CVE-2024-28250
Cilium has possible unencrypted traffic between nodes when using WireGuard and L7 policies
Cilium is a networking, observability, and security solution with an eBPF-based dataplane. Starting in version 1.14.0 and prior to versions 1.14.8 and 1.15.2, In Cilium clusters with WireGuard enabled and traffic matching Layer 7 policies Wireguard-eligible traffic that is sent between a node's Envoy proxy and pods on other nodes is sent unencrypted and Wireguard-eligible traffic that is sent between a node's DNS proxy and pods on other nodes is sent unencrypted. This issue has been resolved in Cilium 1.14.8 and 1.15.2 in in native routing mode (routingMode=native) and in Cilium 1.14.4 in tunneling mode (routingMode=tunnel). Not that in tunneling mode, encryption.wireguard.encapsulate must be set to true. There is no known workaround for this issue.
Attack profile
How easy it is to exploit
- Attack vector
- Adjacent network
- Complexity
- High
- Privileges needed
- None
- User interaction
- None
What an attacker can affect
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- None
Exploit likelihood
What each source reports
CVE List Score used
6.1
Cilium has possible unencrypted traffic between nodes when using WireGuard and L7 policies
Cilium is a networking, observability, and security solution with an eBPF-based dataplane. Starting in version 1.14.0 and prior to versions 1.14.8 and 1.15.2, In Cilium clusters with WireGuard enabled and traffic matching Layer 7 policies Wireguard-eligible traffic that is sent between a node's Envoy proxy and pods on other nodes is sent unencrypted and Wireguard-eligible traffic that is sent between a node's DNS proxy and pods on other nodes is sent unencrypted. This issue has been resolved in Cilium 1.14.8 and 1.15.2 in in native routing mode (routingMode=native) and in Cilium 1.14.4 in tunneling mode (routingMode=tunnel). Not that in tunneling mode, encryption.wireguard.encapsulate must be set to true. There is no known workaround for this issue.
- Record
CVE-2024-28250- CVSS 3.1
- 6.1 Medium
CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N - Weakness
- CWE-311
- Updated
- 2026-11-02
EUVDEUVD-2024-1011
6.1
Cilium is a networking, observability, and security solution with an eBPF-based dataplane. Starting in version 1.14.0 and prior to versions 1.14.8 and 1.15.2, In Cilium clusters with WireGuard enabled and traffic matching Layer 7 policies Wireguard-eligible traffic that is sent between a node's Envoy proxy and pods on other nodes is sent unencrypted and Wireguard-eligible traffic that is sent between a node's DNS proxy and pods on other nodes is sent unencrypted. This issue has been resolved in Cilium 1.14.8 and 1.15.2 in in native routing mode (routingMode=native) and in Cilium 1.14.4 in tunneling mode (routingMode=tunnel). Not that in tunneling mode, encryption.wireguard.encapsulate must be set to true. There is no known workaround for this issue.
- Record
EUVD-2024-1011- CVSS 3.1
- 6.1 Medium
CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N - Updated
- 2026-11-03
GitHub AdvisoriesGHSA-v6q2-4qr3-5cw6
6.1
Unencrypted traffic between nodes when using WireGuard and L7 policies
Impact
In Cilium clusters with WireGuard enabled and traffic matching Layer 7 policies:
- Traffic that should be WireGuard-encrypted is sent unencrypted between a node's Envoy proxy and pods on other nodes.
- Traffic that should be WireGuard-encrypted is sent unencrypted between a node's DNS proxy and pods on other nodes.
Patches
This issue affects:
- In native routing mode (
routingMode=native):- Cilium v1.14 versions before v1.14.8
- Cilium v1.15 versions before v1.15.2
- In tunneling mode (
routingMode=tunnel):- Cilium v1.14 versions before v1.14.4
- Cilium v1.14.4 if
encryption.wireguard.encapsulateis set tofalse(default).
This issue has been resolved in:
- In native routing mode (
routingMode=native):- Cilium v1.14.8
- Cilium v1.15.2
- In tunneling mode (
routingMode=tunnel):- Cilium v1.14.4. NOTE
encryption.wireguard.encapsulatemust be set totrue.
- Cilium v1.14.4. NOTE
Workarounds
There is no workaround to this issue.
Acknowledgements
The Cilium community has worked together with members of Isovalent to prepare these mitigations. Special thanks to @brb, @giorio94, @gandro and @jschwinger233 for their work on triaging and remediating this issue.
For more information
If you have any questions or comments about this advisory, please reach out on Slack.
