{"id":"CVE-2026-71324","aliases":["EUVD-2026-54288","GHSA-3ccp-42pg-hgv6","GO-2026-6201","SUSE-SU-2026:23625-1","openSUSE-SU-2026:21761-1"],"status":"published","title":"Traefik: Cross-user response poisoning via proxied CONNECT on Traefik's shared backend keep-alive pool","description":"Traefik is an open source HTTP reverse proxy and load balancer. Prior to 2.11.53, 3.6.24, and 3.7.9, Traefik's default HTTP reverse proxy forwards a plain HTTP/2 or HTTP/3 CONNECT request and its body to an HTTP/1.1 upstream through a shared net/http.Transport. When the upstream answers the CONNECT with a keep-alive non-2xx response and does not drain the body, Traefik returns the desynchronized backend socket to its shared pool and reuses it for other clients. An unauthenticated attacker can use this behavior to make a different client read the attacker's smuggled response, which can include authenticated or private content from another request. The ForwardAuth middleware with forwardBody true and preserveRequestMethod true can re-issue a CONNECT with the buffered body attached, exposing the auth-client pool to the same desynchronization. This issue is fixed in 2.11.53, 3.6.24, and 3.7.9.","severity":{"version":"4.0","score":7,"vector":"CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:H/SA:N","level":"high","assessor":"cna","from":"cve"},"epss":{"day":"2026-11-12","score":0.01063,"percentile":0.65108,"model":"v2026.06.15"},"facts":{"in_kev":false,"known_exploited":false,"public_exploit":false,"fix_available":true},"cwes":["CWE-444"],"published":"2026-08-06T15:56:33Z","modified":"2026-10-28T02:30:23Z","fixes":[{"ecosystem":"Go","package":"github.com/traefik/traefik/v2","fixed_in":["2.11.53"],"sources":["ghsa","osv"]},{"ecosystem":"Go","package":"github.com/traefik/traefik/v3","fixed_in":["3.6.24","3.7.9"],"sources":["ghsa","osv"]}],"affected":[{"source":"ghsa","ecosystem":"Go","package":"github.com/traefik/traefik/v2","ranges":[{"type":"ECOSYSTEM","events":[{"introduced":"0"},{"last_affected":"2.11.52"},{"fixed":"2.11.53"}]}]},{"source":"ghsa","ecosystem":"Go","package":"github.com/traefik/traefik/v3","ranges":[{"type":"ECOSYSTEM","events":[{"introduced":"0"},{"last_affected":"3.6.23"},{"fixed":"3.6.24"}]}]},{"source":"ghsa","ecosystem":"Go","package":"github.com/traefik/traefik/v3","ranges":[{"type":"ECOSYSTEM","events":[{"introduced":"3.7.0"},{"last_affected":"3.7.8"},{"fixed":"3.7.9"}]}]},{"source":"ghsa","ecosystem":"Go","package":"github.com/traefik/traefik","ranges":[{"type":"ECOSYSTEM","events":[{"introduced":"0"},{"last_affected":"1.7.34"}]}]},{"source":"osv","ecosystem":"Go","package":"github.com/traefik/traefik/v2","ranges":[{"type":"SEMVER","events":[{"introduced":"0"},{"fixed":"2.11.53"}]}]},{"source":"osv","ecosystem":"Go","package":"github.com/traefik/traefik/v3","ranges":[{"type":"SEMVER","events":[{"introduced":"0"},{"fixed":"3.6.24"}]}]},{"source":"osv","ecosystem":"Go","package":"github.com/traefik/traefik/v3","ranges":[{"type":"SEMVER","events":[{"introduced":"3.7.0"},{"fixed":"3.7.9"}]}]},{"source":"osv","ecosystem":"Go","package":"github.com/traefik/traefik","ranges":[{"type":"SEMVER","events":[{"introduced":"0"},{"last_affected":"1.7.34"}]}]},{"source":"osv","ecosystem":"Go","package":"github.com/traefik/traefik","ranges":[{"type":"SEMVER","events":[{"introduced":"0"}]}]},{"source":"osv","ecosystem":"Go","package":"github.com/traefik/traefik/v2","ranges":[{"type":"SEMVER","events":[{"introduced":"0"},{"fixed":"2.11.53"}]}]},{"source":"osv","ecosystem":"Go","package":"github.com/traefik/traefik/v3","ranges":[{"type":"SEMVER","events":[{"introduced":"0"},{"fixed":"3.6.24"},{"introduced":"3.7.0"},{"fixed":"3.7.9"}]}]},{"source":"osv","ecosystem":"SUSE:Linux Enterprise Server 16.0","package":"govulncheck-vulndb","ranges":[{"type":"ECOSYSTEM","events":[{"introduced":"0"},{"fixed":"0.0.20260827T195228-160000.1.1"}]}],"bundled":181},{"source":"osv","ecosystem":"SUSE:Linux Enterprise Server for SAP applications 16.0","package":"govulncheck-vulndb","ranges":[{"type":"ECOSYSTEM","events":[{"introduced":"0"},{"fixed":"0.0.20260827T195228-160000.1.1"}]}],"bundled":181},{"source":"osv","ecosystem":"openSUSE:Leap 16.0","package":"govulncheck-vulndb","ranges":[{"type":"ECOSYSTEM","events":[{"introduced":"0"},{"fixed":"0.0.20260827T195228-160000.1.1"}]}],"bundled":181}],"products":[{"vendor":"traefik","product":"traefik"}],"references":[{"url":"https://github.com/traefik/traefik/security/advisories/GHSA-3ccp-42pg-hgv6","tags":["x_refsource_CONFIRM","Patch","Vendor Advisory","advisory","web"]},{"url":"https://github.com/traefik/traefik/pull/13542","tags":["x_refsource_MISC","Issue Tracking","Patch","fix","web"]},{"url":"https://github.com/traefik/traefik/pull/13543","tags":["x_refsource_MISC","Issue Tracking","Patch","fix","web"]},{"url":"https://github.com/traefik/traefik/pull/13556","tags":["x_refsource_MISC","Issue Tracking","Patch","fix","web"]},{"url":"https://github.com/traefik/traefik/commit/04d36f28e4eae7535e96a6351dd9f7bfb48a30e7","tags":["x_refsource_MISC","Patch","fix","web"]},{"url":"https://github.com/traefik/traefik/commit/0807b6d5dd1da8b2f7f4076ea2392b5437bf2ab0","tags":["x_refsource_MISC","Patch","fix","web"]},{"url":"https://github.com/traefik/traefik/commit/94a7508817d180f0ab2f1eae93df48d4ab19ecce","tags":["x_refsource_MISC","Patch","fix","web"]},{"url":"https://github.com/traefik/traefik/releases/tag/v2.11.53","tags":["x_refsource_MISC","Release Notes","web"]},{"url":"https://github.com/traefik/traefik/releases/tag/v3.6.24","tags":["x_refsource_MISC","Release Notes","web"]},{"url":"https://github.com/traefik/traefik/releases/tag/v3.7.9","tags":["x_refsource_MISC","Release Notes","web"]},{"url":"https://github.com/advisories/GHSA-3ccp-42pg-hgv6"},{"url":"https://github.com/CVEProject/cvelistV5/tree/main/cves/2026/71xxx/CVE-2026-71324.json","tags":["advisory"]},{"url":"https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-71324","tags":["advisory"]},{"url":"https://github.com/traefik/traefik","tags":["package"]},{"url":"https://www.suse.com/support/update/announcement/2026/suse-su-202623625-1/","tags":["advisory"]},{"url":"https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-10722","tags":["web"]},{"url":"https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-11465","tags":["web"]},{"url":"https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-11479","tags":["web"]},{"url":"https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-11481","tags":["web"]},{"url":"https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-11500","tags":["web"]},{"url":"https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-11624","tags":["web"]},{"url":"https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-17106","tags":["web"]},{"url":"https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-25688","tags":["web"]},{"url":"https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-25699","tags":["web"]},{"url":"https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-25700","tags":["web"]},{"url":"https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-32637","tags":["web"]},{"url":"https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-33582","tags":["web"]},{"url":"https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-33818","tags":["web"]},{"url":"https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-34031","tags":["web"]},{"url":"https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-34033","tags":["web"]},{"url":"https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-34177","tags":["web"]},{"url":"https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-34178","tags":["web"]},{"url":"https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-34179","tags":["web"]},{"url":"https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-3433","tags":["web"]},{"url":"https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-34905","tags":["web"]},{"url":"https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-34976","tags":["web"]},{"url":"https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-35172","tags":["web"]},{"url":"https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-35511","tags":["web"]},{"url":"https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-39821","tags":["web"]},{"url":"https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-39832","tags":["web"]},{"url":"https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-39833","tags":["web"]},{"url":"https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-39904","tags":["web"]},{"url":"https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-40173","tags":["web"]},{"url":"https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-41179","tags":["web"]},{"url":"https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-41181","tags":["web"]},{"url":"https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-41327","tags":["web"]},{"url":"https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-41568","tags":["web"]},{"url":"https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-42350","tags":["web"]},{"url":"https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-42508","tags":["web"]},{"url":"https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-43983","tags":["web"]},{"url":"https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-45099","tags":["web"]},{"url":"https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-45404","tags":["web"]},{"url":"https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-46600","tags":["web"]},{"url":"