CVE-2022-1343
OCSP_basic_verify may incorrectly verify the response signing certificate
CVE-2022-1343 is a medium vulnerability (CVSS 5.3) in Openssl, published May 3, 2022. No source lists public exploit code. EPSS puts the chance of exploitation in the next 30 days at 2.14%, the 82nd percentile. Fixed in openssl-src 300.0.6.
The function OCSP_basic_verify verifies the signer certificate on an OCSP response. In the case where the (non-default) flag OCSP_NOCHECKS is used then the response will be positive (meaning a successful verification) even in the case where the response signing certificate fails to verify. It is anticipated that most users of OCSP_basic_verify will not use the OCSP_NOCHECKS flag. In this case the OCSP_basic_verify function will return a negative value (indicating a fatal error) in the case of a certificate verification failure. The normal expected return value in this case would be 0. This issue also impacts the command line OpenSSL "ocsp" application. When verifying an ocsp response with the "-no_cert_checks" option the command line application will report that the verification is successful even though it has in fact failed. In this case the incorrect successful response will also be accompanied by error messages showing the failure and contradicting the apparently successful result. Fixed in OpenSSL 3.0.3 (Affected 3.0.0,3.0.1,3.0.2).
Attack profile
How easy it is to exploit
- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges needed
- None
- User interaction
- None
What an attacker can affect
- Confidentiality
- None
- Integrity
- Low
- Availability
- None
Exploit likelihood
What each source reports
NVD Score used
5.3
The function OCSP_basic_verify verifies the signer certificate on an OCSP response. In the case where the (non-default) flag OCSP_NOCHECKS is used then the response will be positive (meaning a successful verification) even in the case where the response signing certificate fails to verify. It is anticipated that most users of OCSP_basic_verify will not use the OCSP_NOCHECKS flag. In this case the OCSP_basic_verify function will return a negative value (indicating a fatal error) in the case of a certificate verification failure. The normal expected return value in this case would be 0. This issue also impacts the command line OpenSSL "ocsp" application. When verifying an ocsp response with the "-no_cert_checks" option the command line application will report that the verification is successful even though it has in fact failed. In this case the incorrect successful response will also be accompanied by error messages showing the failure and contradicting the apparently successful result. Fixed in OpenSSL 3.0.3 (Affected 3.0.0,3.0.1,3.0.2).
- Record
CVE-2022-1343- CVSS 3.1
- 5.3 Medium
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N - CVSS 2.0
- 4.3 Medium
AV:N/AC:M/Au:N/C:N/I:P/A:N - Weakness
- CWE-295
- Updated
- 2026-11-02
CVE List
5.3
OCSP_basic_verify may incorrectly verify the response signing certificate
The function OCSP_basic_verify verifies the signer certificate on an OCSP response. In the case where the (non-default) flag OCSP_NOCHECKS is used then the response will be positive (meaning a successful verification) even in the case where the response signing certificate fails to verify. It is anticipated that most users of OCSP_basic_verify will not use the OCSP_NOCHECKS flag. In this case the OCSP_basic_verify function will return a negative value (indicating a fatal error) in the case of a certificate verification failure. The normal expected return value in this case would be 0. This issue also impacts the command line OpenSSL "ocsp" application. When verifying an ocsp response with the "-no_cert_checks" option the command line application will report that the verification is successful even though it has in fact failed. In this case the incorrect successful response will also be accompanied by error messages showing the failure and contradicting the apparently successful result. Fixed in OpenSSL 3.0.3 (Affected 3.0.0,3.0.1,3.0.2).
