{"id":"CVE-2026-55834","aliases":["EUVD-2026-67828","GHSA-2wvm-8mvp-22qv","GO-2026-6305","SUSE-SU-2026:23692-1","SUSE-SU-2026:23712-1","openSUSE-SU-2026:21812-1"],"status":"published","title":"Pocket ID: Open Redirect on the OIDC /authorize page via unvalidated redirect_uri with prompt=none","description":"Pocket ID is an OIDC provider that allows users to authenticate with their passkeys to services. From 2.6.0 until 2.9.0, frontend/src/routes/authorize/+page.ts reads the redirect_uri query parameter and frontend/src/routes/authorize/+page.svelte uses the raw callbackURL in redirectWithError when prompt=none cannot complete silent authorization. The client-side path only blocks javascript and data schemes and does not invoke the backend callback allow-list validation, so an unauthenticated attacker who knows a valid client_id can redirect a victim browser to an arbitrary HTTP or HTTPS origin for phishing or OIDC error and state smuggling. This issue is fixed in version 2.9.0.","severity":{"version":"3.1","score":4.3,"vector":"CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N","level":"medium","assessor":"cna","from":"cve"},"epss":{"day":"2026-11-08","score":0.00373,"percentile":0.31539,"model":"v2026.06.15"},"facts":{"in_kev":false,"known_exploited":false,"public_exploit":false,"fix_available":true},"cwes":["CWE-601"],"published":"2026-08-28T16:27:58Z","modified":"2026-10-28T02:31:11Z","fixes":[{"ecosystem":"Go","package":"github.com/pocket-id/pocket-id/backend","fixed_in":["2.9.0"],"sources":["ghsa","osv"]}],"affected":[{"source":"ghsa","ecosystem":"Go","package":"github.com/pocket-id/pocket-id/backend","ranges":[{"type":"ECOSYSTEM","events":[{"introduced":"2.6.0"},{"last_affected":"2.8.0"},{"fixed":"2.9.0"}]}]},{"source":"osv","ecosystem":"Go","package":"github.com/pocket-id/pocket-id/backend","ranges":[{"type":"SEMVER","events":[{"introduced":"2.6.0"},{"fixed":"2.9.0"}]}]},{"source":"osv","ecosystem":"Go","package":"github.com/pocket-id/pocket-id/backend","ranges":[{"type":"SEMVER","events":[{"introduced":"0"}]}]},{"source":"osv","ecosystem":"SUSE:Linux Enterprise Server 16.0","package":"govulncheck-vulndb","ranges":[{"type":"ECOSYSTEM","events":[{"introduced":"0"},{"fixed":"0.0.20260902T191204-160000.1.1"}]}],"bundled":39},{"source":"osv","ecosystem":"SUSE:Linux Enterprise Server for SAP applications 16.0","package":"govulncheck-vulndb","ranges":[{"type":"ECOSYSTEM","events":[{"introduced":"0"},{"fixed":"0.0.20260902T191204-160000.1.1"}]}],"bundled":39},{"source":"osv","ecosystem":"SUSE:Linux Enterprise Server 16.0","package":"govulncheck-vulndb","ranges":[{"type":"ECOSYSTEM","events":[{"introduced":"0"},{"fixed":"0.0.20260902T191204-160000.1.1"}]}],"bundled":39},{"source":"osv","ecosystem":"SUSE:Linux Enterprise Server for SAP applications 16.0","package":"govulncheck-vulndb","ranges":[{"type":"ECOSYSTEM","events":[{"introduced":"0"},{"fixed":"0.0.20260902T191204-160000.1.1"}]}],"bundled":39},{"source":"osv","ecosystem":"openSUSE:Leap 16.0","package":"govulncheck-vulndb","ranges":[{"type":"ECOSYSTEM","events":[{"introduced":"0"},{"fixed":"0.0.20260902T191204-160000.1.1"}]}],"bundled":39}],"products":[{"vendor":"pocket-id","product":"pocket-id"}],"references":[{"url":"https://github.com/pocket-id/pocket-id/security/advisories/GHSA-2wvm-8mvp-22qv","tags":["x_refsource_CONFIRM","exploit","advisory","web"]},{"url":"https://github.com/pocket-id/pocket-id/commit/8a7577497131229badb35cb4b3a4227b1300afff","tags":["x_refsource_MISC","fix","web"]},{"url":"https://github.com/pocket-id/pocket-id/releases/tag/v2.9.0","tags":["x_refsource_MISC","web"]},{"url":"https://github.com/advisories/GHSA-2wvm-8mvp-22qv"},{"url":"https://github.com/CVEProject/cvelistV5/tree/main/cves/2026/55xxx/CVE-2026-55834.json","tags":["advisory"]},{"url":"https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-55834","tags":["advisory"]},{"url":