https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-46603","tags":["web"]},{"url":"https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-47427","tags":["web"]},{"url":"https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-48119","tags":["web"]},{"url":"https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-48491","tags":["web"]},{"url":"https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-48786","tags":["web"]},{"url":"https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-49446","tags":["web"]},{"url":"https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-49447","tags":["web"]},{"url":"https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-49980","tags":["web"]},{"url":"https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-50567","tags":["web"]},{"url":"https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-50568","tags":["web"]},{"url":"https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-50569","tags":["web"]},{"url":"https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-50570","tags":["web"]},{"url":"https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-50879","tags":["web"]},{"url":"https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-50884","tags":["web"]},{"url":"https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-50891","tags":["web"]},{"url":"https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-52855","tags":["web"]},{"url":"https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-52856","tags":["web"]},{"url":"https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-52857","tags":["web"]},{"url":"https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-53469","tags":["web"]},{"url":"https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-53470","tags":["web"]},{"url":"https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-53471","tags":["web"]},{"url":"https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-53474","tags":["web"]},{"url":"https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-53475","tags":["web"]},{"url":"https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-53476","tags":["web"]},{"url":"https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-53551","tags":["web"]},{"url":"https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-53622","tags":["web"]},{"url":"https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-53657","tags":["web"]},{"url":"https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-53658","tags":["web"]},{"url":"https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-53941","tags":["web"]},{"url":"https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-54061","tags":["web"]},{"url":"https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-54162","tags":["web"]},{"url":"https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-54167","tags":["web"]},{"url":"https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-54168","tags":["web"]},{"url":"https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-54245","tags":["web"]},{"url":"https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-54332","tags":["web"]},{"url":"https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-54345","tags":["web"]},{"url":"https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-54523","tags":["web"]},{"url":"https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-54526","tags":["web"]},{"url":"https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-54563","tags":["web"]},{"url":"https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-54572","tags":["web"]},{"url":"https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-54593","tags":["web"]},{"url":"https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-54638","tags":["web"]},{"url":"https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-54650","tags":["web"]},{"url":"https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-54680","tags":["web"]},{"url":"https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-54693","tags":["web"]},{"url":"https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-54719","tags":["web"]},{"url":"https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-54725","tags":["web"]},{"url":"https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-54735","tags":["web"]},{"url":"https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-54763","tags":["web"]},{"url":"https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-54764","tags":["web"]},{"url":"https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-54765","tags":["web"]},{"url":"https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-54787","tags":["web"]},{"url":"https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-54908","tags":["web"]},{"url":"https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-54909","tags":["web"]},{"url":"https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-54910","tags":["web"]},{"url":"https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-54917","tags":["web"]},{"url":"https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-55061","tags":["web"]},{"url":"https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-55062","tags":["web"]},{"url":"https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-55092","tags":["web"]},{"url":"https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-55149","tags":["web"]},{"url":"https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-55477","tags":["web"]},{"url":"https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-55495","tags":["web"]},{"url":"https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-55496","tags":["web"]},{"url":"https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-55497","tags":["web"]},{"url":"https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-55499","tags":["web"]},{"url":"https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-55502","tags":["web"]},{"url":"https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-55580","tags":["web"]},{"url":"https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-55581","tags":["web"]},{"url":"https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-55582","tags":["web"]},{"url":"https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-55637","tags":["web"]},{"url":"https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-55677","tags":["web"]},{"url":"https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-56852","tags":["web"]},{"url":"https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-56853","tags":["web"]},{"url":"https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-56858","tags":["web"]},{"url":"https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-56859","tags":["web"]},{"url":"https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-56860","tags":["web"]},{"url":"https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-56862","tags":["web"]},{"url":"https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-56864","tags":["web"]},{"url":"https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-56865","tags":["web"]},{"url":"https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-56867","tags":["web"]},{"url":"https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-56868","tags":["web"]},{"url":"https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-56869","tags":["web"]},{"url":"https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-56870","tags":["web"]},{"url":"https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-56871","tags":["web"]},{"url":"https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-56872","tags":["web"]},{"url":"https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-56873","tags":["web"]},{"url":"https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-56874","tags":["web"]},{"url":"https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-57210","tags":["web"]},{"url":"https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-57497","tags":["web"]},{"url":"https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-59732","tags":["web"]},{"url":"https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-59733","tags":["web"]},{"url":"https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-6046","tags":["web"]},{"url":"https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-61711","tags":["web"]},{"url":"https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-61712","tags":["web"]},{"url":"https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-62323","tags":["web"]},{"url":"https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-62325","tags":["web"]},{"url":"https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-63328","tags":["web"]},{"url":"https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-64679","tags":["web"]},{"url":"https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-64859","tags":["web"]},{"url":"https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-64863","tags":["web"]},{"url":"https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-64865","tags":["web"]},{"url":"https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-64866","tags":["web"]},{"url":"https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-64868","tags":["web"]},{"url":"https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-65600","tags":["web"]},{"url":"https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-65601","tags":["web"]},{"url":"https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-65602","tags":["web"]},{"url":"https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