Every CVE Search/ Get API key

CVE-2024-31205

Saleor CSRF bypass in refreshToken mutation

4.2 Medium

Saleor is an e-commerce platform. Starting in version 3.10.0 and prior to versions 3.14.64, 3.15.39, 3.16.39, 3.17.35, 3.18.31, and 3.19.19, an attacker may bypass cross-set request forgery (CSRF) validation when calling refresh token mutation with empty string. When a user provides an empty string in refreshToken mutation, while the token persists in JWT_REFRESH_TOKEN_COOKIE_NAME cookie, application omits validation against CSRF token and returns valid access token. Versions 3.14.64, 3.15.39, 3.16.39, 3.17.35, 3.18.31, and 3.19.19 contain a patch for the issue. As a workaround, one may replace saleor.graphql.account.mutations.authentication.refresh_token.py.get_refresh_token. This will fix the issue, but be aware, that it returns JWT_MISSING_TOKEN instead of JWT_INVALID_TOKEN.

Attack profile

How easy it is to exploit

Attack vector
Network
Complexity
High
Privileges needed
None
User interaction
Required

What an attacker can affect

Confidentiality
Low
Integrity
Low
Availability
None

Exploit likelihood

0.19%Up 0.1 points since Apr 9, 2024
90%50%10%1%

What each source reports

CVE List Score used 4.2

Saleor CSRF bypass in refreshToken mutation

Saleor is an e-commerce platform. Starting in version 3.10.0 and prior to versions 3.14.64, 3.15.39, 3.16.39, 3.17.35, 3.18.31, and 3.19.19, an attacker may bypass cross-set request forgery (CSRF) validation when calling refresh token mutation with empty string. When a user provides an empty string in refreshToken mutation, while the token persists in JWT_REFRESH_TOKEN_COOKIE_NAME cookie, application omits validation against CSRF token and returns valid access token. Versions 3.14.64, 3.15.39, 3.16.39, 3.17.35, 3.18.31, and 3.19.19 contain a patch for the issue. As a workaround, one may replace saleor.graphql.account.mutations.authentication.refresh_token.py.get_refresh_token. This will fix the issue, but be aware, that it returns JWT_MISSING_TOKEN instead of JWT_INVALID_TOKEN.

Record
CVE-2024-31205
CVSS 3.1
4.2 MediumCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
Weakness
CWE-352
Updated
2026-11-02
EUVDEUVD-2024-29109 4.2

Saleor is an e-commerce platform. Starting in version 3.10.0 and prior to versions 3.14.64, 3.15.39, 3.16.39, 3.17.35, 3.18.31, and 3.19.19, an attacker may bypass cross-set request forgery (CSRF) validation when calling refresh token mutation with empty string. When a user provides an empty string in refreshToken mutation, while the token persists in JWT_REFRESH_TOKEN_COOKIE_NAME cookie, application omits validation against CSRF token and returns valid access token. Versions 3.14.64, 3.15.39, 3.16.39, 3.17.35, 3.18.31, and 3.19.19 contain a patch for the issue. As a workaround, one may replace saleor.graphql.account.mutations.authentication.refresh_token.py.get_refresh_token. This will fix the issue, but be aware, that it returns JWT_MISSING_TOKEN instead of JWT_INVALID_TOKEN.

Record
EUVD-2024-29109
CVSS 3.1
4.2 MediumCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
Updated
2026-11-03
NVD 4.2

Saleor is an e-commerce platform. Starting in version 3.10.0 and prior to versions 3.14.64, 3.15.39, 3.16.39, 3.17.35, 3.18.31, and 3.19.19, an attacker may bypass cross-set request forgery (CSRF) validation when calling refresh token mutation with empty string. When a user provides an empty string in refreshToken mutation, while the token persists in JWT_REFRESH_TOKEN_COOKIE_NAME cookie, application omits validation against CSRF token and returns valid access token. Versions 3.14.64, 3.15.39, 3.16.39, 3.17.35, 3.18.31, and 3.19.19 contain a patch for the issue. As a workaround, one may replace saleor.graphql.account.mutations.authentication.refresh_token.py.get_refresh_token. This will fix the issue, but be aware, that it returns JWT_MISSING_TOKEN instead of JWT_INVALID_TOKEN.

Record
CVE-2024-31205
CVSS 3.1
4.2 MediumCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
CVSS 3.1
5.4 MediumCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
Weakness
CWE-352
Updated
2026-11-02
OSV 4.2

Saleor CSRF bypass in refreshToken mutation

Saleor is an e-commerce platform. Starting in version 3.10.0 and prior to versions 3.14.64, 3.15.39, 3.16.39, 3.17.35, 3.18.31, and 3.19.19, an attacker may bypass cross-set request forgery (CSRF) validation when calling refresh token mutation with empty string. When a user provides an empty string in refreshToken mutation, while the token persists in JWT_REFRESH_TOKEN_COOKIE_NAME cookie, application omits validation against CSRF token and returns valid access token. Versions 3.14.64, 3.15.39, 3.16.39, 3.17.35, 3.18.31, and 3.19.19 contain a patch for the issue. As a workaround, one may replace saleor.graphql.account.mutations.authentication.refresh_token.py.get_refresh_token. This will fix the issue, but be aware, that it returns JWT_MISSING_TOKEN instead of JWT_INVALID_TOKEN.

Record
CVE-2024-31205
CVSS 3.1
4.2 MediumCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
Weakness
CWE-352
Updated
2026-11-02

Affected products

History

History
RecordedChangedSources
aliases, publishedEUVD
first indexedCVE List, NVD, OSV

Dates are when Every CVE recorded each change. Upstream dates may differ.

In short

CVE-2024-31205 is a medium vulnerability (CVSS 4.2) in Saleor, published April 8, 2024. No source lists public exploit code. EPSS puts the chance of exploitation in the next 30 days at 0.19%, the 9th percentile. No source names a fixed version.

References

MoveEnter Open