugzilla.suse.com/1273434","tags":["report"]},{"url":"https://bugzilla.suse.com/1273435","tags":["report"]},{"url":"https://bugzilla.suse.com/1273436","tags":["report"]},{"url":"https://bugzilla.suse.com/1273437","tags":["report"]},{"url":"https://bugzilla.suse.com/1273438","tags":["report"]},{"url":"https://bugzilla.suse.com/1273439","tags":["report"]},{"url":"https://bugzilla.suse.com/1273440","tags":["report"]},{"url":"https://bugzilla.suse.com/1273441","tags":["report"]},{"url":"https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-43617","tags":["web"]},{"url":"https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-43618","tags":["web"]},{"url":"https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-43619","tags":["web"]},{"url":"https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-43620","tags":["web"]},{"url":"https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-44507","tags":["web"]},{"url":"https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-44508","tags":["web"]},{"url":"https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-44509","tags":["web"]},{"url":"https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-44510","tags":["web"]},{"url":"https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-53783","tags":["web"]},{"url":"https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-53784","tags":["web"]},{"url":"https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-53785","tags":["web"]},{"url":"https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-53786","tags":["web"]},{"url":"https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-53788","tags":["web"]},{"url":"https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-53789","tags":["web"]},{"url":"https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-53790","tags":["web"]},{"url":"https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-53791","tags":["web"]},{"url":"https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-53792","tags":["web"]},{"url":"https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-53793","tags":["web"]},{"url":"https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-53794","tags":["web"]},{"url":"https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-53795","tags":["web"]},{"url":"https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-53796","tags":["web"]},{"url":"https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-53797","tags":["web"]},{"url":"https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-53798","tags":["web"]},{"url":"https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-53799","tags":["web"]},{"url":"https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-53800","tags":["web"]},{"url":"https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-53801","tags":["web"]},{"url":"https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-53802","tags":["web"]},{"url":"https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-53803","tags":["web"]},{"url":"https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-70452","tags":["web"]},{"url":"https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-70453","tags":["web"]},{"url":"https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-70454","tags":["web"]},{"url":"https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-70455","tags":["web"]},{"url":"https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-70456","tags":["web"]},{"url":"https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-70457","tags":["web"]},{"url":"https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-70458","tags":["web"]},{"url":"https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-70459","tags":["web"]},{"url":"https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-70460","tags":["web"]},{"url":"https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-70461","tags":["web"]},{"url":"https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-70462","tags":["web"]},{"url":"https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-70463","tags":["web"]},{"url":"https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-70464","tags":["web"]},{"url":"https://www.suse.com/support/update/announcement/2026/suse-su-202623323-1/","tags":["advisory"]},{"url":"","tags":["advisory"]}],"sources":{"cve":[{"id":"CVE-2026-44509","description":"** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2026-43619. Reason: This candidate is a duplicate of CVE-2026-43619. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2026-43619 instead of this candidate.","status":"rejected","published":"2026-07-20T20:27:21.42Z","modified":"2026-07-21T15:11:05.589Z","updated_at":"2026-11-02T13:43:00.288193Z"}],"euvd":[{"id":"EUVD-2026-46100","description":"** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2026-43619. Reason: This candidate is a duplicate of CVE-2026-43619. