Every CVE Search/ Get API key

CVE-2023-29003

SvelteKit has Insufficient Cross-Site Request Forgery Protection

8.8 HighFix available

SvelteKit is a web development framework. The SvelteKit framework offers developers an option to create simple REST APIs. This is done by defining a +server.js file, containing endpoint handlers for different HTTP methods.

SvelteKit provides out-of-the-box cross-site request forgery (CSRF) protection to its users. While the implementation does a sufficient job in mitigating common CSRF attacks, prior to version 1.15.1, the protection can be bypassed by simply specifying a different Content-Type header value.

If abused, this issue will allow malicious requests to be submitted from third-party domains, which can allow execution of operations within the context of the victim's session, and in extreme scenarios can lead to unauthorized access to users’ accounts.

SvelteKit 1.15.1 updates the is_form_content_type function call in the CSRF protection logic to include text/plain. As additional hardening of the CSRF protection mechanism against potential method overrides, SvelteKit 1.15.1 is now performing validation on PUT, PATCH and DELETE methods as well. This latter hardening is only needed to protect users who have put in some sort of ?_method= override feature themselves in their handle hook, so that the request that resolve sees could be PUT/PATCH/DELETE when the browser issues a POST request.

Attack profile

How easy it is to exploit

Attack vector
Network
Complexity
Low
Privileges needed
None
User interaction
Required

What an attacker can affect

Confidentiality
High
Integrity
High
Availability
High

Exploit likelihood

0.56%Up 0.5 points since Apr 5, 2023
90%50%10%1%

What each source reports

CVE List Score used 8.8

SvelteKit has Insufficient Cross-Site Request Forgery Protection

SvelteKit is a web development framework. The SvelteKit framework offers developers an option to create simple REST APIs. This is done by defining a +server.js file, containing endpoint handlers for different HTTP methods.

SvelteKit provides out-of-the-box cross-site request forgery (CSRF) protection to its users. While the implementation does a sufficient job in mitigating common CSRF attacks, prior to version 1.15.1, the protection can be bypassed by simply specifying a different Content-Type header value.

If abused, this issue will allow malicious requests to be submitted from third-party domains, which can allow execution of operations within the context of the victim's session, and in extreme scenarios can lead to unauthorized access to users’ accounts.

SvelteKit 1.15.1 updates the is_form_content_type function call in the CSRF protection logic to include text/plain. As additional hardening of the CSRF protection mechanism against potential method overrides, SvelteKit 1.15.1 is now performing validation on PUT, PATCH and DELETE methods as well. This latter hardening is only needed to protect users who have put in some sort of ?_method= override feature themselves in their handle hook, so that the request that resolve sees could be PUT/PATCH/DELETE when the browser issues a POST request.

Record
CVE-2023-29003
CVSS 3.1
8.8 HighCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Weakness
CWE-352, CWE-184
Updated
2026-11-02
EUVDEUVD-2023-1208 8.8

SvelteKit is a web development framework. The SvelteKit framework offers developers an option to create simple REST APIs. This is done by defining a +server.js file, containing endpoint handlers for different HTTP methods.

SvelteKit provides out-of-the-box cross-site request forgery (CSRF) protection to its users. While the implementation does a sufficient job in mitigating common CSRF attacks, prior to version 1.15.1, the protection can be bypassed by simply specifying a different Content-Type header value.

If abused, this issue will allow malicious requests to be submitted from third-party domains, which can allow execution of operations within the context of the victim's session, and in extreme scenarios can lead to unauthorized access to users’ accounts.

SvelteKit 1.15.1 updates the is_form_content_type function call in the CSRF protection logic to include text/plain. As additional hardening of the CSRF protection mechanism against potential method overrides, SvelteKit 1.15.1 is now performing validation on PUT, PATCH and DELETE methods as well. This latter hardening is only needed to protect users who have put in some sort of ?_method= override feature themselves in their handle hook, so that the request that resolve sees could be PUT/PATCH/DELETE when the browser issues a POST request.

Record
EUVD-2023-1208
CVSS 3.1
8.8 HighCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Updated
2026-11-03
GitHub AdvisoriesGHSA-5p75-vc5g-8rv2 8.8

SvelteKit vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery

Summary

The SvelteKit framework offers developers an option to create simple REST APIs. This is done by defining a +server.js file, containing endpoint handlers for different HTTP methods.

SvelteKit provides out-of-the-box cross-site request forgery (CSRF) protection to it’s users. The protection is implemented at kit/src/runtime/server/respond.js#L52. While the implementation does a sufficient job in mitigating common CSRF attacks, the protection can be bypassed by simply specifying a different Content-Type header value.