-65834","tags":["web"]},{"url":"https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-65835","tags":["web"]},{"url":"https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-66063","tags":["web"]},{"url":"https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-66064","tags":["web"]},{"url":"https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-6689","tags":["web"]},{"url":"https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-67309","tags":["web"]},{"url":"https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-6739","tags":["web"]},{"url":"https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-67437","tags":["web"]},{"url":"https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-67438","tags":["web"]},{"url":"https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-67439","tags":["web"]},{"url":"https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-67447","tags":["web"]},{"url":"https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-67448","tags":["web"]},{"url":"https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-6961","tags":["web"]},{"url":"https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-71309","tags":["web"]},{"url":"https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-71310","tags":["web"]},{"url":"https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-71311","tags":["web"]},{"url":"https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-71312","tags":["web"]},{"url":"https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-71313","tags":["web"]},{"url":"https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-71324","tags":["web"]},{"url":"https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-71325","tags":["web"]},{"url":"https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-71326","tags":["web"]},{"url":"https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-71327","tags":["web"]},{"url":"https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-71479","tags":["web"]},{"url":"https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-71556","tags":["web"]},{"url":"https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-71557","tags":["web"]},{"url":"https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-7184","tags":["web"]},{"url":"https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-73080","tags":["web"]},{"url":"https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-73499","tags":["web"]},{"url":"https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-73500","tags":["web"]},{"url":"https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-73502","tags":["web"]},{"url":"https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-73505","tags":["web"]},{"url":"https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-73506","tags":["web"]},{"url":"https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-73509","tags":["web"]},{"url":"https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-73564","tags":["web"]},{"url":"https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-7387","tags":["web"]},{"url":"https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-76905","tags":["web"]},{"url":"https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-77354","tags":["web"]},{"url":"","tags":["advisory"]}],"sources":{"cve":[{"id":"CVE-2026-71324","title":"Traefik: Cross-user response poisoning via proxied CONNECT on Traefik's shared backend keep-alive pool","description":"Traefik is an open source HTTP reverse proxy and load balancer. Prior to 2.11.53, 3.6.24, and 3.7.9, Traefik's default HTTP reverse proxy forwards a plain HTTP/2 or HTTP/3 CONNECT request and its body to an HTTP/1.1 upstream through a shared net/http.Transport. When the upstream answers the CONNECT with a keep-alive non-2xx response and does not drain the body, Traefik returns the desynchronized backend socket to its shared pool and reuses it for other clients. An unauthenticated attacker can use this behavior to make a different client read the attacker's smuggled response, which can include authenticated or private content from another request. The ForwardAuth middleware with forwardBody true and preserveRequestMethod true can re-issue a CONNECT with the buffered body attached, exposing the auth-client pool to the same desynchronization. This issue is fixed in 2.11.53, 3.6.24, and 3.7.9.","status":"published","published":"2026-08-06T15:56:33.112Z","modified":"2026-08-07T15:43:19.812Z","cvss":[{"version":"4.0","score":7,"vector":"CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:H/SA:N","level":"high","assessor":"cna"}],"cwes":["CWE-444"],"updated_at":"2026-11-02T14:19:49.199185Z"}],"euvd":[{"id":"EUVD-2026-54288","description":"Traefik is an open source HTTP reverse proxy and load balancer. Prior to 2.11.53, 3.6.24, and 3.7.9, Traefik's default HTTP reverse proxy forwards a plain HTTP/2 or HTTP/3 CONNECT request and its body to an HTTP/1.1 upstream through a shared net/http.Transport. When the upstream answers the CONNECT with a keep-alive non-2xx response and does not drain the body, Traefik returns the desynchronized backend socket to its shared pool and reuses it for other clients. An unauthenticated attacker can use this behavior to make a different client read the attacker's smuggled response, which can include authenticated or private content from another request. The ForwardAuth middleware with forwardBody true and preserveRequestMethod true can re-issue a CONNECT with the buffered body attached, exposing the auth-client pool to the same desynchronization. This issue is fixed in 2.11.53, 3.6.24, and 3.7.9.","status":"published","published":"2026-08-06T15:56:33Z","modified":"2026-08-07T15:43:19Z","cvss":[{"version":"4.0","score":7,"vector":"CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:H/SA:N","level":"high"}],"updated_at":"2026-11-02T18:02:06.930016Z"}],"ghsa":[{"id":"GHSA-3ccp-42pg-hgv6","title":"Traefik: Cross-user response poisoning via proxied CONNECT on Traefik's shared backend keep-alive pool","description":"## Summary\n\nThere is a critical vulnerability in Traefik's default HTTP reverse proxy that leads to unauthenticated cross-user response poisoning. When a client opens an HTTP/2 or HTTP/3 `CONNECT` request, Traefik forwards it — body included — to an HTTP/1.1 upstream over a shared `net/http.Transport`. If the upstream answers the CONNECT with a keep-alive non-2xx response without draining the body, the now-desynchronized backend socket is returned to Traefik's shared connection pool and reused for other clients, letting an attacker make a different client read a response the attacker smuggled — which may be another user's authenticated or private content. The entrypoint's `sanitizePath` option (default `true`) is not a reliable defense: backends that answer `CONNECT /` with a keep-alive non-2xx remain exploitable. The experimental FastProxy implementation was not affected. The issue is fixed by deferring the forwarded CONNECT payload until the backend accepts the tunnel, by not returning CONNECT connections to the shared idle pool, and by discarding the CONNECT body in the ForwardAuth path.\n\n## Patches\n\n- https://github.com/traefik/traefik/releases/tag/v2.11.53\n- https://github.com/traefik/traefik/releases/tag/v3.6.24\n- https://github.com/traefik/traefik/releases/tag/v3.7.9\n\n## For more information\n\nIf you have any questions or comments about this advisory, please [open an issue](https://github.com/traefik/traefik/issues).\n\n\u003cdetails\u003e\n\u003csummary\u003eOriginal Description\u003c/summary\u003e\n\n## Summary\n\nTraefik's default reverse proxy forwards a plain HTTP/2 or HTTP/3 `CONNECT` request and its body to\nan HTTP/1.1 upstream through a shared `net/http.Transport`. When the upstream answers the CONNECT\nwith a keep-alive non-2xx response and does not drain the body, Traefik returns the now\ndesynchronized backend socket to its shared pool and reuses it for other clients. An\nunauthenticated attacker uses this to make a different client read the attacker's smuggled response.\n\nTraefik's default proxy is `net/http/httputil.ReverseProxy` over a shared `http.Transport`, so it\ninherits the same root cause as the Caddy `reverse_proxy` CONNECT pool poisoning.\n\nTraefik ships one partial mitigation Caddy does not. The entrypoint option `sanitizePath` (default\n`true`) rewrites the forwarded CONNECT's empty path to `/`, so Traefik emits `CONNECT /` instead of\nauthority-form `CONNECT host:port`. This is not a reliable defense. It avoids the smuggle only\nagainst backends that reject `CONNECT /` by closing the connection (Apache, nginx). Backends that\nanswer `CONNECT /` with a keep-alive non-2xx and leave the body undrained still cross. That set\nincludes any Go `net/http` server and gunicorn/Flask.\n\nConfirmed on the official image `traefik:v3.6.23` (a currently supported release), default\nconfiguration, against stock `go-httpbin` (Go) and `kennethreitz/httpbin` (Python gunicorn/Flask),\nattacker and victim in separate containers, over both HTTP/2 and HTTP/3.\n\n## Affected\n\n- `traefik:v3.6.23` (official image) and current v3, default configuration, standard proxy to an\n  HTTP/1.1 upstream. Backend keep-alive pooling is on by default (`MaxIdleConnsPerHost` 200).\n- Attacker frontend is HTTP/2 or HTTP/3. An HTTP/1.1 frontend is not affected.\n- The upstream keeps the connection alive after a non-2xx to the forwarded CONNECT and does not\n  drain the body.\n- The experimental FastProxy implementation is not affected (see Not affected).