CVE-2012-0390
The DTLS implementation in GnuTLS 3.0.10 and earlier executes certain error-handling code only if...
The DTLS implementation in GnuTLS 3.0.10 and earlier executes certain error-handling code only if there is a specific relationship between a padding length and the ciphertext size, which makes it easier for remote attackers to recover partial plaintext via a timing side-channel attack, a related issue to CVE-2011-4108.
Exploit likelihood
What each source reports
NVD Score used
4.3
The DTLS implementation in GnuTLS 3.0.10 and earlier executes certain error-handling code only if there is a specific relationship between a padding length and the ciphertext size, which makes it easier for remote attackers to recover partial plaintext via a timing side-channel attack, a related issue to CVE-2011-4108.
- Record
CVE-2012-0390- CVSS 2.0
- 4.3 Medium
AV:N/AC:M/Au:N/C:P/I:N/A:N - Weakness
- CWE-310
- Updated
- 2026-11-02
CVE List No score
The DTLS implementation in GnuTLS 3.0.10 and earlier executes certain error-handling code only if there is a specific relationship between a padding length and the ciphertext size, which makes it easier for remote attackers to recover partial plaintext via a timing side-channel attack, a related issue to CVE-2011-4108.
- Record
CVE-2012-0390- Updated
- 2026-11-02
EUVDEUVD-2012-0426 No score
The DTLS implementation in GnuTLS 3.0.10 and earlier executes certain error-handling code only if there is a specific relationship between a padding length and the ciphertext size, which makes it easier for remote attackers to recover partial plaintext via a timing side-channel attack, a related issue to CVE-2011-4108.
- Record
EUVD-2012-0426- Updated
- 2026-11-03
GitHub AdvisoriesGHSA-8w6j-wjpg-446m No score
The DTLS implementation in GnuTLS 3.0.10 and earlier executes certain error-handling code only if...
The DTLS implementation in GnuTLS 3.0.10 and earlier executes certain error-handling code only if there is a specific relationship between a padding length and the ciphertext size, which makes it easier for remote attackers to recover partial plaintext via a timing side-channel attack, a related issue to CVE-2011-4108.
- Record
GHSA-8w6j-wjpg-446m- Updated
- 2026-11-02
OSV No score
The DTLS implementation in GnuTLS 3.0.10 and earlier executes certain error-handling code only if there is a specific relationship between a padding length and the ciphertext size, which makes it easier for remote attackers to recover partial plaintext via a timing side-channel attack, a related issue to CVE-2011-4108.
- Record
CVE-2012-0390- Updated
- 2026-11-02
OSVDEBIAN-CVE-2012-0390 No score
The DTLS implementation in GnuTLS 3.0.10 and earlier executes certain error-handling code only if there is a specific relationship between a padding length and the ciphertext size, which makes it easier for remote attackers to recover partial plaintext via a timing side-channel attack, a related issue to CVE-2011-4108.
- Record
DEBIAN-CVE-2012-0390- Updated
- 2026-11-02
OSVopenSUSE-SU-2024:10105-1 No score
gnutls-3.4.15-1.1 on GA media
These are all security issues fixed in the gnutls-3.4.15-1.1 package on the GA media of openSUSE Tumbleweed.
- Record
openSUSE-SU-2024:10105-1- Updated
- 2026-11-02
Affected products
Affected packages
History
| Recorded | Changed | Sources |
|---|---|---|
| affected, facts | ||
| aliases | EUVD | |
| first indexed | CVE List, GitHub Advisories, NVD, OSV |
Dates are when Every CVE recorded each change. Upstream dates may differ.
In short
CVE-2012-0390 is a medium vulnerability (CVSS 4.3) in Gnu Gnutls, published January 6, 2012. No source lists public exploit code. EPSS puts the chance of exploitation in the next 30 days at 1.13%, the 66th percentile. Fixed in gnutls28 3.0.11-1.
References
secunia.com/advisories/57260
isg.rhul.ac.uk/~kp/dtls.pdf
lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2014-03/msg00001.html
nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2012-0390
github.com/advisories/GHSA-8w6j-wjpg-446m
security-tracker.debian.org/tracker/CVE-2012-0390
Show 10 moreShow less
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2008-4989
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2011-4128
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2012-0390
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2012-1569
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2012-1573
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2014-0092
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2014-1959
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2014-3466
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2014-8564
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2015-6251