{"id":"CVE-2026-88046","aliases":["BIT-rclone-2026-88046","DEBIAN-CVE-2026-88046","EUVD-2026-75589","GHSA-38xv-hf3p-h7mq","GO-2026-6457","SUSE-SU-2026:23855-1","SUSE-SU-2026:23863-1","UBUNTU-CVE-2026-88046","openSUSE-SU-2026:21897-1"],"status":"published","title":"rclone: source object names can escape the configured root on upload","description":"rclone is a command-line program to sync files and directories to and from different cloud storage providers. Prior to 1.75.1, rclone core does not reject parent-directory segments in source Object.Remote() values before fs/list, fs/walk, fs/sync, and fs/operations pass those values to destination backends. A flat-keyspace source object store populated with native non-rclone tooling can contain a raw .. key segment, and affected b2, swift, qingstor, oracleobjectstorage, internetarchive, smb, storj, sftp, webdav, ftp, filelu, shade, and sia destinations use path.Join(root, remote) before EncodeDot can neutralize the segment. A copy or upload can therefore escape the configured root into another bucket, share, or path reachable by the victim credential, with sftp and smb potentially reaching other filesystem or share locations under the same login authority. This issue is fixed in version 1.75.1.","severity":{"version":"3.1","score":5.3,"vector":"CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N","level":"medium","assessor":"cna","from":"cve"},"epss":{"day":"2026-11-09","score":0.00294,"percentile":0.22221,"model":"v2026.06.15"},"facts":{"in_kev":false,"known_exploited":false,"public_exploit":false,"fix_available":true},"cwes":["CWE-22"],"published":"2026-09-10T16:14:49Z","modified":"2026-10-28T02:30:21Z","fixes":[{"ecosystem":"Go","package":"github.com/rclone/rclone","fixed_in":["1.75.1"],"sources":["ghsa","osv"]},{"ecosystem":"Bitnami","package":"rclone","fixed_in":["1.75.1"],"sources":["osv"]}],"affected":[{"source":"ghsa","ecosystem":"Go","package":"github.com/rclone/rclone","ranges":[{"type":"ECOSYSTEM","events":[{"introduced":"0"},{"fixed":"1.75.1"}]}]},{"source":"osv","ecosystem":"Bitnami","package":"rclone","ranges":[{"type":"SEMVER","events":[{"introduced":"0"},{"fixed":"1.75.1"}]}]},{"source":"osv","ecosystem":"Debian:12","package":"rclone","ranges":[{"type":"ECOSYSTEM","events":[{"introduced":"0"}]}],"versions":["1.60.1+dfsg-2","1.60.1+dfsg-3","1.60.1+dfsg-4","1.65.0+dfsg-1","1.65.0+dfsg-2","1.69.3+dfsg-1","1.69.3+dfsg-2","1.69.3+dfsg-3"]},{"source":"osv","ecosystem":"Debian:13","package":"rclone","ranges":[{"type":"ECOSYSTEM","events":[{"introduced":"0"}]}],"versions":["1.60.1+dfsg-4","1.65.0+dfsg-1","1.65.0+dfsg-2","1.69.3+dfsg-1","1.69.3+dfsg-2","1.69.3+dfsg-3"]},{"source":"osv","ecosystem":"Go","package":"github.com/rclone/rclone","ranges":[{"type":"SEMVER","events":[{"introduced":"0"},{"fixed":"1.75.1"}]}]},{"source":"osv","ecosystem":"Go","package":"github.com/rclone/rclone","ranges":[{"type":"SEMVER","events":[{"introduced":"0"},{"fixed":"1.75.1"}]}]},{"source":"osv","ecosystem":"SUSE:Linux Enterprise Server 16.0","package":"govulncheck-vulndb","ranges":[{"type":"ECOSYSTEM","events":[{"introduced":"0"},{"fixed":"0.0.20260916T180043-160000.1.1"}]}],"bundled":91},{"source":"osv","ecosystem":"SUSE:Linux Enterprise Server for SAP applications 16.0","package":"govulncheck-vulndb","ranges":[{"type":"ECOSYSTEM","events":[{"introduced":"0"},{"fixed":"0.0.20260916T180043-160000.1.1"}]}],"bundled":91},{"source":"osv","ecosystem":"SUSE:Linux Enterprise Server 16.0","package":"govulncheck-vulndb","ranges":[{"type":"ECOSYSTEM","events":[{"introduced":"0"},{"fixed":"0.0.20260916T180043-160000.1.1"}]}],"bundled":91},{"source":"osv","ecosystem":"SUSE:Linux Enterprise Server for SAP applications 16.0","package":"govulncheck-vulndb","ranges":[{"type":"ECOSYSTEM","events":[{"introduced":"0"},{"fixed":"0.0.20260916T180043-160000.1.1"}]}],"bundled":91},{"source":"osv","ecosystem":"Ubuntu:18.04:LTS","package":"rclone","ranges":[{"type":"ECOSYSTEM","events":[{"introduced":"0"}]}],"versions":["1.36-3","1.36-3ubuntu0.1","1.36-3ubuntu0.2"]},{"source":"osv","ecosystem":"Ubuntu:Pro:20.04:LTS","package":"rclone","ranges":[{"type":"ECOSYSTEM","events":[{"introduced":"0"}]}],"versions":["1.47.0+ex1-6","1.47.0+ex1-7","1.49.5-2","1.49.5-3","1.50.2-2","1.50.2-2ubuntu0.1","1.50.2-2ubuntu0.2","1.50.2-2ubuntu0.2+esm1"]},{"source":"osv","ecosystem":"Ubuntu:Pro:22.04:LTS","package":"rclone","ranges":[{"type":"ECOSYSTEM","events":[{"introduced":"0"}]}],"versions":["1.53.3-1","1.53.3-2","1.53.3-4","1.53.3-4ubuntu1","1.53.3-4ubuntu1.22.04.1","1.53.3-4ubuntu1.22.04.2","1.53.3-4ubuntu1.22.04.3","1.53.3-4ubuntu1.22.04.3+esm1","1.53.3-4ubuntu1.22.04.4","1.53.3-4ubuntu1.22.04.4+esm1","1.53.3-4ubuntu1.22.04.5","1.53.3-4ubuntu1.22.04.5+esm1"]},{"source":"osv","ecosystem":"Ubuntu:Pro:24.04:LTS","package":"rclone","ranges":[{"type":"ECOSYSTEM","events":[{"introduced":"0"}]}],"versions":["1.60.1+dfsg-2build1","1.60.1+dfsg-3","1.60.1+dfsg-3ubuntu0.24.04.1","1.60.1+dfsg-3ubuntu0.24.04.2","1.60.1+dfsg-3ubuntu0.24.04.3","1.60.1+dfsg-3ubuntu0.24.04.4","1.60.1+dfsg-3ubuntu0.24.04.4+esm1","1.60.1+dfsg-3ubuntu0.24.04.5","1.60.1+dfsg-3ubuntu0.24.04.5+esm1","1.60.1+dfsg-3ubuntu0.24.04.6","1.60.1+dfsg-3ubuntu0.24.04.6+esm1"]},{"source":"osv","ecosystem":"Ubuntu:26.10","package":"rclone","ranges":[{"type":"ECOSYSTEM","events":[{"introduced":"0"}]}],"versions":["1.60.1+dfsg-4ubuntu3","1.69.3+dfsg-3","1.69.3+dfsg-3ubuntu1"]},{"source":"osv","ecosystem":"Ubuntu:Pro:26.04:LTS","package":"rclone","ranges":[{"type":"ECOSYSTEM","events":[{"introduced":"0"}]}],"versions":["1.60.1+dfsg-4ubuntu2","1.60.1+dfsg-4ubuntu3","1.60.1+dfsg-4ubuntu3.1","1.60.1+dfsg-4ubuntu3.1+esm1","1.60.1+dfsg-4ubuntu3.2","1.60.1+dfsg-4ubuntu3.2+esm1"]},{"source":"osv","ecosystem":"openSUSE:Leap 