"https://github.com/pocket-id/pocket-id","tags":["package"]},{"url":"https://www.suse.com/support/update/announcement/2026/suse-su-202623692-1/","tags":["advisory"]},{"url":"https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-20909","tags":["web"]},{"url":"https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-22547","tags":["web"]},{"url":"https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-24690","tags":["web"]},{"url":"https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-25712","tags":["web"]},{"url":"https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-25718","tags":["web"]},{"url":"https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-26232","tags":["web"]},{"url":"https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-26247","tags":["web"]},{"url":"https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-26307","tags":["web"]},{"url":"https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-27657","tags":["web"]},{"url":"https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-27878","tags":["web"]},{"url":"https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-28705","tags":["web"]},{"url":"https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-54746","tags":["web"]},{"url":"https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-54754","tags":["web"]},{"url":"https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-54755","tags":["web"]},{"url":"https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-54766","tags":["web"]},{"url":"https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-55064","tags":["web"]},{"url":"https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-55065","tags":["web"]},{"url":"https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-55066","tags":["web"]},{"url":"https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-55067","tags":["web"]},{"url":"https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-55068","tags":["web"]},{"url":"https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-55108","tags":["web"]},{"url":"https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-55245","tags":["web"]},{"url":"https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-55484","tags":["web"]},{"url":"https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-55569","tags":["web"]},{"url":"https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-55588","tags":["web"]},{"url":"https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-55621","tags":["web"]},{"url":"https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-55622","tags":["web"]},{"url":"https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-55678","tags":["web"]},{"url":"https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-55761","tags":["web"]},{"url":"https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-55763","tags":["web"]},{"url":"https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-55764","tags":["web"]},{"url":"https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-55784","tags":["web"]},{"url":"https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-55785","tags":["web"]},{"url":"https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-55834","tags":["web"]},{"url":"https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-55873","tags":["web"]},{"url":"https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-55874","tags":["web"]},{"url":"https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-56854","tags":["web"]},{"url":"https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-56855","tags":["web"]},{"url":"https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-78662","tags":["web"]},{"url":"https://www.suse.com/support/update/announcement/2026/suse-su-202623712-1/","tags":["advisory"]},{"url":"","tags":["advisory"]}],"sources":{"cve":[{"id":"CVE-2026-55834","title":"Pocket ID: Open Redirect on