Every CVE Search/ Get API key

CVE-2024-32017

Buffer overflows in RIOT

9.8 Critical

RIOT is a real-time multi-threading operating system that supports a range of devices that are typically 8-bit, 16-bit and 32-bit microcontrollers. The size check in the gcoap_dns_server_proxy_get() function contains a small typo that may lead to a buffer overflow in the subsequent strcpy(). In detail, the length of the _uri string is checked instead of the length of the _proxy string. The _gcoap_forward_proxy_copy_options() function does not implement an explicit size check before copying data to the cep->req_etag buffer that is COAP_ETAG_LENGTH_MAX bytes long. If an attacker can craft input so that optlen becomes larger than COAP_ETAG_LENGTH_MAX, they can cause a buffer overflow. If the input above is attacker-controlled and crosses a security boundary, the impact of the buffer overflow vulnerabilities could range from denial of service to arbitrary code execution. This issue has yet to be patched. Users are advised to add manual bounds checking.

Attack profile

How easy it is to exploit

Attack vector
Network
Complexity
Low
Privileges needed
None
User interaction
None

What an attacker can affect

Confidentiality
High
Integrity
High
Availability
High

Exploit likelihood

1.55%Up 1.5 points since May 1, 2024
90%50%10%1%

What each source reports

CVE List Score used 9.8

Buffer overflows in RIOT

RIOT is a real-time multi-threading operating system that supports a range of devices that are typically 8-bit, 16-bit and 32-bit microcontrollers. The size check in the gcoap_dns_server_proxy_get() function contains a small typo that may lead to a buffer overflow in the subsequent strcpy(). In detail, the length of the _uri string is checked instead of the length of the _proxy string. The _gcoap_forward_proxy_copy_options() function does not implement an explicit size check before copying data to the cep->req_etag buffer that is COAP_ETAG_LENGTH_MAX bytes long. If an attacker can craft input so that optlen becomes larger than COAP_ETAG_LENGTH_MAX, they can cause a buffer overflow. If the input above is attacker-controlled and crosses a security boundary, the impact of the buffer overflow vulnerabilities could range from denial of service to arbitrary code execution. This issue has yet to be patched. Users are advised to add manual bounds checking.

Record
CVE-2024-32017
CVSS 3.1
9.8 CriticalCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Weakness
CWE-120
Updated
2026-11-02
EUVDEUVD-2024-29855 9.8

RIOT is a real-time multi-threading operating system that supports a range of devices that are typically 8-bit, 16-bit and 32-bit microcontrollers. The size check in the gcoap_dns_server_proxy_get() function contains a small typo that may lead to a buffer overflow in the subsequent strcpy(). In detail, the length of the _uri string is checked instead of the length of the _proxy string. The _gcoap_forward_proxy_copy_options() function does not implement an explicit size check before copying data to the cep->req_etag buffer that is COAP_ETAG_LENGTH_MAX bytes long. If an attacker can craft input so that optlen becomes larger than COAP_ETAG_LENGTH_MAX, they can cause a buffer overflow. If the input above is attacker-controlled and crosses a security boundary, the impact of the buffer overflow vulnerabilities could range from denial of service to arbitrary code execution. This issue has yet to be patched. Users are advised to add manual bounds checking.

Record
EUVD-2024-29855
CVSS 3.1
9.8 CriticalCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Updated
2026-11-02
NVD 9.8

RIOT is a real-time multi-threading operating system that supports a range of devices that are typically 8-bit, 16-bit and 32-bit microcontrollers. The size check in the gcoap_dns_server_proxy_get() function contains a small typo that may lead to a buffer overflow in the subsequent strcpy(). In detail, the length of the _uri string is checked instead of the length of the _proxy string. The _gcoap_forward_proxy_copy_options() function does not implement an explicit size check before copying data to the cep->req_etag buffer that is COAP_ETAG_LENGTH_MAX bytes long. If an attacker can craft input so that optlen becomes larger than COAP_ETAG_LENGTH_MAX, they can cause a buffer overflow. If the input above is attacker-controlled and crosses a security boundary, the impact of the buffer overflow vulnerabilities could range from denial of service to arbitrary code execution. This issue has yet to be patched. Users are advised to add manual bounds checking.

Record
CVE-2024-32017
CVSS 3.1
9.8 CriticalCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
CVSS 3.1
9.0 CriticalCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
Weakness
CWE-120
Updated
2026-11-02
OSV 9.8

Buffer overflows in RIOT

RIOT is a real-time multi-threading operating system that supports a range of devices that are typically 8-bit, 16-bit and 32-bit microcontrollers. The size check in the gcoap_dns_server_proxy_get() function contains a small typo that may lead to a buffer overflow in the subsequent strcpy(). In detail, the length of the _uri string is checked instead of the length of the _proxy string. The _gcoap_forward_proxy_copy_options() function does not implement an explicit size check before copying data to the cep->req_etag buffer that is COAP_ETAG_LENGTH_MAX bytes long. If an attacker can craft input so that optlen becomes larger than COAP_ETAG_LENGTH_MAX, they can cause a buffer overflow. If the input above is attacker-controlled and crosses a security boundary, the impact of the buffer overflow vulnerabilities could range from denial of service to arbitrary code execution. This issue has yet to be patched. Users are advised to add manual bounds checking.

Record
CVE-2024-32017
CVSS 3.1
9.8 CriticalCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Weakness
CWE-120
Updated
2026-11-07

Affected products

History

History
RecordedChangedSources
factsOSV
first indexedCVE List, EUVD, NVD, OSV

Dates are when Every CVE recorded each change. Upstream dates may differ.

In short

CVE-2024-32017 is a critical vulnerability (CVSS 9.8) in Riot-os Riot, published May 1, 2024. No source lists public exploit code. EPSS puts the chance of exploitation in the next 30 days at 1.55%, the 75th percentile. No source names a fixed version.

References

MoveEnter Open