16.0","package":"govulncheck-vulndb","ranges":[{"type":"ECOSYSTEM","events":[{"introduced":"0"},{"fixed":"0.0.20260916T180043-160000.1.1"}]}],"bundled":91}],"products":[{"vendor":"rclone","product":"rclone"}],"references":[{"url":"https://github.com/rclone/rclone/security/advisories/GHSA-38xv-hf3p-h7mq","tags":["x_refsource_CONFIRM","web","advisory"]},{"url":"https://github.com/rclone/rclone/commit/57842c5ee4e1407eda06a414a36510cce2db4252","tags":["x_refsource_MISC","web","fix"]},{"url":"https://github.com/rclone/rclone/releases/tag/v1.75.1","tags":["x_refsource_MISC","web"]},{"url":"https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-88046","tags":["web","advisory"]},{"url":"https://github.com/advisories/GHSA-38xv-hf3p-h7mq"},{"url":"https://github.com/CVEProject/cvelistV5/tree/main/cves/2026/88xxx/CVE-2026-88046.json","tags":["advisory"]},{"url":"https://security-tracker.debian.org/tracker/CVE-2026-88046","tags":["advisory"]},{"url":"https://github.com/rclone/rclone","tags":["package"]},{"url":"https://www.suse.com/support/update/announcement/2026/suse-su-202623855-1/","tags":["advisory"]},{"url":"https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2025-24978","tags":["web"]},{"url":"https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2025-24979","tags":["web"]},{"url":"https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2025-58363","tags":["web"]},{"url":"https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-11720","tags":["web"]},{"url":"https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-25782","tags":["web"]},{"url":"https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-26292","tags":["web"]},{"url":"https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-27660","tags":["web"]},{"url":"https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-27779","tags":["web"]},{"url":"https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-27780","tags":["web"]},{"url":"https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-53495","tags":["web"]},{"url":"https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-56665","tags":["web"]},{"url":"https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-56666","tags":["web"]},{"url":"https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-56668","tags":["web"]},{"url":"https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-56743","tags":["web"]},{"url":"https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-59157","tags":["web"]},{"url":"https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-59161","tags":["web"]},{"url":"https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-59162","tags":["web"]},{"url":"https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-59172","tags":["web"]},{"url":"https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-59185","tags":["web"]},{"url":"https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-59832","tags":["web"]},{"url":"https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-59834","tags":["web"]},{"url":"https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-60004","tags":["web"]},{"url":"https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-61625","tags":["web"]},{"url":"https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-65959","tags":["web"]},{"url":"https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-67445","tags":["web"]},{"url":"https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-67446","tags":["web"]},{"url":"https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-68584","tags":["web"]},{"url":"https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-68585","tags":["web"]},{"url":"https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-68586","tags":["web"]},{"url":"https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-68587","tags":["web"]},{"url":"https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-69083","tags":["web"]},{"url":"https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-69084","tags":["web"]},{"url":"https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-69086","tags":["web"]},{"url":"https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-71493","tags":["web"]},{"url":"https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-71494","tags":["web"]},{"url":"https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-72789","tags":["web"]},{"url":"https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-72790","tags":["web"]},{"url":"https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-72792","tags":["web"]},{"url":"https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-72793","tags":["web"]},{"url":"https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-72794","tags":["web"]},{"url":"https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-72795","tags":["web"]},{"url":"https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-72796","tags":["web"]},{"url":"https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-72797","tags":["web"]},{"url":"https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-72798","tags":["web"]},{"url":"https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-72799","tags":["web"]},{"url":"https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-72800","tags":["web"]},{"url":"https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-72801","tags":["web"]},{"url":"https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-72802","tags":["web"]},{"url":"https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-72803","tags":["web"]},{"url":"https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-72804","tags":["web"]},{"url":"https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-72805","tags":["web"]},{"url":"https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-72806","tags":["web"]},{"url":"https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-72807","tags":["web"]},{"url":"https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-72808","tags":["web"]},{"url":"https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-72809","tags":["web"]},{"url":"https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-72810","tags":["web"]},{"url":"https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-72811","tags":["web"]},{"url":"https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-72812","tags":["web"]},{"url":"https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-72920","tags":["web"]},{"url":"https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-72921","tags":["web"]},{"url":"https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-73087","tags":["web"]},{"url":"https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-73232","tags":["web"]},{"url":"https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-73292","tags":["web"]},{"url":"https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-73293","tags":["web"]},{"url":"https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-73294","tags":["web"]},{"url":"https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-73667","tags":["web"]},{"url":"https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-73840","tags":["web"]},{"url":"https