CVE-2025-52904
File Browser: Command Execution not Limited to Scope
File Browser provides a file managing interface within a specified directory and it can be used to upload, delete, preview, rename and edit files. In versions of the web application on the 2.x branch, all users have a scope assigned, and they only have access to the files within that scope. The Command Execution feature of Filebrowser allows the execution of shell commands which are not restricted to the scope, potentially giving an attacker read and write access to all files managed by the server. Until this issue is fixed, the maintainers recommend to completely disable Execute commands for all accounts. Since the command execution is an inherently dangerous feature that is not used by all deployments, it should be possible to completely disable it in the application's configuration. This feature has been disabled by default for all installations from v2.33.8 onwards, including for existent installations. To exploit this vulnerability, the instance administrator must turn on a feature and ignore all the warnings about known vulnerabilities.
Attack profile
How easy it is to exploit
- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- High
- Privileges needed
- High
- User interaction
- None
What an attacker can affect
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
Exploit likelihood
What each source reports
CVE List Score used
8.0
File Browser: Command Execution not Limited to Scope
File Browser provides a file managing interface within a specified directory and it can be used to upload, delete, preview, rename and edit files. In versions of the web application on the 2.x branch, all users have a scope assigned, and they only have access to the files within that scope. The Command Execution feature of Filebrowser allows the execution of shell commands which are not restricted to the scope, potentially giving an attacker read and write access to all files managed by the server. Until this issue is fixed, the maintainers recommend to completely disable Execute commands for all accounts. Since the command execution is an inherently dangerous feature that is not used by all deployments, it should be possible to completely disable it in the application's configuration. This feature has been disabled by default for all installations from v2.33.8 onwards, including for existent installations. To exploit this vulnerability, the instance administrator must turn on a feature and ignore all the warnings about known vulnerabilities.
- Record
CVE-2025-52904- CVSS 3.1
- 8.0 High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H - Weakness
- CWE-77
- Updated
- 2026-11-02
EUVDEUVD-2025-19557
8.0
File Browser provides a file managing interface within a specified directory and it can be used to upload, delete, preview, rename and edit files. In versions of the web application on the 2.x branch, all users have a scope assigned, and they only have access to the files within that scope. The Command Execution feature of Filebrowser allows the execution of shell commands which are not restricted to the scope, potentially giving an attacker read and write access to all files managed by the server. Until this issue is fixed, the maintainers recommend to completely disable Execute commands for all accounts. Since the command execution is an inherently dangerous feature that is not used by all deployments, it should be possible to completely disable it in the application's configuration. This feature has been disabled by default for all installations from v2.33.8 onwards, including for existent installations. To exploit this vulnerability, the instance administrator must turn on a feature and ignore all the warnings about known vulnerabilities.
- Record
EUVD-2025-19557- CVSS 3.1
- 8.0 High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H - Updated
- 2026-11-02
GitHub AdvisoriesGHSA-hc8f-m8g5-8362
8.0
File Browser: Command Execution not Limited to Scope
[!NOTE] This feature has been disabled by default for all installations from v2.33.8 onwards, including for existent installations. To exploit this vulnerability, the instance administrator must turn on a feature and ignore all the warnings about known vulnerabilities. We're publishing this new advisory to make it clear that all vulnerabilities concerning this feature are disclosed.
For more information about tracking vulnerability issues related to the Command Execution features, check https://github.com/filebrowser/filebrowser/issues/5199.
Summary
In the web application, all users have a scope assigned, and they only have access to the files within that scope. The Command Execution feature of Filebrowser allows the execution of shell commands which are not restricted to the scope, potentially giving an attacker read and write access to all files managed by the server.
Impact
Shell commands are executed with the uid of the server process without any further restrictions. This means, that they will have access to at least
- all files managed by the application from all scopes, even those the user does not have access to in the GUI.
- the Filebrowser database file containing the password hashes of all accounts.
The concrete impact depends on the commands being granted to the attacker, but due to other vulnerabilities identified ("Bypass Command Execution Allowlist", "Shell Commands Can Spawn Other Commands", "Insecure File Permissions") it is likely, that full read- and write-access will exist.
Read access to the database means, that the attacker is capable of extracting all user password hashes. This enables an offline dictionary attack on the passwords of all accounts, though the choice of the password hash function (bcrypt with a complexity of 10) gives a strong protection against such attacks. Write access to the database means that attackers are capable of changing a user's password hash, allowing them to impersonate any user account, including an administrator.
Vulnerability Description
Shell commands executed by a user are created as a simple subprocess of the application without any further restrictions. That means, that they have full access to files accessible by the application. The scope that is assigned to every account is not considered.
As a prerequisite, an attacker needs an account with the Execute Commands permission and some permitted commands.
Proof of Concept
Any exploit highly depends on the commands granted to the attacker.