Details

The CSRF protection is implemented using the code shown below.

const forbidden =
  // (1)
  request.method === 'POST' &&
  // (2)
  request.headers.get('origin') !== url.origin &&
  // (3)
  is_form_content_type(request);

if (forbidden) {
  // (4)
  const csrf_error = error(403, `Cross-site ${request.method} form submissions are forbidden`);
  if (request.headers.get('accept') === 'application/json') {
    return json(csrf_error.body, { status: csrf_error.status });
  }
  return text(csrf_error.body.message, { status: csrf_error.status });
}

If the incoming request specifies a POST method (1), the protection will compare the server’s origin with the value of the HTTP Origin header (2). A mismatch between these values signals that a potential attack has been detected. The final check is performed on the request’s Content-Type header (3) whether the value is either application/x-www-form-urlencoded or multipart/form-data (kit/src/utils/http.js#L71). If all the previous checks pass, the request will be rejected with an 403 error response (4).

The is_form_content_type validation is not sufficient to mitigate all possible variations of this type of attack. If a CSRF attack is performed with the Content-Type header set to text/plain, the protection will be circumvented and the request will be processed by the endpoint handler.

<!-- ### PoC To reproduce this issue, create and run a simple server (by default running on `localhost:3000`) with a POST endpoint handler such as: ```js export async function POST({ request }) { const data = await request.json(); console.log(JSON.stringify(data)); return new Response(String('success')); } ``` Next, save the malicious HTML page: ```html <!DOCTYPE html> <html> <head></head> <body> <h1 id="name"></h1> <form action="http://localhost:3000/api/test" method="POST" enctype="text/plain"> <input type="hidden" name="&#123;&quot;name&quot;&#58;&quot;test" value="&quot;&#44;&quot;age&quot;&#58;123&#125;" /> <input type="submit" value="Submit" /> </form> </body> </html> ``` in a file named `index.html`. Run another web server, using Python’s built in http.server module (`python -m http.server`, by default running on `localhost:8000`), navigate to [http://localhost:8000/index.html](http://localhost:8000/index.html) and click the `Submit` button. Verify that the browser’s URL has changed to `localhost:3000` and that the text `success` is displayed on the screen. Additionally, inspect the console of the SvelteKit web server and verify that the request body (`{"name":"test=","age":123}`) was parsed as valid JSON and printed out. It's worth noting that this attack is possible only for JSON request bodies. Form data sent using `text/plain` will be rejected by the server. -->

Impact

If abused, this issue will allow malicious requests to be submitted from third-party domains, which can allow execution of operations within the context of the victim's session, and in extreme scenarios can lead to unauthorized access to users’ accounts.

Remediation

SvelteKit 1.15.1 updates the is_form_content_type function call in the CSRF protection logic to include text/plain.

As additional hardening of the CSRF protection mechanism against potential method overrides, SvelteKit 1.15.1 is now performing validation on PUT, PATCH and DELETE methods as well. This latter hardening is only needed to…

Record
GHSA-5p75-vc5g-8rv2
CVSS 3.1
8.8 HighCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Weakness
CWE-184, CWE-352
Updated
2026-11-02
NVD 8.8

SvelteKit is a web development framework. The SvelteKit framework offers developers an option to create simple REST APIs. This is done by defining a +server.js file, containing endpoint handlers for different HTTP methods.

SvelteKit provides out-of-the-box cross-site request forgery (CSRF) protection to its users. While the implementation does a sufficient job in mitigating common CSRF attacks, prior to version 1.15.1, the protection can be bypassed by simply specifying a different Content-Type header value.

If abused, this issue will allow malicious requests to be submitted from third-party domains, which can allow execution of operations within the context of the victim's session, and in extreme scenarios can lead to unauthorized access to users’ accounts.

SvelteKit 1.15.1 updates the is_form_content_type function call in the CSRF protection logic to include text/plain. As additional hardening of the CSRF protection mechanism against potential method overrides, SvelteKit 1.15.1 is now performing validation on PUT, PATCH and DELETE methods as well. This latter hardening is only needed to protect users who have put in some sort of ?_method= override feature themselves in their handle hook, so that the request that resolve sees could be PUT/PATCH/DELETE when the browser issues a POST request.

Record
CVE-2023-29003
CVSS 3.1
8.8 HighCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Weakness
CWE-184, CWE-352
Updated
2026-11-02
OSV 8.8

SvelteKit has Insufficient Cross-Site Request Forgery Protection

SvelteKit is a web development framework. The SvelteKit framework offers developers an option to create simple REST APIs. This is done by defining a +server.js file, containing endpoint handlers for different HTTP methods.

SvelteKit provides out-of-the-box cross-site request forgery (CSRF) protection to its users. While the implementation does a sufficient job in mitigating common CSRF attacks, prior to version 1.15.1, the protection can be bypassed by simply specifying a different Content-Type header value.

If abused, this issue will allow malicious requests to be submitted from third-party domains, which can allow execution of operations within the context of the victim's session, and in extreme scenarios can lead to unauthorized access to users’ accounts.