\n\n## Details\n\nThree behaviors compose.\n\n1. Traefik forwards a plain CONNECT as an ordinary proxied request. The default proxy is\n   `httputil.ReverseProxy` with a shared `http.Transport` (`pkg/proxy/httputil/proxy.go`). The\n   director assigns the outbound `URL.Host` directly and does not reject CONNECT, leaving the\n   request body a live stream. The client places a raw HTTP/1.1 request in that body (H2/H3 DATA\n   frames), which is written onto the backend socket after the CONNECT header block.\n\n2. `net/http` writes the CONNECT body unframed and pools the socket. For a CONNECT the transport\n   writes the body with no `Content-Length` and no `Transfer-Encoding`. The upstream answers a\n   keep-alive non-2xx and parses the trailing bytes as a pipelined request. Go reads the non-2xx\n   response and returns the socket to the shared idle pool once the request body reaches EOF (the\n   `wroteRequest` gate), while the smuggled request's response is still pending.\n\n3. Desynchronized reuse. The smuggled request targets a slow endpoint so its response arrives after\n   the socket is pooled. A different client that reuses the socket reads the pending smuggled\n   response as its own.\n\n`sanitizePath` (default `true`, `pkg/server/server_entrypoint_tcp.go`) calls `req.URL.JoinPath()`,\nwhich turns the CONNECT's empty path into `/`. Traefik emits `CONNECT /`. Whether that stops the\nsmuggle depends only on the backend: Apache and nginx answer `400 Bad Request` with\n`Connection: close` (socket torn down, no cross); Go `net/http` and gunicorn/Flask answer a\nkeep-alive non-2xx and pipeline the trailing bytes (cross). With `sanitizePath` off, Traefik emits\nauthority-form `CONNECT host:port`, which Apache answers with a keep-alive `405`.\n\nHTTP/2 and HTTP/3 only. Pooling requires the forwarded request body to reach EOF. An H2/H3 client\nhalf-closes the CONNECT stream (END_STREAM), so the body reaches EOF while the connection stays open\nand the socket is pooled. An H1 CONNECT body is the tunnel and cannot reach EOF without closing the\nconnection, so the socket is closed, not pooled. HTTP/3 routes to the same handler chain as HTTPS.\n\n## Backend behavior\n\n\"Armed\" means the backend answers with a keep-alive non-2xx and parses the trailing undrained bytes\nas a pipelined request. Default Traefik emits `CONNECT /`; with `sanitizePath: false` it emits\nauthority-form `CONNECT host:port`.\n\n| Backend (stock image)   | Server         | `CONNECT /` (default)      | authority-form CONNECT |\n|-------------------------|----------------|----------------------------|------------------------|\n| `mccutchen/go-httpbin`  | Go net/http    | armed (405 keep-alive)     | armed                  |\n| `traefik/whoami`        | Go net/http    | armed (200 keep-alive)     | armed                  |\n| `caddy:2`               | Go net/http    | armed (405 keep-alive)     | armed                  |\n| `kennethreitz/httpbin`  | gunicorn/Flask | armed (405 keep-alive)     | armed                  |\n| `httpd:2.4`             | Apache         | not armed (400 close)      | armed (405 keep-alive) |\n| `nginx:alpine`          | nginx          | not armed (400 close)      | not armed (400 close)  |\n| `tomcat:10`             | Tomcat         | not armed (501 close)      | -                      |\n| node `http`             | Node.js        | not armed (closes)         | -                      |\n| `python -m http.server` | Python stdlib  | not armed (501 close)      | -                      |\n\n## Impact\n\nUnauthenticated cross-user HTTP response poisoning. One client receives another client's response,\nwhich can be authenticated or private content, or an attacker-chosen response.\n\nBlast radius depends on the pool. With the default pool and a slow smuggled endpoint the crossing is\nreliable for a converging victim. With a bounded pool one desync shifts the whole response queue:\nmeasured with `MaxIdleConnsPerHost 1` and a slow victim endpoint, 8 of 8 sequential victims read a\nresponse that was not their own (1 the attacker's, 7 another user's, 0 their own). Traefik does not\nexpose `MaxConnsPerHost`, so the parallel cascade is weaker than Caddy's.\n\n## Proof of concept\n\n`poc/run.sh` runs the official `traefik:v3.6.23` image fronting real off-the-shelf backends over\nHTTP/1.1, with attacker and victim in separate containers. Requires docker and python3. It builds\nthe attack client, pulls the stock images, and runs the scenarios below.\n\nThe attacker opens an H2 or H3 `CONNECT` to Traefik and sends a raw HTTP/1.1\n`GET /delay/2?tag=ATTACKERSMUGGLED` as the CONNECT body, then half-closes the stream. Traefik\nforwards the CONNECT to the Go/Python backend, the backend answers a keep-alive non-2xx, keeps the\nsocket, and parses the trailing GET as a pipelined request, so a response to it is queued on that\nsocket. `net/http` returns the socket to Traefik's shared pool. The victim then sends\n`GET /get?tag=VICTIMOWN` on its own connection, Traefik reuses the pooled backend socket, and the\nvictim reads the queued `/delay` response instead of its own. `CROSS` means the victim received a\nresponse that was not its own.\n\n## Expected output from poc\n\n```\n== core: DEFAULT config, cross-user poisoning vs real off-the-shelf backends ==\n  [core-go-h2] h2-\u003eh2 CROSS\n  [core-go-h3] h3-\u003eh3 CROSS\n  [core-go-x] h2-\u003eh3 CROSS\n  [core-py-h2] h2-\u003eh2 CROSS\n  [core-py-h3] h3-\u003eh3 CROSS\n== mechanism: sanitizePath off -\u003e stock Apache 405 (the direct Caddy analogue) ==\n  [mech-ap-h2] h2-\u003eh2 CROSS\n  [mech-ap-h3] h3-\u003eh3 CROSS\n== controls: must NOT cross ==\n  [ctl-apache] h2-\u003eh2 NO_CROSS\n  [ctl-pooloff] h2-\u003eh2 NO_CROSS\n  [ctl-kaoff] h2-\u003eh2 NO_CROSS\n== safe variant: experimental FastProxy chunk-frames the CONNECT body ==\n  [safe-fast] h2-\u003eh2 NO_CROSS\n== cascade: bounded pool, one desync poisons a queue of victims ==\n  smuggled=1 other_user=7 own=0 of 8 (cross-user poisoned=8)\nRESULT: PASS\n```\n\n- Core rows. DEFAULT Traefik config against a Go backend (`go-httpbin`) and a Python gunicorn/Flask\n  backend (`kennethreitz/httpbin`), for H2-\u003eH2, H3-\u003eH3, and H2-\u003eH3. The victim reads the attacker's\n  smuggled response.\n- Mechanism rows. `sanitizePath` off and stock Apache. Traefik emits authority-form\n  `CONNECT apache-backend:80`, Apache answers a keep-alive `405`, and it crosses. This is the direct\n  Caddy analogue and proves the full mechanism including Apache.\n- Control rows. `ctl-apache` runs the default config against Apache, which closes `CONNECT /`;\n  `ctl-pooloff` disables Traefik backend reuse (`maxIdleConnsPerHost: -1`); `ctl-kaoff` runs Apache\n  with `KeepAlive Off`. All three print `NO_CROSS`, so the crossing depends on backend socket reuse,\n  not pipelining or a shared client.\n- Safe variant. Experimental FastProxy against the Go backend prints `NO_CROSS` because it\n  chunk-frames the CONNECT body.\n- Cascade. `MaxIdleConnsPerHost 1` and a slow victim endpoint. One CONNECT desync shifts the queue:\n  of 8 sequential victims, 1 reads the attacker's smuggled response, 7 read another user's response,\n  0 read their own.\n\nThe captured crossing (`poc/evidence/RELEASE_v3.6.23_victim.json`): the victim sent\n`GET /get?tag=VICTIM_OWN` and received a 200 whose body is the response to\n`GET /delay/2?tag=ATTACKER_SMUGGLED` with the echoed header `X-Smuggled: released-v3.6.23`, none of\nwhich the victim sent.\n\n## Not affected\n\n- HTTP/1.1 frontend. An H1 CONNECT body cannot reach EOF without closing the connection, so the\n  backend socket is not pooled.\n- Experimental FastProxy (`experimental.fastProxy`). It chunk-frames the forwarded CONNECT body\n  (`Transfer-Encoding: chunked`, captured in `poc/evidence/wire_fastproxy_chunked.txt`), so the\n  trailing bytes are read as the CONNECT body, not a pipelined request. `safe-fast` is `NO_CROSS`.\n\n## ForwardAuth\n\nThe ForwardAuth middleware with `forwardBody: true` and `preserveRequestMethod: true` re-issues the\nrequest to the auth server as a CONNECT with the buffered body re-attached and `ContentLength` never\nset (`pkg/middlewares/auth/forward.go`). The auth client writes that body unframed to the auth\nserver (captured on the wire), so a keep-alive non-2xx from the auth server poisons the shared\nauth-client pool the same way.\n\n## Root cause\n\n`net/http` pools a connection after a keep-alive non-2xx response to a CONNECT whose body it wrote\nunframed. Traefik's default proxy forwards client CONNECT through a shared `net/http.Transport` and\napplies no CONNECT rejection. `sanitizePath` changes the emitted request target but does not remove\nthe defect. Traefik's own FastProxy implementation frames the CONNECT body and does not cross, which\nshows this is a property of the httputil/`net/http` path, not fixed by path normalization.