If you think you found a related vulnerability, we strongly encourage you to report security vulnerabilities to our private security mailing list at [email protected]. This is a private mailing list where only members of the Cilium internal security team are subscribed to, and your report will be treated as top priority.
- Record
GHSA-v6q2-4qr3-5cw6- CVSS 3.1
- 6.1 Medium
CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N - Weakness
- CWE-311, CWE-319
- Updated
- 2026-11-02
NVD
6.1
Cilium is a networking, observability, and security solution with an eBPF-based dataplane. Starting in version 1.14.0 and prior to versions 1.14.8 and 1.15.2, In Cilium clusters with WireGuard enabled and traffic matching Layer 7 policies Wireguard-eligible traffic that is sent between a node's Envoy proxy and pods on other nodes is sent unencrypted and Wireguard-eligible traffic that is sent between a node's DNS proxy and pods on other nodes is sent unencrypted. This issue has been resolved in Cilium 1.14.8 and 1.15.2 in in native routing mode (routingMode=native) and in Cilium 1.14.4 in tunneling mode (routingMode=tunnel). Not that in tunneling mode, encryption.wireguard.encapsulate must be set to true. There is no known workaround for this issue.
- Record
CVE-2024-28250- CVSS 3.1
- 6.1 Medium
CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N - Weakness
- CWE-311, CWE-319
- Updated
- 2026-11-02
OSV
6.1
Cilium has possible unencrypted traffic between nodes when using WireGuard and L7 policies
Cilium is a networking, observability, and security solution with an eBPF-based dataplane. Starting in version 1.14.0 and prior to versions 1.14.8 and 1.15.2, In Cilium clusters with WireGuard enabled and traffic matching Layer 7 policies Wireguard-eligible traffic that is sent between a node's Envoy proxy and pods on other nodes is sent unencrypted and Wireguard-eligible traffic that is sent between a node's DNS proxy and pods on other nodes is sent unencrypted. This issue has been resolved in Cilium 1.14.8 and 1.15.2 in in native routing mode (routingMode=native) and in Cilium 1.14.4 in tunneling mode (routingMode=tunnel). Not that in tunneling mode, encryption.wireguard.encapsulate must be set to true. There is no known workaround for this issue.
- Record
CVE-2024-28250- CVSS 3.1
- 6.1 Medium
CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N - Weakness
- CWE-311
- Updated
- 2026-11-02
OSVGHSA-v6q2-4qr3-5cw6
6.1
Unencrypted traffic between nodes when using WireGuard and L7 policies
Impact
In Cilium clusters with WireGuard enabled and traffic matching Layer 7 policies:
- Traffic that should be WireGuard-encrypted is sent unencrypted between a node's Envoy proxy and pods on other nodes.
- Traffic that should be WireGuard-encrypted is sent unencrypted between a node's DNS proxy and pods on other nodes.
Patches
This issue affects:
- In native routing mode (
routingMode=native):- Cilium v1.14 versions before v1.14.8
- Cilium v1.15 versions before v1.15.2
- In tunneling mode (
routingMode=tunnel):- Cilium v1.14 versions before v1.14.4
- Cilium v1.14.4 if
encryption.wireguard.encapsulateis set tofalse(default).
This issue has been resolved in:
- In native routing mode (
routingMode=native):- Cilium v1.14.8
- Cilium v1.15.2
- In tunneling mode (
routingMode=tunnel):- Cilium v1.14.4. NOTE
encryption.wireguard.encapsulatemust be set totrue.
- Cilium v1.14.4. NOTE
Workarounds
There is no workaround to this issue.
Acknowledgements
The Cilium community has worked together with members of Isovalent to prepare these mitigations. Special thanks to @brb, @giorio94, @gandro and @jschwinger233 for their work on triaging and remediating this issue.
For more information
If you have any questions or comments about this advisory, please reach out on Slack.
If you think you found a related vulnerability, we strongly encourage you to report security vulnerabilities to our private security mailing list at [email protected]. This is a private mailing list where only members of the Cilium internal security team are subscribed to, and your report will be treated as top priority.
