Every CVE Search/ Get API key

CVE-2024-29903

Cosign vulnerable to machine-wide denial of service via malicious artifacts

4.2 MediumFix available

Cosign provides code signing and transparency for containers and binaries. Prior to version 2.2.4, maliciously-crafted software artifacts can cause denial of service of the machine running Cosign thereby impacting all services on the machine. The root cause is that Cosign creates slices based on the number of signatures, manifests or attestations in untrusted artifacts. As such, the untrusted artifact can control the amount of memory that Cosign allocates. The exact issue is Cosign allocates excessive memory on the lines that creates a slice of the same length as the manifests. Version 2.2.4 contains a patch for the vulnerability.

Attack profile

How easy it is to exploit

Attack vector
Network
Complexity
High
Privileges needed
High
User interaction
Required

What an attacker can affect

Confidentiality
None
Integrity
None
Availability
High

Exploit likelihood

0.85%Up 0.8 points since Apr 11, 2024
90%50%10%1%

What each source reports

CVE List Score used 4.2

Cosign vulnerable to machine-wide denial of service via malicious artifacts

Cosign provides code signing and transparency for containers and binaries. Prior to version 2.2.4, maliciously-crafted software artifacts can cause denial of service of the machine running Cosign thereby impacting all services on the machine. The root cause is that Cosign creates slices based on the number of signatures, manifests or attestations in untrusted artifacts. As such, the untrusted artifact can control the amount of memory that Cosign allocates. The exact issue is Cosign allocates excessive memory on the lines that creates a slice of the same length as the manifests. Version 2.2.4 contains a patch for the vulnerability.

Record
CVE-2024-29903
CVSS 3.1
4.2 MediumCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Weakness
CWE-770
Updated
2026-11-02
EUVDEUVD-2024-1167 4.2

Cosign provides code signing and transparency for containers and binaries. Prior to version 2.2.4, maliciously-crafted software artifacts can cause denial of service of the machine running Cosign thereby impacting all services on the machine. The root cause is that Cosign creates slices based on the number of signatures, manifests or attestations in untrusted artifacts. As such, the untrusted artifact can control the amount of memory that Cosign allocates. The exact issue is Cosign allocates excessive memory on the lines that creates a slice of the same length as the manifests. Version 2.2.4 contains a patch for the vulnerability.

Record
EUVD-2024-1167
CVSS 3.1
4.2 MediumCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Updated
2026-11-03
GitHub AdvisoriesGHSA-95pr-fxf5-86gv 4.2

Cosign malicious artifacts can cause machine-wide DoS

Maliciously-crafted software artifacts can cause denial of service of the machine running Cosign, thereby impacting all services on the machine. The root cause is that Cosign creates slices based on the number of signatures, manifests or attestations in untrusted artifacts. As such, the untrusted artifact can control the amount of memory that Cosign allocates.

As an example, these lines demonstrate the problem:

https://github.com/sigstore/cosign/blob/286a98a4a99c1b2f32f84b0d560e324100312280/pkg/oci/remote/signatures.go#L56-L70

This Get() method gets the manifest of the image, allocates a slice equal to the length of the layers in the manifest, loops through the layers and adds a new signature to the slice.

The exact issue is Cosign allocates excessive memory on the lines that creates a slice of the same length as the manifests.

Remediation

Update to the latest version of Cosign, where the number of attestations, signatures and manifests has been limited to a reasonable value.

Cosign PoC

In the case of this API (also referenced above):

https://github.com/sigstore/cosign/blob/286a98a4a99c1b2f32f84b0d560e324100312280/pkg/oci/remote/signatures.go#L56-L70

… The first line can contain a length that is safe for the system and will not throw a runtime panic or be blocked by other safety mechanisms. For the sake of argument, let’s say that the length of m, err := s.Manifest() is the max allowed (by the machine without throwing OOM panics) manifests minus 1. When Cosign then allocates a new slice on this line: signatures := make([]oci.Signature, 0, len(m.Layers)), Cosign will allocate more memory than is available and the machine will be denied of service, causing Cosign and all other services on the machine to be unavailable.

