CVE-2016-0701
The DH_check_pub_key function in crypto/dh/dh_check.c in OpenSSL 1.0.2 before 1.0.2f does not...
The DH_check_pub_key function in crypto/dh/dh_check.c in OpenSSL 1.0.2 before 1.0.2f does not ensure that prime numbers are appropriate for Diffie-Hellman (DH) key exchange, which makes it easier for remote attackers to discover a private DH exponent by making multiple handshakes with a peer that chose an inappropriate number, as demonstrated by a number in an X9.42 file.
Attack profile
How easy it is to exploit
- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- High
- Privileges needed
- None
- User interaction
- None
What an attacker can affect
- Confidentiality
- Low
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- None
Exploit likelihood
What each source reports
NVD Score used
3.7
The DH_check_pub_key function in crypto/dh/dh_check.c in OpenSSL 1.0.2 before 1.0.2f does not ensure that prime numbers are appropriate for Diffie-Hellman (DH) key exchange, which makes it easier for remote attackers to discover a private DH exponent by making multiple handshakes with a peer that chose an inappropriate number, as demonstrated by a number in an X9.42 file.
- Record
CVE-2016-0701- CVSS 3.0
- 3.7 Low
CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N - CVSS 2.0
- 2.6 Low
AV:N/AC:H/Au:N/C:P/I:N/A:N - Weakness
- CWE-200
- Updated
- 2026-11-02
CVE List No score
The DH_check_pub_key function in crypto/dh/dh_check.c in OpenSSL 1.0.2 before 1.0.2f does not ensure that prime numbers are appropriate for Diffie-Hellman (DH) key exchange, which makes it easier for remote attackers to discover a private DH exponent by making multiple handshakes with a peer that chose an inappropriate number, as demonstrated by a number in an X9.42 file.
- Record
CVE-2016-0701- Updated
- 2026-11-02
EUVDEUVD-2016-0736 No score
The DH_check_pub_key function in crypto/dh/dh_check.c in OpenSSL 1.0.2 before 1.0.2f does not ensure that prime numbers are appropriate for Diffie-Hellman (DH) key exchange, which makes it easier for remote attackers to discover a private DH exponent by making multiple handshakes with a peer that chose an inappropriate number, as demonstrated by a number in an X9.42 file.
- Record
EUVD-2016-0736- Updated
- 2026-11-03
GitHub AdvisoriesGHSA-v9p6-6jhc-fhfp
3.7
The DH_check_pub_key function in crypto/dh/dh_check.c in OpenSSL 1.0.2 before 1.0.2f does not...
The DH_check_pub_key function in crypto/dh/dh_check.c in OpenSSL 1.0.2 before 1.0.2f does not ensure that prime numbers are appropriate for Diffie-Hellman (DH) key exchange, which makes it easier for remote attackers to discover a private DH exponent by making multiple handshakes with a peer that chose an inappropriate number, as demonstrated by a number in an X9.42 file.
- Record
GHSA-v9p6-6jhc-fhfp- CVSS 3.0
- 3.7 Low
CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N - Weakness
- CWE-200
- Updated
- 2026-11-02
OSV
3.7
The DH_check_pub_key function in crypto/dh/dh_check.c in OpenSSL 1.0.2 before 1.0.2f does not ensure that prime numbers are appropriate for Diffie-Hellman (DH) key exchange, which makes it easier for remote attackers to discover a private DH exponent by making multiple handshakes with a peer that chose an inappropriate number, as demonstrated by a number in an X9.42 file.
- Record
CVE-2016-0701- CVSS 3.0
- 3.7 Low
CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N - Updated
- 2026-11-02
OSVDEBIAN-CVE-2016-0701
3.7
The DH_check_pub_key function in crypto/dh/dh_check.c in OpenSSL 1.0.2 before 1.0.2f does not ensure that prime numbers are appropriate for Diffie-Hellman (DH) key exchange, which makes it easier for remote attackers to discover a private DH exponent by making multiple handshakes with a peer that chose an inappropriate number, as demonstrated by a number in an X9.42 file.