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-73841","tags":["web"]},{"url":"https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-73842","tags":["web"]},{"url":"https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-73843","tags":["web"]},{"url":"https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-75602","tags":["web"]},{"url":"https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-76081","tags":["web"]},{"url":"https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-79921","tags":["web"]},{"url":"https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-84303","tags":["web"]},{"url":"https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-84304","tags":["web"]},{"url":"https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-84445","tags":["web"]},{"url":"https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-88004","tags":["web"]},{"url":"https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-88007","tags":["web"]},{"url":"https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-88008","tags":["web"]},{"url":"https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-88009","tags":["web"]},{"url":"https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-88011","tags":["web"]},{"url":"https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-88012","tags":["web"]},{"url":"https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-88013","tags":["web"]},{"url":"https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-88014","tags":["web"]},{"url":"https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-88015","tags":["web"]},{"url":"https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-88016","tags":["web"]},{"url":"https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-88017","tags":["web"]},{"url":"https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-88018","tags":["web"]},{"url":"https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-88044","tags":["web"]},{"url":"https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-88045","tags":["web"]},{"url":"https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-88046","tags":["web"]},{"url":"https://www.suse.com/support/update/announcement/2026/suse-su-202623863-1/","tags":["advisory"]},{"url":"https://ubuntu.com/security/CVE-2026-88046","tags":["report"]},{"url":"https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-88046","tags":["report"]},{"url":"","tags":["advisory"]}],"sources":{"cve":[{"id":"CVE-2026-88046","title":"rclone: source object names can escape the configured root on upload","description":"rclone is a command-line program to sync files and directories to and from different cloud storage providers. Prior to 1.75.1, rclone core does not reject parent-directory segments in source Object.Remote() values before fs/list, fs/walk, fs/sync, and fs/operations pass those values to destination backends. A flat-keyspace source object store populated with native non-rclone tooling can contain a raw .. key segment, and affected b2, swift, qingstor, oracleobjectstorage, internetarchive, smb, storj, sftp, webdav, ftp, filelu, shade, and sia destinations use path.Join(root, remote) before EncodeDot can neutralize the segment. A copy or upload can therefore escape the configured root into another bucket, share, or path reachable by the victim credential, with sftp and smb potentially reaching other filesystem or share locations under the same login authority. This issue is fixed in version 1.75.1.","status":"published","published":"2026-09-10T16:14:49.587Z","modified":"2026-09-15T14:47:32.868Z","cvss":[{"version":"3.1","score":5.3,"vector":"CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N","level":"medium","assessor":"cna"}],"cwes":["CWE-22"],"updated_at":"2026-11-02T13:41:53.237769Z"}],"euvd":[{"id":"EUVD-2026-75589","description":"rclone is a command-line program to sync files and directories to and from different cloud storage providers. Prior to 1.75.1, rclone core does not reject parent-directory segments in source Object.Remote() values before fs/list, fs/walk, fs/sync, and fs/operations pass those values to destination backends. A flat-keyspace source object store populated with native non-rclone tooling can contain a raw .. key segment, and affected b2, swift, qingstor, oracleobjectstorage, internetarchive, smb, storj, sftp, webdav, ftp, filelu, shade, and sia destinations use path.Join(root, remote) before EncodeDot can neutralize the segment. A copy or upload can therefore escape the configured root into another bucket, share, or path reachable by the victim credential, with sftp and smb potentially reaching other filesystem or share locations under the same login authority. This issue is fixed in version 1.75.1.","status":"published","published":"2026-09-10T16:14:49Z","modified":"2026-09-15T14:47:32Z","cvss":[{"version":"3.1","score":5.3,"vector":"CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N","level":"medium"}],"updated_at":"2026-11-02T17:28:18.105573Z"}],"ghsa":[{"id":"GHSA-38xv-hf3p-h7mq","title":"rclone: source object names can escape the configured root on upload","description":"### Summary\n\nMultiple backends, when given a specially crafted object to copy, can escape the backend confinement.\n\n| Backend | Keep/Close | Per-backend severity |\n|---|---|---|\n| sftp | Medium | Real filesystem escape, fires under default encoding. |\n| smb | Low-Medium | Escapes to a different SMB share the credential can reach. |\n| ftp | Low | Real, leading-`..` overshoot PoC is partly neutralized by encoding; escape bounded to at/below the login base. |\n| webdav | Low | Server-side ACLs are the real boundary. |\n| b2 | Low | Same-account sibling **bucket** crossing on a flat keyspace. |\n| swift | Low | Same, container. |\n| qingstor | Low | Same. |\n| oracleobjectstorage | Low | Same. |\n| internetarchive | Low | IA items are owner-writable only; confined to user's own items. |\n| storj | Low | Can retarget a different bucket in the same access grant. |\n| filelu | Low | Confined to the user's own account. |\n| shade | Low | Confined to the user's own drive. |\n| sia | Low | siad API password already grants full-daemon access. |\n\n## Root cause\n\nrclone core does **not** sanitize `..` in a source object's `Remote()` - verified: nothing in `fs/march`, `fs/sync`, `fs/list`, or `fs/operations` rejects `..` segments before the name reaches the destination backend's `Put`/`Update`/`Mkdir`. Confinement is therefore each backend's responsibility, and these backends join `root + remote` without a check.