the OIDC /authorize page via unvalidated redirect_uri with prompt=none","description":"Pocket ID is an OIDC provider that allows users to authenticate with their passkeys to services. From 2.6.0 until 2.9.0, frontend/src/routes/authorize/+page.ts reads the redirect_uri query parameter and frontend/src/routes/authorize/+page.svelte uses the raw callbackURL in redirectWithError when prompt=none cannot complete silent authorization. The client-side path only blocks javascript and data schemes and does not invoke the backend callback allow-list validation, so an unauthenticated attacker who knows a valid client_id can redirect a victim browser to an arbitrary HTTP or HTTPS origin for phishing or OIDC error and state smuggling. This issue is fixed in version 2.9.0.","status":"published","published":"2026-08-28T16:27:58.324Z","modified":"2026-08-28T20:28:38.924Z","cvss":[{"version":"3.1","score":4.3,"vector":"CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N","level":"medium","assessor":"cna"}],"cwes":["CWE-601"],"updated_at":"2026-11-02T14:20:12.260247Z"}],"euvd":[{"id":"EUVD-2026-67828","description":"Pocket ID is an OIDC provider that allows users to authenticate with their passkeys to services. From 2.6.0 until 2.9.0, frontend/src/routes/authorize/+page.ts reads the redirect_uri query parameter and frontend/src/routes/authorize/+page.svelte uses the raw callbackURL in redirectWithError when prompt=none cannot complete silent authorization. The client-side path only blocks javascript and data schemes and does not invoke the backend callback allow-list validation, so an unauthenticated attacker who knows a valid client_id can redirect a victim browser to an arbitrary HTTP or HTTPS origin for phishing or OIDC error and state smuggling. This issue is fixed in version 2.9.0.","status":"published","published":"2026-08-28T16:27:58Z","modified":"2026-08-28T20:28:38Z","cvss":[{"version":"3.1","score":4.3,"vector":"CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N","level":"medium"}],"updated_at":"2026-11-02T18:01:22.342607Z"}],"ghsa":[{"id":"GHSA-2wvm-8mvp-22qv","title":"Pocket-ID has an Open Redirect on the OIDC /authorize page via unvalidated redirect_uri with prompt=none","description":"### Summary\nThe OIDC authorization page in the pocket-id frontend redirects the browser to an attacker-controlled URL without consulting the backend redirect_uri allow-list when the request uses prompt=none. An attacker who knows a valid client_id can craft an /authorize link that sends a victim (or a victim's browser doing a silent re-auth) to any external https URL, enabling phishing and OAuth response smuggling. The backend allow-list validation that protects the normal authenticated flow is bypassed because this path is handled entirely client-side.\n\n### Details\nFor an OIDC authorization request with prompt=none, the SvelteKit frontend short-circuits the flow before the backend ever validates the redirect_uri against the client's registered callback list.\n\nFile: frontend/src/routes/authorize/+page.ts (line 14) parses the raw redirect_uri query parameter from the incoming URL.\n\nFile: frontend/src/routes/authorize/+page.svelte - in onMount(), when the request carries prompt=none and the user cannot be silently authorized (for example the visitor is not logged in, so login_required must be returned), the page builds the callback URL from the raw redirect_uri and performs:\n\n    window.location.href = `${callbackURL}?error=login_required...`\n\nThe callbackURL is taken directly from the user-supplied redirect_uri. The only filtering applied is a scheme check that blocks javascript: and data: URLs; any http: or https: origin passes through. The backend allow-list validator GetCallbackURLFromList (which the authenticated code path uses to confirm the redirect_uri matches one of the client's registered callback URLs) is never invoked on this branch.