{"id":"CVE-2026-6554","aliases":["ALPINE-CVE-2026-6554","AZL-99747","AZL-99924","BELL-CVE-2026-6554","DEBIAN-CVE-2026-6554","EUVD-2026-72019","GHSA-2c9f-8whq-v3fc","MGASA-2026-0416","OESA-2026-3988","OESA-2026-3989","OESA-2026-3990","OESA-2026-3991","OESA-2026-4100","SUSE-SU-2026:23737-1","SUSE-SU-2026:23829-1","SUSE-SU-2026:23892-1","SUSE-SU-2026:23907-1","SUSE-SU-2026:4188-1","SUSE-SU-2026:4194-1","SUSE-SU-2026:4195-1","SUSE-SU-2026:4239-1","UBUNTU-CVE-2026-6554","openSUSE-SU-2026:11744-1","openSUSE-SU-2026:21940-1"],"status":"published","title":"infinte loop in libpcap before 1.10.7","description":"libpcap BPF interpreter treats the offset in the 'ja L' BPF instruction as a signed integer to implement looping via backward jumps, but it does not limit the number of loop iterations.  A crafted filter program or the 'protochain' primitive used on a crafted network packet can cause the interpreter to loop infinitely.","severity":{"version":"3.1","score":7.5,"vector":"CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H","level":"high","assessor":"cna","from":"cve"},"epss":{"day":"2026-11-09","score":0.0044,"percentile":0.38538,"model":"v2026.06.15"},"facts":{"in_kev":false,"known_exploited":false,"public_exploit":false,"fix_available":true},"cwes":["CWE-835"],"published":"2026-09-05T18:51:02Z","modified":"2026-10-28T20:17:48Z","fixes":[{"ecosystem":"Alpine:v3.21","package":"libpcap","fixed_in":["1.10.7-r0"],"sources":["osv"]},{"ecosystem":"Alpine:v3.22","package":"libpcap","fixed_in":["1.10.7-r0"],"sources":["osv"]},{"ecosystem":"Alpine:v3.23","package":"libpcap","fixed_in":["1.10.7-r0"],"sources":["osv"]},{"ecosystem":"Alpine:v3.24","package":"libpcap","fixed_in":["1.10.7-r0"],"sources":["osv"]},{"ecosystem":"Azure Linux:3","package":"libpcap","fixed_in":["1.10.7-1"],"sources":["osv"]},{"ecosystem":"Alpaquita:23","package":"libpcap","fixed_in":["1.10.7-r0"],"sources":["osv"]},{"ecosystem":"Alpaquita:25","package":"libpcap","fixed_in":["1.10.7-r0"],"sources":["osv"]},{"ecosystem":"Alpaquita:stream","package":"libpcap","fixed_in":["1.10.7-r0"],"sources":["osv"]},{"ecosystem":"Debian:14","package":"libpcap","fixed_in":["1.10.7-1"],"sources":["osv"]}],"affected":[{"source":"osv","ecosystem":"Alpine:v3.21","package":"libpcap","ranges":[{"type":"ECOSYSTEM","events":[{"introduced":"0"},{"fixed":"1.10.7-r0"}]}]},{"source":"osv","ecosystem":"Alpine:v3.22","package":"libpcap","ranges":[{"type":"ECOSYSTEM","events":[{"introduced":"0"},{"fixed":"1.10.7-r0"}]}]},{"source":"osv","ecosystem":"Alpine:v3.23","package":"libpcap","ranges":[{"type":"ECOSYSTEM","events":[{"introduced":"0"},{"fixed":"1.10.7-r0"}]}]},{"source":"osv","ecosystem":"Alpine:v3.24","package":"libpcap","ranges":[{"type":"ECOSYSTEM","events":[{"introduced":"0"},{"fixed":"1.10.7-r0"}]}]},{"source":"osv","ecosystem":"Azure Linux:3","package":"libpcap","ranges":[{"type":"ECOSYSTEM","events":[{"introduced":"0"},{"fixed":"1.10.7-1"}]}]},{"source":"osv","ecosystem":"Azure Linux:3","package":"nmap","ranges":[{"type":"ECOSYSTEM","events":[{"introduced":"0"},{"last_affected":"7.95-5"}]}]},{"source":"osv","ecosystem":"Alpaquita:23","package":"libpcap","ranges":[{"type":"ECOSYSTEM","events":[{"introduced":"1.10.1-r0"},{"fixed":"1.10.7-r0"}]}]},{"source":"osv","ecosystem":"Alpaquita:25","package":"libpcap","ranges":[{"type":"ECOSYSTEM","events":[{"introduced":"1.10.5-r0"},{"fixed":"1.10.7-r0"}]}]},{"source":"osv","ecosystem":"Alpaquita:stream","package":"libpcap","ranges":[{"type":"ECOSYSTEM","events":[{"introduced":"1.10.1-r0"},{"fixed":"1.10.7-r0"}]}]},{"source":"osv","ecosystem":"Debian:12","package":"libpcap","ranges":[{"type":"ECOSYSTEM","events":[{"introduced":"0"}]}],"versions":["1.10.3-1","1.10.4-1","1.10.4-2","1.10.4-3","1.10.4-4","1.10.4-4.1","1.10.4-4.1~exp1","1.10.4-5","1.10.4-5+hurd.1","1.10.5-1","1.10.5-2","1.10.6-1","1.10.6-2","1.10.7-1","1.11.0-1"]},{"source":"osv","ecosystem":"Debian:13","package":"libpcap","ranges":[{"type":"ECOSYSTEM","events":[{"introduced":"0"}]}],"versions":["1.10.5-2","1.10.6-1","1.10.6-2","1.10.7-1","1.11.0-1"]},{"source":"osv","ecosystem":"Debian:14","package":"libpcap","ranges":[{"type":"ECOSYSTEM","events":[{"introduced":"0"},{"fixed":"1.10.7-1"}]}],"versions":["1.10.5-2","1.10.6-1","1.10.6-2"]},{"source":"osv","ecosystem":"Mageia:10","package":"libpcap","ranges":[{"type":"ECOSYSTEM","events":[{"introduced":"0"},{"fixed":"1.10.7-1.mga10"}]}],"bundled":7},{"source":"osv","ecosystem":"Mageia:9","package":"libpcap","ranges":[{"type":"ECOSYSTEM","events":[{"introduced":"0"},{"fixed":"1.10.7-1.mga9"}]}],"bundled":7},{"source":"osv","ecosystem":"openEuler:24.03-LTS-SP3","package":"libpcap","ranges":[{"type":"ECOSYSTEM","events":[{"introduced":"0"},{"fixed":"1.10.4-6.oe2403sp3"}]}],"bundled":7},{"source":"osv","ecosystem":"openEuler:20.03-LTS-SP4","package":"libpcap","ranges":[{"type":"ECOSYSTEM","events":[{"introduced":"0"},{"fixed":"1.9.1-9.oe2003sp4"}]}],"bundled":7},{"source":"osv","ecosystem":"openEuler:22.03-LTS-SP4","package":"libpcap","ranges":[{"type":"ECOSYSTEM","events":[{"introduced":"0"},{"fixed":"1.10.3-5.oe2203sp4"}]}],"bundled":7},{"source":"osv","ecosystem":"openEuler:24.03-LTS-SP1","package":"libpcap","ranges":[{"type":"ECOSYSTEM","events":[{"introduced":"0"},{"fixed":"1.10.4-6.oe2403sp1"}]}],"bundled":7},{"source":"osv","ecosystem":"openEuler:24.03-LTS-SP4","package":"libpcap","ranges":[{"type":"ECOSYSTEM","events":[{"introduced":"0"},{"fixed":"1.10.4-6.oe2403sp4"}]}],"bundled":7},{"source":"osv","ecosystem":"SUSE:Linux Micro 6.1","package":"libpcap","ranges":[{"type":"ECOSYSTEM","events":[{"introduced":"0"},{"fixed":"1.10.4-slfo.1.1_3.1"}]}],"bundled":7},{"source":"osv","ecosystem":"SUSE:Linux Micro 6.0","package":"libpcap","ranges":[{"type":"ECOSYSTEM","events":[{"introduced":"0"},{"fixed":"1.10.4-5.1"}]}],"bundled":7},{"source":"osv","ecosystem":"SUSE:Linux Micro 6.2","package":"libpcap","ranges":[{"type":"ECOSYSTEM","events":[{"introduced":"0"},{"fixed":"1.10.5-160000.5.1"}]}],"bundled":7},{"source":"osv","ecosystem":"SUSE:Linux Enterprise Server 16.0","package":"libpcap","ranges":[{"type":"ECOSYSTEM","events":[{"introduced":"0"},{"fixed":"1.10.5-160000.5.1"}]}],"bundled":7},{"source":"osv","ecosystem":"SUSE:Linux Enterprise Server for SAP applications 16.0","package":"libpcap","ranges":[{"type":"ECOSYSTEM","events":[{"introduced":"0"},{"fixed":"1.10.5-160000.5.1"}]}],"bundled":7},{"source":"osv","ecosystem":"SUSE:Linux Enterprise Module for Basesystem 15 SP7","package":"libpcap","ranges":[{"type":"ECOSYSTEM","events":[{"introduced":"0"},{"fixed":"1.10.5-150700.3.13.1"}]}],"bundled":7},{"source":"osv","ecosystem":"SUSE:Linux Enterprise Module for Package Hub 15 SP7","package":"libpcap","ranges":[{"type":"ECOSYSTEM","events":[{"introduced":"0"},{"fixed":"1.10.5-150700.3.13.1"}]}],"bundled":7},{"source":"osv","ecosystem":"SUSE:Linux Enterprise Server 15 