\n\nThis divides into two classes:\n\n- **Bucket based backends** - `bucket.Split(path.Join(f.root, rootRelativePath))`:\n  - `backend/b2/b2.go:404`, `backend/swift/swift.go:464`, `backend/qingstor/qingstor.go:198`, `backend/oracleobjectstorage/oracleobjectstorage.go:245`, `backend/internetarchive/internetarchive.go:1016`, `backend/smb/smb.go:885`, `backend/storj/fs.go:289`.\n  - `path.Join` collapses `..` on the standard (ASCII) form **before** encoding is applied (e.g. `FromStandardPath(path.Join(...))` at `backend/b2/b2.go:1641`), so `EncodeDot` never gets the chance to neutralize the `..`.\n  - `lib/bucket.Join` does **not** clean paths (keeps `..` as a literal key segment); `path.Join` does. `backend/s3`, `backend/azureblob`, `backend/googlecloudstorage` already use `bucket.Join` and are therefore not affected.\n\n- **Path based backends** - `path.Join(root, remote)` onto a real path:\n  - sftp: `remotePath = path.Join(f.absRoot, f.opt.Enc.FromStandardPath(remote))` (`backend/sftp/sftp.go:2497`). Default encoding is `encoder.Display` (== `Standard`), and `FromStandardPath` short-circuits to a pass-through in that mode, so `..` survives; `f.absRoot` is absolute, so `path.Join(\"/home/user/root\", \"../../../../etc/passwd\")` -\u003e `/etc/passwd`.\n  - webdav: `filePath` at `backend/webdav/webdav.go:426-432`.\n  - ftp: `path.Join(f.root, remote)` at ~14 sites (e.g. `backend/ftp/ftp.go:1247`).\n  - filelu, shade, sia: analogous joins.\n\n### Precondition that limits reachability\n\nFor any of these to fire, a **source** must hand rclone a `Remote()` containing raw `..`. That is only possible when:\n\n1. the source is a **flat-keyspace object store** (not a filesystem - a local/sftp/smb source cannot represent `../../x` as one directory entry), **and**\n2. the offending key was written with **native, non-rclone tooling** - rclone's own writer applies `EncodeDot` and rewrites a `..` segment to fullwidth `．．`, so you cannot create such a key *through rclone*.\n\nrclone's source-side listing does pass a natively-planted raw `..` key through unchanged (verified for b2: `remote := file.Name[len(prefix):]` after `ToStandardPath`, `backend/b2/b2.go:858,867`). The reports never establish this precondition; it is the same omission across every member of the class.\n\n### Example attack\n\n```bash\n# Step 1 - attacker, using NATIVE S3 tooling (NOT rclone) on a source the victim ingests from:\naws s3api put-object --bucket shared-drop --key '../../victim-backups/pwned.txt' --body evil.txt\n\n# Step 2 - victim's ordinary ingest:\nrclone copy s3-drop:shared-drop b2:victim-uploads/incoming\n# path.Join(\"victim-uploads/incoming\", \"../../victim-backups/pwned.txt\") = \"victim-backups/pwned.txt\"\n# -\u003e lands in the victim's victim-backups bucket instead of under incoming/\n```\n\nThe blast radius is the victim's **own** account (a bucket/share/path the configured credential already reaches) - integrity misdirection, not a cross-tenant or confidentiality breach. sftp/smb are the exception in *reach* (server filesystem / other share), still bounded by the login's own permissions.\n\n## Precedent\n\nThis is the same class as the already-fixed local backend advisory [https://github.com/rclone/rclone/security/advisories/GHSA-7p4m-qxvv-g567](GHSA-7p4m-qxvv-g567), which added `(*Fs).localPath` returning `errPathEscapes` for names resolving outside the root (`backend/local/local.go:819-826`). That fix was justified because the destination was the operator's own OS filesystem; the same reasoning extends (at lower severity) to sftp/smb.","status":"published","published":"2026-09-10T22:45:36Z","modified":"2026-09-10T22:45:37Z","cvss":[{"version":"3.1","score":5.3,"vector":"CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N","level":"medium"}],"cwes":["CWE-22"],"updated_at":"2026-11-02T14:41:15.803194Z"}],"nvd":[{"id":"CVE-2026-88046","description":"rclone is a command-line program to sync files and directories to and from different cloud storage providers. Prior to 1.75.1, rclone core does not reject parent-directory segments in source Object.Remote() values before fs/list, fs/walk, fs/sync, and fs/operations pass those values to destination backends. A flat-keyspace source object store populated with native non-rclone tooling can contain a raw .. key segment, and affected b2, swift, qingstor, oracleobjectstorage, internetarchive, smb, storj, sftp, webdav, ftp, filelu, shade, and sia destinations use path.Join(root, remote) before EncodeDot can neutralize the segment. A copy or upload can therefore escape the configured root into another bucket, share, or path reachable by the victim credential, with sftp and smb potentially reaching other filesystem or share locations under the same login authority. This issue is fixed in version 1.75.1.","status":"published","published":"2026-09-10T17:17:08.677Z","modified":"2026-09-15T15:17:24.44Z","cvss":[{"version":"3.1","score":5.3,"vector":"CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N","level":"medium","assessor":"secondary"}],"cwes":["CWE-22"],"updated_at":"2026-11-02T14:12:46.271848Z"}],"osv":[{"id":"CVE-2026-88046","title":"rclone: source object names can escape the configured root on upload","description":"rclone is a command-line program to sync files and directories to and from different cloud storage providers. Prior to 1.75.1, rclone core does not reject parent-directory segments in source Object.Remote() values before fs/list, fs/walk, fs/sync, and fs/operations pass those values to destination backends. A flat-keyspace source object store populated with native non-rclone tooling can contain a raw .. key segment, and affected b2, swift, qingstor, oracleobjectstorage, internetarchive, smb, storj, sftp, webdav, ftp, filelu, shade, and sia destinations use path.Join(root, remote) before EncodeDot can neutralize the segment. A copy or upload can therefore escape the configured root into another bucket, share, or path reachable by the victim credential, with sftp and smb potentially reaching other filesystem or share locations under the same login authority. This issue is fixed in version 1.75.1.","status":"published","published":"2026-09-10T16:14:49.587Z","modified":"2026-10-28T02:30:21.357024078Z","cvss":[{"version":"3.1","score":5.3,"vector":"CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N","level":"medium"}],"cwes":["CWE-22"],"updated_at":"2026-11-02T15:45:19.210277Z"},{"id":"DEBIAN-CVE-2026-88046","description":"rclone