- Record
CVE-2022-1343- CVSS 3.1
- 5.3 Medium
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N - Weakness
- CWE-295
- Updated
- 2026-11-02
EUVDEUVD-2022-4552
5.3
The function OCSP_basic_verify verifies the signer certificate on an OCSP response. In the case where the (non-default) flag OCSP_NOCHECKS is used then the response will be positive (meaning a successful verification) even in the case where the response signing certificate fails to verify. It is anticipated that most users of OCSP_basic_verify will not use the OCSP_NOCHECKS flag. In this case the OCSP_basic_verify function will return a negative value (indicating a fatal error) in the case of a certificate verification failure. The normal expected return value in this case would be 0. This issue also impacts the command line OpenSSL "ocsp" application. When verifying an ocsp response with the "-no_cert_checks" option the command line application will report that the verification is successful even though it has in fact failed. In this case the incorrect successful response will also be accompanied by error messages showing the failure and contradicting the apparently successful result. Fixed in OpenSSL 3.0.3 (Affected 3.0.0,3.0.1,3.0.2).
- Record
EUVD-2022-4552- CVSS 3.1
- 5.3 Medium
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N - Updated
- 2026-11-02
GitHub AdvisoriesGHSA-mfm6-r9g2-q4r7
5.3
`OCSP_basic_verify` may incorrectly verify the response signing certificate
The function OCSP_basic_verify verifies the signer certificate on an OCSP response. In the case where the (non-default) flag OCSP_NOCHECKS is used then the response will be positive (meaning a successful verification) even in the case where the response signing certificate fails to verify. It is anticipated that most users of OCSP_basic_verify will not use the OCSP_NOCHECKS flag. In this case the OCSP_basic_verify function will return a negative value (indicating a fatal error) in the case of a certificate verification failure. The normal expected return value in this case would be 0. This issue also impacts the command line OpenSSL "ocsp" application. When verifying an ocsp response with the "-no_cert_checks" option the command line application will report that the verification is successful even though it has in fact failed. In this case the incorrect successful response will also be accompanied by error messages showing the failure and contradicting the apparently successful result. Fixed in OpenSSL 3.0.3 (Affected 3.0.0,3.0.1,3.0.2).
- Record
GHSA-mfm6-r9g2-q4r7- CVSS 3.1
- 5.3 Medium
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N - Weakness
- CWE-295
- Updated
- 2026-11-02
OSVALPINE-CVE-2022-1343
5.3
The function OCSP_basic_verify verifies the signer certificate on an OCSP response. In the case where the (non-default) flag OCSP_NOCHECKS is used then the response will be positive (meaning a successful verification) even in the case where the response signing certificate fails to verify. It is anticipated that most users of OCSP_basic_verify will not use the OCSP_NOCHECKS flag. In this case the OCSP_basic_verify function will return a negative value (indicating a fatal error) in the case of a certificate verification failure. The normal expected return value in this case would be 0. This issue also impacts the command line OpenSSL "ocsp" application. When verifying an ocsp response with the "-no_cert_checks" option the command line application will report that the verification is successful even though it has in fact failed. In this case the incorrect successful response will also be accompanied by error messages showing the failure and contradicting the apparently successful result. Fixed in OpenSSL 3.0.3 (Affected 3.0.0,3.0.1,3.0.2).
- Record
ALPINE-CVE-2022-1343- CVSS 3.1
- 5.3 Medium
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N - Updated
- 2026-11-03
OSVBELL-CVE-2022-1343
5.3
CVE-2022-1343 does not affect BellSoft software
- Record
BELL-CVE-2022-1343- CVSS 3.1
- 5.3 Medium
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N - Updated
- 2026-11-02
Show 9 moreShow less
OSV
5.3
OCSP_basic_verify may incorrectly verify the response signing certificate
The function OCSP_basic_verify verifies the signer certificate on an OCSP response. In the case where the (non-default) flag OCSP_NOCHECKS is used then the response will be positive (meaning a successful verification) even in the case where the response signing certificate fails to verify. It is anticipated that most users of OCSP_basic_verify will not use the OCSP_NOCHECKS flag. In this case the OCSP_basic_verify function will return a negative value (indicating a fatal error) in the case of a certificate verification failure. The normal expected return value in this case would be 0. This issue also impacts the command line OpenSSL "ocsp" application. When verifying an ocsp response with the "-no_cert_checks" option the command line application will report that the verification is successful even though it has in fact failed. In this case the incorrect successful response will also be accompanied by error messages showing the failure and contradicting the apparently successful result. Fixed in OpenSSL 3.0.3 (Affected 3.0.0,3.0.1,3.0.2).