\n\n## POC\n\n[poc.zip](https://github.com/user-attachments/files/29963125/poc.zip)\n\n\u003c/details\u003e\n\n---","status":"published","published":"2026-08-06T15:56:40Z","modified":"2026-08-06T15:56:42Z","cvss":[{"version":"4.0","score":7,"vector":"CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:H/SA:N","level":"high"}],"cwes":["CWE-444"],"updated_at":"2026-11-02T14:40:57.999375Z"}],"nvd":[{"id":"CVE-2026-71324","description":"Traefik is an open source HTTP reverse proxy and load balancer. Prior to 2.11.53, 3.6.24, and 3.7.9, Traefik's default HTTP reverse proxy forwards a plain HTTP/2 or HTTP/3 CONNECT request and its body to an HTTP/1.1 upstream through a shared net/http.Transport. When the upstream answers the CONNECT with a keep-alive non-2xx response and does not drain the body, Traefik returns the desynchronized backend socket to its shared pool and reuses it for other clients. An unauthenticated attacker can use this behavior to make a different client read the attacker's smuggled response, which can include authenticated or private content from another request. The ForwardAuth middleware with forwardBody true and preserveRequestMethod true can re-issue a CONNECT with the buffered body attached, exposing the auth-client pool to the same desynchronization. This issue is fixed in 2.11.53, 3.6.24, and 3.7.9.","status":"published","published":"2026-08-06T22:18:29.31Z","modified":"2026-09-16T20:46:12.443Z","cvss":[{"version":"4.0","score":7,"vector":"CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:H/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X","level":"high","assessor":"secondary"},{"version":"3.1","score":9.1,"vector":"CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N","level":"critical","assessor":"primary"}],"cwes":["CWE-444"],"updated_at":"2026-11-02T14:12:35.386166Z"}],"osv":[{"id":"CVE-2026-71324","title":"Traefik: Cross-user response poisoning via proxied CONNECT on Traefik's shared backend keep-alive pool","description":"Traefik is an open source HTTP reverse proxy and load balancer. Prior to 2.11.53, 3.6.24, and 3.7.9, Traefik's default HTTP reverse proxy forwards a plain HTTP/2 or HTTP/3 CONNECT request and its body to an HTTP/1.1 upstream through a shared net/http.Transport. When the upstream answers the CONNECT with a keep-alive non-2xx response and does not drain the body, Traefik returns the desynchronized backend socket to its shared pool and reuses it for other clients. An unauthenticated attacker can use this behavior to make a different client read the attacker's smuggled response, which can include authenticated or private content from another request. The ForwardAuth middleware with forwardBody true and preserveRequestMethod true can re-issue a CONNECT with the buffered body attached, exposing the auth-client pool to the same desynchronization. This issue is fixed in 2.11.53, 3.6.24, and 3.7.9.","status":"published","published":"2026-08-06T15:56:33.112Z","modified":"2026-10-28T02:30:23.188206035Z","cvss":[{"version":"4.0","score":7,"vector":"CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:H/SA:N","level":"high"}],"cwes":["CWE-444"],"updated_at":"2026-11-02T15:45:15.164658Z"},{"id":"GHSA-3ccp-42pg-hgv6","title":"Traefik: Cross-user response poisoning via proxied CONNECT on Traefik's shared backend keep-alive pool","description":"## Summary\n\nThere is a critical vulnerability in Traefik's default HTTP reverse proxy that leads to unauthenticated cross-user response poisoning. When a client opens an HTTP/2 or HTTP/3 `CONNECT` request, Traefik forwards it — body included — to an HTTP/1.1 upstream over a shared `net/http.Transport`. If the upstream answers the CONNECT with a keep-alive non-2xx response without draining the body, the now-desynchronized backend socket is returned to Traefik's shared connection pool and reused for other clients, letting an attacker make a different client read a response the attacker smuggled — which may be another user's authenticated or private content. The entrypoint's `sanitizePath` option (default `true`) is not a reliable defense: backends that answer `CONNECT /` with a keep-alive non-2xx remain exploitable. The experimental FastProxy implementation was not affected. The issue is fixed by deferring the forwarded CONNECT payload until the backend accepts the tunnel, by not returning CONNECT connections to the shared idle pool, and by discarding the CONNECT body in the ForwardAuth path.\n\n## Patches\n\n- https://github.com/traefik/traefik/releases/tag/v2.11.53\n- https://github.com/traefik/traefik/releases/tag/v3.6.24\n- https://github.com/traefik/traefik/releases/tag/v3.7.9\n\n## For more information\n\nIf you have any questions or comments about this advisory, please [open an issue](https://github.com/traefik/traefik/issues).\n\n\u003cdetails\u003e\n\u003csummary\u003eOriginal Description\u003c/summary\u003e\n\n## Summary\n\nTraefik's default reverse proxy forwards a plain HTTP/2 or HTTP/3 `CONNECT` request and its body to\nan HTTP/1.1 upstream through a shared `net/http.Transport`. When the upstream answers the CONNECT\nwith a keep-alive non-2xx response and does not drain the body, Traefik returns the now\ndesynchronized backend socket to its shared pool and reuses it for other clients. An\nunauthenticated attacker uses this to make a different client read the attacker's smuggled response.\n\nTraefik's default proxy is `net/http/httputil.ReverseProxy` over a shared `http.Transport`, so it\ninherits the same root cause as the Caddy `reverse_proxy` CONNECT pool poisoning.\n\nTraefik ships one partial mitigation Caddy does not. The entrypoint option `sanitizePath` (default\n`true`) rewrites the forwarded CONNECT's empty path to `/`, so Traefik emits `CONNECT /` instead of\nauthority-form `CONNECT host:port`. This is not a reliable defense. It avoids the smuggle only\nagainst backends that reject `CONNECT /` by closing the connection (Apache, nginx). Backends that\nanswer `CONNECT /` with a keep-alive non-2xx and leave the body undrained still cross. That set\nincludes any Go `net/http` server and gunicorn/Flask.\n\nConfirmed on the official image `traefik:v3.6.23` (a currently supported release), default\nconfiguration, against stock `go-httpbin` (Go) and `kennethreitz/httpbin` (Python gunicorn/Flask),\nattacker and victim in separate containers, over both HTTP/2 and HTTP/3.\n\n## Affected\n\n- `traefik:v3.6.23` (official image) and current v3, default configuration, standard proxy to an\n  HTTP/1.1 upstream. Backend keep-alive pooling is on by default (`MaxIdleConnsPerHost` 200).\n- Attacker frontend is HTTP/2 or HTTP/3. An HTTP/1.1 frontend is not affected.\n- The upstream keeps the connection alive after a non-2xx to the forwarded CONNECT and does not\n  drain the body.\n- The experimental FastProxy implementation is not affected (see Not affected).\n\n## Details\n\nThree behaviors compose.\n\n1. Traefik forwards a plain CONNECT as an ordinary proxied request. The default proxy is\n   `httputil.ReverseProxy` with a shared `http.Transport` (`pkg/proxy/httputil/proxy.go`). The\n   director assigns the outbound `URL.Host` directly and does not reject CONNECT, leaving the\n   request body a live stream. The client places a raw HTTP/1.1 request in that body (H2/H3 DATA\n   frames), which is written onto the backend socket after the CONNECT header block.\n\n2. `net/http` writes the CONNECT body unframed and pools the socket. For a CONNECT the transport\n   writes the body with no `Content-Length` and no `Transfer-Encoding`. The upstream answers a\n   keep-alive non-2xx and parses the trailing bytes as a pipelined request. Go reads the non-2xx\n   response and returns the socket to the shared idle pool once the request body reaches EOF (the\n   `wroteRequest` gate), while the smuggled request's response is still pending.\n\n3. Desynchronized reuse. The smuggled request targets a slow endpoint so its response arrives after\n   the socket is pooled. A different client that reuses the socket reads the pending smuggled\n   response as its own.\n\n`sanitizePath` (default `true`, `pkg/server/server_entrypoint_tcp.go`) calls `req.URL.JoinPath()`,\nwhich turns the CONNECT's empty path into `/`. Traefik emits `CONNECT /`. Whether that stops the\nsmuggle depends only on the backend: Apache and nginx answer `400 Bad Request` with\n`Connection: close` (socket torn down, no cross); Go `net/http` and gunicorn/Flask answer a\nkeep-alive non-2xx and pipeline the trailing bytes (cross). With `sanitizePath` off, Traefik emits\nauthority-form `CONNECT host:port`, which Apache answers with a keep-alive `405`.\n\nHTTP/2 and HTTP/3 only. Pooling requires the forwarded request body to reach EOF. An H2/H3 client\nhalf-closes the CONNECT stream (END_STREAM), so the body reaches EOF while the connection stays open\nand the socket is pooled. An H1 CONNECT body is the tunnel and cannot reach EOF without closing the\nconnection, so the socket is closed, not pooled. HTTP/3 routes to the same handler chain as HTTPS.\n\n## Backend behavior\n\n\"Armed\" means the backend answers with a keep-alive non-2xx and parses the trailing undrained bytes\nas a pipelined request. Default Traefik emits `CONNECT /`; with `sanitizePath: false` it emits\nauthority-form `CONNECT host:port`.\n\n| Backend (stock image)   | Server         | `CONNECT /` (default)      | authority-form CONNECT |\n|-------------------------|----------------|----------------------------|------------------------|\n| `mccutchen/go-httpbin`  | Go net/http    | armed (405 keep-alive)     | armed                  |\n| `traefik/whoami`        | Go net/http    | armed (200 keep-alive)     | armed                  |\n| `caddy:2`               | Go net/http    | armed (405 keep-alive)     | armed                  |\n| `kennethreitz/httpbin`  | gunicorn/Flask | armed (405 keep-alive)     | armed                  |\n| `httpd:2.4`             | Apache         | not armed (400 close)      | armed (405 keep-alive) |\n| `nginx:alpine`          | nginx          | not armed (400 close)      | not armed (400 close)  |\n| `tomcat:10`             | Tomcat         | not armed (501 close)      | -                      |\n| node `http`             | Node.js        | not armed (closes)         | -                      |\n| `python -m http.server` | Python stdlib  | not armed (501 close)      | -                      |\n\n## Impact\n\nUnauthenticated cross-user HTTP response poisoning. One client receives another client's response,\nwhich can be authenticated or private content, or an attacker-chosen response.