- Record
DEBIAN-CVE-2016-0701- CVSS 3.0
- 3.7 Low
CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N - Updated
- 2026-11-02
Show 4 moreShow less
OSVMGASA-2016-0056 No score
Updated openssl packages fix security vulnerabilities
Updated openssl packages fix security vulnerability:
OpenSSL before 1.0.2f would allow for a process to re-use the same private Diffie-Hellman exponent repeatedly during its entire lifetime, which, given that it also allows to use custom DH parameters which may be based on unsafe primes, could enable an attack that could discover the DH exponent, compromising the security of DH symmetric key negotiation (CVE-2016-0701).
In OpenSSL before 1.0.2f, A malicious client can negotiate SSLv2 ciphers that have been disabled on the server and complete SSLv2 handshakes even if all SSLv2 ciphers have been disabled, provided that the SSLv2 protocol was not also disabled via SSL_OP_NO_SSLv2 (CVE-2015-3197).
- Record
MGASA-2016-0056- Updated
- 2026-11-02
OSVopenSUSE-SU-2024:10271-1 No score
libopenssl-devel-1.0.2j-2.2 on GA media
These are all security issues fixed in the libopenssl-devel-1.0.2j-2.2 package on the GA media of openSUSE Tumbleweed.
- Record
openSUSE-SU-2024:10271-1- Updated
- 2026-11-02
OSVopenSUSE-SU-2024:10529-1 No score
libopenssl1_0_0-steam-1.0.2h-4.1 on GA media
These are all security issues fixed in the libopenssl1_0_0-steam-1.0.2h-4.1 package on the GA media of openSUSE Tumbleweed.
- Record
openSUSE-SU-2024:10529-1- Updated
- 2026-11-02
OSVopenSUSE-SU-2024:11127-1 No score
libopenssl-1_1-devel-1.1.1l-1.2 on GA media
These are all security issues fixed in the libopenssl-1_1-devel-1.1.1l-1.2 package on the GA media of openSUSE Tumbleweed.
- Record
openSUSE-SU-2024:11127-1- Updated
- 2026-11-02
Affected products
Affected packages
| Package | Affected | Fixed |
|---|---|---|
opensslDebian:12 |
before 1.0.2f-2 | 1.0.2f-2 |
opensslDebian:13 |
before 1.0.2f-2 | 1.0.2f-2 |
opensslDebian:14 |
before 1.0.2f-2 | 1.0.2f-2 |
opensslMageia:5 From an advisory covering 2 CVEs |
before 1.0.2f-1.mga5 | 1.0.2f-1.mga5 |
openssl-1_1openSUSE:Tumbleweed From an advisory covering 136 CVEs |
before 1.1.1l-1.2 | 1.1.1l-1.2 |
History
| Recorded | Changed | Sources |
|---|---|---|
| affected, facts | ||
| aliases | EUVD | |
| first indexed | CVE List, GitHub Advisories, NVD, OSV |
Dates are when Every CVE recorded each change. Upstream dates may differ.
In short
CVE-2016-0701 is a low vulnerability (CVSS 3.7) in Openssl, published February 9, 2016. No source lists public exploit code. EPSS puts the chance of exploitation in the next 30 days at 83.6%, the 99th percentile. Fixed in openssl 1.0.2f-2.