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2026-43619 instead of this candidate.","status":"published","published":"2026-07-20T20:27:21Z","modified":"2026-07-21T15:11:05Z","cvss":[{"version":"3.1","score":6.3,"vector":"CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N","level":"medium"}],"updated_at":"2026-11-02T18:19:47.436242Z"}],"nvd":[{"id":"CVE-2026-44509","description":"Rejected reason: ** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2026-43619. Reason: This candidate is a duplicate of CVE-2026-43619. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2026-43619 instead of this candidate.","status":"rejected","published":"2026-07-20T21:16:47.243Z","modified":"2026-07-21T16:17:10.907Z","updated_at":"2026-11-02T14:12:31.024898Z"}],"osv":[{"id":"DEBIAN-CVE-2026-44509","description":"Rsync is a file-copying tool that uses a delta-transfer algorithm to synchronize remote and local files. In versions prior to 3.4.3, previous bug fixes for symlink races in open() calls missed races in other path based system calls like chmod() and chown(). For rsync daemons with \"use chroot = no\" this allows an attacker with local filesystem access to change permissions, ownership or timestamp on a file outside the exported module. This issue is fixed in version 3.4.3.","status":"withdrawn","published":"2026-07-20T21:16:47.243Z","modified":"2026-07-22T02:00:46.293118783Z","cvss":[{"version":"3.1","score":6.3,"vector":"CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N","level":"medium"}],"updated_at":"2026-11-02T15:45:55.669088Z"},{"id":"openSUSE-SU-2026:11869-1","title":"rsync-3.5.1-1.1 on GA media","description":"These are all security issues fixed in the rsync-3.5.1-1.1 package on the GA media of openSUSE Tumbleweed.","status":"published","published":"2026-09-23T00:00:00Z","modified":"2026-09-24T18:23:15.541661994Z","updated_at":"2026-11-02T16:58:40.245664Z"},{"id":"openSUSE-SU-2026:21650-1","title":"Security update for rsync","description":"This update for rsync fixes the following issues:\n\n- CVE-2026-53783: rrsync restricted-directory escape (validation-vs-exec race + unsafe option allowlist) (bsc#1269041).\n- CVE-2026-53784: Daemon module-root chdir escape under \"use chroot = no\" (bsc#1269042).\n- CVE-2026-53785: --relative implied-parent creation escapes the destination tree (bsc#1269043).\n- CVE-2026-53786: Daemon --filter merge file bypasses the module filter list (bsc#1269044).\n- CVE-2026-53788: Daemon name-converter accepts newline-bearing names into its line protocol (bsc#1269046).\n- CVE-2026-53789: Malicious sender expands --delete scope by reclassifying an implied parent (bsc#1269047).\n- CVE-2026-53790: Command / argument injection via unquoted peer- or host-controlled values (bsc#1269048).\n- CVE-2026-53791: PROXY-protocol mode lets a direct client spoof the daemon's source address (bsc#1269049).\n- CVE-2026-53792: Receiver-supplied zero checksum block length drives sender matching negative (bsc#1269050).\n- CVE-2026-53793: Chroot \"/./\" inner-module escape via a parent-component symlink (bsc#1269051).\n- CVE-2026-53794: Remote peer disables the per-allocation sanity cap via --max-alloc=0 (bsc#1269052).\n- CVE-2026-53795: Receiver write escape via an absolute --temp-dir / --link-dest disabling rename/link confinement\n  (bsc#1269053).\n- CVE-2026-53796: Non-daemon receiver destination-chdir symlink race (bsc#1269054).\n- CVE-2026-53797: Sender source-tree parent-component symlink race -\u003e out-of-tree disclosure (bsc#1269055).\n- CVE-2026-53798: Daemon name-converter empty response maps an unknown name to uid/gid 0 (bsc#1269045).\n- CVE-2026-53799: Receiver ACL/xattr application follows a symlink-race -\u003e arbitrary ACL set (bsc#1269056).\n- CVE-2026-53800: Sender --remove-source-files unlink follows a parent-component symlink race -\u003e arbitrary file deletion\n  outside the source tree (bsc#1269057).\n- CVE-2026-53801: Sender/daemon directory-scan enumeration escapes the transfer root / module -\u003e out-of-tree disclosure\n  (bsc#1269058).\n- CVE-2026-53802: Arbitrary file read / transfer-shaping via symlinked operator-supplied input files (bsc#1269039).\n- CVE-2026-53803: Arbitrary file write / privilege escalation via symlinked operator-supplied output paths\n  (bsc#1269040).\n- CVE-2026-70452: `hosts deny` fails OPEN when a configured hostname cannot be resolved, admitting the host it was meant\n  to block (bsc#1273441).\n- CVE-2026-70453: Quadratic CPU exhaustion in hash_search() from a crafted equal-weak-checksum chain (bsc#1273440).\n- CVE-2026-70454: rsync-ssl establishes an unauthenticated TLS connection (bsc#1273439).