Every CVE Search/ Get API key

CVE-2025-68158

Authlib: 1-click Account Takeover

5.7 MediumFix available

Authlib is a Python library which builds OAuth and OpenID Connect servers. In versions 1.0.0 through 1.6.5, cache-backed state/request-token storage is not tied to the initiating user session, so CSRF is possible for any attacker that has a valid state (easily obtainable via an attacker-initiated authentication flow). When a cache is supplied to the OAuth client registry, FrameworkIntegration.set_state_data writes the entire state blob under state{app}_{state}, and get_state_data ignores the caller’s session altogether. This issue has been patched in version 1.6.6.

Attack profile

How easy it is to exploit

Attack vector
Network
Complexity
Low
Privileges needed
Low
User interaction
Required

What an attacker can affect

Confidentiality
High
Integrity
None
Availability
None

Exploit likelihood

0.27%Up 0.3 points since Jan 9, 2026
90%50%10%1%

What each source reports

CVE List Score used 5.7

Authlib: 1-click Account Takeover

Authlib is a Python library which builds OAuth and OpenID Connect servers. In versions 1.0.0 through 1.6.5, cache-backed state/request-token storage is not tied to the initiating user session, so CSRF is possible for any attacker that has a valid state (easily obtainable via an attacker-initiated authentication flow). When a cache is supplied to the OAuth client registry, FrameworkIntegration.set_state_data writes the entire state blob under state{app}_{state}, and get_state_data ignores the caller’s session altogether. This issue has been patched in version 1.6.6.

Record
CVE-2025-68158
CVSS 3.1
5.7 MediumCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
Weakness
CWE-352
Updated
2026-11-02
EUVDEUVD-2025-206267 5.7

Authlib is a Python library which builds OAuth and OpenID Connect servers. In versions 1.0.0 through 1.6.5, cache-backed state/request-token storage is not tied to the initiating user session, so CSRF is possible for any attacker that has a valid state (easily obtainable via an attacker-initiated authentication flow). When a cache is supplied to the OAuth client registry, FrameworkIntegration.set_state_data writes the entire state blob under state{app}_{state}, and get_state_data ignores the caller’s session altogether. This issue has been patched in version 1.6.6.

Record
EUVD-2025-206267
CVSS 3.1
5.7 MediumCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
Updated
2026-11-02
GitHub AdvisoriesGHSA-fg6f-75jq-6523 5.7

Authlib has 1-click Account Takeover vulnerability

Security Advisory: Cache-Backed State Storage CSRF in Authlib

The Security Labs team at Snyk has reported a security issue affecting Authlib, identified during a recent research project.

The Snyk Security Labs team has identified a vulnerability that can result in a one-click account takeover in applications that utilize the Authlib library.

Description

Cache-backed state/request-token storage is not tied to the initiating user session, making CSRF possible for any attacker that possesses a valid state value (easily obtainable via an attacker-initiated authentication flow). When a cache is supplied to the OAuth client registry, FrameworkIntegration.set_state_data writes the entire state blob under _state_{app}_{state}, and get_state_data disregards the caller's session entirely. [1][2]

    def _get_cache_data(self, key):
        value = self.cache.get(key)
        if not value:
            return None
        try:
            return json.loads(value)
        except (TypeError, ValueError):
            return None
[snip]
    def get_state_data(self, session, state):
        key = f"_state_{self.name}_{state}"
        if self.cache:
            value = self._get_cache_data(key)
        else:
            value = session.get(key)
        if value:
            return value.get("data")
        return None

authlib/integrations/base_client/framework_integration.py:12-41

Retrieval in authorize_access_token therefore succeeds for whichever browser presents that opaque value, and the token exchange proceeds with the attacker's authorization code. [3]

    def authorize_access_token(self, **kwargs):
        """Fetch access token in one step.

        :return: A token dict.
        """
        params = request.args.to_dict(flat=True)
        state = params.get("oauth_token")
        if not state:
            raise OAuthError(description='Missing "oauth_token" parameter')

        data = self.framework.get_state_data(session, state)
        if not data:
            raise OAuthError(description='Missing "request_token" in temporary data')

        params["request_token"] = data["request_token"]
        params.update(kwargs)
        self.framework.clear_state_data(session, state)
        token = self.fetch_access_token(**params)
        self.token = token
        return token

authlib/integrations/flask_client/apps.py:57-76

This opens up an avenue for Login CSRF in applications that use cache-backed storage. Depending on the dependent application's implementation (e.g., whether it links accounts in the event of a login CSRF), this could lead to account takeover.

