CVE-2022-29197
Missing validation causes denial of service in TensorFlow via `UnsortedSegmentJoin`
TensorFlow is an open source platform for machine learning. Prior to versions 2.9.0, 2.8.1, 2.7.2, and 2.6.4, the implementation of tf.raw_ops.UnsortedSegmentJoin does not fully validate the input arguments. This results in a CHECK-failure which can be used to trigger a denial of service attack. The code assumes num_segments is a scalar but there is no validation for this before accessing its value. Versions 2.9.0, 2.8.1, 2.7.2, and 2.6.4 contain a patch for this issue.
Attack profile
How easy it is to exploit
- Attack vector
- Local
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges needed
- Low
- User interaction
- None
What an attacker can affect
- Confidentiality
- None
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- High
Exploit likelihood
What each source reports
CVE List Score used
5.5
Missing validation causes denial of service in TensorFlow via `UnsortedSegmentJoin`
TensorFlow is an open source platform for machine learning. Prior to versions 2.9.0, 2.8.1, 2.7.2, and 2.6.4, the implementation of tf.raw_ops.UnsortedSegmentJoin does not fully validate the input arguments. This results in a CHECK-failure which can be used to trigger a denial of service attack. The code assumes num_segments is a scalar but there is no validation for this before accessing its value. Versions 2.9.0, 2.8.1, 2.7.2, and 2.6.4 contain a patch for this issue.
- Record
CVE-2022-29197- CVSS 3.1
- 5.5 Medium
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H - Weakness
- CWE-20
- Updated
- 2026-11-02
EUVDEUVD-2022-4208
5.5
TensorFlow is an open source platform for machine learning. Prior to versions 2.9.0, 2.8.1, 2.7.2, and 2.6.4, the implementation of tf.raw_ops.UnsortedSegmentJoin does not fully validate the input arguments. This results in a CHECK-failure which can be used to trigger a denial of service attack. The code assumes num_segments is a scalar but there is no validation for this before accessing its value. Versions 2.9.0, 2.8.1, 2.7.2, and 2.6.4 contain a patch for this issue.
- Record
EUVD-2022-4208- CVSS 3.1
- 5.5 Medium
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H - Updated
- 2026-11-02
GitHub AdvisoriesGHSA-hrg5-737c-2p56
5.5
Missing validation causes denial of service via `UnsortedSegmentJoin`
Impact
The implementation of tf.raw_ops.UnsortedSegmentJoin does not fully validate the input arguments. This results in a CHECK-failure which can be used to trigger a denial of service attack:
import tensorflow as tf
tf.raw_ops.UnsortedSegmentJoin(
inputs=tf.constant("this", shape=[12], dtype=tf.string),
segment_ids=tf.constant(0, shape=[12], dtype=tf.int64),
num_segments=tf.constant(0, shape=[12], dtype=tf.int64))
The code assumes num_segments is a scalar but there is no validation for this before accessing its value:
const Tensor& num_segments_tensor = context->input(2);
OP_REQUIRES(context, num_segments_tensor.NumElements() != 0,
errors::InvalidArgument("Number of segments cannot be empty."));
auto num_segments = num_segments_tensor.scalar<NUM_SEGMENTS_TYPE>()();
Patches
We have patched the issue in GitHub commit 13d38a07ce9143e044aa737cfd7bb759d0e9b400.
The fix will be included in TensorFlow 2.9.0. We will also cherrypick this commit on TensorFlow 2.8.1, TensorFlow 2.7.2, and TensorFlow 2.6.4, as these are also affected and still in supported range.
For more information
Please consult our security guide for more information regarding the security model and how to contact us with issues and questions.
Attribution
This vulnerability has been reported by Neophytos Christou from Secure Systems Lab at Brown University.
