Every CVE Search/ Get API key

CVE-2025-47774

Vyper's `slice()` may elide side-effects when output length is 0

2.9 Low

Vyper is the Pythonic Programming Language for the Ethereum Virtual Machine. In versions up to and including 0.4.2rc1, the slice() builtin can elide side effects when the output length is 0, and the source bytestring is a builtin (msg.data or <address>.code). The reason is that for these source locations, the check that length >= 1 is skipped. The result is that a 0-length bytestring constructed with slice can be passed to make_byte_array_copier, which elides evaluation of its source argument when the max length is 0. The impact is that side effects in the start argument may be elided when the length argument is 0, e.g. slice(msg.data, self.do_side_effect(), 0). The fix in pull request 4645 disallows any invocation of slice() with length 0, including for the ad hoc locations discussed in this advisory. The fix is expected to be part of version 0.4.2.

Attack profile

How easy it is to exploit

Attack vector
Network
Complexity
Low
Privileges needed
None
User interaction
None

What an attacker can affect

Confidentiality
None
Integrity
Low
Availability
None

Exploit likelihood

0.48%Up 0.4 points since May 16, 2025
90%50%10%1%

What each source reports

CVE List Score used 2.9

Vyper's `slice()` may elide side-effects when output length is 0

Vyper is the Pythonic Programming Language for the Ethereum Virtual Machine. In versions up to and including 0.4.2rc1, the slice() builtin can elide side effects when the output length is 0, and the source bytestring is a builtin (msg.data or <address>.code). The reason is that for these source locations, the check that length >= 1 is skipped. The result is that a 0-length bytestring constructed with slice can be passed to make_byte_array_copier, which elides evaluation of its source argument when the max length is 0. The impact is that side effects in the start argument may be elided when the length argument is 0, e.g. slice(msg.data, self.do_side_effect(), 0). The fix in pull request 4645 disallows any invocation of slice() with length 0, including for the ad hoc locations discussed in this advisory. The fix is expected to be part of version 0.4.2.

Record
CVE-2025-47774
CVSS 4.0
2.9 LowCVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P
Weakness
CWE-691
Updated
2026-11-02
EUVDEUVD-2025-15443 2.9

Vyper is the Pythonic Programming Language for the Ethereum Virtual Machine. In versions up to and including 0.4.2rc1, the slice() builtin can elide side effects when the output length is 0, and the source bytestring is a builtin (msg.data or <address>.code). The reason is that for these source locations, the check that length >= 1 is skipped. The result is that a 0-length bytestring constructed with slice can be passed to make_byte_array_copier, which elides evaluation of its source argument when the max length is 0. The impact is that side effects in the start argument may be elided when the length argument is 0, e.g. slice(msg.data, self.do_side_effect(), 0). The fix in pull request 4645 disallows any invocation of slice() with length 0, including for the ad hoc locations discussed in this advisory. The fix is expected to be part of version 0.4.2.

Record
EUVD-2025-15443
CVSS 4.0
2.9 LowCVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P
Updated
2026-11-02
GitHub AdvisoriesGHSA-3vcg-j39x-cwfm 2.9

Vyper's `slice()` may elide side-effects when output length is 0

Impact

the slice() builtin can elide side effects when the output length is 0, and the source bytestring is a builtin (msg.data or <address>.code). the reason is that for these source locations, the check that length >= 1 is skipped: https://github.com/vyperlang/vyper/blob/68b68c4b30c5ef2f312b4674676170b8a6eaa316/vyper/builtins/functions.py#L315-L319

the result is that a 0-length bytestring constructed with slice can be passed to make_byte_array_copier, which elides evaluation of its source argument when the max length is 0: https://github.com/vyperlang/vyper/blob/68b68c4b30c5ef2f312b4674676170b8a6eaa316/vyper/codegen/core.py#L189-L191

the impact is that side effects in the start argument may be elided when the length argument is 0, e.g. slice(msg.data, self.do_side_effect(), 0).

the following example illustrates how the issue would look in user code

counter: public(uint256)

@external
def test() -> Bytes[10]:
    b: Bytes[10] = slice(msg.data, self.side_effect(), 0)
    return b

def side_effect() -> uint256:
    self.counter += 1
    return 0

the severity assigned is low, since this is not a very useful pattern and unlikely to be found in user code.

Patches

the fix is tracked in https://github.com/vyperlang/vyper/pull/4645, which disallows any invocation of slice() with length 0, including for the ad hoc locations discussed in this advisory.

Workarounds

Is there a way for users to fix or remediate the vulnerability without upgrading?

References

Are there any links users can visit to find out more?

Record
GHSA-3vcg-j39x-cwfm
CVSS 4.0
2.9 LowCVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P
Weakness
CWE-691
Updated
2026-11-02
NVD 2.9

Vyper is the Pythonic Programming Language for the Ethereum Virtual Machine. In versions up to and including 0.4.2rc1, the slice() builtin can elide side effects when the output length is 0, and the source bytestring is a builtin (msg.data or <address>.code). The reason is that for these source locations, the check that length >= 1 is skipped. The result is that a 0-length bytestring constructed with slice can be passed to make_byte_array_copier, which elides evaluation of its source argument when the max length is 0. The impact is that side effects in the start argument may be elided when the length argument is 0, e.g. slice(msg.data, self.do_side_effect(), 0). The fix in pull request 4645 disallows any invocation of slice() with length 0, including for the ad hoc locations discussed in this advisory. The fix is expected to be part of version 0.4.2.