\n\nThis means the per-client redirect_uri allow-list, the central control that makes redirect_uri safe in OAuth/OIDC, is not enforced for the prompt=none error-return path. A client_id is not a secret: client metadata is retrievable at /api/oidc/clients/:id/meta, and client_ids appear in any integration's authorization links.\n\nConfirmation that the bypass is purely frontend: an unauthenticated POST to the backend /api/oidc/authorize endpoint correctly returns 401 ({\"error\":\"You are not signed in\"}), so the backend never authorizes the request. The redirect nonetheless happens in the browser because +page.svelte issues window.location.href before/without a successful backend authorization.\n\nA second variant exists for an authenticated victim: when prompt=none is combined with a first-time (not yet consented) authorization of a client, the same client-side path can be reached.\n\nContrast: the standard interactive flow (no prompt=none) posts to the backend, which validates redirect_uri against the registered list before returning a callback. The defect is specific to the client-side prompt=none short-circuit.\n\n### PoC\nPrerequisites: a running pocket-id instance, a registered OIDC client whose client_id is known to the attacker (obtainable from /api/oidc/clients/:id/meta or any existing integration), and a victim whose browser opens the link (the victim need not be logged in for the login_required branch).\n\n1. Attacker constructs an authorization URL pointing at the victim's pocket-id, supplying an external redirect_uri and prompt=none:\n\n   https://idp.victim.example/authorize?client_id=\u003cknown_client_id\u003e\u0026redirect_uri=https://attacker.example/collect\u0026response_type=code\u0026scope=openid\u0026prompt=none\n\n2. Victim opens the link. The frontend authorize page loads, determines the silent auth cannot succeed (login_required), and executes:\n\n   window.location.href = \"https://attacker.example/collect?error=login_required\u0026state=...\"\n\n3. The browser is redirected to https://attacker.example/collect. Expected result on a fixed build: the page would refuse the redirect because redirect_uri does not match the client's registered callback list and would render an error in place instead of navigating off-origin.\n\nValidation level: code-level confirmation at commit fc42f62. This is a browser-side window.location.href redirect, so it is not reproducible with curl; the backend was confirmed to reject the unauthenticated request (401) while the frontend performs the navigation regardless. Evidence notes saved to screenshots/001_open_redirect_evidence.txt.\n\n### Impact\nUnauthenticated attacker, victim interaction required (clicking or being silently redirected). The trusted pocket-id domain is used to bounce a victim to an arbitrary external site, which is effective for credential phishing (the user trusts the IdP origin in the initial link) and for leaking OIDC error/state parameters to an attacker endpoint. Integrity impact is limited to redirection; no confidentiality or availability loss of pocket-id itself. Note: an abandoned PR (#1450) addressed a related protocol-relative URL issue in a different email-redirect path but was not merged and does not cover this authorize-page path.","status":"published","published":"2026-08-28T16:28:20Z","modified":"2026-08-28T16:28:20Z","cvss":[{"version":"3.1","score":4.3,"vector":"CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N","level":"medium"}],"cwes":["CWE-601"],"updated_at":"2026-11-02T14:41:07.031507Z"}],"nvd":[{"id":"CVE-2026-55834","description":"Pocket ID is an OIDC provider that allows users to authenticate with their passkeys to services. From 2.6.0 until 2.9.0, frontend/src/routes/authorize/+page.ts reads the redirect_uri query parameter and frontend/src/routes/authorize/+page.svelte uses the raw callbackURL in