Proof of Concept

Consider a hypothetical application — AwesomeAuthlibApp. Assume that AwesomeAuthlibApp contains internal logic such that, when an already authenticated user performs a callback request, the application links the newly provided SSO identity to the existing user account associated with that request.

Under these conditions, an attacker can achieve account takeover within the application by performing the following actions:

  1. The attacker initiates an SSO OAuth flow but halts the process immediately before the callback request is made to AwesomeAuthlibApp.
  2. The attacker then induces a logged-in user (via phishing, a drive-by attack, or similar means) to perform a GET request containing the attacker's state value and authorization code to the AwesomeAuthlibApp callback endpoint. Because Authlib does not verify whether the state token is bound to the session performing the callback, the callback is processed, the authorization code is sent to the provider, and the account linking proceeds.

Once the GET request is executed, the attacker's SSO account becomes permanently linked to the victim's AwesomeAuthlibApp account.

Suggested Fix

Per the OAuth RFC [4], the state parameter should be tied to the user's session to prevent exactly such scenarios. One straightforward method of mitigating this issue is to…

Record
GHSA-fg6f-75jq-6523
CVSS 3.1
5.7 MediumCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
Weakness
CWE-352
Updated
2026-11-02
NVD 5.7

Authlib is a Python library which builds OAuth and OpenID Connect servers. In versions 1.0.0 through 1.6.5, cache-backed state/request-token storage is not tied to the initiating user session, so CSRF is possible for any attacker that has a valid state (easily obtainable via an attacker-initiated authentication flow). When a cache is supplied to the OAuth client registry, FrameworkIntegration.set_state_data writes the entire state blob under state{app}_{state}, and get_state_data ignores the caller’s session altogether. This issue has been patched in version 1.6.6.

Record
CVE-2025-68158
CVSS 3.1
5.7 MediumCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
CVSS 3.1
8.8 HighCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Weakness
CWE-352
Updated
2026-11-02
OSV 5.7

Authlib: 1-click Account Takeover

Authlib is a Python library which builds OAuth and OpenID Connect servers. In versions 1.0.0 through 1.6.5, cache-backed state/request-token storage is not tied to the initiating user session, so CSRF is possible for any attacker that has a valid state (easily obtainable via an attacker-initiated authentication flow). When a cache is supplied to the OAuth client registry, FrameworkIntegration.set_state_data writes the entire state blob under state{app}_{state}, and get_state_data ignores the caller’s session altogether. This issue has been patched in version 1.6.6.

Record
CVE-2025-68158
CVSS 3.1
5.7 MediumCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
Weakness
CWE-352
Updated
2026-11-02
OSVDEBIAN-CVE-2025-68158 8.8

Authlib is a Python library which builds OAuth and OpenID Connect servers. In versions 1.0.0 through 1.6.5, cache-backed state/request-token storage is not tied to the initiating user session, so CSRF is possible for any attacker that has a valid state (easily obtainable via an attacker-initiated authentication flow). When a cache is supplied to the OAuth client registry, FrameworkIntegration.set_state_data writes the entire state blob under state{app}_{state}, and get_state_data ignores the caller’s session altogether. This issue has been patched in version 1.6.6.

Record
DEBIAN-CVE-2025-68158
CVSS 3.1
8.8 HighCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Updated
2026-11-02
Show 7 moreShow less
OSVGHSA-fg6f-75jq-6523 5.7

Authlib has 1-click Account Takeover vulnerability

Security Advisory: Cache-Backed State Storage CSRF in Authlib

The Security Labs team at Snyk has reported a security issue affecting Authlib, identified during a recent research project.

The Snyk Security Labs team has identified a vulnerability that can result in a one-click account takeover in applications that utilize the Authlib library.

