CVE-2018-12892
An issue was discovered in Xen 4.7 through 4.10.x. libxl fails to pass the readonly flag to qemu...
An issue was discovered in Xen 4.7 through 4.10.x. libxl fails to pass the readonly flag to qemu when setting up a SCSI disk, due to what was probably an erroneous merge conflict resolution. Malicious guest administrators or (in some situations) users may be able to write to supposedly read-only disk images. Only emulated SCSI disks (specified as "sd" in the libxl disk configuration, or an equivalent) are affected. IDE disks ("hd") are not affected (because attempts to make them readonly are rejected). Additionally, CDROM devices (that is, devices specified to be presented to the guest as CDROMs, regardless of the nature of the backing storage on the host) are not affected; they are always read only. Only systems using qemu-xen (rather than qemu-xen-traditional) as the device model version are vulnerable. Only systems using libxl or libxl-based toolstacks are vulnerable. (This includes xl, and libvirt with the libxl driver.) The vulnerability is present in Xen versions 4.7 and later. (In earlier versions, provided that the patch for XSA-142 has been applied, attempts to create read only disks are rejected.) If the host and guest together usually support PVHVM, the issue is exploitable only if the malicious guest administrator has control of the guest kernel or guest kernel command line.
Attack profile
How easy it is to exploit
- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges needed
- Low
- User interaction
- None
What an attacker can affect
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
Exploit likelihood
What each source reports
NVD Score used
9.9
An issue was discovered in Xen 4.7 through 4.10.x. libxl fails to pass the readonly flag to qemu when setting up a SCSI disk, due to what was probably an erroneous merge conflict resolution. Malicious guest administrators or (in some situations) users may be able to write to supposedly read-only disk images. Only emulated SCSI disks (specified as "sd" in the libxl disk configuration, or an equivalent) are affected. IDE disks ("hd") are not affected (because attempts to make them readonly are rejected). Additionally, CDROM devices (that is, devices specified to be presented to the guest as CDROMs, regardless of the nature of the backing storage on the host) are not affected; they are always read only. Only systems using qemu-xen (rather than qemu-xen-traditional) as the device model version are vulnerable. Only systems using libxl or libxl-based toolstacks are vulnerable. (This includes xl, and libvirt with the libxl driver.) The vulnerability is present in Xen versions 4.7 and later. (In earlier versions, provided that the patch for XSA-142 has been applied, attempts to create read only disks are rejected.) If the host and guest together usually support PVHVM, the issue is exploitable only if the malicious guest administrator has control of the guest kernel or guest kernel command line.
- Record
CVE-2018-12892- CVSS 3.0
- 9.9 Critical
CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H - CVSS 2.0
- 6.5 Medium
AV:N/AC:L/Au:S/C:P/I:P/A:P - Weakness
- CWE-200
- Updated
- 2026-11-02
CVE List No score
An issue was discovered in Xen 4.7 through 4.10.x. libxl fails to pass the readonly flag to qemu when setting up a SCSI disk, due to what was probably an erroneous merge conflict resolution. Malicious guest administrators or (in some situations) users may be able to write to supposedly read-only disk images. Only emulated SCSI disks (specified as "sd" in the libxl disk configuration, or an equivalent) are affected. IDE disks ("hd") are not affected (because attempts to make them readonly are rejected). Additionally, CDROM devices (that is, devices specified to be presented to the guest as CDROMs, regardless of the nature of the backing storage on the host) are not affected; they are always read only. Only systems using qemu-xen (rather than qemu-xen-traditional) as the device model version are vulnerable. Only systems using libxl or libxl-based toolstacks are vulnerable. (This includes xl, and libvirt with the libxl driver.) The vulnerability is present in Xen versions 4.7 and later. (In earlier versions, provided that the patch for XSA-142 has been applied, attempts to create read only disks are rejected.) If the host and guest together usually support PVHVM, the issue is exploitable only if the malicious guest administrator has control of the guest kernel or guest kernel command line.