redirectWithError when prompt=none cannot complete silent authorization. The client-side path only blocks javascript and data schemes and does not invoke the backend callback allow-list validation, so an unauthenticated attacker who knows a valid client_id can redirect a victim browser to an arbitrary HTTP or HTTPS origin for phishing or OIDC error and state smuggling. This issue is fixed in version 2.9.0.","status":"published","published":"2026-08-28T20:18:30.03Z","modified":"2026-09-09T21:09:13.08Z","cvss":[{"version":"3.1","score":4.3,"vector":"CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N","level":"medium","assessor":"secondary"}],"cwes":["CWE-601"],"updated_at":"2026-11-02T14:12:42.366888Z"}],"osv":[{"id":"CVE-2026-55834","title":"Pocket ID: Open Redirect on the OIDC /authorize page via unvalidated redirect_uri with prompt=none","description":"Pocket ID is an OIDC provider that allows users to authenticate with their passkeys to services. From 2.6.0 until 2.9.0, frontend/src/routes/authorize/+page.ts reads the redirect_uri query parameter and frontend/src/routes/authorize/+page.svelte uses the raw callbackURL in redirectWithError when prompt=none cannot complete silent authorization. The client-side path only blocks javascript and data schemes and does not invoke the backend callback allow-list validation, so an unauthenticated attacker who knows a valid client_id can redirect a victim browser to an arbitrary HTTP or HTTPS origin for phishing or OIDC error and state smuggling. This issue is fixed in version 2.9.0.","status":"published","published":"2026-08-28T16:27:58.324Z","modified":"2026-10-28T02:31:11.688519556Z","cvss":[{"version":"3.1","score":4.3,"vector":"CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N","level":"medium"}],"cwes":["CWE-601"],"updated_at":"2026-11-02T15:45:11.609219Z"},{"id":"GHSA-2wvm-8mvp-22qv","title":"Pocket-ID has an Open Redirect on the OIDC /authorize page via unvalidated redirect_uri with prompt=none","description":"### Summary\nThe OIDC authorization page in the pocket-id frontend redirects the browser to an attacker-controlled URL without consulting the backend redirect_uri allow-list when the request uses prompt=none. An attacker who knows a valid client_id can craft an /authorize link that sends a victim (or a victim's browser doing a silent re-auth) to any external https URL, enabling phishing and OAuth response smuggling. The backend allow-list validation that protects the normal authenticated flow is bypassed because this path is handled entirely client-side.\n\n### Details\nFor an OIDC authorization request with prompt=none, the SvelteKit frontend short-circuits the flow before the backend ever validates the redirect_uri against the client's registered callback list.\n\nFile: frontend/src/routes/authorize/+page.ts (line 14) parses the raw redirect_uri query parameter from the incoming URL.\n\nFile: frontend/src/routes/authorize/+page.svelte - in onMount(), when the request carries prompt=none and the user cannot be silently authorized (for example the visitor is not logged in, so login_required must be returned), the page builds the callback URL from the raw redirect_uri and performs:\n\n    window.location.href = `${callbackURL}?error=login_required...`\n\nThe callbackURL is taken directly from the user-supplied redirect_uri. The only filtering applied is a scheme check that blocks javascript: and data: URLs; any http: or https: origin passes through. The backend allow-list validator GetCallbackURLFromList (which the authenticated code path uses to confirm the redirect_uri matches one of the client's registered callback URLs) is never invoked on this branch.\n\nThis means the per-client redirect_uri allow-list, the central control that makes redirect_uri safe in OAuth/OIDC, is not enforced for the prompt=none error-return path. A client_id is not a secret: client metadata is retrievable at /api/oidc/clients/:id/meta, and client_ids appear in any integration's authorization links.