CVE-2014-3527
Authorization Bypass in Spring Security
When using the CAS Proxy ticket authentication from Spring Security 3.1 to 3.2.4 a malicious CAS Service could trick another CAS Service into authenticating a proxy ticket that was not associated. This is due to the fact that the proxy ticket authentication uses the information from the HttpServletRequest which is populated based upon untrusted information within the HTTP request. This means if there are access control restrictions on which CAS services can authenticate to one another, those restrictions can be bypassed. If users are not using CAS Proxy tickets and not basing access control decisions based upon the CAS Service, then there is no impact to users.
Attack profile
How easy it is to exploit
- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges needed
- None
- User interaction
- None
What an attacker can affect
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
Exploit likelihood
What each source reports
NVD Score used
9.8
When using the CAS Proxy ticket authentication from Spring Security 3.1 to 3.2.4 a malicious CAS Service could trick another CAS Service into authenticating a proxy ticket that was not associated. This is due to the fact that the proxy ticket authentication uses the information from the HttpServletRequest which is populated based upon untrusted information within the HTTP request. This means if there are access control restrictions on which CAS services can authenticate to one another, those restrictions can be bypassed. If users are not using CAS Proxy tickets and not basing access control decisions based upon the CAS Service, then there is no impact to users.
- Record
CVE-2014-3527- CVSS 3.0
- 9.8 Critical
CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H - CVSS 2.0
- 7.5 High
AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:P/I:P/A:P - Weakness
- CWE-287
- Updated
- 2026-11-02
CVE List No score
When using the CAS Proxy ticket authentication from Spring Security 3.1 to 3.2.4 a malicious CAS Service could trick another CAS Service into authenticating a proxy ticket that was not associated. This is due to the fact that the proxy ticket authentication uses the information from the HttpServletRequest which is populated based upon untrusted information within the HTTP request. This means if there are access control restrictions on which CAS services can authenticate to one another, those restrictions can be bypassed. If users are not using CAS Proxy tickets and not basing access control decisions based upon the CAS Service, then there is no impact to users.
- Record
CVE-2014-3527- Updated
- 2026-11-02
EUVDEUVD-2020-1357 No score
When using the CAS Proxy ticket authentication from Spring Security 3.1 to 3.2.4 a malicious CAS Service could trick another CAS Service into authenticating a proxy ticket that was not associated. This is due to the fact that the proxy ticket authentication uses the information from the HttpServletRequest which is populated based upon untrusted information within the HTTP request. This means if there are access control restrictions on which CAS services can authenticate to one another, those restrictions can be bypassed. If users are not using CAS Proxy tickets and not basing access control decisions based upon the CAS Service, then there is no impact to users.
- Record
EUVD-2020-1357- Updated
- 2026-11-03
GitHub AdvisoriesGHSA-wmv4-5w76-vp9g
9.8
Authorization Bypass in Spring Security
When using Spring Security's CAS Proxy ticket authentication a malicious CAS Service could trick another CAS Service into authenticating a proxy ticket that was not associated. This is due to the fact that the proxy ticket authentication uses the information from the HttpServletRequest which is populated based upon untrusted information within the HTTP request.
This means if there are access control restrictions on which CAS services can authenticate to one another, those restrictions can be bypassed.
If users are not using CAS Proxy tickets and not basing access control decisions based upon the CAS Service, then there is no impact to users.
Mitigation
Users of affected versions should apply the following mitigation:
- Users of 3.2x should upgrade to 3.2.5 or later
- Users of 3.1.x should upgrade to 3.1.7 or later
Credit
This issue was identified by David Ohsie and brought to our attention by the CAS Development team.
- Record
GHSA-wmv4-5w76-vp9g- CVSS 3.0
- 9.8 Critical
CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H - Weakness
- CWE-287
- Updated
- 2026-11-02
OSVGHSA-wmv4-5w76-vp9g
9.8
Authorization Bypass in Spring Security
When using Spring Security's CAS Proxy ticket authentication a malicious CAS Service could trick another CAS Service into authenticating a proxy ticket that was not associated. This is due to the fact that the proxy ticket authentication uses the information from the HttpServletRequest which is populated based upon untrusted information within the HTTP request.
This means if there are access control restrictions on which CAS services can authenticate to one another, those restrictions can be bypassed.
If users are not using CAS Proxy tickets and not basing access control decisions based upon the CAS Service, then there is no impact to users.
Mitigation
Users of affected versions should apply the following mitigation:
- Users of 3.2x should upgrade to 3.2.5 or later
- Users of 3.1.x should upgrade to 3.1.7 or later
Credit
This issue was identified by David Ohsie and brought to our attention by the CAS Development team.
- Record
GHSA-wmv4-5w76-vp9g- CVSS 3.0
- 9.8 Critical
CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H - Weakness
- CWE-287
- Updated
- 2026-11-02
Affected products
Affected packages
| Package | Affected | Fixed |
|---|---|---|
org.springframework.security:spring-security-coreMaven |
before 3.1.7 | 3.1.7 |
org.springframework.security:spring-security-coreMaven |
3.2.0 up to 3.2.5 | 3.2.5 |
org.springframework.security:spring-security-coreMaven |
before 3.1.7, plus listed versions 2.0.02.0.12.0.22.0.32.0.4 Show 20 moreShow less2.0.5.RELEASE2.0.6.RELEASE2.0.7.RELEASE2.0.8.RELEASE3.0.0.RELEASE3.0.1.RELEASE3.0.2.RELEASE3.0.3.RELEASE3.0.4.RELEASE3.0.5.RELEASE3.0.6.RELEASE3.0.7.RELEASE3.0.8.RELEASE3.1.0.RELEASE3.1.1.RELEASE3.1.2.RELEASE3.1.3.RELEASE3.1.4.RELEASE3.1.5.RELEASE3.1.6.RELEASE |
3.1.7 |
org.springframework.security:spring-security-coreMaven |
3.2.0 up to 3.2.5, plus listed versions 3.2.0.RELEASE3.2.1.RELEASE3.2.2.RELEASE3.2.3.RELEASE3.2.4.RELEASE |
3.2.5 |
History
| Recorded | Changed | Sources |
|---|---|---|
| aliases, products | EUVD | |
| first indexed | CVE List, GitHub Advisories, NVD, OSV |
Dates are when Every CVE recorded each change. Upstream dates may differ.
In short
CVE-2014-3527 is a critical vulnerability (CVSS 9.8) in Pivotal Spring Security, published May 25, 2017. No source lists public exploit code. EPSS puts the chance of exploitation in the next 30 days at 1.82%, the 78th percentile. Fixed in org.springframework.security:spring-security-core 3.1.7.