- Record
CVE-2022-1343- CVSS 3.1
- 5.3 Medium
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N - Updated
- 2026-11-02
OSVGHSA-mfm6-r9g2-q4r7
5.3
`OCSP_basic_verify` may incorrectly verify the response signing certificate
The function OCSP_basic_verify verifies the signer certificate on an OCSP response. In the case where the (non-default) flag OCSP_NOCHECKS is used then the response will be positive (meaning a successful verification) even in the case where the response signing certificate fails to verify. It is anticipated that most users of OCSP_basic_verify will not use the OCSP_NOCHECKS flag. In this case the OCSP_basic_verify function will return a negative value (indicating a fatal error) in the case of a certificate verification failure. The normal expected return value in this case would be 0. This issue also impacts the command line OpenSSL "ocsp" application. When verifying an ocsp response with the "-no_cert_checks" option the command line application will report that the verification is successful even though it has in fact failed. In this case the incorrect successful response will also be accompanied by error messages showing the failure and contradicting the apparently successful result. Fixed in OpenSSL 3.0.3 (Affected 3.0.0,3.0.1,3.0.2).
- Record
GHSA-mfm6-r9g2-q4r7- CVSS 3.1
- 5.3 Medium
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N - Weakness
- CWE-295
- Updated
- 2026-11-02
OSVRHSA-2022:6224
7.5
Red Hat Security Advisory: openssl security and bug fix update
- Record
RHSA-2022:6224- CVSS 3.1
- 7.5 High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H - Updated
- 2026-11-02
OSVRUSTSEC-2022-0027
5.3
`OCSP_basic_verify` may incorrectly verify the response signing certificate
The function OCSP_basic_verify verifies the signer certificate on an OCSP
response. In the case where the (non-default) flag OCSP_NOCHECKS is used then
the response will be positive (meaning a successful verification) even in the
case where the response signing certificate fails to verify.
It is anticipated that most users of OCSP_basic_verify will not use the
OCSP_NOCHECKS flag. In this case the OCSP_basic_verify function will return
a negative value (indicating a fatal error) in the case of a certificate
verification failure. The normal expected return value in this case would be 0.
- Record
RUSTSEC-2022-0027- CVSS 3.1
- 5.3 Medium
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N - Updated
- 2026-11-02
OSVUBUNTU-CVE-2022-1343
5.3
The function OCSP_basic_verify verifies the signer certificate on an OCSP response. In the case where the (non-default) flag OCSP_NOCHECKS is used then the response will be positive (meaning a successful verification) even in the case where the response signing certificate fails to verify. It is anticipated that most users of OCSP_basic_verify will not use the OCSP_NOCHECKS flag. In this case the OCSP_basic_verify function will return a negative value (indicating a fatal error) in the case of a certificate verification failure. The normal expected return value in this case would be 0. This issue also impacts the command line OpenSSL "ocsp" application. When verifying an ocsp response with the "-no_cert_checks" option the command line application will report that the verification is successful even though it has in fact failed. In this case the incorrect successful response will also be accompanied by error messages showing the failure and contradicting the apparently successful result. Fixed in OpenSSL 3.0.3 (Affected 3.0.0,3.0.1,3.0.2).
