CVE-2021-43854
Inefficient Regular Expression Complexity in nltk
NLTK (Natural Language Toolkit) is a suite of open source Python modules, data sets, and tutorials supporting research and development in Natural Language Processing. Versions prior to 3.6.5 are vulnerable to regular expression denial of service (ReDoS) attacks. The vulnerability is present in PunktSentenceTokenizer, sent_tokenize and word_tokenize. Any users of this class, or these two functions, are vulnerable to the ReDoS attack. In short, a specifically crafted long input to any of these vulnerable functions will cause them to take a significant amount of execution time. If your program relies on any of the vulnerable functions for tokenizing unpredictable user input, then we would strongly recommend upgrading to a version of NLTK without the vulnerability. For users unable to upgrade the execution time can be bounded by limiting the maximum length of an input to any of the vulnerable functions. Our recommendation is to implement such a limit.
Attack profile
How easy it is to exploit
- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges needed
- None
- User interaction
- None
What an attacker can affect
- Confidentiality
- None
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- High
Exploit likelihood
What each source reports
CVE List Score used
7.5
Inefficient Regular Expression Complexity in nltk
NLTK (Natural Language Toolkit) is a suite of open source Python modules, data sets, and tutorials supporting research and development in Natural Language Processing. Versions prior to 3.6.5 are vulnerable to regular expression denial of service (ReDoS) attacks. The vulnerability is present in PunktSentenceTokenizer, sent_tokenize and word_tokenize. Any users of this class, or these two functions, are vulnerable to the ReDoS attack. In short, a specifically crafted long input to any of these vulnerable functions will cause them to take a significant amount of execution time. If your program relies on any of the vulnerable functions for tokenizing unpredictable user input, then we would strongly recommend upgrading to a version of NLTK without the vulnerability. For users unable to upgrade the execution time can be bounded by limiting the maximum length of an input to any of the vulnerable functions. Our recommendation is to implement such a limit.
- Record
CVE-2021-43854- CVSS 3.1
- 7.5 High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H - Weakness
- CWE-400
- Updated
- 2026-11-02
EUVDEUVD-2021-0148
7.5
NLTK (Natural Language Toolkit) is a suite of open source Python modules, data sets, and tutorials supporting research and development in Natural Language Processing. Versions prior to 3.6.5 are vulnerable to regular expression denial of service (ReDoS) attacks. The vulnerability is present in PunktSentenceTokenizer, sent_tokenize and word_tokenize. Any users of this class, or these two functions, are vulnerable to the ReDoS attack. In short, a specifically crafted long input to any of these vulnerable functions will cause them to take a significant amount of execution time. If your program relies on any of the vulnerable functions for tokenizing unpredictable user input, then we would strongly recommend upgrading to a version of NLTK without the vulnerability. For users unable to upgrade the execution time can be bounded by limiting the maximum length of an input to any of the vulnerable functions. Our recommendation is to implement such a limit.
- Record
EUVD-2021-0148- CVSS 3.1
- 7.5 High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H - Updated
- 2026-11-03
GitHub AdvisoriesGHSA-f8m6-h2c7-8h9x
8.7
Inefficient Regular Expression Complexity in nltk (word_tokenize, sent_tokenize)
Impact
The vulnerability is present in PunktSentenceTokenizer, sent_tokenize and word_tokenize. Any users of this class, or these two functions, are vulnerable to a Regular Expression Denial of Service (ReDoS) attack.
In short, a specifically crafted long input to any of these vulnerable functions will cause them to take a significant amount of execution time. The effect of this vulnerability is noticeable with the following example:
from nltk.tokenize import word_tokenize
n = 8
for length in [10**i for i in range(2, n)]:
# Prepare a malicious input
text = "a" * length
start_t = time.time()
# Call `word_tokenize` and naively measure the execution time
word_tokenize(text)
print(f"A length of {length:<{n}} takes {time.time() - start_t:.4f}s")
Which gave the following output during testing:
A length of 100 takes 0.0060s
A length of 1000 takes 0.0060s
A length of 10000 takes 0.6320s
A length of 100000 takes 56.3322s
...
I canceled the execution of the program after running it for several hours.
If your program relies on any of the vulnerable functions for tokenizing unpredictable user input, then we would strongly recommend upgrading to a version of NLTK without the vulnerability, or applying the workaround described below.
Patches
The problem has been patched in NLTK 3.6.6. After the fix, running the above program gives the following result:
A length of 100 takes 0.0070s
A length of 1000 takes 0.0010s
A length of 10000 takes 0.0060s
A length of 100000 takes 0.0400s
A length of 1000000 takes 0.3520s
A length of 10000000 takes 3.4641s
This output shows a linear relationship in execution time versus input length, which is desirable for regular expressions. We recommend updating to NLTK 3.6.6+ if possible.