is a command-line program to sync files and directories to and from different cloud storage providers. Prior to 1.75.1, rclone core does not reject parent-directory segments in source Object.Remote() values before fs/list, fs/walk, fs/sync, and fs/operations pass those values to destination backends. A flat-keyspace source object store populated with native non-rclone tooling can contain a raw .. key segment, and affected b2, swift, qingstor, oracleobjectstorage, internetarchive, smb, storj, sftp, webdav, ftp, filelu, shade, and sia destinations use path.Join(root, remote) before EncodeDot can neutralize the segment. A copy or upload can therefore escape the configured root into another bucket, share, or path reachable by the victim credential, with sftp and smb potentially reaching other filesystem or share locations under the same login authority. This issue is fixed in version 1.75.1.","status":"published","published":"2026-09-10T17:17:08.677Z","modified":"2026-10-01T03:03:52.193247137Z","cvss":[{"version":"3.1","score":5.3,"vector":"CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N","level":"medium"}],"updated_at":"2026-11-02T15:46:05.506112Z"},{"id":"GHSA-38xv-hf3p-h7mq","title":"rclone: source object names can escape the configured root on upload","description":"### Summary\n\nMultiple backends, when given a specially crafted object to copy, can escape the backend confinement.\n\n| Backend | Keep/Close | Per-backend severity |\n|---|---|---|\n| sftp | Medium | Real filesystem escape, fires under default encoding. |\n| smb | Low-Medium | Escapes to a different SMB share the credential can reach. |\n| ftp | Low | Real, leading-`..` overshoot PoC is partly neutralized by encoding; escape bounded to at/below the login base. |\n| webdav | Low | Server-side ACLs are the real boundary. |\n| b2 | Low | Same-account sibling **bucket** crossing on a flat keyspace. |\n| swift | Low | Same, container. |\n| qingstor | Low | Same. |\n| oracleobjectstorage | Low | Same. |\n| internetarchive | Low | IA items are owner-writable only; confined to user's own items. |\n| storj | Low | Can retarget a different bucket in the same access grant. |\n| filelu | Low | Confined to the user's own account. |\n| shade | Low | Confined to the user's own drive. |\n| sia | Low | siad API password already grants full-daemon access. |\n\n## Root cause\n\nrclone core does **not** sanitize `..` in a source object's `Remote()` - verified: nothing in `fs/march`, `fs/sync`, `fs/list`, or `fs/operations` rejects `..` segments before the name reaches the destination backend's `Put`/`Update`/`Mkdir`. Confinement is therefore each backend's responsibility, and these backends join `root + remote` without a check.\n\nThis divides into two classes:\n\n- **Bucket based backends** - `bucket.Split(path.Join(f.root, rootRelativePath))`:\n  - `backend/b2/b2.go:404`, `backend/swift/swift.go:464`, `backend/qingstor/qingstor.go:198`, `backend/oracleobjectstorage/oracleobjectstorage.go:245`, `backend/internetarchive/internetarchive.go:1016`, `backend/smb/smb.go:885`, `backend/storj/fs.go:289`.\n  - `path.Join` collapses `..` on the standard (ASCII) form **before** encoding is applied (e.g. `FromStandardPath(path.Join(...))` at `backend/b2/b2.go:1641`), so `EncodeDot` never gets the chance to neutralize the `..`.\n  - `lib/bucket.Join` does **not** clean paths (keeps `..` as a literal key segment); `path.Join` does. `backend/s3`, `backend/azureblob`, `backend/googlecloudstorage` already use `bucket.Join` and are therefore not affected.\n\n- **Path based backends** - `path.Join(root, remote)` onto a real path:\n  - sftp: `remotePath = path.Join(f.absRoot, f.opt.Enc.FromStandardPath(remote))` (`backend/sftp/sftp.go:2497`). Default encoding is `encoder.Display` (== `Standard`), and `FromStandardPath` short-circuits to a pass-through in that mode, so `..` survives; `f.absRoot` is absolute, so `path.Join(\"/home/user/root\", \"../../../../etc/passwd\")` -\u003e `/etc/passwd`.\n  - webdav: `filePath` at `backend/webdav/webdav.go:426-432`.\n  - ftp: `path.Join(f.root, remote)` at ~14 sites (e.g. `backend/ftp/ftp.go:1247`).\n  - filelu, shade, sia: analogous joins.\n\n### Precondition that limits reachability\n\nFor any of these to fire, a **source** must hand rclone a `Remote()` containing raw `..`. That is only possible when:\n\n1. the source is a **flat-keyspace object store** (not a filesystem - a local/sftp/smb source cannot represent `../../x` as one directory entry), **and**\n2. the offending key was written with **native, non-rclone tooling** - rclone's own writer applies `EncodeDot` and rewrites a `..` segment to fullwidth `．．`, so you cannot create such a key *through rclone*.\n\nrclone's source-side listing does pass a natively-planted raw `..` key through unchanged (verified for b2: `remote := file.Name[len(prefix):]` after `ToStandardPath`, `backend/b2/b2.go:858,867`). The reports never establish this precondition; it is the same omission across every member of the class.\n\n### Example attack\n\n```bash\n# Step 1 - attacker, using NATIVE S3 tooling (NOT rclone) on a source the victim ingests from:\naws s3api put-object --bucket shared-drop --key '../../victim-backups/pwned.txt' --body evil.txt\n\n# Step 2 - victim's ordinary ingest:\nrclone copy s3-drop:shared-drop b2:victim-uploads/incoming\n# path.Join(\"victim-uploads/incoming\", \"../../victim-backups/pwned.txt\") = \"victim-backups/pwned.txt\"\n# -\u003e lands in the victim's victim-backups bucket instead of under incoming/\n```\n\nThe blast radius is the victim's **own** account (a bucket/share/path the configured credential already reaches) - integrity misdirection, not a cross-tenant or confidentiality breach. sftp/smb are the exception in *reach* (server filesystem / other share), still bounded by the login's own permissions.