CVE-2025-68158
Authlib: 1-click Account Takeover
Authlib is a Python library which builds OAuth and OpenID Connect servers. In versions 1.0.0 through 1.6.5, cache-backed state/request-token storage is not tied to the initiating user session, so CSRF is possible for any attacker that has a valid state (easily obtainable via an attacker-initiated authentication flow). When a cache is supplied to the OAuth client registry, FrameworkIntegration.set_state_data writes the entire state blob under state{app}_{state}, and get_state_data ignores the caller’s session altogether. This issue has been patched in version 1.6.6.
Attack profile
How easy it is to exploit
- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges needed
- Low
- User interaction
- Required
What an attacker can affect
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- None
Exploit likelihood
What each source reports
CVE List Score used
5.7
Authlib: 1-click Account Takeover
Authlib is a Python library which builds OAuth and OpenID Connect servers. In versions 1.0.0 through 1.6.5, cache-backed state/request-token storage is not tied to the initiating user session, so CSRF is possible for any attacker that has a valid state (easily obtainable via an attacker-initiated authentication flow). When a cache is supplied to the OAuth client registry, FrameworkIntegration.set_state_data writes the entire state blob under state{app}_{state}, and get_state_data ignores the caller’s session altogether. This issue has been patched in version 1.6.6.
- Record
CVE-2025-68158- CVSS 3.1
- 5.7 Medium
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N - Weakness
- CWE-352
- Updated
- 2026-11-02
EUVDEUVD-2025-206267
5.7
Authlib is a Python library which builds OAuth and OpenID Connect servers. In versions 1.0.0 through 1.6.5, cache-backed state/request-token storage is not tied to the initiating user session, so CSRF is possible for any attacker that has a valid state (easily obtainable via an attacker-initiated authentication flow). When a cache is supplied to the OAuth client registry, FrameworkIntegration.set_state_data writes the entire state blob under state{app}_{state}, and get_state_data ignores the caller’s session altogether. This issue has been patched in version 1.6.6.
- Record
EUVD-2025-206267- CVSS 3.1
- 5.7 Medium
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N - Updated
- 2026-11-02
GitHub AdvisoriesGHSA-fg6f-75jq-6523
5.7
Authlib has 1-click Account Takeover vulnerability
Security Advisory: Cache-Backed State Storage CSRF in Authlib
The Security Labs team at Snyk has reported a security issue affecting Authlib, identified during a recent research project.
The Snyk Security Labs team has identified a vulnerability that can result in a one-click account takeover in applications that utilize the Authlib library.
Description
Cache-backed state/request-token storage is not tied to the initiating user session, making CSRF possible for any attacker that possesses a valid state value (easily obtainable via an attacker-initiated authentication flow). When a cache is supplied to the OAuth client registry, FrameworkIntegration.set_state_data writes the entire state blob under _state_{app}_{state}, and get_state_data disregards the caller's session entirely. [1][2]
def _get_cache_data(self, key):
value = self.cache.get(key)
if not value:
return None
try:
return json.loads(value)
except (TypeError, ValueError):
return None
[snip]
def get_state_data(self, session, state):
key = f"_state_{self.name}_{state}"
if self.cache:
value = self._get_cache_data(key)
else:
value = session.get(key)
if value:
return value.get("data")
return None
authlib/integrations/base_client/framework_integration.py:12-41
Retrieval in authorize_access_token therefore succeeds for whichever browser presents that opaque value, and the token exchange proceeds with the attacker's authorization code. [3]
def authorize_access_token(self, **kwargs):
"""Fetch access token in one step.
:return: A token dict.
"""
params = request.args.to_dict(flat=True)
state = params.get("oauth_token")
if not state:
raise OAuthError(description='Missing "oauth_token" parameter')
data = self.framework.get_state_data(session, state)
if not data:
raise OAuthError(description='Missing "request_token" in temporary data')
params["request_token"] = data["request_token"]
params.update(kwargs)
self.framework.clear_state_data(session, state)
token = self.fetch_access_token(**params)
self.token = token
return token
authlib/integrations/flask_client/apps.py:57-76
This opens up an avenue for Login CSRF in applications that use cache-backed storage. Depending on the dependent application's implementation (e.g., whether it links accounts in the event of a login CSRF), this could lead to account takeover.