- Record
CVE-2018-12892- Updated
- 2026-11-02
EUVDEUVD-2018-4845 No score
An issue was discovered in Xen 4.7 through 4.10.x. libxl fails to pass the readonly flag to qemu when setting up a SCSI disk, due to what was probably an erroneous merge conflict resolution. Malicious guest administrators or (in some situations) users may be able to write to supposedly read-only disk images. Only emulated SCSI disks (specified as "sd" in the libxl disk configuration, or an equivalent) are affected. IDE disks ("hd") are not affected (because attempts to make them readonly are rejected). Additionally, CDROM devices (that is, devices specified to be presented to the guest as CDROMs, regardless of the nature of the backing storage on the host) are not affected; they are always read only. Only systems using qemu-xen (rather than qemu-xen-traditional) as the device model version are vulnerable. Only systems using libxl or libxl-based toolstacks are vulnerable. (This includes xl, and libvirt with the libxl driver.) The vulnerability is present in Xen versions 4.7 and later. (In earlier versions, provided that the patch for XSA-142 has been applied, attempts to create read only disks are rejected.) If the host and guest together usually support PVHVM, the issue is exploitable only if the malicious guest administrator has control of the guest kernel or guest kernel command line.
- Record
EUVD-2018-4845- Updated
- 2026-11-03
GitHub AdvisoriesGHSA-pv22-mjm8-4f83
9.9
An issue was discovered in Xen 4.7 through 4.10.x. libxl fails to pass the readonly flag to qemu...
An issue was discovered in Xen 4.7 through 4.10.x. libxl fails to pass the readonly flag to qemu when setting up a SCSI disk, due to what was probably an erroneous merge conflict resolution. Malicious guest administrators or (in some situations) users may be able to write to supposedly read-only disk images. Only emulated SCSI disks (specified as "sd" in the libxl disk configuration, or an equivalent) are affected. IDE disks ("hd") are not affected (because attempts to make them readonly are rejected). Additionally, CDROM devices (that is, devices specified to be presented to the guest as CDROMs, regardless of the nature of the backing storage on the host) are not affected; they are always read only. Only systems using qemu-xen (rather than qemu-xen-traditional) as the device model version are vulnerable. Only systems using libxl or libxl-based toolstacks are vulnerable. (This includes xl, and libvirt with the libxl driver.) The vulnerability is present in Xen versions 4.7 and later. (In earlier versions, provided that the patch for XSA-142 has been applied, attempts to create read only disks are rejected.) If the host and guest together usually support PVHVM, the issue is exploitable only if the malicious guest administrator has control of the guest kernel or guest kernel command line.
- Record
GHSA-pv22-mjm8-4f83- CVSS 3.0
- 9.9 Critical
CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H - Weakness
- CWE-200
- Updated
- 2026-11-02
OSVALPINE-CVE-2018-12892
9.9
An issue was discovered in Xen 4.7 through 4.10.x. libxl fails to pass the readonly flag to qemu when setting up a SCSI disk, due to what was probably an erroneous merge conflict resolution. Malicious guest administrators or (in some situations) users may be able to write to supposedly read-only disk images. Only emulated SCSI disks (specified as "sd" in the libxl disk configuration, or an equivalent) are affected. IDE disks ("hd") are not affected (because attempts to make them readonly are rejected). Additionally, CDROM devices (that is, devices specified to be presented to the guest as CDROMs, regardless of the nature of the backing storage on the host) are not affected; they are always read only. Only systems using qemu-xen (rather than qemu-xen-traditional) as the device model version are vulnerable. Only systems using libxl or libxl-based toolstacks are vulnerable. (This includes xl, and libvirt with the libxl driver.) The vulnerability is present in Xen versions 4.7 and later. (In earlier versions, provided that the patch for XSA-142 has been applied, attempts to create read only disks are rejected.) If the host and guest together usually support PVHVM, the issue is exploitable only if the malicious guest administrator has control of the guest kernel or guest kernel command line.
- Record
ALPINE-CVE-2018-12892- CVSS 3.0
- 9.9 Critical
CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H - Updated
- 2026-11-02
OSV
9.9
An issue was discovered in Xen 4.7 through 4.10.x. libxl fails to pass the readonly flag to qemu when setting up a SCSI disk, due to what was probably an erroneous merge conflict resolution. Malicious guest administrators or (in some situations) users may be able to write to supposedly read-only disk images. Only emulated SCSI disks (specified as "sd" in the libxl disk configuration, or an equivalent) are affected. IDE disks ("hd") are not affected (because attempts to make them readonly are rejected). Additionally, CDROM devices (that is, devices specified to be presented to the guest as CDROMs, regardless of the nature of the backing storage on the host) are not affected; they are always read only. Only systems using qemu-xen (rather than qemu-xen-traditional) as the device model version are vulnerable. Only systems using libxl or libxl-based toolstacks are vulnerable. (This includes xl, and libvirt with the libxl driver.) The vulnerability is present in Xen versions 4.7 and later. (In earlier versions, provided that the patch for XSA-142 has been applied, attempts to create read only disks are rejected.) If the host and guest together usually support PVHVM, the issue is exploitable only if the malicious guest administrator has control of the guest kernel or guest kernel command line.
