CVE-2025-30162
East-west traffic not subject to egress policy enforcement for requests via Gateway API load balancers
Cilium is a networking, observability, and security solution with an eBPF-based dataplane. For Cilium users who use Gateway API for Ingress for some services and use LB-IPAM or BGP for LB Service implementation and use network policies to block egress traffic from workloads in a namespace to workloads in other namespaces, egress traffic from workloads covered by such network policies to LoadBalancers configured by Gateway resources will incorrectly be allowed. LoadBalancer resources not deployed via a Gateway API configuration are not affected by this issue. This issue affects: Cilium v1.15 between v1.15.0 and v1.15.14 inclusive, v1.16 between v1.16.0 and v1.16.7 inclusive, and v1.17 between v1.17.0 and v1.17.1 inclusive. This issue is fixed in Cilium v1.15.15, v1.16.8, and v1.17.2. A Clusterwide Cilium Network Policy can be used to work around this issue for users who are unable to upgrade.
Attack profile
How easy it is to exploit
- Attack vector
- Local
- Complexity
- High
- Privileges needed
- None
- User interaction
- None
What an attacker can affect
- Confidentiality
- Low
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- None
Exploit likelihood
What each source reports
CVE List Score used
3.2
East-west traffic not subject to egress policy enforcement for requests via Gateway API load balancers
Cilium is a networking, observability, and security solution with an eBPF-based dataplane. For Cilium users who use Gateway API for Ingress for some services and use LB-IPAM or BGP for LB Service implementation and use network policies to block egress traffic from workloads in a namespace to workloads in other namespaces, egress traffic from workloads covered by such network policies to LoadBalancers configured by Gateway resources will incorrectly be allowed. LoadBalancer resources not deployed via a Gateway API configuration are not affected by this issue. This issue affects: Cilium v1.15 between v1.15.0 and v1.15.14 inclusive, v1.16 between v1.16.0 and v1.16.7 inclusive, and v1.17 between v1.17.0 and v1.17.1 inclusive. This issue is fixed in Cilium v1.15.15, v1.16.8, and v1.17.2. A Clusterwide Cilium Network Policy can be used to work around this issue for users who are unable to upgrade.
- Record
CVE-2025-30162- CVSS 3.1
- 3.2 Low
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:N/A:N - Weakness
- CWE-863
- Updated
- 2026-11-02
EUVDEUVD-2025-7997
3.2
Cilium is a networking, observability, and security solution with an eBPF-based dataplane. For Cilium users who use Gateway API for Ingress for some services and use LB-IPAM or BGP for LB Service implementation and use network policies to block egress traffic from workloads in a namespace to workloads in other namespaces, egress traffic from workloads covered by such network policies to LoadBalancers configured by Gateway resources will incorrectly be allowed. LoadBalancer resources not deployed via a Gateway API configuration are not affected by this issue. This issue affects: Cilium v1.15 between v1.15.0 and v1.15.14 inclusive, v1.16 between v1.16.0 and v1.16.7 inclusive, and v1.17 between v1.17.0 and v1.17.1 inclusive. This issue is fixed in Cilium v1.15.15, v1.16.8, and v1.17.2. A Clusterwide Cilium Network Policy can be used to work around this issue for users who are unable to upgrade.
- Record
EUVD-2025-7997- CVSS 3.1
- 3.2 Low
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:N/A:N - Updated
- 2026-11-02
GitHub AdvisoriesGHSA-24qp-4xx8-3jvj
3.2
Cilium East-west traffic not subject to egress policy enforcement for requests via Gateway API load balancers
Impact
For Cilium users who:
- Use Gateway API for Ingress for some services AND
- Use LB-IPAM or BGP for LB Service implementation AND
- Use network policies to block egress traffic from workloads in a namespace to workloads in other namespaces
Egress traffic from workloads covered by such network policies to LoadBalancers configured by Gateway resources will incorrectly be allowed.
LoadBalancer resources not deployed via a Gateway API configuration are not affected by this issue.
Patches
This issue was fixed by https://github.com/cilium/proxy/pull/1172.