Workarounds
The execution time of the vulnerable functions is exponential to the length of a malicious input. With other words, the execution time can be bounded by limiting the maximum length of an input to any of the vulnerable functions. Our recommendation is to implement such a limit.
References
- The issue showcasing the vulnerability: https://github.com/nltk/nltk/issues/2866
- The pull request containing considerably more information on the vulnerability, and the fix: https://github.com/nltk/nltk/pull/2869
- The commit containing the fix: 1405aad979c6b8080dbbc8e0858f89b2e3690341
- Information on CWE-1333: Inefficient Regular Expression Complexity: https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/1333.html
For more information
If you have any questions or comments about this advisory:
- Open an issue in github.com/nltk/nltk
- Email us at [email protected]
- Record
GHSA-f8m6-h2c7-8h9x- CVSS 4.0
- 8.7 High
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N - CVSS 3.1
- 7.5 High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H - Weakness
- CWE-400
- Updated
- 2026-11-02
NVD
7.5
NLTK (Natural Language Toolkit) is a suite of open source Python modules, data sets, and tutorials supporting research and development in Natural Language Processing. Versions prior to 3.6.5 are vulnerable to regular expression denial of service (ReDoS) attacks. The vulnerability is present in PunktSentenceTokenizer, sent_tokenize and word_tokenize. Any users of this class, or these two functions, are vulnerable to the ReDoS attack. In short, a specifically crafted long input to any of these vulnerable functions will cause them to take a significant amount of execution time. If your program relies on any of the vulnerable functions for tokenizing unpredictable user input, then we would strongly recommend upgrading to a version of NLTK without the vulnerability. For users unable to upgrade the execution time can be bounded by limiting the maximum length of an input to any of the vulnerable functions. Our recommendation is to implement such a limit.
- Record
CVE-2021-43854- CVSS 3.1
- 7.5 High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H - CVSS 2.0
- 5.0 Medium
AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:N/I:N/A:P - Weakness
- CWE-400
- Updated
- 2026-11-02
OSV
7.5
NLTK (Natural Language Toolkit) is a suite of open source Python modules, data sets, and tutorials supporting research and development in Natural Language Processing. Versions prior to 3.6.5 are vulnerable to regular expression denial of service (ReDoS) attacks. The vulnerability is present in PunktSentenceTokenizer, sent_tokenize and word_tokenize. Any users of this class, or these two functions, are vulnerable to the ReDoS attack. In short, a specifically crafted long input to any of these vulnerable functions will cause them to take a significant amount of execution time. If your program relies on any of the vulnerable functions for tokenizing unpredictable user input, then we would strongly recommend upgrading to a version of NLTK without the vulnerability. For users unable to upgrade the execution time can be bounded by limiting the maximum length of an input to any of the vulnerable functions. Our recommendation is to implement such a limit.
- Record
CVE-2021-43854- CVSS 3.1
- 7.5 High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H - Updated
- 2026-11-02
OSVDEBIAN-CVE-2021-43854
7.5
NLTK (Natural Language Toolkit) is a suite of open source Python modules, data sets, and tutorials supporting research and development in Natural Language Processing. Versions prior to 3.6.5 are vulnerable to regular expression denial of service (ReDoS) attacks. The vulnerability is present in PunktSentenceTokenizer, sent_tokenize and word_tokenize. Any users of this class, or these two functions, are vulnerable to the ReDoS attack. In short, a specifically crafted long input to any of these vulnerable functions will cause them to take a significant amount of execution time. If your program relies on any of the vulnerable functions for tokenizing unpredictable user input, then we would strongly recommend upgrading to a version of NLTK without the vulnerability. For users unable to upgrade the execution time can be bounded by limiting the maximum length of an input to any of the vulnerable functions. Our recommendation is to implement such a limit.
- Record
DEBIAN-CVE-2021-43854- CVSS 3.1
- 7.5 High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H - Updated
- 2026-11-02
Show 4 moreShow less
OSVGHSA-f8m6-h2c7-8h9x
8.7
Inefficient Regular Expression Complexity in nltk (word_tokenize, sent_tokenize)
Impact
The vulnerability is present in PunktSentenceTokenizer, sent_tokenize and word_tokenize. Any users of this class, or these two functions, are vulnerable to a Regular Expression Denial of Service (ReDoS) attack.