\n- CVE-2026-70455: Peer-controlled Zstandard worker exhaustion on an rsync daemon (bsc#1273438).\n- CVE-2026-70456: Remote out-of-bounds heap write in read_args() when the argument count lands exactly on maxargs\n  (bsc#1273437).\n- CVE-2026-70457: Attacker-chosen-offset write in parse_size_arg() error formatting (bsc#1273436).\n- CVE-2026-70458: Out-of-bounds write from a FLAG_HLINKED file entry accepted without -H (bsc#1273435).\n- CVE-2026-70459: Per-connection daemon child crash from a crafted first incremental file list with a non-directory\n  transfer root (bsc#1273434).\n- CVE-2026-70460: Daemon module-root escape through a peer-supplied --partial-dir / --backup-dir resolving via an in-\n  module symlink (bsc#1273433).\n- CVE-2026-70461: Peer-driven one-byte heap out-of-bounds write in add_implied_include() (bsc#1273432).\n- CVE-2026-70462: Peer-supplied MSG_IO_TIMEOUT defeats the client's own I/O timeout (bsc#1273431).\n- CVE-2026-70463: \"auth users\" ignores documented comma-only parsing, silently skipping a deny/read-only rule\n  (bsc#1273430).\n- CVE-2026-70464: Unauthenticated pre-transfer handshake DoS locks out an rsync daemon module (bsc#1273429).\n","status":"published","published":"2026-08-26T12:30:55Z","modified":"2026-08-27T17:30:03.680559724Z","updated_at":"2026-11-02T16:58:41.885092Z"},{"id":"SUSE-SU-2026:23289-1","title":"Security update for rsync","description":"This update for rsync fixes the following issues:\n\n- CVE-2026-53783: rrsync restricted-directory escape (validation-vs-exec race + unsafe option allowlist) (bsc#1269041).\n- CVE-2026-53784: Daemon module-root chdir escape under \"use chroot = no\" (bsc#1269042).\n- CVE-2026-53785: --relative implied-parent creation escapes the destination tree (bsc#1269043).\n- CVE-2026-53786: Daemon --filter merge file bypasses the module filter list (bsc#1269044).\n- CVE-2026-53788: Daemon name-converter accepts newline-bearing names into its line protocol (bsc#1269046).\n- CVE-2026-53789: Malicious sender expands --delete scope by reclassifying an implied parent (bsc#1269047).\n- CVE-2026-53790: Command / argument injection via unquoted peer- or host-controlled values (bsc#1269048).\n- CVE-2026-53791: PROXY-protocol mode lets a direct client spoof the daemon's source address (bsc#1269049).\n- CVE-2026-53792: Receiver-supplied zero checksum block length drives sender matching negative (bsc#1269050).\n- CVE-2026-53793: Chroot \"/./\" inner-module escape via a parent-component symlink (bsc#1269051).\n- CVE-2026-53794: Remote peer disables the per-allocation sanity cap via --max-alloc=0 (bsc#1269052).\n- CVE-2026-53795: Receiver write escape via an absolute --temp-dir / --link-dest disabling rename/link confinement\n  (bsc#1269053).\n- CVE-2026-53796: Non-daemon receiver destination-chdir symlink race (bsc#1269054).\n- CVE-2026-53797: Sender source-tree parent-component symlink race -\u003e out-of-tree disclosure (bsc#1269055).\n- CVE-2026-53798: Daemon name-converter empty response maps an unknown name to uid/gid 0 (bsc#1269045).\n- CVE-2026-53799: Receiver ACL/xattr application follows a symlink-race -\u003e arbitrary ACL set (bsc#1269056).\n- CVE-2026-53800: Sender --remove-source-files unlink follows a parent-component symlink race -\u003e arbitrary file deletion\n  outside the source tree (bsc#1269057).\n- CVE-2026-53801: Sender/daemon directory-scan enumeration escapes the transfer root / module -\u003e out-of-tree disclosure\n  (bsc#1269058).\n- CVE-2026-53802: Arbitrary file read / transfer-shaping via symlinked operator-supplied input files (bsc#1269039).\n- CVE-2026-53803: Arbitrary file write / privilege escalation via symlinked operator-supplied output paths\n  (bsc#1269040).\n- CVE-2026-70452: `hosts deny` fails OPEN when a configured hostname cannot be resolved, admitting the host it was meant\n  to block (bsc#1273441).\n- CVE-2026-70453: Quadratic CPU exhaustion in hash_search() from a crafted equal-weak-checksum chain (bsc#1273440).\n- CVE-2026-70454: rsync-ssl establishes an unauthenticated TLS connection (bsc#1273439).\n- CVE-2026-70455: Peer-controlled Zstandard worker exhaustion on an rsync daemon (bsc#1273438).\n- CVE-2026-70456: Remote out-of-bounds heap write in read_args() when the argument count lands exactly on maxargs\n  (bsc#1273437).\n- CVE-2026-70457: Attacker-chosen-offset write in parse_size_arg() error formatting (bsc#1273436).\n- CVE-2026-70458: Out-of-bounds write from a FLAG_HLINKED file entry accepted without -H (bsc#1273435).\n- CVE-2026-70459: Per-connection daemon child crash from a crafted first incremental file list with a non-directory\n  transfer root (bsc#1273434).