To illustrate the issue here, we run a modified version of TestSignedImageIndex() in pkg/oci/remote:

https://github.com/sigstore/cosign/blob/14795db16417579fac0c00c11e166868d7976b61/pkg/oci/remote/index_test.go#L31-L57

Here, wantLayers is the number of manifests from these lines:

https://github.com/sigstore/cosign/blob/286a98a4a99c1b2f32f84b0d560e324100312280/pkg/oci/remote/signatures.go#L56-L60

To test this, we want to make wantLayers high enough to not cause a memory on its own but still trigger the machine-wide OOM when a slice gets create with the same length. On my local machine, it would take hours to create a slice of layers that fulfils that criteria, so instead I modify the Cosign production code to reflect a long list of manifests:

// Get implements oci.Signatures
func (s *sigs) Get() ([]oci.Signature, error) {
        m, err := s.Manifest()
        if err != nil {
                return nil, err
        }
        // Here we imitate a long list of manifests
        ms := make([]byte, 2600000000) // imitate a long list of manifests
        signatures := make([]oci.Signature, 0, len(ms))
        panic("Done")
        //signatures := make([]oci.Signature, 0, len(m.Layers))
        for _, desc := range m.Layers {

With this modified code, if we can cause an OOM without triggering the panic("Done"), we have succeeded.

Record
GHSA-95pr-fxf5-86gv
CVSS 3.1
4.2 MediumCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Weakness
CWE-770
Updated
2026-11-02
NVD 4.2

Cosign provides code signing and transparency for containers and binaries. Prior to version 2.2.4, maliciously-crafted software artifacts can cause denial of service of the machine running Cosign thereby impacting all services on the machine. The root cause is that Cosign creates slices based on the number of signatures, manifests or attestations in untrusted artifacts. As such, the untrusted artifact can control the amount of memory that Cosign allocates. The exact issue is Cosign allocates excessive memory on the lines that creates a slice of the same length as the manifests. Version 2.2.4 contains a patch for the vulnerability.

Record
CVE-2024-29903
CVSS 3.1
4.2 MediumCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
CVSS 3.1
7.5 HighCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Weakness
CWE-770
Updated
2026-11-02
OSV 4.2

Cosign vulnerable to machine-wide denial of service via malicious artifacts

Cosign provides code signing and transparency for containers and binaries. Prior to version 2.2.4, maliciously-crafted software artifacts can cause denial of service of the machine running Cosign thereby impacting all services on the machine. The root cause is that Cosign creates slices based on the number of signatures, manifests or attestations in untrusted artifacts. As such, the untrusted artifact can control the amount of memory that Cosign allocates. The exact issue is Cosign allocates excessive memory on the lines that creates a slice of the same length as the manifests. Version 2.2.4 contains a patch for the vulnerability.

Record
CVE-2024-29903
CVSS 3.1
4.2 MediumCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Weakness
CWE-770
Updated
2026-11-02
OSVGHSA-95pr-fxf5-86gv 4.2

Cosign malicious artifacts can cause machine-wide DoS

Maliciously-crafted software artifacts can cause denial of service of the machine running Cosign, thereby impacting all services on the machine. The root cause is that Cosign creates slices based on the number of signatures, manifests or attestations in untrusted artifacts. As such, the untrusted artifact can control the amount of memory that Cosign allocates.

As an example, these lines demonstrate the problem:

https://github.com/sigstore/cosign/blob/286a98a4a99c1b2f32f84b0d560e324100312280/pkg/oci/remote/signatures.go#L56-L70

This Get() method gets the manifest of the image, allocates a slice equal to the length of the layers in the manifest, loops through the layers and adds a new signature to the slice.

The exact issue is Cosign allocates excessive memory on the lines that creates a slice of the same length as the manifests.