\n\nBlast radius depends on the pool. With the default pool and a slow smuggled endpoint the crossing is\nreliable for a converging victim. With a bounded pool one desync shifts the whole response queue:\nmeasured with `MaxIdleConnsPerHost 1` and a slow victim endpoint, 8 of 8 sequential victims read a\nresponse that was not their own (1 the attacker's, 7 another user's, 0 their own). Traefik does not\nexpose `MaxConnsPerHost`, so the parallel cascade is weaker than Caddy's.\n\n## Proof of concept\n\n`poc/run.sh` runs the official `traefik:v3.6.23` image fronting real off-the-shelf backends over\nHTTP/1.1, with attacker and victim in separate containers. Requires docker and python3. It builds\nthe attack client, pulls the stock images, and runs the scenarios below.\n\nThe attacker opens an H2 or H3 `CONNECT` to Traefik and sends a raw HTTP/1.1\n`GET /delay/2?tag=ATTACKERSMUGGLED` as the CONNECT body, then half-closes the stream. Traefik\nforwards the CONNECT to the Go/Python backend, the backend answers a keep-alive non-2xx, keeps the\nsocket, and parses the trailing GET as a pipelined request, so a response to it is queued on that\nsocket. `net/http` returns the socket to Traefik's shared pool. The victim then sends\n`GET /get?tag=VICTIMOWN` on its own connection, Traefik reuses the pooled backend socket, and the\nvictim reads the queued `/delay` response instead of its own. `CROSS` means the victim received a\nresponse that was not its own.\n\n## Expected output from poc\n\n```\n== core: DEFAULT config, cross-user poisoning vs real off-the-shelf backends ==\n  [core-go-h2] h2-\u003eh2 CROSS\n  [core-go-h3] h3-\u003eh3 CROSS\n  [core-go-x] h2-\u003eh3 CROSS\n  [core-py-h2] h2-\u003eh2 CROSS\n  [core-py-h3] h3-\u003eh3 CROSS\n== mechanism: sanitizePath off -\u003e stock Apache 405 (the direct Caddy analogue) ==\n  [mech-ap-h2] h2-\u003eh2 CROSS\n  [mech-ap-h3] h3-\u003eh3 CROSS\n== controls: must NOT cross ==\n  [ctl-apache] h2-\u003eh2 NO_CROSS\n  [ctl-pooloff] h2-\u003eh2 NO_CROSS\n  [ctl-kaoff] h2-\u003eh2 NO_CROSS\n== safe variant: experimental FastProxy chunk-frames the CONNECT body ==\n  [safe-fast] h2-\u003eh2 NO_CROSS\n== cascade: bounded pool, one desync poisons a queue of victims ==\n  smuggled=1 other_user=7 own=0 of 8 (cross-user poisoned=8)\nRESULT: PASS\n```\n\n- Core rows. DEFAULT Traefik config against a Go backend (`go-httpbin`) and a Python gunicorn/Flask\n  backend (`kennethreitz/httpbin`), for H2-\u003eH2, H3-\u003eH3, and H2-\u003eH3. The victim reads the attacker's\n  smuggled response.\n- Mechanism rows. `sanitizePath` off and stock Apache. Traefik emits authority-form\n  `CONNECT apache-backend:80`, Apache answers a keep-alive `405`, and it crosses. This is the direct\n  Caddy analogue and proves the full mechanism including Apache.\n- Control rows. `ctl-apache` runs the default config against Apache, which closes `CONNECT /`;\n  `ctl-pooloff` disables Traefik backend reuse (`maxIdleConnsPerHost: -1`); `ctl-kaoff` runs Apache\n  with `KeepAlive Off`. All three print `NO_CROSS`, so the crossing depends on backend socket reuse,\n  not pipelining or a shared client.\n- Safe variant. Experimental FastProxy against the Go backend prints `NO_CROSS` because it\n  chunk-frames the CONNECT body.\n- Cascade. `MaxIdleConnsPerHost 1` and a slow victim endpoint. One CONNECT desync shifts the queue:\n  of 8 sequential victims, 1 reads the attacker's smuggled response, 7 read another user's response,\n  0 read their own.\n\nThe captured crossing (`poc/evidence/RELEASE_v3.6.23_victim.json`): the victim sent\n`GET /get?tag=VICTIM_OWN` and received a 200 whose body is the response to\n`GET /delay/2?tag=ATTACKER_SMUGGLED` with the echoed header `X-Smuggled: released-v3.6.23`, none of\nwhich the victim sent.\n\n## Not affected\n\n- HTTP/1.1 frontend. An H1 CONNECT body cannot reach EOF without closing the connection, so the\n  backend socket is not pooled.\n- Experimental FastProxy (`experimental.fastProxy`). It chunk-frames the forwarded CONNECT body\n  (`Transfer-Encoding: chunked`, captured in `poc/evidence/wire_fastproxy_chunked.txt`), so the\n  trailing bytes are read as the CONNECT body, not a pipelined request. `safe-fast` is `NO_CROSS`.\n\n## ForwardAuth\n\nThe ForwardAuth middleware with `forwardBody: true` and `preserveRequestMethod: true` re-issues the\nrequest to the auth server as a CONNECT with the buffered body re-attached and `ContentLength` never\nset (`pkg/middlewares/auth/forward.go`). The auth client writes that body unframed to the auth\nserver (captured on the wire), so a keep-alive non-2xx from the auth server poisons the shared\nauth-client pool the same way.\n\n## Root cause\n\n`net/http` pools a connection after a keep-alive non-2xx response to a CONNECT whose body it wrote\nunframed. Traefik's default proxy forwards client CONNECT through a shared `net/http.Transport` and\napplies no CONNECT rejection. `sanitizePath` changes the emitted request target but does not remove\nthe defect. Traefik's own FastProxy implementation frames the CONNECT body and does not cross, which\nshows this is a property of the httputil/`net/http` path, not fixed by path normalization.\n\n## POC\n\n[poc.zip](https://github.com/user-attachments/files/29963125/poc.zip)\n\n\u003c/details\u003e\n\n---","status":"published","published":"2026-08-06T15:56:40Z","modified":"2026-08-18T15:10:47.77143018Z","cvss":[{"version":"4.0","score":7,"vector":"CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:H/SA:N","level":"high"}],"cwes":["CWE-444"],"updated_at":"2026-11-02T15:46:35.406455Z"},{"id":"GO-2026-6201","title":"Traefik: Cross-user response poisoning via proxied CONNECT on Traefik's shared backend keep-alive pool in github.com/traefik/traefik","description":"Traefik: Cross-user response poisoning via proxied CONNECT on Traefik's shared backend keep-alive pool in github.com/traefik/traefik","status":"published","published":"2026-08-18T14:32:29Z","modified":"2026-08-18T15:00:19.80432379Z","updated_at":"2026-11-02T15:47:03.11707Z"},{"id":"openSUSE-SU-2026:21761-1","title":"Security update for govulncheck-vulndb","description":"This update for govulncheck-vulndb fixes the following issues:\n\n- Update to version 0.0.20260827T195228 2026-08-27T19:52:28Z (jsc#PED-11136).\n\n  Go CVE Numbering Authority IDs added or updated with aliases:\n\n  * GO-2026-5026 CVE-2026-39821\n  * GO-2026-6225\n  * GO-2026-6250 CVE-2026-63328 GHSA-8rc5-4fr6-64pw\n  * GO-2026-6253 CVE-2026-17106 GHSA-hfg8-hc9c-6c3h\n  * GO-2026-6254 CVE-2026-53941 GHSA-vjhx-2cqw-3q6q\n  * GO-2026-6255 CVE-2026-61711 GHSA-7236-3392-c5c6\n  * GO-2026-6256 CVE-2026-61712 GHSA-72x6-4j93-7w86\n  * GO-2026-6258 CVE-2026-45404 GHSA-42cj-99w8-cp2p\n  * GO-2026-6259 CVE-2026-32637 GHSA-j2g6-362q-6qc6\n  * GO-2026-6260 CVE-2026-55149 GHSA-qqff-5854-px68\n  * GO-2026-6261 CVE-2026-54061 GHSA-rrwh-6jrq-wp5v\n  * GO-2026-6262 GHSA-22w5-2fxg-vrwx\n  * GO-2026-6263 CVE-2026-54168 GHSA-6f2p-296r-cc28\n  * GO-2026-6264 CVE-2026-54245 GHSA-7q96-f8xw-jv5j\n  * GO-2026-6265 GHSA-8fxq-53rx-ph5f\n  * GO-2026-6266 CVE-2026-54167 GHSA-f5f4-3hh4-f54m\n  * GO-2026-6267 GHSA-h58c-xccx-75m3\n  * GO-2026-6268 GHSA-q9c5-pp7m-fm2g\n  * GO-2026-6269 GHSA-rxhg-vcww-2mpw\n  * GO-2026-6270 CVE-2026-54162 GHSA-x3g7-qrwc-f6c5\n  * GO-2026-6271 CVE-2026-67448 GHSA-8r62-w5wh-fc5m\n  * GO-2026-6272 CVE-2026-67447 GHSA-r553-m4fv-5v97\n  * GO-2026-6273 CVE-2026-64679 GHSA-26w5-6g95-gj28\n  * GO-2026-6274 CVE-2026-76905 GHSA-mmfr-pmjx-hw9w\n  * GO-2026-6275 CVE-2026-77354 GHSA-xhj3-7xw9-vr34\n  * GO-2026-6277 GHSA-4ph6-mjv7-3fq6\n  * GO-2026-6278 GHSA-w67g-5rqw-f597\n  * GO-2026-6279 CVE-2026-6046 GHSA-3vmp-whvv-5v9v\n  * GO-2026-6280 CVE-2026-7387 GHSA-6hxm-w4hv-vgvw\n  * GO-2026-6281 CVE-2026-6961 GHSA-8qq9-cqj8-82w4\n  * GO-2026-6282 CVE-2026-7184 GHSA-9p44-r552-4wp9\n  * GO-2026-6283 CVE-2026-6689 GHSA-c28q-m4gf-vg4q\n  * GO-2026-6284 CVE-2026-55477 GHSA-jm48-m3rr-9hgg\n  * GO-2026-6285 CVE-2026-6739 GHSA-m2w9-h2mm-79qr\n  * GO-2026-6286 CVE-2026-3433 GHSA-rp4v-qc77-phm4\n  * GO-2026-6287 GHSA-vx2m-jpxr-xv7w\n  * GO-2026-6288 CVE-2026-11624 GHSA-76g7-m3xw-x9gr\n  * GO-2026-6289 GHSA-w8j7-39hp-8x59\n  * GO-2026-6290 CVE-2026-55581 GHSA-3x77-wg38-92r3\n  * GO-2026-6291 CVE-2026-55582 GHSA-74hp-mggr-hv58\n  * GO-2026-6292 CVE-2026-55580 GHSA-f5pj-2738-996m\n  * GO-2026-6293 CVE-2026-55677 GHSA-vfp3-v2gw-7wfq\n  * GO-2026-6294 CVE-2026-55092 GHSA-mcj4-mphf-j9ff\n  * GO-2026-6295 CVE-2026-55637 GHSA-cmwv-wf9p-p8wx\n  * GO-2026-6296 CVE-2026-54523 GHSA-79gf-7frw-68m9\n  * GO-2026-6297 CVE-2026-50879 GHSA-g743-m6x3-v6wm\n  * GO-2026-6298 CVE-2026-54563 GHSA-w5fv-7x5q-g8qp\n  * GO-2026-6299 CVE-2026-50884 GHSA-5442-mh7f-72px\n  * GO-2026-6300 CVE-2026-50891 GHSA-rcqf-cpv9-g5jf\n  * GO-2026-6301 CVE-2026-42350 GHSA-g7gw-m874-7rmf\n\n- Update to version 0.0.20260819T170606 2026-08-19T17:06:06Z.