Record
CVE-2025-47774
CVSS 4.0
2.9 LowCVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Weakness
CWE-691
Updated
2026-11-02
OSV 2.9

Vyper's `slice()` may elide side-effects when output length is 0

Vyper is the Pythonic Programming Language for the Ethereum Virtual Machine. In versions up to and including 0.4.2rc1, the slice() builtin can elide side effects when the output length is 0, and the source bytestring is a builtin (msg.data or <address>.code). The reason is that for these source locations, the check that length >= 1 is skipped. The result is that a 0-length bytestring constructed with slice can be passed to make_byte_array_copier, which elides evaluation of its source argument when the max length is 0. The impact is that side effects in the start argument may be elided when the length argument is 0, e.g. slice(msg.data, self.do_side_effect(), 0). The fix in pull request 4645 disallows any invocation of slice() with length 0, including for the ad hoc locations discussed in this advisory. The fix is expected to be part of version 0.4.2.

Record
CVE-2025-47774
CVSS 4.0
2.9 LowCVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P
Weakness
CWE-691
Updated
2026-11-02
OSVGHSA-3vcg-j39x-cwfm 2.9

Vyper's `slice()` may elide side-effects when output length is 0

Impact

the slice() builtin can elide side effects when the output length is 0, and the source bytestring is a builtin (msg.data or <address>.code). the reason is that for these source locations, the check that length >= 1 is skipped: https://github.com/vyperlang/vyper/blob/68b68c4b30c5ef2f312b4674676170b8a6eaa316/vyper/builtins/functions.py#L315-L319

the result is that a 0-length bytestring constructed with slice can be passed to make_byte_array_copier, which elides evaluation of its source argument when the max length is 0: https://github.com/vyperlang/vyper/blob/68b68c4b30c5ef2f312b4674676170b8a6eaa316/vyper/codegen/core.py#L189-L191

the impact is that side effects in the start argument may be elided when the length argument is 0, e.g. slice(msg.data, self.do_side_effect(), 0).

the following example illustrates how the issue would look in user code

counter: public(uint256)

@external
def test() -> Bytes[10]:
    b: Bytes[10] = slice(msg.data, self.side_effect(), 0)
    return b

def side_effect() -> uint256:
    self.counter += 1
    return 0

the severity assigned is low, since this is not a very useful pattern and unlikely to be found in user code.

Patches

the fix is tracked in https://github.com/vyperlang/vyper/pull/4645, which disallows any invocation of slice() with length 0, including for the ad hoc locations discussed in this advisory.

Workarounds

Is there a way for users to fix or remediate the vulnerability without upgrading?

References

Are there any links users can visit to find out more?

Record
GHSA-3vcg-j39x-cwfm
CVSS 4.0
2.9 LowCVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P
Weakness
CWE-691
Updated
2026-11-02
OSVPYSEC-2026-2028 2.9

Vyper's `slice()` may elide side-effects when output length is 0

Impact

the slice() builtin can elide side effects when the output length is 0, and the source bytestring is a builtin (msg.data or <address>.code). the reason is that for these source locations, the check that length >= 1 is skipped: https://github.com/vyperlang/vyper/blob/68b68c4b30c5ef2f312b4674676170b8a6eaa316/vyper/builtins/functions.py#L315-L319

the result is that a 0-length bytestring constructed with slice can be passed to make_byte_array_copier, which elides evaluation of its source argument when the max length is 0: https://github.com/vyperlang/vyper/blob/68b68c4b30c5ef2f312b4674676170b8a6eaa316/vyper/codegen/core.py#L189-L191

the impact is that side effects in the start argument may be elided when the length argument is 0, e.g. slice(msg.data, self.do_side_effect(), 0).

the following example illustrates how the issue would look in user code

counter: public(uint256)

@external
def test() -> Bytes[10]:
    b: Bytes[10] = slice(msg.data, self.side_effect(), 0)
    return b

def side_effect() -> uint256:
    self.counter += 1
    return 0

the severity assigned is low, since this is not a very useful pattern and unlikely to be found in user code.

Patches

the fix is tracked in https://github.com/vyperlang/vyper/pull/4645, which disallows any invocation of slice() with length 0, including for the ad hoc locations discussed in this advisory.

Workarounds

Is there a way for users to fix or remediate the vulnerability without upgrading?

References

Are there any links users can visit to find out more?

Record
PYSEC-2026-2028
CVSS 4.0
2.9 LowCVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P
Updated
2026-11-02

Affected products

Affected packages

Affected packages
PackageAffectedFixed
vyper
PyPI
through 0.4.2rc1 None known
vyper
PyPI
through 0.4.2rc1, plus listed versions
0.1.0b10.1.0b100.1.0b110.1.0b120.1.0b13
Show 45 moreShow less
0.1.0b140.1.0b150.1.0b160.1.0b170.1.0b20.1.0b30.1.0b40.1.0b50.1.0b60.1.0b70.1.0b80.1.0b90.2.10.2.100.2.110.2.120.2.130.2.140.2.150.2.160.2.20.2.30.2.40.2.50.2.60.2.70.2.80.2.90.3.00.3.10.3.100.3.10rc10.3.10rc20.3.10rc30.3.10rc40.3.10rc50.3.20.3.30.3.40.3.50.3.60.3.70.3.80.3.90.4.0
None known

History

History
RecordedChangedSources
first indexedCVE List, EUVD, GitHub Advisories, NVD, OSV

Dates are when Every CVE recorded each change. Upstream dates may differ.

In short

CVE-2025-47774 is a low vulnerability (CVSS 2.9) in Vyperlang Vyper, published May 15, 2025. No source lists public exploit code. EPSS puts the chance of exploitation in the next 30 days at 0.48%, the 41st percentile. No source names a fixed version.

References

This page doesn't list everything

Left out here: 20 versions. The JSON record has them.

MoveEnter Open