- Record
GHSA-v6q2-4qr3-5cw6- CVSS 3.1
- 6.1 Medium
CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N - Weakness
- CWE-311, CWE-319
- Updated
- 2026-11-02
Show 8 moreShow less
OSVBIT-cilium-2024-28250 No score
Cilium is a networking, observability, and security solution with an eBPF-based dataplane. Starting in version 1.14.0 and prior to versions 1.14.8 and 1.15.2, In Cilium clusters with WireGuard enabled and traffic matching Layer 7 policies Wireguard-eligible traffic that is sent between a node's Envoy proxy and pods on other nodes is sent unencrypted and Wireguard-eligible traffic that is sent between a node's DNS proxy and pods on other nodes is sent unencrypted. This issue has been resolved in Cilium 1.14.8 and 1.15.2 in in native routing mode (routingMode=native) and in Cilium 1.14.4 in tunneling mode (routingMode=tunnel). Not that in tunneling mode, encryption.wireguard.encapsulate must be set to true. There is no known workaround for this issue.
- Record
BIT-cilium-2024-28250- Updated
- 2026-11-02
OSVBIT-cilium-operator-2024-28250 No score
Cilium is a networking, observability, and security solution with an eBPF-based dataplane. Starting in version 1.14.0 and prior to versions 1.14.8 and 1.15.2, In Cilium clusters with WireGuard enabled and traffic matching Layer 7 policies Wireguard-eligible traffic that is sent between a node's Envoy proxy and pods on other nodes is sent unencrypted and Wireguard-eligible traffic that is sent between a node's DNS proxy and pods on other nodes is sent unencrypted. This issue has been resolved in Cilium 1.14.8 and 1.15.2 in in native routing mode (routingMode=native) and in Cilium 1.14.4 in tunneling mode (routingMode=tunnel). Not that in tunneling mode, encryption.wireguard.encapsulate must be set to true. There is no known workaround for this issue.
- Record
BIT-cilium-operator-2024-28250- Updated
- 2026-11-02
OSVBIT-cilium-proxy-2024-28250 No score
Cilium is a networking, observability, and security solution with an eBPF-based dataplane. Starting in version 1.14.0 and prior to versions 1.14.8 and 1.15.2, In Cilium clusters with WireGuard enabled and traffic matching Layer 7 policies Wireguard-eligible traffic that is sent between a node's Envoy proxy and pods on other nodes is sent unencrypted and Wireguard-eligible traffic that is sent between a node's DNS proxy and pods on other nodes is sent unencrypted. This issue has been resolved in Cilium 1.14.8 and 1.15.2 in in native routing mode (routingMode=native) and in Cilium 1.14.4 in tunneling mode (routingMode=tunnel). Not that in tunneling mode, encryption.wireguard.encapsulate must be set to true. There is no known workaround for this issue.
- Record
BIT-cilium-proxy-2024-28250- Updated
- 2026-11-02
OSVBIT-hubble-2024-28250 No score
Cilium is a networking, observability, and security solution with an eBPF-based dataplane. Starting in version 1.14.0 and prior to versions 1.14.8 and 1.15.2, In Cilium clusters with WireGuard enabled and traffic matching Layer 7 policies Wireguard-eligible traffic that is sent between a node's Envoy proxy and pods on other nodes is sent unencrypted and Wireguard-eligible traffic that is sent between a node's DNS proxy and pods on other nodes is sent unencrypted. This issue has been resolved in Cilium 1.14.8 and 1.15.2 in in native routing mode (routingMode=native) and in Cilium 1.14.4 in tunneling mode (routingMode=tunnel). Not that in tunneling mode, encryption.wireguard.encapsulate must be set to true. There is no known workaround for this issue.
- Record
BIT-hubble-2024-28250- Updated
- 2026-11-02
OSVBIT-hubble-relay-2024-28250 No score
Cilium is a networking, observability, and security solution with an eBPF-based dataplane. Starting in version 1.14.0 and prior to versions 1.14.8 and 1.15.2, In Cilium clusters with WireGuard enabled and traffic matching Layer 7 policies Wireguard-eligible traffic that is sent between a node's Envoy proxy and pods on other nodes is sent unencrypted and Wireguard-eligible traffic that is sent between a node's DNS proxy and pods on other nodes is sent unencrypted. This issue has been resolved in Cilium 1.14.8 and 1.15.2 in in native routing mode (routingMode=native) and in Cilium 1.14.4 in tunneling mode (routingMode=tunnel). Not that in tunneling mode, encryption.wireguard.encapsulate must be set to true. There is no known workaround for this issue.