Proof of Concept
Consider a hypothetical application — AwesomeAuthlibApp. Assume that AwesomeAuthlibApp contains internal logic such that, when an already authenticated user performs a callback request, the application links the newly provided SSO identity to the existing user account associated with that request.
Under these conditions, an attacker can achieve account takeover within the application by performing the following actions:
- The attacker initiates an SSO OAuth flow but halts the process immediately before the callback request is made to AwesomeAuthlibApp.
- The attacker then induces a logged-in user (via phishing, a drive-by attack, or similar means) to perform a GET request containing the attacker's state value and authorization code to the AwesomeAuthlibApp callback endpoint. Because Authlib does not verify whether the state token is bound to the session performing the callback, the callback is processed, the authorization code is sent to the provider, and the account linking proceeds.
Once the GET request is executed, the attacker's SSO account becomes permanently linked to the victim's AwesomeAuthlibApp account.
Suggested Fix
Per the OAuth RFC [4], the state parameter should be tied to the user's session to prevent exactly such scenarios. One straightforward method of mitigating this issue is to…
- Record
GHSA-fg6f-75jq-6523- CVSS 3.1
- 5.7 Medium
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N - Weakness
- CWE-352
- Updated
- 2026-11-02
NVD
5.7
Authlib is a Python library which builds OAuth and OpenID Connect servers. In versions 1.0.0 through 1.6.5, cache-backed state/request-token storage is not tied to the initiating user session, so CSRF is possible for any attacker that has a valid state (easily obtainable via an attacker-initiated authentication flow). When a cache is supplied to the OAuth client registry, FrameworkIntegration.set_state_data writes the entire state blob under state{app}_{state}, and get_state_data ignores the caller’s session altogether. This issue has been patched in version 1.6.6.
- Record
CVE-2025-68158- CVSS 3.1
- 5.7 Medium
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N - CVSS 3.1
- 8.8 High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H - Weakness
- CWE-352
- Updated
- 2026-11-02
OSV
5.7
Authlib: 1-click Account Takeover
Authlib is a Python library which builds OAuth and OpenID Connect servers. In versions 1.0.0 through 1.6.5, cache-backed state/request-token storage is not tied to the initiating user session, so CSRF is possible for any attacker that has a valid state (easily obtainable via an attacker-initiated authentication flow). When a cache is supplied to the OAuth client registry, FrameworkIntegration.set_state_data writes the entire state blob under state{app}_{state}, and get_state_data ignores the caller’s session altogether. This issue has been patched in version 1.6.6.
- Record
CVE-2025-68158- CVSS 3.1
- 5.7 Medium
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N - Weakness
- CWE-352
- Updated
- 2026-11-02
OSVDEBIAN-CVE-2025-68158
8.8
Authlib is a Python library which builds OAuth and OpenID Connect servers. In versions 1.0.0 through 1.6.5, cache-backed state/request-token storage is not tied to the initiating user session, so CSRF is possible for any attacker that has a valid state (easily obtainable via an attacker-initiated authentication flow). When a cache is supplied to the OAuth client registry, FrameworkIntegration.set_state_data writes the entire state blob under state{app}_{state}, and get_state_data ignores the caller’s session altogether. This issue has been patched in version 1.6.6.
- Record
DEBIAN-CVE-2025-68158- CVSS 3.1
- 8.8 High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H - Updated
- 2026-11-02
Show 7 moreShow less
OSVGHSA-fg6f-75jq-6523
5.7
Authlib has 1-click Account Takeover vulnerability
Security Advisory: Cache-Backed State Storage CSRF in Authlib
The Security Labs team at Snyk has reported a security issue affecting Authlib, identified during a recent research project.
The Snyk Security Labs team has identified a vulnerability that can result in a one-click account takeover in applications that utilize the Authlib library.
Description
Cache-backed state/request-token storage is not tied to the initiating user session, making CSRF possible for any attacker that possesses a valid state value (easily obtainable via an attacker-initiated authentication flow). When a cache is supplied to the OAuth client registry, FrameworkIntegration.set_state_data writes the entire state blob under _state_{app}_{state}, and get_state_data disregards the caller's session entirely. [1][2]
def _get_cache_data(self, key):
value = self.cache.get(key)
if not value:
return None
try:
return json.loads(value)
except (TypeError, ValueError):
return None
[snip]
def get_state_data(self, session, state):
key = f"_state_{self.name}_{state}"
if self.cache:
value = self._get_cache_data(key)
else:
value = session.get(key)
if value:
return value.get("data")
return None
authlib/integrations/base_client/framework_integration.py:12-41
Retrieval in authorize_access_token therefore succeeds for whichever browser presents that opaque value, and the token exchange proceeds with the attacker's authorization code. [3]
def authorize_access_token(self, **kwargs):
"""Fetch access token in one step.
