Every CVE Search/ Get API key

CVE-2024-52581

Litestar allows unbounded resource consumption (DoS vulnerability)

8.2 HighFix available

Litestar is an Asynchronous Server Gateway Interface (ASGI) framework. Prior to version 2.13.0, the multipart form parser shipped with litestar expects the entire request body as a single byte string and there is no default limit for the total size of the request body. This allows an attacker to upload arbitrary large files wrapped in a multipart/form-data request and cause excessive memory consumption on the server. The multipart form parser in affected versions is vulnerable to this type of attack by design. The public method signature as well as its implementation both expect the entire request body to be available as a single byte string. It is not possible to accept large file uploads in a safe way using this parser. This may be a regression, as a variation of this issue was already reported in CVE-2023-25578. Limiting the part number is not sufficient to prevent out-of-memory errors on the server. A patch is available in version 2.13.0.

Attack profile

How easy it is to exploit

Attack vector
Network
Complexity
Low
Privileges needed
None
User interaction
None

What an attacker can affect

Confidentiality
None
Integrity
None
Availability
High

Exploit likelihood

0.79%Up 0.7 points since Nov 21, 2024
90%50%10%1%

What each source reports

CVE List Score used 8.2

Litestar allows unbounded resource consumption (DoS vulnerability)

Litestar is an Asynchronous Server Gateway Interface (ASGI) framework. Prior to version 2.13.0, the multipart form parser shipped with litestar expects the entire request body as a single byte string and there is no default limit for the total size of the request body. This allows an attacker to upload arbitrary large files wrapped in a multipart/form-data request and cause excessive memory consumption on the server. The multipart form parser in affected versions is vulnerable to this type of attack by design. The public method signature as well as its implementation both expect the entire request body to be available as a single byte string. It is not possible to accept large file uploads in a safe way using this parser. This may be a regression, as a variation of this issue was already reported in CVE-2023-25578. Limiting the part number is not sufficient to prevent out-of-memory errors on the server. A patch is available in version 2.13.0.

Record
CVE-2024-52581
CVSS 4.0
8.2 HighCVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:L
Weakness
CWE-770
Updated
2026-11-02
EUVDEUVD-2024-0214 8.2

Litestar is an Asynchronous Server Gateway Interface (ASGI) framework. Prior to version 2.13.0, the multipart form parser shipped with litestar expects the entire request body as a single byte string and there is no default limit for the total size of the request body. This allows an attacker to upload arbitrary large files wrapped in a multipart/form-data request and cause excessive memory consumption on the server. The multipart form parser in affected versions is vulnerable to this type of attack by design. The public method signature as well as its implementation both expect the entire request body to be available as a single byte string. It is not possible to accept large file uploads in a safe way using this parser. This may be a regression, as a variation of this issue was already reported in CVE-2023-25578. Limiting the part number is not sufficient to prevent out-of-memory errors on the server. A patch is available in version 2.13.0.

Record
EUVD-2024-0214
CVSS 4.0
8.2 HighCVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:L
Updated
2026-11-03
GitHub AdvisoriesGHSA-gjcc-jvgw-wvwj 8.2

Litestar allows unbounded resource consumption (DoS vulnerability)

Summary

Litestar offers multiple methods to return a parsed representation of the request body, as well as extractors that rely on those parsers to map request content to structured data types. Multiple of those parsers do not have size limits when reading the request body into memory, which allows an attacker to cause excessive memory consumption on the server by sending large requests.

Details

The Request methods to parse json, msgpack or form-data all read the entire request stream into memory via await self.body() without a prior size check or size limit. There may be other places (e.g. extractors) where this can happen.

For most formats, a configurable size limit would be sufficient to mitigate this issue. The total request size can also be limited by a proxy (e.g. nginx) in front of the actual application as a workaround. However, for applications that actually want to accept large file uploads via multipart/form-data, a simple size limit would not be practical. The multipart parser currently used by Litestar expects a single byte string as input and does not support incremental parsing via Request.stream(). Applications could bypass the Litestar parser and use a streaming parser to read from Request.stream() instead, but that would not work with extractors and other features of the framework. Switching the parser for a different implementation is currently not possible via public APIs.

PoC

Start an applications that accesses Request.json(), Request.msgpack() or Request.form() or uses an extractor that relies on those parsers internally, and send a large request with a matching content type. The actual content of the request does not matter. For example: curl -F "foo=</dev/random" http://127.0.0.1:8000/) for multipart/form-data. Server memory consumption will increase very quickly until memory (and swap) are exhausted.

Impact

This is a denial of service (DoS) vulnerability affecting all Litestar applications that process json, msgpack or form-data submission requests.

