CVE-2025-21607
Success of Certain Precompile Calls not Checked in Vyper
Vyper is a Pythonic Smart Contract Language for the EVM. When the Vyper Compiler uses the precompiles EcRecover (0x1) and Identity (0x4), the success flag of the call is not checked. As a consequence an attacker can provide a specific amount of gas to make these calls fail but let the overall execution continue. Then the execution result can be incorrect. Based on EVM's rules, after the failed precompile the remaining code has only 1/64 of the pre-call-gas left (as 63/64 were forwarded and spent). Hence, only fairly simple executions can follow the failed precompile calls. Therefore, we found no significantly impacted real-world contracts. None the less an advisory has been made out of an abundance of caution. This issue is fixed in 0.4.1.
Attack profile
How easy it is to exploit
- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- High
- Privileges needed
- Low
- User interaction
- None
What an attacker can affect
- Confidentiality
- None
- Integrity
- Low
- Availability
- None
Exploit likelihood
What each source reports
CVE List Score used
2.3
Success of Certain Precompile Calls not Checked in Vyper
Vyper is a Pythonic Smart Contract Language for the EVM. When the Vyper Compiler uses the precompiles EcRecover (0x1) and Identity (0x4), the success flag of the call is not checked. As a consequence an attacker can provide a specific amount of gas to make these calls fail but let the overall execution continue. Then the execution result can be incorrect. Based on EVM's rules, after the failed precompile the remaining code has only 1/64 of the pre-call-gas left (as 63/64 were forwarded and spent). Hence, only fairly simple executions can follow the failed precompile calls. Therefore, we found no significantly impacted real-world contracts. None the less an advisory has been made out of an abundance of caution. This issue is fixed in 0.4.1.
- Record
CVE-2025-21607- CVSS 4.0
- 2.3 Low
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:H/AT:P/PR:L/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N - Weakness
- CWE-670
- Updated
- 2026-11-02
EUVDEUVD-2025-0067
2.3
Vyper is a Pythonic Smart Contract Language for the EVM. When the Vyper Compiler uses the precompiles EcRecover (0x1) and Identity (0x4), the success flag of the call is not checked. As a consequence an attacker can provide a specific amount of gas to make these calls fail but let the overall execution continue. Then the execution result can be incorrect. Based on EVM's rules, after the failed precompile the remaining code has only 1/64 of the pre-call-gas left (as 63/64 were forwarded and spent). Hence, only fairly simple executions can follow the failed precompile calls. Therefore, we found no significantly impacted real-world contracts. None the less an advisory has been made out of an abundance of caution. This issue is fixed in 0.4.1.
- Record
EUVD-2025-0067- CVSS 4.0
- 2.3 Low
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:H/AT:P/PR:L/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N - Updated
- 2026-11-02
GitHub AdvisoriesGHSA-vgf2-gvx8-xwc3
2.3
Vyper Does Not Check the Success of Certain Precompile Calls
Summary
When the Vyper Compiler uses the precompiles EcRecover (0x1) and Identity (0x4), the success flag of the call is not checked. As a consequence an attacker can provide a specific amount of gas to make these calls fail but let the overall execution continue. Then the execution result can be incorrect.
Based on EVM's rules, after the failed precompile the remaining code has only 1/64 of the pre-call-gas left (as 63/64 were forwarded and spent). Hence, only fairly simple executions can follow the failed precompile calls. Therefore, we found no significantly impacted real-world contracts.
The fix is tracked in https://github.com/vyperlang/vyper/pull/4451.
Details
The relevant precompiles
EcRecover
EcRecover is used in vyper's ecrecover built-in. As the precompile consumes 3000 gas, any execution after an out-of-gas EcRecover call has at most 47 gas left.
Identity
- The Identity precompile is used in vyper to perform memory copy operations. As its cost is variable, a variable amount of gas might be left after a failed call. The bigger the copy operation, the more gas can be left. Hence, a failed call to Identity could theoretically be followed by successful storage changes or emitted events.
