CVE-2025-24884

kube-audit-rest is a simple logger of mutation/creation requests to the k8s api. If the "full-elastic-stack" example vector configuration was used for a real cluster, the previous values of kubernetes secrets would have been disclosed in the audit messages. This vulnerability is fixed in 1.0.16.

kube-audit-rest is a simple logger of mutation/creation requests to the k8s api. If the "full-elastic-stack" example vector configuration was used for a real cluster, the previous values of kubernetes secrets would have been disclosed in the audit messages. This vulnerability is fixed in 1.0.16.

Impact

What kind of vulnerability is it? Who is impacted? If the "full-elastic-stack" example vector configuration was used for a real cluster, the previous values of kubernetes secrets would have been disclosed in the audit messages.

Patches

Has the problem been patched? What versions should users upgrade to? The example has been updated to fix this in commit 9df8886b4819409f566233adc7c3b7a43a4096ba

Workarounds

Is there a way for users to fix or remediate the vulnerability without upgrading? Replace

          if .request.requestKind.kind == "Secret" {
            del(.request.object.data)
            .request.object.data.redacted = "REDACTED"
            del(.request.oldObject.data)
            .request.oldObject.data.redacted = "REDACTED"
          }

In the vector "audit-files-json-parser-and-redaction" step with

          if .request.requestKind.kind == "Secret" {
            # Redact the secret data
            del(.request.object.data)
            .request.object.data.redacted = "REDACTED"
            del(.request.oldObject.data)
            .request.oldObject.data.redacted = "REDACTED"
            # Remove the previously set secret data - Not bothering to parse it as this annotation shouldn't ever be needed
            del(.request.object.metadata.annotations.["kubectl.kubernetes.io/last-applied-configuration"])
            del(.request.oldObject.metadata.annotations.["kubectl.kubernetes.io/last-applied-configuration"])
          }

References

Are there any links users can visit to find out more?

kube-audit-rest is a simple logger of mutation/creation requests to the k8s api. If the "full-elastic-stack" example vector configuration was used for a real cluster, the previous values of kubernetes secrets would have been disclosed in the audit messages. This vulnerability is fixed in 1.0.16.

kube-audit-rest is a simple logger of mutation/creation requests to the k8s api. If the "full-elastic-stack" example vector configuration was used for a real cluster, the previous values of kubernetes secrets would have been disclosed in the audit messages. This vulnerability is fixed in 1.0.16.

Impact

What kind of vulnerability is it? Who is impacted? If the "full-elastic-stack" example vector configuration was used for a real cluster, the previous values of kubernetes secrets would have been disclosed in the audit messages.

Patches

Has the problem been patched? What versions should users upgrade to? The example has been updated to fix this in commit 9df8886b4819409f566233adc7c3b7a43a4096ba

Workarounds

Is there a way for users to fix or remediate the vulnerability without upgrading? Replace

          if .request.requestKind.kind == "Secret" {
            del(.request.object.data)
            .request.object.data.redacted = "REDACTED"
            del(.request.oldObject.data)
            .request.oldObject.data.redacted = "REDACTED"
          }

In the vector "audit-files-json-parser-and-redaction" step with

          if .request.requestKind.kind == "Secret" {
            # Redact the secret data
            del(.request.object.data)
            .request.object.data.redacted = "REDACTED"
            del(.request.oldObject.data)
            .request.oldObject.data.redacted = "REDACTED"
            # Remove the previously set secret data - Not bothering to parse it as this annotation shouldn't ever be needed
            del(.request.object.metadata.annotations.["kubectl.kubernetes.io/last-applied-configuration"])
            del(.request.oldObject.metadata.annotations.["kubectl.kubernetes.io/last-applied-configuration"])
          }

References

Are there any links users can visit to find out more?

kube-audit-rest's example logging configuration could disclose secret values in the audit log in github.com/RichardoC/kube-audit-rest

These are all security issues fixed in the govulncheck-vulndb-0.0.20250204T220613-1.1 package on the GA media of openSUSE Tumbleweed.