SP6-LTSS","package":"libpcap","ranges":[{"type":"ECOSYSTEM","events":[{"introduced":"0"},{"fixed":"1.10.4-150600.3.12.1"}]}],"bundled":7},{"source":"osv","ecosystem":"SUSE:Linux Enterprise Server for SAP Applications 15 SP6","package":"libpcap","ranges":[{"type":"ECOSYSTEM","events":[{"introduced":"0"},{"fixed":"1.10.4-150600.3.12.1"}]}],"bundled":7},{"source":"osv","ecosystem":"SUSE:Linux Enterprise Micro 5.3","package":"libpcap","ranges":[{"type":"ECOSYSTEM","events":[{"introduced":"0"},{"fixed":"1.10.1-150400.3.12.1"}]}],"bundled":7},{"source":"osv","ecosystem":"SUSE:Linux Enterprise Micro 5.4","package":"libpcap","ranges":[{"type":"ECOSYSTEM","events":[{"introduced":"0"},{"fixed":"1.10.1-150400.3.12.1"}]}],"bundled":7},{"source":"osv","ecosystem":"SUSE:Linux Enterprise Micro 5.5","package":"libpcap","ranges":[{"type":"ECOSYSTEM","events":[{"introduced":"0"},{"fixed":"1.10.1-150400.3.12.1"}]}],"bundled":7},{"source":"osv","ecosystem":"SUSE:Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 15 SP4-ESPOS","package":"libpcap","ranges":[{"type":"ECOSYSTEM","events":[{"introduced":"0"},{"fixed":"1.10.1-150400.3.12.1"}]}],"bundled":7},{"source":"osv","ecosystem":"SUSE:Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 15 SP4-LTSS","package":"libpcap","ranges":[{"type":"ECOSYSTEM","events":[{"introduced":"0"},{"fixed":"1.10.1-150400.3.12.1"}]}],"bundled":7},{"source":"osv","ecosystem":"SUSE:Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 15 SP5-ESPOS","package":"libpcap","ranges":[{"type":"ECOSYSTEM","events":[{"introduced":"0"},{"fixed":"1.10.1-150400.3.12.1"}]}],"bundled":7},{"source":"osv","ecosystem":"SUSE:Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 15 SP5-LTSS","package":"libpcap","ranges":[{"type":"ECOSYSTEM","events":[{"introduced":"0"},{"fixed":"1.10.1-150400.3.12.1"}]}],"bundled":7},{"source":"osv","ecosystem":"SUSE:Linux Enterprise Server 15 SP4-LTSS","package":"libpcap","ranges":[{"type":"ECOSYSTEM","events":[{"introduced":"0"},{"fixed":"1.10.1-150400.3.12.1"}]}],"bundled":7},{"source":"osv","ecosystem":"SUSE:Linux Enterprise Server 15 SP5-LTSS","package":"libpcap","ranges":[{"type":"ECOSYSTEM","events":[{"introduced":"0"},{"fixed":"1.10.1-150400.3.12.1"}]}],"bundled":7},{"source":"osv","ecosystem":"SUSE:Linux Enterprise Server for SAP Applications 15 SP4","package":"libpcap","ranges":[{"type":"ECOSYSTEM","events":[{"introduced":"0"},{"fixed":"1.10.1-150400.3.12.1"}]}],"bundled":7},{"source":"osv","ecosystem":"SUSE:Linux Enterprise Server for SAP Applications 15 SP5","package":"libpcap","ranges":[{"type":"ECOSYSTEM","events":[{"introduced":"0"},{"fixed":"1.10.1-150400.3.12.1"}]}],"bundled":7},{"source":"osv","ecosystem":"SUSE:Linux Enterprise Server 12 SP5-LTSS","package":"libpcap","ranges":[{"type":"ECOSYSTEM","events":[{"introduced":"0"},{"fixed":"1.8.1-10.12.1"}]}],"bundled":6},{"source":"osv","ecosystem":"SUSE:Linux Enterprise Server LTSS Extended Security 12 SP5","package":"libpcap","ranges":[{"type":"ECOSYSTEM","events":[{"introduced":"0"},{"fixed":"1.8.1-10.12.1"}]}],"bundled":6},{"source":"osv","ecosystem":"Ubuntu:Pro:14.04:LTS","package":"libpcap","ranges":[{"type":"ECOSYSTEM","events":[{"introduced":"0"}]}],"versions":["1.4.0-2","1.5.1-1","1.5.2-1","1.5.3-1","1.5.3-2","1.5.3-2ubuntu0.1","1.5.3-2ubuntu0.1+esm1"]},{"source":"osv","ecosystem":"Ubuntu:Pro:16.04:LTS","package":"libpcap","ranges":[{"type":"ECOSYSTEM","events":[{"introduced":"0"}]}],"versions":["1.7.4-1","1.7.4-2","1.7.4-2ubuntu0.1","1.7.4-2ubuntu0.1+esm1"]},{"source":"osv","ecosystem":"Ubuntu:Pro:18.04:LTS","package":"libpcap","ranges":[{"type":"ECOSYSTEM","events":[{"introduced":"0"}]}],"versions":["1.8.1-5ubuntu1","1.8.1-6ubuntu1","1.8.1-6ubuntu1.18.04.1","1.8.1-6ubuntu1.18.04.2","1.8.1-6ubuntu1.18.04.2+esm1"]},{"source":"osv","ecosystem":"Ubuntu:Pro:20.04:LTS","package":"libpcap","ranges":[{"type":"ECOSYSTEM","events":[{"introduced":"0"}]}],"versions":["1.9.1-2","1.9.1-3","1.9.1-3ubuntu1.20.04.1","1.9.1-3ubuntu1.20.04.1+esm1"]},{"source":"osv","ecosystem":"Ubuntu:22.04:LTS","package":"libpcap","ranges":[{"type":"ECOSYSTEM","events":[{"introduced":"0"}]}],"versions":["1.10.0-2build1","1.10.1-4","1.10.1-4build1","1.10.1-4ubuntu1.22.04.1","1.10.1-4ubuntu1.22.04.2"]},{"source":"osv","ecosystem":"Ubuntu:24.04:LTS","package":"libpcap","ranges":[{"type":"ECOSYSTEM","events":[{"introduced":"0"}]}],"versions":["1.10.4-4","1.10.4-4ubuntu3","1.10.4-4.1ubuntu2","1.10.4-4.1ubuntu3","1.10.4-4.1ubuntu3.1"]},{"source":"osv","ecosystem":"Ubuntu:26.10","package":"libpcap","ranges":[{"type":"ECOSYSTEM","events":[{"introduced":"0"}]}],"versions":["1.10.6-1ubuntu1","1.10.6-2ubuntu1","1.10.7-1ubuntu1"]},{"source":"osv","ecosystem":"Ubuntu:26.04:LTS","package":"libpcap","ranges":[{"type":"ECOSYSTEM","events":[{"introduced":"0"}]}],"versions":["1.10.5-2ubuntu2","1.10.5-2ubuntu3","1.10.6-1ubuntu1","1.10.6-1ubuntu1.1"]},{"source":"osv","ecosystem":"openSUSE:Tumbleweed","package":"libpcap","ranges":[{"type":"ECOSYSTEM","events":[{"introduced":"0"},{"fixed":"1.10.7-1.1"}]}],"bundled":7},{"source":"osv","ecosystem":"openSUSE:Leap 16.0","package":"libpcap","ranges":[{"type":"ECOSYSTEM","events":[{"introduced":"0"},{"fixed":"1.10.5-160000.5.1"}]}],"bundled":7}],"products":[{"vendor":"the tcpdump group","product":"libpcap"}],"references":[{"url":"https://github.com/the-tcpdump-group/libpcap/commit/ff3c83475ac303c6b681c52ad0b6e14795a8e0ce","tags":["patch","fix"]},{"url":"http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2026/10/22/3","tags":["web"]},{"url":"https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-6554","tags":["web","advisory"]},{"url":"https://github.com/advisories/GHSA-2c9f-8whq-v3fc"},{"url":"https://security.alpinelinux.org/vuln/CVE-2026-6554","tags":["advisory"]},{"url":"https://docs.bell-sw.com/security/cves/CVE-2026-6554","tags":["advisory"]},{"url":"https://github.com/the-tcpdump-group/libpcap/","tags":["web"]},{"url":"https://github.com/CVEProject/cvelistV5/tree/main/cves/2026/6xxx/CVE-2026-6554.json","tags":["advisory"]},{"url":"https://security-tracker.debian.org/tracker/CVE-2026-6554","tags":["advisory"]},{"url":"https://advisories.mageia.org/MGASA-2026-0416.html","tags":["advisory"]},{"url":"https://bugs.mageia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=36286","tags":["report"]},{"url":"https://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2026/09/09/2","tags":["web"]},{"url":"https://www.openeuler.org/zh/security/security-bulletins/detail/?id=openEuler-SA-2026-3988","tags":["advisory"]},{"url":"https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-0799","tags":["advisory"]},{"url":"https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-18238","tags":["advisory"]},{"url":"https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-18313","tags":["advisory"]},{"url":"https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-31911