\n\nConfirmation that the bypass is purely frontend: an unauthenticated POST to the backend /api/oidc/authorize endpoint correctly returns 401 ({\"error\":\"You are not signed in\"}), so the backend never authorizes the request. The redirect nonetheless happens in the browser because +page.svelte issues window.location.href before/without a successful backend authorization.\n\nA second variant exists for an authenticated victim: when prompt=none is combined with a first-time (not yet consented) authorization of a client, the same client-side path can be reached.\n\nContrast: the standard interactive flow (no prompt=none) posts to the backend, which validates redirect_uri against the registered list before returning a callback. The defect is specific to the client-side prompt=none short-circuit.\n\n### PoC\nPrerequisites: a running pocket-id instance, a registered OIDC client whose client_id is known to the attacker (obtainable from /api/oidc/clients/:id/meta or any existing integration), and a victim whose browser opens the link (the victim need not be logged in for the login_required branch).\n\n1. Attacker constructs an authorization URL pointing at the victim's pocket-id, supplying an external redirect_uri and prompt=none:\n\n   https://idp.victim.example/authorize?client_id=\u003cknown_client_id\u003e\u0026redirect_uri=https://attacker.example/collect\u0026response_type=code\u0026scope=openid\u0026prompt=none\n\n2. Victim opens the link. The frontend authorize page loads, determines the silent auth cannot succeed (login_required), and executes:\n\n   window.location.href = \"https://attacker.example/collect?error=login_required\u0026state=...\"\n\n3. The browser is redirected to https://attacker.example/collect. Expected result on a fixed build: the page would refuse the redirect because redirect_uri does not match the client's registered callback list and would render an error in place instead of navigating off-origin.\n\nValidation level: code-level confirmation at commit fc42f62. This is a browser-side window.location.href redirect, so it is not reproducible with curl; the backend was confirmed to reject the unauthenticated request (401) while the frontend performs the navigation regardless. Evidence notes saved to screenshots/001_open_redirect_evidence.txt.\n\n### Impact\nUnauthenticated attacker, victim interaction required (clicking or being silently redirected). The trusted pocket-id domain is used to bounce a victim to an arbitrary external site, which is effective for credential phishing (the user trusts the IdP origin in the initial link) and for leaking OIDC error/state parameters to an attacker endpoint. Integrity impact is limited to redirection; no confidentiality or availability loss of pocket-id itself. Note: an abandoned PR (#1450) addressed a related protocol-relative URL issue in a different email-redirect path but was not merged and does not cover this authorize-page path.","status":"published","published":"2026-08-28T16:28:20Z","modified":"2026-09-02T19:55:44.720187499Z","cvss":[{"version":"3.1","score":4.3,"vector":"CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N","level":"medium"}],"cwes":["CWE-601"],"updated_at":"2026-11-02T15:46:35.050232Z"},{"id":"GO-2026-6305","title":"Pocket-ID has an Open Redirect on the OIDC /authorize page via unvalidated redirect_uri with prompt=none in github.com/pocket-id/pocket-id/backend","description":"Pocket-ID has an Open Redirect on the OIDC /authorize page via unvalidated redirect_uri with prompt=none in github.com/pocket-id/pocket-id/backend.\n\nNOTE: The source advisory for this report contains additional versions that could not be automatically mapped to standard Go module versions.