This update for govulncheck-vulndb fixes the following issues:

• Update to version 0.0.20250207T224745 2025-02-07T22:47:45Z. Refs jsc#PED-11136 Go CVE Numbering Authority IDs added or updated with aliases:

  • GO-2025-3456 CVE-2025-24786 GHSA-9r4c-jwx3-3j76
  • GO-2025-3457 CVE-2025-24787 GHSA-c7w4-9wv8-7x7c
  • GO-2025-3458 CVE-2025-24366 GHSA-vj7w-3m8c-6vpx

• Update to version 0.0.20250206T175003 2025-02-06T17:50:03Z. Refs jsc#PED-11136 Go CVE Numbering Authority IDs added or updated with aliases:

  • GO-2023-1867 CVE-2022-47930 GHSA-c58h-qv6g-fw74
  • GO-2024-3244 CVE-2024-50354 GHSA-cph5-3pgr-c82g

• Update to version 0.0.20250206T165438 2025-02-06T16:54:38Z. Refs jsc#PED-11136 Go CVE Numbering Authority IDs added or updated with aliases:

  • GO-2025-3428 CVE-2025-22867
  • GO-2025-3447 CVE-2025-22866

• Update to version 0.0.20250205T232745 2025-02-05T23:27:45Z. Refs jsc#PED-11136 Go CVE Numbering Authority IDs added or updated with aliases:

  • GO-2025-3408
  • GO-2025-3448 GHSA-23qp-3c2m-xx6w
  • GO-2025-3449 GHSA-mx2j-7cmv-353c
  • GO-2025-3450 GHSA-w7wm-2425-7p2h
  • GO-2025-3454 GHSA-mj4v-hp69-27x5
  • GO-2025-3455 GHSA-vqv5-385r-2hf8

• Update to version 0.0.20250205T003520 2025-02-05T00:35:20Z. Refs jsc#PED-11136 Go CVE Numbering Authority IDs added or updated with aliases:

  • GO-2025-3451

• Update to version 0.0.20250204T220613 2025-02-04T22:06:13Z. Refs jsc#PED-11136 Go CVE Numbering Authority IDs added or updated with aliases:

  • GO-2025-3431 CVE-2025-24884 GHSA-hcr5-wv4p-h2g2
  • GO-2025-3433 CVE-2025-23216 GHSA-47g2-qmh2-749v
  • GO-2025-3434 CVE-2025-24376 GHSA-fc89-jghx-8pvg
  • GO-2025-3435 CVE-2025-24784 GHSA-756x-m4mj-q96c
  • GO-2025-3436 CVE-2025-24883 GHSA-q26p-9cq4-7fc2
  • GO-2025-3437 GHSA-274v-mgcv-cm8j
  • GO-2025-3438 CVE-2024-11741 GHSA-wxcc-2f3q-4h58
  • GO-2025-3442 CVE-2025-24371 GHSA-22qq-3xwm-r5x4
  • GO-2025-3443 GHSA-r3r4-g7hq-pq4f
  • GO-2025-3444 CVE-2024-35177
  • GO-2025-3445 CVE-2024-47770

• Use standard RPM macros to unpack the source and populate a working directory. Fixes build with RPM 4.20.

• Update to version 0.0.20250130T185858 2025-01-30T18:58:58Z. Refs jsc#PED-11136 Go CVE Numbering Authority IDs added or updated with aliases:

  • GO-2024-2842 CVE-2024-3727 GHSA-6wvf-f2vw-3425
  • GO-2024-3181 CVE-2024-9313 GHSA-x5q3-c8rm-w787
  • GO-2024-3188 CVE-2024-9312 GHSA-4gfw-wf7c-w6g2
  • GO-2025-3372 CVE-2024-45339 GHSA-6wxm-mpqj-6jpf
  • GO-2025-3373 CVE-2024-45341
  • GO-2025-3383 CVE-2024-45340
  • GO-2025-3408
  • GO-2025-3412 CVE-2024-10846 GHSA-36gq-35j3-p9r9
  • GO-2025-3420 CVE-2024-45336
  • GO-2025-3421 CVE-2025-22865
  • GO-2025-3424 CVE-2025-24369
  • GO-2025-3426 CVE-2025-0750 GHSA-hp5j-2585-qx6g
  • GO-2025-3427 CVE-2024-13484 GHSA-58fx-7v9q-3g56