\n\n  Go CVE Numbering Authority IDs added or updated with aliases:\n\n  * GO-2026-4720 GHSA-v3mg-9v85-fcm7\n  * GO-2026-4942 CVE-2026-35172 GHSA-f2g3-hh2r-cwgc\n  * GO-2026-4950\n  * GO-2026-6093 GHSA-464c-974j-9xm6\n  * GO-2026-6094 GHSA-gcjh-h69q-9w9g\n  * GO-2026-6095 GHSA-r277-6w6q-xmqw\n  * GO-2026-6097 CVE-2026-55495 GHSA-49h3-cwhj-4737\n  * GO-2026-6098 CVE-2026-55496 GHSA-8r7f-r8hj-r3rv\n  * GO-2026-6099 CVE-2026-57497 GHSA-g35j-m5xg-vh3q\n  * GO-2026-6100 CVE-2026-55497 GHSA-g9j2-8w95-3vwv\n  * GO-2026-6101 CVE-2026-55502 GHSA-hq88-5x99-x3gf\n  * GO-2026-6102 CVE-2026-55499 GHSA-w8x7-h2px-xmq8\n  * GO-2026-6103 CVE-2026-73564 GHSA-26gq-p25f-99cp\n  * GO-2026-6104 CVE-2026-62323 GHSA-c3jm-gv5r-9wcp\n  * GO-2026-6105 GHSA-c534-2w9c-x7fm\n  * GO-2026-6106 GHSA-v6w6-358x-2433\n  * GO-2026-6107 CVE-2026-73500 GHSA-6vch-q96h-7gc3\n  * GO-2026-6108 CVE-2026-73505 GHSA-6xj8-qv9j-xcjq\n  * GO-2026-6109 GHSA-86cx-wwf4-phq4\n  * GO-2026-6110 CVE-2026-73509 GHSA-95cv-r8x4-vh75\n  * GO-2026-6111 CVE-2026-73506 GHSA-fwjx-9p69-h25h\n  * GO-2026-6112 CVE-2026-73502 GHSA-jpcw-4wr7-c3vq\n  * GO-2026-6113 GHSA-p6ph-3jx2-3337\n  * GO-2026-6114 CVE-2026-73499 GHSA-xg4h-6gfc-h4m8\n  * GO-2026-6115 CVE-2026-56867\n  * GO-2026-6117 GHSA-hp74-gm6m-2qm5\n  * GO-2026-6118 CVE-2026-47427 GHSA-w4q6-qw23-4rg7\n  * GO-2026-6119 CVE-2026-43983 GHSA-w6p7-2fxx-4f44\n  * GO-2026-6120 CVE-2026-54593 GHSA-8r6w-3qq5-4p4r\n  * GO-2026-6121 CVE-2026-54345 GHSA-6r28-9ppf-4hj5\n  * GO-2026-6122 CVE-2026-54332 GHSA-g6v3-7xmc-w563\n  * GO-2026-6123 CVE-2026-49446 GHSA-2rx5-2g7j-2659\n  * GO-2026-6124 CVE-2026-49447 GHSA-5fqm-cc34-fcf5\n  * GO-2026-6125 CVE-2026-11479 GHSA-6h35-9p2w-3j3r\n  * GO-2026-6126 CVE-2026-11465 GHSA-7v3v-cp44-vc8m\n  * GO-2026-6127 CVE-2026-50567 GHSA-q6vm-xqc9-v3ff\n  * GO-2026-6128 CVE-2026-11481 GHSA-q76h-p6jh-9rw3\n  * GO-2026-6129 CVE-2026-50570 GHSA-qf5v-m7p4-95rp\n  * GO-2026-6130 CVE-2026-50568 GHSA-r5jh-q2mw-gcx4\n  * GO-2026-6131 CVE-2026-50569 GHSA-vchh-r53j-8mpw\n  * GO-2026-6132 CVE-2026-62325 GHSA-rjrw-mjq6-hpmm\n  * GO-2026-6133 CVE-2026-54719 GHSA-rmxw-pq4x-3fvh\n  * GO-2026-6134 CVE-2026-66064 GHSA-964w-f6gj-5236\n  * GO-2026-6135 CVE-2026-54650 GHSA-fh2f-xfxc-q9cc\n  * GO-2026-6136 CVE-2026-64863 GHSA-hq33-8jgp-8qq3\n  * GO-2026-6137 CVE-2026-66063 GHSA-wg2q-39h6-66x9\n  * GO-2026-6138 CVE-2026-54638 GHSA-whmm-qj9r-wvr2\n  * GO-2026-6139 CVE-2026-54735 GHSA-4p3g-4hcj-wpvx\n  * GO-2026-6140 CVE-2026-11500 GHSA-jqpm-wf57-qx5c\n  * GO-2026-6141 CVE-2026-54693 GHSA-jq8w-8q2f-ffm9\n  * GO-2026-6142 CVE-2026-54680 GHSA-mjqf-28ph-426h\n  * GO-2026-6143 GHSA-xvg2-cgv6-6h7v\n  * GO-2026-6144 CVE-2026-67439 GHSA-jm28-2wcr-qf3h\n  * GO-2026-6145 CVE-2026-67438 GHSA-xc5w-4v5w-7x65\n  * GO-2026-6146 CVE-2026-67437 GHSA-xpxj-f2fm-rqch\n  * GO-2026-6147 CVE-2026-25688 GHSA-hmr2-99jm-8x45\n  * GO-2026-6148 CVE-2026-25699 GHSA-w754-5646-xq9j\n  * GO-2026-6151 CVE-2026-34033 GHSA-6qwm-5fm9-cvjx\n  * GO-2026-6152 CVE-2026-34905 GHSA-85r2-pvg8-89r9\n  * GO-2026-6153 CVE-2026-33582 GHSA-v553-g2w6-295p\n  * GO-2026-6154 CVE-2026-34031 GHSA-x4f6-mqg6-28xx\n  * GO-2026-6155 CVE-2026-65834 GHSA-68cj-mvg9-rgm2\n  * GO-2026-6156 CVE-2026-52856 GHSA-ghrq-5wpp-hxx5\n  * GO-2026-6157 CVE-2026-65835 GHSA-jr6p-8pjj-mfx6\n  * GO-2026-6158 CVE-2026-52855 GHSA-pfvc-3p5h-x7h6\n  * GO-2026-6159 CVE-2026-52857 GHSA-q6hh-gp44-4hcm\n  * GO-2026-6160 CVE-2026-54725 GHSA-r2v3-8gwf-7ghm\n  * GO-2026-6161 CVE-2026-53551 GHSA-qj55-47fp-p62j\n  * GO-2026-6162 CVE-2026-54787 GHSA-wqqc-jjcq-vfxm\n  * GO-2026-6163 CVE-2026-54909 GHSA-34rh-wp3j-6cxc\n  * GO-2026-6164 CVE-2026-54910 GHSA-vvp7-h4fj-m28w\n  * GO-2026-6165 CVE-2026-54908 GHSA-wg4g-wm44-ch5j\n  * GO-2026-6166 CVE-2026-56868\n  * GO-2026-6168 CVE-2026-56869\n  * GO-2026-6169 CVE-2026-56870\n  * GO-2026-6170 CVE-2026-56871\n  * GO-2026-6171 CVE-2026-56872\n  * GO-2026-6172 CVE-2026-56873\n  * GO-2026-6173 CVE-2026-56874\n  * GO-2026-6181 GHSA-gwfq-86j8-7qhv\n  * GO-2026-6182 CVE-2026-71312 GHSA-2m8m-jhrm-w6j2\n  * GO-2026-6183 GHSA-3x6r-wxxg-53vv\n  * GO-2026-6184 CVE-2026-71309 GHSA-45pq-889g-fcgh\n  * GO-2026-6185 CVE-2026-59732 GHSA-4vr5-p2gc-h23p\n  * GO-2026-6186 CVE-2026-71313 GHSA-7p4m-qxvv-g567\n  * GO-2026-6187 CVE-2026-71311 GHSA-8c48-q9wj-3w37\n  * GO-2026-6188 GHSA-8mxv-9xhp-86h4\n  * GO-2026-6189 GHSA-8v25-v8p6-qf7v\n  * GO-2026-6190 GHSA-945v-v9p3-v5xw\n  * GO-2026-6191 CVE-2026-54572 GHSA-cf44-9pgv-m4xc\n  * GO-2026-6192 CVE-2026-65602 GHSA-42cj-m3vj-89wv\n  * GO-2026-6195 CVE-2026-59733 GHSA-fqj9-69pf-6pjg\n  * GO-2026-6196 GHSA-gx4c-2hqx-cw2r\n  * GO-2026-6197 GHSA-h4mf-4v27-hggj\n  * GO-2026-6198 CVE-2026-65601 GHSA-qq9q-x9w4-chhj\n  * GO-2026-6199 CVE-2026-71310 GHSA-xhf4-832v-7xcr\n  * GO-2026-6201 CVE-2026-71324 GHSA-3ccp-42pg-hgv6\n  * GO-2026-6202 CVE-2026-54764 GHSA-3q9r-p662-5j8m\n  * GO-2026-6203 CVE-2026-71325 GHSA-62fc-8686-hfmq\n  * GO-2026-6204 CVE-2026-71326 GHSA-6765-c87h-8mrf\n  * GO-2026-6205 CVE-2026-54765 GHSA-6p8f-p8j2-rqmv\n  * GO-2026-6207 CVE-2026-67309 GHSA-8rxv-jg7p-wvg3\n  * GO-2026-6208 CVE-2026-65600 GHSA-cxjq-mrr5-89rv\n  * GO-2026-6209 CVE-2026-71327 GHSA-fgjj-px3w-67xx\n  * GO-2026-6211 CVE-2026-54763 GHSA-x677-9fxg-v5c5\n  * GO-2026-6212 CVE-2026-39904 GHSA-42jc-v69j-g38f\n  * GO-2026-6213 CVE-2026-71556 GHSA-hc8v-wwc9-vgxm\n  * GO-2026-6214 CVE-2026-71557 GHSA-qgq7-7hm3-q39j\n  * GO-2026-6216\n  * GO-2026-6219 CVE-2026-73080 GHSA-87fv-vqqr-m4jr\n  * GO-2026-6220 CVE-2026-48786 GHSA-88p2-jj8w-j8qg\n  * GO-2026-6221 CVE-2026-54917 GHSA-w62w-66v9-vvgv\n  * GO-2026-6223 CVE-2026-54526 GHSA-48p8-g2fx-3wwm\n  * GO-2026-6224 CVE-2026-53469 GHSA-6xvf-9742-48w2\n  * GO-2026-6227 CVE-2026-35511 GHSA-29rf-f4vv-pvq6\n  * GO-2026-6228 CVE-2026-53471 GHSA-2fqw-7c6r-2cq6\n  * GO-2026-6229 CVE-2026-53470 GHSA-v5m8-5455-qw2x\n  * GO-2026-6230 CVE-2026-53657 GHSA-2j9v-p4xj-cjw2\n  * GO-2026-6231 CVE-2026-53476 GHSA-7j4w-x8x8-5mvg\n  * GO-2026-6232 CVE-2026-53475 GHSA-8g5p-jxp9-457c\n  * GO-2026-6233 CVE-2026-53474 GHSA-vf2h-7x3w-97fr\n  * GO-2026-6234 CVE-2026-53658 GHSA-xghw-p77p-3r7x\n  * GO-2026-6237\n  * GO-2026-6238 CVE-2026-10722 GHSA-xhgw-qwwf-pg32\n  * GO-2026-6240 CVE-2026-64859 GHSA-6x2c-phff-wx57\n  * GO-2026-6241 CVE-2026-45099 GHSA-8394-6f8r-whxg\n  * GO-2026-6242 CVE-2026-71479 GHSA-8r8v-xf7q-rcpr\n  * GO-2026-6243 CVE-2026-64865 GHSA-j6gc-4893-qwmp\n  * GO-2026-6244 CVE-2026-64866 GHSA-p845-629j-rcj6\n  * GO-2026-6245 CVE-2026-64868 GHSA-v828-m3pf-vq9q\n  * GO-2026-6246 GHSA-fhgh-wq4q-r37x\n  * GO-2026-6247 CVE-2026-55062 GHSA-m6jg-wr9m-cg2f\n  * GO-2026-6248 CVE-2026-55061 GHSA-qmcq-xw74-w667\n  * GO-2026-6249 CVE-2026-25700 GHSA-4gw2-vg4x-7p29\n\n- Update to version 0.0.20260814T162254 2026-08-14T16:22:54Z.\n\n  Go CVE Numbering Authority IDs added or updated with aliases:\n\n  * GO-2026-5021 CVE-2026-42508 GHSA-5cgq-3rg8-m6cv\n  * GO-2026-5942 CVE-2026-46600\n  * GO-2026-5972 CVE-2026-33818\n  * GO-2026-6088 CVE-2026-56859\n  * GO-2026-6089 CVE-2026-56853\n  * GO-2026-6090 CVE-2026-56862\n  * GO-2026-6091 CVE-2026-56858\n  * GO-2026-6179 CVE-2026-56865\n  * GO-2026-6180 CVE-2026-56864\n  * GO-2026-6218 CVE-2026-56860\n  * GO-2026-6222 CVE-2026-46603\n\n- Update to version 0.0.20260811T232133 2026-08-11T23:21:33Z.\n\n  Go CVE Numbering Authority IDs added or updated with aliases:\n\n  * GO-2026-5005 CVE-2026-39833 GHSA-jppx-rxg9-jmrx\n  * GO-2026-5006 CVE-2026-39832 GHSA-f5wc-c3c7-36mc\n  * GO-2026-5075 CVE-2026-57210 GHSA-38x9-25wx-7fg2\n  * GO-2026-5119 CVE-2026-48119 GHSA-4g6j-g789-rghm\n  * GO-2026-5152 CVE-2026-48491 GHSA-5r4w-85f3-pw66\n  * GO-2026-5274 CVE-2026-40173 GHSA-95mq-xwj4-r47p\n  * GO-2026-5287 CVE-2026-53622 GHSA-9cr8-q42q-g8m7\n  * GO-2026-5306 CVE-2026-34179 GHSA-c3h3-89qf-jqm5\n  * GO-2026-5368 CVE-2026-34177 GHSA-fm2x-c5qw-4h6f\n  * GO-2026-5466 CVE-2026-41179 GHSA-jfwf-28xr-xw6q\n  * GO-2026-5516 CVE-2026-41327 GHSA-mrxx-39g5-ph77\n  * GO-2026-5529 CVE-2026-34976 GHSA-p5rh-vmhp-gvcw\n  * GO-2026-5532 CVE-2026-41181 GHSA-p6hg-qh38-555r\n  * GO-2026-5576 CVE-2026-34178 GHSA-q96j-3fmm-7fv4\n  * GO-2026-5596 CVE-2026-49980 GHSA-qw24-gh76-8rvv\n  * GO-2026-5668 CVE-2026-41568 GHSA-vp62-88p7-qqf5\n  * GO-2026-5970 CVE-2026-56852\n","status":"published","published":"2026-09-04T12:30:23Z","modified":"2026-09-09T18:23:14.573173825Z","updated_at":"2026-11-02T16:58:42.426393Z"},{"id":"SUSE-SU-2026:23625-1","title":"Security update for govulncheck-vulndb","description":"This update for govulncheck-vulndb fixes the following issues:\n\n- Update to version 0.0.20260827T195228 2026-08-27T19:52:28Z (jsc#PED-11136).\n\n  Go CVE Numbering Authority IDs added or updated with aliases:\n\n  * GO-2026-5026 CVE-2026-39821\n  * GO-2026-6225\n  * GO-2026-6250 CVE-2026-63328 GHSA-8rc5-4fr6-64pw\n  * GO-2026-6253 CVE-2026-17106 GHSA-hfg8-hc9c-6c3h\n  * GO-2026-6254 CVE-2026-53941 GHSA-vjhx-2cqw-3q6q\n  * GO-2026-6255 CVE-2026-61711 GHSA-7236-3392-c5c6\n  * GO-2026-6256 CVE-2026-61712 GHSA-72x6-4j93-7w86\n  * GO-2026-6258 CVE-2026-45404 GHSA-42cj-99w8-cp2p\n  * GO-2026-6259 CVE-2026-32637 GHSA-j2g6-362q-6qc6\n  * GO-2026-6260 CVE-2026-55149 GHSA-qqff-5854-px68\n  * GO-2026-6261 CVE-2026-54061 GHSA-rrwh-6jrq-wp5v\n  * GO-2026-6262 GHSA-22w5-2fxg-vrwx\n  * GO-2026-6263 CVE-2026-54168 GHSA-6f2p-296r-cc28\n  * GO-2026-6264 CVE-2026-54245 GHSA-7q96-f8xw-jv5j\n  * GO-2026-6265 GHSA-8fxq-53rx-ph5f\n  * GO-2026-6266 CVE-2026-54167 GHSA-f5f4-3hh4-f54m\n  * GO-2026-6267 GHSA-h58c-xccx-75m3\n  * GO-2026-6268 GHSA-q9c5-pp7m-fm2g\n  * GO-2026-6269 GHSA-rxhg-vcww-2mpw\n  * GO-2026-6270 CVE-2026-54162 GHSA-x3g7-qrwc-f6c5\n  * GO-2026-6271 CVE-2026-67448 GHSA-8r62-w5wh-fc5m\n  * GO-2026-6272 CVE-2026-67447 GHSA-r553-m4fv-5v97\n  * GO-2026-6273 CVE-2026-64679 GHSA-26w5-6g95-gj28\n  * GO-2026-6274 CVE-2026-76905 GHSA-mmfr-pmjx-hw9w\n  * GO-2026-6275 CVE-2026-77354 GHSA-xhj3-7xw9-vr34\n  * GO-2026-6277 GHSA-4ph6-mjv7-3fq6\n  * GO-2026-6278 GHSA-w67g-5rqw-f597\n  * GO-2026-6279 CVE-2026-6046 GHSA-3vmp-whvv-5v9v\n  * GO-2026-6280 CVE-2026-7387 GHSA-6hxm-w4hv-vgvw\n  * GO-2026-6281 CVE-2026-6961 GHSA-8qq9-cqj8-82w4\n  * GO-2026-6282 CVE-2026-7184 GHSA-9p44-r552-4wp9\n  * GO-2026-6283 CVE-2026-6689 GHSA-c28q-m4gf-vg4q\n  * GO-2026-6284 CVE-2026-55477 GHSA-jm48-m3rr-9hgg\n  * GO-2026-6285 CVE-2026-6739 GHSA-m2w9-h2mm-79qr\n  * GO-2026-6286 CVE-2026-3433 GHSA-rp4v-qc77-phm4\n  * GO-2026-6287 GHSA-vx2m-jpxr-xv7w\n  * GO-2026-6288 CVE-2026-11624 GHSA-76g7-m3xw-x9gr\n  * GO-2026-6289 GHSA-w8j7-39hp-8x59\n  * GO-2026-6290 CVE-2026-55581 GHSA-3x77-wg38-92r3\n  * GO-2026-6291 CVE-2026-55582 GHSA-74hp-mggr-hv58\n  * GO-2026-6292 CVE-2026-55580 GHSA-f5pj-2738-996m\n  * GO-2026-6293 CVE-2026-55677 GHSA-vfp3-v2gw-7wfq\n  * GO-2026-6294 CVE-2026-55092 GHSA-mcj4-mphf-j9ff\n  * GO-2026-6295 CVE-2026-55637 GHSA-cmwv-wf9p-p8wx\n  * GO-2026-6296 CVE-2026-54523 GHSA-79gf-7frw-68m9\n  * GO-2026-6297 CVE-2026-50879 GHSA-g743-m6x3-v6wm\n  * GO-2026-6298 CVE-2026-54563 GHSA-w5fv-7x5q-g8qp\n  * GO-2026-6299 CVE-2026-50884 GHSA-5442-mh7f-72px\n  * GO-2026-6300 CVE-2026-50891 GHSA-rcqf-cpv9-g5jf\n  * GO-2026-6301 CVE-2026-42350 GHSA-g7gw-m874-7rmf\n\n- Update to version 0.0.20260819T170606 2026-08-19T17:06:06Z.