\n- CVE-2026-70460: Daemon module-root escape through a peer-supplied --partial-dir / --backup-dir resolving via an in-\n  module symlink (bsc#1273433).\n- CVE-2026-70461: Peer-driven one-byte heap out-of-bounds write in add_implied_include() (bsc#1273432).\n- CVE-2026-70462: Peer-supplied MSG_IO_TIMEOUT defeats the client's own I/O timeout (bsc#1273431).\n- CVE-2026-70463: \"auth users\" ignores documented comma-only parsing, silently skipping a deny/read-only rule\n  (bsc#1273430).\n- CVE-2026-70464: Unauthenticated pre-transfer handshake DoS locks out an rsync daemon module (bsc#1273429).\n","status":"published","published":"2026-08-26T12:30:35Z","modified":"2026-09-04T18:23:13.554181498Z","updated_at":"2026-11-02T15:54:03.503431Z"},{"id":"SUSE-SU-2026:23323-1","title":"Security update for rsync","description":"This update for rsync fixes the following issues:\n\n- CVE-2026-53783: rrsync restricted-directory escape (validation-vs-exec race + unsafe option allowlist) (bsc#1269041).\n- CVE-2026-53784: Daemon module-root chdir escape under \"use chroot = no\" (bsc#1269042).\n- CVE-2026-53785: --relative implied-parent creation escapes the destination tree (bsc#1269043).\n- CVE-2026-53786: Daemon --filter merge file bypasses the module filter list (bsc#1269044).\n- CVE-2026-53788: Daemon name-converter accepts newline-bearing names into its line protocol (bsc#1269046).\n- CVE-2026-53789: Malicious sender expands --delete scope by reclassifying an implied parent (bsc#1269047).\n- CVE-2026-53790: Command / argument injection via unquoted peer- or host-controlled values (bsc#1269048).\n- CVE-2026-53791: PROXY-protocol mode lets a direct client spoof the daemon's source address (bsc#1269049).\n- CVE-2026-53792: Receiver-supplied zero checksum block length drives sender matching negative (bsc#1269050).\n- CVE-2026-53793: Chroot \"/./\" inner-module escape via a parent-component symlink (bsc#1269051).\n- CVE-2026-53794: Remote peer disables the per-allocation sanity cap via --max-alloc=0 (bsc#1269052).\n- CVE-2026-53795: Receiver write escape via an absolute --temp-dir / --link-dest disabling rename/link confinement\n  (bsc#1269053).\n- CVE-2026-53796: Non-daemon receiver destination-chdir symlink race (bsc#1269054).\n- CVE-2026-53797: Sender source-tree parent-component symlink race -\u003e out-of-tree disclosure (bsc#1269055).\n- CVE-2026-53798: Daemon name-converter empty response maps an unknown name to uid/gid 0 (bsc#1269045).\n- CVE-2026-53799: Receiver ACL/xattr application follows a symlink-race -\u003e arbitrary ACL set (bsc#1269056).\n- CVE-2026-53800: Sender --remove-source-files unlink follows a parent-component symlink race -\u003e arbitrary file deletion\n  outside the source tree (bsc#1269057).\n- CVE-2026-53801: Sender/daemon directory-scan enumeration escapes the transfer root / module -\u003e out-of-tree disclosure\n  (bsc#1269058).\n- CVE-2026-53802: Arbitrary file read / transfer-shaping via symlinked operator-supplied input files (bsc#1269039).\n- CVE-2026-53803: Arbitrary file write / privilege escalation via symlinked operator-supplied output paths\n  (bsc#1269040).\n- CVE-2026-70452: `hosts deny` fails OPEN when a configured hostname cannot be resolved, admitting the host it was meant\n  to block (bsc#1273441).\n- CVE-2026-70453: Quadratic CPU exhaustion in hash_search() from a crafted equal-weak-checksum chain (bsc#1273440).\n- CVE-2026-70454: rsync-ssl establishes an unauthenticated TLS connection (bsc#1273439).\n- CVE-2026-70455: Peer-controlled Zstandard worker exhaustion on an rsync daemon (bsc#1273438).\n- CVE-2026-70456: Remote out-of-bounds heap write in read_args() when the argument count lands exactly on maxargs\n  (bsc#1273437).\n- CVE-2026-70457: Attacker-chosen-offset write in parse_size_arg() error formatting (bsc#1273436).\n- CVE-2026-70458: Out-of-bounds write from a FLAG_HLINKED file entry accepted without -H (bsc#1273435).\n- CVE-2026-70459: Per-connection daemon child crash from a crafted first incremental file list with a non-directory\n  transfer root (bsc#1273434).\n- CVE-2026-70460: Daemon module-root escape through a peer-supplied --partial-dir / --backup-dir resolving via an in-\n  module symlink (bsc#1273433).\n- CVE-2026-70461: Peer-driven one-byte heap out-of-bounds write in add_implied_include() (bsc#1273432).\n- CVE-2026-70462: Peer-supplied MSG_IO_TIMEOUT defeats the client's own I/O timeout (bsc#1273431).\n- CVE-2026-70463: \"auth users\" ignores documented comma-only parsing, silently skipping a deny/read-only rule\n  (bsc#1273430).\n- CVE-2026-70464: Unauthenticated pre-transfer handshake DoS locks out an rsync daemon module (bsc#1273429).\n","status":"published","published":"2026-08-26T12:30:35Z","modified":"2026-09-10T18:23:10.543995859Z","updated_at":"2026-11-02T15:54:03.503431Z"}]}}