\n\n## Precedent\n\nThis is the same class as the already-fixed local backend advisory [https://github.com/rclone/rclone/security/advisories/GHSA-7p4m-qxvv-g567](GHSA-7p4m-qxvv-g567), which added `(*Fs).localPath` returning `errPathEscapes` for names resolving outside the root (`backend/local/local.go:819-826`). That fix was justified because the destination was the operator's own OS filesystem; the same reasoning extends (at lower severity) to sftp/smb.","status":"published","published":"2026-09-10T22:45:36Z","modified":"2026-09-19T09:25:54.228971375Z","cvss":[{"version":"3.1","score":5.3,"vector":"CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N","level":"medium"}],"cwes":["CWE-22"],"updated_at":"2026-11-02T15:46:35.406455Z"},{"id":"UBUNTU-CVE-2026-88046","description":"rclone is a command-line program to sync files and directories to and from different cloud storage providers. Prior to 1.75.1, rclone core does not reject parent-directory segments in source Object.Remote() values before fs/list, fs/walk, fs/sync, and fs/operations pass those values to destination backends. A flat-keyspace source object store populated with native non-rclone tooling can contain a raw .. key segment, and affected b2, swift, qingstor, oracleobjectstorage, internetarchive, smb, storj, sftp, webdav, ftp, filelu, shade, and sia destinations use path.Join(root, remote) before EncodeDot can neutralize the segment. A copy or upload can therefore escape the configured root into another bucket, share, or path reachable by the victim credential, with sftp and smb potentially reaching other filesystem or share locations under the same login authority. This issue is fixed in version 1.75.1.","status":"published","published":"2026-09-10T17:17:00Z","modified":"2026-10-17T13:01:15.110507854Z","cvss":[{"version":"3.1","score":5.3,"vector":"CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N","level":"medium"}],"updated_at":"2026-11-02T16:57:24.828975Z"},{"id":"BIT-rclone-2026-88046","title":"rclone: source object names can escape the configured root on upload","description":"rclone is a command-line program to sync files and directories to and from different cloud storage providers. Prior to 1.75.1, rclone core does not reject parent-directory segments in source Object.Remote() values before fs/list, fs/walk, fs/sync, and fs/operations pass those values to destination backends. A flat-keyspace source object store populated with native non-rclone tooling can contain a raw .. key segment, and affected b2, swift, qingstor, oracleobjectstorage, internetarchive, smb, storj, sftp, webdav, ftp, filelu, shade, and sia destinations use path.Join(root, remote) before EncodeDot can neutralize the segment. A copy or upload can therefore escape the configured root into another bucket, share, or path reachable by the victim credential, with sftp and smb potentially reaching other filesystem or share locations under the same login authority. This issue is fixed in version 1.75.1.","status":"published","published":"2026-09-19T08:49:54.492Z","modified":"2026-09-19T09:25:54.228971375Z","updated_at":"2026-11-02T15:28:35.111822Z"},{"id":"GO-2026-6457","title":"rclone: source object names can escape the configured root on upload in github.com/rclone/rclone","description":"rclone: source object names can escape the configured root on upload in github.com/rclone/rclone","status":"published","published":"2026-09-16T16:56:29Z","modified":"2026-09-19T09:25:54.228971375Z","updated_at":"2026-11-02T15:47:03.11707Z"},{"id":"openSUSE-SU-2026:21897-1","title":"Security update for govulncheck-vulndb","description":"This update for govulncheck-vulndb fixes the following issues:\n\nChanges for govulncheck-vulndb:\n\n- Update to version 0.0.20260916T180043 2026-09-16T18:00:43Z (jsc#PED-11136).\n\n Go CVE Numbering Authority IDs added or updated with aliases:\n * GO-2026-6348 CVE-2026-84304 GHSA-vp52-pcj8-j9qc\n * GO-2026-6356 CVE-2026-65959 GHSA-mhc4-g3wh-cw7m\n * GO-2026-6366 CVE-2026-61625 GHSA-8q3c-rjr9-xxrp\n * GO-2026-6372 CVE-2026-79921 GHSA-6c5v-hqjr-5xxp\n * GO-2026-6441 CVE-2026-84303 GHSA-qc2q-p7wx-3px3\n * GO-2026-6443 CVE-2026-84445 GHSA-2v4p-qf9q-27wj\n * GO-2026-6444 CVE-2026-53495 GHSA-7jxh-36q5-gcqv\n * GO-2026-6445 CVE-2025-58363 GHSA-c23q-fw86-9h5x\n * GO-2026-6446 CVE-2025-24978 GHSA-g8rh-fjm6-h2h9\n * GO-2026-6447 CVE-2025-24979 GHSA-pqqc-8v73-9gg2\n * GO-2026-6448 CVE-2026-59185 GHSA-cp3j-m783-3ph5\n * GO-2026-6449 GHSA-hxjg-93wc-h8p8\n * GO-2026-6450 CVE-2026-59172 GHSA-m835-3cm9-rggg\n * GO-2026-6451 CVE-2026-59157 GHSA-v25g-mvwr-f5fp\n * GO-2026-6452 CVE-2026-59162 GHSA-fx5j-qcqg-grpf\n * GO-2026-6453 CVE-2026-59161 GHSA-q5j5-6p94-4gwc\n * GO-2026-6454 CVE-2026-88012 GHSA-7ghq-v6jf-g56c\n * GO-2026-6455 CVE-2026-88011 GHSA-rf44-j88r-hh8c\n * GO-2026-6456 CVE-2026-88045 GHSA-2p48-j3qc-rx9f\n * GO-2026-6457 CVE-2026-88046 GHSA-38xv-hf3p-h7mq\n * GO-2026-6458 CVE-2026-88017 GHSA-c476-6w5q-jw77\n * GO-2026-6459 CVE-2026-88016 GHSA-f8g7-2xjc-7mfh\n * GO-2026-6460 CVE-2026-88044 GHSA-p569-5gjg-9cmj\n * GO-2026-6461 CVE-2026-88015 GHSA-p6m2-r3w9-mpxw\n * GO-2026-6462 CVE-2026-88018 GHSA-xwwr-4h3p-r22c\n * GO-2026-6463 CVE-2026-88013 GHSA-486v-q2wf-fp2r\n * GO-2026-6464 CVE-2026-88014 GHSA-66hp-wgxq-6f5q\n * GO-2026-6465 CVE-2026-88009 GHSA-f52w-8j3h-j724\n * GO-2026-6466 CVE-2026-88007 GHSA-qqjf-53cj-pwvv\n * GO-2026-6467 CVE-2026-88004 GHSA-v67p-phpq-fc8x\n * GO-2026-6468 CVE-2026-88008 GHSA-w4v4-9rw7-5326\n * GO-2026-6469 CVE-2026-56665 GHSA-v77h-2w3m-94hx\n * GO-2026-6470 CVE-2026-56666 GHSA-992q-9gwp-7r79\n * GO-2026-6473 CVE-2026-76081 GHSA-v859-c572-qh5p\n * GO-2026-6474 CVE-2026-56668 GHSA-vrh8-c9cm-wh8v\n- Update to version 0.0.20260910T144842 2026-09-10T14:48:42Z.\n * GO-2026-6302 GHSA-mf7q-r4rv-jv94\n * GO-2026-6343 CVE-2026-25782 GHSA-qm72-8prh-g92x\n * GO-2026-6344 CVE-2026-26292 GHSA-rc56-rj3f-xggf\n * GO-2026-6345 CVE-2026-27779 GHSA-v8f2-2ghq-9whv\n * GO-2026-6346 CVE-2026-27780 GHSA-vhq7-fwwh-7hjf\n * GO-2026-6347 CVE-2026-27660 GHSA-x92v-f5gc-r34v\n * GO-2026-6350 CVE-2026-59832 GHSA-275h-v5h9-vr82\n * GO-2026-6351 CVE-2026-72920 GHSA-2v6v-25fm-p4fg\n * GO-2026-6353 CVE-2026-59834 GHSA-h89q-4j2h-7h88\n * GO-2026-6357 CVE-2026-73667 GHSA-2mw5-23gm-pccq\n * GO-2026-6358 CVE-2026-73841 GHSA-52gf-6rpq-fgmx\n * GO-2026-6359 CVE-2026-67446 GHSA-75mr-qw9x-3r39\n * GO-2026-6360 CVE-2026-73840 GHSA-c5f6-2rm9-2w8g\n * GO-2026-6361 CVE-2026-72921 GHSA-gv5w-hfx8-8cwq\n * GO-2026-6362 CVE-2026-73843 GHSA-qh9r-j7rp-4x2m\n * GO-2026-6363 CVE-2026-67445 GHSA-w878-pj84-3j5v\n * GO-2026-6364 GHSA-99rq-75j6-5j9f\n * GO-2026-6365 GHSA-gw25-m53r-qh88\n * GO-2026-6367 CVE-2026-56743 GHSA-fm8w-2m5w-9j7r\n * GO-2026-6368 CVE-2026-75602 GHSA-h6cj-26g5-67fv\n * GO-2026-6369 CVE-2026-73232 GHSA-jcvh-xf52-2cwm\n * GO-2026-6370 CVE-2026-73292 GHSA-8cj9-r88m-8945\n * GO-2026-6371 CVE-2026-73293 GHSA-cxvf-gvfq-36w2\n * GO-2026-6373 CVE-2026-69086 GHSA-7hm9-v7vf-7g4w\n * GO-2026-6374 CVE-2026-69083 