- Record
UBUNTU-CVE-2022-1343- CVSS 3.1
- 5.3 Medium
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N - Updated
- 2026-11-02
OSVALSA-2022:6224 No score
Moderate: openssl security and bug fix update
OpenSSL is a toolkit that implements the Secure Sockets Layer (SSL) and Transport Layer Security (TLS) protocols, as well as a full-strength general-purpose cryptography library. Security Fix(es):
- openssl: c_rehash script allows command injection (CVE-2022-1292)
- openssl: Signer certificate verification returns inaccurate response when using OCSP_NOCHECKS (CVE-2022-1343)
- openssl: OPENSSL_LH_flush() breaks reuse of memory (CVE-2022-1473)
- openssl: the c_rehash script allows command injection (CVE-2022-2068)
- openssl: AES OCB fails to encrypt some bytes (CVE-2022-2097) For more details about the security issue(s), including the impact, a CVSS score, acknowledgments, and other related information, refer to the CVE page(s) listed in the References section. Bug Fix(es):
- openssl occasionally sends internal error to gnutls when using FFDHE (BZ#2080323)
- openssl req defaults to 3DES (BZ#2085499)
- OpenSSL accepts custom elliptic curve parameters when p is large [almalinux-9] (BZ#2085508)
- OpenSSL mustn't work with ECDSA with explicit curve parameters in FIPS mode (BZ#2085521)
- openssl s_server -groups secp256k1 in FIPS fails because X25519/X448 (BZ#2086554)
- Converting FIPS power-on self test to KAT (BZ#2086866)
- Small RSA keys work for some operations in FIPS mode (BZ#2091938)
- FIPS provider doesn't block RSA encryption for key transport (BZ#2091977)
- OpenSSL testsuite certificates expired (BZ#2095696)
- [IBM 9.1 HW OPT] POWER10 performance enhancements for cryptography: OpenSSL (BZ#2103044)
- [FIPS lab review] self-test (BZ#2112978)
- [FIPS lab review] DH tuning (BZ#2115856)
- [FIPS lab review] EC tuning (BZ#2115857)
- [FIPS lab review] RSA tuning (BZ#2115858)
- [FIPS lab review] RAND tuning (BZ#2115859)
- [FIPS lab review] zeroization (BZ#2115861)
- [FIPS lab review] HKDF limitations (BZ#2118388)
- Record
ALSA-2022:6224- Updated
- 2026-11-02
OSVopenSUSE-SU-2024:12204-1 No score
libopenssl-3-devel-3.0.5-1.1 on GA media
These are all security issues fixed in the libopenssl-3-devel-3.0.5-1.1 package on the GA media of openSUSE Tumbleweed.
- Record
openSUSE-SU-2024:12204-1- Updated
- 2026-11-02
OSVSUSE-SU-2022:2306-1 No score
Security update for openssl-3
This update for openssl-3 fixes the following issues:
- CVE-2022-2068: Fixed more shell code injection issues in c_rehash. (bsc#1200550)
- CVE-2022-1292: Properly sanitise shell metacharacters in c_rehash script. (bsc#1199166)
- CVE-2022-1343: Fixed incorrect signature verification in OCSP_basic_verify (bsc#1199167).
- CVE-2022-2097: Fixed partial missing encryption in AES OCB mode (bsc#1201099).
- CVE-2022-1434: Fixed incorrect MAC key used in the RC4-MD5 ciphersuite (bsc#1199168).
- CVE-2022-1473: Fixed resource leakage when decoding certificates and keys (bsc#1199169).