:return: A token dict.
"""
params = request.args.to_dict(flat=True)
state = params.get("oauth_token")
if not state:
raise OAuthError(description='Missing "oauth_token" parameter')
data = self.framework.get_state_data(session, state)
if not data:
raise OAuthError(description='Missing "request_token" in temporary data')
params["request_token"] = data["request_token"]
params.update(kwargs)
self.framework.clear_state_data(session, state)
token = self.fetch_access_token(**params)
self.token = token
return token
authlib/integrations/flask_client/apps.py:57-76
This opens up an avenue for Login CSRF in applications that use cache-backed storage. Depending on the dependent application's implementation (e.g., whether it links accounts in the event of a login CSRF), this could lead to account takeover.
Proof of Concept
Consider a hypothetical application — AwesomeAuthlibApp. Assume that AwesomeAuthlibApp contains internal logic such that, when an already authenticated user performs a callback request, the application links the newly provided SSO identity to the existing user account associated with that request.
Under these conditions, an attacker can achieve account takeover within the application by performing the following actions:
- The attacker initiates an SSO OAuth flow but halts the process immediately before the callback request is made to AwesomeAuthlibApp.
- The attacker then induces a logged-in user (via phishing, a drive-by attack, or similar means) to perform a GET request containing the attacker's state value and authorization code to the AwesomeAuthlibApp callback endpoint. Because Authlib does not verify whether the state token is bound to the session performing the callback, the callback is processed, the authorization code is sent to the provider, and the account linking proceeds.
Once the GET request is executed, the attacker's SSO account becomes permanently linked to the victim's AwesomeAuthlibApp account.
Suggested Fix
Per the OAuth RFC [4], the state parameter should be tied to the user's session to prevent exactly such scenarios. One straightforward method of mitigating this issue is to…
- Record
GHSA-fg6f-75jq-6523- CVSS 3.1
- 5.7 Medium
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N - Weakness
- CWE-352
- Updated
- 2026-11-02
OSVPYSEC-2026-1201
5.7
Authlib has 1-click Account Takeover vulnerability
Security Advisory: Cache-Backed State Storage CSRF in Authlib
The Security Labs team at Snyk has reported a security issue affecting Authlib, identified during a recent research project.
The Snyk Security Labs team has identified a vulnerability that can result in a one-click account takeover in applications that utilize the Authlib library.
Description
Cache-backed state/request-token storage is not tied to the initiating user session, making CSRF possible for any attacker that possesses a valid state value (easily obtainable via an attacker-initiated authentication flow). When a cache is supplied to the OAuth client registry, FrameworkIntegration.set_state_data writes the entire state blob under _state_{app}_{state}, and get_state_data disregards the caller's session entirely. [1][2]
def _get_cache_data(self, key):
value = self.cache.get(key)
if not value:
return None
try:
return json.loads(value)
except (TypeError, ValueError):
return None
[snip]
def get_state_data(self, session, state):
key = f"_state_{self.name}_{state}"
if self.cache:
value = self._get_cache_data(key)
else:
value = session.get(key)
if value:
return value.get("data")
return None
authlib/integrations/base_client/framework_integration.py:12-41
Retrieval in authorize_access_token therefore succeeds for whichever browser presents that opaque value, and the token exchange proceeds with the attacker's authorization code. [3]
def authorize_access_token(self, **kwargs):
"""Fetch access token in one step.
:return: A token dict.
"""
params = request.args.to_dict(flat=True)
state = params.get("oauth_token")
if not state:
raise OAuthError(description='Missing "oauth_token" parameter')
data = self.framework.get_state_data(session, state)
if not data:
raise OAuthError(description='Missing "request_token" in temporary data')
params["request_token"] = data["request_token"]
params.update(kwargs)
self.framework.clear_state_data(session, state)
token = self.fetch_access_token(**params)
self.token = token
return token
authlib/integrations/flask_client/apps.py:57-76
This opens up an avenue for Login CSRF in applications that use cache-backed storage. Depending on the dependent application's implementation (e.g., whether it links accounts in the event of a login CSRF), this could lead to account takeover.