- Identity is no longer used when
evm-versioncancunis used (becauseMCOPYis used instead). In 0.4.0cancunis default, in 0.3.10cancunis an option, otherwisecancunis not available. As only pre-cancunversions are relevant, we don't have to consider transient storage operations succeeding a failed call to Identity.
The other precompiles
- Calls to
Sha2,ecAdd, andecMulhave success checks and have had them for a long time. - The precompiles
modexp,ripe,blake,ecPairing, andPoint Evaluationhave no builtins in vyper.
PoC
In the following we provide concrete examples of incorrectly generated bytecode. These examples are not optimized, but rather Proof-of-Concepts. The list is also not exhaustive.
ecrecover use
- Affected versions: 0.2.0 - 0.4.0
- For older compiler versions (<=0.3.9) it behaves similarly to this older advisory. As no data is returned, the previous value of the memory word is returned to the user. Hence, any dirty bytes might be returned. Contracts with older compiler versions and
ecrecoverwere checked. - For new vyper versions, the output buffer is zeroed, so when the call fails zero is returned. This is an incorrect result, but developers should anyway check for 0 as a failure case. Hence, this is unlikely to result in issues. However, we did search for such cases.
- As mentioned above at most 47 gas is left after the failed call, hence a
returnis the most realistic scenario to be attacked.
Vulnerable Code:
@external
@view
def foo(hash: bytes32, v: uint256, r:uint256, s:uint256) -> address:
return ecrecover(hash, v, r, s)
Problematic Call:
print(
c.foo(
binascii.unhexlify(
"6c9c5e133b8aafb2ea74f524a5263495e7ae5701c7248805f7b511d973dc7055"
),
28,
78616903610408968922803823221221116251138855211764625814919875002740131251724,
37668412420813231458864536126575229553064045345107737433087067088194345044408,
)
) # Returns 0x9eE53ad38Bb67d745223a4257D7d48cE973FeB7A
print(
c.foo(
binascii.unhexlify(
"6c9c5e133b8aafb2ea74f524a5263495e7ae5701c7248805f7b511d973dc7055"
),
28,
78616903610408968922803823221221116251138855211764625814919875002740131251724,
37668412420813231458864536126575229553064045345107737433087067088194345044408,
gas=3000,
)
) # Returns 0x0000000000000000000000000000000000000000
Identity to copy Dynamic Arrays
- Affected versions: 0.3.2 - 0.3.9
- Dynamic Arrays might be copied on different occasions
- That copy operation can fail leading to incorrect accesses afterwards …
- Record
GHSA-vgf2-gvx8-xwc3- CVSS 4.0
- 2.3 Low
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:H/AT:P/PR:L/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N - Weakness
- CWE-670, CWE-703
- Updated
- 2026-11-02
NVD
2.3
Vyper is a Pythonic Smart Contract Language for the EVM. When the Vyper Compiler uses the precompiles EcRecover (0x1) and Identity (0x4), the success flag of the call is not checked. As a consequence an attacker can provide a specific amount of gas to make these calls fail but let the overall execution continue. Then the execution result can be incorrect. Based on EVM's rules, after the failed precompile the remaining code has only 1/64 of the pre-call-gas left (as 63/64 were forwarded and spent). Hence, only fairly simple executions can follow the failed precompile calls. Therefore, we found no significantly impacted real-world contracts. None the less an advisory has been made out of an abundance of caution. This issue is fixed in 0.4.1.
- Record
CVE-2025-21607- CVSS 4.0
- 2.3 Low
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:H/AT:P/PR:L/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X - CVSS 3.1
- 7.5 High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N - Weakness
- CWE-670
- Updated
- 2026-11-02
OSV
2.3
Success of Certain Precompile Calls not Checked in Vyper
Vyper is a Pythonic Smart Contract Language for the EVM. When the Vyper Compiler uses the precompiles EcRecover (0x1) and Identity (0x4), the success flag of the call is not checked. As a consequence an attacker can provide a specific amount of gas to make these calls fail but let the overall execution continue. Then the execution result can be incorrect. Based on EVM's rules, after the failed precompile the remaining code has only 1/64 of the pre-call-gas left (as 63/64 were forwarded and spent). Hence, only fairly simple executions can follow the failed precompile calls. Therefore, we found no significantly impacted real-world contracts. None the less an advisory has been made out of an abundance of caution. This issue is fixed in 0.4.1.
