CVE-2025-47774
Vyper's `slice()` may elide side-effects when output length is 0
Vyper is the Pythonic Programming Language for the Ethereum Virtual Machine. In versions up to and including 0.4.2rc1, the slice() builtin can elide side effects when the output length is 0, and the source bytestring is a builtin (msg.data or <address>.code). The reason is that for these source locations, the check that length >= 1 is skipped. The result is that a 0-length bytestring constructed with slice can be passed to make_byte_array_copier, which elides evaluation of its source argument when the max length is 0. The impact is that side effects in the start argument may be elided when the length argument is 0, e.g. slice(msg.data, self.do_side_effect(), 0). The fix in pull request 4645 disallows any invocation of slice() with length 0, including for the ad hoc locations discussed in this advisory. The fix is expected to be part of version 0.4.2.
Attack profile
How easy it is to exploit
- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges needed
- None
- User interaction
- None
What an attacker can affect
- Confidentiality
- None
- Integrity
- Low
- Availability
- None
Exploit likelihood
What each source reports
CVE List Score used
2.9
Vyper's `slice()` may elide side-effects when output length is 0
Vyper is the Pythonic Programming Language for the Ethereum Virtual Machine. In versions up to and including 0.4.2rc1, the slice() builtin can elide side effects when the output length is 0, and the source bytestring is a builtin (msg.data or <address>.code). The reason is that for these source locations, the check that length >= 1 is skipped. The result is that a 0-length bytestring constructed with slice can be passed to make_byte_array_copier, which elides evaluation of its source argument when the max length is 0. The impact is that side effects in the start argument may be elided when the length argument is 0, e.g. slice(msg.data, self.do_side_effect(), 0). The fix in pull request 4645 disallows any invocation of slice() with length 0, including for the ad hoc locations discussed in this advisory. The fix is expected to be part of version 0.4.2.
- Record
CVE-2025-47774- CVSS 4.0
- 2.9 Low
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P - Weakness
- CWE-691
- Updated
- 2026-11-02
EUVDEUVD-2025-15443
2.9
Vyper is the Pythonic Programming Language for the Ethereum Virtual Machine. In versions up to and including 0.4.2rc1, the slice() builtin can elide side effects when the output length is 0, and the source bytestring is a builtin (msg.data or <address>.code). The reason is that for these source locations, the check that length >= 1 is skipped. The result is that a 0-length bytestring constructed with slice can be passed to make_byte_array_copier, which elides evaluation of its source argument when the max length is 0. The impact is that side effects in the start argument may be elided when the length argument is 0, e.g. slice(msg.data, self.do_side_effect(), 0). The fix in pull request 4645 disallows any invocation of slice() with length 0, including for the ad hoc locations discussed in this advisory. The fix is expected to be part of version 0.4.2.
- Record
EUVD-2025-15443- CVSS 4.0
- 2.9 Low
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P - Updated
- 2026-11-02
GitHub AdvisoriesGHSA-3vcg-j39x-cwfm
2.9
Vyper's `slice()` may elide side-effects when output length is 0
Impact
the slice() builtin can elide side effects when the output length is 0, and the source bytestring is a builtin (msg.data or <address>.code). the reason is that for these source locations, the check that length >= 1 is skipped:
https://github.com/vyperlang/vyper/blob/68b68c4b30c5ef2f312b4674676170b8a6eaa316/vyper/builtins/functions.py#L315-L319
the result is that a 0-length bytestring constructed with slice can be passed to make_byte_array_copier, which elides evaluation of its source argument when the max length is 0:
https://github.com/vyperlang/vyper/blob/68b68c4b30c5ef2f312b4674676170b8a6eaa316/vyper/codegen/core.py#L189-L191
the impact is that side effects in the start argument may be elided when the length argument is 0, e.g. slice(msg.data, self.do_side_effect(), 0).
the following example illustrates how the issue would look in user code
counter: public(uint256)
@external
def test() -> Bytes[10]:
b: Bytes[10] = slice(msg.data, self.side_effect(), 0)
return b
def side_effect() -> uint256:
self.counter += 1
return 0
the severity assigned is low, since this is not a very useful pattern and unlikely to be found in user code.