- Record
GHSA-hrg5-737c-2p56- CVSS 3.1
- 5.5 Medium
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H - Weakness
- CWE-20
- Updated
- 2026-11-02
NVD
5.5
TensorFlow is an open source platform for machine learning. Prior to versions 2.9.0, 2.8.1, 2.7.2, and 2.6.4, the implementation of tf.raw_ops.UnsortedSegmentJoin does not fully validate the input arguments. This results in a CHECK-failure which can be used to trigger a denial of service attack. The code assumes num_segments is a scalar but there is no validation for this before accessing its value. Versions 2.9.0, 2.8.1, 2.7.2, and 2.6.4 contain a patch for this issue.
- Record
CVE-2022-29197- CVSS 3.1
- 5.5 Medium
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H - CVSS 2.0
- 2.1 Low
AV:L/AC:L/Au:N/C:N/I:N/A:P - Weakness
- CWE-20
- Updated
- 2026-11-02
OSV
5.5
Missing validation causes denial of service in TensorFlow via `UnsortedSegmentJoin`
TensorFlow is an open source platform for machine learning. Prior to versions 2.9.0, 2.8.1, 2.7.2, and 2.6.4, the implementation of tf.raw_ops.UnsortedSegmentJoin does not fully validate the input arguments. This results in a CHECK-failure which can be used to trigger a denial of service attack. The code assumes num_segments is a scalar but there is no validation for this before accessing its value. Versions 2.9.0, 2.8.1, 2.7.2, and 2.6.4 contain a patch for this issue.
- Record
CVE-2022-29197- CVSS 3.1
- 5.5 Medium
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H - Weakness
- CWE-20
- Updated
- 2026-11-02
OSVGHSA-hrg5-737c-2p56
5.5
Missing validation causes denial of service via `UnsortedSegmentJoin`
Impact
The implementation of tf.raw_ops.UnsortedSegmentJoin does not fully validate the input arguments. This results in a CHECK-failure which can be used to trigger a denial of service attack:
import tensorflow as tf
tf.raw_ops.UnsortedSegmentJoin(
inputs=tf.constant("this", shape=[12], dtype=tf.string),
segment_ids=tf.constant(0, shape=[12], dtype=tf.int64),
num_segments=tf.constant(0, shape=[12], dtype=tf.int64))
The code assumes num_segments is a scalar but there is no validation for this before accessing its value:
const Tensor& num_segments_tensor = context->input(2);
OP_REQUIRES(context, num_segments_tensor.NumElements() != 0,
errors::InvalidArgument("Number of segments cannot be empty."));
auto num_segments = num_segments_tensor.scalar<NUM_SEGMENTS_TYPE>()();
Patches
We have patched the issue in GitHub commit 13d38a07ce9143e044aa737cfd7bb759d0e9b400.
The fix will be included in TensorFlow 2.9.0. We will also cherrypick this commit on TensorFlow 2.8.1, TensorFlow 2.7.2, and TensorFlow 2.6.4, as these are also affected and still in supported range.
For more information
Please consult our security guide for more information regarding the security model and how to contact us with issues and questions.
Attribution
This vulnerability has been reported by Neophytos Christou from Secure Systems Lab at Brown University.
- Record
GHSA-hrg5-737c-2p56- CVSS 3.1
- 5.5 Medium
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H - Weakness
- CWE-20
- Updated
- 2026-11-02
Show 4 moreShow less
OSVPYSEC-2026-1009
5.5
Missing validation causes denial of service via `UnsortedSegmentJoin`
Impact
The implementation of tf.raw_ops.UnsortedSegmentJoin does not fully validate the input arguments. This results in a CHECK-failure which can be used to trigger a denial of service attack:
import tensorflow as tf
tf.raw_ops.UnsortedSegmentJoin(
inputs=tf.constant("this", shape=[12], dtype=tf.string),
segment_ids=tf.constant(0, shape=[12], dtype=tf.int64),
num_segments=tf.constant(0, shape=[12], dtype=tf.int64))
The code assumes num_segments is a scalar but there is no validation for this before accessing its value:
const Tensor& num_segments_tensor = context->input(2);
OP_REQUIRES(context, num_segments_tensor.NumElements() != 0,
errors::InvalidArgument("Number of segments cannot be empty."));
auto num_segments = num_segments_tensor.scalar<NUM_SEGMENTS_TYPE>()();
Patches
We have patched the issue in GitHub commit 13d38a07ce9143e044aa737cfd7bb759d0e9b400.