The following screenshot shows, how all password hashes can be extracted using only the grep command:
Recommended Countermeasures
Until this issue is fixed, we recommend to completely disable Execute commands for all accounts.
Since the command execution is an inherently dangerous feature that is not used by all deployments, it should be possible to completely disable it in the application's configuration.
As a defense-in-depth measure, organizations not requiring command execution should operate the Filebrowser from a distroless container image.
There are two approaches to fixing this issue:
- Limiting the process when it is started e.g., by using user namespaces with a tool like Bubblewrap. If this path is chosen, it is important to use a method that works both on a bare-metal server and within an unprivileged container.
- Re-architecting the command execution feature so that file in the various scopes have a distinct uid as an owner and all shell command are executed under the uid of the user's scope.
Timeline
2025-03-26Identified the vulnerability in version 2.32.02025-04-11Contacted the project2025-04-18Vulnerability disclosed to the project2025-06-25Uploaded advisories to the project's GitHub repository2025-06-25CVE ID assigned by GitHub2025-06-25A patch…
- Record
GHSA-hc8f-m8g5-8362- CVSS 3.1
- 8.0 High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H - Weakness
- CWE-77
- Updated
- 2026-11-02
NVD
8.0
File Browser provides a file managing interface within a specified directory and it can be used to upload, delete, preview, rename and edit files. In versions of the web application on the 2.x branch, all users have a scope assigned, and they only have access to the files within that scope. The Command Execution feature of Filebrowser allows the execution of shell commands which are not restricted to the scope, potentially giving an attacker read and write access to all files managed by the server. Until this issue is fixed, the maintainers recommend to completely disable Execute commands for all accounts. Since the command execution is an inherently dangerous feature that is not used by all deployments, it should be possible to completely disable it in the application's configuration. This feature has been disabled by default for all installations from v2.33.8 onwards, including for existent installations. To exploit this vulnerability, the instance administrator must turn on a feature and ignore all the warnings about known vulnerabilities.
- Record
CVE-2025-52904- CVSS 3.1
- 8.0 High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H - Weakness
- CWE-77
- Updated
- 2026-11-02
OSV
8.0
File Browser: Command Execution not Limited to Scope
File Browser provides a file managing interface within a specified directory and it can be used to upload, delete, preview, rename and edit files. In versions of the web application on the 2.x branch, all users have a scope assigned, and they only have access to the files within that scope. The Command Execution feature of Filebrowser allows the execution of shell commands which are not restricted to the scope, potentially giving an attacker read and write access to all files managed by the server. Until this issue is fixed, the maintainers recommend to completely disable Execute commands for all accounts. Since the command execution is an inherently dangerous feature that is not used by all deployments, it should be possible to completely disable it in the application's configuration. This feature has been disabled by default for all installations from v2.33.8 onwards, including for existent installations. To exploit this vulnerability, the instance administrator must turn on a feature and ignore all the warnings about known vulnerabilities.
- Record
CVE-2025-52904- CVSS 3.1
- 8.0 High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H - Weakness
- CWE-77
- Updated
- 2026-11-02
OSVGHSA-hc8f-m8g5-8362
8.0
File Browser: Command Execution not Limited to Scope
[!NOTE] This feature has been disabled by default for all installations from v2.33.8 onwards, including for existent installations. To exploit this vulnerability, the instance administrator must turn on a feature and ignore all the warnings about known vulnerabilities. We're publishing this new advisory to make it clear that all vulnerabilities concerning this feature are disclosed.
For more information about tracking vulnerability issues related to the Command Execution features, check https://github.com/filebrowser/filebrowser/issues/5199.
Summary
In the web application, all users have a scope assigned, and they only have access to the files within that scope. The Command Execution feature of Filebrowser allows the execution of shell commands which are not restricted to the scope, potentially giving an attacker read and write access to all files managed by the server.
Impact
Shell commands are executed with the uid of the server process without any further restrictions. This means, that they will have access to at least
- all files managed by the application from all scopes, even those the user does not have access to in the GUI.
- the Filebrowser database file containing the password hashes of all accounts.
The concrete impact depends on the commands being granted to the attacker, but due to other vulnerabilities identified ("Bypass Command Execution Allowlist", "Shell Commands Can Spawn Other Commands", "Insecure File Permissions") it is likely, that full read- and write-access will exist.
Read access to the database means, that the attacker is capable of extracting all user password hashes. This enables an offline dictionary attack on the passwords of all accounts, though the choice of the password hash function (bcrypt with a complexity of 10) gives a strong protection against such attacks. Write access to the database means that attackers are capable of changing a user's password hash, allowing them to impersonate any user account, including an administrator.
Vulnerability Description
Shell commands executed by a user are created as a simple subprocess of the application without any further restrictions. That means, that they have full access to files accessible by the application. The scope that is assigned to every account is not considered.