SvelteKit 1.15.1 updates the is_form_content_type function call in the CSRF protection logic to include text/plain. As additional hardening of the CSRF protection mechanism against potential method overrides, SvelteKit 1.15.1 is now performing validation on PUT, PATCH and DELETE methods as well. This latter hardening is only needed to protect users who have put in some sort of ?_method= override feature themselves in their handle hook, so that the request that resolve sees could be PUT/PATCH/DELETE when the browser issues a POST request.

Record
CVE-2023-29003
CVSS 3.1
8.8 HighCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Weakness
CWE-184, CWE-352
Updated
2026-11-02
OSVGHSA-5p75-vc5g-8rv2 8.8

SvelteKit vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery

Summary

The SvelteKit framework offers developers an option to create simple REST APIs. This is done by defining a +server.js file, containing endpoint handlers for different HTTP methods.

SvelteKit provides out-of-the-box cross-site request forgery (CSRF) protection to it’s users. The protection is implemented at kit/src/runtime/server/respond.js#L52. While the implementation does a sufficient job in mitigating common CSRF attacks, the protection can be bypassed by simply specifying a different Content-Type header value.

Details

The CSRF protection is implemented using the code shown below.

const forbidden =
  // (1)
  request.method === 'POST' &&
  // (2)
  request.headers.get('origin') !== url.origin &&
  // (3)
  is_form_content_type(request);

if (forbidden) {
  // (4)
  const csrf_error = error(403, `Cross-site ${request.method} form submissions are forbidden`);
  if (request.headers.get('accept') === 'application/json') {
    return json(csrf_error.body, { status: csrf_error.status });
  }
  return text(csrf_error.body.message, { status: csrf_error.status });
}

If the incoming request specifies a POST method (1), the protection will compare the server’s origin with the value of the HTTP Origin header (2). A mismatch between these values signals that a potential attack has been detected. The final check is performed on the request’s Content-Type header (3) whether the value is either application/x-www-form-urlencoded or multipart/form-data (kit/src/utils/http.js#L71). If all the previous checks pass, the request will be rejected with an 403 error response (4).

The is_form_content_type validation is not sufficient to mitigate all possible variations of this type of attack. If a CSRF attack is performed with the Content-Type header set to text/plain, the protection will be circumvented and the request will be processed by the endpoint handler.

<!-- ### PoC To reproduce this issue, create and run a simple server (by default running on `localhost:3000`) with a POST endpoint handler such as: ```js export async function POST({ request }) { const data = await request.json(); console.log(JSON.stringify(data)); return new Response(String('success')); } ``` Next, save the malicious HTML page: ```html <!DOCTYPE html> <html> <head></head> <body> <h1 id="name"></h1> <form action="http://localhost:3000/api/test" method="POST" enctype="text/plain"> <input type="hidden" name="&#123;&quot;name&quot;&#58;&quot;test" value="&quot;&#44;&quot;age&quot;&#58;123&#125;" /> <input type="submit" value="Submit" /> </form> </body> </html> ``` in a file named `index.html`. Run another web server, using Python’s built in http.server module (`python -m http.server`, by default running on `localhost:8000`), navigate to [http://localhost:8000/index.html](http://localhost:8000/index.html) and click the `Submit` button. Verify that the browser’s URL has changed to `localhost:3000` and that the text `success` is displayed on the screen. Additionally, inspect the console of the SvelteKit web server and verify that the request body (`{"name":"test=","age":123}`) was parsed as valid JSON and printed out. It's worth noting that this attack is possible only for JSON request bodies. Form data sent using `text/plain` will be rejected by the server. -->

Impact

If abused, this issue will allow malicious requests to be submitted from third-party domains, which can allow execution of operations within the context of the victim's session, and in extreme scenarios can lead to unauthorized access to users’ accounts.

Remediation

SvelteKit 1.15.1 updates the is_form_content_type function call in the CSRF protection logic to include text/plain.

As additional hardening of the CSRF protection mechanism against potential method overrides, SvelteKit 1.15.1 is now performing validation on PUT, PATCH and DELETE methods as well. This latter hardening is only needed to…

Record
GHSA-5p75-vc5g-8rv2
CVSS 3.1
8.8 HighCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Weakness
CWE-184, CWE-352
Updated
2026-11-02

Affected products

Affected packages

Affected packages
PackageAffectedFixed
@sveltejs/kit
npm
before 1.15.1
1.15.1

History

History
RecordedChangedSources
aliases, publishedEUVD
first indexedCVE List, GitHub Advisories, NVD, OSV

Dates are when Every CVE recorded each change. Upstream dates may differ.

In short

CVE-2023-29003 is a high vulnerability (CVSS 8.8) in Svelte Sveltekit, published April 4, 2023. No source lists public exploit code. EPSS puts the chance of exploitation in the next 30 days at 0.56%, the 46th percentile. Fixed in @sveltejs/kit 1.15.1.

References

This page doesn't list everything

Left out here: the rest of 2 source descriptions. The JSON record has them.

MoveEnter Open