The fix will be included in TensorFlow 2.9.0. We will also cherrypick this commit on TensorFlow 2.8.1, TensorFlow 2.7.2, and TensorFlow 2.6.4, as these are also affected and still in supported range.
For more information
Please consult our security guide for more information regarding the security model and how to contact us with issues and questions.
Attribution
This vulnerability has been reported by Neophytos Christou from Secure Systems Lab at Brown University.
- Record
PYSEC-2026-1009- CVSS 3.1
- 5.5 Medium
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H - Updated
- 2026-11-02
OSVPYSEC-2026-3202
5.5
Missing validation causes denial of service via `UnsortedSegmentJoin`
Impact
The implementation of tf.raw_ops.UnsortedSegmentJoin does not fully validate the input arguments. This results in a CHECK-failure which can be used to trigger a denial of service attack:
import tensorflow as tf
tf.raw_ops.UnsortedSegmentJoin(
inputs=tf.constant("this", shape=[12], dtype=tf.string),
segment_ids=tf.constant(0, shape=[12], dtype=tf.int64),
num_segments=tf.constant(0, shape=[12], dtype=tf.int64))
The code assumes num_segments is a scalar but there is no validation for this before accessing its value:
const Tensor& num_segments_tensor = context->input(2);
OP_REQUIRES(context, num_segments_tensor.NumElements() != 0,
errors::InvalidArgument("Number of segments cannot be empty."));
auto num_segments = num_segments_tensor.scalar<NUM_SEGMENTS_TYPE>()();
Patches
We have patched the issue in GitHub commit 13d38a07ce9143e044aa737cfd7bb759d0e9b400.
The fix will be included in TensorFlow 2.9.0. We will also cherrypick this commit on TensorFlow 2.8.1, TensorFlow 2.7.2, and TensorFlow 2.6.4, as these are also affected and still in supported range.
For more information
Please consult our security guide for more information regarding the security model and how to contact us with issues and questions.
Attribution
This vulnerability has been reported by Neophytos Christou from Secure Systems Lab at Brown University.
- Record
PYSEC-2026-3202- CVSS 3.1
- 5.5 Medium
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H - Updated
- 2026-11-02
OSVPYSEC-2026-3341
5.5
Missing validation causes denial of service via `UnsortedSegmentJoin`
Impact
The implementation of tf.raw_ops.UnsortedSegmentJoin does not fully validate the input arguments. This results in a CHECK-failure which can be used to trigger a denial of service attack:
import tensorflow as tf
tf.raw_ops.UnsortedSegmentJoin(
inputs=tf.constant("this", shape=[12], dtype=tf.string),
segment_ids=tf.constant(0, shape=[12], dtype=tf.int64),
num_segments=tf.constant(0, shape=[12], dtype=tf.int64))
The code assumes num_segments is a scalar but there is no validation for this before accessing its value:
const Tensor& num_segments_tensor = context->input(2);
OP_REQUIRES(context, num_segments_tensor.NumElements() != 0,
errors::InvalidArgument("Number of segments cannot be empty."));
auto num_segments = num_segments_tensor.scalar<NUM_SEGMENTS_TYPE>()();
Patches
We have patched the issue in GitHub commit 13d38a07ce9143e044aa737cfd7bb759d0e9b400.
The fix will be included in TensorFlow 2.9.0. We will also cherrypick this commit on TensorFlow 2.8.1, TensorFlow 2.7.2, and TensorFlow 2.6.4, as these are also affected and still in supported range.