","tags":["advisory"]},{"url":"https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-31912","tags":["advisory"]},{"url":"https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-6244","tags":["advisory"]},{"url":"https://www.openeuler.org/zh/security/security-bulletins/detail/?id=openEuler-SA-2026-3989","tags":["advisory"]},{"url":"https://www.openeuler.org/zh/security/security-bulletins/detail/?id=openEuler-SA-2026-3990","tags":["advisory"]},{"url":"https://www.openeuler.org/zh/security/security-bulletins/detail/?id=openEuler-SA-2026-3991","tags":["advisory"]},{"url":"https://www.openeuler.org/zh/security/security-bulletins/detail/?id=openEuler-SA-2026-4100","tags":["advisory"]},{"url":"https://www.suse.com/support/update/announcement/2026/suse-su-202623737-1/","tags":["advisory"]},{"url":"https://bugzilla.suse.com/1279584","tags":["report"]},{"url":"https://bugzilla.suse.com/1279588","tags":["report"]},{"url":"https://bugzilla.suse.com/1279593","tags":["report"]},{"url":"https://bugzilla.suse.com/1279595","tags":["report"]},{"url":"https://bugzilla.suse.com/1279782","tags":["report"]},{"url":"https://bugzilla.suse.com/1279783","tags":["report"]},{"url":"https://bugzilla.suse.com/1279784","tags":["report"]},{"url":"https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-0799","tags":["web"]},{"url":"https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-18238","tags":["web"]},{"url":"https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-18313","tags":["web"]},{"url":"https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-31911","tags":["web"]},{"url":"https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-31912","tags":["web"]},{"url":"https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-6244","tags":["web"]},{"url":"https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-6554","tags":["web"]},{"url":"https://www.suse.com/support/update/announcement/2026/suse-su-202623829-1/","tags":["advisory"]},{"url":"https://www.suse.com/support/update/announcement/2026/suse-su-202623892-1/","tags":["advisory"]},{"url":"https://www.suse.com/support/update/announcement/2026/suse-su-202623907-1/","tags":["advisory"]},{"url":"https://www.suse.com/support/update/announcement/2026/suse-su-20264188-1/","tags":["advisory"]},{"url":"https://www.suse.com/support/update/announcement/2026/suse-su-20264194-1/","tags":["advisory"]},{"url":"https://www.suse.com/support/update/announcement/2026/suse-su-20264195-1/","tags":["advisory"]},{"url":"https://www.suse.com/support/update/announcement/2026/suse-su-20264239-1/","tags":["advisory"]},{"url":"https://ubuntu.com/security/CVE-2026-6554","tags":["report"]},{"url":"https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-6554","tags":["report"]},{"url":"","tags":["advisory"]}],"sources":{"cve":[{"id":"CVE-2026-6554","title":"infinte loop in libpcap before 1.10.7","description":"libpcap BPF interpreter treats the offset in the 'ja L' BPF instruction as a signed integer to implement looping via backward jumps, but it does not limit the number of loop iterations.  A crafted filter program or the 'protochain' primitive used on a crafted network packet can cause the interpreter to loop infinitely.","status":"published","published":"2026-09-05T18:51:02.338Z","modified":"2026-10-22T20:08:13.106Z","cvss":[{"version":"3.1","score":7.5,"vector":"CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H","level":"high","assessor":"cna"}],"cwes":["CWE-835"],"updated_at":"2026-11-02T13:50:04.986624Z"}],"euvd":[{"id":"EUVD-2026-72019","description":"libpcap BPF interpreter treats the offset in the 'ja L' BPF instruction as a signed integer to implement looping via backward jumps, but it does not limit the number of loop iterations.  A crafted filter program or the 'protochain' primitive used on a crafted network packet can cause the interpreter to loop infinitely.","status":"published","published":"2026-09-05T18:51:02Z","modified":"2026-10-22T20:08:13Z","cvss":[{"version":"3.1","score":7.5,"vector":"CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H","level":"high"}],"updated_at":"2026-11-02T16:59:34.021826Z"}],"ghsa":[{"id":"GHSA-2c9f-8whq-v3fc","title":"libpcap BPF interpreter treats the offset in the 'ja L' BPF instruction as a signed integer to...","description":"libpcap BPF interpreter treats the offset in the 'ja L' BPF instruction as a signed integer to implement looping via backward jumps, but it does not limit the number of loop iterations.  In particular uncommon use cases a crafted filter program can cause the interpreter to loop infinitely.","status":"published","published":"2026-09-05T21:31:19Z","modified":"2026-10-22T21:33:33Z","cvss":[{"version":"3.1","score":5.5,"vector":"CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H","level":"medium"}],"cwes":["CWE-835"],"updated_at":"2026-11-02T15:14:18.215402Z"}],"nvd":[{"id":"CVE-2026-6554","description":"libpcap BPF interpreter treats the offset in the 'ja L' BPF instruction as a signed integer to implement looping via backward jumps, but it does not limit the number of loop iterations.  A crafted filter program or the 'protochain' primitive used on a crafted network packet can cause the interpreter to loop infinitely.","status":"published","published":"2026-09-05T19:16:56.067Z","modified":"2026-10-22T21:17:21.727Z","cvss":[{"version":"3.1","score":7.5,"vector":"CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H","level":"high","assessor":"secondary"}],"cwes":["CWE-835"],"updated_at":"2026-11-02T14:12:44.082631Z"}],"osv":[{"id":"ALPINE-CVE-2026-6554","description":"libpcap BPF interpreter treats the offset in the 'ja L' BPF instruction as a signed integer to implement looping via backward jumps, but it does not limit the number of loop iterations.  A crafted filter program or the 'protochain' primitive used on a crafted network packet can cause the interpreter to loop infinitely.","status":"published","published":"2026-09-05T19:16:56.067Z","modified":"2026-10-23T18:30:03.310592005Z","cvss":[{"version":"3.1","score":7.5,"vector":"CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H","level":"high"}],"updated_at":"2026-11-02T15:27:50.764331Z"},{"id":"BELL-CVE-2026-6554","status":"published","published":"2026-09-08T06:05:24.251852Z","modified":"2026-10-28T07:15:04.460953661Z","cvss":[{"version":"3.1","score":7.5,"vector":"CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H","level":"high"}],"updated_at":"2026-11-02T15:28:25.231222Z"},{"id":"CVE-2026-6554","title":"infinte loop in libpcap before 1.10.7","description":"libpcap BPF interpreter treats the offset in the 'ja L' BPF instruction as a signed integer to implement looping via backward jumps, but it does not limit the number of loop iterations.  