Proof of Concept
Consider a hypothetical application — AwesomeAuthlibApp. Assume that AwesomeAuthlibApp contains internal logic such that, when an already authenticated user performs a callback request, the application links the newly provided SSO identity to the existing user account associated with that request.
Under these conditions, an attacker can achieve account takeover within the application by performing the following actions:
- The attacker initiates an SSO OAuth flow but halts the process immediately before the callback request is made to AwesomeAuthlibApp.
- The attacker then induces a logged-in user (via phishing, a drive-by attack, or similar means) to perform a GET request containing the attacker's state value and authorization code to the AwesomeAuthlibApp callback endpoint. Because Authlib does not verify whether the state token is bound to the session performing the callback, the callback is processed, the authorization code is sent to the provider, and the account linking proceeds.
Once the GET request is executed, the attacker's SSO account becomes permanently linked to the victim's AwesomeAuthlibApp account.
Suggested Fix
Per the OAuth RFC [4], the state parameter should be tied to the user's session to prevent exactly such scenarios. One straightforward method of mitigating this issue is to…
- Record
PYSEC-2026-1201- CVSS 3.1
- 5.7 Medium
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N - Updated
- 2026-11-02
OSVUBUNTU-CVE-2025-68158
5.7
Authlib is a Python library which builds OAuth and OpenID Connect servers. In versions 1.0.0 through 1.6.5, cache-backed state/request-token storage is not tied to the initiating user session, so CSRF is possible for any attacker that has a valid state (easily obtainable via an attacker-initiated authentication flow). When a cache is supplied to the OAuth client registry, FrameworkIntegration.set_state_data writes the entire state blob under state{app}_{state}, and get_state_data ignores the caller’s session altogether. This issue has been patched in version 1.6.6.
- Record
UBUNTU-CVE-2025-68158- CVSS 3.1
- 5.7 Medium
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N - CVSS 3.1
- 8.8 High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H - Updated
- 2026-11-02
OSVopenSUSE-SU-2026:10034-1 No score
python311-Authlib-1.6.6-1.1 on GA media
These are all security issues fixed in the python311-Authlib-1.6.6-1.1 package on the GA media of openSUSE Tumbleweed.
- Record
openSUSE-SU-2026:10034-1- Updated
- 2026-11-02
OSVopenSUSE-SU-2026:20257-1 No score
Security update for python-Authlib
This update for python-Authlib fixes the following issues:
Changes in python-Authlib:
- CVE-2025-68158: Fixed 1-click account takeover in applications that use the Authlib library (bsc#1256414)
- Record
openSUSE-SU-2026:20257-1- Updated
- 2026-11-02
OSVSUSE-SU-2026:0828-1 No score
Security update for python-Authlib
This update for python-Authlib fixes the following issues:
- CVE-2025-68158: Fixed 1-click account takeover in applications that use the Authlib library (bsc#1256414)
- Record
SUSE-SU-2026:0828-1- Updated
- 2026-11-02
OSVUSN-8065-1 No score
python-authlib vulnerabilities
Millie Solem discovered that Authlib did not properly restrict algorithm selection during JWT verification, allowing HMAC verification with asymmetric public keys when no algorithm was specified. A remote attacker could possibly use this issue to bypass signature verification and forge tokens, resulting in authentication bypass or privilege escalation. (CVE-2024-37568)
Muhammad Noman Ilyas discovered that Authlib did not properly enforce critical header parameter handling during JSON Web Signature verification, leading to unknown critical parameters being incorrectly accepted. A remote attacker could possibly use this issue to bypass security policies in mixed deployments, resulting in authentication bypass, replay attacks, or privilege escalation. (CVE-2025-59420)