For more information
Please consult our security guide for more information regarding the security model and how to contact us with issues and questions.
Attribution
This vulnerability has been reported by Neophytos Christou from Secure Systems Lab at Brown University.
- Record
PYSEC-2026-3341- CVSS 3.1
- 5.5 Medium
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H - Updated
- 2026-11-02
OSVBIT-tensorflow-2022-29197 No score
Missing validation causes denial of service in TensorFlow via `UnsortedSegmentJoin`
TensorFlow is an open source platform for machine learning. Prior to versions 2.9.0, 2.8.1, 2.7.2, and 2.6.4, the implementation of tf.raw_ops.UnsortedSegmentJoin does not fully validate the input arguments. This results in a CHECK-failure which can be used to trigger a denial of service attack. The code assumes num_segments is a scalar but there is no validation for this before accessing its value. Versions 2.9.0, 2.8.1, 2.7.2, and 2.6.4 contain a patch for this issue.
- Record
BIT-tensorflow-2022-29197- Updated
- 2026-11-02
Affected products
Affected packages
| Package | Affected | Fixed |
|---|---|---|
tensorflowPyPI |
before 2.6.4 | 2.6.4 |
tensorflowPyPI |
2.7.0 up to 2.7.2 | 2.7.2 |
tensorflowPyPI |
2.8.0 up to 2.8.1 | 2.8.1 |
tensorflow-cpuPyPI |
before 2.6.4 | 2.6.4 |
tensorflow-cpuPyPI |
2.7.0 up to 2.7.2 | 2.7.2 |
tensorflow-cpuPyPI |
2.8.0 up to 2.8.1 | 2.8.1 |
tensorflow-gpuPyPI |
before 2.6.4 | 2.6.4 |
tensorflow-gpuPyPI |
2.7.0 up to 2.7.2 | 2.7.2 |
tensorflow-gpuPyPI |
2.8.0 up to 2.8.1 | 2.8.1 |
tensorflowBitnami |
before 2.6.4, 2.7.0 up to 2.7.2 | 2.6.42.7.2 |
Show 9 moreShow less
| Package | Affected | Fixed |
|---|---|---|
tensorflowPyPI |
before 2.6.4, plus listed versions 0.12.00.12.11.0.01.0.11.1.0 Show 45 moreShow less1.10.01.10.11.11.01.12.01.12.21.12.31.13.11.13.21.14.01.15.01.15.21.15.31.15.41.15.51.2.01.2.11.3.01.4.01.4.11.5.01.5.11.6.01.7.01.7.11.8.01.9.02.0.02.0.12.0.22.0.32.0.42.1.02.1.12.1.22.1.32.1.42.2.02.2.12.2.22.2.32.3.02.3.12.3.22.3.32.3.4 |
2.6.4 |
tensorflowPyPI |
2.7.0 up to 2.7.2, plus listed versions 2.7.1 |
2.7.2 |
tensorflow-cpuPyPI |
before 2.6.4, plus listed versions 1.15.02.1.02.1.12.1.22.1.3 Show 23 moreShow less2.1.42.2.02.2.12.2.22.2.32.3.02.3.12.3.22.3.32.3.42.4.02.4.12.4.22.4.32.4.42.5.02.5.12.5.22.5.32.6.02.6.12.6.22.6.3 |
2.6.4 |
tensorflow-cpuPyPI |
2.7.0 up to 2.7.2, plus listed versions 2.7.1 |
2.7.2 |
tensorflow-gpuPyPI |
before 2.6.4, plus listed versions 0.12.00.12.11.0.01.0.11.1.0 Show 45 moreShow less1.10.01.10.11.11.01.12.01.12.21.12.31.13.11.13.21.14.01.15.01.15.21.15.31.15.41.15.51.2.01.2.11.3.01.4.01.4.11.5.01.5.11.6.01.7.01.7.11.8.01.9.02.0.02.0.12.0.22.0.32.0.42.1.02.1.12.1.22.1.32.1.42.2.02.2.12.2.22.2.32.3.02.3.12.3.22.3.32.3.4 |