A crafted filter program or the 'protochain' primitive used on a crafted network packet can cause the interpreter to loop infinitely.","status":"published","published":"2026-09-05T18:51:02.338Z","modified":"2026-10-28T11:01:21.602318801Z","cvss":[{"version":"3.1","score":7.5,"vector":"CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H","level":"high"}],"cwes":["CWE-835"],"updated_at":"2026-11-02T15:45:14.096824Z"},{"id":"DEBIAN-CVE-2026-6554","description":"libpcap BPF interpreter treats the offset in the 'ja L' BPF instruction as a signed integer to implement looping via backward jumps, but it does not limit the number of loop iterations.  A crafted filter program or the 'protochain' primitive used on a crafted network packet can cause the interpreter to loop infinitely.","status":"published","published":"2026-09-05T19:16:56.067Z","modified":"2026-10-23T18:05:41.210452139Z","cvss":[{"version":"3.1","score":7.5,"vector":"CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H","level":"high"}],"updated_at":"2026-11-02T15:45:58.699079Z"},{"id":"OESA-2026-3988","title":"libpcap security update","description":"This is the official web site of tcpdump, a powerful command-line  packet analyzer; and libpcap, a portable C/C++ library for  network traffic capture.\r\n\r\nSecurity Fix(es):\n\nIn BPF instructions that load/store a value from/to a scratch memory register the register index is an unsigned 32-bit integer and must not exceed 15, but libpcap BPF interpreter does not validate the value. In particular uncommon use cases a crafted filter program can cause the interpreter to try reading and writing the OS process memory in the 16GiB starting at the current stack frame on 64-bit architectures and in the entire address space on 32-bit architectures.(CVE-2026-0799)\n\nThe rpcap client code that processes a RPCAP_MSG_PACKET message received from the server incorrectly validates its headers. A malicious server can send a crafted message and cause the client to treat up to 20 bytes of the client process memory beyond the end of the buffer as if it was a part of the captured packet.(CVE-2026-18238)\n\nrpcapd can allocate up to 65536 bytes per each RPCAP_MSG_UPDATEFILTER_REQ or RPCAP_MSG_STARTCAP_REQ message received from the client, but it never frees the memory, so it leaks memory even under normal use. A malicious client can cause the server to leak memory substantially faster.(CVE-2026-18313)\n\nlibpcap BPF interpreter calls abort() if it encounters a BPF instruction that has an invalid opcode. In particular uncommon use cases a crafted filter program can terminate the OS process.(CVE-2026-31911)\n\nlibpcap BPF interpreter detects neither reaching the end of the filter program buffer due to lack of a return instruction nor executing a jump instruction with an offset that translates to a pointer outside of the buffer. In particular uncommon use cases a crafted filter program can cause the interpreter to try reading the OS process memory in the 32GiB around the buffer on 64-bit architectures and in the entire address space on 32-bit architectures.(CVE-2026-31912)\n\nlibpcap BPF interpreter for the \u0026apos;div #k\u0026apos; and \u0026apos;mod #k\u0026apos; ALU instructions does not check whether the immediate value is zero. In particular uncommon use cases a crafted filter program can cause a division by zero.(CVE-2026-6244)\n\nlibpcap BPF interpreter treats the offset in the \u0026apos;ja L\u0026apos; BPF instruction as a signed integer to implement looping via backward jumps, but it does not limit the number of loop iterations. In particular uncommon use cases a crafted filter program can cause the interpreter to loop infinitely.(CVE-2026-6554)","status":"published","published":"2026-09-20T13:23:52Z","modified":"2026-09-20T13:30:28.281579864Z","cvss":[{"version":"3.1","score":8.7,"vector":"CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:H/A:H","level":"high"}],"updated_at":"2026-11-02T15:52:47.643553Z"},{"id":"OESA-2026-3989","title":"libpcap security update","description":"This is the official web site of tcpdump, a powerful command-line  packet analyzer; and libpcap, a portable C/C++ library for  network traffic capture.\r\n\r\nSecurity Fix(es):\n\nIn BPF instructions that load/store a value from/to a scratch memory register the register index is an unsigned 32-bit integer and must not exceed 15, but libpcap BPF interpreter does not validate the value. In particular uncommon use cases a crafted filter program can cause the interpreter to try reading and writing the OS process memory in the 16GiB starting at the current stack frame on 64-bit architectures and in the entire address space on 32-bit architectures.(CVE-2026-0799)\n\nThe rpcap client code that processes a RPCAP_MSG_PACKET message received from the server incorrectly validates its headers. A malicious server can send a crafted message and cause the client to treat up to 20 bytes of the client process memory beyond the end of the buffer as if it was a part of the captured packet.(CVE-2026-18238)\n\nrpcapd can allocate up to 65536 bytes per each RPCAP_MSG_UPDATEFILTER_REQ or RPCAP_MSG_STARTCAP_REQ message received from the client, but it never frees the memory, so it leaks memory even under normal use. A malicious client can cause the server to leak memory substantially faster.(CVE-2026-18313)\n\nlibpcap BPF interpreter calls abort() if it encounters a BPF instruction that has an invalid opcode. In particular uncommon use cases a crafted filter program can terminate the OS process.(CVE-2026-31911)\n\nlibpcap BPF interpreter detects neither reaching the end of the filter program buffer due to lack of a return instruction nor executing a jump instruction with an offset that translates to a pointer outside of the buffer. In particular uncommon use cases a crafted filter program can cause the interpreter to try reading the OS process memory in the 32GiB around the buffer on 64-bit architectures and in the entire address space on 32-bit architectures.(CVE-2026-31912)\n\nlibpcap BPF interpreter for the \u0026apos;div #k\u0026apos; and \u0026apos;mod #k\u0026apos; ALU instructions does not check whether the immediate value is zero. In particular uncommon use cases a crafted filter program can cause a division by zero.(CVE-2026-6244)\n\nlibpcap BPF interpreter treats the offset in the \u0026apos;ja L\u0026apos; BPF instruction as a signed integer to implement looping via backward jumps, but it does not limit the number of loop iterations. In particular uncommon use cases a crafted filter program can cause the interpreter to loop infinitely.(CVE-2026-6554)","status":"published","published":"2026-09-20T13:23:53Z","modified":"2026-09-20T13:30:32.005118739Z","cvss":[{"version":"3.1","score":8.7,"vector":"CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:H/A:H","level":"high"}],"updated_at":"2026-11-02T15:52:47.643553Z"},{"id":"OESA-2026-3990","title":"libpcap security update","description":"This is the official web site of tcpdump, a powerful command-line  packet analyzer; and libpcap, a portable C/C++ library for  network traffic capture.