- Record
CVE-2025-21607- CVSS 4.0
- 2.3 Low
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:H/AT:P/PR:L/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N - Weakness
- CWE-670
- Updated
- 2026-11-02
OSVGHSA-vgf2-gvx8-xwc3
2.3
Vyper Does Not Check the Success of Certain Precompile Calls
Summary
When the Vyper Compiler uses the precompiles EcRecover (0x1) and Identity (0x4), the success flag of the call is not checked. As a consequence an attacker can provide a specific amount of gas to make these calls fail but let the overall execution continue. Then the execution result can be incorrect.
Based on EVM's rules, after the failed precompile the remaining code has only 1/64 of the pre-call-gas left (as 63/64 were forwarded and spent). Hence, only fairly simple executions can follow the failed precompile calls. Therefore, we found no significantly impacted real-world contracts.
The fix is tracked in https://github.com/vyperlang/vyper/pull/4451.
Details
The relevant precompiles
EcRecover
EcRecover is used in vyper's ecrecover built-in. As the precompile consumes 3000 gas, any execution after an out-of-gas EcRecover call has at most 47 gas left.
Identity
- The Identity precompile is used in vyper to perform memory copy operations. As its cost is variable, a variable amount of gas might be left after a failed call. The bigger the copy operation, the more gas can be left. Hence, a failed call to Identity could theoretically be followed by successful storage changes or emitted events.
- Identity is no longer used when
evm-versioncancunis used (becauseMCOPYis used instead). In 0.4.0cancunis default, in 0.3.10cancunis an option, otherwisecancunis not available. As only pre-cancunversions are relevant, we don't have to consider transient storage operations succeeding a failed call to Identity.
The other precompiles
- Calls to
Sha2,ecAdd, andecMulhave success checks and have had them for a long time. - The precompiles
modexp,ripe,blake,ecPairing, andPoint Evaluationhave no builtins in vyper.
PoC
In the following we provide concrete examples of incorrectly generated bytecode. These examples are not optimized, but rather Proof-of-Concepts. The list is also not exhaustive.
ecrecover use
- Affected versions: 0.2.0 - 0.4.0
- For older compiler versions (<=0.3.9) it behaves similarly to this older advisory. As no data is returned, the previous value of the memory word is returned to the user. Hence, any dirty bytes might be returned. Contracts with older compiler versions and
ecrecoverwere checked. - For new vyper versions, the output buffer is zeroed, so when the call fails zero is returned. This is an incorrect result, but developers should anyway check for 0 as a failure case. Hence, this is unlikely to result in issues. However, we did search for such cases.
- As mentioned above at most 47 gas is left after the failed call, hence a
returnis the most realistic scenario to be attacked.