This issue affects:
- Cilium v1.15 between v1.15.0 and v1.15.14 inclusive
- Cilium v1.16 between v1.16.0 and v1.16.7 inclusive
- Cilium v1.17 between v1.17.0 and v1.17.1 inclusive
This issue is fixed in:
- Cilium v1.15.15
- Cilium v1.16.8
- Cilium v1.17.2
Workarounds
A Clusterwide Cilium Network Policy can be used to work around this issue for users who are unable to upgrade. An outline of such a policy is provided below:
apiVersion: "cilium.io/v2"
kind: CiliumClusterwideNetworkPolicy
metadata:
name: "workaround"
spec:
endpointSelector:
matchExpressions:
- key: reserved:ingress
operator: Exists
ingress:
- fromEntities:
- world
- The policy opens up connectivity from all locations outside the cluster into the Cilium Ingress Gateway.
- The policy establishes a default deny for all other traffic towards the Cilium Ingress Gateway, including all in-cluster sources.
- It is possible to tailor the policy to more narrowly allow inbound traffic while creating a default deny posture for traffic between namespaces. Users should edit the policy to bring it in line with the security requirements particular to their environments.
Acknowledgements
The Cilium community has worked together with members of the Isovalent team to prepare these mitigations. Special thanks to @jrajahalme for the fix.
For more information
If you think you have found a vulnerability affecting Cilium, we strongly encourage you to report it to our security mailing list at [email protected]. This is a private mailing list for the Cilium security team, and your report will be treated as top priority.
- Record
GHSA-24qp-4xx8-3jvj- CVSS 3.1
- 3.2 Low
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:N/A:N - Weakness
- CWE-863
- Updated
- 2026-11-02
NVD
3.2
Cilium is a networking, observability, and security solution with an eBPF-based dataplane. For Cilium users who use Gateway API for Ingress for some services and use LB-IPAM or BGP for LB Service implementation and use network policies to block egress traffic from workloads in a namespace to workloads in other namespaces, egress traffic from workloads covered by such network policies to LoadBalancers configured by Gateway resources will incorrectly be allowed. LoadBalancer resources not deployed via a Gateway API configuration are not affected by this issue. This issue affects: Cilium v1.15 between v1.15.0 and v1.15.14 inclusive, v1.16 between v1.16.0 and v1.16.7 inclusive, and v1.17 between v1.17.0 and v1.17.1 inclusive. This issue is fixed in Cilium v1.15.15, v1.16.8, and v1.17.2. A Clusterwide Cilium Network Policy can be used to work around this issue for users who are unable to upgrade.
- Record
CVE-2025-30162- CVSS 3.1
- 3.2 Low
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:N/A:N - CVSS 3.1
- 4.3 Medium
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:N/A:N - Weakness
- CWE-863
- Updated
- 2026-11-02
OSV
3.2
East-west traffic not subject to egress policy enforcement for requests via Gateway API load balancers
Cilium is a networking, observability, and security solution with an eBPF-based dataplane. For Cilium users who use Gateway API for Ingress for some services and use LB-IPAM or BGP for LB Service implementation and use network policies to block egress traffic from workloads in a namespace to workloads in other namespaces, egress traffic from workloads covered by such network policies to LoadBalancers configured by Gateway resources will incorrectly be allowed. LoadBalancer resources not deployed via a Gateway API configuration are not affected by this issue. This issue affects: Cilium v1.15 between v1.15.0 and v1.15.14 inclusive, v1.16 between v1.16.0 and v1.16.7 inclusive, and v1.17 between v1.17.0 and v1.17.1 inclusive. This issue is fixed in Cilium v1.15.15, v1.16.8, and v1.17.2. A Clusterwide Cilium Network Policy can be used to work around this issue for users who are unable to upgrade.
- Record
CVE-2025-30162- CVSS 3.1
- 3.2 Low
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:N/A:N - Weakness
- CWE-863
- Updated
- 2026-11-02
OSVGHSA-24qp-4xx8-3jvj
3.2
Cilium East-west traffic not subject to egress policy enforcement for requests via Gateway API load balancers
Impact
For Cilium users who:
- Use Gateway API for Ingress for some services AND
- Use LB-IPAM or BGP for LB Service implementation AND
- Use network policies to block egress traffic from workloads in a namespace to workloads in other namespaces
Egress traffic from workloads covered by such network policies to LoadBalancers configured by Gateway resources will incorrectly be allowed.