- Record
SUSE-SU-2022:2306-1- Updated
- 2026-11-02
OSVUSN-5402-1 No score
openssl, openssl1.0 vulnerabilities
Elison Niven discovered that OpenSSL incorrectly handled the c_rehash script. A local attacker could possibly use this issue to execute arbitrary commands when c_rehash is run. (CVE-2022-1292)
Raul Metsma discovered that OpenSSL incorrectly verified certain response signing certificates. A remote attacker could possibly use this issue to spoof certain response signing certificates. This issue only affected Ubuntu 22.04 LTS. (CVE-2022-1343)
Tom Colley discovered that OpenSSL used the incorrect MAC key in the RC4-MD5 ciphersuite. In non-default configurations were RC4-MD5 is enabled, a remote attacker could possibly use this issue to modify encrypted communications. This issue only affected Ubuntu 22.04 LTS. (CVE-2022-1434)
Aliaksei Levin discovered that OpenSSL incorrectly handled resources when decoding certificates and keys. A remote attacker could possibly use this issue to cause OpenSSL to consume resources, leading to a denial of service. This issue only affected Ubuntu 22.04 LTS. (CVE-2022-1473)
- Record
USN-5402-1- Updated
- 2026-11-02
Affected products
- openssl
- netapp a250 firmware
- netapp a700s firmware
- netapp active iq unified manager
- netapp aff 500f firmware
- netapp aff 8300 firmware
- netapp aff 8700 firmware
- netapp aff a400 firmware
- netapp clustered data ontap
- netapp clustered data ontap antivirus connector
- netapp fabric-attached storage a400 firmware
- netapp fas 500f firmware
Show 19 moreShow less
- netapp fas 8300 firmware
- netapp fas 8700 firmware
- netapp h300e firmware
- netapp h300s firmware
- netapp h410s firmware
- netapp h500e firmware
- netapp h500s firmware
- netapp h700e firmware
- netapp h700s firmware
- netapp santricity smi-s provider
- netapp smi-s provider
- netapp snapmanager
- netapp solidfire\, enterprise sds \& hci storage node
- netapp solidfire \& hci management node
- siemens simatic s7-1500 cpu 1518-4 pn/dp mfp
- siemens simatic s7-1500 cpu 1518f-4 pn/dp mfp
- siemens simatic s7-1500 tm mfp - gnu/linux subsystem
- siemens sinamics perfect harmony gh180
- siemens siplus s7-1500 cpu 1518-4 pn/dp mfp
Affected packages
| Package | Affected | Fixed |
|---|---|---|
openssl-srccrates.io |
300.0.0 up to 300.0.6 | 300.0.6 |
opensslAlpine:v3.17 |
3.0.0 up to 3.0.3-r0 | 3.0.3-r0 |
opensslAlpine:v3.18 |
3.0.0 up to 3.0.3-r0 | 3.0.3-r0 |
opensslAlpine:v3.19 |
3.0.0 up to 3.0.3-r0 | 3.0.3-r0 |
opensslAlpine:v3.20 |
3.0.0 up to 3.0.3-r0 | 3.0.3-r0 |
opensslAlpine:v3.21 |
3.0.0 up to 3.0.3-r0 | 3.0.3-r0 |
opensslAlpine:v3.22 |
3.0.0 up to 3.0.3-r0 | 3.0.3-r0 |
opensslAlpine:v3.23 |
3.0.0 up to 3.0.3-r0 | 3.0.3-r0 |
opensslAlpine:v3.24 |
3.0.0 up to 3.0.3-r0 | 3.0.3-r0 |
openssl3Alpine:v3.15 |
before 3.0.3-r0 | 3.0.3-r0 |
Show 22 moreShow less
| Package | Affected | Fixed |
|---|---|---|
openssl3Alpine:v3.16 |
before 3.0.3-r0 | 3.0.3-r0 |
opensslAlmaLinux:9 |
before 1:3.0.1-41.el9_0 | 1:3.0.1-41.el9_0 |
openssl-develAlmaLinux:9 |
before 1:3.0.1-41.el9_0 | 1:3.0.1-41.el9_0 |
openssl-libsAlmaLinux:9 |
before 1:3.0.1-41.el9_0 | 1:3.0.1-41.el9_0 |
openssl-perlAlmaLinux:9 |
before 1:3.0.1-41.el9_0 | 1:3.0.1-41.el9_0 |
openssl-debuginfoRed Hat:enterprise_linux:9::appstream |
before 1:3.0.1-41.el9_0 | 1:3.0.1-41.el9_0 |
openssl-debugsourceRed Hat:enterprise_linux:9::appstream |
before 1:3.0.1-41.el9_0 | 1:3.0.1-41.el9_0 |
openssl-develRed Hat:enterprise_linux:9::appstream |
before 1:3.0.1-41.el9_0 | 1:3.0.1-41.el9_0 |
openssl-libs-debuginfoRed Hat:enterprise_linux:9::appstream |
before 1:3.0.1-41.el9_0 | 1:3.0.1-41.el9_0 |