\r\n\r\nSecurity Fix(es):\n\nIn BPF instructions that load/store a value from/to a scratch memory register the register index is an unsigned 32-bit integer and must not exceed 15, but libpcap BPF interpreter does not validate the value. In particular uncommon use cases a crafted filter program can cause the interpreter to try reading and writing the OS process memory in the 16GiB starting at the current stack frame on 64-bit architectures and in the entire address space on 32-bit architectures.(CVE-2026-0799)\n\nThe rpcap client code that processes a RPCAP_MSG_PACKET message received from the server incorrectly validates its headers. A malicious server can send a crafted message and cause the client to treat up to 20 bytes of the client process memory beyond the end of the buffer as if it was a part of the captured packet.(CVE-2026-18238)\n\nrpcapd can allocate up to 65536 bytes per each RPCAP_MSG_UPDATEFILTER_REQ or RPCAP_MSG_STARTCAP_REQ message received from the client, but it never frees the memory, so it leaks memory even under normal use. A malicious client can cause the server to leak memory substantially faster.(CVE-2026-18313)\n\nlibpcap BPF interpreter calls abort() if it encounters a BPF instruction that has an invalid opcode. In particular uncommon use cases a crafted filter program can terminate the OS process.(CVE-2026-31911)\n\nlibpcap BPF interpreter detects neither reaching the end of the filter program buffer due to lack of a return instruction nor executing a jump instruction with an offset that translates to a pointer outside of the buffer. In particular uncommon use cases a crafted filter program can cause the interpreter to try reading the OS process memory in the 32GiB around the buffer on 64-bit architectures and in the entire address space on 32-bit architectures.(CVE-2026-31912)\n\nlibpcap BPF interpreter for the \u0026apos;div #k\u0026apos; and \u0026apos;mod #k\u0026apos; ALU instructions does not check whether the immediate value is zero. In particular uncommon use cases a crafted filter program can cause a division by zero.(CVE-2026-6244)\n\nlibpcap BPF interpreter treats the offset in the \u0026apos;ja L\u0026apos; BPF instruction as a signed integer to implement looping via backward jumps, but it does not limit the number of loop iterations. In particular uncommon use cases a crafted filter program can cause the interpreter to loop infinitely.(CVE-2026-6554)","status":"published","published":"2026-09-20T13:23:54Z","modified":"2026-09-20T13:30:32.103261865Z","cvss":[{"version":"3.1","score":8.7,"vector":"CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:H/A:H","level":"high"}],"updated_at":"2026-11-02T15:52:47.643553Z"},{"id":"OESA-2026-3991","title":"libpcap security update","description":"This is the official web site of tcpdump, a powerful command-line  packet analyzer; and libpcap, a portable C/C++ library for  network traffic capture.\r\n\r\nSecurity Fix(es):\n\nIn BPF instructions that load/store a value from/to a scratch memory register the register index is an unsigned 32-bit integer and must not exceed 15, but libpcap BPF interpreter does not validate the value. In particular uncommon use cases a crafted filter program can cause the interpreter to try reading and writing the OS process memory in the 16GiB starting at the current stack frame on 64-bit architectures and in the entire address space on 32-bit architectures.(CVE-2026-0799)\n\nThe rpcap client code that processes a RPCAP_MSG_PACKET message received from the server incorrectly validates its headers. A malicious server can send a crafted message and cause the client to treat up to 20 bytes of the client process memory beyond the end of the buffer as if it was a part of the captured packet.(CVE-2026-18238)\n\nrpcapd can allocate up to 65536 bytes per each RPCAP_MSG_UPDATEFILTER_REQ or RPCAP_MSG_STARTCAP_REQ message received from the client, but it never frees the memory, so it leaks memory even under normal use. A malicious client can cause the server to leak memory substantially faster.(CVE-2026-18313)\n\nlibpcap BPF interpreter calls abort() if it encounters a BPF instruction that has an invalid opcode. In particular uncommon use cases a crafted filter program can terminate the OS process.(CVE-2026-31911)\n\nlibpcap BPF interpreter detects neither reaching the end of the filter program buffer due to lack of a return instruction nor executing a jump instruction with an offset that translates to a pointer outside of the buffer. In particular uncommon use cases a crafted filter program can cause the interpreter to try reading the OS process memory in the 32GiB around the buffer on 64-bit architectures and in the entire address space on 32-bit architectures.(CVE-2026-31912)\n\nlibpcap BPF interpreter for the \u0026apos;div #k\u0026apos; and \u0026apos;mod #k\u0026apos; ALU instructions does not check whether the immediate value is zero. In particular uncommon use cases a crafted filter program can cause a division by zero.(CVE-2026-6244)\n\nlibpcap BPF interpreter treats the offset in the \u0026apos;ja L\u0026apos; BPF instruction as a signed integer to implement looping via backward jumps, but it does not limit the number of loop iterations. In particular uncommon use cases a crafted filter program can cause the interpreter to loop infinitely.(CVE-2026-6554)","status":"published","published":"2026-09-20T13:23:54Z","modified":"2026-09-20T13:30:32.111341734Z","cvss":[{"version":"3.1","score":8.7,"vector":"CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:H/A:H","level":"high"}],"updated_at":"2026-11-02T15:52:47.643553Z"},{"id":"OESA-2026-4100","title":"libpcap security update","description":"This is the official web site of tcpdump, a powerful command-line  packet analyzer; and libpcap, a portable C/C++ library for  network traffic capture.\r\n\r\nSecurity Fix(es):\n\nIn BPF instructions that load/store a value from/to a scratch memory register the register index is an unsigned 32-bit integer and must not exceed 15, but libpcap BPF interpreter does not validate the value. In particular uncommon use cases a crafted filter program can cause the interpreter to try reading and writing the OS process memory in the 16GiB starting at the current stack frame on 64-bit architectures and in the entire address space on 32-bit architectures.(CVE-2026-0799)\n\nThe rpcap client code that processes a RPCAP_MSG_PACKET message received from the server incorrectly validates its headers. A malicious server can send a crafted message and cause the client to treat up to 20 bytes of the client process memory beyond the end of the buffer as if it was a part of the captured packet.