- Record
CVE-2018-12892- CVSS 3.0
- 9.9 Critical
CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H - Updated
- 2026-11-02
Show 7 moreShow less
OSVDEBIAN-CVE-2018-12892
9.9
An issue was discovered in Xen 4.7 through 4.10.x. libxl fails to pass the readonly flag to qemu when setting up a SCSI disk, due to what was probably an erroneous merge conflict resolution. Malicious guest administrators or (in some situations) users may be able to write to supposedly read-only disk images. Only emulated SCSI disks (specified as "sd" in the libxl disk configuration, or an equivalent) are affected. IDE disks ("hd") are not affected (because attempts to make them readonly are rejected). Additionally, CDROM devices (that is, devices specified to be presented to the guest as CDROMs, regardless of the nature of the backing storage on the host) are not affected; they are always read only. Only systems using qemu-xen (rather than qemu-xen-traditional) as the device model version are vulnerable. Only systems using libxl or libxl-based toolstacks are vulnerable. (This includes xl, and libvirt with the libxl driver.) The vulnerability is present in Xen versions 4.7 and later. (In earlier versions, provided that the patch for XSA-142 has been applied, attempts to create read only disks are rejected.) If the host and guest together usually support PVHVM, the issue is exploitable only if the malicious guest administrator has control of the guest kernel or guest kernel command line.
- Record
DEBIAN-CVE-2018-12892- CVSS 3.0
- 9.9 Critical
CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H - Updated
- 2026-11-02
OSVUBUNTU-CVE-2018-12892
9.9
An issue was discovered in Xen 4.7 through 4.10.x. libxl fails to pass the readonly flag to qemu when setting up a SCSI disk, due to what was probably an erroneous merge conflict resolution. Malicious guest administrators or (in some situations) users may be able to write to supposedly read-only disk images. Only emulated SCSI disks (specified as "sd" in the libxl disk configuration, or an equivalent) are affected. IDE disks ("hd") are not affected (because attempts to make them readonly are rejected). Additionally, CDROM devices (that is, devices specified to be presented to the guest as CDROMs, regardless of the nature of the backing storage on the host) are not affected; they are always read only. Only systems using qemu-xen (rather than qemu-xen-traditional) as the device model version are vulnerable. Only systems using libxl or libxl-based toolstacks are vulnerable. (This includes xl, and libvirt with the libxl driver.) The vulnerability is present in Xen versions 4.7 and later. (In earlier versions, provided that the patch for XSA-142 has been applied, attempts to create read only disks are rejected.) If the host and guest together usually support PVHVM, the issue is exploitable only if the malicious guest administrator has control of the guest kernel or guest kernel command line.
- Record
UBUNTU-CVE-2018-12892- CVSS 3.0
- 9.9 Critical
CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H - Updated
- 2026-11-02
OSVopenSUSE-SU-2024:11520-1 No score
xen-4.15.1_01-1.2 on GA media
These are all security issues fixed in the xen-4.15.1_01-1.2 package on the GA media of openSUSE Tumbleweed.
- Record
openSUSE-SU-2024:11520-1- Updated
- 2026-11-02
OSVSUSE-SU-2018:1981-1 No score
Security update for xen
This update for xen fixes the following issues:
Security issues fixed:
- CVE-2018-3665: Fix Lazy FP Save/Restore issue (XSA-267) (bsc#1095242).
- CVE-2018-12891: Fix possible Denial of Service (DoS) via certain PV MMU operations that affect the entire host (XSA-264) (bsc#1097521).
- CVE-2018-12892: Fix libxl to honour the readonly flag on HVM emulated SCSI disks (XSA-266) (bsc#1097523).
- CVE-2018-12893: Fix crash/Denial of Service (DoS) via safety check (XSA-265) (bsc#1097522).
Bug fixes:
- bsc#1027519: Add upstream patches from January.