2.6.4 |
tensorflow-gpuPyPI |
2.7.0 up to 2.7.2, plus listed versions 2.7.1 |
2.7.2 |
tensorflow-gpuPyPI |
before 2.6.4, 2.7.0 up to 2.7.2, 2.8.0 up to 2.8.1, plus listed versions 0.12.00.12.11.0.01.0.11.1.0 Show 45 moreShow less1.10.01.10.11.11.01.12.01.12.21.12.31.13.11.13.21.14.01.15.01.15.21.15.31.15.41.15.51.2.01.2.11.3.01.4.01.4.11.5.01.5.11.6.01.7.01.7.11.8.01.9.02.0.02.0.12.0.22.0.32.0.42.1.02.1.12.1.22.1.32.1.42.2.02.2.12.2.22.2.32.3.02.3.12.3.22.3.32.3.4 |
2.6.42.7.22.8.1 |
tensorflowPyPI |
before 2.6.4, 2.7.0 up to 2.7.2, 2.8.0 up to 2.8.1, plus listed versions 0.12.00.12.11.0.01.0.11.1.0 Show 45 moreShow less1.10.01.10.11.11.01.12.01.12.21.12.31.13.11.13.21.14.01.15.01.15.21.15.31.15.41.15.51.2.01.2.11.3.01.4.01.4.11.5.01.5.11.6.01.7.01.7.11.8.01.9.02.0.02.0.12.0.22.0.32.0.42.1.02.1.12.1.22.1.32.1.42.2.02.2.12.2.22.2.32.3.02.3.12.3.22.3.32.3.4 |
2.6.42.7.22.8.1 |
tensorflow-cpuPyPI |
before 2.6.4, 2.7.0 up to 2.7.2, 2.8.0 up to 2.8.1, plus listed versions 1.15.02.1.02.1.12.1.22.1.3 Show 24 moreShow less2.1.42.2.02.2.12.2.22.2.32.3.02.3.12.3.22.3.32.3.42.4.02.4.12.4.22.4.32.4.42.5.02.5.12.5.22.5.32.6.02.6.12.6.22.6.32.7.1 |
2.6.42.7.22.8.1 |
History
| Recorded | Changed | Sources |
|---|---|---|
| first indexed | CVE List, EUVD, GitHub Advisories, NVD, OSV |
Dates are when Every CVE recorded each change. Upstream dates may differ.
In short
CVE-2022-29197 is a medium vulnerability (CVSS 5.5) in Google Tensorflow, published May 20, 2022. No source lists public exploit code. EPSS puts the chance of exploitation in the next 30 days at 0.33%, the 25th percentile. Fixed in tensorflow 2.6.4.
References
github.com/tensorflow/tensorflow/releases/tag/v2.6.4
github.com/tensorflow/tensorflow/releases/tag/v2.7.2
github.com/tensorflow/tensorflow/releases/tag/v2.8.1
github.com/tensorflow/tensorflow/releases/tag/v2.9.0
github.com/tensorflow/tensorflow/security/advisories/GHSA-hrg5-737c-2p56
github.com/tensorflow/tensorflow/commit/13d38a07ce9143e044aa737cfd7bb759d0e9b400
Show 8 moreShow less
github.com/tensorflow/tensorflow/blob/f3b9bf4c3c0597563b289c0512e98d4ce81f886e/tensorflow/core/kernels/unsorted_segment_join_op.cc
nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2022-29197
github.com/advisories/GHSA-hrg5-737c-2p56
github.com/CVEProject/cvelistV5/tree/main/cves/2022/29xxx/CVE-2022-29197.json
github.com/tensorflow/tensorflow
pypi.org/project/tensorflow-gpu
pypi.org/project/tensorflow
pypi.org/project/tensorflow-cpu
Left out here: 60 versions. The JSON record has them.