In short, a specifically crafted long input to any of these vulnerable functions will cause them to take a significant amount of execution time. The effect of this vulnerability is noticeable with the following example:
from nltk.tokenize import word_tokenize
n = 8
for length in [10**i for i in range(2, n)]:
# Prepare a malicious input
text = "a" * length
start_t = time.time()
# Call `word_tokenize` and naively measure the execution time
word_tokenize(text)
print(f"A length of {length:<{n}} takes {time.time() - start_t:.4f}s")
Which gave the following output during testing:
A length of 100 takes 0.0060s
A length of 1000 takes 0.0060s
A length of 10000 takes 0.6320s
A length of 100000 takes 56.3322s
...
I canceled the execution of the program after running it for several hours.
If your program relies on any of the vulnerable functions for tokenizing unpredictable user input, then we would strongly recommend upgrading to a version of NLTK without the vulnerability, or applying the workaround described below.
Patches
The problem has been patched in NLTK 3.6.6. After the fix, running the above program gives the following result:
A length of 100 takes 0.0070s
A length of 1000 takes 0.0010s
A length of 10000 takes 0.0060s
A length of 100000 takes 0.0400s
A length of 1000000 takes 0.3520s
A length of 10000000 takes 3.4641s
This output shows a linear relationship in execution time versus input length, which is desirable for regular expressions. We recommend updating to NLTK 3.6.6+ if possible.
Workarounds
The execution time of the vulnerable functions is exponential to the length of a malicious input. With other words, the execution time can be bounded by limiting the maximum length of an input to any of the vulnerable functions. Our recommendation is to implement such a limit.
References
- The issue showcasing the vulnerability: https://github.com/nltk/nltk/issues/2866
- The pull request containing considerably more information on the vulnerability, and the fix: https://github.com/nltk/nltk/pull/2869
- The commit containing the fix: 1405aad979c6b8080dbbc8e0858f89b2e3690341
- Information on CWE-1333: Inefficient Regular Expression Complexity: https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/1333.html
For more information
If you have any questions or comments about this advisory:
- Open an issue in github.com/nltk/nltk
- Email us at [email protected]
- Record
GHSA-f8m6-h2c7-8h9x- CVSS 4.0
- 8.7 High
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N - CVSS 3.1
- 7.5 High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H - Weakness
- CWE-400
- Updated
- 2026-11-02
OSVUBUNTU-CVE-2021-43854
7.5
NLTK (Natural Language Toolkit) is a suite of open source Python modules, data sets, and tutorials supporting research and development in Natural Language Processing. Versions prior to 3.6.5 are vulnerable to regular expression denial of service (ReDoS) attacks. The vulnerability is present in PunktSentenceTokenizer, sent_tokenize and word_tokenize. Any users of this class, or these two functions, are vulnerable to the ReDoS attack. In short, a specifically crafted long input to any of these vulnerable functions will cause them to take a significant amount of execution time. If your program relies on any of the vulnerable functions for tokenizing unpredictable user input, then we would strongly recommend upgrading to a version of NLTK without the vulnerability. For users unable to upgrade the execution time can be bounded by limiting the maximum length of an input to any of the vulnerable functions. Our recommendation is to implement such a limit.
- Record
UBUNTU-CVE-2021-43854- CVSS 3.1
- 7.5 High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H - Updated
- 2026-11-02
OSVPYSEC-2021-859 No score
NLTK (Natural Language Toolkit) is a suite of open source Python modules, data sets, and tutorials supporting research and development in Natural Language Processing. Versions prior to 3.6.5 are vulnerable to regular expression denial of service (ReDoS) attacks. The vulnerability is present in PunktSentenceTokenizer, sent_tokenize and word_tokenize. Any users of this class, or these two functions, are vulnerable to the ReDoS attack. In short, a specifically crafted long input to any of these vulnerable functions will cause them to take a significant amount of execution time. If your program relies on any of the vulnerable functions for tokenizing unpredictable user input, then we would strongly recommend upgrading to a version of NLTK without the vulnerability. For users unable to upgrade the execution time can be bounded by limiting the maximum length of an input to any of the vulnerable functions. Our recommendation is to implement such a limit.