- bsc#1098403: Fix regression introduced by changes for bsc#1079730. A PV domU without qcow2 and/or vfb has no qemu attached. Ignore QMP errors for PV domUs to handle PV domUs with and without an attached qemu-xen.
- bsc#1087289: Fix xen scheduler crash.
- Record
SUSE-SU-2018:1981-1- Updated
- 2026-11-02
OSVSUSE-SU-2018:2059-1 No score
Security update for xen
This update for xen fixes the following issues:
Security issues fixed:
- CVE-2018-3665: Fix Lazy FP Save/Restore issue (XSA-267) (bsc#1095242).
- CVE-2018-12891: Fix possible Denial of Service (DoS) via certain PV MMU operations that affect the entire host (XSA-264) (bsc#1097521).
- CVE-2018-12892: Fix libxl to honour the readonly flag on HVM emulated SCSI disks (XSA-266) (bsc#1097523).
- CVE-2018-12893: Fix crash/Denial of Service (DoS) via safety check (XSA-265) (bsc#1097522).
- CVE-2018-11806: Fix heap buffer overflow while reassembling fragmented datagrams (bsc#1096224).
Bug fixes:
- bsc#1027519: Add upstream patches from January.
- bsc#1087289: Fix xen scheduler crash.
- Record
SUSE-SU-2018:2059-1- Updated
- 2026-11-02
OSVSUSE-SU-2018:2081-1 No score
Security update for xen
This update for xen fixes the following issues:
Security issues fixed:
- CVE-2018-12891: Fix preemption checks bypass in x86 PV MM handling (XSA-264) (bsc#1097521).
- CVE-2018-12892: Fix libxl failure to honour readonly flag on HVM emulated SCSI disks (XSA-266) (bsc#1097523).
- CVE-2018-12893: Fix #DB exception safety check that could be triggered by a guest (XSA-265) (bsc#1097522).
- CVE-2018-11806: Fix heap buffer overflow while reassembling fragmented datagrams (bsc#1096224).
- CVE-2018-3665: Fix lazy FP Save/Restore (XSA-267) (bsc#1095242).
Bug fixes:
- bsc#1027519: Update to Xen 4.7.6 bug fix only release.
- bsc#1087289: Xen BUG at sched_credit.c:1663.
- bsc#1094725:
virsh blockresizedoes not work with Xen qdisks.
- Record
SUSE-SU-2018:2081-1- Updated
- 2026-11-02
OSVSUSE-SU-2018:2081-2 No score
Security update for xen
This update for xen fixes the following issues:
Security issues fixed:
- CVE-2018-12891: Fix preemption checks bypass in x86 PV MM handling (XSA-264) (bsc#1097521).
- CVE-2018-12892: Fix libxl failure to honour readonly flag on HVM emulated SCSI disks (XSA-266) (bsc#1097523).
- CVE-2018-12893: Fix #DB exception safety check that could be triggered by a guest (XSA-265) (bsc#1097522).
- CVE-2018-11806: Fix heap buffer overflow while reassembling fragmented datagrams (bsc#1096224).
- CVE-2018-3665: Fix lazy FP Save/Restore (XSA-267) (bsc#1095242).
Bug fixes:
- bsc#1027519: Update to Xen 4.7.6 bug fix only release.
- bsc#1087289: Xen BUG at sched_credit.c:1663.
- bsc#1094725:
virsh blockresizedoes not work with Xen qdisks.
