CVE-2022-35158
A vulnerability in the lua parser of TscanCode tsclua v2.15.01 allows attackers to cause a Denial...
A vulnerability in the lua parser of TscanCode tsclua v2.15.01 allows attackers to cause a Denial of Service (DoS) via a crafted lua script.
Attack profile
How easy it is to exploit
- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges needed
- None
- User interaction
- None
What an attacker can affect
- Confidentiality
- None
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- High
Exploit likelihood
What each source reports
NVD Score used
A vulnerability in the lua parser of TscanCode tsclua v2.15.01 allows attackers to cause a Denial of Service (DoS) via a crafted lua script.
- Record
CVE-2022-35158- CVSS 3.1
- 7.5 High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H - Updated
- 2026-11-02
CVE List No score
A vulnerability in the lua parser of TscanCode tsclua v2.15.01 allows attackers to cause a Denial of Service (DoS) via a crafted lua script.
- Record
CVE-2022-35158- Updated
- 2026-11-02
EUVDEUVD-2022-38052 No score
A vulnerability in the lua parser of TscanCode tsclua v2.15.01 allows attackers to cause a Denial of Service (DoS) via a crafted lua script.
- Record
EUVD-2022-38052- Updated
- 2026-11-03
GitHub AdvisoriesGHSA-fvr6-46cg-c4rj
A vulnerability in the lua parser of TscanCode tsclua v2.15.01 allows attackers to cause a Denial...
A vulnerability in the lua parser of TscanCode tsclua v2.15.01 allows attackers to cause a Denial of Service (DoS) via a crafted lua script.
- Record
GHSA-fvr6-46cg-c4rj- CVSS 3.1
- 7.5 High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H - Updated
- 2026-11-02
Affected products
History
| Recorded | Changed | Sources |
|---|---|---|
| aliases | EUVD | |
| first indexed | CVE List, GitHub Advisories, NVD |
Dates are when Every CVE recorded each change. Upstream dates may differ.
In short
CVE-2022-35158 is a high vulnerability (CVSS 7.5) in Tencent Tscancode, published August 3, 2022. No source lists public exploit code. EPSS puts the chance of exploitation in the next 30 days at 0.90%, the 59th percentile. No source names a fixed version.