(CVE-2026-18238)\n\nrpcapd can allocate up to 65536 bytes per each RPCAP_MSG_UPDATEFILTER_REQ or RPCAP_MSG_STARTCAP_REQ message received from the client, but it never frees the memory, so it leaks memory even under normal use. A malicious client can cause the server to leak memory substantially faster.(CVE-2026-18313)\n\nlibpcap BPF interpreter calls abort() if it encounters a BPF instruction that has an invalid opcode. In particular uncommon use cases a crafted filter program can terminate the OS process.(CVE-2026-31911)\n\nlibpcap BPF interpreter detects neither reaching the end of the filter program buffer due to lack of a return instruction nor executing a jump instruction with an offset that translates to a pointer outside of the buffer. In particular uncommon use cases a crafted filter program can cause the interpreter to try reading the OS process memory in the 32GiB around the buffer on 64-bit architectures and in the entire address space on 32-bit architectures.(CVE-2026-31912)\n\nlibpcap BPF interpreter for the \u0026apos;div #k\u0026apos; and \u0026apos;mod #k\u0026apos; ALU instructions does not check whether the immediate value is zero. In particular uncommon use cases a crafted filter program can cause a division by zero.(CVE-2026-6244)\n\nlibpcap BPF interpreter treats the offset in the \u0026apos;ja L\u0026apos; BPF instruction as a signed integer to implement looping via backward jumps, but it does not limit the number of loop iterations. In particular uncommon use cases a crafted filter program can cause the interpreter to loop infinitely.(CVE-2026-6554)","status":"published","published":"2026-09-25T01:28:24Z","modified":"2026-09-25T01:45:08.80515063Z","cvss":[{"version":"3.1","score":8.7,"vector":"CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:H/A:H","level":"high"}],"updated_at":"2026-11-02T15:52:47.643553Z"},{"id":"UBUNTU-CVE-2026-6554","description":"libpcap BPF interpreter treats the offset in the 'ja L' BPF instruction as a signed integer to implement looping via backward jumps, but it does not limit the number of loop iterations.  A crafted filter program or the 'protochain' primitive used on a crafted network packet can cause the interpreter to loop infinitely.","status":"published","published":"2026-09-05T19:16:00Z","modified":"2026-10-28T20:17:48.416027163Z","cvss":[{"version":"3.1","score":7.5,"vector":"CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H","level":"high"}],"updated_at":"2026-11-02T16:56:53.710209Z"},{"id":"AZL-99747","title":"CVE-2026-6554 affecting package libpcap for versions less than 1.10.7-1","description":"libpcap BPF interpreter treats the offset in the 'ja L' BPF instruction as a signed integer to implement looping via backward jumps, but it does not limit the number of loop iterations.  A crafted filter program or the 'protochain' primitive used on a crafted network packet can cause the interpreter to loop infinitely.","status":"published","published":"2026-09-05T19:16:56Z","modified":"2026-10-23T14:17:39.578972565Z","updated_at":"2026-11-02T15:28:12.596039Z"},{"id":"AZL-99924","title":"CVE-2026-6554 affecting package nmap 7.95-5","description":"libpcap BPF interpreter treats the offset in the 'ja L' BPF instruction as a signed integer to implement looping via backward jumps, but it does not limit the number of loop iterations.  In particular uncommon use cases a crafted filter program can cause the interpreter to loop infinitely.","status":"published","published":"2026-09-05T19:16:56Z","modified":"2026-09-14T05:26:59Z","updated_at":"2026-11-02T15:28:12.886815Z"},{"id":"MGASA-2026-0416","title":"Updated libpcap packages fix security vulnerabilities","description":"OOBR and OOBW in libpcap before 1.10.7. (CVE-2026-0799)\nabort() in libpcap before 1.10.7 on an invalid BPF opcode.\n(CVE-2026-31911)\nOOBR in libpcap before 1.10.7. (CVE-2026-31912)\nDivision by zero in libpcap before 1.10.7. (CVE-2026-6244)\nInfinte loop in libpcap before 1.10.7. (CVE-2026-6554)\nrpcapd memory leak in libpcap before 1.10.7. (CVE-2026-18313)\nOOBR in rpcap client in libpcap before 1.10.7. (CVE-2026-18238)\n","status":"published","published":"2026-09-18T17:17:37Z","modified":"2026-09-18T17:42:29.592139771Z","updated_at":"2026-11-02T15:49:43.795591Z"},{"id":"openSUSE-SU-2026:11744-1","title":"libpcap-devel-1.10.7-1.1 on GA media","description":"These are all security issues fixed in the libpcap-devel-1.10.7-1.1 package on the GA media of openSUSE Tumbleweed.","status":"published","published":"2026-09-10T00:00:00Z","modified":"2026-09-11T18:23:07.967652367Z","updated_at":"2026-11-02T16:58:39.516824Z"},{"id":"openSUSE-SU-2026:21940-1","title":"Security update for libpcap","description":"This update for libpcap fixes the following issues:\n\n- CVE-2026-0799: the BPF interpreter does not validate values in BPF instructions that load/store a value from/to a\n  scratch memory register and allows for OOB access (bsc#1279782).\n- CVE-2026-6244: libpcap BPF interpreter for the 'div #k' and 'mod #k' ALU instructions does not check whether the\n  immediate value is zero. In particular uncommon use cases a crafted filter program can cause a division by zero\n  (bsc#1279595).\n- CVE-2026-6554: libpcap BPF interpreter treats the offset in the 'ja L' BPF instruction implements looping via backward\n  jumps, but it does not limit the number of loop iterations. Can cause infinite loop (bsc#1279584).\n- CVE-2026-18238: `rpcap` client code that processes a `RPCAP_MSG_PACKET` message received from the server incorrectly\n  validates its headers and allows for an OOB access (bsc#1279783).\n- CVE-2026-18313: `rpcapd` allocates up to 65536 bytes per each `RPCAP_MSG_UPDATEFILTER_REQ` or `RPCAP_MSG_STARTCAP_REQ`\n  message received from the client and never frees the memory (bsc#1279784).\n- CVE-2026-31911: libpcap BPF interpreter calls abort() if it encounters a BPF instruction that has an invalid opcode.\n  In particular uncommon use cases a crafted filter program can terminate the OS process (bsc#1279588).\n- CVE-2026-31912: libpcap BPF interpreter detects neither reaching the end of the filter program buffer due to lack of a\n  return instruction nor executing a jump instruction with an offset that translates to a pointer outside of the buff\n  (bsc#1279593).\n","status":"published","published":"2026-09-23T19:43:03Z","modified":"2026-09-25T18:23:14.230324877Z","updated_at":"2026-11-02T16:58:42.426393Z"},{"id":"SUSE-SU-2026:23737-1","title":"Security update for libpcap","description":"This update for libpcap fixes the following issues:\n\n- CVE-2026-0799: the BPF interpreter does not validate values in BPF instructions that load/store a value from/to a\n  scratch memory register and allows for OOB access (bsc#1279782).\n- CVE-2026-6244: libpcap BPF interpreter for the 'div #k' and 'mod #k' ALU instructions does not check whether the\n  immediate value is zero. In particular uncommon use cases a crafted filter program can cause a division by zero\n  (bsc#1279595).