LoadBalancer resources not deployed via a Gateway API configuration are not affected by this issue.
Patches
This issue was fixed by https://github.com/cilium/proxy/pull/1172.
This issue affects:
- Cilium v1.15 between v1.15.0 and v1.15.14 inclusive
- Cilium v1.16 between v1.16.0 and v1.16.7 inclusive
- Cilium v1.17 between v1.17.0 and v1.17.1 inclusive
This issue is fixed in:
- Cilium v1.15.15
- Cilium v1.16.8
- Cilium v1.17.2
Workarounds
A Clusterwide Cilium Network Policy can be used to work around this issue for users who are unable to upgrade. An outline of such a policy is provided below:
apiVersion: "cilium.io/v2"
kind: CiliumClusterwideNetworkPolicy
metadata:
name: "workaround"
spec:
endpointSelector:
matchExpressions:
- key: reserved:ingress
operator: Exists
ingress:
- fromEntities:
- world
- The policy opens up connectivity from all locations outside the cluster into the Cilium Ingress Gateway.
- The policy establishes a default deny for all other traffic towards the Cilium Ingress Gateway, including all in-cluster sources.
- It is possible to tailor the policy to more narrowly allow inbound traffic while creating a default deny posture for traffic between namespaces. Users should edit the policy to bring it in line with the security requirements particular to their environments.
Acknowledgements
The Cilium community has worked together with members of the Isovalent team to prepare these mitigations. Special thanks to @jrajahalme for the fix.
For more information
If you think you have found a vulnerability affecting Cilium, we strongly encourage you to report it to our security mailing list at [email protected]. This is a private mailing list for the Cilium security team, and your report will be treated as top priority.
- Record
GHSA-24qp-4xx8-3jvj- CVSS 3.1
- 3.2 Low
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:N/A:N - Weakness
- CWE-863
- Updated
- 2026-11-02
Show 5 moreShow less
OSVBIT-cilium-2025-30162 No score
East-west traffic not subject to egress policy enforcement for requests via Gateway API load balancers
Cilium is a networking, observability, and security solution with an eBPF-based dataplane. For Cilium users who use Gateway API for Ingress for some services and use LB-IPAM or BGP for LB Service implementation and use network policies to block egress traffic from workloads in a namespace to workloads in other namespaces, egress traffic from workloads covered by such network policies to LoadBalancers configured by Gateway resources will incorrectly be allowed. LoadBalancer resources not deployed via a Gateway API configuration are not affected by this issue. This issue affects: Cilium v1.15 between v1.15.0 and v1.15.14 inclusive, v1.16 between v1.16.0 and v1.16.7 inclusive, and v1.17 between v1.17.0 and v1.17.1 inclusive. This issue is fixed in Cilium v1.15.15, v1.16.8, and v1.17.2. A Clusterwide Cilium Network Policy can be used to work around this issue for users who are unable to upgrade.
- Record
BIT-cilium-2025-30162- Updated
- 2026-11-02
OSVBIT-cilium-operator-2025-30162 No score
East-west traffic not subject to egress policy enforcement for requests via Gateway API load balancers
Cilium is a networking, observability, and security solution with an eBPF-based dataplane. For Cilium users who use Gateway API for Ingress for some services and use LB-IPAM or BGP for LB Service implementation and use network policies to block egress traffic from workloads in a namespace to workloads in other namespaces, egress traffic from workloads covered by such network policies to LoadBalancers configured by Gateway resources will incorrectly be allowed. LoadBalancer resources not deployed via a Gateway API configuration are not affected by this issue. This issue affects: Cilium v1.15 between v1.15.0 and v1.15.14 inclusive, v1.16 between v1.16.0 and v1.16.7 inclusive, and v1.17 between v1.17.0 and v1.17.1 inclusive. This issue is fixed in Cilium v1.15.15, v1.16.8, and v1.17.2. A Clusterwide Cilium Network Policy can be used to work around this issue for users who are unable to upgrade.