Record
GHSA-gjcc-jvgw-wvwj
CVSS 4.0
8.2 HighCVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:L
CVSS 3.1
7.5 HighCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Weakness
CWE-770
Updated
2026-11-02
NVD 8.2

Litestar is an Asynchronous Server Gateway Interface (ASGI) framework. Prior to version 2.13.0, the multipart form parser shipped with litestar expects the entire request body as a single byte string and there is no default limit for the total size of the request body. This allows an attacker to upload arbitrary large files wrapped in a multipart/form-data request and cause excessive memory consumption on the server. The multipart form parser in affected versions is vulnerable to this type of attack by design. The public method signature as well as its implementation both expect the entire request body to be available as a single byte string. It is not possible to accept large file uploads in a safe way using this parser. This may be a regression, as a variation of this issue was already reported in CVE-2023-25578. Limiting the part number is not sufficient to prevent out-of-memory errors on the server. A patch is available in version 2.13.0.

Record
CVE-2024-52581
CVSS 4.0
8.2 HighCVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:L/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
CVSS 3.1
7.5 HighCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Weakness
CWE-770
Updated
2026-11-02
OSV 8.2

Litestar allows unbounded resource consumption (DoS vulnerability)

Litestar is an Asynchronous Server Gateway Interface (ASGI) framework. Prior to version 2.13.0, the multipart form parser shipped with litestar expects the entire request body as a single byte string and there is no default limit for the total size of the request body. This allows an attacker to upload arbitrary large files wrapped in a multipart/form-data request and cause excessive memory consumption on the server. The multipart form parser in affected versions is vulnerable to this type of attack by design. The public method signature as well as its implementation both expect the entire request body to be available as a single byte string. It is not possible to accept large file uploads in a safe way using this parser. This may be a regression, as a variation of this issue was already reported in CVE-2023-25578. Limiting the part number is not sufficient to prevent out-of-memory errors on the server. A patch is available in version 2.13.0.

Record
CVE-2024-52581
CVSS 4.0
8.2 HighCVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:L
Weakness
CWE-770
Updated
2026-11-02
OSVGHSA-gjcc-jvgw-wvwj 8.2

Litestar allows unbounded resource consumption (DoS vulnerability)

Summary

Litestar offers multiple methods to return a parsed representation of the request body, as well as extractors that rely on those parsers to map request content to structured data types. Multiple of those parsers do not have size limits when reading the request body into memory, which allows an attacker to cause excessive memory consumption on the server by sending large requests.

Details

The Request methods to parse json, msgpack or form-data all read the entire request stream into memory via await self.body() without a prior size check or size limit. There may be other places (e.g. extractors) where this can happen.

For most formats, a configurable size limit would be sufficient to mitigate this issue. The total request size can also be limited by a proxy (e.g. nginx) in front of the actual application as a workaround. However, for applications that actually want to accept large file uploads via multipart/form-data, a simple size limit would not be practical. The multipart parser currently used by Litestar expects a single byte string as input and does not support incremental parsing via Request.stream(). Applications could bypass the Litestar parser and use a streaming parser to read from Request.stream() instead, but that would not work with extractors and other features of the framework. Switching the parser for a different implementation is currently not possible via public APIs.

PoC

Start an applications that accesses Request.json(), Request.msgpack() or Request.form() or uses an extractor that relies on those parsers internally, and send a large request with a matching content type. The actual content of the request does not matter. For example: curl -F "foo=</dev/random" http://127.0.0.1:8000/) for multipart/form-data. Server memory consumption will increase very quickly until memory (and swap) are exhausted.

Impact

This is a denial of service (DoS) vulnerability affecting all Litestar applications that process json, msgpack or form-data submission requests.

Record
GHSA-gjcc-jvgw-wvwj
CVSS 4.0
8.2 HighCVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:L
CVSS 3.1
7.5 HighCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Weakness
CWE-770
Updated
2026-11-02
OSVPYSEC-2024-178 7.5

Litestar is an Asynchronous Server Gateway Interface (ASGI) framework. Prior to version 2.13.0, the multipart form parser shipped with litestar expects the entire request body as a single byte string and there is no default limit for the total size of the request body. This allows an attacker to upload arbitrary large files wrapped in a multipart/form-data request and cause excessive memory consumption on the server. The multipart form parser in affected versions is vulnerable to this type of attack by design. The public method signature as well as its implementation both expect the entire request body to be available as a single byte string. It is not possible to accept large file uploads in a safe way using this parser. This may be a regression, as a variation of this issue was already reported in CVE-2023-25578. Limiting the part number is not sufficient to prevent out-of-memory errors on the server. A patch is available in version 2.13.0.