\n- CVE-2026-6554: libpcap BPF interpreter treats the offset in the 'ja L' BPF instruction implements looping via backward\n  jumps, but it does not limit the number of loop iterations. Can cause infinite loop (bsc#1279584).\n- CVE-2026-18238: `rpcap` client code that processes a `RPCAP_MSG_PACKET` message received from the server incorrectly\n  validates its headers and allows for an OOB access (bsc#1279783).\n- CVE-2026-18313: `rpcapd` allocates up to 65536 bytes per each `RPCAP_MSG_UPDATEFILTER_REQ` or `RPCAP_MSG_STARTCAP_REQ`\n  message received from the client and never frees the memory (bsc#1279784).\n- CVE-2026-31911: libpcap BPF interpreter calls abort() if it encounters a BPF instruction that has an invalid opcode.\n  In particular uncommon use cases a crafted filter program can terminate the OS process (bsc#1279588).\n- CVE-2026-31912: libpcap BPF interpreter detects neither reaching the end of the filter program buffer due to lack of a\n  return instruction nor executing a jump instruction with an offset that translates to a pointer outside of the buff\n  (bsc#1279593).\n","status":"published","published":"2026-09-14T15:19:47Z","modified":"2026-09-27T18:23:10.67290248Z","updated_at":"2026-11-02T15:54:03.991985Z"},{"id":"SUSE-SU-2026:23829-1","title":"Security update for libpcap","description":"This update for libpcap fixes the following issues:\n\n- CVE-2026-0799: the BPF interpreter does not validate values in BPF instructions that load/store a value from/to a\n  scratch memory register and allows for OOB access (bsc#1279782).\n- CVE-2026-6244: libpcap BPF interpreter for the 'div #k' and 'mod #k' ALU instructions does not check whether the\n  immediate value is zero. In particular uncommon use cases a crafted filter program can cause a division by zero\n  (bsc#1279595).\n- CVE-2026-6554: libpcap BPF interpreter treats the offset in the 'ja L' BPF instruction implements looping via backward\n  jumps, but it does not limit the number of loop iterations. Can cause infinite loop (bsc#1279584).\n- CVE-2026-18238: `rpcap` client code that processes a `RPCAP_MSG_PACKET` message received from the server incorrectly\n  validates its headers and allows for an OOB access (bsc#1279783).\n- CVE-2026-18313: `rpcapd` allocates up to 65536 bytes per each `RPCAP_MSG_UPDATEFILTER_REQ` or `RPCAP_MSG_STARTCAP_REQ`\n  message received from the client and never frees the memory (bsc#1279784).\n- CVE-2026-31911: libpcap BPF interpreter calls abort() if it encounters a BPF instruction that has an invalid opcode.\n  In particular uncommon use cases a crafted filter program can terminate the OS process (bsc#1279588).\n- CVE-2026-31912: libpcap BPF interpreter detects neither reaching the end of the filter program buffer due to lack of a\n  return instruction nor executing a jump instruction with an offset that translates to a pointer outside of the buff\n  (bsc#1279593).\n","status":"published","published":"2026-09-14T09:47:52Z","modified":"2026-09-27T18:23:14.389183959Z","updated_at":"2026-11-02T15:54:03.991985Z"},{"id":"SUSE-SU-2026:23892-1","title":"Security update for libpcap","description":"This update for libpcap fixes the following issues:\n\n- CVE-2026-0799: the BPF interpreter does not validate values in BPF instructions that load/store a value from/to a\n  scratch memory register and allows for OOB access (bsc#1279782).\n- CVE-2026-6244: libpcap BPF interpreter for the 'div #k' and 'mod #k' ALU instructions does not check whether the\n  immediate value is zero. In particular uncommon use cases a crafted filter program can cause a division by zero\n  (bsc#1279595).\n- CVE-2026-6554: libpcap BPF interpreter treats the offset in the 'ja L' BPF instruction implements looping via backward\n  jumps, but it does not limit the number of loop iterations. Can cause infinite loop (bsc#1279584).\n- CVE-2026-18238: `rpcap` client code that processes a `RPCAP_MSG_PACKET` message received from the server incorrectly\n  validates its headers and allows for an OOB access (bsc#1279783).\n- CVE-2026-18313: `rpcapd` allocates up to 65536 bytes per each `RPCAP_MSG_UPDATEFILTER_REQ` or `RPCAP_MSG_STARTCAP_REQ`\n  message received from the client and never frees the memory (bsc#1279784).\n- CVE-2026-31911: libpcap BPF interpreter calls abort() if it encounters a BPF instruction that has an invalid opcode.\n  In particular uncommon use cases a crafted filter program can terminate the OS process (bsc#1279588).\n- CVE-2026-31912: libpcap BPF interpreter detects neither reaching the end of the filter program buffer due to lack of a\n  return instruction nor executing a jump instruction with an offset that translates to a pointer outside of the buff\n  (bsc#1279593).\n","status":"published","published":"2026-09-23T19:44:23Z","modified":"2026-09-30T18:23:11.266030946Z","updated_at":"2026-11-02T15:54:03.991985Z"},{"id":"SUSE-SU-2026:23907-1","title":"Security update for libpcap","description":"This update for libpcap fixes the following issues:\n\n- CVE-2026-0799: the BPF interpreter does not validate values in BPF instructions that load/store a value from/to a\n  scratch memory register and allows for OOB access (bsc#1279782).\n- CVE-2026-6244: libpcap BPF interpreter for the 'div #k' and 'mod #k' ALU instructions does not check whether the\n  immediate value is zero. In particular uncommon use cases a crafted filter program can cause a division by zero\n  (bsc#1279595).\n- CVE-2026-6554: libpcap BPF interpreter treats the offset in the 'ja L' BPF instruction implements looping via backward\n  jumps, but it does not limit the number of loop iterations. Can cause infinite loop (bsc#1279584).\n- CVE-2026-18238: `rpcap` client code that processes a `RPCAP_MSG_PACKET` message received from the server incorrectly\n  validates its headers and allows for an OOB access (bsc#1279783).\n- CVE-2026-18313: `rpcapd` allocates up to 65536 bytes per each `RPCAP_MSG_UPDATEFILTER_REQ` or `RPCAP_MSG_STARTCAP_REQ`\n  message received from the client and never frees the memory (bsc#1279784).\n- CVE-2026-31911: libpcap BPF interpreter calls abort() if it encounters a BPF instruction that has an invalid opcode.\n  In particular uncommon use cases a crafted filter program can terminate the OS process (bsc#1279588).\n- CVE-2026-31912: libpcap BPF interpreter detects neither reaching the end of the filter program buffer due to lack of a\n  return instruction nor executing a jump instruction with an offset that translates to a pointer outside of the buff\n  (bsc#1279593).\n","status":"published","published":"2026-09-23T19:44:23Z","modified":"2026-09-30T18:23:12.229588256Z","updated_at":"2026-11-02T15:54:03.991985Z"},{"id":"SUSE-SU-2026:4188-1","title":"Security update for libpcap","description":"This update for libpcap fixes the following issues:\n\n- CVE-2026-0799: the BPF interpreter does not validate values in BPF instructions that load/store a value from/to a\n  scratch memory register and allows for OOB access (bsc#1279782).