- Record
SUSE-SU-2018:2081-2- Updated
- 2026-11-02
Affected products
Affected packages
| Package | Affected | Fixed |
|---|---|---|
xenAlpine:v3.10 |
4.7.0 up to 4.11.0-r0 | 4.11.0-r0 |
xenAlpine:v3.11 |
4.7.0 up to 4.11.0-r0 | 4.11.0-r0 |
xenAlpine:v3.12 |
4.7.0 up to 4.11.0-r0 | 4.11.0-r0 |
xenAlpine:v3.13 |
4.7.0 up to 4.11.0-r0 | 4.11.0-r0 |
xenAlpine:v3.14 |
4.7.0 up to 4.11.0-r0 | 4.11.0-r0 |
xenAlpine:v3.15 |
4.7.0 up to 4.11.0-r0 | 4.11.0-r0 |
xenAlpine:v3.16 |
4.7.0 up to 4.11.0-r0 | 4.11.0-r0 |
xenAlpine:v3.17 |
4.7.0 up to 4.11.0-r0 | 4.11.0-r0 |
xenAlpine:v3.18 |
4.7.0 up to 4.11.0-r0 | 4.11.0-r0 |
xenAlpine:v3.19 |
4.7.0 up to 4.11.0-r0 | 4.11.0-r0 |
Show 27 moreShow less
| Package | Affected | Fixed |
|---|---|---|
xenAlpine:v3.20 |
4.7.0 up to 4.11.0-r0 | 4.11.0-r0 |
xenAlpine:v3.21 |
4.7.0 up to 4.11.0-r0 | 4.11.0-r0 |
xenAlpine:v3.22 |
4.7.0 up to 4.11.0-r0 | 4.11.0-r0 |
xenAlpine:v3.23 |
4.7.0 up to 4.11.0-r0 | 4.11.0-r0 |
xenAlpine:v3.24 |
4.7.0 up to 4.11.0-r0 | 4.11.0-r0 |
xenAlpine:v3.5 |
4.7.0 up to 4.7.6-r0 | 4.7.6-r0 |
xenAlpine:v3.6 |
4.7.0 up to 4.8.4-r0 | 4.8.4-r0 |
xenAlpine:v3.7 |
4.7.0 up to 4.9.3-r0 | 4.9.3-r0 |
xenAlpine:v3.8 |
4.7.0 up to 4.10.1-r3 | 4.10.1-r3 |
xenAlpine:v3.9 |
4.7.0 up to 4.11.0-r0 | 4.11.0-r0 |
xenDebian:12 |
before 4.8.3+xsa267+shim4.10.1+xsa267-1+deb9u9 | 4.8.3+xsa267+shim4.10.1+xsa267-1+deb9u9 |
xenDebian:13 |
before 4.8.3+xsa267+shim4.10.1+xsa267-1+deb9u9 | 4.8.3+xsa267+shim4.10.1+xsa267-1+deb9u9 |
xenDebian:14 |
before 4.8.3+xsa267+shim4.10.1+xsa267-1+deb9u9 | 4.8.3+xsa267+shim4.10.1+xsa267-1+deb9u9 |
xenDebian:9 From an advisory covering 3 CVEs |
before 4.8.3+xsa267+shim4.10.1+xsa267-1+deb9u9, plus listed versions 4.8.1-1+deb9u14.8.1-1+deb9u24.8.1-1+deb9u34.8.2+xsa245-0+deb9u14.8.3+comet2+shim4.10.0+comet3-1+deb9u4 Show 5 moreShow less4.8.3+comet2+shim4.10.0+comet3-1+deb9u4.14.8.3+comet2+shim4.10.0+comet3-1+deb9u54.8.3+xsa262+shim4.10.0+comet3-1+deb9u64.8.3+xsa262+shim4.10.0+comet3-1+deb9u74.8.3+xsa267+shim4.10.1+xsa267-1+deb9u8 |
4.8.3+xsa267+shim4.10.1+xsa267-1+deb9u9 |
xenSUSE:Linux Enterprise Module for Basesystem 15 From an advisory covering 4 CVEs |
before 4.10.1_06-3.3.1 | 4.10.1_06-3.3.1 |
xenSUSE:Linux Enterprise Module for Server Applications 15 From an advisory covering 4 CVEs |
before 4.10.1_06-3.3.1 | 4.10.1_06-3.3.1 |
xenSUSE:Linux Enterprise Desktop 12 SP3 From an advisory covering 5 CVEs |
before 4.9.2_08-3.35.2 | 4.9.2_08-3.35.2 |
xenSUSE:Linux Enterprise Software Development Kit 12 SP3 From an advisory covering 5 CVEs |
before 4.9.2_08-3.35.2 | 4.9.2_08-3.35.2 |
xenSUSE:Linux Enterprise Server 12 SP3 From an advisory covering 5 CVEs |
before 4.9.2_08-3.35.2 | 4.9.2_08-3.35.2 |
xenSUSE:Linux Enterprise Server for SAP Applications 12 SP3 From an advisory covering 5 CVEs |
before 4.9.2_08-3.35.2 | 4.9.2_08-3.35.2 |
xenSUSE:OpenStack Cloud 7 From an advisory covering 5 CVEs |
before 4.7.6_02-43.36.1 | 4.7.6_02-43.36.1 |
xenSUSE:Linux Enterprise Server for SAP Applications 12 SP2 From an advisory covering 5 CVEs |
before 4.7.6_02-43.36.1 | 4.7.6_02-43.36.1 |
xenSUSE:Linux Enterprise Server 12 SP2-LTSS From an advisory covering 5 CVEs |
before 4.7.6_02-43.36.1 | 4.7.6_02-43.36.1 |
xenSUSE:Enterprise Storage 4 From an advisory covering 5 CVEs |
before 4.7.6_02-43.36.1 | 4.7.6_02-43.36.1 |
xenSUSE:Linux Enterprise Server 12 SP2-BCL From an advisory covering 5 CVEs |
before 4.7.6_02-43.36.1 | 4.7.6_02-43.36.1 |
xenUbuntu:18.04:LTS |
All versions, plus listed versions 4.9.0-0ubuntu34.9.0-0ubuntu44.9.2-0ubuntu1 |
None known |
xenopenSUSE:Tumbleweed From an advisory covering 93 CVEs |
before 4.15.1_01-1.2 | 4.15.1_01-1.2 |
History
| Recorded | Changed | Sources |
|---|---|---|
| affected, facts | ||
| aliases | EUVD | |
| first indexed | CVE List, GitHub Advisories, NVD, OSV |
Dates are when Every CVE recorded each change. Upstream dates may differ.