Patches
the fix is tracked in https://github.com/vyperlang/vyper/pull/4645, which disallows any invocation of slice() with length 0, including for the ad hoc locations discussed in this advisory.
Workarounds
Is there a way for users to fix or remediate the vulnerability without upgrading?
References
Are there any links users can visit to find out more?
- Record
GHSA-3vcg-j39x-cwfm- CVSS 4.0
- 2.9 Low
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P - Weakness
- CWE-691
- Updated
- 2026-11-02
NVD
2.9
Vyper is the Pythonic Programming Language for the Ethereum Virtual Machine. In versions up to and including 0.4.2rc1, the slice() builtin can elide side effects when the output length is 0, and the source bytestring is a builtin (msg.data or <address>.code). The reason is that for these source locations, the check that length >= 1 is skipped. The result is that a 0-length bytestring constructed with slice can be passed to make_byte_array_copier, which elides evaluation of its source argument when the max length is 0. The impact is that side effects in the start argument may be elided when the length argument is 0, e.g. slice(msg.data, self.do_side_effect(), 0). The fix in pull request 4645 disallows any invocation of slice() with length 0, including for the ad hoc locations discussed in this advisory. The fix is expected to be part of version 0.4.2.
- Record
CVE-2025-47774- CVSS 4.0
- 2.9 Low
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X - Weakness
- CWE-691
- Updated
- 2026-11-02
OSV
2.9
Vyper's `slice()` may elide side-effects when output length is 0
Vyper is the Pythonic Programming Language for the Ethereum Virtual Machine. In versions up to and including 0.4.2rc1, the slice() builtin can elide side effects when the output length is 0, and the source bytestring is a builtin (msg.data or <address>.code). The reason is that for these source locations, the check that length >= 1 is skipped. The result is that a 0-length bytestring constructed with slice can be passed to make_byte_array_copier, which elides evaluation of its source argument when the max length is 0. The impact is that side effects in the start argument may be elided when the length argument is 0, e.g. slice(msg.data, self.do_side_effect(), 0). The fix in pull request 4645 disallows any invocation of slice() with length 0, including for the ad hoc locations discussed in this advisory. The fix is expected to be part of version 0.4.2.
- Record
CVE-2025-47774- CVSS 4.0
- 2.9 Low
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P - Weakness
- CWE-691
- Updated
- 2026-11-02
OSVGHSA-3vcg-j39x-cwfm
2.9
Vyper's `slice()` may elide side-effects when output length is 0
Impact
the slice() builtin can elide side effects when the output length is 0, and the source bytestring is a builtin (msg.data or <address>.code). the reason is that for these source locations, the check that length >= 1 is skipped:
https://github.com/vyperlang/vyper/blob/68b68c4b30c5ef2f312b4674676170b8a6eaa316/vyper/builtins/functions.py#L315-L319
the result is that a 0-length bytestring constructed with slice can be passed to make_byte_array_copier, which elides evaluation of its source argument when the max length is 0:
https://github.com/vyperlang/vyper/blob/68b68c4b30c5ef2f312b4674676170b8a6eaa316/vyper/codegen/core.py#L189-L191
the impact is that side effects in the start argument may be elided when the length argument is 0, e.g. slice(msg.data, self.do_side_effect(), 0).
the following example illustrates how the issue would look in user code
counter: public(uint256)
@external
def test() -> Bytes[10]:
b: Bytes[10] = slice(msg.data, self.side_effect(), 0)
return b
def side_effect() -> uint256:
self.counter += 1
return 0
the severity assigned is low, since this is not a very useful pattern and unlikely to be found in user code.
Patches
the fix is tracked in https://github.com/vyperlang/vyper/pull/4645, which disallows any invocation of slice() with length 0, including for the ad hoc locations discussed in this advisory.
Workarounds
Is there a way for users to fix or remediate the vulnerability without upgrading?