Description

Cache-backed state/request-token storage is not tied to the initiating user session, making CSRF possible for any attacker that possesses a valid state value (easily obtainable via an attacker-initiated authentication flow). When a cache is supplied to the OAuth client registry, FrameworkIntegration.set_state_data writes the entire state blob under _state_{app}_{state}, and get_state_data disregards the caller's session entirely. [1][2]

    def _get_cache_data(self, key):
        value = self.cache.get(key)
        if not value:
            return None
        try:
            return json.loads(value)
        except (TypeError, ValueError):
            return None
[snip]
    def get_state_data(self, session, state):
        key = f"_state_{self.name}_{state}"
        if self.cache:
            value = self._get_cache_data(key)
        else:
            value = session.get(key)
        if value:
            return value.get("data")
        return None

authlib/integrations/base_client/framework_integration.py:12-41

Retrieval in authorize_access_token therefore succeeds for whichever browser presents that opaque value, and the token exchange proceeds with the attacker's authorization code. [3]

    def authorize_access_token(self, **kwargs):
        """Fetch access token in one step.

        :return: A token dict.
        """
        params = request.args.to_dict(flat=True)
        state = params.get("oauth_token")
        if not state:
            raise OAuthError(description='Missing "oauth_token" parameter')

        data = self.framework.get_state_data(session, state)
        if not data:
            raise OAuthError(description='Missing "request_token" in temporary data')

        params["request_token"] = data["request_token"]
        params.update(kwargs)
        self.framework.clear_state_data(session, state)
        token = self.fetch_access_token(**params)
        self.token = token
        return token

authlib/integrations/flask_client/apps.py:57-76

This opens up an avenue for Login CSRF in applications that use cache-backed storage. Depending on the dependent application's implementation (e.g., whether it links accounts in the event of a login CSRF), this could lead to account takeover.

Proof of Concept

Consider a hypothetical application — AwesomeAuthlibApp. Assume that AwesomeAuthlibApp contains internal logic such that, when an already authenticated user performs a callback request, the application links the newly provided SSO identity to the existing user account associated with that request.

Under these conditions, an attacker can achieve account takeover within the application by performing the following actions:

  1. The attacker initiates an SSO OAuth flow but halts the process immediately before the callback request is made to AwesomeAuthlibApp.
  2. The attacker then induces a logged-in user (via phishing, a drive-by attack, or similar means) to perform a GET request containing the attacker's state value and authorization code to the AwesomeAuthlibApp callback endpoint. Because Authlib does not verify whether the state token is bound to the session performing the callback, the callback is processed, the authorization code is sent to the provider, and the account linking proceeds.

Once the GET request is executed, the attacker's SSO account becomes permanently linked to the victim's AwesomeAuthlibApp account.

Suggested Fix

Per the OAuth RFC [4], the state parameter should be tied to the user's session to prevent exactly such scenarios. One straightforward method of mitigating this issue is to…

Record
GHSA-fg6f-75jq-6523
CVSS 3.1
5.7 MediumCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
Weakness
CWE-352
Updated
2026-11-02
OSVPYSEC-2026-1201 5.7

Authlib has 1-click Account Takeover vulnerability

Security Advisory: Cache-Backed State Storage CSRF in Authlib

The Security Labs team at Snyk has reported a security issue affecting Authlib, identified during a recent research project.

The Snyk Security Labs team has identified a vulnerability that can result in a one-click account takeover in applications that utilize the Authlib library.

Description

Cache-backed state/request-token storage is not tied to the initiating user session, making CSRF possible for any attacker that possesses a valid state value (easily obtainable via an attacker-initiated authentication flow). When a cache is supplied to the OAuth client registry, FrameworkIntegration.set_state_data writes the entire state blob under _state_{app}_{state}, and get_state_data disregards the caller's session entirely. [1][2]

    def _get_cache_data(self, key):
        value = self.cache.get(key)
        if not value:
            return None
        try:
            return json.loads(value)
        except (TypeError, ValueError):
            return None
[snip]
    def get_state_data(self, session, state):
        key = f"_state_{self.name}_{state}"
        if self.cache:
            value = self._get_cache_data(key)
        else:
            value = session.get(key)
        if value:
            return value.get("data")
        return None

authlib/integrations/base_client/framework_integration.py:12-41

Retrieval in authorize_access_token therefore succeeds for whichever browser presents that opaque value, and the token exchange proceeds with the attacker's authorization code. [3]

    def authorize_access_token(self, **kwargs):
        """Fetch access token in one step.