\n\n(If this is causing false-positive reports from vulnerability scanners, please suggest an edit to the report.)\n\nThe additional affected modules and versions are: github.com/pocket-id/pocket-id/backend from v2.6.0 before v2.9.0.","status":"published","published":"2026-09-02T18:37:27Z","modified":"2026-09-02T19:45:13.27538071Z","updated_at":"2026-11-02T15:47:03.11707Z"},{"id":"openSUSE-SU-2026:21812-1","title":"Security update for govulncheck-vulndb","description":"This update for govulncheck-vulndb fixes the following issues:\n\n- Update to version 0.0.20260902T191204 2026-09-02T19:12:04Z (jsc#PED-11136).\n\n Go CVE Numbering Authority IDs added or updated with aliases:\n * GO-2026-6305 CVE-2026-55834 GHSA-2wvm-8mvp-22qv\n * GO-2026-6306 CVE-2026-55064 GHSA-44v6-7fxq-vgf4\n * GO-2026-6307 CVE-2026-55067 GHSA-569v-q83c-3j3g\n * GO-2026-6308 CVE-2026-55066 GHSA-5pg6-m483-7vrg\n * GO-2026-6309 CVE-2026-54746 GHSA-8x7x-83cf-c3pg\n * GO-2026-6310 CVE-2026-54755 GHSA-cgc5-v3f2-8m2v\n * GO-2026-6311 CVE-2026-54766 GHSA-f27p-pw2p-9pr4\n * GO-2026-6312 CVE-2026-55108 GHSA-fmgp-q6jx-gg3x\n * GO-2026-6313 CVE-2026-55065 GHSA-gg93-x632-9ccv\n * GO-2026-6314 CVE-2026-55569 GHSA-mf5c-hw34-4hpp\n * GO-2026-6315 CVE-2026-54754 GHSA-p7gw-2pcp-5pf8\n * GO-2026-6316 CVE-2026-55068 GHSA-x8mj-6p3q-g5pp\n * GO-2026-6317 CVE-2026-55588 GHSA-298f-872v-2rcx\n * GO-2026-6318 CVE-2026-55621 GHSA-64f3-v33m-w89f\n * GO-2026-6319 CVE-2026-55622 GHSA-c9f5-j9c3-mhrg\n * GO-2026-6320 CVE-2026-55245 GHSA-w98g-5w9p-p3rc\n * GO-2026-6321 CVE-2026-55484 GHSA-hr6j-w4mw-g9mj\n * GO-2026-6322 CVE-2026-55678 GHSA-p378-jp5r-gpgw\n * GO-2026-6323 CVE-2026-55763 GHSA-v358-wf77-39xv\n * GO-2026-6324 CVE-2026-55761 GHSA-x626-fcwx-f5pc\n * GO-2026-6325 CVE-2026-27878 GHSA-6xff-cpcq-vpw2\n * GO-2026-6326 CVE-2026-55784 GHSA-334q-h5g3-fpxv\n * GO-2026-6327 CVE-2026-55874 GHSA-56wq-x3wv-3ff4\n * GO-2026-6328 CVE-2026-55785 GHSA-fp46-6vfw-gc9c\n * GO-2026-6329 CVE-2026-55873 GHSA-hgpf-8634-g44c\n * GO-2026-6330 CVE-2026-55764 GHSA-mrpp-v6pg-p54x\n * GO-2026-6333 CVE-2026-25712 GHSA-37w2-86g3-h4qh\n * GO-2026-6334 CVE-2026-24690 GHSA-47rq-xp99-92mx\n * GO-2026-6335 CVE-2026-27657 GHSA-4c8f-3m6h-m56r\n * GO-2026-6336 CVE-2026-26232 GHSA-5v69-g2m3-3hq3\n * GO-2026-6337 CVE-2026-28705 GHSA-7jvx-g65v-r899\n * GO-2026-6338 CVE-2026-22547 GHSA-922f-hfwp-p56f\n * GO-2026-6339 CVE-2026-20909 GHSA-fhq3-p242-2qpf\n * GO-2026-6340 CVE-2026-25718 GHSA-h697-89cp-24q8\n * GO-2026-6341 CVE-2026-26307 GHSA-h9c5-x7g8-4q7f\n * GO-2026-6342 CVE-2026-26247 GHSA-m5ch-ppfx-xv3v\n * GO-2026-6354 CVE-2026-78662\n * GO-2026-6355 CVE-2026-56855\n\n- Update to version 0.0.20260828T144745 2026-08-28T14:47:45Z.\n\n * GO-2026-6303 CVE-2026-56854\n","status":"published","published":"2026-09-08T16:52:09Z","modified":"2026-09-10T18:23:18.964541257Z","updated_at":"2026-11-02T16:58:42.426393Z"},{"id":"SUSE-SU-2026:23692-1","title":"Security update for govulncheck-vulndb","description":"This update for govulncheck-vulndb fixes the following issues:\n\n- Update to version 0.0.20260902T191204 2026-09-02T19:12:04Z (jsc#PED-11136).\n\n Go CVE Numbering Authority IDs added or updated with aliases:\n * GO-2026-6305 CVE-2026-55834 GHSA-2wvm-8mvp-22qv\n * GO-2026-6306 CVE-2026-55064 GHSA-44v6-7fxq-vgf4\n * GO-2026-6307 CVE-2026-55067 GHSA-569v-q83c-3j3g\n * GO-2026-6308 CVE-2026-55066 GHSA-5pg6-m483-7vrg\n * GO-2026-6309 CVE-2026-54746 GHSA-8x7x-83cf-c3pg\n * GO-2026-6310 CVE-2026-54755 GHSA-cgc5-v3f2-8m2v\n * GO-2026-6311 CVE-2026-54766 GHSA-f27p-pw2p-9pr4\n * GO-2026-6312 CVE-2026-55108 GHSA-fmgp-q6jx-gg3x\n * GO-2026-6313 CVE-2026-55065 GHSA-gg93-x632-9ccv\n * GO-2026-6314 CVE-2026-55569 GHSA-mf5c-hw34-4hpp\n * GO-2026-6315 CVE-2026-54754 GHSA-p7gw-2pcp-5pf8\n * GO-2026-6316 CVE-2026-55068 GHSA-x8mj-6p3q-g5pp\n * GO-2026-6317 CVE-2026-55588 GHSA-298f-872v-2rcx\n * GO-2026-6318 CVE-2026-55621 GHSA-64f3-v33m-w89f\n * GO-2026-6319 CVE-2026-55622 GHSA-c9f5-j9c3-mhrg\n * GO-2026-6320 CVE-2026-55245 GHSA-w98g-5w9p-p3rc\n * GO-2026-6321 CVE-2026-55484 GHSA-hr6j-w4mw-g9mj\n * GO-2026-6322 CVE-2026-55678 GHSA-p378-jp5r-gpgw\n * GO-2026-6323 CVE-2026-55763 GHSA-v358-wf77-39xv\n * GO-2026-6324 CVE-2026-55761 GHSA-x626-fcwx-f5pc\n * GO-2026-6325 CVE-2026-27878 GHSA-6xff-cpcq-vpw2\n * GO-2026-6326 CVE-2026-55784 GHSA-334q-h5g3-fpxv\n * GO-2026-6327 CVE-2026-55874 GHSA-56wq-x3wv-3ff4\n * GO-2026-6328 CVE-2026-55785 GHSA-fp46-6vfw-gc9c\n * GO-2026-6329 CVE-2026-55873 GHSA-hgpf-8634-g44c\n * GO-2026-6330 CVE-2026-55764 GHSA-mrpp-v6pg-p54x\n * GO-2026-6333 CVE-2026-25712 GHSA-37w2-86g3-h4qh\n * GO-2026-6334 CVE-2026-24690 GHSA-47rq-xp99-92mx\n * GO-2026-6335 CVE-2026-27657 GHSA-4c8f-3m6h-m56r\n * GO-2026-6336 CVE-2026-26232 GHSA-5v69-g2m3-3hq3\n * GO-2026-6337 CVE-2026-28705 GHSA-7jvx-g65v-r899\n * GO-2026-6338 CVE-2026-22547 GHSA-922f-hfwp-p56f\n * GO-2026-6339 CVE-2026-20909 GHSA-fhq3-p242-2qpf\n * GO-2026-6340 CVE-2026-25718 GHSA-h697-89cp-24q8\n * GO-2026-6341 CVE-2026-26307 GHSA-h9c5-x7g8-4q7f\n * GO-2026-6342 CVE-2026-26247 GHSA-m5ch-ppfx-xv3v\n * GO-2026-6354 CVE-2026-78662\n * GO-2026-6355 CVE-2026-56855\n\n- Update to version 0.0.20260828T144745 2026-08-28T14:47:45Z.\n\n * GO-2026-6303 CVE-2026-56854\n","status":"published","published":"2026-09-08T16:28:52Z","modified":"2026-09-29T18:23:12.31116925Z","updated_at":"2026-11-02T15:54:03.991985Z"},{"id":"SUSE-SU-2026:23712-1","title":"Security update for govulncheck-vulndb","description":"This update for govulncheck-vulndb fixes the following issues:\n\n- Update to version 0.0.20260902T191204 2026-09-02T19:12:04Z (jsc#PED-11136).\n\n Go CVE Numbering Authority IDs added or updated with aliases:\n * GO-2026-6305 CVE-2026-55834 GHSA-2wvm-8mvp-22qv\n * GO-2026-6306 CVE-2026-55064 GHSA-44v6-7fxq-vgf4\n * GO-2026-6307 CVE-2026-55067 GHSA-569v-q83c-3j3g\n * GO-2026-6308 CVE-2026-55066 GHSA-5pg6-m483-7vrg\n * GO-2026-6309 CVE-2026-54746 GHSA-8x7x-83cf-c3pg\n * GO-2026-6310 CVE-2026-54755 GHSA-cgc5-v3f2-8m2v\n * GO-2026-6311 CVE-2026-54766 GHSA-f27p-pw2p-9pr4\n * GO-2026-6312 CVE-2026-55108 GHSA-fmgp-q6jx-gg3x\n * GO-2026-6313 CVE-2026-55065 GHSA-gg93-x632-9ccv\n * GO-2026-6314 CVE-2026-55569 GHSA-mf5c-hw34-4hpp\n * GO-2026-6315 CVE-2026-54754 GHSA-p7gw-2pcp-5pf8\n * GO-2026-6316 CVE-2026-55068 GHSA-x8mj-6p3q-g5pp\n * GO-2026-6317 CVE-2026-55588 GHSA-298f-872v-2rcx\n * GO-2026-6318 CVE-2026-55621 GHSA-64f3-v33m-w89f\n * GO-2026-6319 CVE-2026-55622 GHSA-c9f5-j9c3-mhrg\n * GO-2026-6320 CVE-2026-55245 GHSA-w98g-5w9p-p3rc\n * GO-2026-6321 CVE-2026-55484 GHSA-hr6j-w4mw-g9mj\n * GO-2026-6322 CVE-2026-55678 GHSA-p378-jp5r-gpgw\n * GO-2026-6323 CVE-2026-55763 GHSA-v358-wf77-39xv\n * GO-2026-6324 CVE-2026-55761 GHSA-x626-fcwx-f5pc\n * GO-2026-6325 CVE-2026-27878 GHSA-6xff-cpcq-vpw2\n * GO-2026-6326 CVE-2026-55784 GHSA-334q-h5g3-fpxv\n * GO-2026-6327 CVE-2026-55874 GHSA-56wq-x3wv-3ff4\n * GO-2026-6328 CVE-2026-55785 GHSA-fp46-6vfw-gc9c\n * GO-2026-6329 CVE-2026-55873 GHSA-hgpf-8634-g44c\n * GO-2026-6330 CVE-2026-55764 GHSA-mrpp-v6pg-p54x\n * GO-2026-6333 CVE-2026-25712 GHSA-37w2-86g3-h4qh\n * GO-2026-6334 CVE-2026-24690 GHSA-47rq-xp99-92mx\n * GO-2026-6335 CVE-2026-27657 GHSA-4c8f-3m6h-m56r\n * GO-2026-6336 CVE-2026-26232 GHSA-5v69-g2m3-3hq3\n * GO-2026-6337 CVE-2026-28705 GHSA-7jvx-g65v-r899\n * GO-2026-6338 CVE-2026-22547 GHSA-922f-hfwp-p56f\n * GO-2026-6339 CVE-2026-20909 GHSA-fhq3-p242-2qpf\n * GO-2026-6340 CVE-2026-25718 GHSA-h697-89cp-24q8\n * GO-2026-6341 CVE-2026-26307 GHSA-h9c5-x7g8-4q7f\n * GO-2026-6342 CVE-2026-26247 GHSA-m5ch-ppfx-xv3v\n * GO-2026-6354 CVE-2026-78662\n * GO-2026-6355 CVE-2026-56855\n\n- Update to version 0.0.20260828T144745 2026-08-28T14:47:45Z.\n\n * GO-2026-6303 CVE-2026-56854\n","status":"published","published":"2026-09-08T16:28:52Z","modified":"2026-09-29T18:23:12.805639295Z","updated_at":"2026-11-02T15:54:03.991985Z"}]}}