Vulnerable Code:
@external
@view
def foo(hash: bytes32, v: uint256, r:uint256, s:uint256) -> address:
return ecrecover(hash, v, r, s)
Problematic Call:
print(
c.foo(
binascii.unhexlify(
"6c9c5e133b8aafb2ea74f524a5263495e7ae5701c7248805f7b511d973dc7055"
),
28,
78616903610408968922803823221221116251138855211764625814919875002740131251724,
37668412420813231458864536126575229553064045345107737433087067088194345044408,
)
) # Returns 0x9eE53ad38Bb67d745223a4257D7d48cE973FeB7A
print(
c.foo(
binascii.unhexlify(
"6c9c5e133b8aafb2ea74f524a5263495e7ae5701c7248805f7b511d973dc7055"
),
28,
78616903610408968922803823221221116251138855211764625814919875002740131251724,
37668412420813231458864536126575229553064045345107737433087067088194345044408,
gas=3000,
)
) # Returns 0x0000000000000000000000000000000000000000
Identity to copy Dynamic Arrays
- Affected versions: 0.3.2 - 0.3.9
- Dynamic Arrays might be copied on different occasions
- That copy operation can fail leading to incorrect accesses afterwards …
- Record
GHSA-vgf2-gvx8-xwc3- CVSS 4.0
- 2.3 Low
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:H/AT:P/PR:L/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N - Weakness
- CWE-670, CWE-703
- Updated
- 2026-11-02
OSVPYSEC-2025-33
7.5
Vyper is a Pythonic Smart Contract Language for the EVM. When the Vyper Compiler uses the precompiles EcRecover (0x1) and Identity (0x4), the success flag of the call is not checked. As a consequence an attacker can provide a specific amount of gas to make these calls fail but let the overall execution continue. Then the execution result can be incorrect. Based on EVM's rules, after the failed precompile the remaining code has only 1/64 of the pre-call-gas left (as 63/64 were forwarded and spent). Hence, only fairly simple executions can follow the failed precompile calls. Therefore, we found no significantly impacted real-world contracts. None the less an advisory has been made out of an abundance of caution. There are no actions for users to take.
- Record
PYSEC-2025-33- CVSS 3.1
- 7.5 High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N - Updated
- 2026-11-02
Affected products
Affected packages
| Package | Affected | Fixed |
|---|---|---|
vyperPyPI |
before 0.4.1 | 0.4.1 |
vyperPyPI |
All versions, plus listed versions 0.1.0b10.1.0b100.1.0b110.1.0b120.1.0b13 Show 45 moreShow less0.1.0b140.1.0b150.1.0b160.1.0b170.1.0b20.1.0b30.1.0b40.1.0b50.1.0b60.1.0b70.1.0b80.1.0b90.2.10.2.100.2.110.2.120.2.130.2.140.2.150.2.160.2.20.2.30.2.40.2.50.2.60.2.70.2.80.2.90.3.00.3.10.3.100.3.10rc10.3.10rc20.3.10rc30.3.10rc40.3.10rc50.3.20.3.30.3.40.3.50.3.60.3.70.3.80.3.90.4.0 |
None known |
vyperPyPI |
before 0.4.1, plus listed versions 0.1.0b10.1.0b100.1.0b110.1.0b120.1.0b13 Show 45 moreShow less0.1.0b140.1.0b150.1.0b160.1.0b170.1.0b20.1.0b30.1.0b40.1.0b50.1.0b60.1.0b70.1.0b80.1.0b90.2.10.2.100.2.110.2.120.2.130.2.140.2.150.2.160.2.20.2.30.2.40.2.50.2.60.2.70.2.80.2.90.3.00.3.10.3.100.3.10rc10.3.10rc20.3.10rc30.3.10rc40.3.10rc50.3.20.3.30.3.40.3.50.3.60.3.70.3.80.3.90.4.0 |
0.4.1 |
History
| Recorded | Changed | Sources |
|---|---|---|
| first indexed | CVE List, EUVD, GitHub Advisories, NVD, OSV |
Dates are when Every CVE recorded each change. Upstream dates may differ.
In short
CVE-2025-21607 is a low vulnerability (CVSS 2.3) in Vyperlang Vyper, published January 14, 2025. No source lists public exploit code. EPSS puts the chance of exploitation in the next 30 days at 0.67%, the 52nd percentile. Fixed in vyper 0.4.1.
References
github.com/vyperlang/vyper/security/advisories/GHSA-vgf2-gvx8-xwc3
github.com/vyperlang/vyper/pull/4451
github.com/vyperlang/vyper/commit/7136eab0a254aa2ff7ddca41cc05f2ee1fa99caf
nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2025-21607
github.com/pypa/advisory-database/tree/main/vulns/vyper/PYSEC-2025-33.yaml
github.com/advisories/GHSA-vgf2-gvx8-xwc3
github.com/CVEProject/cvelistV5/tree/main/cves/2025/21xxx/CVE-2025-21607.json
github.com/vyperlang/vyper
Left out here: 47 versions and the rest of 2 source descriptions. The JSON record has them.