GHSA-fph3-ghq9-vw66\n * GO-2026-6377 CVE-2026-69084 GHSA-vh22-h7hf-www7\n * GO-2026-6379 CVE-2026-68586 GHSA-36v8-mpjm-8j5r\n * GO-2026-6381 CVE-2026-68587 GHSA-69mh-gvh4-8gp7\n * GO-2026-6382 CVE-2026-68584 GHSA-7j72-f6wg-cxw6\n * GO-2026-6384 CVE-2026-68585 GHSA-pm3w-vxp9-ccwc\n * GO-2026-6386 CVE-2026-72809 GHSA-3mp7-4rh5-jrv9\n * GO-2026-6387 CVE-2026-72805 GHSA-67x2-mq63-v9vm\n * GO-2026-6388 CVE-2026-72806 GHSA-6mcf-g667-w3qv\n * GO-2026-6392 CVE-2026-72801 GHSA-8x84-r2ff-h8pq\n * GO-2026-6395 CVE-2026-72800 GHSA-5fhr-f75j-8wr9\n * GO-2026-6398 CVE-2026-72802 GHSA-jv8v-xq2h-657v\n * GO-2026-6400 CVE-2026-72810 GHSA-mw8r-mw84-88v2\n * GO-2026-6402 CVE-2026-72811 GHSA-q2vg-7qgx-x5fc\n * GO-2026-6404 CVE-2026-72803 GHSA-qvq9-hq6p-v378\n * GO-2026-6406 CVE-2026-72808 GHSA-v7ph-r5r6-4jcj\n * GO-2026-6407 CVE-2026-72804 GHSA-vpjw-wf5h-cgpq\n * GO-2026-6408 CVE-2026-72812 GHSA-wgwx-479j-23vq\n * GO-2026-6410 CVE-2026-72807 GHSA-x67c-8pwr-m8g3\n * GO-2026-6411 CVE-2026-11720 GHSA-vwxw-jrg6-9jxv\n * GO-2026-6412 CVE-2026-72799 GHSA-5w7r-f4cg-rqq7\n * GO-2026-6414 CVE-2026-72797 GHSA-f2rw-w22v-54vh\n * GO-2026-6415 CVE-2026-72798 GHSA-mfrj-v65r-979c\n * GO-2026-6420 CVE-2026-72794 GHSA-34fj-mwm6-fjfg\n * GO-2026-6423 CVE-2026-72796 GHSA-fgmr-7w36-9qfq\n * GO-2026-6424 CVE-2026-72793 GHSA-h4v5-crx2-3cv4\n * GO-2026-6425 CVE-2026-72795 GHSA-h6w7-xxcf-w2mq\n * GO-2026-6427 CVE-2026-72792 GHSA-mp7r-57w4-5qm3\n * GO-2026-6428 CVE-2026-73842 GHSA-rh53-xvx2-j327\n * GO-2026-6430 GHSA-57v5-wqx3-cgj4\n * GO-2026-6431 CVE-2026-72790 GHSA-74pj-6g7r-j55c\n * GO-2026-6433 CVE-2026-60004 GHSA-rcr6-4jqh-j84m\n * GO-2026-6434 CVE-2026-72789 GHSA-v684-q882-jgmq\n * GO-2026-6435 CVE-2026-73294 GHSA-xp7j-h7jc-4w8p\n * GO-2026-6437 CVE-2026-71494 GHSA-6x6c-w9w9-hv4h\n * GO-2026-6439 CVE-2026-71493 GHSA-mmg6-4qmv-6pc8\n * GO-2026-6440 CVE-2026-73087 GHSA-p2w3-6x73-2f6x\n","status":"published","published":"2026-09-21T12:36:27Z","modified":"2026-09-25T18:23:11.534555779Z","updated_at":"2026-11-02T16:58:42.426393Z"},{"id":"SUSE-SU-2026:23855-1","title":"Security update for govulncheck-vulndb","description":"This update for govulncheck-vulndb fixes the following issues:\n\nChanges for govulncheck-vulndb:\n\n- Update to version 0.0.20260916T180043 2026-09-16T18:00:43Z (jsc#PED-11136).\n\n Go CVE Numbering Authority IDs added or updated with aliases:\n * GO-2026-6348 CVE-2026-84304 GHSA-vp52-pcj8-j9qc\n * GO-2026-6356 CVE-2026-65959 GHSA-mhc4-g3wh-cw7m\n * GO-2026-6366 CVE-2026-61625 GHSA-8q3c-rjr9-xxrp\n * GO-2026-6372 CVE-2026-79921 GHSA-6c5v-hqjr-5xxp\n * GO-2026-6441 CVE-2026-84303 GHSA-qc2q-p7wx-3px3\n * GO-2026-6443 CVE-2026-84445 GHSA-2v4p-qf9q-27wj\n * GO-2026-6444 CVE-2026-53495 GHSA-7jxh-36q5-gcqv\n * GO-2026-6445 CVE-2025-58363 GHSA-c23q-fw86-9h5x\n * GO-2026-6446 CVE-2025-24978 GHSA-g8rh-fjm6-h2h9\n * GO-2026-6447 CVE-2025-24979 GHSA-pqqc-8v73-9gg2\n * GO-2026-6448 CVE-2026-59185 GHSA-cp3j-m783-3ph5\n * GO-2026-6449 GHSA-hxjg-93wc-h8p8\n * GO-2026-6450 CVE-2026-59172 GHSA-m835-3cm9-rggg\n * GO-2026-6451 CVE-2026-59157 GHSA-v25g-mvwr-f5fp\n * GO-2026-6452 CVE-2026-59162 GHSA-fx5j-qcqg-grpf\n * GO-2026-6453 CVE-2026-59161 GHSA-q5j5-6p94-4gwc\n * GO-2026-6454 CVE-2026-88012 GHSA-7ghq-v6jf-g56c\n * GO-2026-6455 CVE-2026-88011 GHSA-rf44-j88r-hh8c\n * GO-2026-6456 CVE-2026-88045 GHSA-2p48-j3qc-rx9f\n * GO-2026-6457 CVE-2026-88046 GHSA-38xv-hf3p-h7mq\n * GO-2026-6458 CVE-2026-88017 GHSA-c476-6w5q-jw77\n * GO-2026-6459 CVE-2026-88016 GHSA-f8g7-2xjc-7mfh\n * GO-2026-6460 CVE-2026-88044 GHSA-p569-5gjg-9cmj\n * GO-2026-6461 CVE-2026-88015 GHSA-p6m2-r3w9-mpxw\n * GO-2026-6462 CVE-2026-88018 GHSA-xwwr-4h3p-r22c\n * GO-2026-6463 CVE-2026-88013 GHSA-486v-q2wf-fp2r\n * GO-2026-6464 CVE-2026-88014 GHSA-66hp-wgxq-6f5q\n * GO-2026-6465 CVE-2026-88009 GHSA-f52w-8j3h-j724\n * GO-2026-6466 CVE-2026-88007 GHSA-qqjf-53cj-pwvv\n * GO-2026-6467 CVE-2026-88004 GHSA-v67p-phpq-fc8x\n * GO-2026-6468 CVE-2026-88008 GHSA-w4v4-9rw7-5326\n * GO-2026-6469 CVE-2026-56665 GHSA-v77h-2w3m-94hx\n * GO-2026-6470 CVE-2026-56666 GHSA-992q-9gwp-7r79\n * GO-2026-6473 CVE-2026-76081 GHSA-v859-c572-qh5p\n * GO-2026-6474 CVE-2026-56668 GHSA-vrh8-c9cm-wh8v\n- Update to version 0.0.20260910T144842 2026-09-10T14:48:42Z.\n * GO-2026-6302 GHSA-mf7q-r4rv-jv94\n * GO-2026-6343 CVE-2026-25782 GHSA-qm72-8prh-g92x\n * GO-2026-6344 CVE-2026-26292 GHSA-rc56-rj3f-xggf\n * GO-2026-6345 CVE-2026-27779 GHSA-v8f2-2ghq-9whv\n * GO-2026-6346 CVE-2026-27780 GHSA-vhq7-fwwh-7hjf\n * GO-2026-6347 CVE-2026-27660 GHSA-x92v-f5gc-r34v\n * GO-2026-6350 CVE-2026-59832 GHSA-275h-v5h9-vr82\n * GO-2026-6351 CVE-2026-72920 GHSA-2v6v-25fm-p4fg\n * GO-2026-6353 CVE-2026-59834 GHSA-h89q-4j2h-7h88\n * GO-2026-6357 CVE-2026-73667 GHSA-2mw5-23gm-pccq\n * GO-2026-6358 CVE-2026-73841 GHSA-52gf-6rpq-fgmx\n * GO-2026-6359 CVE-2026-67446 GHSA-75mr-qw9x-3r39\n * GO-2026-6360 CVE-2026-73840 GHSA-c5f6-2rm9-2w8g\n * GO-2026-6361 CVE-2026-72921 GHSA-gv5w-hfx8-8cwq\n * GO-2026-6362 CVE-2026-73843 GHSA-qh9r-j7rp-4x2m\n * GO-2026-6363 CVE-2026-67445 GHSA-w878-pj84-3j5v\n * GO-2026-6364 GHSA-99rq-75j6-5j9f\n * GO-2026-6365 GHSA-gw25-m53r-qh88\n * GO-2026-6367 CVE-2026-56743 GHSA-fm8w-2m5w-9j7r\n * GO-2026-6368 CVE-2026-75602 GHSA-h6cj-26g5-67fv\n * GO-2026-6369 CVE-2026-73232 GHSA-jcvh-xf52-2cwm\n * GO-2026-6370 CVE-2026-73292 GHSA-8cj9-r88m-8945\n * GO-2026-6371 CVE-2026-73293 GHSA-cxvf-gvfq-36w2\n * GO-2026-6373 CVE-2026-69086 GHSA-7hm9-v7vf-7g4w\n * GO-2026-6374 CVE-2026-69083 GHSA-fph3-ghq9-vw66\n * GO-2026-6377 CVE-2026-69084 GHSA-vh22-h7hf-www7\n * GO-2026-6379 CVE-2026-68586 GHSA-36v8-mpjm-8j5r\n * GO-2026-6381 CVE-2026-68587 GHSA-69mh-gvh4-8gp7\n * GO-2026-6382 CVE-2026-68584 GHSA-7j72-f6wg-cxw6\n * GO-2026-6384 CVE-2026-68585 GHSA-pm3w-vxp9-ccwc\n * GO-2026-6386 CVE-2026-72809 GHSA-3mp7-4rh5-jrv9\n * GO-2026-6387 CVE-2026-72805 GHSA-67x2-mq63-v9vm\n * GO-2026-6388 CVE-2026-72806 GHSA-6mcf-g667-w3qv\n * GO-2026-6392 CVE-2026-72801 GHSA-8x84-r2ff-h8pq\n * GO-2026-6395 CVE-2026-72800 GHSA-5fhr-f75j-8wr9\n * GO-2026-6398 CVE-2026-72802 GHSA-jv8v-xq2h-657v\n * GO-2026-6400 CVE-2026-72810 GHSA-mw8r-mw84-88v2\n * GO-2026-6402 CVE-2026-72811 GHSA-q2vg-7qgx-x5fc\n * GO-2026-6404 CVE-2026-72803 GHSA-qvq9-hq6p-v378\n * GO-2026-6406 CVE-2026-72808 GHSA-v7ph-r5r6-4jcj\n * GO-2026-6407 CVE-2026-72804 GHSA-vpjw-wf5h-cgpq\n * GO-2026-6408 CVE-2026-72812 GHSA-wgwx-479j-23vq\n * GO-2026-6410 CVE-2026-72807 GHSA-x67c-8pwr-m8g3\n * GO-2026-6411 CVE-2026-11720 GHSA-vwxw-jrg6-9jxv\n * GO-2026-6412 CVE-2026-72799 GHSA-5w7r-f4cg-rqq7\n * GO-2026-6414 CVE-2026-72797 GHSA-f2rw-w22v-54vh\n * GO-2026-6415 CVE-2026-72798 GHSA-mfrj-v65r-979c\n * GO-2026-6420 CVE-2026-72794 GHSA-34fj-mwm6-fjfg\n * GO-2026-6423 CVE-2026-72796 GHSA-fgmr-7w36-9qfq\n * GO-2026-6424 CVE-2026-72793 GHSA-h4v5-crx2-3cv4\n * GO-2026-6425 CVE-2026-72795 GHSA-h6w7-xxcf-w2mq\n * GO-2026-6427 CVE-2026-72792 GHSA-mp7r-57w4-5qm3\n * GO-2026-6428 CVE-2026-73842 GHSA-rh53-xvx2-j327\n * GO-2026-6430 GHSA-57v5-wqx3-cgj4\n * GO-2026-6431 CVE-2026-72790 GHSA-74pj-6g7r-j55c\n * GO-2026-6433 CVE-2026-60004 GHSA-rcr6-4jqh-j84m\n * GO-2026-6434 CVE-2026-72789 GHSA-v684-q882-jgmq\n * GO-2026-6435 CVE-2026-73294 GHSA-xp7j-h7jc-4w8p\n * GO-2026-6437 CVE-2026-71494 GHSA-6x6c-w9w9-hv4h\n * GO-2026-6439 CVE-2026-71493 GHSA-mmg6-4qmv-6pc8\n * GO-2026-6440 CVE-2026-73087 GHSA-p2w3-6x73-2f6x\n","status":"published","published":"2026-09-21T12:24:57Z","modified":"2026-09-27T18:23:15.791415126Z","updated_at":"2026-11-02T15:54:03.991985Z"},{"id":"SUSE-SU-2026:23863-1","title":"Security update for govulncheck-vulndb","description":"This update for govulncheck-vulndb fixes the following issues:\n\nChanges for govulncheck-vulndb:\n\n- Update to version 0.0.20260916T180043 2026-09-16T18:00:43Z (jsc#PED-11136).\n\n Go CVE Numbering Authority IDs added or updated with aliases:\n * GO-2026-6348 CVE-2026-84304 GHSA-vp52-pcj8-j9qc\n * GO-2026-6356 CVE-2026-65959 GHSA-mhc4-g3wh-cw7m\n * GO-2026-6366 CVE-2026-61625 GHSA-8q3c-rjr9-xxrp\n * GO-2026-6372 CVE-2026-79921 GHSA-6c5v-hqjr-5xxp\n * GO-2026-6441 CVE-2026-84303 GHSA-qc2q-p7wx-3px3\n * GO-2026-6443 CVE-2026-84445 GHSA-2v4p-qf9q-27wj\n * GO-2026-6444 CVE-2026-53495 GHSA-7jxh-36q5-gcqv\n * GO-2026-6445 CVE-2025-58363 GHSA-c23q-fw86-9h5x\n * GO-2026-6446 CVE-2025-24978 GHSA-g8rh-fjm6-h2h9\n * GO-2026-6447 CVE-2025-24979 GHSA-pqqc-8v73-9gg2\n * GO-2026-6448 CVE-2026-59185 GHSA-cp3j-m783-3ph5\n * GO-2026-6449 GHSA-hxjg-93wc-h8p8\n * GO-2026-6450 CVE-2026-59172 GHSA-m835-3cm9-rggg\n * GO-2026-6451 CVE-2026-59157 GHSA-v25g-mvwr-f5fp\n * GO-2026-6452 CVE-2026-59162 GHSA-fx5j-qcqg-grpf\n * GO-2026-6453 CVE-2026-59161 GHSA-q5j5-6p94-4gwc\n * GO-2026-6454 CVE-2026-88012 GHSA-7ghq-v6jf-g56c\n * GO-2026-6455 CVE-2026-88011 GHSA-rf44-j88r-hh8c\n * GO-2026-6456 CVE-2026-88045 GHSA-2p48-j3qc-rx9f\n * GO-2026-6457 CVE-2026-88046 GHSA-38xv-hf3p-h7mq\n * GO-2026-6458 CVE-2026-88017 GHSA-c476-6w5q-jw77\n * GO-2026-6459 CVE-2026-88016 GHSA-f8g7-2xjc-7mfh\n * GO-2026-6460 CVE-2026-88044 GHSA-p569-5gjg-9cmj\n * GO-2026-6461 CVE-2026-88015 GHSA-p6m2-r3w9-mpxw\n * GO-2026-6462 CVE-2026-88018 GHSA-xwwr-4h3p-r22c\n * GO-2026-6463 CVE-2026-88013 GHSA-486v-q2wf-fp2r\n * GO-2026-6464 CVE-2026-88014 GHSA-66hp-wgxq-6f5q\n * GO-2026-6465 CVE-2026-88009 GHSA-f52w-8j3h-j724\n * GO-2026-6466 CVE-2026-88007 GHSA-qqjf-53cj-pwvv\n * GO-2026-6467 CVE-2026-88004 GHSA-v67p-phpq-fc8x\n * GO-2026-6468 CVE-2026-88008 GHSA-w4v4-9rw7-5326\n * GO-2026-6469 CVE-2026-56665 GHSA-v77h-2w3m-94hx\n * GO-2026-6470 CVE-2026-56666 GHSA-992q-9gwp-7r79\n * GO-2026-6473 CVE-2026-76081 GHSA-v859-c572-qh5p\n * GO-2026-6474 CVE-2026-56668 GHSA-vrh8-c9cm-wh8v\n- Update to version 0.0.20260910T144842 2026-09-10T14:48:42Z.\n * GO-2026-6302 GHSA-mf7q-r4rv-jv94\n * GO-2026-6343 CVE-2026-25782 GHSA-qm72-8prh-g92x\n * GO-2026-6344 CVE-2026-26292 GHSA-rc56-rj3f-xggf\n * GO-2026-6345 CVE-2026-27779 GHSA-v8f2-2ghq-9whv\n * GO-2026-6346 CVE-2026-27780 GHSA-vhq7-fwwh-7hjf\n * GO-2026-6347 CVE-2026-27660 GHSA-x92v-f5gc-r34v\n * GO-2026-6350 CVE-2026-59832 GHSA-275h-v5h9-vr82\n * GO-2026-6351 CVE-2026-72920 GHSA-2v6v-25fm-p4fg\n * GO-2026-6353 CVE-2026-59834 GHSA-h89q-4j2h-7h88\n * GO-2026-6357 CVE-2026-73667 GHSA-2mw5-23gm-pccq\n * GO-2026-6358 CVE-2026-73841 GHSA-52gf-6rpq-fgmx\n * GO-2026-6359 CVE-2026-67446 GHSA-75mr-qw9x-3r39\n * GO-2026-6360 CVE-2026-73840 GHSA-c5f6-2rm9-2w8g\n * GO-2026-6361 CVE-2026-72921 GHSA-gv5w-hfx8-8cwq\n * GO-2026-6362 CVE-2026-73843 GHSA-qh9r-j7rp-4x2m\n * GO-2026-6363 CVE-2026-67445 GHSA-w878-pj84-3j5v\n * GO-2026-6364 GHSA-99rq-75j6-5j9f\n * GO-2026-6365 GHSA-gw25-m53r-qh88\n * GO-2026-6367 CVE-2026-56743 GHSA-fm8w-2m5w-9j7r\n * GO-2026-6368 CVE-2026-75602 GHSA-h6cj-26g5-67fv\n * GO-2026-6369 CVE-2026-73232 GHSA-jcvh-xf52-2cwm\n * GO-2026-6370 CVE-2026-73292 GHSA-8cj9-r88m-8945\n * GO-2026-6371 CVE-2026-73293 GHSA-cxvf-gvfq-36w2\n * GO-2026-6373 CVE-2026-69086 GHSA-7hm9-v7vf-7g4w\n * GO-2026-6374 CVE-2026-69083 GHSA-fph3-ghq9-vw66\n * GO-2026-6377 CVE-2026-69084 GHSA-vh22-h7hf-www7\n * GO-2026-6379 CVE-2026-68586 GHSA-36v8-mpjm-8j5r\n * GO-2026-6381 CVE-2026-68587 GHSA-69mh-gvh4-8gp7\n * GO-2026-6382 CVE-2026-68584 GHSA-7j72-f6wg-cxw6\n * GO-2026-6384 CVE-2026-68585 GHSA-pm3w-vxp9-ccwc\n * GO-2026-6386 CVE-2026-72809 GHSA-3mp7-4rh5-jrv9\n * GO-2026-6387 CVE-2026-72805 GHSA-67x2-mq63-v9vm\n * GO-2026-6388 CVE-2026-72806 GHSA-6mcf-g667-w3qv\n * GO-2026-6392 CVE-2026-72801 GHSA-8x84-r2ff-h8pq\n * GO-2026-6395 CVE-2026-72800 GHSA-5fhr-f75j-8wr9\n * GO-2026-6398 CVE-2026-72802 GHSA-jv8v-xq2h-657v\n * GO-2026-6400 CVE-2026-72810 GHSA-mw8r-mw84-88v2\n * GO-2026-6402 CVE-2026-72811 GHSA-q2vg-7qgx-x5fc\n * GO-2026-6404 CVE-2026-72803 GHSA-qvq9-hq6p-v378\n * GO-2026-6406 CVE-2026-72808 GHSA-v7ph-r5r6-4jcj\n * GO-2026-6407 CVE-2026-72804 GHSA-vpjw-wf5h-cgpq\n * GO-2026-6408 CVE-2026-72812 GHSA-wgwx-479j-23vq\n * GO-2026-6410 CVE-2026-72807 GHSA-x67c-8pwr-m8g3\n * GO-2026-6411 CVE-2026-11720 GHSA-vwxw-jrg6-9jxv\n * GO-2026-6412 CVE-2026-72799 GHSA-5w7r-f4cg-rqq7\n * GO-2026-6414 CVE-2026-72797 GHSA-f2rw-w22v-54vh\n * GO-2026-6415 CVE-2026-72798 GHSA-mfrj-v65r-979c\n * GO-2026-6420 CVE-2026-72794 GHSA-34fj-mwm6-fjfg\n * GO-2026-6423 CVE-2026-72796 GHSA-fgmr-7w36-9qfq\n * GO-2026-6424 CVE-2026-72793 GHSA-h4v5-crx2-3cv4\n * GO-2026-6425 CVE-2026-72795 GHSA-h6w7-xxcf-w2mq\n * GO-2026-6427 CVE-2026-72792 GHSA-mp7r-57w4-5qm3\n * GO-2026-6428 CVE-2026-73842 GHSA-rh53-xvx2-j327\n * GO-2026-6430 GHSA-57v5-wqx3-cgj4\n * GO-2026-6431 CVE-2026-72790 GHSA-74pj-6g7r-j55c\n * GO-2026-6433 CVE-2026-60004 GHSA-rcr6-4jqh-j84m\n * GO-2026-6434 CVE-2026-72789 GHSA-v684-q882-jgmq\n * GO-2026-6435 CVE-2026-73294 GHSA-xp7j-h7jc-4w8p\n * GO-2026-6437 CVE-2026-71494 GHSA-6x6c-w9w9-hv4h\n * GO-2026-6439 CVE-2026-71493 GHSA-mmg6-4qmv-6pc8\n * GO-2026-6440 CVE-2026-73087 GHSA-p2w3-6x73-2f6x\n","status":"published","published":"2026-09-21T12:24:57Z","modified":"2026-09-27T18:23:16.587575494Z","updated_at":"2026-11-02T15:54:03.991985Z"}]}}