\n- CVE-2026-6244: libpcap BPF interpreter for the 'div #k' and 'mod #k' ALU instructions does not check whether the\n  immediate value is zero. In particular uncommon use cases a crafted filter program can cause a division by zero\n  (bsc#1279595).\n- CVE-2026-6554: libpcap BPF interpreter treats the offset in the 'ja L' BPF instruction implements looping via backward\n  jumps, but it does not limit the number of loop iterations. Can cause infinite loop (bsc#1279584).\n- CVE-2026-18238: `rpcap` client code that processes a `RPCAP_MSG_PACKET` message received from the server incorrectly\n  validates its headers and allows for an OOB access (bsc#1279783).\n- CVE-2026-18313: `rpcapd` allocates up to 65536 bytes per each `RPCAP_MSG_UPDATEFILTER_REQ` or `RPCAP_MSG_STARTCAP_REQ`\n  message received from the client and never frees the memory (bsc#1279784).\n- CVE-2026-31911: libpcap BPF interpreter calls abort() if it encounters a BPF instruction that has an invalid opcode.\n  In particular uncommon use cases a crafted filter program can terminate the OS process (bsc#1279588).\n- CVE-2026-31912: libpcap BPF interpreter detects neither reaching the end of the filter program buffer due to lack of a\n  return instruction nor executing a jump instruction with an offset that translates to a pointer outside of the buff\n  (bsc#1279593).\n","status":"published","published":"2026-09-15T12:33:16Z","modified":"2026-09-16T10:00:05.708757932Z","updated_at":"2026-11-02T15:54:05.392906Z"},{"id":"SUSE-SU-2026:4194-1","title":"Security update for libpcap","description":"This update for libpcap fixes the following issues:\n\n- CVE-2026-0799: the BPF interpreter does not validate values in BPF instructions that load/store a value from/to a\n  scratch memory register and allows for OOB access (bsc#1279782).\n- CVE-2026-6244: libpcap BPF interpreter for the 'div #k' and 'mod #k' ALU instructions does not check whether the\n  immediate value is zero. In particular uncommon use cases a crafted filter program can cause a division by zero\n  (bsc#1279595).\n- CVE-2026-6554: libpcap BPF interpreter treats the offset in the 'ja L' BPF instruction implements looping via backward\n  jumps, but it does not limit the number of loop iterations. Can cause infinite loop (bsc#1279584).\n- CVE-2026-18238: `rpcap` client code that processes a `RPCAP_MSG_PACKET` message received from the server incorrectly\n  validates its headers and allows for an OOB access (bsc#1279783).\n- CVE-2026-18313: `rpcapd` allocates up to 65536 bytes per each `RPCAP_MSG_UPDATEFILTER_REQ` or `RPCAP_MSG_STARTCAP_REQ`\n  message received from the client and never frees the memory (bsc#1279784).\n- CVE-2026-31911: libpcap BPF interpreter calls abort() if it encounters a BPF instruction that has an invalid opcode.\n  In particular uncommon use cases a crafted filter program can terminate the OS process (bsc#1279588).\n- CVE-2026-31912: libpcap BPF interpreter detects neither reaching the end of the filter program buffer due to lack of a\n  return instruction nor executing a jump instruction with an offset that translates to a pointer outside of the buff\n  (bsc#1279593).\n","status":"published","published":"2026-09-15T14:27:53Z","modified":"2026-09-16T10:00:05.694218156Z","updated_at":"2026-11-02T15:54:05.392906Z"},{"id":"SUSE-SU-2026:4195-1","title":"Security update for libpcap","description":"This update for libpcap fixes the following issues:\n\n- CVE-2026-0799: the BPF interpreter does not validate values in BPF instructions that load/store a value from/to a\n  scratch memory register and allows for OOB access (bsc#1279782).\n- CVE-2026-6244: libpcap BPF interpreter for the 'div #k' and 'mod #k' ALU instructions does not check whether the\n  immediate value is zero. In particular uncommon use cases a crafted filter program can cause a division by zero\n  (bsc#1279595).\n- CVE-2026-6554: libpcap BPF interpreter treats the offset in the 'ja L' BPF instruction implements looping via backward\n  jumps, but it does not limit the number of loop iterations. Can cause infinite loop (bsc#1279584).\n- CVE-2026-18238: `rpcap` client code that processes a `RPCAP_MSG_PACKET` message received from the server incorrectly\n  validates its headers and allows for an OOB access (bsc#1279783).\n- CVE-2026-18313: `rpcapd` allocates up to 65536 bytes per each `RPCAP_MSG_UPDATEFILTER_REQ` or `RPCAP_MSG_STARTCAP_REQ`\n  message received from the client and never frees the memory (bsc#1279784).\n- CVE-2026-31911: libpcap BPF interpreter calls abort() if it encounters a BPF instruction that has an invalid opcode.\n  In particular uncommon use cases a crafted filter program can terminate the OS process (bsc#1279588).\n- CVE-2026-31912: libpcap BPF interpreter detects neither reaching the end of the filter program buffer due to lack of a\n  return instruction nor executing a jump instruction with an offset that translates to a pointer outside of the buff\n  (bsc#1279593).\n","status":"published","published":"2026-09-15T14:28:54Z","modified":"2026-09-16T10:00:05.702909624Z","updated_at":"2026-11-02T15:54:05.392906Z"},{"id":"SUSE-SU-2026:4239-1","title":"Security update for libpcap","description":"This update for libpcap fixes the following issues:\n\n- CVE-2026-0799: the BPF interpreter does not validate values in BPF instructions that load/store a value from/to a\n  scratch memory register and allows for OOB access (bsc#1279782).\n- CVE-2026-6244: libpcap BPF interpreter for the 'div #k' and 'mod #k' ALU instructions does not check whether the\n  immediate value is zero. In particular uncommon use cases a crafted filter program can cause a division by zero\n  (bsc#1279595).\n- CVE-2026-6554: libpcap BPF interpreter treats the offset in the 'ja L' BPF instruction implements looping via backward\n  jumps, but it does not limit the number of loop iterations. Can cause infinite loop (bsc#1279584).\n- CVE-2026-18238: `rpcap` client code that processes a `RPCAP_MSG_PACKET` message received from the server incorrectly\n  validates its headers and allows for an OOB access (bsc#1279783).\n- CVE-2026-31911: libpcap BPF interpreter calls abort() if it encounters a BPF instruction that has an invalid opcode.\n  In particular uncommon use cases a crafted filter program can terminate the OS process (bsc#1279588).\n- CVE-2026-31912: libpcap BPF interpreter detects neither reaching the end of the filter program buffer due to lack of a\n  return instruction nor executing a jump instruction with an offset that translates to a pointer outside of the buff\n  (bsc#1279593).\n","status":"published","published":"2026-09-17T11:48:09Z","modified":"2026-09-17T18:23:12.797265686Z","updated_at":"2026-11-02T15:54:05.392906Z"}]}}