Record
PYSEC-2024-178
CVSS 3.1
7.5 HighCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Updated
2026-11-02
OSVPYSEC-2026-1944 8.2

Litestar allows unbounded resource consumption (DoS vulnerability)

Summary

Litestar offers multiple methods to return a parsed representation of the request body, as well as extractors that rely on those parsers to map request content to structured data types. Multiple of those parsers do not have size limits when reading the request body into memory, which allows an attacker to cause excessive memory consumption on the server by sending large requests.

Details

The Request methods to parse json, msgpack or form-data all read the entire request stream into memory via await self.body() without a prior size check or size limit. There may be other places (e.g. extractors) where this can happen.

For most formats, a configurable size limit would be sufficient to mitigate this issue. The total request size can also be limited by a proxy (e.g. nginx) in front of the actual application as a workaround. However, for applications that actually want to accept large file uploads via multipart/form-data, a simple size limit would not be practical. The multipart parser currently used by Litestar expects a single byte string as input and does not support incremental parsing via Request.stream(). Applications could bypass the Litestar parser and use a streaming parser to read from Request.stream() instead, but that would not work with extractors and other features of the framework. Switching the parser for a different implementation is currently not possible via public APIs.

PoC

Start an applications that accesses Request.json(), Request.msgpack() or Request.form() or uses an extractor that relies on those parsers internally, and send a large request with a matching content type. The actual content of the request does not matter. For example: curl -F "foo=</dev/random" http://127.0.0.1:8000/) for multipart/form-data. Server memory consumption will increase very quickly until memory (and swap) are exhausted.

Impact

This is a denial of service (DoS) vulnerability affecting all Litestar applications that process json, msgpack or form-data submission requests.

Record
PYSEC-2026-1944
CVSS 4.0
8.2 HighCVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:L
CVSS 3.1
7.5 HighCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Updated
2026-11-02

Affected products

Affected packages

Affected packages
PackageAffectedFixed
litestar
PyPI
through 2.12.1
2.13.0
starlite
PyPI
through 1.51.16 None known
litestar
PyPI
before 2.13.0, plus listed versions
1.0.0a02.0.02.0.0a32.0.0a42.0.0a5
Show 45 moreShow less
2.0.0a62.0.0a72.0.0b12.0.0b22.0.0b32.0.0b42.0.0rc12.0.12.1.02.1.12.10.02.11.02.12.02.12.12.2.02.2.12.3.02.3.12.3.22.4.02.4.12.4.22.4.32.4.42.4.52.5.02.5.12.5.22.5.32.5.42.5.52.6.02.6.12.6.22.6.32.6.42.7.02.7.12.7.22.8.02.8.12.8.22.8.32.9.02.9.1
2.13.0
starlite
PyPI
through 1.51.16, plus listed versions
0.0.1a00.1.00.1.0b10.1.10.1.2
Show 45 moreShow less
0.1.30.1.40.1.50.1.60.2.00.2.10.3.00.4.00.4.10.4.20.4.30.5.00.6.00.7.00.7.10.7.21.0.01.0.11.0.21.0.31.0.41.0.51.1.01.1.11.10.01.10.11.11.01.11.11.12.01.13.01.13.11.14.01.14.11.14.21.15.01.16.01.16.11.16.21.17.01.17.11.17.21.18.01.18.11.19.01.2.0
None known
litestar
PyPI
before 2.13.0, plus listed versions
1.0.0a02.0.02.0.0a32.0.0a42.0.0a5
Show 45 moreShow less
2.0.0a62.0.0a72.0.0b12.0.0b22.0.0b32.0.0b42.0.0rc12.0.12.1.02.1.12.10.02.11.02.12.02.12.12.2.02.2.12.3.02.3.12.3.22.4.02.4.12.4.22.4.32.4.42.4.52.5.02.5.12.5.22.5.32.5.42.5.52.6.02.6.12.6.22.6.32.6.42.7.02.7.12.7.22.8.02.8.12.8.22.8.32.9.02.9.1
2.13.0

History

History
RecordedChangedSources
aliases, publishedEUVD
first indexedCVE List, GitHub Advisories, NVD, OSV

Dates are when Every CVE recorded each change. Upstream dates may differ.

In short

CVE-2024-52581 is a high vulnerability (CVSS 8.2) in Litestar, published November 20, 2024. No source lists public exploit code. EPSS puts the chance of exploitation in the next 30 days at 0.79%, the 56th percentile. Fixed in litestar 2.13.0.

References

Show 4 moreShow less
This page doesn't list everything

Left out here: 263 versions. The JSON record has them.

MoveEnter Open