- Record
PYSEC-2021-859- Updated
- 2026-11-02
OSVUSN-7365-1 No score
nltk vulnerabilities
It was discovered that NLTK contained a regex that is susceptible to catastrophic backtracking. An attacker could possibly use this issue to cause a denial of service. (CVE-2021-3842, CVE-2021-43854)
- Record
USN-7365-1- Updated
- 2026-11-02
Affected products
Affected packages
| Package | Affected | Fixed |
|---|---|---|
nltkPyPI |
before 3.6.6 | 3.6.6 |
nltkDebian:12 |
before 3.6.7-1 | 3.6.7-1 |
nltkDebian:13 |
before 3.6.7-1 | 3.6.7-1 |
nltkDebian:14 |
before 3.6.7-1 | 3.6.7-1 |
nltkPyPI |
before 3.6.6, plus listed versions 0.80.90.9.30.9.40.9.5 Show 45 moreShow less0.9.60.9.70.9.80.9.92.0.12.0.1rc12.0.1rc2-git2.0.1rc32.0.1rc42.0.22.0.32.0.42.0.52.0b42.0b52.0b62.0b72.0b82.0b93.0.03.0.0b13.0.0b23.0.13.0.23.0.33.0.43.0.53.13.23.2.13.2.23.2.33.2.43.2.53.33.43.4.13.4.23.4.33.4.43.4.53.53.5b13.63.6.1 |
3.6.6 |
nltkPyPI |
before 3.6.5, plus listed versions 0.80.90.9.30.9.40.9.5 Show 45 moreShow less0.9.60.9.70.9.80.9.92.0.12.0.1rc12.0.1rc2-git2.0.1rc32.0.1rc42.0.22.0.32.0.42.0.52.0b42.0b52.0b62.0b72.0b82.0b93.0.03.0.0b13.0.0b23.0.13.0.23.0.33.0.43.0.53.13.23.2.13.2.23.2.33.2.43.2.53.33.43.4.13.4.23.4.33.4.43.4.53.53.5b13.63.6.1 |
3.6.5 |
nltkUbuntu:Pro:14.04:LTS |
before 2.0~b9-0ubuntu4.1~esm4, plus listed versions 2.0~b9-0ubuntu42.0~b9-0ubuntu4.1~esm2 |
2.0~b9-0ubuntu4.1~esm4 |
nltkUbuntu:Pro:16.04:LTS |
before 3.1-1ubuntu0.1+esm2, plus listed versions 3.0.4-13.0.5-13.1-13.1-1ubuntu0.13.1-1ubuntu0.1+esm1 |
3.1-1ubuntu0.1+esm2 |
nltkUbuntu:Pro:18.04:LTS |
before 3.2.5-1ubuntu0.1+esm2, plus listed versions 3.2.4-13.2.5-13.2.5-1ubuntu0.13.2.5-1ubuntu0.1+esm1 |
3.2.5-1ubuntu0.1+esm2 |
nltkUbuntu:Pro:20.04:LTS |
before 3.4.5-2ubuntu0.1~esm2, plus listed versions 3.4.5-13.4.5-23.4.5-2ubuntu0.1~esm1 |
3.4.5-2ubuntu0.1~esm2 |
Show 4 moreShow less
| Package | Affected | Fixed |
|---|---|---|
nltkUbuntu:Pro:14.04:LTS From an advisory covering 2 CVEs |
before 2.0~b9-0ubuntu4.1~esm4, plus listed versions 2.0~b9-0ubuntu42.0~b9-0ubuntu4.1~esm2 |
2.0~b9-0ubuntu4.1~esm4 |
nltkUbuntu:Pro:16.04:LTS From an advisory covering 2 CVEs |
before 3.1-1ubuntu0.1+esm2, plus listed versions 3.0.4-13.0.5-13.1-13.1-1ubuntu0.13.1-1ubuntu0.1+esm1 |
3.1-1ubuntu0.1+esm2 |
nltkUbuntu:Pro:18.04:LTS From an advisory covering 2 CVEs |
before 3.2.5-1ubuntu0.1+esm2, plus listed versions 3.2.4-13.2.5-13.2.5-1ubuntu0.13.2.5-1ubuntu0.1+esm1 |
3.2.5-1ubuntu0.1+esm2 |
nltkUbuntu:Pro:20.04:LTS From an advisory covering 2 CVEs |
before 3.4.5-2ubuntu0.1~esm2, plus listed versions 3.4.5-13.4.5-23.4.5-2ubuntu0.1~esm1 |
3.4.5-2ubuntu0.1~esm2 |
History
| Recorded | Changed | Sources |
|---|---|---|
| affected, facts | ||
| aliases | EUVD | |
| first indexed | CVE List, GitHub Advisories, NVD, OSV |
Dates are when Every CVE recorded each change. Upstream dates may differ.
In short
CVE-2021-43854 is a high vulnerability (CVSS 7.5) in Nltk, published December 23, 2021. No source lists public exploit code. EPSS puts the chance of exploitation in the next 30 days at 2.79%, the 86th percentile. Fixed in nltk 3.6.6.
References
github.com/nltk/nltk/security/advisories/GHSA-f8m6-h2c7-8h9x
github.com/nltk/nltk/issues/2866
github.com/nltk/nltk/pull/2869
github.com/nltk/nltk/commit/1405aad979c6b8080dbbc8e0858f89b2e3690341
nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2021-43854
github.com/pypa/advisory-database/tree/main/vulns/nltk/PYSEC-2021-859.yaml
Left out here: 7 versions. The JSON record has them.