References
Are there any links users can visit to find out more?
- Record
GHSA-3vcg-j39x-cwfm- CVSS 4.0
- 2.9 Low
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P - Weakness
- CWE-691
- Updated
- 2026-11-02
OSVPYSEC-2026-2028
2.9
Vyper's `slice()` may elide side-effects when output length is 0
Impact
the slice() builtin can elide side effects when the output length is 0, and the source bytestring is a builtin (msg.data or <address>.code). the reason is that for these source locations, the check that length >= 1 is skipped:
https://github.com/vyperlang/vyper/blob/68b68c4b30c5ef2f312b4674676170b8a6eaa316/vyper/builtins/functions.py#L315-L319
the result is that a 0-length bytestring constructed with slice can be passed to make_byte_array_copier, which elides evaluation of its source argument when the max length is 0:
https://github.com/vyperlang/vyper/blob/68b68c4b30c5ef2f312b4674676170b8a6eaa316/vyper/codegen/core.py#L189-L191
the impact is that side effects in the start argument may be elided when the length argument is 0, e.g. slice(msg.data, self.do_side_effect(), 0).
the following example illustrates how the issue would look in user code
counter: public(uint256)
@external
def test() -> Bytes[10]:
b: Bytes[10] = slice(msg.data, self.side_effect(), 0)
return b
def side_effect() -> uint256:
self.counter += 1
return 0
the severity assigned is low, since this is not a very useful pattern and unlikely to be found in user code.
Patches
the fix is tracked in https://github.com/vyperlang/vyper/pull/4645, which disallows any invocation of slice() with length 0, including for the ad hoc locations discussed in this advisory.
Workarounds
Is there a way for users to fix or remediate the vulnerability without upgrading?
References
Are there any links users can visit to find out more?
- Record
PYSEC-2026-2028- CVSS 4.0
- 2.9 Low
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P - Updated
- 2026-11-02
Affected products
Affected packages
| Package | Affected | Fixed |
|---|---|---|
vyperPyPI |
through 0.4.2rc1 | None known |
vyperPyPI |
through 0.4.2rc1, plus listed versions 0.1.0b10.1.0b100.1.0b110.1.0b120.1.0b13 Show 45 moreShow less0.1.0b140.1.0b150.1.0b160.1.0b170.1.0b20.1.0b30.1.0b40.1.0b50.1.0b60.1.0b70.1.0b80.1.0b90.2.10.2.100.2.110.2.120.2.130.2.140.2.150.2.160.2.20.2.30.2.40.2.50.2.60.2.70.2.80.2.90.3.00.3.10.3.100.3.10rc10.3.10rc20.3.10rc30.3.10rc40.3.10rc50.3.20.3.30.3.40.3.50.3.60.3.70.3.80.3.90.4.0 |
None known |
History
| Recorded | Changed | Sources |
|---|---|---|
| first indexed | CVE List, EUVD, GitHub Advisories, NVD, OSV |
Dates are when Every CVE recorded each change. Upstream dates may differ.
In short
CVE-2025-47774 is a low vulnerability (CVSS 2.9) in Vyperlang Vyper, published May 15, 2025. No source lists public exploit code. EPSS puts the chance of exploitation in the next 30 days at 0.48%, the 41st percentile. No source names a fixed version.
References
github.com/vyperlang/vyper/security/advisories/GHSA-3vcg-j39x-cwfm
github.com/vyperlang/vyper/pull/4645
github.com/vyperlang/vyper/blob/68b68c4b30c5ef2f312b4674676170b8a6eaa316/vyper/builtins/functions.py
github.com/vyperlang/vyper/blob/68b68c4b30c5ef2f312b4674676170b8a6eaa316/vyper/codegen/core.py
nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2025-47774
github.com/advisories/GHSA-3vcg-j39x-cwfm
github.com/CVEProject/cvelistV5/tree/main/cves/2025/47xxx/CVE-2025-47774.json
github.com/vyperlang/vyper
pypi.org/project/vyper
Left out here: 20 versions. The JSON record has them.