Remediation

Update to the latest version of Cosign, where the number of attestations, signatures and manifests has been limited to a reasonable value.

Cosign PoC

In the case of this API (also referenced above):

https://github.com/sigstore/cosign/blob/286a98a4a99c1b2f32f84b0d560e324100312280/pkg/oci/remote/signatures.go#L56-L70

… The first line can contain a length that is safe for the system and will not throw a runtime panic or be blocked by other safety mechanisms. For the sake of argument, let’s say that the length of m, err := s.Manifest() is the max allowed (by the machine without throwing OOM panics) manifests minus 1. When Cosign then allocates a new slice on this line: signatures := make([]oci.Signature, 0, len(m.Layers)), Cosign will allocate more memory than is available and the machine will be denied of service, causing Cosign and all other services on the machine to be unavailable.

To illustrate the issue here, we run a modified version of TestSignedImageIndex() in pkg/oci/remote:

https://github.com/sigstore/cosign/blob/14795db16417579fac0c00c11e166868d7976b61/pkg/oci/remote/index_test.go#L31-L57

Here, wantLayers is the number of manifests from these lines:

https://github.com/sigstore/cosign/blob/286a98a4a99c1b2f32f84b0d560e324100312280/pkg/oci/remote/signatures.go#L56-L60

To test this, we want to make wantLayers high enough to not cause a memory on its own but still trigger the machine-wide OOM when a slice gets create with the same length. On my local machine, it would take hours to create a slice of layers that fulfils that criteria, so instead I modify the Cosign production code to reflect a long list of manifests:

// Get implements oci.Signatures
func (s *sigs) Get() ([]oci.Signature, error) {
        m, err := s.Manifest()
        if err != nil {
                return nil, err
        }
        // Here we imitate a long list of manifests
        ms := make([]byte, 2600000000) // imitate a long list of manifests
        signatures := make([]oci.Signature, 0, len(ms))
        panic("Done")
        //signatures := make([]oci.Signature, 0, len(m.Layers))
        for _, desc := range m.Layers {

With this modified code, if we can cause an OOM without triggering the panic("Done"), we have succeeded.

Record
GHSA-95pr-fxf5-86gv
CVSS 3.1
4.2 MediumCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Weakness
CWE-770
Updated
2026-11-02
Show 6 moreShow less
OSVRHEA-2024:4022 7.5

Red Hat Enhancement Advisory: Red Hat OpenShift Pipelines Client tkn for 1.15.0 release

Record
RHEA-2024:4022
CVSS 3.1
7.5 HighCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Updated
2026-11-02
OSVBIT-cosign-2024-29903 No score

Cosign vulnerable to machine-wide denial of service via malicious artifacts

Cosign provides code signing and transparency for containers and binaries. Prior to version 2.2.4, maliciously-crafted software artifacts can cause denial of service of the machine running Cosign thereby impacting all services on the machine. The root cause is that Cosign creates slices based on the number of signatures, manifests or attestations in untrusted artifacts. As such, the untrusted artifact can control the amount of memory that Cosign allocates. The exact issue is Cosign allocates excessive memory on the lines that creates a slice of the same length as the manifests. Version 2.2.4 contains a patch for the vulnerability.

Record
BIT-cosign-2024-29903
Updated
2026-11-02
OSVGO-2024-2719 No score

Cosign malicious artifacts can cause machine-wide DoS in github.com/sigstore/cosign

Cosign malicious artifacts can cause machine-wide DoS in github.com/sigstore/cosign

Record
GO-2024-2719
Updated
2026-11-02
OSVopenSUSE-SU-2024:13863-1 No score

cosign-2.2.4-1.1 on GA media

These are all security issues fixed in the cosign-2.2.4-1.1 package on the GA media of openSUSE Tumbleweed.