References
lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/package-announce/2016-January/176373.html
securitytracker.com/id/1034849
security.gentoo.org/glsa/201601-05
securityfocus.com/bid/82233
securityfocus.com/bid/91787
kb.cert.org/vuls/id/257823
Show 162 moreShow less
lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2016-03/msg00009.html
ubuntu.com/usn/USN-2883-1
oracle.com/security-alerts/cpuapr2020.html
oracle.com/security-alerts/cpujul2020.html
oracle.com/technetwork/security-advisory/cpujul2019-5072835.html
oracle.com/security-alerts/cpujan2020.html
oracle.com/technetwork/security-advisory/cpujul2016-2881720.html
git.openssl.org?p=openssl.git%3Ba=commit%3Bh=c5b831f21d0d29d1e517d139d9d101763f60c9a2
git.openssl.org?p=openssl.git%3Ba=commit%3Bh=878e2c5b13010329c203f309ed0c8f2113f85648
h20566.www2.hpe.com/portal/site/hpsc/public/kb/docDisplay?docId=emr_na-c05164821
openssl.org/news/secadv/20160128.txt
oracle.com/technetwork/security-advisory/cpuoct2017-3236626.html
h20566.www2.hpe.com/portal/site/hpsc/public/kb/docDisplay?docId=emr_na-c05390893
intothesymmetry.blogspot.com/2016/01/openssl-key-recovery-attack-on-dh-small.html
h20566.www2.hpe.com/hpsc/doc/public/display?docLocale=en_US&docId=emr_na-hpesbhf03724en_us
kb.juniper.net/InfoCenter/index?page=content&id=JSA10759
oracle.com/security-alerts/cpuoct2020.html
cert-portal.siemens.com/productcert/pdf/ssa-412672.pdf
nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2016-0701
git.openssl.org?p=openssl.git;a=commit;h=878e2c5b13010329c203f309ed0c8f2113f85648
git.openssl.org?p=openssl.git;a=commit;h=c5b831f21d0d29d1e517d139d9d101763f60c9a2
github.com/advisories/GHSA-v9p6-6jhc-fhfp
security-tracker.debian.org/tracker/CVE-2016-0701
advisories.mageia.org/MGASA-2016-0056.html
bugs.mageia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=17640
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2006-7250
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2008-5077
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2009-0590
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2009-0591
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2009-0789
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2009-1377
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2009-1378
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2009-1379
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2009-1386
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2009-1387
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2010-0740
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2010-0742
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2010-1633
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2010-2939
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2010-3864
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2010-5298
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2011-0014
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2011-3207
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2011-3210
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2011-4108
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2011-4576
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2011-4577
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2011-4619
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2012-0027
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2012-0050
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2012-0884
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2012-1165
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2012-2110
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2012-2686
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2012-4929
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2013-0166
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2013-0169
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2013-4353
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2013-6449
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2013-6450
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2014-0076
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2014-0160
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2014-0195
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2014-0198
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2014-0221
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2014-0224
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2014-3470
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2014-3505
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2014-3506
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2014-3507
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2014-3508
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2014-3509
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2014-3510
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2014-3511
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2014-3512
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2014-3513
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2014-3567
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2014-3568
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2014-3569
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2014-3570
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2014-3571
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2014-3572
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2014-5139
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2014-8275
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2015-0204
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2015-0205
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2015-0206
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2015-0209
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2015-0286
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2015-0287
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2015-0288
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2015-0289
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2015-0293
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2015-1788
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2015-1789
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2015-1790
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2015-1791
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2015-1792
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2015-1793
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2015-1794
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2015-3193
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2015-3194
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2015-3195
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2015-3196
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2015-3197
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2016-0701
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2016-0702
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2016-0705
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2016-0797
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2016-0798
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2016-0800
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2016-2105
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2016-2106
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2016-2107
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2016-2109
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2016-2176
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2016-2177
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2016-2178
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2016-2179
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2016-2180
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2016-2181
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2016-2182
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2016-2183
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2016-6302
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2016-6303
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2016-6304
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2016-6306
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2016-7052
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2006-2937
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2006-2940
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2006-3738
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2006-4339
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2006-4343
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2007-3108
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2007-5135
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2008-0891
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2008-1672
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2016-7055
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2016-7056
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2017-3731
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2017-3732
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2017-3735
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2017-3736
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2017-3738
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2018-0732
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2018-0734
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2018-0735
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2018-0737
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2018-0739
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2019-1543
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2019-1547
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2019-1549
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2019-1551
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2019-1563
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2020-1967
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2020-1971
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2021-23840
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2021-23841
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2021-3449
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2021-3450
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2021-3711
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2021-3712