As a prerequisite, an attacker needs an account with the Execute Commands permission and some permitted commands.
Proof of Concept
Any exploit highly depends on the commands granted to the attacker.
The following screenshot shows, how all password hashes can be extracted using only the grep command:
Recommended Countermeasures
Until this issue is fixed, we recommend to completely disable Execute commands for all accounts.
Since the command execution is an inherently dangerous feature that is not used by all deployments, it should be possible to completely disable it in the application's configuration.
As a defense-in-depth measure, organizations not requiring command execution should operate the Filebrowser from a distroless container image.
There are two approaches to fixing this issue:
- Limiting the process when it is started e.g., by using user namespaces with a tool like Bubblewrap. If this path is chosen, it is important to use a method that works both on a bare-metal server and within an unprivileged container.
- Re-architecting the command execution feature so that file in the various scopes have a distinct uid as an owner and all shell command are executed under the uid of the user's scope.
Timeline
2025-03-26Identified the vulnerability in version 2.32.02025-04-11Contacted the project2025-04-18Vulnerability disclosed to the project2025-06-25Uploaded advisories to the project's GitHub repository2025-06-25CVE ID assigned by GitHub2025-06-25A patch…
- Record
GHSA-hc8f-m8g5-8362- CVSS 3.1
- 8.0 High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H - Weakness
- CWE-77
- Updated
- 2026-11-02
OSVGO-2025-3793 No score
File Browser: Command Execution not Limited to Scope in github.com/filebrowser/filebrowser
File Browser: Command Execution not Limited to Scope in github.com/filebrowser/filebrowser
- Record
GO-2025-3793- Updated
- 2026-11-02
OSVopenSUSE-SU-2025:15405-1 No score
govulncheck-vulndb-0.0.20250730T213748-1.1 on GA media
These are all security issues fixed in the govulncheck-vulndb-0.0.20250730T213748-1.1 package on the GA media of openSUSE Tumbleweed.
- Record
openSUSE-SU-2025:15405-1- Updated
- 2026-11-02
Affected products
Affected packages
| Package | Affected | Fixed |
|---|---|---|
github.com/filebrowser/filebrowser/v2Go |
before 2.33.8 | 2.33.8 |
github.com/filebrowser/filebrowserGo |
All versions | None known |
github.com/filebrowser/filebrowser/v2Go |
All versions | None known |
govulncheck-vulndbopenSUSE:Tumbleweed From an advisory covering 56 CVEs |
before 0.0.20250730T213748-1.1 | 0.0.20250730T213748-1.1 |
History
| Recorded | Changed | Sources |
|---|---|---|
| affected, facts | ||
| first indexed | CVE List, EUVD, GitHub Advisories, NVD, OSV |
Dates are when Every CVE recorded each change. Upstream dates may differ.
In short
CVE-2025-52904 is a high vulnerability (CVSS 8.0) in Filebrowser, published June 26, 2025. No source lists public exploit code. EPSS puts the chance of exploitation in the next 30 days at 1.11%, the 66th percentile. Fixed in github.com/filebrowser/filebrowser/v2 2.33.8.
References
github.com/filebrowser/filebrowser/security/advisories/GHSA-hc8f-m8g5-8362
github.com/filebrowser/filebrowser/issues/5199
github.com/GoogleContainerTools/distroless
github.com/sbaresearch/advisories/tree/public/2025/SBA-ADV-20250326-01_Filebrowser_Command_Execution_Not_Limited_To_Scope
pkg.go.dev/vuln/GO-2025-3793
sloonz.github.io/posts/sandboxing-1
Show 60 moreShow less
nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2025-52904
github.com/advisories/GHSA-hc8f-m8g5-8362
github.com/CVEProject/cvelistV5/tree/main/cves/2025/52xxx/CVE-2025-52904.json
github.com/filebrowser/filebrowser
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2024-44905
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2024-44906
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2024-56731
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2025-0928
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2025-1088
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2025-30086
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2025-32019
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2025-3227
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2025-3228
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2025-3415
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2025-4563
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2025-4656
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2025-46702
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2025-4674
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2025-47281
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2025-47871
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2025-47943
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2025-4922
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2025-4981
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2025-49825
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2025-5030
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2025-51471
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2025-52477
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2025-52889
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2025-52890
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2025-52893
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2025-52894
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2025-52900
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2025-52901
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2025-52902
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2025-52903
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2025-52904
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2025-52995
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2025-52996
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2025-52997
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2025-53512
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2025-53513
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2025-53547
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2025-53632
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2025-53633
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2025-53634
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2025-53826
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2025-53893
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2025-53945
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2025-54059
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2025-54379
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2025-5689
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2025-5981
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2025-6023
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2025-6032
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2025-6224
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2025-6226
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2025-6227
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2025-6233
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2025-6264
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2025-6624
Left out here: the rest of 2 source descriptions. The JSON record has them.