- Record
BIT-cilium-operator-2025-30162- Updated
- 2026-11-02
OSVBIT-hubble-relay-2025-30162 No score
East-west traffic not subject to egress policy enforcement for requests via Gateway API load balancers
Cilium is a networking, observability, and security solution with an eBPF-based dataplane. For Cilium users who use Gateway API for Ingress for some services and use LB-IPAM or BGP for LB Service implementation and use network policies to block egress traffic from workloads in a namespace to workloads in other namespaces, egress traffic from workloads covered by such network policies to LoadBalancers configured by Gateway resources will incorrectly be allowed. LoadBalancer resources not deployed via a Gateway API configuration are not affected by this issue. This issue affects: Cilium v1.15 between v1.15.0 and v1.15.14 inclusive, v1.16 between v1.16.0 and v1.16.7 inclusive, and v1.17 between v1.17.0 and v1.17.1 inclusive. This issue is fixed in Cilium v1.15.15, v1.16.8, and v1.17.2. A Clusterwide Cilium Network Policy can be used to work around this issue for users who are unable to upgrade.
- Record
BIT-hubble-relay-2025-30162- Updated
- 2026-11-02
OSVGO-2025-3560 No score
Cilium East-west traffic not subject to egress policy enforcement for requests via Gateway API load balancers in github.com/cilium/cilium
Cilium East-west traffic not subject to egress policy enforcement for requests via Gateway API load balancers in github.com/cilium/cilium
- Record
GO-2025-3560- Updated
- 2026-11-02
OSVopenSUSE-SU-2025:14937-1 No score
govulncheck-vulndb-0.0.20250327T184518-1.1 on GA media
These are all security issues fixed in the govulncheck-vulndb-0.0.20250327T184518-1.1 package on the GA media of openSUSE Tumbleweed.
- Record
openSUSE-SU-2025:14937-1- Updated
- 2026-11-02
Affected products
Affected packages
| Package | Affected | Fixed |
|---|---|---|
github.com/cilium/ciliumGo |
1.16.0 up to 1.16.8 | 1.16.8 |
github.com/cilium/ciliumGo |
1.17.0 up to 1.17.2 | 1.17.2 |
github.com/cilium/ciliumGo |
1.15.0 up to 1.15.15 | 1.15.15 |
ciliumBitnami |
1.15.0 up to 1.17.2 | 1.17.2 |
cilium-operatorBitnami |
1.15.0 up to 1.17.2 | 1.17.2 |
hubble-relayBitnami |
1.15.0 up to 1.17.2 | 1.17.2 |
github.com/cilium/ciliumGo |
1.15.0 up to 1.15.15, 1.16.0 up to 1.16.8, 1.17.0 up to 1.17.2 | 1.15.151.16.81.17.2 |
govulncheck-vulndbopenSUSE:Tumbleweed From an advisory covering 30 CVEs |
before 0.0.20250327T184518-1.1 | 0.0.20250327T184518-1.1 |
History
| Recorded | Changed | Sources |
|---|---|---|
| affected, facts | ||
| first indexed | CVE List, EUVD, GitHub Advisories, NVD, OSV |
Dates are when Every CVE recorded each change. Upstream dates may differ.
In short
CVE-2025-30162 is a low vulnerability (CVSS 3.2) in Cilium, published March 24, 2025. No source lists public exploit code. EPSS puts the chance of exploitation in the next 30 days at 0.22%, the 13th percentile. Fixed in github.com/cilium/cilium 1.16.8.
References
github.com/cilium/cilium/security/advisories/GHSA-24qp-4xx8-3jvj
github.com/cilium/proxy/pull/1172
docs.cilium.io/en/stable/network/lb-ipam
nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2025-30162
github.com/advisories/GHSA-24qp-4xx8-3jvj
github.com/CVEProject/cvelistV5/tree/main/cves/2025/30xxx/CVE-2025-30162.json
Show 32 moreShow less
github.com/cilium/cilium
lists.opensuse.org/archives/list/[email protected]/thread/NEVFAGUWHTVZSJTUAIU6C4S26DP2KIGB
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2024-25132
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2024-53348
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2024-53351
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2024-7598
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2024-7631
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2024-9042
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2024-9900
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2025-1097
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2025-1098
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2025-1472
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2025-1767
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2025-1974
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2025-24513
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2025-24514
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2025-24920
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2025-25068
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2025-25274
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2025-27612
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2025-27715
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2025-27933
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2025-29778
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2025-29914
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2025-29922
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2025-29923
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2025-30077
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2025-30153
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2025-30162
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2025-30163
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2025-30179
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2025-30204