\n\n  Go CVE Numbering Authority IDs added or updated with aliases:\n\n  * GO-2026-4720 GHSA-v3mg-9v85-fcm7\n  * GO-2026-4942 CVE-2026-35172 GHSA-f2g3-hh2r-cwgc\n  * GO-2026-4950\n  * GO-2026-6093 GHSA-464c-974j-9xm6\n  * GO-2026-6094 GHSA-gcjh-h69q-9w9g\n  * GO-2026-6095 GHSA-r277-6w6q-xmqw\n  * GO-2026-6097 CVE-2026-55495 GHSA-49h3-cwhj-4737\n  * GO-2026-6098 CVE-2026-55496 GHSA-8r7f-r8hj-r3rv\n  * GO-2026-6099 CVE-2026-57497 GHSA-g35j-m5xg-vh3q\n  * GO-2026-6100 CVE-2026-55497 GHSA-g9j2-8w95-3vwv\n  * GO-2026-6101 CVE-2026-55502 GHSA-hq88-5x99-x3gf\n  * GO-2026-6102 CVE-2026-55499 GHSA-w8x7-h2px-xmq8\n  * GO-2026-6103 CVE-2026-73564 GHSA-26gq-p25f-99cp\n  * GO-2026-6104 CVE-2026-62323 GHSA-c3jm-gv5r-9wcp\n  * GO-2026-6105 GHSA-c534-2w9c-x7fm\n  * GO-2026-6106 GHSA-v6w6-358x-2433\n  * GO-2026-6107 CVE-2026-73500 GHSA-6vch-q96h-7gc3\n  * GO-2026-6108 CVE-2026-73505 GHSA-6xj8-qv9j-xcjq\n  * GO-2026-6109 GHSA-86cx-wwf4-phq4\n  * GO-2026-6110 CVE-2026-73509 GHSA-95cv-r8x4-vh75\n  * GO-2026-6111 CVE-2026-73506 GHSA-fwjx-9p69-h25h\n  * GO-2026-6112 CVE-2026-73502 GHSA-jpcw-4wr7-c3vq\n  * GO-2026-6113 GHSA-p6ph-3jx2-3337\n  * GO-2026-6114 CVE-2026-73499 GHSA-xg4h-6gfc-h4m8\n  * GO-2026-6115 CVE-2026-56867\n  * GO-2026-6117 GHSA-hp74-gm6m-2qm5\n  * GO-2026-6118 CVE-2026-47427 GHSA-w4q6-qw23-4rg7\n  * GO-2026-6119 CVE-2026-43983 GHSA-w6p7-2fxx-4f44\n  * GO-2026-6120 CVE-2026-54593 GHSA-8r6w-3qq5-4p4r\n  * GO-2026-6121 CVE-2026-54345 GHSA-6r28-9ppf-4hj5\n  * GO-2026-6122 CVE-2026-54332 GHSA-g6v3-7xmc-w563\n  * GO-2026-6123 CVE-2026-49446 GHSA-2rx5-2g7j-2659\n  * GO-2026-6124 CVE-2026-49447 GHSA-5fqm-cc34-fcf5\n  * GO-2026-6125 CVE-2026-11479 GHSA-6h35-9p2w-3j3r\n  * GO-2026-6126 CVE-2026-11465 GHSA-7v3v-cp44-vc8m\n  * GO-2026-6127 CVE-2026-50567 GHSA-q6vm-xqc9-v3ff\n  * GO-2026-6128 CVE-2026-11481 GHSA-q76h-p6jh-9rw3\n  * GO-2026-6129 CVE-2026-50570 GHSA-qf5v-m7p4-95rp\n  * GO-2026-6130 CVE-2026-50568 GHSA-r5jh-q2mw-gcx4\n  * GO-2026-6131 CVE-2026-50569 GHSA-vchh-r53j-8mpw\n  * GO-2026-6132 CVE-2026-62325 GHSA-rjrw-mjq6-hpmm\n  * GO-2026-6133 CVE-2026-54719 GHSA-rmxw-pq4x-3fvh\n  * GO-2026-6134 CVE-2026-66064 GHSA-964w-f6gj-5236\n  * GO-2026-6135 CVE-2026-54650 GHSA-fh2f-xfxc-q9cc\n  * GO-2026-6136 CVE-2026-64863 GHSA-hq33-8jgp-8qq3\n  * GO-2026-6137 CVE-2026-66063 GHSA-wg2q-39h6-66x9\n  * GO-2026-6138 CVE-2026-54638 GHSA-whmm-qj9r-wvr2\n  * GO-2026-6139 CVE-2026-54735 GHSA-4p3g-4hcj-wpvx\n  * GO-2026-6140 CVE-2026-11500 GHSA-jqpm-wf57-qx5c\n  * GO-2026-6141 CVE-2026-54693 GHSA-jq8w-8q2f-ffm9\n  * GO-2026-6142 CVE-2026-54680 GHSA-mjqf-28ph-426h\n  * GO-2026-6143 GHSA-xvg2-cgv6-6h7v\n  * GO-2026-6144 CVE-2026-67439 GHSA-jm28-2wcr-qf3h\n  * GO-2026-6145 CVE-2026-67438 GHSA-xc5w-4v5w-7x65\n  * GO-2026-6146 CVE-2026-67437 GHSA-xpxj-f2fm-rqch\n  * GO-2026-6147 CVE-2026-25688 GHSA-hmr2-99jm-8x45\n  * GO-2026-6148 CVE-2026-25699 GHSA-w754-5646-xq9j\n  * GO-2026-6151 CVE-2026-34033 GHSA-6qwm-5fm9-cvjx\n  * GO-2026-6152 CVE-2026-34905 GHSA-85r2-pvg8-89r9\n  * GO-2026-6153 CVE-2026-33582 GHSA-v553-g2w6-295p\n  * GO-2026-6154 CVE-2026-34031 GHSA-x4f6-mqg6-28xx\n  * GO-2026-6155 CVE-2026-65834 GHSA-68cj-mvg9-rgm2\n  * GO-2026-6156 CVE-2026-52856 GHSA-ghrq-5wpp-hxx5\n  * GO-2026-6157 CVE-2026-65835 GHSA-jr6p-8pjj-mfx6\n  * GO-2026-6158 CVE-2026-52855 GHSA-pfvc-3p5h-x7h6\n  * GO-2026-6159 CVE-2026-52857 GHSA-q6hh-gp44-4hcm\n  * GO-2026-6160 CVE-2026-54725 GHSA-r2v3-8gwf-7ghm\n  * GO-2026-6161 CVE-2026-53551 GHSA-qj55-47fp-p62j\n  * GO-2026-6162 CVE-2026-54787 GHSA-wqqc-jjcq-vfxm\n  * GO-2026-6163 CVE-2026-54909 GHSA-34rh-wp3j-6cxc\n  * GO-2026-6164 CVE-2026-54910 GHSA-vvp7-h4fj-m28w\n  * GO-2026-6165 CVE-2026-54908 GHSA-wg4g-wm44-ch5j\n  * GO-2026-6166 CVE-2026-56868\n  * GO-2026-6168 CVE-2026-56869\n  * GO-2026-6169 CVE-2026-56870\n  * GO-2026-6170 CVE-2026-56871\n  * GO-2026-6171 CVE-2026-56872\n  * GO-2026-6172 CVE-2026-56873\n  * GO-2026-6173 CVE-2026-56874\n  * GO-2026-6181 GHSA-gwfq-86j8-7qhv\n  * GO-2026-6182 CVE-2026-71312 GHSA-2m8m-jhrm-w6j2\n  * GO-2026-6183 GHSA-3x6r-wxxg-53vv\n  * GO-2026-6184 CVE-2026-71309 GHSA-45pq-889g-fcgh\n  * GO-2026-6185 CVE-2026-59732 GHSA-4vr5-p2gc-h23p\n  * GO-2026-6186 CVE-2026-71313 GHSA-7p4m-qxvv-g567\n  * GO-2026-6187 CVE-2026-71311 GHSA-8c48-q9wj-3w37\n  * GO-2026-6188 GHSA-8mxv-9xhp-86h4\n  * GO-2026-6189 GHSA-8v25-v8p6-qf7v\n  * GO-2026-6190 GHSA-945v-v9p3-v5xw\n  * GO-2026-6191 CVE-2026-54572 GHSA-cf44-9pgv-m4xc\n  * GO-2026-6192 CVE-2026-65602 GHSA-42cj-m3vj-89wv\n  * GO-2026-6195 CVE-2026-59733 GHSA-fqj9-69pf-6pjg\n  * GO-2026-6196 GHSA-gx4c-2hqx-cw2r\n  * GO-2026-6197 GHSA-h4mf-4v27-hggj\n  * GO-2026-6198 CVE-2026-65601 GHSA-qq9q-x9w4-chhj\n  * GO-2026-6199 CVE-2026-71310 GHSA-xhf4-832v-7xcr\n  * GO-2026-6201 CVE-2026-71324 GHSA-3ccp-42pg-hgv6\n  * GO-2026-6202 CVE-2026-54764 GHSA-3q9r-p662-5j8m\n  * GO-2026-6203 CVE-2026-71325 GHSA-62fc-8686-hfmq\n  * GO-2026-6204 CVE-2026-71326 GHSA-6765-c87h-8mrf\n  * GO-2026-6205 CVE-2026-54765 GHSA-6p8f-p8j2-rqmv\n  * GO-2026-6207 CVE-2026-67309 GHSA-8rxv-jg7p-wvg3\n  * GO-2026-6208 CVE-2026-65600 GHSA-cxjq-mrr5-89rv\n  * GO-2026-6209 CVE-2026-71327 GHSA-fgjj-px3w-67xx\n  * GO-2026-6211 CVE-2026-54763 GHSA-x677-9fxg-v5c5\n  * GO-2026-6212 CVE-2026-39904 GHSA-42jc-v69j-g38f\n  * GO-2026-6213 CVE-2026-71556 GHSA-hc8v-wwc9-vgxm\n  * GO-2026-6214 CVE-2026-71557 GHSA-qgq7-7hm3-q39j\n  * GO-2026-6216\n  * GO-2026-6219 CVE-2026-73080 GHSA-87fv-vqqr-m4jr\n  * GO-2026-6220 CVE-2026-48786 GHSA-88p2-jj8w-j8qg\n  * GO-2026-6221 CVE-2026-54917 GHSA-w62w-66v9-vvgv\n  * GO-2026-6223 CVE-2026-54526 GHSA-48p8-g2fx-3wwm\n  * GO-2026-6224 CVE-2026-53469 GHSA-6xvf-9742-48w2\n  * GO-2026-6227 CVE-2026-35511 GHSA-29rf-f4vv-pvq6\n  * GO-2026-6228 CVE-2026-53471 GHSA-2fqw-7c6r-2cq6\n  * GO-2026-6229 CVE-2026-53470 GHSA-v5m8-5455-qw2x\n  * GO-2026-6230 CVE-2026-53657 GHSA-2j9v-p4xj-cjw2\n  * GO-2026-6231 CVE-2026-53476 GHSA-7j4w-x8x8-5mvg\n  * GO-2026-6232 CVE-2026-53475 GHSA-8g5p-jxp9-457c\n  * GO-2026-6233 CVE-2026-53474 GHSA-vf2h-7x3w-97fr\n  * GO-2026-6234 CVE-2026-53658 GHSA-xghw-p77p-3r7x\n  * GO-2026-6237\n  * GO-2026-6238 CVE-2026-10722 GHSA-xhgw-qwwf-pg32\n  * GO-2026-6240 CVE-2026-64859 GHSA-6x2c-phff-wx57\n  * GO-2026-6241 CVE-2026-45099 GHSA-8394-6f8r-whxg\n  * GO-2026-6242 CVE-2026-71479 GHSA-8r8v-xf7q-rcpr\n  * GO-2026-6243 CVE-2026-64865 GHSA-j6gc-4893-qwmp\n  * GO-2026-6244 CVE-2026-64866 GHSA-p845-629j-rcj6\n  * GO-2026-6245 CVE-2026-64868 GHSA-v828-m3pf-vq9q\n  * GO-2026-6246 GHSA-fhgh-wq4q-r37x\n  * GO-2026-6247 CVE-2026-55062 GHSA-m6jg-wr9m-cg2f\n  * GO-2026-6248 CVE-2026-55061 GHSA-qmcq-xw74-w667\n  * GO-2026-6249 CVE-2026-25700 GHSA-4gw2-vg4x-7p29\n\n- Update to version 0.0.20260814T162254 2026-08-14T16:22:54Z.\n\n  Go CVE Numbering Authority IDs added or updated with aliases:\n\n  * GO-2026-5021 CVE-2026-42508 GHSA-5cgq-3rg8-m6cv\n  * GO-2026-5942 CVE-2026-46600\n  * GO-2026-5972 CVE-2026-33818\n  * GO-2026-6088 CVE-2026-56859\n  * GO-2026-6089 CVE-2026-56853\n  * GO-2026-6090 CVE-2026-56862\n  * GO-2026-6091 CVE-2026-56858\n  * GO-2026-6179 CVE-2026-56865\n  * GO-2026-6180 CVE-2026-56864\n  * GO-2026-6218 CVE-2026-56860\n  * GO-2026-6222 CVE-2026-46603\n\n- Update to version 0.0.20260811T232133 2026-08-11T23:21:33Z.\n\n  Go CVE Numbering Authority IDs added or updated with aliases:\n\n  * GO-2026-5005 CVE-2026-39833 GHSA-jppx-rxg9-jmrx\n  * GO-2026-5006 CVE-2026-39832 GHSA-f5wc-c3c7-36mc\n  * GO-2026-5075 CVE-2026-57210 GHSA-38x9-25wx-7fg2\n  * GO-2026-5119 CVE-2026-48119 GHSA-4g6j-g789-rghm\n  * GO-2026-5152 CVE-2026-48491 GHSA-5r4w-85f3-pw66\n  * GO-2026-5274 CVE-2026-40173 GHSA-95mq-xwj4-r47p\n  * GO-2026-5287 CVE-2026-53622 GHSA-9cr8-q42q-g8m7\n  * GO-2026-5306 CVE-2026-34179 GHSA-c3h3-89qf-jqm5\n  * GO-2026-5368 CVE-2026-34177 GHSA-fm2x-c5qw-4h6f\n  * GO-2026-5466 CVE-2026-41179 GHSA-jfwf-28xr-xw6q\n  * GO-2026-5516 CVE-2026-41327 GHSA-mrxx-39g5-ph77\n  * GO-2026-5529 CVE-2026-34976 GHSA-p5rh-vmhp-gvcw\n  * GO-2026-5532 CVE-2026-41181 GHSA-p6hg-qh38-555r\n  * GO-2026-5576 CVE-2026-34178 GHSA-q96j-3fmm-7fv4\n  * GO-2026-5596 CVE-2026-49980 GHSA-qw24-gh76-8rvv\n  * GO-2026-5668 CVE-2026-41568 GHSA-vp62-88p7-qqf5\n  * GO-2026-5970 CVE-2026-56852\n","status":"published","published":"2026-09-04T12:32:03Z","modified":"2026-09-29T18:23:20.110594263Z","updated_at":"2026-11-02T15:54:03.991985Z"}]}}