openssl-perlRed Hat:enterprise_linux:9::appstream |
before 1:3.0.1-41.el9_0 | 1:3.0.1-41.el9_0 |
opensslRed Hat:enterprise_linux:9::baseos |
before 1:3.0.1-41.el9_0 | 1:3.0.1-41.el9_0 |
openssl-debuginfoRed Hat:enterprise_linux:9::baseos |
before 1:3.0.1-41.el9_0 | 1:3.0.1-41.el9_0 |
openssl-debugsourceRed Hat:enterprise_linux:9::baseos |
before 1:3.0.1-41.el9_0 | 1:3.0.1-41.el9_0 |
openssl-libsRed Hat:enterprise_linux:9::baseos |
before 1:3.0.1-41.el9_0 | 1:3.0.1-41.el9_0 |
openssl-libs-debuginfoRed Hat:enterprise_linux:9::baseos |
before 1:3.0.1-41.el9_0 | 1:3.0.1-41.el9_0 |
openssl-3SUSE:Linux Enterprise Module for Basesystem 15 SP4 |
before 3.0.1-150400.4.7.1 | 3.0.1-150400.4.7.1 |
openssl-3openSUSE:Leap 15.4 |
before 3.0.1-150400.4.7.1 | 3.0.1-150400.4.7.1 |
opensslUbuntu:22.04:LTS |
before 3.0.2-0ubuntu1.1, plus listed versions 1.1.1l-1ubuntu13.0.0-1ubuntu13.0.1-0ubuntu13.0.2-0ubuntu1 |
3.0.2-0ubuntu1.1 |
opensslUbuntu:18.04:LTS |
before 1.1.1-1ubuntu2.1~18.04.17, plus listed versions 1.0.2g-1ubuntu131.0.2g-1ubuntu141.0.2n-1ubuntu11.1.0g-2ubuntu11.1.0g-2ubuntu2 Show 17 moreShow less1.1.0g-2ubuntu31.1.0g-2ubuntu41.1.0g-2ubuntu4.11.1.0g-2ubuntu4.31.1.1-1ubuntu2.1~18.04.11.1.1-1ubuntu2.1~18.04.21.1.1-1ubuntu2.1~18.04.31.1.1-1ubuntu2.1~18.04.41.1.1-1ubuntu2.1~18.04.51.1.1-1ubuntu2.1~18.04.61.1.1-1ubuntu2.1~18.04.71.1.1-1ubuntu2.1~18.04.81.1.1-1ubuntu2.1~18.04.91.1.1-1ubuntu2.1~18.04.101.1.1-1ubuntu2.1~18.04.131.1.1-1ubuntu2.1~18.04.141.1.1-1ubuntu2.1~18.04.15 |
1.1.1-1ubuntu2.1~18.04.17 |
openssl1.0Ubuntu:18.04:LTS |
before 1.0.2n-1ubuntu5.9, plus listed versions 1.0.2n-1ubuntu21.0.2n-1ubuntu31.0.2n-1ubuntu41.0.2n-1ubuntu51.0.2n-1ubuntu5.1 Show 7 moreShow less1.0.2n-1ubuntu5.21.0.2n-1ubuntu5.31.0.2n-1ubuntu5.41.0.2n-1ubuntu5.51.0.2n-1ubuntu5.61.0.2n-1ubuntu5.71.0.2n-1ubuntu5.8 |
1.0.2n-1ubuntu5.9 |
opensslUbuntu:20.04:LTS |
before 1.1.1f-1ubuntu2.13, plus listed versions 1.1.1c-1ubuntu41.1.1d-2ubuntu31.1.1d-2ubuntu61.1.1f-1ubuntu11.1.1f-1ubuntu2 Show 10 moreShow less1.1.1f-1ubuntu2.11.1.1f-1ubuntu2.21.1.1f-1ubuntu2.31.1.1f-1ubuntu2.41.1.1f-1ubuntu2.51.1.1f-1ubuntu2.81.1.1f-1ubuntu2.91.1.1f-1ubuntu2.101.1.1f-1ubuntu2.111.1.1f-1ubuntu2.12 |
1.1.1f-1ubuntu2.13 |
openssl-3openSUSE:Tumbleweed |
before 3.0.5-1.1 | 3.0.5-1.1 |
History
| When | Changed | Sources |
|---|---|---|
| 2026-11-02 | created | CVE List, EUVD, GitHub Advisories, NVD, OSV |
References
openssl.org/news/secadv/20220503.txt
git.openssl.org/gitweb?p=openssl.git%3Ba=commitdiff%3Bh=2eda98790c5c2741d76d23cc1e74b0dc4f4b391a
security.netapp.com/advisory/ntap-20220602-0009
cert-portal.siemens.com/productcert/pdf/ssa-953464.pdf
cert-portal.siemens.com/productcert/html/ssa-953464.html
cert-portal.siemens.com/productcert/html/ssa-419740.html
Show 85 moreShow less
cert-portal.siemens.com/productcert/html/ssa-794697.html
cert-portal.siemens.com/productcert/html/ssa-942865.html
cert-portal.siemens.com/productcert/html/ssa-398330.html
nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2022-1343
git.openssl.org/gitweb?p=openssl.git;a=commitdiff;h=2eda98790c5c2741d76d23cc1e74b0dc4f4b391a
rustsec.org/advisories/RUSTSEC-2022-0027.html
github.com/github/advisory-database/issues/405
github.com/advisories/GHSA-mfm6-r9g2-q4r7
security.alpinelinux.org/vuln/CVE-2022-1343
access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2022:6224
access.redhat.com/security/cve/CVE-2022-1292
access.redhat.com/security/cve/CVE-2022-1343
access.redhat.com/security/cve/CVE-2022-1473
access.redhat.com/security/cve/CVE-2022-2068
access.redhat.com/security/cve/CVE-2022-2097
bugzilla.redhat.com/2081494
bugzilla.redhat.com/2087911