Record
openSUSE-SU-2024:13863-1
Updated
2026-11-02
OSVSUSE-SU-2024:1486-1 No score

Security update for cosign

This update for cosign fixes the following issues:

  • CVE-2024-29902: Fixed denial of service on host machine via remote image with a malicious attachments (bsc#1222835)
  • CVE-2024-29903: Fixed denial of service on host machine via malicious software artifacts (bsc#1222837)

Other fixes:

  • Updated to 2.2.4 (jsc#SLE-23879)
    • Fixes for GHSA-88jx-383q-w4qc and GHSA-95pr-fxf5-86gv (#3661)
    • ErrNoSignaturesFound should be used when there is no signature attached to an image. (#3526)
    • fix semgrep issues for dgryski.semgrep-go ruleset (#3541)
    • Honor creation timestamp for signatures again (#3549)
    • Features
      • Adds Support for Fulcio Client Credentials Flow, and Argument to Set Flow Explicitly (#3578)
Record
SUSE-SU-2024:1486-1
Updated
2026-11-02
OSVSUSE-SU-2024:1486-2 No score

Security update for cosign

This update for cosign fixes the following issues:

  • CVE-2024-29902: Fixed denial of service on host machine via remote image with a malicious attachments (bsc#1222835)
  • CVE-2024-29903: Fixed denial of service on host machine via malicious software artifacts (bsc#1222837)

Other fixes:

  • Updated to 2.2.4 (jsc#SLE-23879)
    • Fixes for GHSA-88jx-383q-w4qc and GHSA-95pr-fxf5-86gv (#3661)
    • ErrNoSignaturesFound should be used when there is no signature attached to an image. (#3526)
    • fix semgrep issues for dgryski.semgrep-go ruleset (#3541)
    • Honor creation timestamp for signatures again (#3549)
    • Features
      • Adds Support for Fulcio Client Credentials Flow, and Argument to Set Flow Explicitly (#3578)
Record
SUSE-SU-2024:1486-2
Updated
2026-11-02

Affected products

Affected packages

Affected packages
PackageAffectedFixed
github.com/sigstore/cosign
Go
through 2.2.3 None known
github.com/sigstore/cosign/v2
Go
through 2.2.3
2.2.4
cosign
Bitnami
before 2.2.4
2.2.4
github.com/sigstore/cosign/v2
Go
before 2.2.4
2.2.4
github.com/sigstore/cosign
Go
All versions None known
openshift-pipelines-client
Red Hat:openshift_pipelines:1.15::el8
before 0:1.15.0-11496.el8
0:1.15.0-11496.el8
openshift-pipelines-client-redistributable
Red Hat:openshift_pipelines:1.15::el8
before 0:1.15.0-11496.el8
0:1.15.0-11496.el8
cosign
SUSE:Linux Enterprise Module for Basesystem 15 SP5
before 2.2.4-150400.3.20.1
2.2.4-150400.3.20.1
cosign
openSUSE:Leap 15.5
before 2.2.4-150400.3.20.1
2.2.4-150400.3.20.1
cosign
SUSE:Linux Enterprise Module for Basesystem 15 SP6
before 2.2.4-150400.3.20.1
2.2.4-150400.3.20.1
cosign
openSUSE:Leap 15.6
before 2.2.4-150400.3.20.1
2.2.4-150400.3.20.1
cosign
openSUSE:Tumbleweed
before 2.2.4-1.1
2.2.4-1.1

History

History
RecordedChangedSources
aliases, publishedEUVD
first indexedCVE List, GitHub Advisories, NVD, OSV

Dates are when Every CVE recorded each change. Upstream dates may differ.

In short

CVE-2024-29903 is a medium vulnerability (CVSS 4.2) in Sigstore Cosign, published April 10, 2024. No source lists public exploit code. EPSS puts the chance of exploitation in the next 30 days at 0.85%, the 58th percentile. Fixed in github.com/sigstore/cosign/v2 2.2.4.

References

Show 38 moreShow less
MoveEnter Open