In short
CVE-2018-12892 is a critical vulnerability (CVSS 9.9) in Xen, published June 27, 2018. No source lists public exploit code. EPSS puts the chance of exploitation in the next 30 days at 2.47%, the 84th percentile. Fixed in xen 4.11.0-r0.
References
debian.org/security/2018/dsa-4236
security.gentoo.org/glsa/201810-06
securityfocus.com/bid/104571
xenbits.xen.org/xsa/advisory-266.html
securitytracker.com/id/1041203
openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2018/06/27/12
Show 114 moreShow less
nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2018-12892
github.com/advisories/GHSA-pv22-mjm8-4f83
security.alpinelinux.org/vuln/CVE-2018-12892
security-tracker.debian.org/tracker/CVE-2018-12892
suse.com/support/update/announcement/2018/suse-su-20181981-1
bugzilla.suse.com/1027519
bugzilla.suse.com/1079730
bugzilla.suse.com/1087289
bugzilla.suse.com/1095242
bugzilla.suse.com/1097521
bugzilla.suse.com/1097522
bugzilla.suse.com/1097523
bugzilla.suse.com/1098403
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2018-12891
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2018-12892
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2018-12893
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2018-3665
suse.com/support/update/announcement/2018/suse-su-20182059-1
bugzilla.suse.com/1096224
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2018-11806
suse.com/support/update/announcement/2018/suse-su-20182081-1
bugzilla.suse.com/1094725
suse.com/support/update/announcement/2018/suse-su-20182081-2
ubuntu.com/security/CVE-2018-12892
cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2018-12892
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2007-1320
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2007-1366
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2007-3919
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2016-10013
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2016-10024
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2016-10025
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2016-7777
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2016-7908
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2016-7909
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2016-8667
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2016-8669
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2016-8910
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2016-9377
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2016-9379
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2016-9381
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2016-9382
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2016-9383
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2016-9384
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2016-9385
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2016-9386
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2016-9637
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2016-9921
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2016-9932
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2017-12135
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2017-12136
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2017-12137
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2017-2615
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2017-2620
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2017-5753
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2017-6505
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2017-8309
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2017-9330
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2018-10471
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2018-10472
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2018-10981
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2018-10982
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2018-12126
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2018-15468
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2018-15469
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2018-15470
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2018-18883
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2018-19961
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2018-19963
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2018-19964
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2018-19965
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2018-19966
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2018-19967
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2018-3639
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2018-3646
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2018-5244
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2018-7540
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2018-7541
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2018-7542
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2018-8897
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2019-17349
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2020-0543
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2020-11739
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2020-11740
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2020-11742
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2020-11743
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2020-15563
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2020-15565
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2020-15566
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2020-15567
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2020-25595
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2020-25596
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2020-25597
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2020-25598
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2020-25599
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2020-25600
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2020-25601
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2020-25602
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2020-25603
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2020-25604
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2020-27670
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2020-27671
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2020-27672
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2020-27674
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2020-28368
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2020-29040
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2020-29480
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2020-29481
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2020-29483
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2020-29484
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2020-29566
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2020-29567
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2020-29570
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2020-29571
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2021-28687