        :return: A token dict.
        """
        params = request.args.to_dict(flat=True)
        state = params.get("oauth_token")
        if not state:
            raise OAuthError(description='Missing "oauth_token" parameter')

        data = self.framework.get_state_data(session, state)
        if not data:
            raise OAuthError(description='Missing "request_token" in temporary data')

        params["request_token"] = data["request_token"]
        params.update(kwargs)
        self.framework.clear_state_data(session, state)
        token = self.fetch_access_token(**params)
        self.token = token
        return token

authlib/integrations/flask_client/apps.py:57-76

This opens up an avenue for Login CSRF in applications that use cache-backed storage. Depending on the dependent application's implementation (e.g., whether it links accounts in the event of a login CSRF), this could lead to account takeover.

Proof of Concept

Consider a hypothetical application — AwesomeAuthlibApp. Assume that AwesomeAuthlibApp contains internal logic such that, when an already authenticated user performs a callback request, the application links the newly provided SSO identity to the existing user account associated with that request.

Under these conditions, an attacker can achieve account takeover within the application by performing the following actions:

  1. The attacker initiates an SSO OAuth flow but halts the process immediately before the callback request is made to AwesomeAuthlibApp.
  2. The attacker then induces a logged-in user (via phishing, a drive-by attack, or similar means) to perform a GET request containing the attacker's state value and authorization code to the AwesomeAuthlibApp callback endpoint. Because Authlib does not verify whether the state token is bound to the session performing the callback, the callback is processed, the authorization code is sent to the provider, and the account linking proceeds.

Once the GET request is executed, the attacker's SSO account becomes permanently linked to the victim's AwesomeAuthlibApp account.

Suggested Fix

Per the OAuth RFC [4], the state parameter should be tied to the user's session to prevent exactly such scenarios. One straightforward method of mitigating this issue is to…

Record
PYSEC-2026-1201
CVSS 3.1
5.7 MediumCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
Updated
2026-11-02
OSVUBUNTU-CVE-2025-68158 5.7

Authlib is a Python library which builds OAuth and OpenID Connect servers. In versions 1.0.0 through 1.6.5, cache-backed state/request-token storage is not tied to the initiating user session, so CSRF is possible for any attacker that has a valid state (easily obtainable via an attacker-initiated authentication flow). When a cache is supplied to the OAuth client registry, FrameworkIntegration.set_state_data writes the entire state blob under state{app}_{state}, and get_state_data ignores the caller’s session altogether. This issue has been patched in version 1.6.6.

Record
UBUNTU-CVE-2025-68158
CVSS 3.1
5.7 MediumCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
CVSS 3.1
8.8 HighCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Updated
2026-11-02
OSVopenSUSE-SU-2026:10034-1 No score

python311-Authlib-1.6.6-1.1 on GA media

These are all security issues fixed in the python311-Authlib-1.6.6-1.1 package on the GA media of openSUSE Tumbleweed.

Record
openSUSE-SU-2026:10034-1
Updated
2026-11-02
OSVopenSUSE-SU-2026:20257-1 No score

Security update for python-Authlib

This update for python-Authlib fixes the following issues:

Changes in python-Authlib:

  • CVE-2025-68158: Fixed 1-click account takeover in applications that use the Authlib library (bsc#1256414)
Record
openSUSE-SU-2026:20257-1
Updated
2026-11-02
OSVSUSE-SU-2026:0828-1 No score

Security update for python-Authlib

This update for python-Authlib fixes the following issues:

  • CVE-2025-68158: Fixed 1-click account takeover in applications that use the Authlib library (bsc#1256414)
Record
SUSE-SU-2026:0828-1
Updated
2026-11-02
OSVUSN-8065-1 No score

python-authlib vulnerabilities

Millie Solem discovered that Authlib did not properly restrict algorithm selection during JWT verification, allowing HMAC verification with asymmetric public keys when no algorithm was specified. A remote attacker could possibly use this issue to bypass signature verification and forge tokens, resulting in authentication bypass or privilege escalation. (CVE-2024-37568)