bugzilla.redhat.com/2087913
bugzilla.redhat.com/2097310
bugzilla.redhat.com/2104905
errata.almalinux.org/9/ALSA-2022-6224.html
docs.bell-sw.com/security/cves/CVE-2022-1343
github.com/CVEProject/cvelistV5/tree/main/cves/2022/1xxx/CVE-2022-1343.json
access.redhat.com/security/updates/classification
bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2080323
bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2081494
bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2082584
bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2082585
bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2085499
bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2085500
bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2085521
bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2086554
bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2086866
bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2087234
bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2087911
bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2087913
bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2091938
bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2091977
bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2091994
bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2095696
bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2097310
bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2101346
bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2104905
bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2107530
bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2112978
bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2115856
bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2115857
bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2115858
bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2115859
bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2115861
bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2118388
security.access.redhat.com/data/csaf/v2/advisories/2022/rhsa-2022_6224.json
cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-1292
nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2022-1292
cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-1343
cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-1473
nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2022-1473
cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-2068
nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2022-2068
openssl.org/news/secadv/20220621.txt
cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2022-2097
nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2022-2097
openssl.org/news/secadv/20220705.txt
crates.io/crates/openssl-src
suse.com/support/update/announcement/2022/suse-su-20222306-1
bugzilla.suse.com/1185637
bugzilla.suse.com/1199166
bugzilla.suse.com/1199167
bugzilla.suse.com/1199168
bugzilla.suse.com/1199169
bugzilla.suse.com/1200550
bugzilla.suse.com/1201099
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2022-1292
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2022-1343
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2022-1434
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2022-1473
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2022-2068
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2022-2097
ubuntu.com/security/CVE-2022-1343
mta.openssl.org/pipermail/openssl-announce/2022-May/000224.html
ubuntu.com/security/notices/USN-5402-1
ubuntu.com/security/CVE-2022-1292
ubuntu.com/security/CVE-2022-1434
ubuntu.com/security/CVE-2022-1473
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2022-2274