Muhammad Noman Ilyas discovered that Authlib did not properly limit the size of JSON Web Signature or JSON Web Token header and signature segments. A remote attacker could possibly use this issue to cause excessive memory or processor consumption, leading to a denial of service. (CVE-2025-61920)
Muhammad Noman Ilyas discovered that Authlib performed unbounded decompression when processing certain compressed encrypted tokens. A remote attacker could possibly use this issue to send a specially crafted token that can be expanded to a large size during decompression, causing a denial of service. (CVE-2025-62706)
It was discovered that Authlib did not properly bind cached state information to the initiating user session during OAuth authentication flows. A remote attacker could possibly use this issue to perform cross- site request forgery attacks, resulting in unauthorized actions or authentication bypass. This issue only affected Ubuntu 24.04 LTS. (CVE-2025-68158)
- Record
USN-8065-1- Updated
- 2026-11-02
Affected products
Affected packages
| Package | Affected | Fixed |
|---|---|---|
authlibPyPI |
1.0.0 to 1.6.5 | 1.6.6 |
python-authlibDebian:12 |
before 1.2.0-1+deb12u1, plus listed versions 1.2.0-1 |
1.2.0-1+deb12u1 |
python-authlibDebian:13 |
before 1.6.0-1+deb13u1, plus listed versions 1.6.0-1 |
1.6.0-1+deb13u1 |
python-authlibDebian:14 |
before 1.6.6-1, plus listed versions 1.6.0-11.6.1-11.6.3-11.6.4-11.6.5-1 |
1.6.6-1 |
authlibPyPI |
1.0.0 up to 1.6.6, plus listed versions 1.0.11.1.01.2.01.2.11.3.0 Show 13 moreShow less1.3.11.3.21.4.01.4.11.5.01.5.11.5.21.6.01.6.11.6.21.6.31.6.41.6.5 |
1.6.6 |
python-AuthlibSUSE:Linux Enterprise Module for Python 3 15 SP7 |
before 1.3.1-150600.3.14.1 | 1.3.1-150600.3.14.1 |
python-AuthlibopenSUSE:Leap 15.6 |
before 1.3.1-150600.3.14.1 | 1.3.1-150600.3.14.1 |
python-authlibUbuntu:Pro:24.04:LTS |
before 1.3.0-1ubuntu0.1~esm1, plus listed versions 1.2.1-11.3.0-1 |
1.3.0-1ubuntu0.1~esm1 |
python-authlibUbuntu:25.10 |
All versions, plus listed versions 1.5.1-11.5.2-11.6.0-1 |
None known |
python-authlibUbuntu:Pro:22.04:LTS From an advisory covering 5 CVEs |
before 0.15.5-1ubuntu0.1~esm1, plus listed versions 0.15.4-10.15.5-1 |
0.15.5-1ubuntu0.1~esm1 |
python-authlibUbuntu:Pro:24.04:LTS From an advisory covering 5 CVEs |
before 1.3.0-1ubuntu0.1~esm1, plus listed versions 1.2.1-11.3.0-1 |
1.3.0-1ubuntu0.1~esm1 |
python-AuthlibopenSUSE:Tumbleweed |
before 1.6.6-1.1 | 1.6.6-1.1 |
python-AuthlibopenSUSE:Leap 16.0 |
before 1.5.2-bp160.2.1 | 1.5.2-bp160.2.1 |
History
| Recorded | Changed | Sources |
|---|---|---|
| affected, facts | ||
| first indexed | CVE List, EUVD, GitHub Advisories, NVD, OSV |
Dates are when Every CVE recorded each change. Upstream dates may differ.
In short
CVE-2025-68158 is a medium vulnerability (CVSS 5.7) in Authlib, published January 8, 2026. No source lists public exploit code. EPSS puts the chance of exploitation in the next 30 days at 0.27%, the 19th percentile. Fixed in authlib 1.6.6.
References
github.com/authlib/authlib/security/advisories/GHSA-fg6f-75jq-6523
github.com/authlib/authlib/commit/2808378611dd6fb2532b189a9087877d8f0c0489
github.com/authlib/authlib/commit/7974f45e4d7492ab5f527577677f2770ce423228
nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2025-68158
github.com/advisories/GHSA-fg6f-75jq-6523
github.com/CVEProject/cvelistV5/tree/main/cves/2025/68xxx/CVE-2025-68158.json
Show 13 moreShow less
security-tracker.debian.org/tracker/CVE-2025-68158
github.com/authlib/authlib
pypi.org/project/authlib
suse.com/support/update/announcement/2026/suse-su-20260828-1
bugzilla.suse.com/1256414
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2025-68158
ubuntu.com/security/CVE-2025-68158
cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68158
ubuntu.com/security/notices/USN-8065-1
ubuntu.com/security/CVE-2024-37568
ubuntu.com/security/CVE-2025-59420
ubuntu.com/security/CVE-2025-61920
ubuntu.com/security/CVE-2025-62706
Left out here: the rest of 3 source descriptions. The JSON record has them.