Muhammad Noman Ilyas discovered that Authlib did not properly enforce critical header parameter handling during JSON Web Signature verification, leading to unknown critical parameters being incorrectly accepted. A remote attacker could possibly use this issue to bypass security policies in mixed deployments, resulting in authentication bypass, replay attacks, or privilege escalation. (CVE-2025-59420)

Muhammad Noman Ilyas discovered that Authlib did not properly limit the size of JSON Web Signature or JSON Web Token header and signature segments. A remote attacker could possibly use this issue to cause excessive memory or processor consumption, leading to a denial of service. (CVE-2025-61920)

Muhammad Noman Ilyas discovered that Authlib performed unbounded decompression when processing certain compressed encrypted tokens. A remote attacker could possibly use this issue to send a specially crafted token that can be expanded to a large size during decompression, causing a denial of service. (CVE-2025-62706)

It was discovered that Authlib did not properly bind cached state information to the initiating user session during OAuth authentication flows. A remote attacker could possibly use this issue to perform cross- site request forgery attacks, resulting in unauthorized actions or authentication bypass. This issue only affected Ubuntu 24.04 LTS. (CVE-2025-68158)

Record
USN-8065-1
Updated
2026-11-02

Affected products

Affected packages

Affected packages
PackageAffectedFixed
authlib
PyPI
1.0.0 to 1.6.5
1.6.6
python-authlib
Debian:12
before 1.2.0-1+deb12u1, plus listed versions
1.2.0-1
1.2.0-1+deb12u1
python-authlib
Debian:13
before 1.6.0-1+deb13u1, plus listed versions
1.6.0-1
1.6.0-1+deb13u1
python-authlib
Debian:14
before 1.6.6-1, plus listed versions
1.6.0-11.6.1-11.6.3-11.6.4-11.6.5-1
1.6.6-1
authlib
PyPI
1.0.0 up to 1.6.6, plus listed versions
1.0.11.1.01.2.01.2.11.3.0
Show 13 moreShow less
1.3.11.3.21.4.01.4.11.5.01.5.11.5.21.6.01.6.11.6.21.6.31.6.41.6.5
1.6.6
python-Authlib
SUSE:Linux Enterprise Module for Python 3 15 SP7
before 1.3.1-150600.3.14.1
1.3.1-150600.3.14.1
python-Authlib
openSUSE:Leap 15.6
before 1.3.1-150600.3.14.1
1.3.1-150600.3.14.1
python-authlib
Ubuntu:Pro:24.04:LTS
before 1.3.0-1ubuntu0.1~esm1, plus listed versions
1.2.1-11.3.0-1
1.3.0-1ubuntu0.1~esm1
python-authlib
Ubuntu:25.10
All versions, plus listed versions
1.5.1-11.5.2-11.6.0-1
None known
python-authlib
Ubuntu:Pro:22.04:LTS
From an advisory covering 5 CVEs
before 0.15.5-1ubuntu0.1~esm1, plus listed versions
0.15.4-10.15.5-1
0.15.5-1ubuntu0.1~esm1
python-authlib
Ubuntu:Pro:24.04:LTS
From an advisory covering 5 CVEs
before 1.3.0-1ubuntu0.1~esm1, plus listed versions
1.2.1-11.3.0-1
1.3.0-1ubuntu0.1~esm1
python-Authlib
openSUSE:Tumbleweed
before 1.6.6-1.1
1.6.6-1.1
python-Authlib
openSUSE:Leap 16.0
before 1.5.2-bp160.2.1
1.5.2-bp160.2.1

History

History
RecordedChangedSources
affected, facts
first indexedCVE List, EUVD, GitHub Advisories, NVD, OSV

Dates are when Every CVE recorded each change. Upstream dates may differ.

In short

CVE-2025-68158 is a medium vulnerability (CVSS 5.7) in Authlib, published January 8, 2026. No source lists public exploit code. EPSS puts the chance of exploitation in the next 30 days at 0.27%, the 19th percentile. Fixed in authlib 1.6.6.

References

Show 13 moreShow less
This page doesn't list everything

Left out here: the rest of 3 source descriptions. The JSON record has them.

MoveEnter Open