- Record
BIT-hubble-relay-2024-28250- Updated
- 2026-11-02
OSVBIT-hubble-ui-2024-28250 No score
Cilium is a networking, observability, and security solution with an eBPF-based dataplane. Starting in version 1.14.0 and prior to versions 1.14.8 and 1.15.2, In Cilium clusters with WireGuard enabled and traffic matching Layer 7 policies Wireguard-eligible traffic that is sent between a node's Envoy proxy and pods on other nodes is sent unencrypted and Wireguard-eligible traffic that is sent between a node's DNS proxy and pods on other nodes is sent unencrypted. This issue has been resolved in Cilium 1.14.8 and 1.15.2 in in native routing mode (routingMode=native) and in Cilium 1.14.4 in tunneling mode (routingMode=tunnel). Not that in tunneling mode, encryption.wireguard.encapsulate must be set to true. There is no known workaround for this issue.
- Record
BIT-hubble-ui-2024-28250- Updated
- 2026-11-02
OSVBIT-hubble-ui-backend-2024-28250 No score
Cilium is a networking, observability, and security solution with an eBPF-based dataplane. Starting in version 1.14.0 and prior to versions 1.14.8 and 1.15.2, In Cilium clusters with WireGuard enabled and traffic matching Layer 7 policies Wireguard-eligible traffic that is sent between a node's Envoy proxy and pods on other nodes is sent unencrypted and Wireguard-eligible traffic that is sent between a node's DNS proxy and pods on other nodes is sent unencrypted. This issue has been resolved in Cilium 1.14.8 and 1.15.2 in in native routing mode (routingMode=native) and in Cilium 1.14.4 in tunneling mode (routingMode=tunnel). Not that in tunneling mode, encryption.wireguard.encapsulate must be set to true. There is no known workaround for this issue.
- Record
BIT-hubble-ui-backend-2024-28250- Updated
- 2026-11-02
OSVGO-2024-2657 No score
Unencrypted traffic between nodes with WireGuard in github.com/cilium/cilium
In Cilium clusters with WireGuard enabled and traffic matching Layer 7 policies: traffic that should be WireGuard-encrypted is sent unencrypted between a node's Envoy proxy and pods on other nodes, and traffic that should be WireGuard-encrypted is sent unencrypted between a node's DNS proxy and pods on other nodes.
- Record
GO-2024-2657- Updated
- 2026-11-02
Affected products
Affected packages
| Package | Affected | Fixed |
|---|---|---|
github.com/cilium/ciliumGo |
1.14.0 up to 1.14.8 | 1.14.8 |
github.com/cilium/ciliumGo |
1.15.0 up to 1.15.2 | 1.15.2 |
ciliumBitnami |
1.14.0 up to 1.14.8, 1.15.0 up to 1.15.2 | 1.14.81.15.2 |
cilium-operatorBitnami |
1.14.0 up to 1.14.8, 1.15.0 up to 1.15.2 | 1.14.81.15.2 |
cilium-proxyBitnami |
1.14.0 up to 1.14.8, 1.15.0 up to 1.15.2 | 1.14.81.15.2 |
hubbleBitnami |
1.14.0 up to 1.14.8, 1.15.0 up to 1.15.2 | 1.14.81.15.2 |
hubble-relayBitnami |
1.14.0 up to 1.14.8, 1.15.0 up to 1.15.2 | 1.14.81.15.2 |
hubble-uiBitnami |
1.14.0 up to 1.14.8, 1.15.0 up to 1.15.2 | 1.14.81.15.2 |
hubble-ui-backendBitnami |
1.14.0 up to 1.14.8, 1.15.0 up to 1.15.2 | 1.14.81.15.2 |
github.com/cilium/ciliumGo |
1.14.0 up to 1.14.8, 1.15.0 up to 1.15.2 | 1.14.81.15.2 |
History
| Recorded | Changed | Sources |
|---|---|---|
| aliases | EUVD | |
| first indexed | CVE List, GitHub Advisories, NVD, OSV |
Dates are when Every CVE recorded each change. Upstream dates may differ.
In short
CVE-2024-28250 is a medium vulnerability (CVSS 6.1) in Cilium, published March 18, 2024. No source lists public exploit code. EPSS puts the chance of exploitation in the next 30 days at 0.17%, the 6th percentile. Fixed in github.com/cilium/cilium 1.14.8.
References
github.com/cilium/cilium/security/advisories/GHSA-v6q2-4qr3-5cw6
github.com/cilium/cilium/releases/tag/v1.13.13
github.com/cilium/cilium/releases/tag/v1.14.8
github.com/cilium/cilium/releases/tag/v1.15.2
nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-28250
github.com/advisories/GHSA-v6q2-4qr3-5cw6
github.com/CVEProject/cvelistV5/tree/main/cves/2024/28xxx/CVE-2024-28250.json
github.com/cilium/cilium